Beachballs & Hangups with large images in CC.

I wasn't having this issue in CS6, and then I upgraded to CC. I couldn't work with large image files on my art board. I'd always beach ball while copying an image! It was crapping out my workflow, and I have more than enough ram and processing power.
Solution:
Turns out the primary reason for the hang-ups was caused by the 'included SVG code' option (which doesn't exist in CS6) in the File Handling Preference. I unchecked it, and it's been smooth sailing since.
I hope this helps someone!

Well, your resolution in Photoshop has only some relation to the size of your document in InDesign. Perhaps CS4 has something new that CS3 doesn't, but I can't set an Indy doc to 1027 x 768 pixels; the only measurements I get are things like picas, inches, and other non-screen measurements.
When working in Photoshop (really not my strong point), you have control over both the image size and the canvas size, right? And one of the values you're working with is going to be pixels per inch, no? I'm guessing that a Photoshop image with a size of 1024 x 768 pixels at 72 ppi (screen resolution) is what you are placing in an InDesign document, which is simply not going to display that information at 72 ppi. It'll probably display it at 300 ppi, or something similar, no?
This just shows you my basic ignorance of Photoshop. However, even someone as PS-impaired as myself knows that you can set the image size and canvas size in Photoshop, and this will control your number of pixels per inch. If you save a PSD or a TIFF out of PS, and you have your canvas and image settings correct, then you'll get a good idea onscreen of how large your image is inside your ID document, and what your resolution will be. In fact, InDesign will merrily let you place PSDs at whatever resolution you set up in PS. So, to sum up:
1) Your image is being placed at a print-level resolution, which is why it's so small
2) You determine the resolution of your image in Photoshop
3) Bob's question bears repeating: 1024 whats?

Similar Messages

Illustrator Image Trace doesn't work with large images

Illustrator's Image Trace doesn't seem to work at all with large images. The attached image shows the following:
A) The original raster cropped tightly.
B) Converting the raster with default "Black and White Logo" settings. Results in 242 paths and 4792 anchors.
C) Adding a massive amount of white space and then converting the raster with default "Black and White Logo" settings. Results in 407 paths and 1620 anchors.
For whatever reason Illustrator can't seem to handle large images. This test shows it's not an issue with the image being too complex since all I've done is add white space and the file was saved without compression so there should be no noise.
This type of glitch started with CS6 with the new Image Trace tool. Is there a fix for this? Maybe setting Image Trace into legacy mode?

Moving to Illustrator forum.

Problem converting XPS document with large images

Hi,
When I try to convert XPS documents to PDF in Acrobat 9.0 Pro, I have problems with "large images". They are either truncated or scaled down. The only images that convert correctly are small images that are not stretched to fill a large area. Attached to this message is a simple example. Does anyone know a way to correct this problem? By the way, the page is slightly larger than the standard Letter size.
Thanks!

Thanks for your suggestion! In fact, I am the programmer who creates the XPS files from a .NET document. Our company used the method "Postscript + PDF" during a few months and it worked quite well. Recently, we introduced semi-transparent objects and fonts in our documents and the resulting PS prints look really bad. Since I can create a perfect XPS document, and since Acrobat can convert it to PDF, I gave it a try. It solved all the problems that I had with PS printing but there is that thing with images... Anyway, since Acrobat converts XPS to PDF, I guess they should try to solve the bug with the images. As for me, I will see if I can get a component to create PDF documents directly from our application.

Spot removal tool lethargy with large image

Question: is there a way to speed up Spot Removal in my circumstance?
Background: 16-bit 4x5 scanned B & W image - 1.04GB .dng file
Win 7, 64-bit, 12 GB RAM, dual CPUs
With large images, spot removal is very slow, and becomes exceedingly slow as the number of spots increases.
I have Lightroom 5 configured to use 10 GB cache
I have cleared the cache, closed other apps, re-booted windows, with no increase in speed
Windows task manager reports 0-35% cpu load, 4-6GB RAM used including the 1.5 GB consumed by the OS
I do know that file size may be an issue -- Lightroom reported that a 1.32GB image is too large to load.
What will work, if anything, to speed this up?

