Best option for more HD space?

Greetings everyone. My Macbook Pro's 120 GB drive just isn't cutting it anymore, especially when it's split between OSX and XP. My XP side isn't enough for even a fraction of my games to be installed, and OSX is feeling the pain of less and less memory, greatly affecting my performance. I need to upgrade, but I don't know the best way to go about it- should I upgrade the internal, or should I buy an external and hook it up with firewire?
I'm concerned about:
-Running games off of an external drive. Will firewire be fast enough to play my high end games like Crysis and Spore? Will Valve's Steam program run properly?
-Voiding my warranty. I read that upgrading the internal drive will void my warrenty. Will it void my Applecare as well? Voiding my warranty is out of the question for me, as my MBP already died on me once in my first year and a half with it.
-Saving money. I'm an art student. You get the idea.
So, what's the best way to go about this upgrade? External, or internal? I'm pretty much in the dark here. Thanks in advance for any advice.
-Rmcglynn

Will firewire be fast enough to play my high end games like Crysis and Spore? Will Valve's Steam program run properly?
Probably not. Although that would depend on the display settings you set for the game.
Will it void my Applecare as well?
Yes...AppleCare is your warranty.
what's the best way to go about this upgrade?
Have an Apple Authorized Service Provider isntall an internal drive so as to not void the warranty.

Similar Messages

New MBP--options for more HD space

Hello,
I am the new (and happy) owner of a 17" MBP. I successfully transferred all of my files to the MBP, which has left my MBP HD with 33 gb. I would like to store my photos and music on another HD to free up space. I have a 800mHz g4 QS with 60 and 120gb ata HDs. Should I set up the G4 a server and store my photos and music on the 120gb HD or is it better to remove the HD and use it as an external drive (in a firewire enclosure)? Any other suggestions would be appreciated. Thanks.
PS. How would I set up the g4 as a server? Would this set up work?
powermac g4 800mHz Mac OS X (10.4.7)

Considering the reliability of external drives for anything other than backups and temporary storage, I'd increase your internal hard drive size (which can be done up to 160 GB with a good Western Digital or Seagate 2.5" SATA drive), and use external hard drives for backup as my FAQ explains:
http://www.macmaps.com/backup.html
While the G4 can be setup as a server, it would not be an easy to recover solution as a clone, and does not have the same hard drive formatting to act as a clone. You could put your tunes and photos on the G4, and back that up separately, and simply setup your G4 to share the tunes and photos over the network. If you have airport or a local area network with a router this can be done if both machines are running the same iPhoto and iTunes.

Best options for uncompressed HD master?

I've just finished my first feature-length project in HDV on FCP, and I have some questions about output. In the past I've always been editing SD DV under 60 mins, so master output was always easy. But between the HDV and the 90 min. run time, things are a little more complicated.
We shot and edited in native HDV 1080/60i. We've rendered our final master sequence in HD ProRes, but I don't know where to go from here. These are my main questions:
1. My primary distribution is going to be SD DVD, but I want to keep an uncompressed HD master file backed up on multiple hard drives. What's my best output option for such a file? Can I just export a self-contained QT in sequence settings? Will that apply compression I don't want? Is there a better output option in Compressor?
2. Keep interlaced or deinterlace? Again, most people will be seeing this as an SD DVD.
3. I'd also like to get a local video outfit to make an HD tape master for more secure long-term archiving. What tape format is recommended?
4. Question I should have asked but didn't? Please, do tell.
Thanks in advance for any help.
Stu

