Best option for file storage

I want to archive some of my CAD files and other files on a 'by year' basis. Is a flash drive a good option? They seem neat but then again they are a bit small & could get lost. Any ideas on the best option these days?

A 2.5" external hard drive will hold MUCH more and still fit in a shirt pocket should you choose. Lots of storage for a reasonable price. Remember to make backups of whatever meda you choose. You don't want your files to be in just one place.

Similar Messages

  • Best option for MBA storage capacity

    Hi all,
    Running around a number of options on which config of storage capacity to go for with a new MBA. Money is a bit tight so for that reason I'd prefer to go for the 128Gb SSD version but I know that will not be enough storage capacity for me.
    Therefore I'm mulling several solutions: USB storage, SDHC storage (on 13" model) or an external HDD via USB. Best VFM is obv an external hdd, but access times/running speeds (excuse the layman terms!) are ultimately my priority.
    I don't know much about what it's really like running extra storage permanently like I plan to - I assume it won't be as fast or glitch-free as internal storage would be, but I have no idea whether it'll be acceptable or awful. Example of use are prob running music/video files off it.
    I guess my question to you guys is, what kind of access expectations can I expect with the above options?
    Or, should I just take a deep breath and jump for the 256Gb version? Thanks in advance

    Right - yes, I've just been researching into SD Classes. Had no idea before!
    My ultimate aim is to have some extra storage that performs well enough at a low cost. Typical activity will probably be playing music and watching movies from the external media - what I'm worried about is poor data transfer speeds affecting playback etc. Can you advise on, for example, at what speed this would be a problem, and thus at what speeds I'd need? (sorry for all the questions!)
    If these problems are unlikely to happen with an SDHC, I would be tempted to go for it purely on the aesthetic grounds.
    Thanks again,

  • I purchased a  MBP 13.3/2.5/8GB/128GB FLASH from Apple store in Manhattan Beach,CA some months ago. It has only 128 GB storage. What us the best practical option for additional storage ?

    I purchased a  MBP 13.3/2.5/8GB/128GB FLASH from Apple store in Manhattan Beach,CA some months ago. It has only 128 GB storage.
    I soon realized that I did a big mistake not upgrading the storage when purchasing. I thought I could upgrade later which is not possible I understand.
    My Q:
    What is the best and most practical/userer friendly option for additional storage say up to 1 TB ?

    Hey leiv karsten,
    As your macbook is retina,you can't upgrade it like previous generation macbook pro.You can purchase a portable 1TB external harddrive.
    http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=lp_595048_nr_p_n_feature_two_brow_5?rh=n%3A172282%2C n%3A%21493964%2Cn%3A541966%2Cn%3A1292110011%2Cn%3A595048%2Cp_n_feature_two_brows e-bin%3A5446812011&bbn=595048&ie=UTF8&qid=1368944651&rnid=562234011

  • My home network has an Airport Extreme w/Time Capsule as the base and then an Airport Express and a second Airport Extreme to reach different areas of the house.  Is there a way to use the second Airport Extreme for file storage on this network?

    My home network has an Airport Extreme w/Time Capsule as the base and then an Airport Express and a second Airport Extreme to reach different areas of the house.  Is there a way to use the second Airport Extreme for file storage on this network?  Network is administered through an iMac running OS X Yosemite 10.10.2.  Ideally, would like for the second Airport Extreme hard drive to appear on the list of devices in the Finder window.

