Best practices for 1000v CTRL/PKT/MGT VLANs

We are getting ready to start testing the 1000v in a lab environment, but have a question about VLAN best practices. In the current Cisco 1000v guides it indicates the control/packet/management interfaces should all be on the same VLAN. But elsewhere I've seen references to each network type getting its own VLAN. Given the latest release of the 1000v VSM/VEM, what is the real world best pracices for these three interfaces? Would you typically put all three on the same management VLAN used for physical switches?

You can safely put them on the same vlan. The call to put them on different vlans was in the initial 1.1 release. We changed that view with the 1.2 release and fully support and recommend putting them all on the same vlan. The only requirement now is that we need no more than 100ms latency on the control network.
louis

Similar Messages

Best practice for Wireless ap vlan

Is there a best practice for grouping lightweight access points in one vlan or allowing them to be spread across several ??

Whether you have multiple sites or not, it's good practice to put your APs in a separate and dedicated VLAN.
If your sites are routed sites, then you can re-use the same VLAN numbers but make sure they are on separate subnets and/or VRF instance.

Networking "best practice" for setting up a farm

Hi all.
We would like to set an OracleVM farm, and I have a question about "best practice" for
configuring the network. Some background:
- The hardware I have is comprised of machines with 4 gig-eth NICs each.
- The storage will be coming primarily from a backend NAS appliance (Netapp, FWIW).
- We have already allocated a separate VLAN for management.
- We would like to have HA capable VMs using OCFS2 (on top of NFS.)
I'm trying to decide between 2 possible configurations. The first would keep physical separation
between the mgt/storage networks and the DomU networks. The second would just trunk
everything together across all 4 NICs, something like:
Config 1:
- eth0 - management/cluster-interconnect
- eth1 - storage
- eth2/eth3 => bond0 - 8021q trunked, bonded interfaces for DomUs
Config 2:
- eth0/1/2/3 => bond0
Do people have experience or recommendation about the best configuration?
I'm attracted to the first option (perhaps naively) because CI/storage would benefit
from dedicated bandwidth and this configuration might also be more secure.
Regards,
Robert.

user1070509 wrote:
Option #4 (802.3ad) looks promising, but I don't know if this can be made to work across
separate switches.It can, if your switches support cross-switch trunking. Essentially, 802.3ad (also known as LACP or EtherChannel on Cisco devices) requires your switch to be properly configured to allow trunking across the interfaces used for the bond. I know that the high-end Cisco and Juniper switches do support LACP across multiple switches. In the Cisco world, this is called MEC (Multichassis EtherChannel).
If you're using low-end commodity-grade gear, you'll probably need to use active/passive bonds if you want to span switches. Alternatively, you could use one of the balance algorithms for some bandwitch increase. You'd have to run your own testing to determine which algorithm is best suited for your workload.
The Linux Foundation's Net:Bonding article has some great information on bonding in general, particularly on the various bonding methods for high availability:
http://www.linuxfoundation.org/en/Net:Bonding

Best Practice for FlexConnect Wireless roaming in MediaNet environment?

Hello!
Current Cisco best practice recommendations for enterprise MediaNet design, specify that VLANs be local to a switch / switch stack (i.e., to limit the scope of spanning-tree).
In the wireless world, this causes problems if you want users while roaming to keep real-time applications up and running. Every time they connect to a new AP on a different VLAN, then they will need to get a new IP address, which interrupts real-time apps.
So...best practice for LAN users causes real problems for wireless users.
I thought I'd post here in case there's a best practice for implementing wireless roaming in a routed environment that we might have missed so far!
We have a failover pair of FlexConnect 7510s, btw, configured for local switching for Internal users, and central switching with an anchor controller on the DMZ for Guest users.
Thanks,
Deb

Thanks for your replies, Stephen and JSnyder.
The situation here is that the original design engineer is no longer here, and the original design was not MediaNet-friendly, in that it had a very few /20 subnets bridged over entire large sites.
These several large sites (with a few hundred wireless users per site), are connected to an HQ location (where the 7510s in failover mode are installed) via 1G ethernet hand-offs (MPLS at the WAN provider). The 7510s are new, and are replacing older contollers at the HQ location.
The internal employee wireless users use resources both local to their site, as well as centralized resources. There are at least as many Guest wireless users per site as there are internal employee users, and the service to them consists of Internet traffic only. (When moved to the 7510s, their traffic will continue to be centrally switched and carried to an anchor controller in the DMZ.)
(1) So, going local mode seems impractical due to the sheer number of users whose traffic bound for their local site would be traversing the WAN twice. Too much bandwidth would be used. So, that implies the need to use Flex / HREAP mode instead.
(2) However, re-designing each site's IP environment for MediaNet would suggest to go routed to the closet. However, this breaks seamless roaming for users....
So, this conundrum is why I thought I'd post here, and see if there was some other cool / nifty solution I wasn't yet aware of.
The only other (possibly friendly to both needs) solution I'd thought of was to GRE tunnel a subnet from each closet to the collapsed Core / Disti switch at each site. Unfortunately, GRE tunnels are not supported in the rev of IOS on the present equipment, and so it isn't possible to try this idea.
Another "blue sky" idea I had (not for this customer, but possibly elsewhere in the future), is to use LAN switches such as 3850s that have WLC functionality built-in. I haven't yet worked with the WLC s/w available on those, but I was thinking it looks like they could be put into a mobility group, and L3 user roaming between them might then work. Do you happen to know if this might be a workable solution to the overall big-picture problem?
Thanks again for taking the time and trouble to reply!
Deb

