Best flash detect to html

Hi there,
What's the best way to add a flash detect to a html page.
I have a html page with a flash element in a DIV. (but without prober flash detect).
Now i'm confused about the generated code after publishing my flash file.
What part of code should I put in my html file, or is it possible to link to a 'universal js file'?
I published for flash player 9 from flash 10.0.
Thnx.
Pascal

Thanks for your answer but there's a lot off code. (See attached)
Should this all be placed in a div?
And isn't it possible to place this in a seperate file?
Pascal

Similar Messages

Help Editing code from a published html file with flash detection enabled from flash

hi guys ive publish a html file with flash detection enabled from flash
heres the code from the publish html:

<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" />
<title>main</title>
<script language="javascript"> AC_FL_RunContent = 0; </script>
<script language="javascript"> DetectFlashVer = 0; </script>
<script src="AC_RunActiveContent.js" language="javascript"></script>
<script language="JavaScript" type="text/javascript">

</script>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff">


<script language="JavaScript" type="text/javascript">

</script>
<noscript>
     // Provide alternate content for browsers that do not support scripting
     // or for those that have scripting disabled.
       Alternate HTML content should be placed here. This content requires the Adobe Flash Player.
       <a href="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflash/">Get Flash</a>
</noscript>
</body>
</html>
now since the default codes places my flash movie on upper left corner, ive made my own tables with the flash on it, how or where do i place this code to the upper codes?
<table width="100%" height="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tr>
    <th valign="middle" scope="col"><table width="800" border="0" align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
      <tr>
        <th height="600" bgcolor="#333333" scope="col"><script type="text/javascript">
AC_FL_RunContent( 'codebase','http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=9,0,28,0','wid th','800','height','600','src','main','quality','high','pluginspage','http://www.adobe.com /shockwave/download/download.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash','movie','main' ); //end AC code
</script><noscript><object classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=9,0,28,0" width="800" height="600">
          <param name="movie" value="main.swf">
          <param name="quality" value="high">
          <embed src="main.swf" quality="high" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/shockwave/download/download.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="800" height="600"></embed>
        </object></noscript></th>
      </tr>
    </table></th>
</tr>
<tr>
    <td height="30" bgcolor="#990000"><table width="800" border="0" align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
      <tr>
        <th scope="col"><table width="800" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
          <tr>
            <th scope="col"><div align="left" class="style1">Copyright 2009 St. Paul of the Cross Parish. All Rights reserved.</div></th>
            <th width="400" scope="col"><div align="right" class="style1">Usage outside our permissions guidelines requires our prior written consent.</div></th>
          </tr>
        </table></th>
      </tr>
    </table></td>
</tr>
</table>
Tnx in advance!

Hi
Can you tell me which version of dreamweaver you are using (and flash pro, if you have it), as the code you provided has element of a number of different versions (e.g. your js flash files are reasonably new, but your flash inserted into the html body is old, but with the cs3 version of flash player indicated!). Also the detect flash file is no longer required.
PZ

Overlay Flash content with HTML

I have been working to fix a layout that uses DHTML menus and
has Flash in the middle of the page... Like many others I am having
some issues with the DHTML menu not overlaying the Flash content.
I have read this post :
Fixing
Safari's wmode flicker that looked to be the solution but in
this case it did not work all together...
Here is a
link to the site...
I had tried using an class on the <li> tags that gave
it a background image. This worked in IE 6 & 7 and FF on Mac
but it did not work on FF on Windows... I thought that might be as
close as I could get for the moment so I added in SWFobject for my
Flash detection and Alt display and now none of the above works at
all...
So my question is... What is the "Best Standard" for
accomplishing this overlay of Flash with HTML content?
If you can provide relative links to the topic for reference
that would be helpful too... I've only been able to locate a few
with one being here in the CSS Advisor beta.

Correction: This class with on the <li> tag corrected
this in all browsers except Safari... When I added the SWFobject
for detection / alt content it caused the overlay to no longer
function.

