Best practice for implementing Manufacturing Cost Planning ( MCP)

is there any best practice for implementing Manufacturing Cost Planning ( MCP) using BI-IP?

Hi:
Both options are viable. If you reverse posting in FB50 then FI GL account postings will also be reversed and along with cost center postings. Hence here advantage is that cost center reversal will be with referenced to the original document with which wrong posting were made. Disadvantage here is that you will to post the entry again in FB50 . In KB11N you will simply transfer cost center amount from wrong to new one that should be in place of it but here you will have no reference . I personally think reversing posting through FB50 is viable options , reverse postings can be seen in KSB1 as well against that cost center.
Regards

Similar Messages

SAP Best Practice for Discrete Manufacturing

Hi colleagues,
We are installing SAP BP for Discrete Manufacturing based on ECC 6.00. We have already installed the Baseline Layer 0. The problem we face now is that some of the building blocks required for Layer1 activation are not present amongst the ones already installed.
How does one get these missing building blocks?
Thank you.

Dear,
For detail information please refer the OSS notes,
1040010 and 1223033 - SAP Best Practices for Discrete Manufacturing V1.603 CN
Ensure that exactly the support package levels mentioned in the Quick Guide are implemented (not below and NOT HIGHER).
Regards,
R.rahmankar

The SAP Best Practices for Discrete Manufacturing V1.603

Hai All,
We are implementing SAP A1 for manufacturing company, so We selected SAP Best Practices for Discrete Manufacturing V1.603. Hear my question is after ecc 6.0 installation what level i need to update the patches, because if i update all patches(up to date) it will give problem while building block updating.
Thanks in Advance...
Sushma Tatineni

Dear,
For detail information please refer the OSS notes,
1040010 and 1223033 - SAP Best Practices for Discrete Manufacturing V1.603 CN
Ensure that exactly the support package levels mentioned in the Quick Guide are implemented (not below and NOT HIGHER).
Regards,
R.rahmankar

SAP Best Practices for Discrete Manufacturing

Hai All,
We are implementing SAP A1 for manufacturing company, so We selected SAP Best Practices for Discrete Manufacturing V1.603. Hear my question is after ecc 6.0 installation what level i need to update the patches, because if i update all patches(up to date) it will give problem while building block updating.
Thanks in Advance...
Sushma Tatineni

Dear,
For detail information please refer the OSS notes,
1040010 and 1223033 - SAP Best Practices for Discrete Manufacturing V1.603 CN
Ensure that exactly the support package levels mentioned in the Quick Guide are implemented (not below and NOT HIGHER).
Regards,
R.rahmankar

Best practices for using the 'cost details' fields

Hi
Please could you advise us to the best practices for using the 'cost details' field within Pricing. Currently I cannot find the way to surface the individual Cost Details fields within the Next Generation UI, even with the tick box for 'display both cost and price' ticked. It seems that these get surfaced when the Next Generation UI is turned off, but cannot find them when it is turned on. We can see the 'Pricing Summary' field but this does not fulfill our needs, as some of our services have both recurring and one-off costs.
Attached are some screenshots to further explain the situation.
Many thanks,
Richard Thornton

Hi Richard,
If you need to configure dynamic pricing that may vary by tenant and/or if you want to set up cost drivers that are service item attributes, you should configure Billing Tables in the Demand Management module in 10.0.
The cost detail functionality in 9.4 will likely be changed to merged with the new pricing feature in 10.0. The current plan is not to bring cost detail into the Service Catalog module.

