BED is Double in No ED setoff Conditions

Hello,
Such scenarioes of manual excise is also applicable for receipts in
depot. e.g. when duty is paid w.r.t MRP, RG23D needs to be updated with
MRP less abatement for excise base value (instead of PO base value) and
BED @ applicable rate on MRP less abatement. In PO, the ED payable
w.r.t. MRP less abatement is shown as Manual Excise. How do we address
this issue?
For This We are Creating the ZMRP condition type for materials.. in this condition type we are maintaining the MRP value of material.
And Created the ZABT condition type for abatement (38%) and maintained the records.
And mainatained the ZED% for calculation of ED which calculated on ZMRP-Abartment charge(Suppose MRP value is 100 INR & the 38% Abttement means 100-38 on 62 INR ED is calulated.for this
ZED% maintained for material and plant specific.. and Assigned the Subtotal 5 for this one.in Pricing
While in Setoff Tax code ED is calculted correct in Mfg plant as well as Depot.
But Depot is having the No ED setoff the ED is Becoming Double... The ZED% value is Adding the JMO2 value and Becoming double
Regards
Mahesh Naik

Dear Mahesh,
                         I am not clear in your problem but there is a work around. U should set the %of duties to match the total price in  eg. now your problem is that  ZED% is getting double. for this particular material temporarily set % of ZED in JM02 .  Now you  check by creating a PO and doing the GR and MIRO for the material received.
After the transaction is over u reset it back to the actual value.  Check this senario and check that at this moment PO values should not be affected for other materials and try to avoid doing PO of other material till u finish this PO.
           If the above is not working out u have to manipulate basic price and the conditions accordingly and create the PO so as to get the values to be adjusted for setoff.
           We have faced this problem with BED as the basic price is given discount but the excise duty is charged according to the actual value.

Similar Messages

  • Setoff conditions in po

    hi everybody
    why we take setoff of excise duties at time of creation of purchase order like jmx1,jex1,how it effect the process
    points will be rewarded
    k.chhikara

    Hi
    System first calculate BED amount based on your condition record for JMOP.JMX1 will be calculates settoff % against JMOP .
    JMOP value depends on your material and decided by the goverment means for some product it is 16% and for some it is 32% like that.
    But if suppose you are small scale industry and you are eligible for payment of 80 % of BED.
    Then you have to maintain 80% for JMX1 which will in contrast calculate 80 % of your 16% BED value.
    Means suppose you have 100rs value on which 16% means 16rs your BED then on this 16 rs system calculates 80% value like12.8 rs.means your net value will be your grossJMX1 ed valueST.10012.8ST.
    Hope you will get it.
    Regards
    rb

  • Double Booking against same freight condition In import PO.

    Dear All,
    I have a issue for import PO.Two freight forwarder have wrongly raised bills against the same consignment and the FI user book the both bill in MIRO.System allows the same and didn't give any error or warning message.My question is how i control the double booking of same amount ?
      In SPRO-MM-LIV - Incoming  InvoiceSet check for Duplicate invoice Indicator is set only for "Check Reference" and not for check company code and Invoice date. And our client user didn't maintain vendor in PO condition.But in MIRO they selects the condition and in Details tab>Invoicing .Party-- maintains the vendor and posts the MIRO.
    Please Guide me ...
    Regards
    Sachin

    Hello Jeyakanthan,
    I have set company code and invoice date.It helps a lot. Now system gives me message "Check if invoice already entered under accounting doc. no. 5100000069 2011 and  Message no. M8108".But when i open this 510000069 2011 in MIR5 i didn't find any similarity in this and the one which i am posting.Is there any other way out? But i notice if i m posting the duplicate entry (i.e. 2nd MIRO) against the same qty,in MIRO under "Settled qty" i can see the qty which was posted earlier MIRO.Can we use this for reference and can arranged the settled qty column near qty column in MIRO. In PO/MIGO there is facility to set the sequence of column but not in MIRO..
    Thanking you in advance.as usual your reply always helps a lot.
    Regards
    Sachin Thakur

  • Manual excise for non setoff conditions

    Dear sir,
    i am purchasing certain matl from other unit of our company. Net price is actual stock trf price whereas assesable value for ED is greater than that. M using non set off conditions (jmip). Since net price & price for ED calculation is diferent m trying to use manual excise but system is calculating ED based on jmip condition record value. What should i do to capture actual ED. pl help.

