Best ap for changing pixel aspect

This is an off shoot off my previous question. I think I have the aspect raion thing dialed now (FC has fudged this a bit in their manuals). I can change aspect in FC, Motion, and Photoshop, do any of these do a better job? and, as far as scaling images (stills) does motion do a better job (qualitatively) then FC?
thanks, nils

transco:
The frames at 1440 x 1080 are already in the 1:3 ratio. 1980 x 1080 is a ratio of 1:8. You shouldn't have to do any cropping or re-sizing at all. Just select the photo and in the Print window select N-up and 2 per page. Then under the PDF menu at the bottom select Save as PDF. That will give you just what you want.
Do you Twango?
TIP: For insurance against the iPhoto database corruption that many users have experienced I recommend making a backup copy of the Library6.iPhoto database file and keep it current. If problems crop up where iPhoto suddenly can't see any photos or thinks there are no photos in the library, replacing the working Library6.iPhoto file with the backup will often get the library back. By keeping it current I mean backup after each import and/or any serious editing or work on books, slideshows, calendars, cards, etc. That insures that if a problem pops up and you do need to replace the database file, you'll retain all those efforts. It doesn't take long to make the backup and it's good insurance.
I've written an Automator workflow application (requires Tiger), iPhoto dB File Backup, that will copy the selected Library6.iPhoto file from your iPhoto Library folder to the Pictures folder, replacing any previous version of it. You can download it at Toad's Cellar. Be sure to read the Read Me pdf file.

Similar Messages

What is the best practice for changing view states?

I have a component with two Pie Charts that display
percentages at two specific dates (think start and end values).
But, I have three views: Start Value only, End Value only, or show
Both. I am using a ToggleButtonBar to control the display. What is
the best practice for changing this kind of view state? Right now
(since this code was inherited), the view states are changed in an
ActionScript function which sets the visible and includeInLayout
properties on each Pie Chart based on the selectedIndex of the
ToggleButtonBar, but, this just doesn't seem like the best way to
do this - not very dynamic. I'd like to be able to change the state
based on the name of the selectedItem, in case the order of the
ToggleButtons changes, and since I am storing the name of the
selectedItem for future reference.
Would using States be better? If so, what would be the best
way to implement this?
Thanks.

I would stick with non-states, as I have always heard that
states are more for smaller components that need to change under
certain conditions, like a login screen that changes if the user
needs to register.
That said, if the UI of what you are dealing with is not
overly complex, and if it will not become overly complex, maybe
states is the way to go.
Looking at your code, I don't think you'll save much in terms
of lines of code.

Change Pixel Aspect Ratio Once Already Started?

I've been having trouble with my video looking extremely blurry -- I thought it had to do with rendering but it looks the same rendered as it did before rendering. I think I figured out that it has to do with the pixel aspect ratio being too small (or is it frame size, or are those the same thing? It's all very confusing for me!). The final output for this video is YouTube, but it also looks blurry within Premiere (mainly when stretching the Program Monitor so I can see it larger).
I helped on a video a few months ago that looked perfect, everything was really crisp in Premiere (after rendering, that is) and when exported to YT. The pixel aspect ratio was 1920x1080 for this video, and the one I'm working on now is 720x480.
So, can I enhance the pixel aspect ratio of the video I'm working on now? If I'm not able to change the pixel aspect ratio once I've started the project, what would be your advice going forward?
Thanks, and please let me know if you need any more information!

You need to be sure your sequence setting matches
the frame size and aspect ratio of your source media.
To create a sequence that matches your footage, try this:
Once you have created a properly configured sequence,
you can copy (Ctrl+C) then paste (Ctrl+V) your already edited
clips into the newly created sequence.
Also:
Changing a Sequence to Match a Clip
http://www.video2brain.com/en/lessons/changing-a-sequence-to-match-a-clip
Create a sequence
http://help.adobe.com/en_US/premierepro/cs/using/WS3E67AF4C-B2A2-4f04-90B4-F8CCFB74B144.ht ml#WSd79b3ca3b623cac941d41a681247d1f35a4-7fff
What's the best export format or codec?
http://www.video2brain.com/en/lessons/whats-the-best-export-format-or-codec

Changing pixel aspect ratio during cropping (LR3.2)

When I crop sometimes the pixel aspect ratio changes here. I.e. the pic get stretched in horizontal or vertical way/or compressed. Any body seeing this also? After some time it does change to normal, but it makes cropping rather difficult when in a hurry.

