BED is Double in No ED setoff Conditions
Hello,
Such scenarioes of manual excise is also applicable for receipts in
depot. e.g. when duty is paid w.r.t MRP, RG23D needs to be updated with
MRP less abatement for excise base value (instead of PO base value) and
BED @ applicable rate on MRP less abatement. In PO, the ED payable
w.r.t. MRP less abatement is shown as Manual Excise. How do we address
this issue?
For This We are Creating the ZMRP condition type for materials.. in this condition type we are maintaining the MRP value of material.
And Created the ZABT condition type for abatement (38%) and maintained the records.
And mainatained the ZED% for calculation of ED which calculated on ZMRP-Abartment charge(Suppose MRP value is 100 INR & the 38% Abttement means 100-38 on 62 INR ED is calulated.for this
ZED% maintained for material and plant specific.. and Assigned the Subtotal 5 for this one.in Pricing
While in Setoff Tax code ED is calculted correct in Mfg plant as well as Depot.
But Depot is having the No ED setoff the ED is Becoming Double... The ZED% value is Adding the JMO2 value and Becoming double
Regards
Mahesh Naik
Dear Mahesh,
I am not clear in your problem but there is a work around. U should set the %of duties to match the total price in eg. now your problem is that ZED% is getting double. for this particular material temporarily set % of ZED in JM02 . Now you check by creating a PO and doing the GR and MIRO for the material received.
After the transaction is over u reset it back to the actual value. Check this senario and check that at this moment PO values should not be affected for other materials and try to avoid doing PO of other material till u finish this PO.
If the above is not working out u have to manipulate basic price and the conditions accordingly and create the PO so as to get the values to be adjusted for setoff.
We have faced this problem with BED as the basic price is given discount but the excise duty is charged according to the actual value.
Similar Messages
-
hi everybody
why we take setoff of excise duties at time of creation of purchase order like jmx1,jex1,how it effect the process
points will be rewarded
k.chhikaraHi
System first calculate BED amount based on your condition record for JMOP.JMX1 will be calculates settoff % against JMOP .
JMOP value depends on your material and decided by the goverment means for some product it is 16% and for some it is 32% like that.
But if suppose you are small scale industry and you are eligible for payment of 80 % of BED.
Then you have to maintain 80% for JMX1 which will in contrast calculate 80 % of your 16% BED value.
Means suppose you have 100rs value on which 16% means 16rs your BED then on this 16 rs system calculates 80% value like12.8 rs.means your net value will be your grossJMX1 ed valueST.10012.8ST.
Hope you will get it.
Regards
rb -
Double Booking against same freight condition In import PO.
Dear All,
I have a issue for import PO.Two freight forwarder have wrongly raised bills against the same consignment and the FI user book the both bill in MIRO.System allows the same and didn't give any error or warning message.My question is how i control the double booking of same amount ?
In SPRO-MM-LIV - Incoming InvoiceSet check for Duplicate invoice Indicator is set only for "Check Reference" and not for check company code and Invoice date. And our client user didn't maintain vendor in PO condition.But in MIRO they selects the condition and in Details tab>Invoicing .Party-- maintains the vendor and posts the MIRO.
Please Guide me ...
Regards
SachinHello Jeyakanthan,
I have set company code and invoice date.It helps a lot. Now system gives me message "Check if invoice already entered under accounting doc. no. 5100000069 2011 and Message no. M8108".But when i open this 510000069 2011 in MIR5 i didn't find any similarity in this and the one which i am posting.Is there any other way out? But i notice if i m posting the duplicate entry (i.e. 2nd MIRO) against the same qty,in MIRO under "Settled qty" i can see the qty which was posted earlier MIRO.Can we use this for reference and can arranged the settled qty column near qty column in MIRO. In PO/MIGO there is facility to set the sequence of column but not in MIRO..
Thanking you in advance.as usual your reply always helps a lot.
