BBP_PDH_SEARCH equivalent in SRM 2.0

Hi everyone,
What is the function group under SRM 2.0 that maches the group function <b>BBP_PDH_SEARCH</b> in SRM 5.0 ?
Thanks in advance,

Dear Poster,
As no response has been provided to the thread in some time I must assume the issue is resolved, if the question is still valid please create a new thread rephrasing the query and providing as much data as possible to promote response from the community.
Best Regards,
SDN SRM Moderation Team

Similar Messages

  • Error sending PO via XI to SRM

    Hello experts,
    we are currently facing a problem in SRM receiving POs from MM system. The POs are mapped before from Idoc to XI-Message in XI. Mapping in XI is okay, no errors in SXMB_MONI.
    The following error is reported in SRM-System (tx: SXMB_MONI):
    Any ideas, how to solve the problem?
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Björn

    Hi sudhir sharma,
    we have solved the problem. It was due to wrong partner number in the IDoc-Message. The partner number in MM was not equivalent to SRM.
    Thanks for your hints.
    Regards,
    Björn v. Wahl

  • BBPCRM 4.0 is equal to SRM 3.0

    Hi,
    In my Development server I have checked it is BBP CRM 4.0 . Go to System -Status -Component verison .
    I want a clarification  whether it is equivalent to SRM 3.0
    Regards
    Ganesh Kumar .G.

    YES.
    service.sap.com/pam
    more details
    Muthu

  • What's the equivalent for "Manage Business Partner" or BBPMAININT in SRM 7

    Hello,
    Where can I launch the "manage business partner" process in SRM 7.0 system, which is equivalent to "Manage Business Partner" menu or BBPMAININT transaction in lower SRM release (<7.0)?
    Thanks.

    Hi,
    It is "Business Partner" for strategic purchaser and "SRM Administration" for administrator.
    You see POWL for Business Partner.
    Regards,
    Masa

  • Equivalent of Attribute ITS_DEST in SRM 7.0

    Hi All,
    What is the equivalent of atrribute ITS_DEST in SRM 7.0 . This attribute was used in SRM 5.0 as a logon link in the offline approval mail.
    In SRM 7.0 my offline approval  mail has got  a link in it  and when user click on that link it should take them to the SRM 7.0 system.  Currently the link that is  genearted is wrong. As far as i know that the attribute ITS_DEST is absolute  in SRM 7.0 , then from where the system is generating the link.
    or do we need to maintain that attribute in SRM 7.0 system too ?
    Thanks
    Iftekhar Alam
    Edited by: Iftekhar Alam on Sep 17, 2010 4:51 PM
    Note : I use report /SAPSRM/OFFLINEAPPROVALSEND to send my offline approval mail.

    Hi All,
    Please follow the below thread for the resolution.
    Re: Wrong hyperlink in /SAPSRM/OFFLINEAPPROVALSEND mail
    Thanks
    Iftekhar Alam

  • User Authorisations in SRM 7.0

    Dear Experts,
    We are Configuring Extended Classic Scenario in SRM 7.0.
    We have two Purchasing groups each responsible for one Product category.
    We have one purchaser assigned to each Purchasing group and the we have given the Product category responsible for the Purchasing grioup in Extended attribut of the Purchaser Position.
    After creating SC by the user when we try to process PO by loging in as Purchaser we can able to see the PO from both the Purchaser log in.
    Can any one help in restricting the user to process the PO belonging to the assigned Purchasing Group.
    Is it possible to restrict by attributes or through Authorisation objects assigned for the user.
    Regards,
    B.N.Karthikeyan.

    Hello,
    To check correspondance between PO puchasing group and user purchasing group, you could:
    1 - get PO detais using function modul BBP_PD_PO_GETDETAIL. At header level you can find Purch. Org and Purch. Group
    2 - get user Organizational Unit ID (which is purchasing group ID) using BBP_OM_STRUC_GET_ORG_FROM_USER, then run FM BBP_OM_DETERMINE_RESP_PGRP to get purchasing group code linked to user Organizational Unit ID.
    For FM BBP_OM_DETERMINE_RESP_PGRP, i don't remember if you can get directly purchasing group value using importing parameter is_object-objid = purch. group ID (and is_object-otype = 'O').
    If not, run this FM without any importing parameter: you will get all purchasing groups.
    Then, look for purch. group of you purchaser among them.
    As you are in SRM 7.0, I dont know if all indicated FM are available: if not, look for their equivalent.
    Regards.
    Laurent.

