BED ECS AMOUNT IN MIGO HEADER IN LESS BY 10 TIMES

Hi Guys,
When I am processing the MIGO, in exise tab(Header/item) the amount of BED and ECS are 10 time less than the actual amount. Where as the Item details Excise tab it is correct as per the Purchase order.
Can some body tell me how/from where this header amount being calculated or flowed.
Thanks
Dhananjay

Please check the Basic Price Unit of Measure in PO conditions and check UOM if manual excise duty.
Regards
Bhavesh Mistry

Similar Messages

J2IUN is of less amount when compared to their payable GL's of BED, ECS a

Dear gurus,
For the month J2IUN amount less when compared to their payable GL's of BED, ECS.SECS.what is the resons for this and
Possible solution for the above.
Thanks
Venky

Correct, there is really no plan they offer that is uncapped just like they told you. The cell network data solutions are not meant to be used for home internet but to be something that is used occasionally for someone who needs mobile internet. And right again, congestion is one of the biggest problems LTE has caused for VZW Nashville, DC, Portland, Silicon Valley...

BED,ECS and SECess value not defaulted in J1IS for return purchase order.

1)I have created return purchase orde for an excisable material.
2) In the purchase order i am able to view the BED,ECS and SEcess values.
3) I have created MIGO, for the return purchase order with excise as part 1 only.
4) While doing J1is or the 161 material document number, the BED, ECS and SEcess values are not defaulted.
Kindly help me to solve this issue.
Regards,
jayakumar

Hi,
Check the settings in
Tax on Goods Movements --> India --> Account Determination
Specify Excise Accounts per Excise Transaction - Check for ETT OTHR
OTHR          CR Credit     PLAAED PLA AED account
OTHR          CR Credit     PLABED PLA BED account
OTHR          CR Credit     PLAECS PLA ECS Account
OTHR          CR Credit     PLASED PLA SED account
OTHR          CR Credit     RG23AED RG 23 AED account
OTHR          CR Credit     RG23AT1 RG 23 AT1 Account
OTHR          CR Credit     RG23BED RG 23 BED account
OTHR          CR Credit     RG23ECS RG 23 ECS Account
OTHR          DR Debit     MSUSP CENVAT suspense account
also check for Specify G/L Accounts per Excise Transaction
Regards,
Vikas Mayekar

Z report for BED, ECS VAT values

Hello Experts,
Here I have an issue we have developed the zreport for fetching the BED, ECS and Basic amount values for the particular Purchase orders with invoice posting dates as intial parameters.
The report is giving error for each line items...the values are jumping to other line items...cetain line items are correct. Please guide me how to make logic to pick particular line item values?
Existing logic
Pass BKPF-BELNR to BSET - BELNR and EKBE-BUZEI to BSET-TAXGRP
And condition types = u201CJVRD, JVCS, JVCN, JVRNu201D (hard coded) to BSET- GJAHR for VAT Value, u201CJMIP, JMIQ, JMOP, JMOQu201D for BED Value, and u201CJEX1, JEC3u201D for ECS value.
Thanks & Regards,
GANESH
Edited by: Jeyakanthan A on Nov 7, 2011 1:51 PM

Hi
*** BKPF-BELNR to BSET - BELNR and EKBE-BUZEI to BSET-TAXGRP
And condition types = u201CJVRD, JVCS, JVCN, JVRNu201D (hard coded) to BSET- GJAHR for VAT Value, u201CJMIP, JMIQ, JMOP, JMOQu201D for BED Value, and u201CJEX1, JEC3u201D for ECS value
you have to pass in BSET
BELNR
GJAHR-fiscal year it should be there
BUZE_ link to TAXPS in BSET
it will work
Regards
kaials Ugale

ECS AMOUNT IN J1IEX SHOWING IN Inventorized duty

Hi Guys,
ECS amount is shows as a Inventorized duty amount in Duty Vlaues tab of J1IEX T-CODE, where as I what it to be in Credit Availed amount.
Please guide how to make this setting.
Matter most urgent guys.
Thanks
Dhanu.

Guys,
We have not mentioned any % here.
while doing MIGO we directly eneter the invoice amount and Part 11 Post and capture the Modvat amount.
Now this amount is not reflecting in the above place as well as in Part II of J1IEX.
PLease help thanks,
Dhanu

New Tab is replacing the Excise Invoice tab on MIGO Header

Hi All,
I have Added new tab in MIGO Header,it is working fine, if i am doing MIGO for Excisable PO , then Excise Details tab is not appearing In my MIGO header (New Tab is replacing the Excise Detils Tab) and at my item level Exise item tab is dispaying.
I have Used BADI : MB_MIGO_BADI
At PBO_HEADER,
data: gf_class_id type migo_class_id.
gf_class_id = 'MIGO_BADI_IMPLEMENTATION_CIN'.
E_CPROG = 'ZMIGO_VENDTAB'.
E_DYNNR = '0001'.
E_HEADING = 'Vendor Details'.
Please help me.