Regards
Sachin Thakur -
Manual excise for non setoff conditions
Dear sir,
i am purchasing certain matl from other unit of our company. Net price is actual stock trf price whereas assesable value for ED is greater than that. M using non set off conditions (jmip). Since net price & price for ED calculation is diferent m trying to use manual excise but system is calculating ED based on jmip condition record value. What should i do to capture actual ED. pl help.Hi,
To actual excise value
use tcode - J1IW
there you fill the required details then click on detail then you enetr the base value and the value you want to capture.
then select the line and save
thereafter
goto J1IEX and post the excise
Regards,
Vijay -
BED is Getting Double in MIGO while creating of RG23D entry
Hello,
While we have procuring some material to DEPOT directly from vendor. As per government rule we are maintaining the ZMRP and ZABT condition types in Pricing procedure
In Pricing procedure
10 ZMRP Step from 0 to 0
20 ZABT Step from 10 to 0
30 Sub total from 10 to 20
ZED% is calculted from this step "Amount for ED Calculation"
means the BED is calculted on MRP-38%Abartment charge.
means BED=ZMRP-ZABT%*14%
We have assigned Subtotal 5 against the ZED% condition in our pricing
procedure.We understand that subtotal 5 should not be used for non
deductible BED as it is used only for Deductible BED.But we are
procuring the same material in manufacturing plant as well therefore we
are using Subtotal 5 in the pricing procedure.
If we use ED setoff tax code then BED is taking correct value from JMO1
condition
In DEPOT the ZED% 14% from Pricing procedure and JMO2 from Tax procedure it is adding in MIGO Excise tab while creating the RG23D entry .why it is behaving like this
Please let us know Why it is behaving erraticaly in DEPOT?
Regards
Mahesh NaikPlease check ur setting of maintainexsice defaults.
BED condition type should be properly maintained.
regards,
Sujit -
Two Different conditions for BED in excise invoice
Dear Team,
I am using condition type JEXP condition type for automatic condition and for excise invoice, but for some specific cases my client wants to use one more condition for BED as manual condition where he want to enter BED amount as manual and ECS and HECS should calculate automatically on manual BED. He wants that other procedure with JEXP should be continue parallaly. But during the creation of excise invoice only one value is being passed to excise invoice for BED as I can maintain only one condition for "maintain excise defaults." In manual scenerio my ECS and HECS values are reflecting in excise invoice but BED is zero because at the place of BED JEXP is maintained in excise defaults. Kindly suggest how can I use both the scenerios to create excise invoice.
Regards,
NeerajHi
I have faced this problem in each of my projects. So sharing my idea of work around.
Create a Condtion type - ZMAN (Manual excise fixed amount ) and ZMEX for manual excise in percentage and adjust his just above you Excise condtion type .
100. ZMAN Statistical (Manual excise in Fixed Amount) Created Routine - 901
105 ZMEX Statistical (Manual excise in percentage ) Created Routine 901
110 JEXP (BED)
*If ZMAN is maintained then the KBETR (Amount) is copied to JEXP
*} INSERT
FORM FRM_KONDI_WERT_901.
*{ INSERT MCDK900627 1
*FORM FRM_KONDI_WERT_901.
DATA : ZMAN_KBETR TYPE KOMV-KBETR,
ZMAN_KWERT TYPE KOMV-KWERT,
ZMEX_KWERT TYPE KOMV-KWERT.
DATA : FLAG_ZMAN(1),
FLAG_ZMEX(1).
READ TABLE XKOMV WITH KEY KSCHL = 'ZMAN'.
IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
FLAG_ZMAN = 'X'.
ZMAN_KBETR = XKOMV-KBETR.
ZMAN_KWERT = XKOMV-KWERT. " CHANGE ON 3.7.2008
ENDIF.
READ TABLE XKOMV WITH KEY KSCHL = 'ZMEX'.
IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
FLAG_ZMEX = 'X'.
ZMEX_KWERT = XKOMV-KWERT.
ENDIF.
READ TABLE XKOMV WITH KEY KSCHL = 'JEXP'.
IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
IF FLAG_ZMAN = 'X' AND FLAG_ZMEX = ' ' .
IF ZMAN_KBETR > 0.
XKWERT = ZMAN_KWERT. "CHANGE ON 3.7.2008
XKOMV-KBETR = ZMAN_KBETR.
MODIFY XKOMV INDEX SY-TABIX.
