Best Practice to create bidder for massive suppliers

Hi.
I pulled 2000 vendors from ECC system and I do have all the required data to create bidders. Could you please tell me how how to create bidders for massive suppliers easily and effectively?
Thanks,
Darma

refer the below thread
Re: Upload Bidders
Arshad
Edited by: arshad ahmed on Jun 23, 2010 9:38 AM

Similar Messages

Any suggestions for best practice when creating assets for tablets?

General community question,
I'm about to start creating a tablet demo of a few assets that have already been created for web that need adapting for tablet (namely iOS on iPad). I was wondering if anyone could share some pointers about what to avoid doing or some top tips to ensure that they can be converted as quickly and easily as possible, particularly given the state of the current version of EA.
Any suggestions or links to relevant websites would be welcome!
Cheers,
D

General community question,
I'm about to start creating a tablet demo of a few assets that have already been created for web that need adapting for tablet (namely iOS on iPad). I was wondering if anyone could share some pointers about what to avoid doing or some top tips to ensure that they can be converted as quickly and easily as possible, particularly given the state of the current version of EA.
Any suggestions or links to relevant websites would be welcome!
Cheers,
D

What are the best practices to create surrounding borders?

Good day everyone,
I was wondering what is the best practices to create a look in my iOS app like the one below? How are they accomplishing the creation of the borders, is there a tool in Xcode IB to do that?
Thank you in advance

Once again thanks for your input, however I am still not clear how you have accomplish the rounded corners, you do not mention that in your reply.
I did some research on my end and I was able to accomplish what I want with a UIView using the code below in an outlet:
redView.layer.cornerRadius = 10;
redView.layer.borderColor = [UIColor greenColor].CGColor;
redView.layer.borderWidth = 5;
However, I cannot do the same for the UITableView or UITableView cell.
Thanks

Best practice to create Voyager conn on SAP BI INFOCUBE OR SAP BI Query

I wanted to know which is the best practice to create a Voyager connection on SAP BI Infocube or SAP BI Query?
which is gud for more performance?

Hi Nirmansyah,
Please check the below link.
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/library/business-intelligence/s-u/step-by-step%20procedure%20for%20creating%20customized%20bex%20maps.pdf
Hope this helps.
Veerendra.

Best practice to create a database

please can you send me the best practice to create a database which is want to be used in the future for a dataware house

Hi,
For Dataware housing purpose only means you can create the database by using DBCA. or for only transctional purpose means you can create manyally. like create control file , datafiles and all.
Thanks and Regards
Venkat.K.Raju
Mindlance,
Oracle Applications Team
BANGLORE..66
Mobile:+919986556688
Land:080-41464843 Ext-4942
[email protected]

Best practice to define length for varchar field of table in sql server

What is best practice to define length for a varchar field in table
where field suppose Remarks By Person varchar(max) or varchar(4000)
Could it affect on optimization in future????
experts Reply Must ...
Dilip Patil..

Hi Dilip,
Varchar(n/max) is a variable-length, non-unicode character data. N defines the string length and can be a value from 1 through 8,000. Max indicates that the maximum storage size is 2^31-1 bytes (2 GB). The storage size is the actual length of the data entered
+ 2 bytes. We always use varchar when the sizes of the column data entries vary considerably. While if the filed data size might exceed 8,000 bytes in some way, we should use varchar(max).
So the conclusion is just like Uri said, use varchar(max) or varchar(4000) is depends on how much characters we are going to store.
The following document about varchar in SQL Server is for your reference:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms176089.aspx
Thanks,
Katherine Xiong
Katherine Xiong
TechNet Community Support

Best practice to create multi tier (atleast 3 level) table

What is the best practice to create multi tier (minimum 3 levels) of table?. Could any one provide a sample structure?.
Thanks.

Can u b more specific as to what you are trying to do. What u mean by 3 level table?