Ken Summerall, Jr. wrote:
The absolute best quality that you are going to get is by exporting a QT movie using current settings and making it self contained. Since you shot and edited in an HDV sequence this will add no further compression (remember that HDV is already heavily compressed).
Uh-oh. That's not actually correct.
HDV is relatively unusual as shooting formats go, in that it's a GOP format, as opposed to an I-frame format. In I-frame formats, each frame of footage (or pair of fields, if you're shooting interlaced) is compressed all by itself, independently of all other frames (or field-pairs). But in a GOP format, a number of frames are compressed together — that's what "GOP" means: "group of pictures." The first frame is compressed independently, then the next frame is described in terms of what's different from the previous frame.
When you edit HDV +and then export it as HDV again,+ whether to videotape or to a Quicktime, the GOPs must be "conformed." As you edit, you make cuts that break the GOP structure, so the timeline cuts from the middle of one GOP to the middle of another without including the first frame on which that second GOP depends. So when you export or lay off, Final Cut has to go through and convert a bunch of I-frames to B- or P-frames, and convert a bunch of B- or P-frames to I-frames.
In essence, exporting or laying off HDV imposes a compression hit. You will reduce the quality of your footage.
Since the question was about the best option for mastering, HDV is +definitely not it.+ Would it be okay? That depends on the footage, and on how picky you are. But it's not the best option. The best option is to master to a (ha ha) mastering format. Uncompressed 8-bit, Uncompressed 10-bit and ProRes are good choices here.
As for tape … that's tougher. You can absolutely send an uncompressed or ProRes Quicktime file to a dubbing house and get it laid off to videotape, but the question is to what format? HDV is a poor choice, because of the aforementioned compression hit you take when conforming the GOPs. DVCPRO HD would actually be a step down for you, because it would downsample your 1440x1080 native footage (or your 1920x1080 master, if you chose to upres) to 1280x1080.
That leaves HDCAM and HDCAM SR. If you've done things like color correction or compositing in a 10-bit color space — or even long-slow dissolves to or from black, which is one of the places where 8-bit really falls apart on you — choose HDCAM SR. HDCAM is an 8-bit format only, and you'll lose color precision if you go to that format. But if you stayed 8-bit all the way through your workflow, then you can go to HDCAM without any real problems.
Note that both HDCAM and HDCAM SR +are compressed formats.+ Your only option for uncompressed HD videotape is D6, and good luck finding a Voodoo recorder nearby. But HDCAM and SR are good enough for professional mastering, so they'll surely be good enough for you as well. And they're both available in 94- and 124-minute lengths, so you can master your whole feature on a single tape.
(While you're at it, consider getting your uncompressed or ProRes master file dubbed off to a data tape format as well. You worked really hard on this project, so it makes sense to be a little paranoid about preserving the fruit of your labors.)

Best option for Asynchronous method invocation? JMS or Pure Java Thread

Hi,
We've a swing based Client application which is supposed to run with a server in J2EE environment. Some process like Search etc are very time consuming. So we are going for asynchronous process.
Now the question is to find a best option for this. Two possible candidates are
1. JMS
2. Java Thread.
Can anybody suggest me which one is the best option in this context?

Actually my thought was the issues with code maintainability.Maintainability is different issue, it is much related to OOAD and design pattern you might want to choose to avoid coupling (thus high reusability and maintainability - eg: for future enhancement, etc)..
public interface SearchService {
     public static class DefaultFactory {
             public SearchService getInstance() {
                      return HttpSearchService.getInstance();
     public void search (String[] keywords, Observer obs);
public class HttpSearchService implements SearchService {
     public static HttpSearchService getInstance() {
            ... bla bla bla singleton ...
     public void search(final String [] keywords, final Observer obs) {
                 (new Thread() {
                          public void run() {
                                .. do http request ...
                                List result = ... parse http response ...
                                obs.update(list);
                 }).start();
SearchService ss = SearchService.DefaultFactory.getInstance();
ss.search( new String[] { "get", "me", "my" , "dukes" }, myTableModel );
...You can, in future, replace the default factory HttpSearchService with something faster, more appropriate SearchService, without changing many codes.
rgds,
Alex

Best option for replacing a faulty ATI Radeon x 2600 XT 256mb

My graphics card has just packed up, and I am struggling to find anybody at the Apple Technical Support service to give me a straight answer.
I am not a gamer, and only require a card that will allow me day today use and for general camcorder editing (novice level).
I had an ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT - standard install. in my MacPro (early 2008) 2.8Ghz, Dual Quad Intel chipset, OSX 10.6 (snow leopard).
Can anyone recommend the best option for ATI card, as I have read theyh perform better than the Nvidia cards.

I'd get ATI HD Radeon 4870 Mac Edition from Apple.
The GT is more like spare or for 3 monitors. Why or how Nvidia got that card to be adopted as the OEM standard in a workstation, and not say GTS/GTX 200 series is, beyond me. One year ATI, next year Nvidia gets the "prize" seems to be the order of the day.
Nvidia drivers have been a problem for Apple for years, the GTX 285 would do some serious damage to 3D and CS4/5. Two dual width card design the way a Quadro CX handles CS4 for Windows to do realtime image rendering instantly.
I wouldn't flash unless you like to dabble or want to learn. In which case a 1GB card would make more sense.
Surprised though the manager didn't steer you toward the 4870.

Best option for remote downlinking

I am going to be streaming video/audio to some clients all over the US, all of which will be using PC's.
90% of the time they are going to be in locations where a hardline to the internet isn't possible.
What is the best option for them to access my stream as well as provide me back a webcam feed?
Is a cell phone card as good as it gets now?
Thanks,
Chris

Your options here are entirely and completely dependent on the local network services. This could include cellular data packet networks (and there are various flavors), WISP, satellite data (Iridium, GlobalStar and such), dial-up at speeds anywhere from roughly 50 kilobaud down to unusable, local WiFi networks, or otherwise.
Satellite networks are the most pervasive, though do have technical limits and do have among the highest of the high prices. I'd not want to stream video (on a budget) on such networks.
If these clients are going to be located are fixed sites or specific geographic areas, you can potentially set up backhaul wireless networks. If local network coverage is bad (and the local terrain allows it), you can potentially set up your own WISP, and provide coverage for yourself and potentially others.
If this is the United States, you're going to encounter some rather severe limitations and network fragmentation outside the metropolitan areas. Inside the metropolitan areas, there are almost always options. Outside those areas, you'll find that some countries will tend to have more pervasive network services, and better wireless coverage. (DSL and cellular data coverage is very far from pervasive locally, and this is located in one of the most populous counties in a small US state. And the local geography is not particularly amenable to a WISP operating on a budget.)