ENDIF.
ELSEIF FLAG_ZMAN = ' ' AND FLAG_ZMEX = 'X' .
XKWERT = ZMEX_KWERT.
ELSEIF FLAG_ZMAN = 'X' AND FLAG_ZMEX = 'X' .
XKWERT = XKOMV-KWERT.
MESSAGE 'Maintain either ZMEX or ZMAN' type 'S'.
ENDIF.
ENDIF.
*break abap.
*ROUNDING
READ TABLE XKOMV WITH KEY KSCHL = 'JEXP'.
if sy-subrc = 0.
if komk-vkorg = 2000 and ( komk-vtweg = '10' or komk-vtweg = '30' ).
exit.
else.
DATA : BEFORE_ROUND TYPE PC207-BETRG,
AFTER_ROUND TYPE PC207-BETRG.
BEFORE_ROUND = XKWERT .
CALL FUNCTION 'HR_IN_ROUND_AMT'
EXPORTING
AMOUNT = BEFORE_ROUND
RNDOFF = 100
RNDLMT = 'N'
IMPORTING
RETAMT = AFTER_ROUND
DLTAMT =
XKWERT = AFTER_ROUND.
endif.
*endif.
*} INSERT
ENDFORM.
Here we have created a routine 901 - So when i put any value in say ZMAN / ZMEX , the same vaule gets copied in the JEXP my baisc excise condition type . So when i post only JEXP is posted.
At any point of time - only one condition type will be used - so in this we have written the same code.
make sure you create them as Manual Statistical item condition , where the user has to press F4 and pick any one when he want to use this manual concept.
You can ask you ABAPer to create this routine and write and map the above logic.
The value of manual excise conition should get copy to you main excise condition. Also followed up with rounding of the values
This will work definately.
Thanks................Rishi -
Excise Base value and BED is wrong in MIGO while Depot
we are creating the PO for Depot, Tax code is NO ED setoff means
The BED is going to Inventory.
material is FERT material and Plant is DEPOT. we are using the conditions here are PB00some Z conditions and the BED is calculted on the PB00Z conitions ,
The BED and ECS and SEcess is shown in PO taxes tab correctly.
But when i go for MIGO "Create RG23D entry" the System will shown me the Double the BED and excise Base value is only taking the PB00 value, it is not taking the PB00+Z conditions why?
ECS and SEcess both are correct.
Here in PO the BED is calculted on PB00+Zconditions*....
In MIGO ....in Excise Item the BED % is showing me wrong values....It is not shwoing us the 14% correctly every time it is shown us different values
We are maintained the J1ID correctly for these........
After MIGO posting:
But the BED and remaing values are correctly shown in J1IDEPOTSTCOK1 tcode.
But when i saw the J_I1ECDHDR table the BED is Double and ECS and SECess both are correct
Why the BED is double and Excise base value wrong in MIGO...
Then I go for J1IG Here system is showing me Only BED i,e also wrong and it is not shwoing me ECS and SECess blank why?
Please kindly do the needful
Regards
sapman manPlease check ur setting of maintainexsice defaults.
BED condition type should be properly maintained.
regards,
Sujit -
Excise Base value and BED is wrong in MIGO and J1IG
Hi,
we are creating the PO for Depot, Tax code is NO ED setoff means
The BED is going to Inventory.
material is FERT material and Plant is DEPOT. we are using the conditions here are PB00some Z conditions and the BED is calculted on the PB00Z conitions ,
The BED and ECS and SEcess is shown in PO taxes tab correctly.
But when i go for MIGO "Create RG23D entry" the System will shown me the Double the BED and excise Base value is only taking the PB00 value, it is not taking the PB00+Z conditions why?
ECS and SEcess both are correct.
Here in PO the BED is calculted on PB00+Zconditions*....
In MIGO ....in Excise Item the BED % is showing me wrong values....It is not shwoing us the 14% correctly every time it is shown us different values
We are maintained the J1ID correctly for these........
After MIGO posting:
But the BED and remaing values are correctly shown in J1IDEPOTSTCOK1 tcode.
But when i saw the J_I1ECDHDR table the BED is Double and ECS and SECess both are correct
Why the BED is double and Excise base value wrong in MIGO...