Flash detection

I've got a problem with the javascript which should detect
the flash plugin version, if it is deactivated or if there is a
flash plugin installed. I deactivated Flash in my browser. Now I
want my page to tell me that I have to activate the flash plugin.
If I try it locally on my pc everything works fine. If I try to
upload it on our server it don't work. and my page shows a broken
image and seem to find a flash version. Our server is a linux
mashine. Does anybody know something about this problem? Might be a
problem to receive the data via HTTP?

123akru wrote:
> Hello Paul,
>
> i tried to get some help from there. That doesn't work
unfortunately.
> Nobody answered my questions :-( I don't think that it
is a HTML problem
> because everything works fine locally. Mitght be a
problem, that
> informations about the flash plugin are transferred via
the HTTP Header.
> Do you have any experiences with it ?
>
> Thanks for your help.
> Greetings!
HI! below is part of the swfobject code that is located in
the HTML page.
The first part in between the divs is displayed if the user
does not have
Flash plugin installed.
The next part has the movie to be played with the version
that is needed for
it to be played. in this case its version 8.0.22
This also works with the so.setAttribute("redirectUrl", IF
Flash is
detected but is lower than 8.0.22 then goto ExpressInstall
BUT IF the users
version is less than is needed for ExpressInstall to work
THEN "redirectUrl"
is used to redirect the user to another html page.
In that case it would be
"Errors_warnings/flash_not_detected.asp".
If you go back to geoff page and scroll down a bit you will
find that he
does has some examples of flash detect, flash verison, flash
expressInstall
( which will upgrade the users flash plugin automaticly). and
has a full
tutorial.
Usually people do reply as I am now, you must of hit slow
week.
Paul
<div id="flashcontent">
Error! You do not have a flash plugin.<BR><a
href="Errors_warnings/flash_not_detected.asp">Click here
to get
plugin.</a></div>
<script type="text/javascript">
// <![CDATA[
var so = new SWFObject("my_flash_movie.swf", "fotester",
"593", "150",
"8.0.22", "#FFFFFF");
so.addVariable("flashVarText", "this is passed in via
FlashVars");
so.setAttribute("redirectUrl",
"Errors_warnings/flash_not_detected.asp");
so.useExpressInstall('goto_expressinstall.swf');
so.addParam("wmode", "transparent");
so.write("flashcontent");
// ]]>
</script>

What is the best malwear detection and protection for use on a Mac?

What is the best malwear detection and protection for use on a Mac?