    Ok.. gottcha
    The problem is network wise.. Yosemite is about equal to tin cans and string.. pathetic.
    Here is my usual set of instructions to get anything working on Yosemite.
    The best way to fix problems is a full factory reset of all the AE in the network.
    Factory reset universal
    Power off the AE.. ie pull the power cord or power off at the wall.. wait 10sec.. hold in the reset button.. be gentle.. power on again still holding in reset.. and keep holding it in for another 10sec. You may need some help as it is hard to both hold in reset and apply power. It will show success by rapidly blinking the front led. Release the reset.. and wait a couple of min for the AE to reset and come back with factory settings. If the front LED doesn’t blink rapidly you missed it and simply try again. The reset is fairly fragile in these.. press it so you feel it just click and no more.. I have seen people bend the lever or even break it. I use a toothpick as tool.
    Then redo the setup from the computer with Yosemite.
    1. Use very short names.. NOT APPLE RECOMMENDED names. No spaces and pure alphanumerics.
    eg AEgen5 and AEwifi for basestation and wireless respectively.
    Even better if the issue is more wireless use AE24ghz and AE5ghz with fixed channels as this also seems to help stop the nonsense.
    2. Use all passwords that also comply but can be a bit longer. ie 8-20 characters mixed case and numbers.. no non-alphanumerics.
    3. Ensure the AE always takes the same IP address.. this is not a problem for AE which is router.. it is a problem for AE which is bridged.. you will need to set static IP in the main router by dhcp reservations or use static IP in the AE which is tricky.
    4. Check your share name on the computer is not changing.. make sure it also complies with the above.. short no spaces and pure alphanumeric..
    5. Make sure IPv6 is set to link-local only in the computer. For example wireless open the network preferences, wireless and advanced / TCP/IP.. and fix the IPv6. to link-local only.
    6. Now mount the disk of the second AE in finder... manually.
    Use Go, Connect to Server and type in the AE ip address.
    SMB://10.0.1.2
    Where you will replace that address with the actual address. The network resource should be discovered and then it will request the password.. type that in and make sure you tick to save it in your keychain.
    There is a lot more jiggery pokery you can try but the above is a good start.. if you find it still unreliable.. don't be surprised.
    Do as much as you want of the above... not all of it is necessary.. only if you want it reliable.. or as reliable as Yosemite in its current incarnation can manage.
    The most important thing is point 6.. mount the disk using direct IP address and not names.. dns in Yosemite is fatally flawed.
    See http://arstechnica.com/apple/2015/01/why-dns-in-os-x-10-10-is-broken-and-what-yo u-can-do-to-fix-it/

  • I do not have a delete option for files or folders in Adobe Creative Cloud

    I do not have a delete option for files or folders in Adobe Creative Cloud
    im looking and looking....
    im stumped.....
    4 weeks now....
    kai

    HOW TO DELETE FILES or FOLDERS or Assets from Adobe Creative Cloud Brouser/Web Portal By: Kai Buskirk rev:130626
    Adobe now burried deleting or trashing unwanted iteams files or folders in the Archive section of your creative cloud brouser/web portal.
    Note!! - No longeer is there a standard TrashCan icon or simple Delete button... its burried in the archive sector: but why i ask?
    An archive is an accumulation of historical records, or the physical place they are located.[1] Archives contain primary source documents that have accumulated over the course of an individual or organization's lifetime, and are kept to show the function of that person or organization. Professional archivists and historians generally understand archives to be records that have been naturally and necessarily generated as a product of regular legal, commercial, administrative or social activities.
    In general, archives consist of records that have been selected for permanent or long-term preservation on grounds of their enduring cultural, historical, or evidentiary value. Archival records are normally unpublished and almost always unique, unlike books or magazines for which many identical copies exist. This means that archives (the places) are quite distinct from libraries with regard to their functions and organization, although archival collections can often be found within library buildings
    A person who works in archives is called an archivist. The study and practice of organizing, preserving, and providing access to information and materials in archives is called archival science. The physical place of storage is sometimes referred to as an archive repository.
    To delete files folders or individual assests in the current incarnation of adobe creative cloud brouser/web portal rev:130626
    1 - Check mark the box on left and select files or folders you would like Deleted/Trashed and move them to the ARCHIVE folder location inside your adobe creative cloud brouser/web portal....Then navigate to the ARCHIVE SECTION
    2 - Once the files or folders you have check marked are moved to the ARCHIVE folder location you can select them for Permanant Deletion (Trash)
    ps: you can also restore them......if you so choose....
    3 - in case you missed this step after selecting/checking the files or folders in the ARCHIVE folder there is a small Triangle Selector drop down that will reviel the Permanently Delete option.... clicking that is the point of no return i think..... so do not be misled my the use of the term ARCHIVE.... DELETING PERMANANTLY IS DELETING YO!
    4 - OK DONE NOW YOU GOT IT .....
    Good Luck Happy House Cleaning.....
    Wamest Blessings,
    Kai Buskirk
    Message was edited by: [email protected] rev: 130626

  • Publish+Share best option for fast action AVI 1920x1080 29.97?

