Benefit plan - rule issue

Hello experts,
We have an issue that I need your help with.  I am new to benefits so any help would be most appreciated.
When an employee tries to enroll their spouse in the Spouse Life benefit plan, he/she cannot enroll them unless they themselves are in the Employee Life plan.  This is the way our plan is set up.
We have noticed that on ESS the first time the employee goes into Open Enrollment do this, it will correctly prevent the spouse from being enrolled without the employee having it as well.  But if the employee logs off of ESS and then tries again, it will allow the spouse to be enrolled without the employee also being enrolled.  It seems as if the rule doesnu2019t u2018applyu2019 all the time.
What are we missing?  Is this a plan set up issue or is this an ESS issue?
Thanks,
Suparna

Hello,
This question has been answered.  It apears that the rule worked one way but not the other so a rule had to be set up on the employee's plan as well.
In other words, we allow employees to enroll their spouse in suuplemental life for the amount of 1/2 the employee's election.  In our case the system was allowing the spouse to be enrolled in equal to the amount or even without the employee being enrolled! 
It turns out that the spouse plan had a rule about the 1/2 but the employee plan did not therefore there was no cross check happening in that direction.
Thanks,
Suparna

Similar Messages

  • ESS Benefit Plan Decimals Issue

    Hello ,
    We are on EP7.0 ECC6.0 and have an Open Enrollment Application which lets employees enroll for various Benefit Plans ....and when they try to Edit the Plan the cost shows up as 9.51 if the value is 9.51 in R/3.The Cost shows up as 9.5 even if the value in R/3 is 9.50....so somewhere the trailing zero is getting discarded ...Please help.
    Any help would be highly appreciated.
    Message was edited by:
            Shikhil Arora

    Any ideas anybody....

  • Automatic Benefit Plans based on Date Types in IT0041

    Hi
    I am having an issue with a re-hired employee. We have two date types in IT0041. Current Hire date and Service Award Date. If somebody is hired for 1st time, both the date types are same( e.g 12/12/2008). and this case the automatic benefit plans follow the config rules properly and some start from the hire date and some from the 1st of following month as per the config ruel.
    But If we are re-hiring an employee, in this case Current Hire date( 12/12/2008) would be different from Service award date ( because of his previous experience with this employer). In this case all the automatic plans are starting from the date when the re-hire action is performed, not even the re-hire date and do not follow the config rule at all.
    We have never made any dependency of benefit plan on IT0041 anywhere in config, but why this is happening? Any suggestion would be appreciated,
    Thanks
    Wills

    Nope. we never configured the dynamic eligibility part. So that makes it more strange. Because if all the date are same it works fine , but if the dates are different, it gives wrong result

  • Getting Dependents (IT 0021) of a Benefit Plan

    Hi All,
    I'm attempting to write a report that will display the name and type of a dependent of a particular EE's benefit plan.  I know the link is between DTY01/DID01 - DTY20/DID20 in the benefits table (EX. IT 0167) and The Subtype and OBJPS of IT 0021 (Family).  However, I can't figure out quite how to display the family information for the benefit plan.  I've done a flat data load in two ODS's .. one for IT0021 and one for IT0167.  I would think that an InfoSet would help with this solution, however, any advice would be helpful.  The issue is that an EE can have multiple dependents.  This is why there are 20 DTY and DID fields.
    I'm unable to use the standard BI cube for benefits.  This is why I've build custom data targets.
    Thanks in advance,
    Meezy

    Hi Meezy,
    This solution is not efficient as you have already thought. What I would suggest for the time being is that link the 2 ods only based on the employees. That way, you will have all the records visible for reporting. Eg: if you have 3 records in 167 and 2 records in 21 for an employee, you can see all the 5 records with all the 20 fields in each record. In the query, you can restrict the records by the required subtype. Now, you can compare objps with each of the 20 fields in the query using calculated kfs. Again, it is not a performance optimized solution.
    Thanks and Regards
    Subray Hegde

  • Benefit plan maximum coverage amount problem

    Hello.
    I guess I have a very simple problem, but I doesnu2019t get it running.
    I have an Insurance benefit plan.
    It only have one coverage rule with the following data:
    Salary Factor: 0.6000
    Rounding Rule: rounded up
    Rounding div:  1000.00
    Maximum amount: 90,000.00
    So if someone have a Benefit Salary of 225,000.00, it shows a basic Coverage amount of 135,000.00 in Infotype 0168.
    But I want a maximum Coverage amount of 90,000.00.
    Why it ignored the maximum limit?
    Any help would be very nice.
    Regards.

    Please close your thread if you solved your problem.