What is the best option for tethering my IPhone 4s with my iPad? (the iPad is wifi only)

What is the best option for tethering my IPhone 4s with my iPad? (the iPad is wifi only)

#1. Understand that if you switch carriers, you can NOT take your existing iPhone with you. It won't work. You will need to purchase a new one.
#2. Your only choices are Sprint and Verizon. Decide who has the better coverage in your area. Keep in mind that you will NOT be able to get simultaneous voice and 3G data on either of these, as their CDMA networks do not support it. The U.S. T-Mobile network is not supported and is not fully compatible with the iPhone as it operates on a rarely used frequency compared to the rest of the world.
#3. What in the world are "niners"? Do you mean you want to be able to keep your existing "phone numbers"? If so, that should be no problem. Most numbers in the US are now portable.
#4. Consider WHY you want to switch. If the issue is really price, you're not going to see much of a difference. A few dollars a month at best for comparable voice and data plans.

Publish+Share best option for fast action AVI 1920x1080 29.97?

I want to play my movie on an HDTV from my laptop or USB drive. What is the best option for Publish+Share?
I don't need to preserve layers for future re-edits and smaller file size is better but not if it's at the expense of playback quality.
Should I choose Computer or Disk? Pros and cons?
Should I choose MPEG or AVCHD? Pros and cons?
Which version of 1080? Pros and cons?
Is there a detailed listing of the Publish+Share options?

Seems like there are 4 "best options" - can anyone advise further?
SubCat
Option
File Type
Frame Size
Frame Rate
Audio Setting
MPEG
MPEG2 1920 x 1080i 30
MPEG2 Blu-ray
1920 x 1080
29.97
Dolby Digital, 192 kbps, 48 kHz
MPEG
HDTV 1080p 29.97 High Quality
MPEG2
1920 x 1080
29.97
MPEG, 384 kbps, 48 kHz, 16 bit, Stereo
AVCHD
M2T - H.264 1920 x 1080i 30
H.264 Blu-ray
1920 x 1080
29.97
Dolby Digital, 192 kbps, 48 kHz
AVCHD
MP4 - H.264 1920 x 1080p 30
H.264
1920 x 1080
29.97
AAC, 160 kbps, 48 kHz, Stereo

Whats the best option for passing parameters between tf?

Dear All,
I have three Task Flows:
1. TF1
     - Main Taskflow that calls a web service to gather its data
2. TF2
     - Secondary taskflow which receives a parameter and depending on the value of the parameter received will display its data accordingly. Generally any data
     is feed from TF1
3. TF3
     - Same as TF2Use Case:
All three TF will be dropped to the page as Regions in a Webcenter Portal Application. Changes in TF1 should propagate into TaskFlow 2.
Question:
1. How do I configure that changes in TF1 would be propagated back into task flow 2 and 3 and whats the best option for this?
2. At runtime, user can choose to edit the page and TF2 and TF3 can be deleted but TF 1 should remain as the source of information.
Given the scenario above:
- shall I wire the taskflows via page parameters?
- contextual events?
What are the considerations that needs to be thought of. I havent done such requirements before.
Please help.
Webcenter 11.1.1.6

Contextual events seem to be the best case.
This way you can trigger whenever you want. Web services can be slow so you can trigger the event when the gathering of the data has been finished and then pass some value on the event.
An event also has a payload so it's an ideal scenario to add the data from the service on it so you can use it in the other TF's.
In order to manage the deletion of the TF1, you can use the UI events on the composer: http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E23943_01/webcenter.1111/e10148/jpsdg_page_editor_adv.htm#CHDHHFDJ

Best option for upgrading to CS 6

Hello,
I need some help. I currently have CS 5 and 5.5 installed across 7 PCs and 1 MAC within the marketing department in my company. What would be the best option for upgrading all of them to CS 6 Master Collection. (how many PCs can I use a license on? How many licenses would I have to purchase to install on all the machines?)
Thanks.