Mac users often ask whether they should install "anti-virus" software. The answer usually given on ASC is "no." The answer is right, but it may give the wrong impression that there is no threat from what are loosely called "viruses." There is a threat, and you need to educate yourself about it.
1. This is a comment on what you should—and should not—do to protect yourself from malicious software ("malware") that circulates on the Internet and gets onto a computer as an unintended consequence of the user's actions. It does not apply to software, such as keystroke loggers, that may be installed deliberately by an intruder who has hands-on access to the computer, or who has been able to log in to it remotely. That threat is in a different category, and there's no easy way to defend against it.
The comment is long because the issue is complex. The key points are in sections 5, 6, and 10.
OS X now implements three layers of built-in protection specifically against malware, not counting runtime protections such as execute disable, sandboxing, system library randomization, and address space layout randomization that may also guard against other kinds of exploits.
2. All versions of OS X since 10.6.7 have been able to detect known Mac malware in downloaded files, and to block insecure web plugins. This feature is transparent to the user. Internally Apple calls it "XProtect."
The malware recognition database used by XProtect is automatically updated; however, you shouldn't rely on it, because the attackers are always at least a day ahead of the defenders.
The following caveats apply to XProtect:
☞ It can be bypassed by some third-party networking software, such as BitTorrent clients and Java applets.
☞ It only applies to software downloaded from the network. Software installed from a CD or other media is not checked.
As new versions of OS X are released, it's not clear whether Apple will indefinitely continue to maintain the XProtect database of older versions such as 10.6. The security of obsolete system versions may eventually be degraded. Security updates to the code of obsolete systems will stop being released at some point, and that may leave them open to other kinds of attack besides malware.
3. Starting with OS X 10.7.5, there has been a second layer of built-in malware protection, designated "Gatekeeper" by Apple. By default, applications and Installer packages downloaded from the network will only run if they're digitally signed by a developer with a certificate issued by Apple. Software certified in this way hasn't necessarily been tested by Apple, but you can be reasonably sure that it hasn't been modified by anyone other than the developer. His identity is known to Apple, so he could be held legally responsible if he distributed malware. That may not mean much if the developer lives in a country with a weak legal system (see below.)
Gatekeeper doesn't depend on a database of known malware. It has, however, the same limitations as XProtect, and in addition the following:
☞ It can easily be disabled or overridden by the user.
☞ A malware attacker could get control of a code-signing certificate under false pretenses, or could simply ignore the consequences of distributing codesigned malware.
☞ An App Store developer could find a way to bypass Apple's oversight, or the oversight could fail due to human error.
Apple has so far failed to revoke the codesigning certificates of some known abusers, thereby diluting the value of Gatekeeper and the Developer ID program. These failures don't involve App Store products, however.
For the reasons given, App Store products, and—to a lesser extent—other applications recognized by Gatekeeper as signed, are safer than others, but they can't be considered absolutely safe. "Sandboxed" applications may prompt for access to private data, such as your contacts, or for access to the network. Think before granting that access. Sandbox security is based on user input. Never click through any request for authorization without thinking.
4. Starting with OS X 10.8.3, a third layer of protection has been added: a "Malware Removal Tool" (MRT). MRT runs automatically in the background when you update the OS. It checks for, and removes, malware that may have evaded the other protections via a Java exploit (see below.) MRT also runs when you install or update the Apple-supplied Java runtime (but not the Oracle runtime.) Like XProtect, MRT is effective against known threats, but not against unknown ones. It notifies you if it finds malware, but otherwise there's no user interface to MRT.
5. The built-in security features of OS X reduce the risk of malware attack, but they are not, and never will be, complete protection. Malware is foremost a problem of human behavior, and no technological fix alone is going to solve it. Trusting software to protect you will only make you more vulnerable.
The best defense is always going to be your own intelligence. With the possible exception of Java exploits, all known malware circulating on the Internet that affects a fully-updated installation of OS X 10.6 or later takes the form of so-called "Trojan horses," which can only have an effect if the victim is duped into running them. The threat therefore amounts to a battle of wits between you and Internet criminals. If you're better informed than they think you are, you'll win. That means, in practice, that you always stay within a safe harbor of computing practices. How do you know when you're leaving the safe harbor? Below are some warning signs of danger.
Software from an untrustworthy source
☞ Software of any kind is distributed via BitTorrent, or Usenet, or on a website that also distributes pirated music or movies.
☞ Software with a corporate brand, such as Adobe Flash Player, doesn't come directly from the developer’s website. Do not trust an alert from any website to update Flash, or your browser, or any other software.
☞ Rogue websites such as Softonic, Soft32, and CNET Download distribute free applications that have been packaged in a superfluous "installer."
☞ The software is advertised by means of spam or intrusive web ads. Any ad, on any site, that includes a direct link to a download should be ignored.
Software that is plainly illegal or does something illegal
☞ High-priced commercial software such as Photoshop is "cracked" or "free."
☞ An application helps you to infringe copyright, for instance by circumventing the copy protection on commercial software, or saving streamed media for reuse without permission. All "YouTube downloaders" are in this category, though not all are necessarily malicious.
Conditional or unsolicited offers from strangers
☞ A telephone caller or a web page tells you that you have a “virus” and offers to help you remove it. (Some reputable websites did legitimately warn visitors who were infected with the "DNSChanger" malware. That exception to this rule no longer applies.)
☞ A web site offers free content such as video or music, but to use it you must install a “codec,” “plug-in,” "player," "downloader," "extractor," or “certificate” that comes from that same site, or an unknown one.
☞ You win a prize in a contest you never entered.
☞ Someone on a message board such as this one is eager to help you, but only if you download an application of his choosing.