I'm not sure I understand your problem, but I think what bothers you is the technique that has been in place in LR2 already for switching between landscape and potrait format of the crop, which in LR3 can be acomplished by the X keyboard shortcut.
Moving your mouse horizontally or vertically on a locked aspect ratio, the format will change from portrait to landscape or vice versa. To enlarge or diminish the size of the crop, you have to move the mouse diagonally.
Beat Gossweiler
Switzerland

Changing Pixel Aspect in a Photoshop Menu used in Encore

Using CS3 Suite/Windows. Took a frame from video to use as menu. Photoshop changed the pixel aspect to 1.O. Can't get Encore to change it back. The "Interpret Footage" selection is grayed out. Thanks in advance.

I took a frame out of some motion graphics in the video to use as background for my menu...added a layer for the button. Photoshop evidently changes the pixel aspect to square...you have to change it back in Photoshop...
Back with CS2 versions, that did work perfectly and the PAR was retained from PrPro to PS to En. It seems that as of CS4 (do not recall hearing of it in CS3, but Stanley can address that), things changed and the PAR from the still Export became Square Pixels. Also, Adobe changed the rounding of the PAR's for rectangular pixels just a bit. What versions are you using?
Good luck,
Hunt

How do i change pixel aspect ratio of an image in elements9?

My camera only shoots in one format ratio, i would like to change images to 2:1, or 1:2. Without cropping or letterboxing. (Hence i think it is the 'pixel' aspect ratio i need to alter, not the 'picture' aspect ratio). Is this possible in elements or is it something else i can't do in elements; and just another reason why i should've bought CS5 instead??

You can use a custom crop and Elements will automatically re-sample the pixels. You won’t get any distortion but you will sacrifice part of the image.
In this example the original image was 3872 x 2592
I divided 3872 by 2 and changed the height in the options bar to 1936
Part of the sky had to go but still a pleasing result.
Result
You can position the crop shield anywhere. e.g. depending on the original you may want to loose part of the top or bottom. Simply move the image around to get the best composition then hit the green checkmark.

Change pixel aspect ratio

Hi all,
My school requires me to produce all my videos in a format of 768px by 576px, square pixels, PAL format. I need to know how to change the pixel aspect ratio to 768x576 with the standard PAL format and square pixels. I can see that when you start a project you can set the size, but the boxes that contain the pixel size are shadowed out and I can't select them to change them. I have also tried to modify the project after it was created, using project settings and sequence settings, but again, I was not able to select the boxes that included the pixel aspect ratio.
Please help soon, as my project is due within hours.

My source material is 768x576 animations from Maya. The output needs to be .avi format, but it's not going onto a DVD or a DV tape or a web video, it just needs to be uploaded to my instructor's computer.
I am trying to export a file with the correct aspect ratio now. I set the output to codec=none, and changed the aspect ratio to 768x576. It seems unable to output the file, as I have tried four times and it has given me an error each time. Is a codec necessary? Is that what's freaking it out?
Also, the final video will only be 2:28 long, and I have set the scratch disk to a drive on my computer that has 78 GB free, so I hope it is not running out of processing space.
Thank you for your help and patience with this problem. I'm not sure I get the reason for the format myself, which is probably why I'm having trouble explaining why this is so important. However, my instructor told us numerous times that we absolutely had to have a final file that was 768x576, so I figured I had to make every effort to get it done that way.

Yikes! Need to change pixel aspect ratio.

Hey folks, please be gentle, I'm really new to After Effects.
I created a fairly large composition in AE CS3. The dimensions are correct for the ultimate deployment (1536 x 680) but I've just discovered that my pixel aspect ratio was set incorrectly. I have it set to "D1/DV NTSC Widescreen (1.2)" and it needed to be set to "Square Pixels." So when I preview my project there are black bars top and bottom. When I change the pixel aspect ratio of my compositions to "Square Pixels" it literally cuts off my content on both sides. Gah. I don't have the time to rebuild the entire project!
Any suggestions? All help is much appreciated. Thanks!