Then I go for J1IG Here system is showing me Only BED i,e also wrong and it is not shwoing me ECS and SECess blank why?
Please kindly do the needful
Regards
sapman manDear,
Use Z condition before PB00. The same should be statastical as PB00.
Check the excise default settings as well as,
Check the classify condition types
regards,
sujit -
Conditions to "Classify Condition Types" (SPRO)
Hi Friends ....
Is it required to maintain VAT / CST conditions JVRN / JVCS in "Classify Condition Types (SPRO -> Logictics general-> Basic data->Determination of excise Duty->Condition Based Excise Duty).
Pls also let me know what is use for maintaining conditions in this settings ?
Thx in advance
Regards
ShreyHi,
U have to maintain the JVRD,JVCS condition in the classify condition type.
The use of this come in to picture when we run MIRO programme.
At that time system checks the what classification is given to the specific condition type .say for e.g BED we are maintaining RG23 BED setoff % for this .so that system understands that BED is to be taken for setoff not for inventory and again to RG23 register.
regards,
sujit -
Hi friends,
The Excise invoice shows zero values(BED,CESS ...)
What are the setoff conditions to be maintained from SD end?
Thanks
IvyHi,
Please check the configuration for excise conditions BED,ECS,SHCESS, in Maintain Excise Defaults.
Path:IMG>Logistics - General->Tax on Goods Movements>India>Basic Settings>Determination of Excise Duty>Maintain Excise Defaults
Maintain the respective condition types in
AR BED feild with excise condition type Ex: JEXT
ECS AR feild with ecess condition type Ex: JECP
ARAT1 CONDITION feild with SHcess condition type Ex: JA1X
Subsequently maintain the following also.
Path:IMG>Logistics - General->Tax on Goods Movements>India>Basic Settings>Determination of Excise Duty>Condition-Based Excise Determination-->Classify Condition Types.
maintain pricing procedure and respective condition types with respective condition names
Ex:
JINFAC JEXT AR BED TOTAL
JINFAC JECP AR ECS TOTAL
JINFAC JA1X AR AT1 TOTAL.
Hope This should work and resolve your problem.
Bye,
Subramanyam.B -
How to find the start condition of a ABAP program?
Hello Gurus!,
Could any one please explain how to find the start condition of a ABAP program?
like its a event based or time based?and also how to find that event and time..
Thanks in Advance...
DinakarHi Dinkar,
Go to Job Schedule, put Job Step parameter as your program and see scheduled Job.
In Schedule Job double click to see start condition. and steps to see details and variant.
Hope it helps.
Thanks
CK -
Pricing Condition not picking from Info record
Dear Sapians
We have made all the Changes for Higher Education Cess. Now while creating PO some conditions are not picking from info record(only for some materials). In Dev. server Everything working fine.
What could be the problem?
Warm Regards
Sukumaran.EHi Sukumaran,
You need to go to PO -> item conditions -> press analysis button.
double click on the pricing condition on left hand side screen. You will get proper analysis. Like "PBXX 111 Condition ignored (requirement 005 not fulfilled)"
These descriptions will give clear hint on the reason of price not being picked up.
- Sanjeev -
Condition maintained at Hierarchy not appearing in Sales document
Hi
We have a Condition for Discount, maintained for key combination "Sales area/Customer/ Product hierarchy".
There are two condition records maintained for the above key combination.
1 - Sales area/Customer/ Product hierarchy/group/ subgroup
2 - Sales area/Customer/ Product hierarchy/ group
In Access sequance of this condition, subgroup has priority 1 and group has priority 2.
In condition record for the first combination (Sales area/Customer/ Product hierarchy/group/subgroup)has 'deletion indicator' checked.
Condtion record found by the system in sales document pricing is the first combination which has 'deletion indicator' and condition record for second combination which is also maintained is IGNORED So in the pricing the condtion is not appearing.
Please let us know if this is standard SAP functionality or a defect.
Thanks.Amritpal Singh ,
You have a Condition for Discount, key combination "Sales area/Customer/ Product hierarchy".