☞ A "FREE WI-FI !!!" network advertises itself in a public place such as an airport, but is not provided by the management.
☞ Anything online that you would expect to pay for is "free."
Unexpected events
☞ A file is downloaded automatically when you visit a web page, with no other action on your part. Delete any such file without opening it.
☞ You open what you think is a document and get an alert that it's "an application downloaded from the Internet." Click Cancel and delete the file. Even if you don't get the alert, you should still delete any file that isn't what you expected it to be.
☞ An application does something you don't expect, such as asking for permission to access your contacts, your location, or the Internet for no obvious reason.
☞ Software is attached to email that you didn't request, even if it comes (or seems to come) from someone you trust.
I don't say that leaving the safe harbor just once will necessarily result in disaster, but making a habit of it will weaken your defenses against malware attack. Any of the above scenarios should, at the very least, make you uncomfortable.
6. Java on the Web (not to be confused with JavaScript, to which it's not related, despite the similarity of the names) is a weak point in the security of any system. Java is, among other things, a platform for running complex applications in a web page, on the client. That was always a bad idea, and Java's developers have proven themselves incapable of implementing it without also creating a portal for malware to enter. Past Java exploits are the closest thing there has ever been to a Windows-style virus affecting OS X. Merely loading a page with malicious Java content could be harmful.
Fortunately, client-side Java on the Web is obsolete and mostly extinct. Only a few outmoded sites still use it. Try to hasten the process of extinction by avoiding those sites, if you have a choice. Forget about playing games or other non-essential uses of Java.
Java is not included in OS X 10.7 and later. Discrete Java installers are distributed by Apple and by Oracle (the developer of Java.) Don't use either one unless you need it. Most people don't. If Java is installed, disable it—not JavaScript—in your browsers.
Regardless of version, experience has shown that Java on the Web can't be trusted. If you must use a Java applet for a task on a specific site, enable Java only for that site in Safari. Never enable Java for a public website that carries third-party advertising. Use it only on well-known, login-protected, secure websites without ads. In Safari 6 or later, you'll see a lock icon in the left side of the address bar when visiting a secure site.
Stay within the safe harbor, and you’ll be as safe from malware as you can practically be. The rest of this comment concerns what you should not do to protect yourself.
7. Never install any commercial "anti-virus" (AV) or "Internet security" products for the Mac, as they are all worse than useless. If you need to be able to detect Windows malware in your files, use one of the free security apps in the Mac App Store—nothing else.
Why shouldn't you use commercial AV products?
☞ To recognize malware, the software depends on a database of known threats, which is always at least a day out of date. This technique is a proven failure, as a major AV software vendor has admitted. Most attacks are "zero-day"—that is, previously unknown. Recognition-based AV does not defend against such attacks, and the enterprise IT industry is coming to the realization that traditional AV software is worthless.
☞ Its design is predicated on the nonexistent threat that malware may be injected at any time, anywhere in the file system. Malware is downloaded from the network; it doesn't materialize from nowhere. In order to meet that nonexistent threat, commercial AV software modifies or duplicates low-level functions of the operating system, which is a waste of resources and a common cause of instability, bugs, and poor performance.
☞ By modifying the operating system, the software may also create weaknesses that could be exploited by malware attackers.
☞ Most importantly, a false sense of security is dangerous.
8. An AV product from the App Store, such as "ClamXav," has the same drawback as the commercial suites of being always out of date, but it does not inject low-level code into the operating system. That doesn't mean it's entirely harmless. It may report email messages that have "phishing" links in the body, or Windows malware in attachments, as infected files, and offer to delete or move them. Doing so will corrupt the Mail database. The messages should be deleted from within the Mail application.
An AV app is not needed, and cannot be relied upon, for protection against OS X malware. It's useful, if at all, only for detecting Windows malware, and even for that use it's not really effective, because new Windows malware is emerging much faster than OS X malware.
Windows malware can't harm you directly (unless, of course, you use Windows.) Just don't pass it on to anyone else. A malicious attachment in email is usually easy to recognize by the name alone. An actual example:
London Terror Moovie.avi [124 spaces] Checked By Norton Antivirus.exe
You don't need software to tell you that's a Windows trojan. Software may be able to tell you which trojan it is, but who cares? In practice, there's no reason to use recognition software unless an organizational policy requires it. Windows malware is so widespread that you should assume it's in every email attachment until proven otherwise. Nevertheless, ClamXav or a similar product from the App Store may serve a purpose if it satisfies an ill-informed network administrator who says you must run some kind of AV application. It's free and it won't handicap the system.
The ClamXav developer won't try to "upsell" you to a paid version of the product. Other developers may do that. Don't be upsold. For one thing, you should not pay to protect Windows users from the consequences of their choice of computing platform. For another, a paid upgrade from a free app will probably have all the disadvantages mentioned in section 7.
9. It seems to be a common belief that the built-in Application Firewall acts as a barrier to infection, or prevents malware from functioning. It does neither. It blocks inbound connections to certain network services you're running, such as file sharing. It's disabled by default and you should leave it that way if you're behind a router on a private home or office network. Activate it only when you're on an untrusted network, for instance a public Wi-Fi hotspot, where you don't want to provide services. Disable any services you don't use in the Sharing preference pane. All are disabled by default.
10. As a Mac user, you don't have to live in fear that your computer may be infected every time you install software, read email, or visit a web page. But neither can you assume that you will always be safe from exploitation, no matter what you do. Navigating the Internet is like walking the streets of a big city. It's as safe or as dangerous as you choose to make it. The greatest harm done by security software is precisely its selling point: it makes people feel safe. They may then feel safe enough to take risks from which the software doesn't protect them. Nothing can lessen the need for safe computing practices.