Mylenium, thank you! Yeah, pixels are pixels, darn it!
Please let me just clarify ...
In my Render Queue I go to Output Module Settings and choose something like "JPEG Sequence" and render it out. (Will that make, like, a million individual files? I've got 3 compositions and they're all about 3 minutes long.)
Then create a new composition that is the correct size AND pixel aspect ratio.
Then import whatever was rendered out.
Sorry for the need for hand-holding!

Changing Pixel Aspect Ratio with Aperture

i was wondering if aperture has a way of changing the pixel aspect ratio from square to DI/DV NTSC or HDV. so far i am using photoshop to do that but would love to do it inside aperture.

Not that I'm aware of. Pixels are pixels to Aperture. You could always crop your images to the right aspect ratio.
If you're looking to burn photos to DVD perhaps iDVD or DVD Studio Pro could resize your images to the proper size.

Best Practice for Change Maintenance Order Number Range

Hello
We have decided that our Maintenance Orders will always start with the year of the open date. Example 201112345155
Every year we will need to change the number ranges
What is the best practice to change the order number range? What is the best approach here?
I have also another question. Why the "Current Number" is not incremental?
Thanks for the help

Hi,
The current number can be explained by use of buffering of the numbers. Buffering is defined via transaction SNRO, the AUFTRAG object is relevant for orders. When buffering is active, a set of unused numbers are assigned to each application server.
In your example - The fiirst 20 numbers were taken from the available number range and assigned to the buffer (possible 10 numbers to each of two servers). As orders are created a number is assigned from the buffer. Once the buffer values are used a further set of numbers are taken from the number range and the current number is increased (by buffer value).
-Paul

Interpretation rules not working; can't change pixel aspect ratio

Hi,
I'm following the instructions on the Adobe help site here...
http://helpx.adobe.com/premiere-pro/using/aspect-ratios.html
...so that I may use custom pixel aspect ratios in the interpret footage dialog box.
Unfortunately none of my changes to this file have any effect, and I'm clueless. These are cinemaDNG sequences and I'd like to keep working with them raw, otherwise I would take the time to export them and stretch them en masse through AE.

Hi Kevin, a mix of BMPCC and 5Dmk3 Magic Lantern. ML raw at 60p has a non-standard PAR, most of my footage is shot in this format. I need 0.65, the closest is 0.9091. I was disappointed at first to find no ability to manually enter the value, then elated to find the Interpretation rules text file, then disappointed again to find it doesn't work...hoping this ends well!

Best practice for Changing OWA URL

Hi,
we have an exchange 2010 environment where our cas array fqdn is mail.domain.com our owa address is also mail.domain.com
this was working fine for us for a while but we have purchases a hardware load balancer and their best practice is to have the connections to the cas array on 1 VIP and the OWA on a second VIP, I have created a DNS record both externally and internally for
OWA as webmail.domain.com and have updated our SSL certificate to include this. the fqdn for the cas array will stay the same. I am just looking for some advice on what all needs to be changed and if there will be any impact to the users, can I simply
change the internal and external URL for each of the 2 servers in EMC for OWA,ECP,activesync, and OAB, is this best practice? will this have any impact on users currently connected when the change is made? will previously connected machines pick up on
the changes right away?
Thanks,

If you have updated the records in DNS...
If you have changed the name on the certificate...
You should be fine.
I would also change the internal and external URLs as you plan to (even though OWA, for example, will work without an URL configured here - not sure about a incorrect URL however).
When we make changes to these CAS settings we usually run this command afterwards:
iisreset /noforce
I would make the change outside of business hours and test. There are no client-side changes to make and clients *should* adjust to the new settings on the next session - but I am not sure there would be no interruption to an existing connection (?).
Clients might have to clear their cache (cookies).
Clients might have problems if they have shortcuts to the old URL.
That is why I would test first.
Follow your organization's change control process if you have one.
Please mark as helpful if you find my contribution useful or as an answer if it does answer your question. That will encourage me - and others - to take time out to help you.