    I want to play my movie on an HDTV from my laptop or USB drive.  What is the best option for Publish+Share?
    I don't need to preserve layers for future re-edits and smaller file size is better but not if it's at the expense of playback quality. 
    Should I choose Computer or Disk?  Pros and cons?
    Should I choose MPEG or AVCHD?  Pros and cons?
    Which version of 1080?  Pros and cons?
    Is there a detailed listing of the Publish+Share options?

    Seems like there are 4 "best options" - can anyone advise further?
    SubCat
    Option
    File Type
    Frame Size
    Frame Rate
    Audio Setting
    MPEG
    MPEG2 1920 x 1080i 30
    MPEG2 Blu-ray
    1920 x 1080
    29.97
    Dolby Digital, 192 kbps, 48 kHz
    MPEG
    HDTV 1080p 29.97 High Quality
    MPEG2
    1920 x 1080
    29.97
    MPEG, 384 kbps, 48 kHz, 16 bit, Stereo
    AVCHD
    M2T - H.264 1920 x 1080i 30
    H.264 Blu-ray
    1920 x 1080
    29.97
    Dolby Digital, 192 kbps, 48 kHz
    AVCHD
    MP4 - H.264 1920 x 1080p 30
    H.264
    1920 x 1080
    29.97
    AAC, 160 kbps, 48 kHz, Stereo

  • Best Format for Additional Storage

    I've read a few threads on this issue, but none seem to provide the answers I need, so I'm starting a new one.
    I'm trying to make the best decision for additional storage for editing with FCP 4.5. I have a new project for a new customer that will require a significant amount of video storage while I am still doing my current projects (so I can't make room/stop what I'm doing, I'll be doing projects concurrently). This storage solution will just be a capture scratch disc.
    You can see below what I've got, system-wise. My current storage consists of 2 internal drives and 3 external fw800 drives. This setup has worked effectively for a number of years, but I'm now a little nervous (after reading some other posts on this subject) about adding another fw800 drive to the mix (such as the 1.2 TB Lacie Bigger disk).
    Here are my questions:
    1) Is the most reasonable (balancing price and performance) thing to do is add another fw800 drive? I have a PCI card with open fw800 ports.
    2) Are any ethernet solutions viable for working in FCP? If so, which ones? My current router is an old one but upgrading that to a gigabit option is reasonable if this will allow enough throughput for editing video from this storage solution.
    3) Is a SATA card, such as the Sonnet Tempo-X eSATA (http://www.sonnettech.com/product/tempo-x_esata8.html), a viable option?
    I'm gathering data at this point so any input is appreciated. Thanks in advance!

    Yea. The site is www.granitedigital.com if you didn't get that. I would probably go with them for heavy-lifting video jobs or go with Glyph (www.glyph.com) if you've got the means. They've got great flexible rackmount stuff in addition to enclosures. (They are, in the opinion of many, simply the best made external drives on the planet, used in almost every audio recording studio. You get what you pay for.) I would also check out G-technology. They all make great stuff; it's a matter of what fits your budget and needs based on what each company can offer you in terms of flexibility.
    Those notes being said I have had good experience with the LaCie drives I have encountered. I have an external CD-RW drive which is several years old and is still cranking out my CD masters for me without fail. I have a great deal of friends who use the D2 drives as well... they are solidly built (all metal) and use an Oxford chipset (I believe the more dated 922 but it's a decent chip) and like someone else said probably whatever batch of drives they can get cheapest. Inevitably, like any other drive, there are bound to be duds and drives that will fail prematurely. All things considered, in my experience they are workhorses and great "all-around" drives for doing whatever needs to be done in your everyday life.
    hope this helps,
    bret

  • Best options for uncompressed HD master?