Best practice for mouseless ADF applications

I am developing an ADF application where the users do not want to use the mouse.
So I would like to know if there are a best practice for this?
I am already using the accessKey functionality and subforms defaultCommand
But I have had problems setting focus to objects on a page like tables. I would like a button to return the focus to the table after it has made the command like delete.
I have implemented a solution where I have found inspiration several threads and other webpages (see below).
Is this solution okay?
Are there any problems with it?
I would also like to know if there are better pathways to go like
out of the box solutions,
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/developer-tools/adf/learnmore/79-global-template-button-strategy-360139.pdf (are there an example implementation?), or
http://one-size-doesnt-fit-all.blogspot.dk/2010/11/adf-ui-shell-supporting-global-hotkeys.html
in advance thanks
Inspiration webpages
https://blogs.oracle.com/jdevotnharvest/entry/how_to_programmatically_set_focus
http://technology.amis.nl/2008/01/04/adf-11g-rich-faces-focus-on-field-after-button-press-or-ppr-including-javascript-in-ppr-response-and-clientlisteners-client-side-programming-in-adf-faces-rich-client-components-part-2/
how to Commit table by writting Java code in Managed Bean?
Table does not refresh and getting error as UIComponent is Null
A short description of the solution:
(jdeveloper version 11.1.1.2.0)
--- Example where I use onSetFocus in jsff page
<af:commandButton text="#{hrsusuiBundle.FOCUS}" id="cb10"
partialSubmit="true" accessKey="f"
shortDesc="Alt+Shift+F"
actionListener="#{managedBean_clientUtils.onSetFocus}">
<af:clientAttribute name="focusField" value="t1"/>
</af:commandButton>
--- Examples where I use doTableActionAndSetFocus in jsff page
--- There have to be a binding in the jsff page to delete, commit and rollback
<af:commandButton text="#{hrsusuiBundle.DELETE}" id="cb4"
accessKey="x"
shortDesc="Alt+Shift+X"
partialSubmit="true"
actionListener="#{managedBean_clientUtils.doTableActionAndSetFocus}">
<af:clientAttribute name="focusField" value="t1"/>
<af:clientAttribute name="actionField" value="Delete"/>
</af:commandButton>
<af:commandButton text="#{hrsusuiBundle.COMMIT}" id="cb5"
accessKey="s" shortDesc="Alt+Shift+S"
partialSubmit="true"
actionListener="#{managedBean_clientUtils.doTableActionAndSetFocus}">
<af:clientAttribute name="focusField" value="t1"/>
<af:clientAttribute name="actionField" value="Commit"/>
</af:commandButton>
<af:commandButton text="#{hrsusuiBundle.ROLLBACK}" id="cb6"
accessKey="z" shortDesc="Alt+Shift+Z"
partialSubmit="true"
actionListener="#{managedBean_clientUtils.doTableActionAndSetFocus}"
immediate="true">
<af:resetActionListener/>
<af:clientAttribute name="focusField" value="t1"/>
<af:clientAttribute name="actionField" value="Rollback"/>
</af:commandButton>
--- This is the java class I use
--- It is published in adfc-config.xml as a request scope managedbean
public class ClientUtils {
public ClientUtils() {
public void doTableActionAndSetFocus(ActionEvent event) {
RichCommandButton rcb = (RichCommandButton)event.getSource();
String focusOn = (String)rcb.getAttributes().get("focusField");
String actionToDo = (String)rcb.getAttributes().get("actionField");
UIComponent component = null;
String clientId = null;
component = JSFUtils.findComponentInRoot(focusOn);
clientId = component.getClientId(JSFUtils.getFacesContext());
if ( "Delete".equals(actionToDo) || "Commit".equals(actionToDo) || "Rollback".equals(actionToDo) ){
BindingContainer bindings = BindingContext.getCurrent().getCurrentBindingsEntry();
OperationBinding operationBinding = bindings.getOperationBinding(actionToDo);
Object result = operationBinding.execute();
AdfFacesContext.getCurrentInstance().addPartialTarget(component);
if (clientId != null) {
makeSetFocusJavaScript(clientId);
public static String onSetFocus(ActionEvent event) {
RichCommandButton rcb = (RichCommandButton)event.getSource();
String focusOn = (String)rcb.getAttributes().get("focusField");
String clientId = null;
if (focusOn.contains(":")) {
clientId = focusOn;
} else {
clientId = findComponentsClientIdInRoot(focusOn);
if (clientId != null) {
makeSetFocusJavaScript(clientId);
return null;
private static void writeJavaScriptToClient(String script) {
FacesContext fctx = FacesContext.getCurrentInstance();
ExtendedRenderKitService erks = null;
erks = Service.getRenderKitService(fctx, ExtendedRenderKitService.class);
erks.addScript(fctx, script);
public static void makeSetFocusJavaScript(String clientId) {
if (clientId != null) {
StringBuilder script = new StringBuilder();
//use client id to ensure component is found if located in
//naming container
script.append("var textInput = ");
script.append("AdfPage.PAGE.findComponentByAbsoluteId");
script.append ("('"+clientId+"');");
script.append("if(textInput != null){");
script.append("textInput.focus();");
script.append("}");
writeJavaScriptToClient(script.toString());
public static String findComponentsClientIdInRoot(String id) {
UIComponent component = null;
String clientId = null;
component = JSFUtils.findComponentInRoot(id);
clientId = component.getClientId(JSFUtils.getFacesContext());
return clientId;
}