Best practice on Oracle VM for Sparc System

Dear All,
I want to test Oracle VM for Sparc System but I don't have new model Server to test it. What is the best practice of Oracle VM for Sparc System?
I have a Dell laptop which has spec as below:
-Intel® CoreTM i7-2640M
(2.8GHz, 4MB cache)
- Ram: 8GB DDR3
- HDD: 750GB
-1GB AMD Radeon
I want to install Oracle VM VirtualBox on my laptop and then install Oracle VM for Sparc System in Virtual Box, is it possible?
Please kindly give advice,
Thanks and regards,
Heng

Heng Horn wrote:
How about computer desktop or computer workstation with the latest version has CPU supports Oracle VM or SPARC?Nope. The only place you find SPARC T4 processors is in Sun Servers (and some Fujitsu servers, I think).

Best practices to reduce downtime for Database releases(rolling changes)

Hi,
What are best practices to reduce downtime for database releases on 10.2.0.3? What DB changes can be rolling and what can't?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
RJiv.

I would be very dubious about any sort of universal "best practices" here. Realistically, your practices need to be tailored to the application and the environment.
You can invest a lot of time, energy, and resources into minimizing downtime if that is the only goal. But you'll generally pay for that goal in terms of developer and admin time and effort, environmental complexity, etc. And you generally need to architect your application with rolling upgrades in mind, which necessitates potentially large amounts of redesign to existing applications. It may be perfectly acceptable to go full-bore into minimizing downtime if you are running Amazon.com and any downtime is unacceptable. Most organizations, however, need to balance downtime against other needs.
For example, you could radically minimize downtime by having a second active database, configuring Streams to replicate changes between the two master databases, and configure the middle tier environment so that you can point different middle tier servers against one or the other database. When you want to upgrade, you point all the middle tier servers against database A other than 1 that lives on a special URL. You upgrade database B (making sure to deal with the Streams replication environment properly depending on requirements) and do the smoke test against the special URL. When you determine that everything works, you configure all the app servers to point at B and have Streams replication process configured to replicate changes from the old data model to the new data model), upgrade B, repeat the smoke test, and then return the middle tier environment to the normal state of balancing between databases.
This lets you upgrade with 0 downtime. But you've got to license another primary database. And configure Streams. And write the replication code to propagate the changes on B during the time you're smoke testing A. And you need the middle tier infrastructure in place. And you're obviously going to be involving more admins than you would for a simpler deploy where you take things down, reboot, and bring things up. The test plan becomes more complicated as well since you need to practice this sort of thing in lower environments.
Justin

What is the best way to create space for a Yosemite download?

What are the best ways to create space for the download of Yosemite. I can't install it as I don't have enough space.

Did you empty Trash? Very important!
How much space do you have available? Click in the HDD icon on the desktop, COMMAND+I.
Also try a Safe Boot:
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1564?viewlocale=en_US
That will temporarily create some additional space.
Ciao.

Looking for best practices when creating DNS reverse zones for DHCP

Hello,
We are migrating from ISC DHCP to Microsoft DHCP. We would like the DHCP server to automatically update DNS A and PTR records for computers when they get an IP. The question is, what is the best practice for creating the reverse look up zones in DNS? Here
is an example:
10.0.1.0/23
This would give out IPs from 10.0.1.1-10.0.2.254. So with this in mind, do we then create the following reverse DNS zones?:
1.0.10.in-addr.arpa AND 2.0.10.in-addr.arpa
OR do we only create:
0.10.in-addr.arpa And both 10.0.1 and 10.0.2 addresses will get stuffed into those zones.
Or is there an even better way that I haven't thought about? Thanks in advance.

Hi,
Base on your description, creating two reverse DNS zones 1.0.10.in-addr.arpa and 2.0.10.in-addr.arpa, or creating one reverse DNS zone 0.10.in-addr.arpa, both methods are all right.
Best Regards,
Tina