    I've just finished my first feature-length project in HDV on FCP, and I have some questions about output. In the past I've always been editing SD DV under 60 mins, so master output was always easy. But between the HDV and the 90 min. run time, things are a little more complicated.
    We shot and edited in native HDV 1080/60i. We've rendered our final master sequence in HD ProRes, but I don't know where to go from here. These are my main questions:
    1. My primary distribution is going to be SD DVD, but I want to keep an uncompressed HD master file backed up on multiple hard drives. What's my best output option for such a file? Can I just export a self-contained QT in sequence settings? Will that apply compression I don't want? Is there a better output option in Compressor?
    2. Keep interlaced or deinterlace? Again, most people will be seeing this as an SD DVD.
    3. I'd also like to get a local video outfit to make an HD tape master for more secure long-term archiving. What tape format is recommended?
    4. Question I should have asked but didn't? Please, do tell.
    Thanks in advance for any help.
    Stu

    Ken Summerall, Jr. wrote:
    The absolute best quality that you are going to get is by exporting a QT movie using current settings and making it self contained. Since you shot and edited in an HDV sequence this will add no further compression (remember that HDV is already heavily compressed).
    Uh-oh. That's not actually correct.
    HDV is relatively unusual as shooting formats go, in that it's a GOP format, as opposed to an I-frame format. In I-frame formats, each frame of footage (or pair of fields, if you're shooting interlaced) is compressed all by itself, independently of all other frames (or field-pairs). But in a GOP format, a number of frames are compressed together — that's what "GOP" means: "group of pictures." The first frame is compressed independently, then the next frame is described in terms of what's different from the previous frame.
    When you edit HDV +and then export it as HDV again,+ whether to videotape or to a Quicktime, the GOPs must be "conformed." As you edit, you make cuts that break the GOP structure, so the timeline cuts from the middle of one GOP to the middle of another without including the first frame on which that second GOP depends. So when you export or lay off, Final Cut has to go through and convert a bunch of I-frames to B- or P-frames, and convert a bunch of B- or P-frames to I-frames.
    In essence, exporting or laying off HDV imposes a compression hit. You will reduce the quality of your footage.
    Since the question was about the best option for mastering, HDV is +definitely not it.+ Would it be okay? That depends on the footage, and on how picky you are. But it's not the best option. The best option is to master to a (ha ha) mastering format. Uncompressed 8-bit, Uncompressed 10-bit and ProRes are good choices here.
    As for tape … that's tougher. You can absolutely send an uncompressed or ProRes Quicktime file to a dubbing house and get it laid off to videotape, but the question is to what format? HDV is a poor choice, because of the aforementioned compression hit you take when conforming the GOPs. DVCPRO HD would actually be a step down for you, because it would downsample your 1440x1080 native footage (or your 1920x1080 master, if you chose to upres) to 1280x1080.
    That leaves HDCAM and HDCAM SR. If you've done things like color correction or compositing in a 10-bit color space — or even long-slow dissolves to or from black, which is one of the places where 8-bit really falls apart on you — choose HDCAM SR. HDCAM is an 8-bit format only, and you'll lose color precision if you go to that format. But if you stayed 8-bit all the way through your workflow, then you can go to HDCAM without any real problems.
    Note that both HDCAM and HDCAM SR +are compressed formats.+ Your only option for uncompressed HD videotape is D6, and good luck finding a Voodoo recorder nearby. But HDCAM and SR are good enough for professional mastering, so they'll surely be good enough for you as well. And they're both available in 94- and 124-minute lengths, so you can master your whole feature on a single tape.
    (While you're at it, consider getting your uncompressed or ProRes master file dubbed off to a data tape format as well. You worked really hard on this project, so it makes sense to be a little paranoid about preserving the fruit of your labors.)

  • Best option for Asynchronous method invocation? JMS or Pure Java Thread

    Hi,
    We've a swing based Client application which is supposed to run with a server in J2EE environment. Some process like Search etc are very time consuming. So we are going for asynchronous process.
    Now the question is to find a best option for this. Two possible candidates are
    1. JMS
    2. Java Thread.
    Can anybody suggest me which one is the best option in this context?

    Actually my thought was the issues with code maintainability.Maintainability is different issue, it is much related to OOAD and design pattern you might want to choose to avoid coupling (thus high reusability and maintainability - eg: for future enhancement, etc)..
    public interface SearchService {
         public static class DefaultFactory {
                 public SearchService getInstance() {
                          return HttpSearchService.getInstance();
         public void search (String[] keywords, Observer obs);
    public class HttpSearchService implements SearchService {
         public static HttpSearchService getInstance() {
                ... bla bla bla singleton ...
         public void search(final String [] keywords, final Observer obs) {
                     (new Thread() {
                              public void run() {
                                    .. do http request ...
                                    List result =  ... parse http response ...
                                    obs.update(list);
                     }).start();
    SearchService ss = SearchService.DefaultFactory.getInstance();
    ss.search( new String[] { "get", "me", "my" , "dukes" }, myTableModel );
    ...You can, in future, replace the default factory HttpSearchService with something faster, more appropriate SearchService, without changing many codes.
    rgds,
    Alex