    Hi,
    To actual excise  value
    use tcode - J1IW
    there you fill the  required  details then click on detail then you enetr the base value and  the value you want to capture.
    then select the line and save
    thereafter
    goto  J1IEX and post the excise
    Regards,
    Vijay

  • BED is Getting Double in MIGO while creating of RG23D entry

    Hello,
    While we have procuring some material to DEPOT directly from vendor. As per government rule we are maintaining the ZMRP and ZABT condition types in Pricing procedure
    In Pricing procedure
    10 ZMRP Step from 0 to 0
    20 ZABT Step from 10 to 0
    30 Sub total from   10 to 20
    ZED% is calculted from this step "Amount for ED Calculation"
    means the BED is calculted on MRP-38%Abartment charge.
    means BED=ZMRP-ZABT%*14%
    We have assigned Subtotal 5 against the ZED% condition in our pricing
    procedure.We understand that subtotal 5 should not be used for non
    deductible BED as it is used only for Deductible BED.But we are
    procuring the same material in manufacturing plant as well therefore we
    are using Subtotal 5 in the pricing procedure.
    If we use ED setoff tax code then BED is taking correct value from JMO1
    condition
    In DEPOT the ZED% 14% from Pricing procedure and JMO2 from Tax procedure it is adding in MIGO Excise tab  while creating the RG23D  entry .why it is behaving like this
    Please let us know Why it is behaving erraticaly in DEPOT?
    Regards
    Mahesh Naik

    Please check ur setting of maintainexsice defaults.
    BED condition type should be properly maintained.
    regards,
    Sujit

  • Two Different conditions for BED in excise invoice

    Dear Team,
       I am using condition type JEXP condition type for automatic condition and for excise invoice, but for some specific cases my client wants to use one more condition for BED as manual condition where he want to enter BED amount as manual and ECS and HECS should calculate automatically on manual BED. He wants that other procedure with JEXP should be continue parallaly. But during the creation of excise invoice only one value is being passed to excise invoice for BED as I can maintain only one condition for "maintain excise defaults." In manual scenerio my ECS and HECS values are reflecting in excise invoice but BED is zero because at the place of BED JEXP is maintained in excise defaults. Kindly suggest how can I use both the scenerios to create excise invoice.
    Regards,
    Neeraj

