BCS Issue

Hi,
I am using BCS along with SSS Target App ID. I am able to create ECT and list but when I click on the list getting this error below. I do have full access everywhere.
Please help.
srabon

Hi，
You need to trace the exact error by using Correlation ID.
Here are two great blogs for you to take a look at:
http://www.habaneroconsulting.com/insights/An-Even-Better-Way-to-Get-the-Real-SharePoint-Error#.UwrFamiwrwo
http://blog.credera.com/technology-insights/microsoft-solutions/troubleshooting-sharepoint-errors/
Best Regards,
Linda Li
Linda Li
TechNet Community Support

Similar Messages

  • Raising Customer Messages with SAP OSS on BCS issues

    Hi guys,
    I'd be keen to know everyone's opinion on raising customer messages with SAP OSS, in particular on BCS.
    Often I find that my colleagues are hesitant to raise a note with SAP because they think it either takes too long or they don't get a satisfactory answer.
    Whereas as soon as I see something fishy, that I cannot explain I will check my logic once more, check on SDN, check existing OSS notes, then raise a Customer Message immediately (while I continue to investigate/test).
    This is partly due to my experience that half the time I feel like a guinea pig in BCS, perhaps because BCS is not as widespread as other modules and i may be the first to try something so may be first to experience the problem.
    The first line response (often from Shanghai) usually tries to send the message straight back but I find with a little persistence, clear (and irrefutable) documentation , you soon get through to the experts in Germany (or is it Czech Rep?) who actually understand the issue.
    The client has paid a lot of money for the service through their SAP licensing and maintenance fees, so I have no qualms about 'reporting a product error' when I see one.
    Also, I find a lot of BCS documentation is out of date, not updated as new releases/EHPs come out, eg I recently relied on the contents of OSS note 936590, which was wrong for BCS 604. So I raised a customer message and requested that they update it, which has now been done - this is too late for me but might help someone else.
    Raising a Customer Message with OSS is not an excuse to avoid doing your job, but where there is a genuine error in BCS, I encourage others to raise OSS notes and persis with them until a satisfatcory response is received.

    Concur with TheScotsman.
    The situation is almost the same: the 1st line support (India) very often beat back the costomer message without going deep into the problem. However, if we persist and provide additional details (or when the message was made very professionally and bypassed the 1st line) the message was rerouted to consultants from Czeck Rep.). In this case the progress was significant. Since the client do not provide access to the system, in a couple of times we made a remote session: the support guy gave directions what to do in the system and where to look for some details. The problems were solved in a half an hour.

  • Regarding login problem

    actually i am in change mode using rz10. suddenly system shut down with out restart.after restarting the system i unable to login to the system.so how can i over come this.

    This sounds more like a BASIS issue than a BCS issue. It is suggested you ask BASIS team for help.

  • BW BCS cube(0bcs_vc10 ) Report huge performance issue

    Hi Masters,
    I am working out for a solution for BW report developed in 0bcs_vc10 virtual cube.
    Some of the querys is taking more 15 to 20 minutes to execute the report.
    This is huge performance issue. We are using BW 3.5, and report devloped in bex and published thru portal. Any one faced similar problem please advise how you tackle this issue. Please give the detail analysis approach how you resolved this issue.
    Current service pack we are using is
    SAP_BW 350 0016 SAPKW35016
    FINBASIS 300 0012 SAPK-30012INFINBASIS
    BI_CONT 353 0008 SAPKIBIFP8
    SEM-BW 400 0012 SAPKGS4012
    Best of Luck
    Chris
    BW BCS cube(0bcs_vc10 ) Report huge performance issue

    Ravi,
    I already did that, it is not helping me much for the performance. Reports are taking 15 t0 20 minutes. I wanted any body in this forum have the same issue how
    they resolved it.
    Regards,
    Chris

