Bdoc state E08 , Mapping Error , BUS_TRANS_MSG

SAP CRM
trx:- SMW01
Bdoc Error
Bdoc State --> E08
Bdoc state Descriptin --> Mapping Error
Bdoc Type --> BUS_TRANS_MSG
How to resolve this error

Hello Aup,
What is the BDoc Type you are talking about?
Click on Error/Receiver tab and check for the exact error message.
If you give me the details,I can help you solving this Mapping Error.
Thanks and Best Regards,
Shanthala Kudva.

Similar Messages

Mapping error in BDOCS

Hi Experts
Daily we have BDOCS with Bdoc state description "Mapping error" and following errormessage "Processing of document with Guid DEE4C70ABC20D1F18A4900101825B820 is canceled" and " Validation error occurred: Module CRM_DOWNLOAD_BTMBDOC_VAL, BDoc type BUS_TRANS_MSG.
When we reproces the Bdoc it works and the error dissapears.
The errormessage is not very informative so we don't know what the original error is and we would like to avoid the reprocessing of the BDOCS.
Do you know the rootcause and how to avoid these errors?
best regards
Jørgen Jensen

Please check the following OSS note and implement the corrections that are suggested.
SAP Note 629016 - Automatic restart of BUS_TRANS_MSG

BDoc Mapping Error

Hi All
I am facing a problem is Business partner download from ECC to CRM.
The Initial Load on CUSTOMER_MAIN is successful and the 2 BPs got replicated to CRM.
But, the Initial Load on CUSTOMER_REL has failed (R3AI_CUSTOMER_REL Queue in SYSFAIL state). The BDoc shows a Mapping Error.
Error Details : Technical error occurred (7)
Forward to this, when I create a new BP in ECC, Delta is triggered, but the BP is not created in CRM and the BDoc has the same Mapping Error as above.
Pl help.
Thanks in advance
Regards
Sushanth

Pls slect the BDOC in SMW01 and select the button wHich says 'Show errors and receivers'. You will get popup and slect the radio button of errors. You will see the error. Pls validate and correct them.Then you can reprocess the BDOC.

Sales Document Mapping Error

Tcode SMW01 in SAP CRM
Bdoc Error
Bdoc State: E08
Bdoc Description: Mapping error
Bdoc Type: BUS_TRANS_MSG
Bdoc Detail Error Description: Business transaction type ZZZZ does not exist
The ZZZZ is a quotation transaction type maintained in ECC. But we donu2019t want this replicated in CRM, reason why ZZZZ is not maintained in CRM. The queues in SMQ2 is building-up with these error (R3AD_SALESD* with SYSFAIL status), is there a way to block, filter etc. this transaction type to exclude it from replication? Or other better way to address the problem?
Thanks in advance!

Hi Noel
try setting a filter on object SALESDOCUMENT in Transaction R3AC1.
Table=VBAK
Field = AUART( its a guess, can't check it in a system)
OP = NE> Not Euqal
Low = ZZZZ
save it. your filters wil also be updated to R/3
Hope it helps
best regards,
Remko

How to clear Mapping Error Bdocs

Hi,
We are getting Mapping error bdcos in SMW01 if there is an error while data is downloading from ECC to CRM. We are fixing the issue by looking at the BDOC error description. We are unable to re-process these error bdocs after fixing the issue as it is not allowing. To fix the issue we are re-processing the corresponding queue in SMQ2 and queues are processing successfully. the problem is these error bdocs are sitting in data base and we want to clear them.
Can any one please let me know how we can re-process these kind of mapping error bdocs?
Thanks,
Rajinikanth

Hi ,
Below logic may be useful.
SELECT bdoc_id
             bdoc_type
             bdoc_state
             snd_date
             snd_time
             qname
         INTO TABLE lt_inque
              FROM smw3_bdoc
              WHERE bdoc_type IN s_bdoc
              AND qname IN s_qname
              AND bdoc_state IN r_err.(r_err = E01,E02.....E09)
LOOP AT lt_inque INTO ls_inque.
DATA:lv_bdoc_id TYPE smog_tid.
CLEAR lv_bdoc_id.
lv_bdoc_id = ls_inque-bdoc_id.
CALL METHOD cl_smw_flow=>restart_processing
      EXPORTING
        bdoc_id            = lv_bdoc_id
      EXCEPTIONS
        bdoc_not_found     = 1
        bdoc_locked        = 2
        bdoc_was_processed = 3
        internal_error     = 4
        OTHERS             = 5.
ENDLOOP.
Thank you,
Gangadhar.S