    Hi
    I  have faced this problem in each of my projects. So sharing my idea of work around.
    Create a Condtion type - ZMAN (Manual excise fixed amount ) and ZMEX for manual excise in percentage and adjust his just above you Excise condtion type .
    100.           ZMAN Statistical  (Manual excise in Fixed Amount)                          Created Routine - 901
    105            ZMEX   Statistical (Manual excise in percentage )                             Created Routine  901
    110            JEXP    (BED)
    *If ZMAN is maintained then the KBETR (Amount)  is copied to JEXP
    *}   INSERT
    FORM FRM_KONDI_WERT_901.
    *{   INSERT         MCDK900627                                        1
    *FORM FRM_KONDI_WERT_901.
    DATA : ZMAN_KBETR TYPE KOMV-KBETR,
           ZMAN_KWERT TYPE KOMV-KWERT,
           ZMEX_KWERT TYPE KOMV-KWERT.
    DATA : FLAG_ZMAN(1),
           FLAG_ZMEX(1).
    READ TABLE XKOMV WITH KEY KSCHL = 'ZMAN'.
         IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
            FLAG_ZMAN = 'X'.
            ZMAN_KBETR  =   XKOMV-KBETR.
            ZMAN_KWERT  =   XKOMV-KWERT.        " CHANGE ON 3.7.2008
          ENDIF.
    READ TABLE XKOMV WITH KEY KSCHL = 'ZMEX'.
         IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
            FLAG_ZMEX = 'X'.
            ZMEX_KWERT  =   XKOMV-KWERT.
          ENDIF.
    READ TABLE XKOMV WITH KEY KSCHL = 'JEXP'.
    IF SY-SUBRC =  0.
       IF FLAG_ZMAN = 'X' AND FLAG_ZMEX = ' ' .
             IF ZMAN_KBETR > 0.
               XKWERT = ZMAN_KWERT.                "CHANGE ON 3.7.2008
               XKOMV-KBETR = ZMAN_KBETR.
               MODIFY XKOMV INDEX SY-TABIX.
              ENDIF.
        ELSEIF FLAG_ZMAN = ' ' AND FLAG_ZMEX = 'X' .
               XKWERT = ZMEX_KWERT.
        ELSEIF FLAG_ZMAN = 'X' AND FLAG_ZMEX = 'X' .
                XKWERT =  XKOMV-KWERT.
               MESSAGE  'Maintain either ZMEX or ZMAN' type 'S'.
         ENDIF.
    ENDIF.
    *break abap.
    *ROUNDING
    READ TABLE XKOMV WITH KEY KSCHL = 'JEXP'.
    if sy-subrc = 0.
    if komk-vkorg = 2000 and ( komk-vtweg = '10' or komk-vtweg = '30' ).
       exit.
    else.
           DATA : BEFORE_ROUND TYPE PC207-BETRG,
                  AFTER_ROUND TYPE PC207-BETRG.
            BEFORE_ROUND = XKWERT  .
    CALL FUNCTION 'HR_IN_ROUND_AMT'
      EXPORTING
        AMOUNT        = BEFORE_ROUND
        RNDOFF        = 100
       RNDLMT        = 'N'
    IMPORTING
       RETAMT        = AFTER_ROUND
      DLTAMT        =
    XKWERT = AFTER_ROUND.
    endif.
    *endif.
    *}   INSERT
    ENDFORM.
    Here we have created a routine 901 - So when i put any value in say ZMAN / ZMEX , the same vaule gets copied in the JEXP my baisc excise condition type . So when i post only JEXP is posted.
    At any point of time - only one condition type will be used - so in this we have written the same code.
    make sure you create them as Manual Statistical item condition , where the user has to press F4 and pick any one when he want to use this manual concept.
    You can ask you ABAPer to create this routine and write and map the above logic.
    The value of manual excise conition should get copy to you main excise condition. Also followed up with rounding of the values
    This will work definately.
    Thanks................Rishi

  • Excise Base value and BED is wrong in MIGO  while Depot

    we are creating the PO for Depot, Tax code is NO ED setoff means
    The BED is going to Inventory.
    material is FERT material and Plant is DEPOT. we are using the conditions here are PB00some Z conditions and the BED is calculted on the PB00Z conitions ,
    The BED and ECS and SEcess is shown in PO taxes tab correctly.
    But when i go for MIGO "Create RG23D entry" the System will shown me the Double the BED and excise Base value is only taking the PB00 value, it is not taking the PB00+Z conditions why?
    ECS and SEcess both are correct.
    Here in PO the BED is calculted on PB00+Zconditions*....
    In MIGO ....in Excise Item the BED % is showing me wrong values....It is not shwoing us the 14% correctly every time it is shown us different values
    We are maintained the J1ID correctly for these........
    After MIGO posting:
    But the BED and remaing values are correctly shown in J1IDEPOTSTCOK1 tcode.
    But when i saw the J_I1ECDHDR table the BED is Double and ECS and SECess both are correct
    Why the BED is double and Excise base value wrong in MIGO...
    Then I go for J1IG Here system is showing me Only BED i,e also wrong and it is not shwoing me ECS and SECess blank why?
    Please kindly do the needful
    Regards
    sapman man

    Please check ur setting of maintainexsice defaults.
    BED condition type should be properly maintained.
    regards,
    Sujit