  • Issue in periodic budget transfer in FM BCS

    Hi All,
    We have implement FM BCS na dfacing issue in periodic budget transfers. Below is a example..
    Uploaded Budget for A fund center and AA commitment item for all months of a FY 2012
    Jan   = 150
    Feb   =100
    Mar  =100
    Ap =100
    May  =300
    Jun  =200
    July = 200
    Aug =200
    Sep =200
    Oct =100
    Nov =100
    Dec = 100
    Now the total current budget for FY 2012 is 1850 eur
    Now I want to transfer budget from this fund center "A" and commitment item "AA" to some other fund center and commitment item. I am using distribution key as "0" lets say for feb 2012. I am able to transfer more than EUR 100 where as in FEB month I have only EUR 100 and I should not be able to transfer more than this. We are working on Annual Budgets.
    Please suggest on the same.
    Regards

    Hi,
    Budget control in BCS is working on annual/multi-annual basis, i.e. there will be no control on monthly basis even if you enter your budget period by period. If you want to implement monthly control, you might use FM object 'Budget period' which is available as from 6.04 release. If you are in earlier release you can make a workaround with some unused FM object, e.g. Funded Program. This issue has been discussed several times on SDN, so please search for available material.
    Regards,
    Eli

  • SEM-BCS - SAP Netweaver BI 7.0 and SEM-BW 600 -add on install issue

    Dear BCS Consultants:
    My client has installed NWeaver BI 7.0 and SEM BW 600 - add-on.
    However, when I tried to access BCS, it says 'lock table overflow'.
    Am I supposed to configure something before I access BCS or it is a Basis issue?
    Is there any other support package to be installed?
    Please guide me.
    Thanks ins advance.
    SAI2

    Yes..This is a Basis Issue. I got the same error and the Basis resolved it.
    Btw...Did you guys install SEM 6.0 on top of BI 7.0 right ?
    Please confirm as my client basis is in confusion on this..
    Thanks in advance,
    KG.

  • BCS: Performance Issue - Most of the time is spent doing commit work.

    Hello,
    We are experiencing performance issues with our BI server. This performance issue can been seen during our BCS runs. Our DBA has indicated that he sees a very high percentage of time time is spent doing "commit work".
    Curretly, we are running BI7 nw2004s, Basis 700, support pack 14.
    Anyone else experience this? As the BCS run is mainly stanard SAP code, I was wondering if there may be some snotes that correct this?
    Thank you for any help you could provide us.

    If it is related to SEM-BCS and new EHP releases, then there are still big problems with the monitor and tasks status management (meaning problems with performance). Is it the case? If yes, then you'd better  look for already released notes reg this and formulate your own OSSs if you don't find anything relevant.

  • BCS - Data collection issue

    Hi,
    I'm using BCS 4.0. I'm working now in final testing and I have some question regarding to the data collection process using load from data stream method. I ran the task in consolidation monitor for 007.2007 period and for all companies without any error or warnings, but we have differences in financial information for that period.
    I reviewed the content in my BCS cube (RSA1) and we don't have any data for that accounts, the only thing that I found was that all docs were created on same date
    I deleted the ID request in RSA1in my BCS cube and I executed task again in consolidation monitor, but the result was the same.
    Looking at log / source data, in the rows listed, these data is not taking from the infoprovider
    Any idea which could be the problem ?
    Thanks
    Nayeli

    Hi Nayeli,
    I had to do this kind of job (reconciliation of data in the source basis cube and the totals cube) during the final testing a lot of times, with an accountant.
    The only way to have the first clue what is happening is to compare every particular amount s in both cubes. Comparing and trying to figure out any dependencies in data.
    The difference might arise because of ANY reason. Only you may analyze the data and decide what to do.
    AFAIU, you compared only reported data and did no currency translation and eliminations?
    Then, I'm afraid that you've made a very big mistake deleting the request from the totals cube. You have broken the consistency between totals and document data. For a transactional cube the request is yellow until the number of records in it reach 50000 records. Then it is closed and become green. As you may understand, in those 50000 records maybe contained a lot of data for different posting periods, for example, reported data for the previous closed period. Though, documents still contain eliminations for that period. - Inconsistency.