Hello
Refer to below Code.
METHOD IF_EX_MB_MIGO_BADI~PBO_HEADER.
       CHECK I_CLASS_ID = GF_CLASS_ID.
       IF MIGO_HTAB = 'GR'.
         IF G_NO_INPUT IS INITIAL.
           E_CPROG   = 'SAPLZMIGBADI'.
           E_DYNNR   = '9000'.                     "External fields: Input
           E_HEADING = 'EXTRA GR'(001).
         ELSE.
           E_CPROG   = 'SAPLZMIGBADI'.
           E_DYNNR   = '9000'.                     "External fields: Input
           E_HEADING = 'EXTRA GR'(001).
         ENDIF.
       ENDIF.
       IF MIGO_HTAB = 'GI'.
         IF G_NO_INPUT IS INITIAL.
           E_CPROG   = 'SAPLZGDRCV'.
           E_DYNNR   = '9000'.                     "External fields: Input
           E_HEADING = 'EXTRA GI'(002).
         ELSE.
           E_CPROG   = 'SAPLZGDRCV'.
           E_DYNNR   = '9000'.                     "External fields: Input
           E_HEADING = 'EXTRA GI'(002).
         ENDIF.
       ENDIF.
       IF MIGO_HTAB = 'GR'.
         CALL FUNCTION 'ZMIGO_BADI_PUT_HEADER'
           EXPORTING
             IS_MIGO_BADI_HEADER_FIELDS = GS_EXDATA_HEADER.
       ENDIF.
       IF MIGO_HTAB = 'GI'.
         CALL FUNCTION 'ZMIGO_BADI_PUT_HEADER_GI'
           EXPORTING
             IS_MIGO_BADI_HEADER_FIELDS = GS_EXDATA_HEADER.
       ENDIF.
ENDMETHOD.
Abhinav Singh

How to Reduce BED Payable amount

Dear All,,
Kindly tel how to reduce BED Payble amount.
But I tried in J1IH AND J1IS but i am not able to reduce BED Paybale amount.And i passed Jv for that Gl account it only decrease Gl balance but not Decrease J2IUN balance.
Kindly suggest me how to come out of this
Thanks and Regards
Girish.

Dear,
In J2IU you have to utilize BED payable against the BED recoverable. Then net amount is paid in following steps,
Step 1. FB50, create document for payment of excise duty.
Step 2. Create TR6 challan through J1IH using above generated document number.
Regards,
Chintan Joshi.

Why Apple doesn't provide options in IOS to power off, reset, standby ipad/iPhone/ipod ? I don't se this opiton in IOS6 as well ? This option will help to avoid pressing power button less number of times and gives better user experience.

Why Apple doesn't provide options in IOS to power off, reset, standby ipad/iPhone/ipod ? I don't se this opiton in IOS6 as well ? This option will help to avoid pressing power button less number of times and gives better user experience.

They do.
Standby = press the Power button
Power off = Press and hold Power button then slide the red power off slider.
Reset = Press and hold both Reset adn Home till you see the Apple logo.
This option will help to avoid pressing power button less number of times and gives better user experience.
Because it is better to not push the power button and more enjoyable to not push it?

BED AND ECS AMOUNT IS MORE IN MIGO EXCISE HEADER TAB

Hi Guys,
When I am processing the MIGO, in exise tab(Header) the amount of BED and ECS are 10 time more than the acctual amount. Where as the Item details Excise tab it is correct as per the Purchase order.
Can some body tell me how/from where this headder amount being calculated or flowed.
Thanks
Dhanu

HI,
If you have done the GR against a PO which has multiple line items then the Excise values which appear in the Header is the summation of excise values for all the line items.
The excise values for each line item can be viewed in the item details of MIGO transaction.
Hope its clear.
Regards,