  • SAP Closed Benefit Plans

    Hi All,
    We have certain Benefit Plans which are closed , no more new Enrollment in this plan.But existing employees can change their benefit plan option.
    This plan has Plan type as that of many active plans. When i try to see this plan in Enrollment workbench i am not seeing this plan.
    Whether its because of Closed status and if any workaround for this issue??
    Thanks & Regards

    Hi Scott,
    Thanks for the suggestions scott.Its very much helpful.
    Customer is not having ESS as of now.
    Also Locked concept here we are using with Closed Name.
    How if locked employees will be able to change the options...because i am not seeing that option in workbench???
    Thanks & Regards

  • Benefit Plan Setup

    Hello Experts..
    We are setting up the core tables for Benefit and we approached client and received below requirements on all the benefit plans that they are going to provide. Looking at below list, our client seems really generous:
    1. Health -
    a) Medical/Visoin
    b) Dental
    c) Domestic partner medical/vision
    2. Life -
    a) Sup life 1x-5x
    b) Life AD/D
    c) Dependent life (Children)
    d) Spousal Life
    3. Disability -
    a) LTD
    4. Leave -
    a) Sick
    b) Vacation
    c) Personal
    d) Company Car
    5. Retirement -
    a) Retirement
    6. Pension
    a). Pension
    7. Vacation buy/sell
    a) Buy
    b) Sell
    Here is what we have done so far :-
    For 1a and 1c we have added customer plan types with code 1Z and 1Y respectively since the existing ones didn't look relevant. This plan means, vision coverage will come under medical coverage. but dental will be standalone.
    For 2a, we have added 5 plans as per the requirement 1x, 2x, 3x, 4x ,5x
    2c and 2d will be awarded only when employee takes supplemental life.
    for 5a, created a new plan type with more relevant meaning with code 5Y.
    Finally, Our questions are:
    1 - Have we set up these plans correctly? if you think there should be changes in this please share you thoughts
    2 - Can we combine 2c and 2d instead of keeping them separate because if employee takes any supp life then dependents can be covered, and dependents means if employee is married then spouse + 2 children but if single then both parents.
    3 - Why do we have the option "Self-Service Plan Description" only for 1x, 3x, 5x and 7x. does it means employee will have opportunity to elect in these plans only?
    What about supp life where there are 5 type of plans and if employee doesn't have above option then how will he/she decide which plan can he/she elect?
    4 - Why is it required to give vendor name for Leave and vacation buy/sell plan types? is it applicable for these two plan types? what does vendor have to do with Leaves?
    We are in the starting phase of setting up benefits so we really need your help continuously so please respond back with your valuable thoughts

    Yes, you are right create for each grouping create a separate age groupings. And define "Employee contribution variant"  check mark age  then assign the age groupings you create to Employee contribution rule.. Finally assign these variant to the savings plan..
    I hope this helps...let me know if you have any further question. Just try it out you will get it...

  • HSA Benefit Plan: Employee Contr and Employer Contr deductions not happenin

    Hi Experts,
    For a couple of our empls, the Employee Contr and the Employer Contr wagetypes for HSA Benefit Plans are not showing up in the payroll log. For other empls, all is fine.
    Here's what the payroll log in running regular payroll looks like in processing of function P0169 for this HSA benefit plan:
    =========================================================
    BAdI "Evaluate Ee Contrib" implemented
    Calculated contributions:
    Employee contribution pre-tax: 35.00 USD Weekly
    No rollover of pre-tax to post-tax contributions
    Post-tax contributions start only after pre-tax limit is reached
    BAdI "Check Contribution Limits" implemented
    BAdI "Evaluate Er Contrib" implemented
    Final result contributions:
    Employee contribution pre-tax: 35.00 USD
    Employer contribution: 19.24 USD
    BAdI "Proration" implemented
    Processing proration for 12/27/2010 - 12/27/2010 results in:
    ========================================================
    Here no wagetype is showing up though they are getting calculated above.
    Regards,
    Somdeb.

    The issue has been resolved.
    The Savings Plan HSAF had a co-requisite Health Plan HDP and we had to add this co-requisite plan for the empl.
    Also the P0169 function had to be changed from BEG to CHK in the payroll schema which did the trick.
    Regards,
    Somdeb.