Best Practice setting up NICs for Hyper V 2008 r2

I am looking at some suggestions for best practice for setting up a hyper V 2008 r2 at a remote location with 5 nics, one for managment vlan and other 4 on the data vlan. This server will host 2 virtual machines, one is a DC and the other
is a member local DHCP server. The server is setup now with one nic on the management Vlan and the other nic's set to get there ip from the local dhcp server on on the host. We have the virtual networks setup in Hyper V to
point to each of the nics using the "external connection". The virtual servers 'DHCP and AD" have there own ip set within them. Issues we are seeing, when the site looses external connections for a while they cannot get ip
addresses from the local dhcp server anymore.
1. NIC on management Vlan -- IP Static -- Physical host
2. NIC on the Data network Vlan -- DHCP linked as a connection "external" in Hyper V -- virtual server DHCP
3. NIC on the Data network Vlan -- DHCP linked as a connection "external" in Hyper V -- Virtual server domain controller
4. NIC on the Data network Vlan -- DHCP linked as a connection "external" in Hyper V -- extra
5. NIC on the Data network Vlan -- DHCP linked as a connection "external" in Hyper V -- extra
Thanks in advance

Looks like you may be over complicating things here. More and more of the recommendations from Microsoft at this point would be to create a Logical Switch and then layer on Logical Networks for your management layers, but here is what I would do for
you simple remote office.
Management NIC: Looks good (Teaming would be better, but only if you had 2 different switching to protect against link failures at the switch level. Doesn't seem relevant in this case however.
NIC for Data Network VLAN: I would use one NIC in your case if you can have the ability to Trunk multiple VLANs at the switch level to the NIC. That way you are setting the VLAN on the VMs NIC that you want to access and your
Virtual Switch configuration is very simple. On this virtual switch however, I would uncheck IPv4 and IPv6. There is no need to give this NIC an address as you are just passing traffic through them from the VMs that are marked with VLAN tags. Again,
if you have multiple physical switches in the building teaming could be an option, but probably adds more complexity than is necessary for a small office.
Even if you keep your Virtual Switches linked to separate NICs unchecking IPv4 and IPv6 makes sense.
Disable all the other NICs
Beyond that, check your routing. Can you ping between all hosts when there is not interruption? What DHCP server are they getting there addresses on normally? Where are your name resolution servers (DNS, WINS)?
No silver bullet here, but maybe a step in the right direction.
Rob McShinsky (VirtuallyAware.com)
VirtuallyAware - Experiences in a Virtual World (Microsoft MVP - Virtual Machine)

Best practice to create views

Hi,
I've a question about best practice to develop a large application with many complex views.
Typically at each time only one views is displayed. User can go from a view to another using a menu bar.
Every view is build with fxml, so my question is about how to create views and how switch from one to another.
Actually I load fxml every time the view is required:
FXMLLoader loader = new FXMLLoader();
InputStream in = MyController.class.getResourceAsStream("MyView.fxml");
loader.setBuilderFactory(new JavaFXBuilderFactory());
loader.setLocation(OptixController.class.getResource("MyView.fxml"));
BorderPane page;
try {
     page = (BorderPane) loader.load(in);
     } finally {
          if (in != null) {
               in.close();
// appController = loader.getController();
Scene scene = new Scene(page, MINIMUM_WINDOW_WIDTH, MINIMUM_WINDOW_HEIGHT);
scene.getStylesheets().add("it/myapp/Mycss.css");
stage.setScene(scene);
stage.sizeToScene();
stage.setScene(scene);
stage.sizeToScene();
stage.centerOnScreen();
stage.show();My questions:
1- is a good practice reload every time the fxml to design the view?
2- is a good practice create every time a new Scene or to have an unique scene in the app and every time clear all elements in it and set the new view?
3- the views should be keep in memory to avoid performace issue or it is a mistake? I think that every time a view should be destroy in order to free memory.
Thanks very much
Edited by: drenda81 on 21-mar-2013 10.41