There is no ambiguity here: You buy 7+1 licenses. Though you have 2 activations per license, they are not meant to run your facility on the cheap. I suggest you read the EULA....
Mylenium

Best option for optical au

Hey guys,
just a query - i have an audigy 2 ZS currently, and a high end yamaha 7. amplifier.
what im wanting to do is connect this up via optical .. its currently connected via RCA and it seems to get confused as to which is the sub and which is the centre, despite me trying all combinations of cabling.
so i thought an optical wire from soundcard to amplifier would be the best way ?
i've read somewhere that if i do this, and play 2. audio (mp3s), my rear channel will be disabled ? surely thats not true ? - reason for saying this is i've seen home theatre setups where a CD player is hooked up to an amp via optical, and it still produces audio through the rear channels.
whats the best option to run this via optical ? do i need to purchase a new sound card ? if so, what is the best option for me ?
id rather quality than cheaping out on something that 'will do the job', but options are always welcome
mostly i listen to music with a bit of bass, i dont do a whole heap of gaming, so i guess music is the focus.
Thanks !

ReaperZ,
The center is on the nominally-left-channel RCA, so the likely-red-coded, nominally-right-channel RCA is your subwoofer connector.
I don't have the same soundcard model, and I can't give you blow-by-blow detail, but try looking in the Bass Management tab of the Speaker Settings control, or you may find something in the THX Setup Console, for bass redirection. You should at least find subwoofer volume and crossover-frequency sliders, and you also might find a center volume control. I'm a proponent of running all soundcard volumes at 00% and controlling listening volume and speaker balance at the amp, since this maximizes the digital SNR, but it can also be less convenient.
Run through the receiver manual's troubleshooting section for "No sound from the center speaker" and "No sound from the subwoofer" just to rule out a setting problem on the receiver side.
Then use "Manually adjusting speaker levels" on pg 45 of the receiver manual, with? MULTI CH IN selected on the remote control, to max the SWFR level (+0dB). Most receivers have separate level settings for their multi-channel input, so it is usually advantageous to provide the +0dB boost this way so it is in effect only when using the soundcard. This boost can be increased further by lowering all of the other settings the same number of dB's: if you subtract dB from all of the others, the effect is to increase the relati've subwoofer volume by dB.
Try using this information and let us know what happens.
-Dave
?[email protected]

Best option for boosting signal

Hi all,
For internet access I plug my mac directly in to my Time Capsule and then use my touch wirelessly throughout the house.
I lose signal strength toward the back of the house and sometimes lose the signal completely.
What is my best option for boosting the signal coming from the Time Capsule.
Oh, I have an old Airport Express Base Station if this can be used.
Cheers,
Steve

cheers for the info.
How can I tell if my Airport Express Base Station is using N wireless?
Is the G version just an older, slower version?
Cheers,
Steve

Best option for protecting the palm wrest area from staining?

My new white MacBook is scheduled to be delivered tomorrow. I currently use a blackbook. Anyway, I have kind of oily skin, and I'm worried about staining on the white plastic on the new computer where my palms rest during use.
What's the best option for protecting this area? I've seen the Marware protection pack, but I've read quite a few bad reviews on it.
Any ideas?
Thanks!
Dave

I use Mareware's product on my WhiteBook and it is sold at the Apple Store and Apple online. It also comes with a keyboard cover cloth to put on when the Book is closed to protect the screen. The cloth doubles as a soft wipe for the screen. The palm rest is custom fitted for the palm area and is removable. I have removed it twice and stuck it back on. Here's a link: http://store.apple.com/1-800-MY-APPLE/WebObjects/AppleStore.woa/wa/RSLID?mco=A75 86758&nplm=TJ751LL/A

Best option for video conferencing in ios app ?

I want to implement video conferencing in ios app. what is the best option for this?

There are several: Fuze, Webex, are a few. These two also have desktop components. Try looking in the app store and googling to see if you can also find reviews/suggestions and other options on the web.

Best option for a 'sim free' phone in the UK

Can anyone recommend a best option for getting a 'carrier free' 3GS for use with the Orange network in the UK?
Anyone out there who has bought one from a suitable 'sim free' country can give me any recommendations?
Thanks!

gadgetman2000 wrote:
Thanks for the comments above.
Why would a warranty not apply just because the phone ends up in a different country? If an Apple product is defective, then surely they have a legal responsibility to put the product right. It would be interesting to see how it stood up in a court of law. As consumers we all have rights regardless of what any manufacturer puts in their warranty information. In the UK the Sale of Goods Act means you are covered for up to six years if a product is defective because of an 'inherent fault' no matter what the manufacturer says.
Not true. I used to work for a company down in Berkshire. One of their products bought through official channels over here was covered.
Try buying one in the states because it was cheaper tho, and you'd suddenly find you had no warranty.
The Sale of goods Act is UK law not international law. It might apply to products bought somewhere in the EU but it wouldn't be worth the paper it was written on in the US.

Best option for more HD space?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for