  • What is the best option for tethering my IPhone 4s with my iPad? (the iPad is wifi only)

    What is the best option for tethering my IPhone 4s with my iPad? (the iPad is wifi only)

    #1. Understand that if you switch carriers, you can NOT take your existing iPhone with you. It won't work. You will need to purchase a new one.
    #2. Your only choices are Sprint and Verizon. Decide who has the better coverage in your area. Keep in mind that you will NOT be able to get simultaneous voice and 3G data on either of these, as their CDMA networks do not support it. The U.S. T-Mobile network is not supported and is not fully compatible with the iPhone as it operates on a rarely used frequency compared to the rest of the world.
    #3. What in the world are "niners"? Do you mean you want to be able to keep your existing "phone numbers"? If so, that should be no problem. Most numbers in the US are now portable.
    #4. Consider WHY you want to switch. If the issue is really price, you're not going to see much of a difference. A few dollars a month at best for comparable voice and data plans.

  • Best solution for media storage

    Hi Everyone,
    I am looking for suggestions/how-to on the best setup for media storage. We have two editors (and two computers - Mac Pro PowerPC and iMac Intel). We are currently using an internal 500 GB slot on the Mac Pro along with 1 additional external 1.5 TB drive. Then, on our iMac we use a 1.5 TB external drive. We use, for external drives, LaCie.
    Here's our problem. We are running out of space. So, what is the best solution for media storage? Should we get a small rack for our external drives from LaCie and daisy chain them? Or, should we get a server? The only problem I have with a server is connection speed...we, most of the time, have a slow connection at our college.
    p.s. here is a link to LaCie's website listing a rack...and we have the d2 drives. So, do you daisy chain them or plug each one in individually?
    http://www.lacie.com/us/products/product.htm?pid=10172
    Any ideas/thoughts/suggestions are greatly appreciated!!
    Thanks in advance.
    zanm
    Message was edited by: zanfardinom

    Hi Everyone!
    Thank you all for your suggestions. I agree...Drobo looks great, but I am finding more and more bad news when it comes to editing. It looks like a great solution for archiving. I received another solution with great reviews from one of my colleagues contacts. They work for a big company.
    Hope this helps...something else to add to the mix.
    *Our edit suite storage solution is a Facilis Terrablock 24EX unit. (http://www.facilis2.com/24ex.html) It has 18TB of space and is connected on 4GB Fibre channel to both suites. On top of that we have an Apple X-Serve running Final Cut Server that sorts and catalogs all the video we put in so network users (Mac and PC) can search and look at media from their workstations. We just put this in a few months ago. Before that we had a Rorke Data Galaxy HDX with 6TB of space on a 2GB Fibre Channel connection. ( http://www.rorke.com/av/galaxy-hdx.cfm ) It’s now a backup storage unit. Both systems have excellent performance though, we upgraded mostly for space and the server software.*
    Again, thank you all for your help. I will research all suggestions.

  • Whats the best option for passing parameters between tf?

    Dear All,
    I have three Task Flows:
    1. TF1
         -  Main Taskflow that calls a web service to gather its data
    2. TF2
         -  Secondary taskflow which receives a parameter and depending on the value of the parameter received will display its data accordingly.  Generally any data
         is feed from TF1
    3. TF3
         -  Same as TF2Use Case:
    All three TF will be dropped to the page as Regions in a Webcenter Portal Application. Changes in TF1 should propagate into TaskFlow 2.
    Question:
    1. How do I configure that changes in TF1 would be propagated back into task flow 2 and 3 and whats the best option for this?
    2. At runtime, user can choose to edit the page and TF2 and TF3 can be deleted but TF 1 should remain as the source of information.
    Given the scenario above:
    - shall I wire the taskflows via page parameters?
    - contextual events?
    What are the considerations that needs to be thought of. I havent done such requirements before.
    Please help.
    Webcenter 11.1.1.6