PS CS5 and Camera Raw 6.x don't support the new features in LR 5. You need to use LR 'Edit in PS' and then select 'Edit a copy with Lightroom Adjustments.' Is that what you are doing? I'm using LR5.2 Final with PS CS6 and ASR 8.2 and it appears to work fine.
However I am expereincing the feathering issue with LR5.2 Spot Removal tool:
http://feedback.photoshop.com/photoshop_family/topics/lr_5_2_is_not_rendering_correctly_ph otos_with_spot_removal_applied_in_lr4

[BUG] Flash plug-in crash with large images, sometimes

Hello,
I've been working with using Pixel Bender shaders in Flash and have encountered plugin / browser crashes when using shaders on large images, but only on certain machines.
I've been unable to reproduce the crash on any machine I have physical access to, but was able to determine that it was caused by executing a shader on an image over 1028x1028 in size. I created a test Flash file (http://www.saltgames.com/?page_id=283) that runs a simple shader on gradually increasing image sizes. On most machines it will run fine, but on a few the Flash plugin (and possibly browser too, depending on the broswer) will lock up once it tries to render the 1500x1500 sized image.
One user reported that although it crashed when using Firefox or Chrome, in Internet Explorer on the same machine it was fine. I haven't been able to see a common feature in the set-ups that suffer this crash.
I had approximately 50 people test a Flash game that featured shaders operating on large images, and 4 reported a crash. Changing it to only run shaders on smaller image sizes seems to have fixed the crashes.

Hi,
0xe9000 - 0xebfff +net.culater.SIMBL 0.8.2 (8) /Library/InputManagers/SIMBL/SIMBL.bundle/Contents/MacOS/SIMBL
Follow the path: /Library/Input Managers. Move all the files in the Input Managers folder to the Trash.
Instant Hijack Server.hermesmodule/Contents/MacOS/Instant Hijack Server
If you have any browser enhancers like Unsanity's haxies, move them to the Trash.
Relaunch Safari.
Carolyn

While opening specific Document "Not enough Memory" while rendering the Document with Large Image

When Opening a PDF-File with a Large Image, the Adobe Reader and Acrobat will Crash while rendering with the Message Out of Memory.
After some investigations this error is reproducable on Windows 2008 R2 and 2012 R2 Machines running on HP ProLiant BL460c Gen8.
The Servers are updated with the latest Firmware from HP.
This error does not occure on a Virtual Machine running Windows 2008 R2, so it seems like a Hardware dependent Bug.
When disabling the Option Show large Images, the error will not Show up. But this is neither a solution nor a workarround, as we Need to Display all Information in the PDF.
Thanks for any Help

Hello SumitV
Thanks for your answer.
Indeed the Output File can be opened without any Errors. It's a good workarround, but it's not a solution.
Why does it work (and much faster) on a Virtual Machine, but not on a very Powerful HP Machine?
I hope Adobe will investigate in this case to solve it completely.
We have a test machine where we could install some debug tools, are there any to get a deeper analysis of this problem?
Thanks a lot.

Working with large images

i need to work with very large images (3000x3000 pixels) and they take a lot of memory (50MB). thing is that they don't use a lot of colors but they are loaded in memory with 24bit color model.
it is jpeg image and it is decoded to buffered image with standard jpeg decoder. i want to use buffered iamge because it is very simple to work with, however, i need to find a way to reduce memory consumption.
is it possible to somehow use different color model to reduce color count to 256, which is enough for me. i am clueless about imaging and i simple haven't got a time to get into it. i need some hints about this. i just want to know is it poosible (and how) to reduce size of BufferedImage in memory by decreasing it's number of colors.
i was thinking about using gif encoder, but it works with images, not bufferedimages and conversion takes lot of time and is not a solution.
thanx!
dario

You can create a byte indexed BufferedImage. This uses just 1 byte per pixel.
Use
public BufferedImage(int width,
int height,
int imageType,
IndexColorModel cm)
with
imageType == BufferedImage.TYPE_BYTE_BINARY
and create a color palette with
new IndexColorModel()