Best Practices for Implementing Cryptographic VPN

With Marcin Latosiewicz
Welcome to the Cisco Support Community Ask the Expert conversation. This is an opportunity to learn and ask questions about implementing cryptographic VPN and how to prepare it for the future with expert Marcin Latosiewicz.
Marcin will share his best practices for implementing cryptographic VPN as well as advise those customers who are looking to build a new or update their existing setups how to maximize their potential. Additionally, Marcin will provide insight into which technologies could be applicable for new deployments and exciting new technologies that will be available in the next few months.
Marcin Latosiewicz is a customer support engineer at the Cisco® Technical Assistance Center in Belgium, with more than 6 years of experience with Cisco Security products and technologies including IPsec, VPN, internetworking appliances, network and system security, Internet services, and Cisco networking equipment. Prior to joining Cisco, he operated, administered, and ran UNIX and Microsoft networks for 14 years. Latosiewicz holds bachelors and masters degrees in engineering from Warsaw University of Technology. He also holds CCIE® certification in Security (No. 25784) and CCDP® certification.
Remember to use the rating system to let Marcin know if you've received an adequate response.
Because of the volume expected during this event, Marcin might not be able to answer every question. Remember that you can continue the conversation in the Security community, subcommunity, VPN, shortly after the event. This event lasts through September 20, 2013. Visit this forum often to view responses to your questions and those of other Cisco Support Community members.

Jouni,
Good question. And answer is complex, there is in depth and there is in depth.
Most people would be satisfied by reading a summary of all the different components - encryption, hashing, signing, PKI, how IPsec and SSL/TLS work. This group also counts most of security CCIEs.
To this extent CCIE Security Study Guide (by Henry Benjamin) was a good read, if a bit outdated today.
Most people who are in depth will look first into specification.
RFC 4301 (IPsec architecture)
RFC 2246 (TLS 1.0)
Are a good start and contain references to other documents worth reading.
This is where the good folks will base their knowledge of off.
The really in depth people will look into the math behind it and will conquer topics like
Elliptic Curve Crypto ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elliptic_curve_cryptography ) and difference between CCM, GCM and CCB, to which you have really good materials published by universities.
There are relatively a few who know this.
To start with I can suggest:
- http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rja14/book.html (Ross' Anderson book is free, informative and suprisngly entertaining, this is a definitely a must-read for security/VPN).
- Have a look at books recommended by Richard Bejtlich or Bruce Scheiner - while they might not be VPN specific it's a good security read most of the time.
I'll have a look at the books at home see which one can be interesting to read, and edit this post.
M.

Best practice for implementing a scalable ecommerce solution

Hi,
I'm new to SAP Business One, is there a white paper on the best practice of implementing a scalable ecommerce solution with SAP Business One using IIS/ASP.NET? What licensing and software(version)is need to implement a scalable ecommerce solution. How to integrate with trade partners via BizTalk server? Any help on these topics would be most helpful. Thanks in advance.
Best Regards,
Viet

There already is a very robust ecommerce package certified by SAP that runs on ASP.Net and integrates into Business One. It is called NetPoint Commerce and it is made by Praxis Software Solutions. http://www.praxissoft.net you can see a working B2C site of it at http://www.yakpak.com and it also has robust B2B functionality you can email [email protected] for a demo. The cost is only a little more than it would cost to cover all appropiate licenses with SAP (included in the NetPoint cost) plus it works with SBO 6.5 and SBO 2004 and the DI Server is only available with SBO 2004

Best practices for implementing OIM

We plan on putting OIM servers behind LB (hardware). When I develop OIM client I am required to specify OIM endpoint(s) via property java.naming.provider.url. In case of LB I'd specify a virtual host there. The question is what is the best practice for configuring LB - timeout, persistence, monitoring? I don think LB vendor is relevant, but just in case, I have a choice of F5 BigIP and Citrix Netscaler.
My understanding is that Java class tcUtilityFactory is supposed to be instantiated once (in a web client) and maintain the connection, but LB will close the connection after timeout is exceeded. So another question is if I want to use LB I have to take care of rebuilding connection when it is expired, or open/close connection every time tcUtilityFactory is needed. Any advice will be appreciated.
Thanks,
Alex

No i was not going to sync timeouts - just let it close connections after say, 5 min of inactivity. The reason is that performance data is horrible - from my desktop environment, initialization takes almost 9 sec, while reading data from OIM - only 150 milliseconds. I can't afford more than .5 sec on the whole OIM operation, as we are talking about customer experience.
Thanks,
Alex

Graphical display of best practice for implementing SAP NetWeaver

Hi,
in a presentation I need to show best practice to implement SAP NetWeaver is evaluating required KPIs, characteristics and so on and subsequently verifying the Business Content functionality and objects against these requirements.
Can anybody provide a presentation or PDF document in which this process is displayed graphically? I am looking for a significant picture / diagram ...
Any document or link to public SAP material which demonstrates the described process would be highly appreciated.
[email protected]
Best regards,
Björn

Hi,
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/developerareas/bi?rid=/webcontent/uuid/e78a5148-0701-0010-7da9-a6c721c6112e [original link is broken]
Regards,
San!