  • Blanket PO in SRM 7 ECS

    Hi Experts,
    We are on SRM 7 ECS , support pack SAPKIBKV08.
    Requirement is that requester in SRM need to create SC for blanket orders. these sc after approval will create blanket PO .
    we have given SC full functionality to requesters where they can create limit item. But the issue is
    a. how can we create a limit cart  for a material or service , not for material/service group.SRM 7 limit item allows to create SC only for material/service group 
    ( in ECC , in framework PO , we can create with item category standard , limit , and service. SRM limit functionality is equivalent to creating limit , and service item category. what about "standard" )
    b. If we want to buy blanket materials , rather than material groups, through SRM, how do we buy
    c. How do other projects buy blanket materials , rather than material groups, through SRM
    rgds
    sumendra

    Hello,
    Have a look at thread below:
    [meaning of sc with value limit|meaning of sc with vlaue limit;
    Regards.
    Laurent

  • In the Extended Classic scenario, what creates the PO on the SRM side?

    Hi Experts,
    This sounds like a simple question, however, I've been unable to find the answer.
    What I am looking for is the process (report, workflow or function module etc etc) that actually creates the PO on the SRM side once the shopping cart has been approved (before it is replicated to ECC).
    The reason for this is, after a support stack upgrade, the creation of the PO seems to have slowed down once the shopping cart has been created.  I'm trying to track down where the PO gets created and what triggers that to happen, in order to work out why it isn't as quick as it was prior to the upgrade, but can't piece together the full end to end process.
    I can see the "Workflow Without Approval Shopping Cart" workflow that obviously Releases the shopping cart and sets the status to Approved...  I can then see the equivalent workflow for the PO (Workflow Without Approval for PurchOrder), but I can't work out the bit inbetween -
    - How does the PO actually gets created in SRM and what triggers that to happen?
    Any help will be gratefully received - thanks in advance.

    its an event related to the shopping cart business object- BUS2121.
    your approval workflow should be of status set released, which will trigger the methor BBP_REQREQ_TRANSFER, finished approval is the event which will be triggered by the workflow, based on this event, system will trigger reqreq_transfer.

  • FM or include that triggers Workflow in sap SRM 5.0.

    Hi All,
    Can anyone tell me the FM, for triggering a workflow in SAP SRM 5.0. I mean the name of the program or Include or an FM which finally triggers workflow while saving?
    Thanks,
    Edited by: Manoj Singh on Oct 6, 2011 6:51 PM

    Hi Gaurav,
    Thanks for responding. Yes, all the backend config are in place since I am able to successfully run an equivalent RFC (BBP_PD_SC_GETLIST) and another RFC named BBP_PD_SC_GETDETAIL from SE37. The problem seems to be something very specific to the ES. May I request you to run this ES at your end (if possible) and let me know the result possibly with the input and output message similar to the one I pasted in the origincal question.
    Thanks in advance,
    Nilay