Working with large images in Motion 3

Hi, I'm trying to work with a large image that I am zooming in and out of and moving to different parts of it as a 3d layer, but Motion won't let it import at its full resolution. I don't mind working with a lower resolution as I animate stuff, but for the final output, it shouldn't matter if I'm using a larger image than 2896 pixels. That limit is bogus! I understand I can't expect to get speedy results, but to limit it entirely is ridiculous.
Am I missing something here? It seems there are a couple options. 1, use the vector version and uncheck the fixed resolution box, but that takes forever to render. 2, I can cut up the map into like 10 different squares that are under the limit, which is time consuming and ridiculous because if I make an edit to the original file, I'm going to have to re-cut it all out again.
Any tips people? I know I'm not the only one out there trying to do this kind of stuff in Motion! I'm really trying to do this all in Motion because it should be capable, but maybe I'm gonna have to go back into AfterEffects.

Am I missing something here? It seems there are a couple options. 1, use the vector version and uncheck the fixed resolution box, but that takes forever to render. 2, I can cut up the map into like 10 different squares that are under the limit, which is time consuming and ridiculous because if I make an edit to the original file, I'm going to have to re-cut it all out again.
Vector art? Really? Missed that in your OP. Forget the vectors; rasterize it in Illustrator to a TIFF at 3k pixels.
But you'll need to carefully evaluate your need for zooming in seamlessly. I think most of us get around the limits of our tools that butt up against our imaginations by artfully using delicate transitions from one resolution to the next.
Not knowing exactly what you're trying to do and what your screen presentation is expected to look like makes it difficult to suggest workarounds you would accept.
bogiesan

Need Oil Paint filter enhancement to work with large images

As Adobe is not supporting the Oil Paint filter with the next version of PhotoShop, can the code for this filter be made available for open source development?
I desperately need to utilize effects that can be created using Oil Paint, but I have to have the code altered so I can apply these effects to relatively large image sizes.
The current filter works fine for relatively small image sizes around 500kb or so, but has little or no effect on images of around 100mb.
I need to have this capability. I would like to have the code of the current filter altered to be able to achieve this.
I realize I will need to continue using PhotoShop 6 as the code will not be supported with the next version of PhotoShop.
If this is not the correct forum to post this, please let me know where I should be asking this question.
Thank you in advance for any insight and advice you may have.

What's the problem you're having with applying it to an 80 MB image? Is it that the effects don't scale up enough?
Technically it can run on large images if you have the computer resources... I've just successfully applied it to an 80 MB image, and with the sliders turned all the way up it looks pretty oil painty, though it kind of drops back into a realistic looking photo when zoomed out...
If it's just that the sliders can't go high enough, given that it's a very abstract look you're trying to achieve, have you considered applying it at a downsized resolution, then upsampling, then maybe applying it again? This is done that way...
Oh, and by the way, Oil Paint has been removed from Photoshop CC 2014, so if you're planning a business based on automatically turning people's large photos into oil paintings you should assume you'll be stuck with running the older Photoshop version.
-Noel