Error on BED,AED,SED in MIGO

Hi experts,
When i am working on MIGO and if i enter the Excise values on item level ( BED,SED,ECS) i am getting a DUMP error. I have asked all the ABAPers and they are unaware of it. I am not sure if it is a ABAP enhancement problem or MM problem.
The following is the error :
Runtime Errors         MESSAGE_TYPE_X
Date and Time          01.03.2012 16:55:29
Short dump has not been completely stored (too big)
Short text
    The current application triggered a termination with a short dump.
What happened?
    The current application program detected a situation which really
    should not occur. Therefore, a termination with a short dump was
    triggered on purpose by the key word MESSAGE (type X).
Error analysis
    Short text of error message:
    Balance in transaction currency
    Technical information about the message:
    Message classe...... "F5"
    Number.............. 702
    Variable 1.......... 00
    Variable 2.......... " 100.000"
    Variable 3.......... "INR"
    Variable 4.......... " "
Trigger Location of Runtime Error
    Program                                 SAPLMBWL
    Include                                 LMBWLU21
    Row                                     59
    Module type                             (FUNCTION)
    Module Name                             MB_POST_GOODS_MOVEMENT
Line SourceCde
   29 *    when a goods movement for an inbound or outbound delivery is posted
   30 *    directly from VL31N/ VL01N, XBLNR is not yet known when we call
   31 *    CKMV_AC_DOCUMENT_CREATE, but the number is supposed to be stored in
   32 *    BKPF as well. There is no other way to forward XBLNR to FI as not
   33 *    every document is posted by MB_CREATE -> a new function module in
   34 *    MBWL for transferring the information, called by FI, meant to load
   35 *    the complete function group for all MBxx postings when this isn't
   36 *    required (Performance). Would be the better way to transport the
   37 *    information after switching off MBxx in later release.
   38 *    corresponding IMPORT ... FROM MEMORY ... can be found in
   39 *    AC_DOCUMENT_POST (FORM FI_DOCUMENT_PREPARE (LFACIF5D))
   40      l_mem_id = 'MKPF-XBLNR'.                                   " 641365
   41      EXPORT xblnr = xblnr_sd TO MEMORY ID l_mem_id.             " 641365
   42    ENDIF.
   43    IF xmkpf-xabln IS INITIAL.                               "note 434093
   44        CALL FUNCTION 'MB_XAB_NUMBER_GET'.                   "note 434093
   45    ENDIF.                                                   "note 434093
   46
   47 ENHANCEMENT-POINT MB_POST_GOODS_MOVEMENTS_01 SPOTS ES_SAPLMBWL STATIC.
   48
   49 ENHANCEMENT-POINT MB_POST_GOODS_MOVEMENTS_02 SPOTS ES_SAPLMBWL.
   50    CALL FUNCTION 'MB_CREATE_MATERIAL_DOCUMENT_UT'
   51         EXCEPTIONS
   52           error_message = 4.
   53 * As soon as we have started to put things into UPDATE TASK, we must
   54 * ensure that errors definitely terminate the transaction.
   55 * MESSAGE A is not sufficient because it can be catched from
   56 * external callers which COMMIT WORK afterwards, resulting in
   57 * incomplete updates. Read note 385830 for the full story.
   58    IF NOT sy-subrc IS INITIAL.
>>>>>       MESSAGE ID sy-msgid TYPE x NUMBER sy-msgno WITH            "385830
   60                  sy-msgv1 sy-msgv2 sy-msgv3 sy-msgv4.
   61 *     MESSAGE A263.
   62    ENDIF.
   63 * Optische Archivierung
   64 * Spaete Erfassung mit Barcode
   65 * Redesign of barcode handling -> note 780365
   66   PERFORM barcode_update(sapmm07m) USING xmkpf-mblnr
   67                                          xmkpf-mjahr
   68                                          barcode.
   69
   70   MOVE-CORRESPONDING xmkpf TO emkpf.
   71   CALL FUNCTION 'MB_MOVEMENTS_REFRESH'
   72     EXCEPTIONS
   73       error_message = 4.
   74    MOVE-CORRESPONDING xmkpf TO emkpf.
   75    CALL FUNCTION 'MB_MOVEMENTS_REFRESH'
   76         EXCEPTIONS
   77           error_message = 4.
   78    IF NOT sy-subrc IS INITIAL.
any help will be useful guys.
thanks in advance guys

Hi,
It seems from the error that balance in transaction currency is the cause so try this
Go to OBYZ -> Procedures
Select the tax procedure you are using say TAXINN
Here for all your ED conditions type
Like JMOP,JMX1 for BED
JAOP,JAX1 for AED
also for all condition type E Cess ,HE cess ,VAT ,CST assign CalType --> 17 (Rounding As per T001R)
And save
Now go to SPRO-> IMG->SAP NetWeaver ->General settings ->Currencies ->Define rounding rules for currencies->
OR use OB90 directly
here maintain a entry For your company code ,Cureency (INR), Rounding unit (100)
Save the entry
Now try to run a new cycle you will find system is rounding off all the tax amounts
Please check and revert

Cenvatable BED & ECS not getting picked up in transaction ;J1IEX

Hi,
While capturing excise invoice for GR the Cenvatable BED and ECS percentage and value is not picked up automatically. Only the non-deductible CST value is shown.The Excise base amount is also appearing.
There are two errors:
1. Quantity could not be converted from NOS to "Message no. V1297".
2. PLA-AT2 amount 24.02.2007 is greater than available amount. "Message no. 8I659"
All relevant CIN masters are maintained.The base UOM in Material master is given in NOS (numbers).
Can anybody help me urgently?
Regards
Saikat Halder