  • Issue in uploading Hierarchy from BW to SEM BCS

    Hi All,
    We are getting the following error while trying to upload the hierarchy from BW to SEM BCS.FYI , Hierarchy is loaded into BW but it still throws an error.
    Error is : No hierarchies for InfoObject 0PROFIT_CTR available in BW.
    Can somebody help me out ...
    Regards,
    Jeevan

    Hi Eugene,
    I am loading from BW (0PROFIT_CTR) hierarchy to SEM BCS.
    I am loading thru "Load from data stream".
    Following are the steps :
    1.Selected data type "Consolidation unit"
    2.Selected characteristic "Profit Center"
    3.In the settings tab,
    a) I also maintained "source data basis" with the Infoobject cataloag & I used the same.
    b) selected "0profit_ctr" infoobject.
    c)also selected the check boxes "load master data" & "load hierarchy".
    4)In the mapping tab, selected all the necessary fields and mapped correctly.
    5)In the selection tab,maintained controlling area = 1000 .
    6)after the steps 1to 5,  executed the method.
    It gives an error "No hierarchy exists in BW for profit center ".
    Can you tell me, do we need to do any other steps before executing the method.
    Regards,
    Jeevan

  • Unable to crawl BCS data - Permissions Issue

    The dreaded Error while crawling LOB contents. ( Error caused by exception: Microsoft.BusinessData.Infrastructure.AccessDeniedException Access denied by Business Data Connectivity. )   But its not the Set Metadata Store Permissions
    issue.  I have access to the ECT in lists and the generated profile page.  I've logged on to the indexing server(not the WFE) as the domain\crawler account and was able to access the ECT in the same lists and generated profile pages.  
    The ECT is using a MS SQL server account in the Secured Store account and I've ensured domain\crawler has member access to the target application ID.   The crawler is working fine for actual sharepoint content as well as account profiles.  The
    crawl log only shows the error above.   Other things I've tried: giving the app pool account access to Metadata Store and Secure Sore.   Is there as way to see the account that is being denied during the crawl?  Any helpful steps to
    diagnose this?

    Hi  V115567 ,
    For troubleshooting your issue, please  take steps  as below:
    Grant the permissions for your account to the external content type:
    http://zimmergren.net/technical/access-denied-by-business-data-connectivity-solution
    Add your account  into “Set metadata store permission” :
    http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11535488/access-denied-by-business-data-connectivity-error
    Also here is a good blog for Implementing Business Data Connectivity in SharePoint 2013:
    http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/683749/Implementing-Business-Data-Connectivity-in-SharePo
    Best Regards,
    Eric
    Eric Tao
    TechNet Community Support

  • Faxing issue with BCS

    Hi guys,
    I am looking for a solution that allows me to
    - send faxes by Business Communication Services (BCS) without showing the sender fax on the document
    - to receive the status of the fax (success or error), but I want to get rid of the undeliverable faxes.
    I could not find anything suitable in classes CL_BCS and CL_SEND_REQUEST_BCS. I am a developer, maybe there is someting I can do in the system's settings...
    Any idea is very welcome!
    Best regards,
    Gerald

    Try this way
          move : 'N' to v_request_status. "<<< N means - no status returned >>>
          v_status = v_request_status.
          call method send_request->set_status_attributes
            exporting
              i_requested_status = v_request_status
              i_status_mail      = v_status.
          call method send_request->send( ).
          commit work.
    a®