  • Excise Base value and BED is wrong in MIGO and J1IG

    Hi,
    we are creating the PO for Depot, Tax code is NO ED setoff means
    The BED  is going to Inventory.
    material is FERT material and Plant is DEPOT. we are using the conditions here are PB00some Z conditions and the BED is calculted on the PB00Z conitions ,
    The BED and ECS and SEcess is shown in PO taxes tab correctly.
    But when i go for MIGO "Create RG23D entry" the System will shown me the Double the BED and excise Base value is only taking the PB00 value, it is not taking the PB00+Z conditions why?
    ECS and SEcess both are correct.
    Here in PO the BED is calculted on PB00+Zconditions*....
    In MIGO ....in Excise Item the BED % is showing me wrong values....It is not shwoing us the 14% correctly  every time it is shown us different values
    We are maintained the J1ID correctly for these........
    After MIGO posting:
    But the BED and remaing values are correctly shown in J1IDEPOTSTCOK1 tcode.
    But when i saw the J_I1ECDHDR table the BED is Double and ECS and SECess both are correct
    Why the BED is double  and Excise base value wrong in MIGO...
    Then I go for J1IG  Here system is showing me Only BED i,e also wrong and it is not shwoing me ECS and SECess blank  why?
    Please kindly do the needful
    Regards
    sapman man

    Dear,
    Use Z condition before PB00. The same should be statastical as PB00.
    Check the excise default settings as well as,
    Check the classify condition types
    regards,
    sujit

  • Conditions to "Classify Condition Types" (SPRO)

    Hi Friends ....
    Is it required to maintain VAT / CST conditions JVRN / JVCS in "Classify Condition Types (SPRO -> Logictics general-> Basic data->Determination of excise Duty->Condition Based Excise Duty).
    Pls also let me know what is use for maintaining conditions in this settings ?
    Thx in advance
    Regards
    Shrey

    Hi,
    U have to maintain the JVRD,JVCS condition in the classify condition type.
    The use of this come in to picture when we run MIRO programme.
    At that time system checks the what classification is given to the specific condition type .say for e.g BED we are maintaining RG23 BED setoff % for this .so that system understands that BED is to be taken for setoff not for inventory and again to RG23 register.
    regards,
    sujit

  • Set off conditions in SD

    Hi friends,
    The Excise invoice shows zero values(BED,CESS ...)
    What are the setoff conditions to be maintained from SD end?
    Thanks
    Ivy

    Hi,
    Please check the configuration for excise conditions BED,ECS,SHCESS, in Maintain Excise Defaults.
    Path:IMG>Logistics - General->Tax on Goods Movements>India>Basic Settings>Determination of Excise Duty>Maintain Excise Defaults
    Maintain the respective condition types in
    AR BED feild with excise condition type Ex: JEXT
    ECS AR  feild with ecess condition type Ex: JECP
    ARAT1 CONDITION feild with SHcess condition type Ex: JA1X
    Subsequently maintain the following also.
    Path:IMG>Logistics - General->Tax on Goods Movements>India>Basic Settings>Determination of Excise Duty>Condition-Based Excise Determination-->Classify Condition Types.
    maintain pricing procedure and respective condition types with respective condition names
    Ex:
    JINFAC   JEXT   AR BED TOTAL
    JINFAC   JECP   AR ECS TOTAL
    JINFAC   JA1X   AR AT1  TOTAL.
    Hope This should work and resolve your problem.
    Bye,
    Subramanyam.B

  • How to find the start condition of a ABAP program?

    Hello Gurus!,
    Could any one please explain how to find the start condition of a ABAP program?
    like its a event based or time based?and also how to find that event and time..
    Thanks in Advance...
    Dinakar

    Hi Dinkar,
    Go to Job Schedule, put Job Step parameter as your program and see scheduled Job.
    In Schedule Job double click to see start condition. and steps to see details and variant.
    Hope it helps.
    Thanks
    CK

  • Pricing Condition not picking from Info record

    Dear Sapians
    We have made all the Changes for Higher Education Cess. Now while creating PO some conditions are not picking from info record(only for some materials). In Dev. server Everything working fine.
    What could be the problem?
    Warm Regards
    Sukumaran.E

    Hi Sukumaran,
    You need to go to PO -> item conditions -> press analysis button.
    double click on the pricing condition on left hand side screen. You will get proper analysis. Like "PBXX     111 Condition ignored (requirement 005 not fulfilled)"
    These descriptions will give clear hint on the reason of price not being picked up.
    - Sanjeev