Flex file upload issue with large image files

     Hello, I have created a sample flex application to upload an image and also created java servlet to upload and save image and deployed in local tomcat server. I am testing the application in LAN. I am able to upload small as well as large image file(1Mb) from some PCs but in some other PCs I am getting IOError while uploading large image files however it is working fine for small images. Image uploading is hanging after 10%-20% and throwing IOError. *Surprizgly it is working Ok with XP systems and causeing issues with Windows7 systems*.
Plz give me any idea to get a solution.
In Tomcat server side it is giving following error:
request: org.apache.catalina.connector.RequestFacade@c19694
org.apache.commons.fileupload.FileUploadBase$IOFileUploadException: Processing of multipart/form-data request failed. Stream ended unexpectedly
        at org.apache.commons.fileupload.FileUploadBase.parseRequest(FileUploadBase.java:371)
        at org.apache.commons.fileupload.servlet.ServletFileUpload.parseRequest(ServletFileUpload.ja va:126)
        at flex.servlets.UploadImage.doPost(UploadImage.java:47)
        at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:637)
        at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:717)
        at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.j ava:290)
        at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:206)
        at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:233)
        at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:191)
        at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:127)
        at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:102)
        at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:109)
        at org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:293)
        at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11AprProcessor.process(Http11AprProcessor.java:877)
        at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11AprProtocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.process(Http11AprProto col.java:594)
        at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.AprEndpoint$Worker.run(AprEndpoint.java:1675)
        at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:722)
Caused by: org.apache.commons.fileupload.MultipartStream$MalformedStreamException: Stream ended unexpectedly
        at org.apache.commons.fileupload.MultipartStream$ItemInputStream.makeAvailable(MultipartStre am.java:982)
        at org.apache.commons.fileupload.MultipartStream$ItemInputStream.read(MultipartStream.java:8 86)
        at java.io.InputStream.read(InputStream.java:101)
        at org.apache.commons.fileupload.util.Streams.copy(Streams.java:96)
        at org.apache.commons.fileupload.util.Streams.copy(Streams.java:66)
        at org.apache.commons.fileupload.FileUploadBase.parseRequest(FileUploadBase.java:366)
UploadImage.java:
package flex.servlets;
import java.io.*;
import java.sql.*;
import java.util.*;
import java.text.*;
import java.util.regex.*;
import org.apache.commons.fileupload.servlet.ServletFileUpload;
import org.apache.commons.fileupload.disk.DiskFileItemFactory;
import org.apache.commons.fileupload.*;
import sun.reflect.ReflectionFactory.GetReflectionFactoryAction;
import javax.servlet.*;
import javax.servlet.http.*;
public class UploadImage extends HttpServlet{
         * @see HttpServlet#doGet(HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponse
         *      response)
        protected void doGet(HttpServletRequest request,
                        HttpServletResponse response) throws ServletException, IOException {
                // TODO Auto-generated method stub
                doPost(request, response);
        public void doPost(HttpServletRequest request,
                        HttpServletResponse response)
        throws ServletException, IOException {
                PrintWriter out = response.getWriter();
                boolean isMultipart = ServletFileUpload.isMultipartContent(
                                request);
                System.out.println("request: "+request);
                if (!isMultipart) {
                        System.out.println("File Not Uploaded");
                } else {
                        FileItemFactory factory = new DiskFileItemFactory();
                        ServletFileUpload upload = new ServletFileUpload(factory);
                        List items = null;
                        try {
                                items = upload.parseRequest(request);
                                System.out.println("items: "+items);
                        } catch (FileUploadException e) {
                                e.printStackTrace();
                        Iterator itr = items.iterator();
                        while (itr.hasNext()) {
                                FileItem item = (FileItem) itr.next();
                                if (item.isFormField()){
                                        String name = item.getFieldName();
                                        System.out.println("name: "+name);
                                        String value = item.getString();
                                        System.out.println("value: "+value);
                                } else {
                                        try {
                                                String itemName = item.getName();
                                                Random generator = new Random();
                                                int r = Math.abs(generator.nextInt());
                                                String reg = "[.*]";
                                                String replacingtext = "";
                                                System.out.println("Text before replacing is:-" +
                                                                itemName);
                                                Pattern pattern = Pattern.compile(reg);
                                                Matcher matcher = pattern.matcher(itemName);
                                                StringBuffer buffer = new StringBuffer();
                                                while (matcher.find()) {
                                                        matcher.appendReplacement(buffer, replacingtext);
                                                int IndexOf = itemName.indexOf(".");
                                                String domainName = itemName.substring(IndexOf);
                                                System.out.println("domainName: "+domainName);
                                                String finalimage = buffer.toString()+"_"+r+domainName;
                                                System.out.println("Final Image==="+finalimage);
                                                File savedFile = new File(getServletContext().getRealPath("assets/images/")+"/LowesFloorPlan.png");
                                                //File savedFile = new File("D:/apache-tomcat-6.0.35/webapps/ROOT/example/"+"\\test.jpeg");
                                                item.write(savedFile);
                                                out.println("<html>");
                                                out.println("<body>");
                                                out.println("<table><tr><td>");
                                                out.println("");
                                                out.println("</td></tr></table>");
                                                try {
                                                        out.println("image inserted successfully");
                                                        out.println("</body>");
                                                        out.println("</html>");
                                                } catch (Exception e) {
                                                        System.out.println(e.getMessage());
                                                } finally {
                                        } catch (Exception e) {
                                                e.printStackTrace();