  • Unable to test enterprise services in SAP SRM 7.0 EhP1

    Hi experts,
    For my recent project, we have enabled "PI Independent Enterprise Services" business function in our SRM 7.01 EhP1 system. While to trying to test some of the enterprise services, we are facing some error. I am pasting the request message and the response that I got from the enterprise service InternalRequestSRMByElementsQueryResponse_in. While defining the end point, I have used basic authentication settings. Note that I am testing this ES with my own user id and password which is a valid on for the SRM system. Can someone help please?
    Request message:
    POST /sap/bc/srt/xip/sapsrm/internalrequestsrmbyel/100/sapsrm_internalrequestsrmbyel/sapsrm_internalrequestsrmbyel_binding HTTP/1.1
    Host: <host>:<port>
    Content-Type: text/xml; charset=UTF-8
    Connection: close
    Authorization: <value is hidden>
    SAP-PASSPORT: 2A54482A0300E60000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000064353632326163306235363431316530383330333030303030323337663833320000000002D5622AC0B56411E0830300000237F832D562EADFB56411E0AD3800000237F83200000001000000002A54482A
    Content-Length: 753
    SOAPAction: ""
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?><SOAP-ENV:Envelope xmlns:SOAP-ENV="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"><SOAP-ENV:Header><sapsess:Session xmlns:sapsess="http://www.sap.com/webas/630/soap/features/session/"><enableSession>true</enableSession></sapsess:Session></SOAP-ENV:Header><SOAP-ENV:Body><ns1:InternalRequestSRMByElementsQuery_sync xmlns:ns1='http://sap.com/xi/SAPGlobal20/Global'><InternalRequestSelectionByElements><CreationDatePeriod><StartDate>2011-04-01</StartDate><EndDate>2011-07-22</EndDate></CreationDatePeriod></InternalRequestSelectionByElements></ns1:InternalRequestSRMByElementsQuery_sync></SOAP-ENV:Body></SOAP-ENV:Envelope>
    Response that I got:
    HTTP/1.1 200 OK
    content-type: text/xml; charset=utf-8
    content-length: 915
    accept: text/xml
    sap-srt_id: 20110723/194910/v1.00_final_6.40/4E24C49F23184117E1008000097C2FFA
    sap-srt_server_info: SRM_100,167 ,http://sap.com/xi/SRM/SE/Global,InternalRequestSRMByElementsQueryResponse_in,InternalRequestSRMByElementsQuery_sync,126
    server: SAP NetWeaver Application Server / ABAP 702
    <soap-env:Envelope xmlns:soap-env="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"><soap-env:Header/><soap-env:Body><n0:InternalRequestSRMByElementsResponse_sync xmlns:n0="http://sap.com/xi/SAPGlobal20/Global"><Log><BusinessDocumentProcessingResultCode>5</BusinessDocumentProcessingResultCode><MaximumLogItemSeverityCode>4</MaximumLogItemSeverityCode><Item><SeverityCode>4</SeverityCode><Note>Abort occurred; Internal request not read</Note></Item><Item><SeverityCode>4</SeverityCode><Note>Abort The attributes of the user are inconsistent or not defined. See transaction PPOMA_BBP. on Internal request level</Note></Item><Item><SeverityCode>4</SeverityCode><Note>Abort An exception with the type CX_GDT_CONVERSION occur red, but was neither handled locally, nor declared in a RAISING clause on Internal request level</Note></Item></Log></n0:InternalRequestSRMByElementsResponse_sync></soap-env:Body></soap-env:Envelope>

    Hi Gaurav,
    Thanks for responding. Yes, all the backend config are in place since I am able to successfully run an equivalent RFC (BBP_PD_SC_GETLIST) and another RFC named BBP_PD_SC_GETDETAIL from SE37. The problem seems to be something very specific to the ES. May I request you to run this ES at your end (if possible) and let me know the result possibly with the input and output message similar to the one I pasted in the origincal question.
    Thanks in advance,
    Nilay

  • SRM and Inventory with a Contract

    Using ECC 6, SRM 7(Extended Classic)
    Contracts maintained in backend and replicated into SRM.
    Inventory Contract created in a 'bulk' fashion - e.g. - without a specific Material.
    Contract is setup in ECC with an Item Category of 'M' (Material Unknown) and an Account Assignment Category of blank.
    If using ECC we then raise a Purchase Order - this works fine.
    When replicating the Contract into SRM it fails error is 'BL001' - Item type error.
    General Scenario - We have a contract for numerous goods (Clothing) , so we enter one (1) line in the Contract. We can't define a specific material on the Contract as the goods required vary ecah Shoppnig Cart - e.g. - Shirt Blue Size 10 on 1 SC, then next day may be Trousers Grey Long - whatever. All of the various types of clothing are covered under one (1) Contract.
    We can;t specify a particular Material on the Contract because the SC (and subsequent PO) will validate against the Contract Material. This all works fine in SRM and it seems that our problem is the inability to replicate teh contract into SRM since it does not recognise the 'M' Item Type category.
    Any guidance appreciated.
    Thanks.
    Gerry Steer

    Hello Gerry
    I dont know the answer but i am telling the fact of SRM
    SRM has three Item types
    Material
    Product category
    Services
    but i understand you use this report BBP_CONTRACT_INITIAL_UPLOAD program to transfer all ECC contract to SRM as a repository upon your business rule,
    SAP SRM dont have idea how material unknown M item category mapped in SRM
    as of i know there is no option in SRM for this MATERIAL UNKNOWN item type .
    SERVICE - AVAILABLE IN SRM
    MATERIAL - KNOWN MATERIAL AVAILABLE IN SRM
    MATERIAL GROUP - Available in SRM
    Please kindly report to SAP via OSS message  , i think this unknown material mapping must be done as equivalent to ECC or some alternative like product category contract.
    Muthuraman