>
>
My questions:
1- is a good practice reload every time the fxml to design the view?
2- is a good practice create every time a new Scene or to have an unique scene in the app and every time clear all elements in it and set the new view?
3- the views should be keep in memory to avoid performace issue or it is a mistake? I think that every time a view should be destroy in order to free memory.
In choosing between 1 and 3 above, I think either is fine. Loading the FXML on demand every time will be slightly slower, but assuming you are not doing something unusual such as loading over a network connection it won't be noticeable to the user. Loading all views at startup and keeping them in memory uses more memory, but again, it's unlikely to be an issue. I would choose whichever is easier to code (probably loading on demand).
In choosing between reusing a Scene or creating a new one each time, I would reuse the Scene. "Clearing all elements in it" only needs you to call scene.setRoot(...) and pass in the new view. Since the Scene has a mutable root property, you may as well make use of it and save the (small) overhead of instantiating a new Scene each time. You might consider exposing a currentView property somewhere (say, in your main controller, or model if you have a separate model class) and binding the Scene's root property to it. Something like:
public class MainController {
private final ObjectProperty<Parent> currentView ;
public MainController() {
    currentView = new SimpleObjectProperty<Parent>(this, "currentView");
public void initialize() {
    currentView.set(loadView("StartView.fxml"));
public ObjectProperty<Parent> currentViewProperty() {
    return currentView ;
// event handler to load View1:
@FXML
private void loadView1() {
    currentView.set(loadView("View1.fxml"));
// similarly for other views...
private Parent loadView(String fxmlFile) {
    try {
     Parent view = FXMLLoader.load(getClass().getResource(fxmlFile));
     return view ;
    } catch (...) { ... }
}Then your application can do this:
@Override
public void start(Stage primaryStage) {
   Scene scene = new Scene();
   FXMLLoader loader = new FXMLLoader(getClass().getResource("Main.fxml"));
   MainController controller = (MainController) loader.getController();
   scene.rootProperty().bind(controller.currentViewProperty());
   // set scene in stage, etc...
}This means your Controller doesn't need to know about the Scene, which maintains a nice decoupling.

Best Practice on Creating Queries in Production

We are a fairly new BI installation. I'm interested in the approach other installations take to creation of queries in the production environment. Is it standard to create most queries directly into the production system? Or is it standard to develop the queries in the development system and transport them through to production?

Hi,
Best practices applied to all developments whether it is R/3, BI modelling or Reporting and as per the best practice we do development in Development system, testing in testing box and finally deploy successful development to production. yes for user analysis purpose, user can do adhoc analysis or in some scenario they create user specific custom queries (sometimes reffere as X-query created by super user).
So it is always to do all yr developement in Development Box and then transport to Production after successful QA testing.
Dev

Best practices when carry forward for audit adjustments

Dear experts,
I would like to know if someone can share his best practices when performing carry forward for audit adjustments.
We are actually doing legal consolidation for one customer and we are facing one issue.
The accounting team needs to pass audit adjustments around April-May for last year.
So from January to April / May, the opening balance must be based on December closing of prior year.
Then from May / June to December, the opening balance must be based on Audit closing of prior year.
We originally planned to create two members for December period, XXXX.DEC and XXXX.AUD
Once the accountants would know their audit closing balance, they would have to input it on the XXXX.AUD period and a business rule could compute the difference between the closing of AUD and DEC periods and store the result on an opening flow.
The opening flow hierarchy would be as follow:
F_OPETOT (Opening balance Total)
F_OPE (Opening balance from December)
F_OPEAUD (Opening balance from the difference between closing balance of Audit and December periods)
Now, assume that we are in October, but for any reason, the accountant run a carry forward for February, he is going to impact the opening balance because at this time (October), we have the audit adjustments.
How to avoid such a thing? What are the best practices in this case?
I guess it is something that you may have encounter if you did a consolidation project.
Any help will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Antoine Epinette

Cookman and I have been arguing about this since the paleozoic era. Here's my logic for capturing everything.
Less wear and tear on the tape and the deck.
You've got everything on the system. Can't tell you how many times a client has said "I know that there was a better take." The only way to disabuse them of this notion is to look at every take. if it's not on the system, you've got to spend more time finding the tape, and adding "wear and tear on the tape and the deck." And then there's the moment where you need to replace the audio for one word from another take. You can quickly check all the other takes (particularly if you've done a thorough job logging the material - see below)_.
Once it's on the system, you still need to log and learn the material. You can scan thru material much faster once it's captured. Jumping around the material is much easier.
There's no question that logging the material before you capture makes you learn the material in a more thorough way, but with enough selfdiscipline, you can learn the material as thoroughly once it's been captured.

Best Practice to create bidder for massive suppliers

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for