  • BCS Release Request Short dump

    Hello,
    I'm trying to release my costumizing request, that contains the SEM-BCS configuration, although i'm getting a short-dump.
    The description is as follows:
    Short text
        Access via 'NULL' object reference not possible.
    What happened?
        Error in the ABAP Application Program
        The current ABAP program "CL_UG_MD_TR_METHOD_EXPORT=====CP" had to be
         terminated because it has
        come across a statement that unfortunately cannot be executed.
    Error analysis
        You attempted to use a 'NULL' object reference (points to 'nothing')
        access a component (variable: " ").
        An object reference must point to an object (an instance of a class)
        before it can be used to access components.
        Either the reference was never set or it was set to 'NULL' using the
        CLEAR statement.
    How to correct the error
        If the error occures in a non-modified SAP program, you may be able to
        find an interim solution in an SAP Note.
        If you have access to SAP Notes, carry out a search with the following
        keywords:
        "OBJECTS_OBJREF_NOT_ASSIGNED" " "
        "CL_UG_MD_TR_METHOD_EXPORT=====CP" or "CL_UG_MD_TR_METHOD_EXPORT=====CM003"
        "UGMD_EXTRACT_SID_2"
    Information on where terminated
        Termination occurred in the ABAP program "CL_UG_MD_TR_METHOD_EXPORT=====CP" -
         in "UGMD_EXTRACT_SID_2".
        The main program was "RDDM0001 ".
        In the source code you have the termination point in line 62
        of the (Include) program "CL_UG_MD_TR_METHOD_EXPORT=====CM003".
    Source Code Extract
    Line  SourceCde
       32   FIELD-SYMBOLS <lt_table> TYPE INDEX TABLE.
       33   FIELD-SYMBOLS <ld_fsid> TYPE ug_sid.
       34   FIELD-SYMBOLS <ld_vsid> TYPE ug_sid.
       35 *  FIELD-SYMBOLS <lt_target> TYPE ANY TABLE.
       36
       37   ASSIGN io_itab->rd_wa->* TO <ls_wa>.
       38   IF i_value_sid IS NOT INITIAL.
       39     ASSIGN COMPONENT i_value_sid
       40            OF STRUCTURE <ls_wa>
       41            TO <ld_vsid>.
       42     CHECK sy-subrc = 0.
       43   ELSE.
       44     CREATE DATA lr_sid.
       45     ASSIGN lr_sid->* TO <ld_vsid>.
       46     CLEAR <ld_vsid>.
       47   ENDIF.
       48
       49   IF NOT i_fieldname_sid IS INITIAL.                  "Start hah160603.1
       50     ASSIGN COMPONENT i_fieldname_sid
       51            OF STRUCTURE <ls_wa>
       52            TO <ld_fsid>.
       53     CHECK sy-subrc = 0.
       54   ELSE.
       55     CALL METHOD ugmd_get_fieldname_to_table
       56       EXPORTING
       57         i_tabname = i_datainfo-tabname
       58       IMPORTING
       59         e_fieldname = ld_fieldname.
       60     lo_fieldname = cl_ug_md_fieldname=>if_ug_md_fieldname~get_instance(
       61       ld_fieldname ).
       62  >>>>>     ld_fieldname_sid_fix = lo_fieldname->ds_data-sid.
       63     ASSIGN ld_fieldname_sid_fix TO <ld_fsid>.
       64   ENDIF.                                                "End hah160603.1
       65
    Contents of system fields
    Name     Val.
    SY-SUBRC 0
    SY-INDEX 1
    SY-TABIX 0
    SY-DBCNT 0
    SY-FDPOS 0
    SY-LSIND 1
    SY-PAGNO 0
    SY-LINNO 1
    SY-COLNO 1
    SY-PFKEY TDR_FULL
    SY-UCOMM REFR
    SY-TITLE Transport organizer: ordens
    SY-MSGTY I
    SY-MSGID FINB_TR
    SY-MSGNO 009
    SY-MSGV1 &
    SY-MSGV2 &
    SY-MSGV3
    SY-MSGV4
    SY-MODNO 0
    SY-DATUM 20080904
    SY-UZEIT 200112
    SY-XPROG SAPLSYST
    SY-XFORM SYSTEM_HOOK_OPEN_DATASET
    If someone have gone trough a similar experience, or have any tip of how to solve this issue, i'd apreciate a comment.
    Will award points for valuable help.
    Thank you

    Hi Ricardo,
    You tried to transport the BCS' configuration, right?
    If in the request was the full set of settings from the start of the project, the it will definitely fail.
    There are some restrictions in BCS transport. See, for example the OSS Note #627924 - 'Restrictions with transport in BW-based SEM-BCS'. It particularly says:
    "For the initial system setup, and after substantial changes in the data model, you should transport the Customizing by means of manually created transport requests. We advise you not to use the automatic recording of all Customizing settings during the first implementation phase in the development system and not to use this request for the structure of the test and productive systems.
    During the transport of a new consolidation area, the following settings should be transported in the following sequence:
    1. Data basis
    2. Consolidation area
    3. Special versions
    After the import of the data basis and the consolidation area, these settings should be checked in the target system. In particular, the RFC destination, the InfoCubes and ODS objects, as well as the InfoObjects. Note that RFC destinations, InfoCubes, ODS objects, virtual cubes and InfoObjects cannot be transported from the consolidation workbench with the transport functions. For instance, you have to transport and activate the InfoCubes and InfoObjects using the BW."
    I usually transport the BCS setting in a little transport requests in this order:
    - all BW objects and settings
    - data basis (with source DB)
    - cons area
    - special versions
    - versions
    - master data
    ...etc.
    Hope this helps.