According to what i perceive
1 - Sales area/Customer/ Product hierarchy/group/ subgroup - Delete indicator is activated which means the value for this ondition record will not be displayed.
2 - Sales area/Customer/ Product hierarchy/ group is ignored
If it is so, check by double clicking item details screeen --> Conditions tab --> and Click Analysis Tab then choose the condition type then in right side of the screen you can see the details.
Inform us what details it is posting, if value is showing or not showing, also check whether you have mainatined condition type as Manual.. Check it....
Revert
Regards
Sathya -
Dear all,
Notice either from Contract or Info record, when select "Condition" button there is a popup window that display a 2 condition types. I need to double click one of the condition type can further define the pricing.
My question is, from SPRO may i know how can i determine the 2 condition types should appear in popup window but not others? Because from the same pricing schema, there are 20 condition types in total but why only these 2 condition types make available for selection but not others. Setting must be somewhere to control it.
Could you please advice?Hi
I think the pop up is "Overview of Condition Types".
Please check in the pricing schema via M/08 for example for RM0000(which will be standard one),
in the control data have you assigned 2 condition type for "gross price"? e.g. PB00 and P000? If yes, system will pop up the window for you to choose the certain condition.
To check if the condition type is a "gross price" to be proposed in the screen, below
tables are being checked:
T683S
T685
T685A
T682I
You may also debug in the program below, and check the internal table I_T685[]
SAPLMEKO / LMEKOF0H
FORM / KONDITIONSART_SUCHEN
If I_T685[] has entries count > 1, the pop up will be displayed.
Hope the info above helps.
Thanks and regards,
Polly
Edited by: Polly Gan on Apr 11, 2010 3:17 AM -
Cenvatable BED & ECS not getting picked up in transaction ;J1IEX
Hi,
While capturing excise invoice for GR the Cenvatable BED and ECS percentage and value is not picked up automatically. Only the non-deductible CST value is shown.The Excise base amount is also appearing.
There are two errors:
1. Quantity could not be converted from NOS to "Message no. V1297".
2. PLA-AT2 amount 24.02.2007 is greater than available amount. "Message no. 8I659"
All relevant CIN masters are maintained.The base UOM in Material master is given in NOS (numbers).
Can anybody help me urgently?
Regards
Saikat HalderBiswait,
Thanks for your reply.
I have maintained the Excise defaults in CIN customisation for our condition based tax procedure TSILTX. Under "A/P BED Cond." I have maintained JMOP condition type (Cenvatable) and under "ECS AP" I have maintained JECP condition type (Cenvatable).
The Education Cess (JECP) value is coming while I am doing Part-I during GR transaction (MIGO), but the BED value is still not appearing.
The help option on the field "A/P BED Cond." in SAP ECC6.0 says "Condition Type defined in Tax Procedure TAXINJ for Basix Excise Duty on Accounts Payable." . Shall this JMOP condition type work for here ?
Regards
Saikat Halder
Maybe you are looking for
-
How can I transfer music and movies from my iPod to my PC?
I recently lost all of my content on iTunes and have been looking for a way to transfer my content from my iPod over to my PC. I have no idea how I can do it, and my iPod is going screwy, so I need to transfer my content before my iPod finally breaks
-
Error while deployoing the bPEL Process
Hi , I'm getting the below error when i'm trying to deploy a BPEL Process. It got deployed and in the OPMN log i see the below error: May 20, 2008 12:34:21 PM org.apache.commons.httpclient.HttpMethodDirector executeWithRetry INFO: Recoverable excepti
-
I have purchased a couple of tv series and downloaded to my iPad, now I want to put a couple of new series on remove these to save space on my iPad how do I do this?
-
[fixed (kinda-)] PCManFM lost file type associations after last update
Hi there, I just updated my system and it happened something strange: PCManFM lost all the file associations. Result is, for whatever file i click, it asks me how to open the file. If i right click a file, selecting "Open with … → Open with another p
-
Macro for automatically sending E-mail from a folder
I have a folder containing purchase orders (in pdf format) for many companies (say 500 companies), which I should send them manually to all the companies twice a month. (by insert the Purchase order and selecting the E-mail address and send separatel