Oracle Best practices for changing Byte to Char on Varchar2 columns

Dear Team,
Application Team wanted to change Byte to Char on Varchar2 columns to accommodate Multi byte character on couple of production tables.
Wanted to know is it safe to have mixture of BYTE and CHAR semantics in the same table i have read on the couple of documents that It's good practice to avoid using a mixture of BYTE and CHAR semantics columns in the same table.
What happens if we have mixture of BYTE and CHAR semantics columns in the same table?
Do we need to gather stats & rebuild indexes on the table after these column changes .
Thanks in Advance !!!
SK

Application Team wanted to change Byte to Char on Varchar2 columns to accommodate Multi byte character on couple of production tables.
Wanted to know is it safe to have mixture of BYTE and CHAR semantics in the same table i have read on the couple of documents that It's good practice to avoid using a mixture of BYTE and CHAR semantics columns in the same table.
No change is needed to 'accommodate Multibyte characters'. That support has NOTHING to do with whether a column is specified using BYTE or CHAR.
In 11g the limit for a VARCHAR2 column is 4000 bytes, period. If you specify CHAR and try to insert 1001 characters that each take 4 bytes you will get an exception since that would require 4004 bytes and the limit is 4000 bytes.
In practice the use of CHAR is mostly a convenience to the developer when defining columns for multibyte characters. For example for a NAME column you might want to make sure Oracle will allocate room for 50 characters REGARDLESS of the actual length in bytes.
If you provide a name of 50 one byte characters then only 50 bytes will be used. Provide a name of 50 four byte characters and 200 bytes will be used.
So if that NAME column was defined using BYTE how would you know what length to use for the column? Fifty BYTES will seldom be long enough and 200 bytes SEEMS large since the business user wants a limit of FIFTY characters.
That is why such columns would typically use CHAR; so that the length (fifty) defined for the column matches the logical length of the number of characters.
What happens if we have mixture of BYTE and CHAR semantics columns in the same table?
Nothing happens - Oracle could care less.
Do we need to gather stats & rebuild indexes on the table after these column changes .
No - not if you by 'need' you mean simply because you made ONLY that change.
But that begs the question: if the table already exists, has data and has been in use without their being any problems then why bother changing things now?
In other words: if it ain't broke why try to fix it?
So back to your question of 'best practices'
Best practices is to set the length semantics at the database level when the database is first created and to then use that same setting (BYTE or CHAR) when you create new objects or make DDL changes.
Best practices is also to not fix things that aren't broken.
See the 'Length Semantics' section of the globalization support guide for more best practices
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/server.112/e10729/ch2charset.htm#i1006683

Best Practice for Changing the Cell-Renderer in a TreeTab

I've implemented a TreeTable (sap.ui.table.TreeTable). Now, I would like to change the way how table cells are being rendered. Intuitively, I would create a subclass "myrenderer" which extends sap.ui.table.TableRenderer.renderTableCell and assign this renderer as cell renderer with something like (pseudocode):
myTreeTable.setCellRenderer(myrenderer);
Any help/hint would be appreciated. An example would be appreciated even more ;-).
Bye
Christian

Hi Christian
You can extend from sap.ui.table.TreeTable like this Example
-D

The (new) Premiere pixel aspect ratio is wrong for my PAL DV cam footage

I've had a Sony TRV-950E DV-cam since 2003. I've been shooting DV PAL in widescreen.
I just bought Elements 12 to edit my footage, and discovered that the pixel aspect ratio for D1/DV PAL Widescreen has been updated to 1.46 (old value 1.42).
The theory behind this change is that video recorded on 720x576 is slightly wider than 16:9 and that the 16:9 portion is 704x576.
Unfortunately this is not correct for my footage! I've captured the video from my DV-cam (by firewire) and opened it in Premere and it is streched to be shown as 1050x576.
So I did a test:
I filmed a steady shot of a perfect circle and captured the video from the camera and opened it in Premiere. The pixel ascpect ratio 1.46 makes the display 1050x576.
The question is: Am I seeing this displayed as a perfect circle now?
This can be tested:
I make a picture of a perfect circle in Photoshop (square pixels) with size 1024x576. I imported this picture into the Premiere project, and match the two circles: The filmed one, and the Photoshop one.
They DO NOT match! The one on the video is slightly stretched in width.
So then I stretch the Photoshop picture in width to become 1050x576. I then import this picture into the project. And now I have a perfect match between the circles!
This means that my DV camera actually records a 100% 16:9 picture on all the pixels 720x576 - and not a slightly wider picture with the 16:9 part being in 704x576 (which is the reason for the change in pixel aspect ratio from 1.42 to 1.46).
I have some HD scenes that I want to import (and downscale) into my SD project also, and I also have a lot of still pictures.
Unless I can change the setup i Elements to the correct ratio 1.42, these stills and sqare-pixel-video (HD) should ideally be streched from 1024x576 to 1050x576 to match (become equally stretched as) all the SD footage.
How do I solve this?
I just bought Elements 12 three days ago.
(I just tried opening the captured video in Windows Movie Maker - and that program must use pixel aspect ratio 1.42 since the video is diplayed correctly as 1024x576 with a perfect circle)
Regards,
Tom from Norway