  • Condition maintained at Hierarchy not appearing in Sales document

    Hi
    We have a Condition for Discount, maintained for key combination "Sales area/Customer/ Product hierarchy".
    There are two condition records maintained for the above key combination.
    1 - Sales area/Customer/ Product hierarchy/group/ subgroup
    2 - Sales area/Customer/ Product hierarchy/ group
    In Access sequance of this condition, subgroup has priority 1 and group has priority 2.
    In condition record for the first combination (Sales area/Customer/ Product hierarchy/group/subgroup)has 'deletion indicator' checked.
    Condtion record found by the system in sales document pricing is the first combination which has 'deletion indicator' and condition record for second combination which is also maintained is IGNORED  So in the pricing the condtion is not appearing.
    Please let us know if this is standard SAP functionality or a defect.
    Thanks.

    Amritpal Singh  ,
    You  have a Condition for Discount, key combination "Sales area/Customer/ Product hierarchy".
    According to what i perceive
    1 - Sales area/Customer/ Product hierarchy/group/ subgroup - Delete indicator is activated which means the value for this ondition record will not be displayed.
    2 - Sales area/Customer/ Product hierarchy/ group is ignored
    If it is so, check by double clicking item details screeen --> Conditions tab --> and Click Analysis Tab then choose the condition type then in right side of the screen you can see the details.
    Inform us what details it is posting, if value is showing or not showing, also check whether you have mainatined condition type as Manual.. Check it....
    Revert
    Regards
    Sathya

  • Pricing Condition

    Dear all,
    Notice either from Contract or Info record, when select "Condition" button there is a popup window that display a 2 condition types. I need to double click one of the condition type can further define the pricing.
    My question is, from SPRO may i know how can i determine the 2 condition types should appear in popup window but not others? Because from the same pricing schema, there are 20 condition types in total but why only these 2 condition types make available for selection but not others. Setting must be somewhere to control it.
    Could you please advice?

    Hi
    I think the pop up is "Overview of Condition Types".
    Please check in the pricing schema via M/08 for example for RM0000(which will be standard one),
    in the control data have you assigned 2 condition type for "gross price"? e.g. PB00 and P000? If yes, system will pop up the window for you to choose the certain condition.
    To check if the condition type is a "gross price" to be proposed in the screen, below
    tables are  being checked:
    T683S
    T685
    T685A
    T682I
    You may also debug in the program below, and check the internal table I_T685[]
    SAPLMEKO                       / LMEKOF0H
    FORM                                / KONDITIONSART_SUCHEN
    If  I_T685[] has entries count > 1, the pop up will be displayed.
    Hope the info above helps.
    Thanks and regards,
    Polly
    Edited by: Polly Gan on Apr 11, 2010 3:17 AM

  • Cenvatable BED & ECS not getting picked up in transaction ;J1IEX

    Hi,
    While capturing excise invoice for GR the Cenvatable BED and ECS percentage and value is not picked up automatically. Only the non-deductible CST value is shown.The Excise base amount is also appearing.
    There are two errors:
    1. Quantity could not be converted from NOS to "Message no. V1297".
    2. PLA-AT2 amount 24.02.2007 is greater than available amount. "Message no. 8I659"
    All relevant CIN masters are maintained.The base UOM in Material master is given in NOS (numbers).
    Can anybody help me urgently?
    Regards
    Saikat Halder

    Biswait,
    Thanks for your reply.
    I have maintained the Excise defaults in CIN customisation for our condition based tax procedure TSILTX.  Under "A/P  BED Cond." I have maintained JMOP condition type (Cenvatable) and under "ECS AP"  I have maintained JECP condition type (Cenvatable).
    The Education Cess (JECP) value is coming while I am doing Part-I during GR transaction (MIGO), but the BED value is still not appearing.
    The help option on the field "A/P  BED Cond." in SAP  ECC6.0 says "Condition Type defined in Tax Procedure TAXINJ for Basix Excise Duty on Accounts Payable." . Shall this JMOP condition type work for here ?
    Regards
    Saikat Halder

Maybe you are looking for