It is only coming in Windows 7 systems and the root of this problem is SSL certificate.
Workaround for this:
Open application in IE and click on certificate error link at address bar . Click install certificate and you are done..
happy programming.
Thanks
DevSachin

Thumbs with Large Image and Text/Links

Hi,
I am running some script on the link below to try and get a look of when you click a thumbnail the large image and text that goes with it changes with each different thumb. I am able to do that right now, but not to the affect that I want.
Ideally I would like all the text to be on the right hand side of the image with spacing and links, but I seem to only be able to get the text to show itself on the bottom of the picture right now. I think I need to approach it in a different way then I am currently. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
This is the page I am working on - http://mnkr.com/womens_stylepages/bigsur_TEST
Please let me know if I can offer up any other info.
Kandace

Sorry to keep replying to my own post, but I am trying to work on this in the meantime.
I am currently trying to get this to work through this forum - http://forums.adobe.com/message/4001227?tstart=0
This is what I have done so far and I think I am on on the right track?.
http://mnkr.com/womens_stylepages/bigsur_TEST2

Troubles with Large Images in CS4

I am having a problem with importing larger images in InDesign CS4. I need to be able to put a full page image in my product. Smaller images are not a problem at all. Actually, I am having a couple issues.
First, my ID doc is 1024x768. When I resize an image in Photoshop to those dimensions and then import it into ID, all I get is a little tiny box. What am I doing wrong? I have tried mixing the image size up a bit with several different configurations, but then all I get is a little bit bigger box.
My main problem is when I do get an image that is large enough, it is very blurry, almost pixelated. I have no idea what is the cause of this and would greatly appreciate a response. Thanks in advance.

Well, your resolution in Photoshop has only some relation to the size of your document in InDesign. Perhaps CS4 has something new that CS3 doesn't, but I can't set an Indy doc to 1027 x 768 pixels; the only measurements I get are things like picas, inches, and other non-screen measurements.
When working in Photoshop (really not my strong point), you have control over both the image size and the canvas size, right? And one of the values you're working with is going to be pixels per inch, no? I'm guessing that a Photoshop image with a size of 1024 x 768 pixels at 72 ppi (screen resolution) is what you are placing in an InDesign document, which is simply not going to display that information at 72 ppi. It'll probably display it at 300 ppi, or something similar, no?
This just shows you my basic ignorance of Photoshop. However, even someone as PS-impaired as myself knows that you can set the image size and canvas size in Photoshop, and this will control your number of pixels per inch. If you save a PSD or a TIFF out of PS, and you have your canvas and image settings correct, then you'll get a good idea onscreen of how large your image is inside your ID document, and what your resolution will be. In fact, InDesign will merrily let you place PSDs at whatever resolution you set up in PS. So, to sum up:
1) Your image is being placed at a print-level resolution, which is why it's so small
2) You determine the resolution of your image in Photoshop
3) Bob's question bears repeating: 1024 whats?

Next / previous image swap WITH larger image popup

Very simply what I need to do is almost identical to what you
see here:
http://www.java-scripts.net/javascripts/Slide-Show-Script.phtml
(scroll down to the animal pictures)
When you click "next" and "previous" the images swap through
a series
called "img1.gif" "img2.gif" and "img3.gif"
So far so good. However let us assume there is also a set of
images called
"img1_lrg.gif" "img2_lrg.gif" and "img3_lrg.gif" which are
larger
versions of those little thumbnails. I need for the
appropriate associated
large image to popup in its own window when the thumb is
clicked.
Has anyone a lead on something like that?
Thanks very much.

On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 17:59:37 +0000 (UTC), [email protected]
(Clay)
wrote:
>Very simply what I need to do is almost identical to what
you see here:
>
>
http://www.java-scripts.net/javascripts/Slide-Show-Script.phtml
>
>(scroll down to the animal pictures)
>
>When you click "next" and "previous" the images swap
through a series
>called "img1.gif" "img2.gif" and "img3.gif"
>
>So far so good. However let us assume there is also a set
of images called
>
>"img1_lrg.gif" "img2_lrg.gif" and "img3_lrg.gif" which
are larger
>versions of those little thumbnails. I need for the
appropriate associated
>large image to popup in its own window when the thumb is
clicked.
>
>Has anyone a lead on something like that?
>
>Thanks very much.
That sounds simple, where are you stuck? Do you not know how
to open a
popup? BTW, the JustSo Picture Window extension would be
perfect for
the popups.