  • Benefit Error "No Benefit Plans found for Program Grouping"

    Hi Experts,
    While running Report for Employee Eligibility RPLBEN01 it through an Error Message
    "No Benefit Plans found for Program Grouping 1st/2nd"
    I have configured 1st and 2nd Program Grouping and maintained respective features also.
    Can any body guide me to clear this issue.
    Thanks in Advance.
    vnk

    check this view V_T5UBU whether you have created the record for you plan against your first program grouping and second program grping

  • Benefit Termination Rule

    Hi All,
    Does anyone know how to setup a Benefit Termination Rule based upon the employees last paycheck (or last pay date)?
    The issue we have is when an employee is separating from the company, its not taking the last FSA deduction. Our current term rule is 'immediate'. I though of maybe just using a number of days (ex. 15 days from term date), but was wondering if there was a better known solution.
    Any help is appreciated.
    Thanks
    B-

    Hi,
    You can do this by configuring as below.
    PM->Benefits->Flexible Administration->Programs->Participation Termination->Define Termination Groupings
    PM->Benefits->Flexible Administration->Programs->Participation Termination->Define Termination Variants
    PM->Benefits->Flexible Administration->Programs->Participation Termination->Define Termination Rules
    In the step Define Termination Rules you can specify that the termination should be immediate and on the last working day.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Ilyas

  • Benefit Plan Tremination Thru ess

    HI,
    can the benefit plan enrollment can be terminated in the portal ess...
    is there any standard available..
    Thanks,
    Nachy

    Hi Nashi,
    I'm afraid currently termination rule are only checked via termination workbench (HRBEN**, in R/3).
    This functionality is not available in ITS or ESS.
    You may have to develop the same in a custom program (or raise a development request.
    Kind regards
    Sarah

  • How to remove Benefit plans from enrollment?

    Hi all,
    While Benefit enrollment testing i need to remove some plans from plans list.(not be shown in enrollment testing)Can anyone tell me how to remove these plans in enrollment testing only?
    Thanks!
    Seema.

    Hi,
    The enrollment of a Benefit Plan for an employee is dependent on the First Program Grouping and the Second Program Groupings assigned to him/her in the General Benefits Information (0171) Infotype.
    Technically speaking, we can enroll/not enroll the employees for Plans only based on these groupings. All the Plans are displayed for employees, but they can enroll ony in a few based on these groupings.
    Since your requirement is to not display them only in testing, and moreover, you do not want to touch the back end configuration settings, we may have to run some report to fix your issue.
    Thanks and Regards,
    S. Veenadhari.

  • The Benefit Plan in the latest OPA release does not seem to work with Siebe

    I've installed the latest version of OPA (10.0.1.14.0) and it came with a Benefit Plan example. The Income Thresholds.xls and Interpretative.dox are missing so it can not be compiled.
    Also the OPA Connector Developer Help has a section for this tutorial which explains how to use the Benefit Plan example in Siebel. However I cannot see how by clicking the 'Eligibility' button on HLS Case Form Applet, it is going to call OPA to run the Benefit rules.
    Can someone please explain how to get this example working with OPA?
    I understand that from Siebel you need to call the 'Policy Automation Assess Workflow' to pass in the relevant data to OPA, but I don't understand how this workflow is being called in the Benefit Plan example? The 'Eligibility' button called a method 'CreateBenefitPlan' which is a user property on 'HLS Case' BC and all it does is a RefreshRecord. So I can't see exactly what is being done behind.

    It should be mad clearer in the help but this example is reliant on the Siebel 8.2 public sector version.

  • I have an apple id for my ipod touch at home. My company is planning to issuing Ipads. Should I use the same apple id on the ipad for those apps I purchase and would like to purchase and use on my work ipad?

    I have an apple id for my ipod touch at home. My company is planning to issuing Ipads. Should I use the same apple id on the ipad for those apps I purchase and would like to use on my work ipad?

    Yes, otherwise you will have to pay for those apps again. If an app is purchased by one Apple ID, he/she will be able to redownload it again for no cost (note: this does apply to songs, but NOT to movies).

  • New planned goods issue date during delivery creation due to changed route

    Hello All,
    I have defined 2 routes with different values for transit time and transporation lead times. I have configured routes such that in order creation - route A is determined and while delivery creation due to weight group - delivery B is determined.
    Now for Route A i have maintained transit time of 3 days and Transportation lead time of 4 days and for Route B it is 1 day each.
    Delivery scheduling is active for the order type.
    Now when i create the order with a delivery date of say 05/24/2010 then (route A with transit time of 3 days) is determined and the planned goods issue date of 05/21/2010 is in the order.
    Now while creating delivery (Route B which has transit time 1 day) is determined due to the weight group. But the planned goods issue date is still the same 05/21/2010 as in order.
    I am assuming that since the route B has a route of 1 day so the planned goods issue date should be re-determined to 05/23/2010? IS there no scheduling done during delivery creation even though route and subsequently transit time has changed?
    Please let me know the answer to this...
    Thanks
    Shobhit

    Hi ,
    You can use TA - MASS . Enter object type - BUS2032(for sales orders) on initial screen and select sales item data.
    Next screen enter selection fields like sales order no and items. After giving order no and item range , execute and enter all new values for any item data fields. After pressing button "carry out mass change", don't forget to press save button.

Maybe you are looking for