Mapping Error in SXMB_MONI

Hi,
I am facing a mapping error in SXMB_MONI. When I test Message Mapping and Interface Mapping independently, the test executes successfully, displaying the expected output. However when I execute the scenario as a whole, I get an error in SXMB_MONI saying "Runtime Exception: Different length of queues in SortByKey"
Please help me regarding the same.
Thanks and Regards,
Tejal

Ref. to the help doc statement.
sortByKey -
Like sort, but with two inbound parameters to sort (key/value) pairs. The sort process can be compared to that of a table with two columns.
Using the first parameter, you pass key values from the first column, which are used to sort the table. If you have classified the key values as numeric in the function properties, they must not be equal to the constant ResultList.SUPPRESS. See also: The ResultList Object
Using the second parameter, you pass the values from the second column of the table.
If there is a discrepancy between the number of keys and values, the mapping runtime triggers an exception. The function returns a queue with the values sorted according to the keys.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/43/c4cdfc334824478090739c04c4a249/content.htm

Bdoc state - Received (intermediate state)

Hi experts,
Can you please help me with this. We've just found out that we have several bdocs with state "Received (intermediate state)" in middleware. They said that if these are in this state for quite some time, we need to reprocess it to prevent any future problems. When I choose one and click on Show Bdoc Msg Errors/Receivers, it only says "No receivers or error segments for Bdoc message found."
Can you please let us know how to clear these? I'm providing below two bdocs on these state that may help you understand the problem.
1.
Bdoc state description: Received (intermediate state)
Bdoc type: BUPA_REL
Flow context description: mBdoc Validate
Send date: 01.09.2010
Send time: 19:01:06
Sender site name: (This is our ECC box)
Queue name: R3AD_CUSTOMExxxxxxxxxx (x > customer number)
User (Creator): MWRFCXXX (x > our ECC box)
2.
Bdoc state description: Received (intermediate state)
Bdoc type: CND_M_SUP
Flow context description: mBdoc Validate
Send date: 09.02.2011
Send time: 15:43:04
Sender site name: (This is our ECC box)
Queue name: R3AD_DNL_COND_A594
User (Creator): MWRFCXXX (x > our ECC box)
Hope you can help us here. Thanks a lot!
Kind regards,
Mike

Hi,
Go to transaction R3AR3,Are all your requests still there.IS there any queue stuck in smq2 and SMQ1.If there is nothing stuck in SMQ1 or SMQ2,then i think for you Bdoc type BUPA_REL,for all those queues in intermediate state there is no number found for the range which you used to create request for Partner relationship.
Regards,
Arya

Mapping error in PI 7.1

Hi All,
When i am trying to create a new mapping or coyping the existing mapping(which is already activated) , i am not able to activate the mapping . I am getting the following error :
Source text of object Message Mapping: new |
urn:abc:MessageOut has syntax errors: Source code has syntax error:
Source strcuture and everything is perfect as i had created previous mapping using the same source structure.
Please advice as to what might be the issue here and what is the solution.
Regards
Vinay P.

In each and every mapping which is already avialble in IR and the new ones that i am trying to create ...i am getting the followin exception throughout if press F7 in the mapping ...as a result u cant actiavte any changes in the existing mapping nor in the new mapping
Error:
Source text of object Message Mapping:
Mapping name| urn:abc:namespace:SI_Interface has syntax errors: Source code has syntax error:
Regards
Vinay P.

Strange Data Mapping Errors after SEM 6 Upgrade. Please assist.