Biswait,
Thanks for your reply.
I have maintained the Excise defaults in CIN customisation for our condition based tax procedure TSILTX. Under "A/P BED Cond." I have maintained JMOP condition type (Cenvatable) and under "ECS AP" I have maintained JECP condition type (Cenvatable).
The Education Cess (JECP) value is coming while I am doing Part-I during GR transaction (MIGO), but the BED value is still not appearing.
The help option on the field "A/P BED Cond." in SAP ECC6.0 says "Condition Type defined in Tax Procedure TAXINJ for Basix Excise Duty on Accounts Payable." . Shall this JMOP condition type work for here ?
Regards
Saikat Halder

Excise Base value and BED is wrong in MIGO while Depot

we are creating the PO for Depot, Tax code is NO ED setoff means
The BED is going to Inventory.
material is FERT material and Plant is DEPOT. we are using the conditions here are PB00some Z conditions and the BED is calculted on the PB00Z conitions ,
The BED and ECS and SEcess is shown in PO taxes tab correctly.
But when i go for MIGO "Create RG23D entry" the System will shown me the Double the BED and excise Base value is only taking the PB00 value, it is not taking the PB00+Z conditions why?
ECS and SEcess both are correct.
Here in PO the BED is calculted on PB00+Zconditions*....
In MIGO ....in Excise Item the BED % is showing me wrong values....It is not shwoing us the 14% correctly every time it is shown us different values
We are maintained the J1ID correctly for these........
After MIGO posting:
But the BED and remaing values are correctly shown in J1IDEPOTSTCOK1 tcode.
But when i saw the J_I1ECDHDR table the BED is Double and ECS and SECess both are correct
Why the BED is double and Excise base value wrong in MIGO...
Then I go for J1IG Here system is showing me Only BED i,e also wrong and it is not shwoing me ECS and SECess blank why?
Please kindly do the needful
Regards
sapman man

Please check ur setting of maintainexsice defaults.
BED condition type should be properly maintained.
regards,
Sujit

Excise Base value and BED is wrong in MIGO and J1IG

Hi,
we are creating the PO for Depot, Tax code is NO ED setoff means
The BED is going to Inventory.
material is FERT material and Plant is DEPOT. we are using the conditions here are PB00some Z conditions and the BED is calculted on the PB00Z conitions ,
The BED and ECS and SEcess is shown in PO taxes tab correctly.
But when i go for MIGO "Create RG23D entry" the System will shown me the Double the BED and excise Base value is only taking the PB00 value, it is not taking the PB00+Z conditions why?
ECS and SEcess both are correct.
Here in PO the BED is calculted on PB00+Zconditions*....
In MIGO ....in Excise Item the BED % is showing me wrong values....It is not shwoing us the 14% correctly every time it is shown us different values
We are maintained the J1ID correctly for these........
After MIGO posting:
But the BED and remaing values are correctly shown in J1IDEPOTSTCOK1 tcode.
But when i saw the J_I1ECDHDR table the BED is Double and ECS and SECess both are correct
Why the BED is double and Excise base value wrong in MIGO...
Then I go for J1IG Here system is showing me Only BED i,e also wrong and it is not shwoing me ECS and SECess blank why?
Please kindly do the needful
Regards
sapman man

Dear,
Use Z condition before PB00. The same should be statastical as PB00.
Check the excise default settings as well as,
Check the classify condition types
regards,
sujit

MIGO HEADER WRONG EXCISE VALUE

Hi,
While doing Migo with excise option, in the header excice tab, BED is calculating wrongly ..
Basic - Rs 1000
BED - 14% - Rs 1400 instead of Rs 140
where in item column, the exicse values are flowed correcly.
pls suggest, where is the mistake..

I am also facing the same problem any answers

Base amount in migo

Dear all,
I'm creatng a import po
Gross Price-1,314,117.00
IMP INSURANCE IN VAL-1,280.00
Landed Price-13,153.97
IN Basic customs-66,427.55
IN CVD-223,196.57
Ecess on In CVD-6,695.90
Customs ECess on TD-8,889.61
IN additional duty-65,350.43
Neg.Landed Price-13,153.97
but my querry is that what value should come at the time of MIGO -3rd header -excise item column -base value amount- (is what amount) .pls explain in detail points should be rewarded.
amin

hi,
it is the accessable value.
this value should be all the value till excise duty lavies.
if ur excise duty is laviable on insurance then taht value also will include.
duty % is calculated on that amt

BED ECS AMOUNT IN MIGO HEADER IN LESS BY 10 TIMES

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for