Help installing flash detection express

I need some help installing the flash express detection
script.
Can anyone advise me on this?
1) This tutorial assumes that you have already added the
Flash 8 detection scripts to a web page (as explained in the
synopsis
of the implementation process) and have already downloaded the
Flash Player Detection Kit:
a) After you've exported HTML with Flash detection from Flash
8, move the JavaScript code found within the template's
<head> tag to the same location in your page along with the
JavaScript include, AC_OETags.js.
What exactly is it there asking me to do here?
Export what html with flash detection?
Are they talking about when I insert the swf movie file?
Not sure what there saying!
Can you advise?
Kevin

I have several times tried to install adobe flash player (which I'l call ADF for short) and follow each step carefully, to the last step (apparently) stating that ADF is installed,but then I get an email from one source or another asking me to install ADF. I have gone through this routine a number if times, and have a bunch of "Install ADF" signs scatted all over my desktop (I have an iMac).
Most recently, I have received a message that, in order to install ADF, I need to uninstall all previous ADF's BEFORE I download and install an ADF, so I download the uninstall App, thinking I will get some instuction, with that download in uninstalling the ADF residuals on my desktop
Instead, what I get is a potful of UNINSTALL ADF units (which I don't know what to do with, littering my desktop.
HELP!
Gary Fry, Adobe ID 204233534

Flash Detection Question

I am trying to include some script for flash detection on my
site to ensure that my viewers have the right flash player. Does
the Flash Detection Kit also include detection for ActiveX? The
reason I ask is because I have a page that some of my viewer have
trouble seeing and one discovered that she could see the page after
her flash player AND ActiveX were updated. I am not sure whether my
viewers problem is an old flash player or old ActiveX, but I need
to make sure both are up to date first.
If the Flash Detection Kit does not detect ActiveX does
anyone know where I can find code to do that?
Thanks,
Sharon

I use swfObject for Flash detection. It's easier to control
than the Adobe solution and allows you to provide plain html
alternate content:
http://blog.deconcept.com/swfobject/

Test Flash detection

Hello,
I got the flash detection kit and integrated it with a
website i am developing. Well a few people told me that they end up
with a blank page. I think that the flash detection did not work
and i am unable to check this part since all PCs at the office are
installed with the latest plugin.
How can i check if the detection is actually working ...
thanks
am

>> How can i check if the detection is actually working
>
> Uninstall the plugin.
Agreed. :) The most convenient way I can think of is to use
Alessandro
Crugnola's Flash Switcher extension for Firefox.
http://www.sephiroth.it/weblog/archives/2006/10/flash_switcher_for_firefox.php
> Also, you might want to use SWFObject - it's a lot
nicer:
>
http://blog.deconcept.com/swfobject/
Agreed again. Geoff Stearns even wrote a Dev Center article
on its use:
http://www.adobe.com/devnet/flash/articles/swfobject.html
David Stiller
Adobe Community Expert
Dev blog,
http://www.quip.net/blog/
"Luck is the residue of good design."