Best Practices for Implementing BI7.0

Dear all,
We are currently in BI 3.5 and have planned to go for BI 7.0.I have a few questions
1. Is the BI in Netweaver 2004s is BI7.0?
2. What are the best practices to go for BI 7.0? I found few documents regarding the Best Practices in service.sap.com
3. Where can I find more detailed information and documents for implementing BI7.0?
If you have any document can you please send it to
(yo - no email addresses in here buddy boy)
Thanks & Regards,
Chandran Gansan
Message was edited by: Ron Silberstein

Dear Chandran,
1. Is the BI in Netweaver 2004s is BI7.0?
>> I read some posts before that the correct term should be SAP Netweaver 2004s; Whereas the SAP BW3.5 is referred to SAP Netweaver 2004. I hope I am not mistaken.
2. What are the best practices to go for BI 7.0? I found few documents regarding the Best Practices in service.sap.com
3. Where can I find more detailed information and documents for implementing BI7.0?
>> Since you have access to the SAP service marketplace, kindly check under the categories: bi, bifaq, sevices & implementation.
Hope this helps..
Thanks...

Best Practice for Implementing Exception Handling in BPEL

Hi All,
what is the best practice and the approach to follow Exception Handling in BPEL.
1) Do we need to implement Exception Handling in BPEL as we do in Java, means
     method 3 throws error to method 2 (if any) and
     method 2 throws error to method 1 (if any) and
     finally method 1 throws error to the main Class.
If we replicate the above scenario to BPEL
In BPEL main Scope have Custom Fault, Catch ALL
     Each Invoke is surrounded by a Scope Activity with Remote Fault, Binding Fault & Custom Fault
and follow the paradigm of Java, assuming we have Inner Scopes
     [ OR ]
2) In BPEL main Scope have all exceptions defined like
     Remote Fault,
     Binding Fault,
     anyOther System Fault (selectionFailure / forcedTermination),
     Custom Fault (if required) and
     CatchALL
     and also
     each Invoke is surrounded by a Scopes Acitivity with Custom Fault (business fault) exception Handling
I feel 1st one may not be a good practice, may be i am wrong...
Any Suggestions from experts.
Thanks in Advance
anvv sharma

Hi-
In you can create different scope and use catch branch to catch binding, remote, custom faults, business faults etc. If an error happens in a scope it will not move to the next scope( eg: you have 3 scope, error occured in 2nd scope then it will not propogate to the 3rd scope. One thing to be noticed here is your transaction in the 1st scope doesnt gets commited when an error happens in 2d scope).
You can have a catch all to catch error which are not being caught at catch level. So if any error happens which is not defined in catch block then then it will be caught in catch all branch.
Edited by: 333333 on Apr 12, 2011 9:39 AM

Best practice for implementing META tags for content items?

Hello,
The portal site I'm responsible for managing our content (www.sers.state.pa.us) runs on the following WebCenter products:
WebCenter Interaction 10.3.0.1
WebCenter Publisher 6.5
WebCenter Studio 2.2 MP1
Content Service 10gR3
The agency I work for is one of many for the commonwealth of PA, which use this product suite, and I'm encountering some confusion on how to apply META tags to the content items for our site, so we can have effective search results. According to the [W3C site's explanation on META tag standards|http://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_meta.asp], the tags for description, keywords, etc, should be within the head region of the HTML document. However, with how the WebCenter suite's configuration is set up, the head section of the HTML is closed off by the end of the template code for a common header portlet. I was advised to add fields to our presentation and data entry templates for content, to add these meta fields, however, since they are then placed within the body section of the HTML as a result, these tags fail to have any positive impact on the search results. Instead, many of our content items, when searched for, the description in the search results only shows text that is displayed in the header and left navigation of our template, which come early in the body section of the HTML.
Please advise as to possible method(s) that would be best to implement usage of META tags so we can get our pages containing content to come up in search results with this relevant data.
Thanks in advance,
Brian

if i remember right the index server will capture meta tags even if they are not in the <head> section. it is not well formed html but I think i remember that we created meta tags down in the body section and the index server still picked them up. you might try this and see if it still works. i believe it worked in 10gR3. Let me know your results.