    Contextual events seem to be the best case.
    This way you can trigger whenever you want. Web services can be slow so you can trigger the event when the gathering of the data has been finished and then pass some value on the event.
    An event also has a payload so it's an ideal scenario to add the data from the service on it so you can use it in the other TF's.
    In order to manage the deletion of the TF1, you can use the UI events on the composer: http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E23943_01/webcenter.1111/e10148/jpsdg_page_editor_adv.htm#CHDHHFDJ

  • Best option for upgrading to CS 6

    Hello,
    I need some help. I currently have CS 5 and 5.5 installed across 7 PCs and 1 MAC within the marketing department in my company. What would be the best option for upgrading all of them to CS 6 Master Collection. (how many PCs can I use a license on? How many licenses would I have to purchase to install on all the machines?)
    Thanks.

    There is no ambiguity here: You buy 7+1 licenses. Though you have 2 activations per license, they are not meant to run your facility on the cheap. I suggest you read the EULA....
    Mylenium

  • Best option for optical au

    Hey guys,
    just a query - i have an audigy 2 ZS currently, and a high end yamaha 7. amplifier.
    what im wanting to do is connect this up via optical .. its currently connected via RCA and it seems to get confused as to which is the sub and which is the centre, despite me trying all combinations of cabling.
    so i thought an optical wire from soundcard to amplifier would be the best way ?
    i've read somewhere that if i do this, and play 2. audio (mp3s), my rear channel will be disabled ? surely thats not true ? - reason for saying this is i've seen home theatre setups where a CD player is hooked up to an amp via optical, and it still produces audio through the rear channels.
    whats the best option to run this via optical ? do i need to purchase a new sound card ? if so, what is the best option for me ?
    id rather quality than cheaping out on something that 'will do the job', but options are always welcome
    mostly i listen to music with a bit of bass, i dont do a whole heap of gaming, so i guess music is the focus.
    Thanks !

    ReaperZ,
    The center is on the nominally-left-channel RCA, so the likely-red-coded, nominally-right-channel RCA is your subwoofer connector.
    I don't have the same soundcard model, and I can't give you blow-by-blow detail, but try looking in the Bass Management tab of the Speaker Settings control, or you may find something in the THX Setup Console, for bass redirection. You should at least find subwoofer volume and crossover-frequency sliders, and you also might find a center volume control. I'm a proponent of running all soundcard volumes at 00% and controlling listening volume and speaker balance at the amp, since this maximizes the digital SNR, but it can also be less convenient.
    Run through the receiver manual's troubleshooting section for "No sound from the center speaker" and "No sound from the subwoofer" just to rule out a setting problem on the receiver side.
    Then use "Manually adjusting speaker levels" on pg 45 of the receiver manual, with? MULTI CH IN selected on the remote control, to max the SWFR level (+0dB). Most receivers have separate level settings for their multi-channel input, so it is usually advantageous to provide the +0dB boost this way so it is in effect only when using the soundcard. This boost can be increased further by lowering all of the other settings the same number of dB's: if you subtract dB from all of the others, the effect is to increase the relati've subwoofer volume by dB.
    Try using this information and let us know what happens.
    -Dave
    ?[email protected]

  • Best option for replacing a faulty ATI Radeon x 2600 XT 256mb

    My graphics card has just packed up, and I am struggling to find anybody at the Apple Technical Support service to give me a straight answer.
    I am not a gamer, and only require a card that will allow me day today use and for general camcorder editing (novice level).
    I had an ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT - standard install. in my MacPro (early 2008) 2.8Ghz, Dual Quad Intel chipset, OSX 10.6 (snow leopard).
    Can anyone recommend the best option for ATI card, as I have read theyh perform better than the Nvidia cards.

    I'd get ATI HD Radeon 4870 Mac Edition from Apple.
    The GT is more like spare or for 3 monitors. Why or how Nvidia got that card to be adopted as the OEM standard in a workstation, and not say GTS/GTX 200 series is, beyond me. One year ATI, next year Nvidia gets the "prize" seems to be the order of the day.
    Nvidia drivers have been a problem for Apple for years, the GTX 285 would do some serious damage to 3D and CS4/5. Two dual width card design the way a Quadro CX handles CS4 for Windows to do realtime image rendering instantly.
    I wouldn't flash unless you like to dabble or want to learn. In which case a 1GB card would make more sense.
    Surprised though the manager didn't steer you toward the 4870.

Maybe you are looking for