Flash Detection Kit - Express Install - Without Internet

Im interested in finding out if its possible to configure the Flash Detection Kit to download the plugins from a network-local location instead of the adobe site. Im working on a system that will be accessed in a closed network environment, and I need to have the plugins available in-house for machines that may not have them installed.
Does anyone have any advice on the best way of solving this?
thank you!

Anyone have any ideas?

Flash detection kit - How ?

Can i anyone give me the code to get the flash detection kit
to work, i just dont get it

JosBVG,
> Can i anyone give me the code to get the flash detection
> kit to work, i just dont get it
Unless there's a reason you need to use that particular
solution, I
recommend SWFObject. It's free, it's in wide use, and its
Google Code
website includes an AIR app that writes all the code for you.
You just fill
in a form of the SWF's name, width and height, etc., and the
thing generates
all the JavaScript code you need. Just copy and paste into
your HTML page.
http://code.google.com/p/swfobject/
There's also really good documentation here:
http://code.google.com/p/swfobject/wiki/documentation
David Stiller
Adobe Community Expert
Dev blog,
http://www.quip.net/blog/
"Luck is the residue of good design."

Adobe flash player 11 doesen't works on 10.8.1! what can i do? whats the best flash player for mac?

adobe flash player 11 doesen't works on 10.8.1! what can i do? whats the best flash player for mac?

First try deleting Flash Player by carefully following the instructions on Adobe's website:
http://helpx.adobe.com/flash-player/kb/uninstall-flash-player-mac-os.html
Then install it again from this location only:
http://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/

FLASH detection code chaos

I applied the massive code from my swf html into the index
page - but now I get TWO top banners and it also doesn't play the
alternate 'img src=indexalternate.jpg' when tested on a PC that
doesn't have Flash player 8 installed.
So my question is - which code do I remove (from what to
what) so the banner will appear once, not twice and why won't the
alternate content work? (tested on IE on a PC laptop which doesn't
have FLASH 8 player). Do I need to place the alternate content also
elsewhere? Have I placed the Flash detection javascript in the
wrong places?
http://www.enhancedwireless.net/index.html
Thanks much
KB

I dont know why people like you help people like us.
But, thank God for you -- youre one of the good guys.
here it is:
http://rccm.org/indexNEW27.shtml
It does work a little different than I hoped.
With the proper v. of Flash it works perfectly, w/o flash, it
says "click here to be re-routed"
Is there anyway to load:
http://rccm.org/assets/2007/global-alternative/xALT.html
automatically in the place of the swf, if there the user
doesnt have flash installed?
If not, I'll leave it as is. Great progress- I'm thrilled
thanks again,
Steven Galvano

Flash Detection Script

The Flash detection script generated by Flash 8 doesn't work
with IE7 .....andy fixes out there??

On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 17:48:49 +0000 (UTC), "joeq"
<[email protected]> wrote:
> let's say you have a page with that script and some
flash content on it as
>well... called scriptwithflash.html (catchy, eh?). i want
to be able to have
>that page load if the proper version of flash is found
and redirect to another
>page (ohcrapyoudonthaveflash.html) if it is isn't.
Okay. Now it makes sense. Change this:
if ( MM_FlashCanPlay ) {
window.location.replace("
http://www.leoandsabrina.com/main.html");
} else{
window.location.replace("
http://www.leoandsabrina.com/poop.html");
To this:
if ( !MM_FlashCanPlay ) {
window.location.replace("
http://www.leoandsabrina.com/ohcrapyoudonthaveflash.html");

Flash detection & express install

How does flash detection work and express install with the
new scripts dreamweaver creates for loading flash?

hi
I have done the flash detection script and it works for me
please refer these links
http://blog.deconcept.com/swfobject/#howitworks
http://www.adobe.com/devnet/flash/articles/swfobject.html
thanks

What is the best flash app for an S3 for streaming video?

What is the best flash app for an S3 for streaming video?

Flash Player 11, but you have to sideload if you lost it.
http://blogs.adobe.com/flashplayer/2012/06/flash-player-and-android-update.html
Adobe stopped support a while ago for it. They are replacing Flash Player with Air. WatchESPN for example uses Air.

Best flash detect to html

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for