Best practice for implementing services

I am doing some testing with implementing webservices and i am wondering what it the best way...
First some background about the project. The idea is that the user interfaces uses webservices for almost everything. The complete datalayer is created somewhere else and i just use those services. For example i have a WSDL that holds the UserServices. It describes the service for creating,updating,deleting, getUserByCompany, getUserByKey and some other stuff.
As far as i can see, i have 2 options in JDev
1) Create a datacontrol based upon the WSDL. This way i can easily drag&drop the services and use the databindings.
I'm afraid that this approach is not that flexibel. It isn't realy easy to update the DC once the WSDL has been changed.
I have a popup to edit/create a user. It also does not seem easy to implement this because when i open the popup for create, my input fields should be bound to the parameters for the createService but when i open the popup to edit a user, those fields should be bound to the editService instead. This does not look easy...
Also, the table that lists the users depends on the role of the user. When an admin request the page with the user table, he must see all the users but when another user request the page, he can only see the users from his company so we have 2 services for this: getUsers (gets all the users) and getUsersByCompany so here also, my table can be bound to 2 services... Does not seem to be easy to implement.
2) The second way of implementing services is using a proxy. This seems way more flexible. I just creates a java interface to call the service. This way i can create my own pojo's and create a DC from that.
This way i can create a function getUsers(String company). When i drop that to my page, i can bind the company parameter to a backing bean. THis way i can write some logic in the pojo based upon the value. If company is null i return the result of the getUser service, else i use the getUsersByCompany service instead.
It's also very easy to regenerate the proxy if the wsdl has been changed. Somethign that isn't possible with the first way.
What do you do when you use webservices this way? If their any difference in performance?
Any other tips.

You got it basically right.
With the proxy approach you write get code that wraps your calls to the Web service - and this allows you to do various modifications on how the service is called, what to do with the results etc.
However check out this example to see how you can use the same result set in a Web service data control for both a query and an update/insert:
http://blogs.oracle.com/shay/2010/05/updateinsert_with_adf_web_serv.html

Best practice for HR while cost center is blocked

Hi Experts,
Back ground
Cost center is blocked because the legal entity is demerged.
Some of the employees of the outgoing company are retained in existing legal entity.
Their current cost centers are of the existing entity.
All the historical costcenters of the outgoing entity are blocked.
Situation
While there is a retro payment the system is rejecting as the old cost centers are blocked.
Workarounds used
Open the cost center for posting and then manually transfer the amount into desired cost center and then re-close the Costcenter.
SAP Suggestion
Use substitute cost center so that all costs are colloected their and do the manual transfer of cost to desired ones.
Could not use the same as business has to do the same manual activity.
Solution
Taken access key into the posting driver to change the cost center to current while there is an occurence of blocked cost center.
Requirement
Want to use the standard posting driver by removing all customization in upgrade.
Now the Qtn is
What is the best business process followed by FI and HR guys in organization to handle such scenarios?

Old question, but I have the same problem at this moment.
We also are looking into 2 solutions:
1. use the substitution costcenters
2. Create a custom function in our payroll scheme and modify the costcenter during payroll-run. Normally the costcenter will eb saved in the clusters and will be read from the clusters in the fico-run.
Anybody some good advice for this?

What is the best practice for implementing scheduled tasks in ADF?

Hi experts,
I'm using Jdev 12.1.3, and I'd need your advice in how implement scheduled tasks.
We have today a button that generates a Jasper pdf report correctly. The new requirement is to schedule a task that automatically send this pdf via email once a week.
Thanks in advance for your help.
Best regards,
Jose.

Refer
Andrejus Baranovskis Blog: Optimizing Long Running ADF Operations with Parallel WebLogic Time Manager Execution
http://www.gebs.ro/blog/oracle/timer-task-in-adf/
https://technology.amis.nl/2011/10/19/adf-faces-handle-task-in-background-process-and-show-real-time-progress-indicator-…

Best practice for implementing Manufacturing Cost Planning ( MCP)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for