  • Third party -- XI -- SRM Scenario,

    Hi SRM experts,
    We have a third party sending XML PO Request with external reference ID to XI, map it to SRM PO Request, and send to SRM. What we would want the SRM to do is to process the incoming request, generate  a PO number, and send back an XML PO confirmation with the external reference ID and newly generated PO number.
    In R/3, I know we have to set up partner profiles, ports, and message control to automate the creation and sedning of order response for an incoming order request. Are there equivalent configurations we can do in SRM? If yes, where can we do that? Basically I would like to create an output determination when a PO is created in SRM, so that the PO is sent to the third party application via XI.
    Has anyone have any suggestion on this? or encountered similar scenario?
    Your feedback is greatly appreciated.
    Thanks
    Karma

    Hello Karma,
    What is the "PO Request" ? Is it same scenarion with this ?
    External system to SRM
    Regards,
    Masa

  • Supplier  Catalog upload  w/o Prodcut ID in SRM MDM CATLOG

    Hi experts,
    The supplier catalog loaded by supplier, will not have Product ID. I believe , even though we don't have product id, we can create a SC in SRM.
    Will there be any isuue  , if v r not geting the prodcut id in catalog upload file by supplier.?
    I think this SC will be a created as free text in sap SRM. Is supplier part number equivalent to Prodcut id?
    Plz help.
    Thanks,
    SK

    Q The supplier catalog loaded by supplier, will not have Product ID. I believe , even though we don't have product id, we can create a SC in SRM.
    A:- Yes. you can . it creates based on product category sc
    Will there be any isuue , if v r not geting the prodcut id in catalog upload file by supplier.?
    I think this SC will be a created as free text in sap SRM.yes.
    Q  Is supplier part number equivalent to Prodcut
    id?
    A :-product id and supplier part number are totally different.
    for eg oci fields for product no :- NEW_ITEM-MATNR[n]
    spn :- NEW_ITEM-VENDORMAT[n]
    br
    muthu

  • How to replicate R/3 Vendor Master changes to SRM

    Hi Gurus,
    We have scheduled the job "BBP_VENDOR_GET_DATA_JOB " on daily basis, the job is running and updating the new vendor master from R/3 to EBP. But it is not updating the R/3 vendor master changes (E.g. Blocking the Vendor in R/3) are not getting update to R/3.
    Please any one can suggest which job we need to schedule for this one. Also I found to report for this one " BBP_VENDOR_UPDATE_DATA_JOB" and BBP_VENDORS _SYNC", but I am not sure which one needs to setup. Also please suggest me any config needs to be do for this one.
    Your help will greatly appreciated.
    Thanks & regards,
    Sada

    Hi Sada,
    AS per  OSS Note 602651 , for SRM 2.0 and SRM 3.0 [ EBP 3.0 and EBP 3.5] SAP provided the  report  BBP_VENDOR_GET_DATA_JOB and BBP_VENDOR_UPDATE_DATA_JOB which could be scheduled in background for vendor replication and synchronization in SRM. These reports are equivalent to TCODE BBPGETVD and BBPUPDVD.
    Thereafter from SRM 4.0 onwards SAP strategy has been to do one time replication through BBPGETVD and provided different way of synchronizing the replicated vendor. That is based on change object concept, for that it has provided an SPRO Node for Customization.
    SPRO->IMG->SAP Supplier Relationship Management -> SRM server -> Technical Basic setting -> Settings for Supplier Synchronization
    The Customization setting is required before we schedule the synchronization job. The Synchronization job runs the report BBP_VENDOR_SYNC.
    Cheers
    Iftekhar Alam

  • ERS indicator of PO item is not checked for Contract assigned SRM POs.

    Hi Team
    We have SRM PO which is assigned to contract as source of supply and vendor for the contract document is assigned with ERS functionality (Aut. setlement in vendor master) for Invoice settlement.
    Issue faced: When the contract is selected as sources of supply for Shopping cart and ordered as release order in MM (classic deployment) MM PO line ERS flag is not defaulted. Scenario works for normal procurement with vendor assigned Purchase orders.
    Did any one faced similar issue in their landscape.
    Regards
    Prashanth K Saralaya

    I think this  is one of the vendor data synchronisation issue like OA vendor .
    Vendor master team might change some data but in contract it will not be synched automaticaly. we may require action on CONTRACT equivalent to vendor master maintenance.
    if the contract has ERS .It might be available in PO too when you refer contract.
    debate come here like who takes precedence vendor master or contract ?
    However customer may expect this ERS falg has to set in the contract as well as it may replicate the same in po as well.
    for testing manually EDIT via ECC contract and flag ERS.
    muthu

Maybe you are looking for