Hi All, I encountered these sudden Mapping errors after I tried to do Testing in Post Upgrade Sand Box. Here I am trying to to perform Collected Reported Financial Data under Data Collection Method for a particular Company Code 3040. Kindly help me with some quick responses as this is kind of high priority. The errors and the Diagnosis Notes I am unable to follow as I do not where I shall write those Mapping Rules they are referring to. I do not even know if that need to apply any SAP Notes as such. Once again Highly appreciate your quick response and Many Thanks in Advance.
Regards, BIP
Input conversion for field Period Value LC has invalid format Message no. UCT8210 Diagnosis The mapping rule for target field Period Value LC contains a move with a selected Input Conversion indicator. Therefore, the system performs an input conversion prior to creating the target data. However, an error in the input conversion occurred while moving the source key figure to the target key figure Period Value LC. This means that the format used for the input conversion is incompatible with the target data. System Response The system will not perform the move. Procedure Examine the mapping rule for field Period Value LC. Either select the Conversion Exit indicator or deselect the Input Conversion indicator. Execute the method again. -
3040 is incompatible with input format for field /1FB/COMPANY Message no. UCT8258 Diagnosis During execution, the method derives the source selection for source field /1FB/COMPANY from the mapping rule for the target field. 3040 is one of the values that were derived for the source selection. The system requires that this value is in the correct SAP-internal format because the Conversion Exit indicator has been selected in the move operator for field /1FB/COMPANY. However, the value 3040 is incompatible with the SAP-internal format. System Response The system attempts to interpret value 3040 as an external format and convert it to the internal format. If this fails, the system is unable to restrict the source selection using source field /1FB/COMPANY. In this case, the system may read more source data than was originally intended, which can affect performance. Procedure In the log, choose the Source button to display the source selections that are used to read the source data. When this appears, examine values selected for field /1FB/COMPANY. If the correct values were selected, you can ignore this message. To prevent this message from being issued, you can select the indicator in the mapping rule used by source field /1FB/COMPANY. If incorrect values were selected, make sure that the mapping rule used by source field /1FB/COMPANY has been defined correctly. If the mapping rule is correct and value (3040) derived for the source selection does not affect the overall result, you can ignore this message. If the source selection does not contain the value 3040 for field /1FB/COMPANY and, because of this, source data that is supposed to be read is not being read, make sure that the mapping rule has been defined correctly. If the source selection does not contain any value for field /1FB/COMPANY, make an estimation as to how much excess source data is being read and whether this might affect system performance. If you do not expect any performance problems, you can ignore this message. In any event, you have the following alternatives if the mapping rule is defined correctly, but the source selection on field /1FB/COMPANY is unsatisfactory: You can define a source selection for field /1FB/COMPANY in the Customizing settings for the method on the Selection tab page. Then the method uses this source selection instead of the source selection derived from inverse interpretation of the mapping rule. You can implement the Business Add-In (BAdI) UC_DATATRANSFER and use the method INVERT to determine the source selection on field /1FB/COMPANY. Then the method uses the result of the INVERT method for the source selection instead of the source selection derived from inverse interpretation of the mapping rule. -
Cannot derive the source selection from target field Version Message no. UCT8252 Diagnosis Field Version has one of the following roles: Consolidation unit Group currency key Fiscal year Posting period Version To delimit the volume of the source data to be read, the system usually derives the source selection from the target selection of such a field. However, the system cannot derive a source selection from field Version. System Response It is possible that a greater volume of source data is being read than is necessary. This can lead to performance issues. Procedure Check whether a mapping rule is defined for field Version. If a mapping rule is defined, you can disregard this warning message. However, if you discover after method execution that the system did not process a large amount of data, and that system performance was not satisfactory, you may want to examine the source selection by choosing the Source button in the log. If the reason for the disregarded data is that too much source data was read because of the unrestricted selection on the source field (which is linked with target field Versionthrough mapping), choose one of the alternatives below: Change the mapping rule for field Version so that the system can derive a delimiting source selection. Implement the Business Add-In (BAdI) UC_DATATRANSFER with the method INVERT to delimit the selection for the source field that is linked via mapping to the target field Version. -
Cannot derive the source selection from target field Group Currency Message no. UCT8252 Diagnosis Field Group Currency has one of the following roles: Consolidation unit Group currency key Fiscal year Posting period Version To delimit the volume of the source data to be read, the system usually derives the source selection from the target selection of such a field. However, the system cannot derive a source selection from field Group Currency. System Response It is possible that a greater volume of source data is being read than is necessary. This can lead to performance issues. Procedure Check whether a mapping rule is defined for field Group Currency. If a mapping rule is defined, you can disregard this warning message. However, if you discover after method execution that the system did not process a large amount of data, and that system performance was not satisfactory, you may want to examine the source selection by choosing the Source button in the log. If the reason for the disregarded data is that too much source data was read because of the unrestricted selection on the source field (which is linked with target field Group Currency through mapping), choose one of the alternatives below: Change the mapping rule for field Group Currency so that the system can derive a delimiting source selection. Implement the Business Add-In (BAdI) UC_DATATRANSFER with the method INVERT to delimit the selection for the source field that is linked via mapping to the target field Group Currency
1 is incompatible with input format for field FISCPERIOD Message no. UCT8258 Diagnosis During execution, the method derives the source selection for source field FISCPERIOD from the mapping rule for the target field. 1 is one of the values that were derived for the source selection. The system requires that this value is in the correct SAP-internal format because the Conversion Exit indicator has been selected in the move operator for field FISCPERIOD. However, the value 1 is incompatible with the SAP-internal format. System Response The system attempts to interpret value 1 as an external format and convert it to the internal format. If this fails, the system is unable to restrict the source selection using source field FISCPERIOD. In this case, the system may read more source data than was originally intended, which can affect performance. Procedure In the log, choose the Source button to display the source selections that are used to read the source data. When this appears, examine values selected for field FISCPERIOD. If the correct values were selected, you can ignore this message. To prevent this message from being issued, you can select the indicator in the mapping rule used by source field FISCPERIOD. If incorrect values were selected, make sure that the mapping rule used by source field FISCPERIOD has been defined correctly. If the mapping rule is correct and value (1) derived for the source selection does not affect the overall result, you can ignore this message. If the source selection does not contain the value 1 for field FISCPERIOD and, because of this, source data that is supposed to be read is not being read, make sure that the mapping rule has been defined correctly. If the source selection does not contain any value for field FISCPERIOD, make an estimation as to how much excess source data is being read and whether this might affect system performance. If you do not expect any performance problems, you can ignore this message. In any event, you have the following alternatives if the mapping rule is defined correctly, but the source selection on field FISCPERIOD is unsatisfactory: You can define a source selection for field FISCPERIOD in the Customizing settings for the method on the Selection tab page. Then the method uses this source selection instead of the source selection derived from inverse interpretation of the mapping rule. You can implement the Business Add-In (BAdI) UC_DATATRANSFER and use the method INVERT to determine the source selection on field FISCPERIOD. Then the method uses the result of the INVERT method for the source selection instead of the source selection derived from inverse interpretation of the mapping rule
Input must be in the format ___,___,__~ Message no. 00088 Diagnosis Your entry does not match the specified input format. System Response The entry in this field was rejected. Procedure The entry must comply with the edit format. The following edit format characters have a special meaning: "_" (underscore) There should be an input character at this point; this should be a number for numeric fields. "." (decimal point) (applies to numeric fields) The decimal point occurs here (setting in the user master record). "," (thousands separator) (applies to numeric fields) This separator occurs (optionally) for more than three figures. Depending on the setting in the user master record, it can be a period or a comma. "V" (applies to numeric fields) The operational sign appears here. If used, it must by at the right margin of the field. The sign is either "-" or " "(space). "~" (tilde) (applies to numeric fields) As of and including this character, leading zeros must also be entered. Otherwise, this character has the same meaning as an underscore. Leading zeros need not be entered on the left of the tilde. They are not output at this position. All other characters have their normal meanings and must be entered in the same position as in the edit format.