Best way to work with large image sequences

Hello,
Im relatively new to Adobe CS4. I am learning to create detailed animations with another software that produces thousands of still images. (I normally save them as .png, 720 x 480, 29.97 fps) I spent the money to buy CS4 becuase I was told this was what I needed to turn those images into video, add titles, captions, credits, etc. So far, I've been useing PremierPro to import the image sequences and add titles. But when I export the sequences, the quality is crap. I've tried all combinations of exporting formats, but even when I try to go for the greatest quality, my files are 100 MB large, and the quality is still crap (nice smooth lines are jagged, and details are blurry and pixilated, even with the titles I added). Can someone tell me how I should be working with these still image sequences so that I can retain the best quality while keeping the file size large. These videos are just played on local computer systems, not over a network or on DVDs. I dont know if I should be bringing the shorter clip sequences into AfterEffects and somehow exporting those. I just dont know. But nothing is working for me. Help!
Nikki

Hello!,
The output frame size has so far been the same as my rendering size (720 x 480), but I's just trying to get the best quality, if I need to render larger I can. Delivery has so far just been video, no audio, although when I get better at this I will record narrations of the animations and put that in. Playback is intended only for computers. Every once in a while, it is requested in a format that will be played over our network, but I wanted to worry about that later.
The preset I chose for the sequence was the DV-NTSC Standard 32kHz
The project/sequence settings are:
General
     Editing Mode: DV NTSC
     Timebase: 29.97 fps
Video
     Frame size: 720, 480 4:3
     Pixel Aspect Ratio: D1/DV NTSC (0.9091)
     Display Format: 30 fps Non-Drop-Frame Timecode
Audio
     doesnt matter
Video Previews
     Preview File Format: NTSC DV
     Codec: DV NTSC
     Maximum Bit Depth
Hope that was the information you requested.
Nikki

Firefox freaks out with large images

I know Firefox has its place among the slower browsers, but this is ridiculous. If I click on an image that has to be scaled, it's bye-bye to a responsive desktop. Three minutes later it appears, but it freaks out again when I try to close it, or switch windows, or anything. Yes, I know, it's a large picture, but I don't think it requires that much time. Konqueror and Kazehakase load it just fine, so I know it's a firefox problem. Couple other things, does anyone else have this problem? It's been going on for a while now, I just assumed that it would go away after an update. I unchecked the "load images automatically", but that removes all the images, which kinda kills the whole browsing experience. I use a lot of the Firefox features regularly, so I'd rather not switch. And believe me, I've tried.

skale wrote:I know Firefox has its place among the slower browsers, but this is ridiculous. If I click on an image that has to be scaled, it's bye-bye to a responsive desktop. Three minutes later it appears, but it freaks out again when I try to close it, or switch windows, or anything. Yes, I know, it's a large picture, but I don't think it requires that much time. Konqueror and Kazehakase load it just fine, so I know it's a firefox problem. Couple other things, does anyone else have this problem? It's been going on for a while now, I just assumed that it would go away after an update. I unchecked the "load images automatically", but that removes all the images, which kinda kills the whole browsing experience. I use a lot of the Firefox features regularly, so I'd rather not switch. And believe me, I've tried.
How big is the image and what are your system specs? Upload the image in question to a web host (http://xnr.be), so we can see if we expeirence any problems with it.
Edit: if its on your desktop from your sig, its because your out of ram as firefox is a ram hog. It uses 40-50mb ram alone on my system with just 1 page open, it increases to about 140mb ram with just 4-5 tabs open. I would say that you need at least 256MB to run firefox and you will still run out of ram for some things. Be sure your not running out of swap space space as well as ram, it is what is used when your ram is used up (However its alot slower).
Last edited by Ruckus (2007-04-28 04:30:31)

Beachballs & Hangups with large images in CC.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for