  • Can we use BCS component  in ECC 6.0, without installing BI 7.0?

    We have a unique situation. We have planned to migrate from 4.6B to ECC 6.0. We have FI- LC and we want to move to SEM-BCS 6.0 in ECC 6.0, without installing separate BI (netweaver 2004s) instance. Is that possible? If possible, will there be any performance issues?  If we use BCS in ECC 6.0, does it eliminate the job of FS data extraction to BW-SEM?
    Do we need a separate BI system, which can also include SEM-BCS? What are the advantages?
    We look forward for advice.

    We found that without installing BI 7.0, BCS component (with its own internal BI) is working in ECC 6.0. In earlier ECC 5.0 or R/3, such facility was not available.
    My question is that "Is it good to use SEM-BCS with in ECC 6.0" or  "Is it better to have separate BI instance, which can include BCS" .  Either answer has to be supported with points. Appreciate any assistance.

  • Problem connecting to external SQL table using BCS in SharePoint Foundation 2010

    Hi all,
    I am working on SharePoint Foundation 2010. I have a requirement wherein I need to connect to SQL in some other server.
    I used BCS to create external content type and then I created an external list. now when I try to view the list on browser it says "Login failed for the user NT AUTHORITY\ANONYMOUS LOGIN".
    I am using "User's Identity" for authentication with SQL.
    How can solve this issue. Please help.
    any help is greatly appreciated.
    Thanks.

    That sounds like you might not be using Kerberos and/or your Kerberos authentication isn't working to pass your credentials.
    As you may know there's a limitation with NTLM permissions that prevents something known as the 'double hop'. This is where a server (SharePoint for example) tries to request things on your behalf. With NTLM you can't do this at all, the alternative is to
    use Kerberos which can handle double hops. One thing to know about Kerberos, if it's not completely set up right then IIS and SharePoint will almost always revert to NTLM so it's easy to think you've enabled it only to discover it's failing and you're really
    using NTLM.
    This guide will take you through setting up Kerberos in painful detail, it's great:
    http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=23176

  • Use of 0REFPER in multiprovider reporting with virtual provider in BCS

    Hi all,
    We're using the multiprovider reporting option in BCS 6.0 / BI7.
    As you may know the data in the 'closed periods' provider is populated with closed requests, which need not necessarily be for individual periods (this is different to BCS 4/BW3.5)
    As far as I understand from my discussion with the BI team, in the 'closed periods' provider each reference period is populated with ALL data for the year (so a January record appears in 0refper = 01,2008 and also 0refper = 02,2008, whereas a February record only appears in 0refper = 02,2008).
    Reporting on a specific reference period will provide data relevant to the hierarchies effective at that reference period.
    BUT when the virtual provider is taken in to account for March, surely the reference period is now 03,2008 - so how will the multiprovider choose any records from the 'closed periods' cube?
    What I'm not sure about is how the BI report should be structured in terms of 0REFPER selection to ensure that the relevant closed period data is selected alongside the virtual provider data.
    I haven't found anything in the help documentation, or the SDN forum - has anyone found a useful source of guidance from SAP?
    If not, has anyone got experence of this?
    (of course, points will be provided for all useful answers).

    Thanks Dan,
    I would caution about the use of 0refper for the multiprovider scenario.
    Have you used the multiprovider scenario? There is good documentation from SAP on how to set it up but nothing on how the queries/reports should be built. When BCS generates the multiprovider and virtual provider, it adds in 0refper (and the others)
    It is my understanding that the closed-period records are stored with cons group as opposed to those of the virtual infoprovider where cons group is only included for posting levels 02, 12, 22 and 30.
    + Thus if the organization/cons groups are changed, it could cause reporting issues unless the closed-period infoprovider is repopulated using the new or changed cons groups.+This was my understanding too, but the BI team are telling me it is NOT required in BCS 6 / BI7.
    I will investigate further an post my analysis back here.
    In the meantime if anyone else has experience of the multiprovider scenario reporting, espcially in BCS 6 / BI7. Then please do post your experiences here.

Maybe you are looking for