Hi Dan,
Could you Kiindly advise me where we need to write the Mapping Rules in Consolidation Monitor? All he time the errors refering to Mapping Rules. The only Tab I seen "Mapping" is in Data Basis But as per my Understanding Iwe do not have much to do there as it is system generated Mapping Tab.
Where we actually go and select/deselct those Input Conversion Indicator/ Conversion exit Indicator.
Highly appreciate your advise.
Thanks and Regards,
BIP

Java.util.EmptyStackException Mapping error

Hi All,
I am integrating SAP ECC 6.0 system with SAP SNC.
For these i am using standard content of SAP SNC
I am getting following mapping error :
TransformerConfigurationException occurred when loading XSLT InvoiceRequest_InvoicInvoic01_01.xsl; details: Could not load stylesheet.com.sap.engine.lib.xml.util.NestedException: Error parsing query. -> java.util.EmptyStackException
Plz help me out
Regards Milan

hi,
check the interaface mapping which is used in your flow
inside integration repository - is it working over there?
do you see the XSL file in the external archives in repository?
Regards,
Michal Krawczyk
http://mypigenie.com XI/PI FAQ

Multi-Mapping Error after copying into new namespace

Hi everybody,
we got a BPM running using a multi-mapping.
We decided to design new namespaces. After copying every IR object (datatype, message-type, mappings etc.) --> SXMB_MONI shows a mapping-error.
But when I take the payload and test the mapping, everything is fine?
Any ideas?
Regards Mario

Hi,
If your payload has Messages tab remove that..and test the payload.
Payload doesn't have any Messages tab.
Just i have given example payload..this payload two strucures it will split into twofiles..and compare your payload should be like same
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<STRUCTURE>
<EMP_DETAILS>
 <EMPNO>123<EMPNO>
 <EMPNAME>XYZ<EMPNAME>
<EMP_DETAILS>
<STUDENT_DET>
 <STUO>123<STUNO>
 <STUNAME>XYZ<STUNAME>
</STUDENT_DET>
<STRUCTURE>
Regards,
Venu.