Tom
After much thought and exploration and experimentation, I have come to the conclusion that there is no practical purpose for doing anything other than importing your media into the project and editing/exporting. I find no distortion in doing so, be it in the video samples that you posted or in still models that I created for the pixel aspect ratio 1.422 vs 1.4587 for D1/DV PAL Widescreen.
If you have not already, please read the following about the Adobe DV Widescreen Pixel Aspect Ratio change from 1.422 to 1.456.
Please start in the first link which gives some get subsequent links in it
http://forums.adobe.com/thread/673877
http://www.mikeafford.com/blog/2009/03/pal-d1-dv-widescreen-square-pixel-settings-in-after -effects-cs4-vs-cs3/
Also, you may find the following article on square and non square pixels of interest. It uses the PAL DV Widescreen 1.422 pixel aspect ratio in its discussion.
http://library.creativecow.net/articles/gerard_rick/pixel_madness.php
Aside from the explanation for the rights and wrongs of the matter, this is what I actually observed taking your PAL DV AVI Widescreen and PAL MPEG2.mpg Widescreen into the same Premiere Elements 12 Windows PAL DV Widescreen project. Along with your video files were still images that I created in Photoshop Elements 11 Full Editor:
1024 x 576 document with a red circle on Layer 2 of the Layers Palette
1050 x 576 document with a red circle on Layer 1 of the Layers Palette.
The red circles were superimposed in creation. The difference in the pixel dimensions between the two are evidenced by Layer 1 content peaking through on the left and right.
The gpsot readout for pixel aspect ratio for each of the videos was
a. Your PAL DV AVI 720 x 576 Widescreen = 1.422
b. Your PAL MPEG2.mpg 720 x 576 Widescreen = 1.422
Each of the Photoshop Elements documents (circles) saved as .psd files 1050 x 576 pixels.
When all were taken into Premiere Elements 12 project manually set for PAL DV Widescreen, they looked like the following, no display of distortion.......
PAL DV AVI Widescreen 720 x 576 (now the pixel aspect ratio in Premiere Elements Properties was shown as 1.4587, not the 1.422 seen in gspot before import)
PAL MPEG2.mpg Widescreen 720 x 576 (now the pixel aspect ratio in Premiere Elements 12 Properties was shown as 1.4587, not the 1.422 seen in gspot before import)
Edit Menu/Preferences/General with check mark next to "Default Scale to Frame Size" was in effect.
As for the red circles stills (1050 x 576 to equate to the square pixel version of 720 x 576 widescreen) did not distort when brought into the Premiere Elements 12 Edit area monitor which is established by the PAL DV Widescreen project preset with the pixel aspect ratio = 1.4587.
The jpg version of the Photoshop Elements document (.psd) 1050 x 576 pixels (square pixels) looked like:
And, when this Timeline was exported Publish+Share/Computer/AVI with the DV PAL Widescreen preset, there was no distortion in the export. It looked undistorted as it did before export.
So, unless I am overlooking a key point here, I cannot see a reason why you cannot use the video sources that you presented for sampling as weil as stills with the 1050 x 576 pixel dimensions.
The only time I see any distortion possibilities is if you use a player that does not recognize the 16:9 flag that stretches the 720 x 576 to 1050 x 576 for display after encoding.
Trying to convert Premiere Elements 12 which uses the 1.4587 pixel aspect ratio for PAL DV Widescreen into a Premiere Elements 7 which uses the 1.422 pixel aspect ratio for PAL DV Widescreen is up hill in spite of creative thinking on your side.
Please review and let me know if you are seeing another different from what I am reporting with the samples that you posted.
Thank you.
ATR

Best ap for changing pixel aspect

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for