Catch Mapping Error in File to IDoc scenario

Configured BPM and now learning Error Handling. I know that through BPM we can handle system Errors, but I doubt whether Mapping error is a system error.
I am interested to know the classification of errors with examples, preferably listing out all types of errors.
Please provide some weblogs or explain briefly how to handle system and application errors through BPM.
Thanks,
Raja

Hi Raja,
You will need CCMS if you want to send the Alerts to external system or you want to access the ALerts from the transaction. You can capture your alerts without this also.
When you go to Alert Configuration in the Runtime Workbench you can see Create Alert Rules. These rules are pertaining to the error generated in your AF,AE or IE.
Once you have completed the whole config. The error happening in the AE, IE or AF would trigger the alert. you can see this in your Alert Inbox.
The best would be if you go through the URL I have mentioned below.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/80/942f3ffed33d67e10000000a114084/content.htm
You have to use BPM only if you want to do an activity after the alerts are raised.
Regards
Vijaya
Message was edited by: vijaya kumari

Mapping Error in XI Configuration for MM-SUS Scenario

Dear Experts,
I am working on MM-SUS Classic Scenario,
We have done all basic setting in SRM, ECC and SUS.
Now we are configuring XI Scenario(Working on ESOA Architecture), while configuring XI Scenario, I follow the mention steps :
I have started from Integration Builder in XI (using T-code SXMB_IFR)
1. I have assigned two Business System( for ECC and SUS) In integration Builder (Creates Communication Channels Automatically) .
2. Modify IDOC and XI Communication in ERP and SUS Business system respectively.
3. Now select Tools -> Transer Integration Scenario from Inegration Repository and Create Scenario in it properly
(Included Assign Services, Configure Connections, Generate etc).
4. In last, save scenario.
After configuration XI I am not getting Scenario Data (Objects and Configuration Overview data) in it.
When i click to Check Configurability under Model Configurator of mine Scenario, I found following Errors ( I am Mentioning only some errors) :
Component View SE_Services_Procurement: Connection from Send Z_CREMAS_SUSMM to Business Partner empfangen has no mapping
Component View SE_Services_Procurement: Connection from Send_PO_From_MM to Receive_Purchase_Order has no mapping
Component View SE_Services_Procurement: Connection from ServiceAcknowledgementConfirmationRequest to ServiceAcknowledgementConfirmationCreate has no mapping
Component View SE_Services_Procurement: Connection from InvoiceRequest senden to Receive INVOIC has no mapping
Kindly correct me if am missing some, and help me out, what should have been done to remove this mapping errors.
Thanks in advance,
Regards,
Pawan Keshwani

If you are on >= SP9 you do not need to perform that action at all.
Go to SU01 transaction assign SAP_XI_DEVELOPER role for the desired users and try it.
regards
Shravan

Mapping Error in AAE in PI 7.1

Dear Team,
If we use message mapping along with AAE concept , What are the objects we need to create in ESR and ID .
How can we monitor the messages - messages failed with Mapping Error.Is there any new option available in RWB?
Thanks&Regards
Drumi

Hi,
ESR Objects are same but in ID we need to create Integrated configuration
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/700058f0-b1a1-2a10-39a8-ab2627b87cfa
If we are using AAE then we don't get any status in SXMB_MONI.
Regards,
Venkata Ramesh

Mapping error in PI 7.4 dual stack

Dear Experts,
Recently we upgraded our system from PI 7.1 to PI 7.4 dual stack.
Scenerio is ECC->PI->SOAP(Webservice) synchronous
Issue in detail:
We are creating a invoice in ECC system through PI its updating in third party site using SOAP webservice and will get a reference number from that site and then updating in ECC as in synchronous way.
Invoice data's are reached PI sucessfully from ECC but it not updating in the site and getting below mapping error after upgarded to PI 7.4.
Your points will be highly appreciable.
Kindly help to sort out this issue.
Best Regards,
Monikandan

Hi Monikandan,
It seems you are trying the sign the payload in your java mapping. So, looking at the attached error, there could be 2 possibilities:
1) Either there is no certificate with alias: *_PRD
2) This certificate is stored in some "System" type keystore view which is not accessible from you mapping code. Try to move your certificate to some "User" keystore view.
Thanks & regards,
Piyush

Bdoc state E08 , Mapping Error , BUS_TRANS_MSG

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for