Hi,
I am developing an ADF application where the users do not want to use the mouse. So I would like to know if there are a best practice for this?
Well HTML (and this is the user interface you see) follows a tab index navigation that you follow with "tab" and "shift+tab". Anything else is a short cut for which you use mnemonics (as you already do) or shortcuts (explained in http://one-size-doesnt-fit-all.blogspot.dk/2010/11/adf-ui-shell-supporting-global-hotkeys.html). There is a distinction to make between non-web environments (which I think you and your users have abackground in) and client desktop environments. Browsers block some keyboard functionality for their own purpose. So you may have to find a list of keys first that work across browsers. Unlike desktop clients, which allow you to "press a button" without the button to take focus, this cannot be done on the web. So you need to be clever here, avoiding buttons at all.
The following paper is about JavaScript in ADF and explains the basics for what Chris Muir explains in : http://one-size-doesnt-fit-all.blogspot.dk/2010/11/adf-ui-shell-supporting-global-hotkeys.html
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/developer-tools/jdev/1-2011-javascript-302460.pdf
It has the outline for how to register short cut keys that perform a specific action (e.g. register ctrl+d to delete the current row you are on, or press F11 to execute a query (similar to Oracle Forms frmres files)). However, be aware that this includes some code you have to write (actually quite some code to be honest).
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/developer-tools/adf/learnmore/79-global-template-button-strategy-360139.pdf (are there an example implementation?), or
http://one-size-doesnt-fit-all.blogspot.dk/2010/11/adf-ui-shell-supporting-global-hotkeys.html
Actually these are implementations as they come with example code for you to use and customize, do they? So what is this question asking for more ? Also note that global buttons don't quite have anything in common with the question you asked. I assume you want to see it as an implementation of the Forms toolbar that operates on the form or table the focus is in. This however does not work for the web as there is nothing that keeps track of which component has a focus and to what iterator (data block) it belongs. This would involve even more coding (though possibly doable)
Frank

Best practice for intervlan routing?

are there some best practices for intervlan routing ?
I've been reading allot and I have seen these scenarios
router on a stick
intervlan at core layer
intervlan at distribution layer.
or is intervlan needed at all if the switches will do the routing?
I've done all of the above but I just want to know what's current.

The simple answer is it depends because there is no one right solution for everyone.
So there are no specific best practices. For example in a small setup where you may only need a couple of vlans you could use a L2 switch connected to a router or firewall using subinterfaces to route between the vlans.
But that is not a scalable solution. The commonest approach in any network where there are multiple vlans is to use L3 switches to do this. This could be a pair of switches interconnected and using HSRP/GLBP/VRRP for the vlans or it could be stacked switches/VSS etc. You would then dual connect your access layer switches to them.
In terms of core/distro/access layer in general if you have separate switches performing each function you would have the inter vlan routing done on the distribution switches for all the vlans on the access layer switches. The core switches would be used to route between the disribution switches and other devices eg. WAN routers, firewalls, maybe other distribution switch pairs.
Again, generally speaking, you may well not need vlans on the core switches at all ie. you can simply use routed links between the core switches and everything else.
The above is quite a common setup but there are variations eg. -
1) a collapsed core design where the core and distribution switches are the same pair. For a single building with maybe a WAN connection plus internet this is quite a common design because having a completely separate core is usually quite hard to justify in terms of cost etc.
2) a routed access layer. Here the access layer switches are L3 and the vlans are routed at the access layer. In this instance you may not not even need vlans on the distribution switches although again to save cost often servers are deployed onto those switches so you may.
So a lot of it comes down to the size of the network and the budget involved as to which solution you go with.
All of the above is really concerned with non DC environments.
In the DC the traditional core/distro or aggregation/access layer was also used and still is widely deployed but in relatively recent times new designs and technologies are changing the environment which could have a big impact on vlans.
It's mainly to do with network virtualisation, where the vlans are defined and where they are not only routed but where the network services such as firewalling, load balancing etc. are performed.
It's quite a big subject so i didn't want to confuse the general answer by going into it but feel free to ask if you want more details.
Jon

Best practices for setting up users on a small office network?

Hello,
I am setting up a small office and am wondering what the best practices/steps are to setup/manage the admin, user logins and sharing privileges for the below setup:
Users: 5 users on new iMacs (x3) and upgraded G4s (x2)
Video Editing Suite: Want to connect a new iMac and a Mac Pro, on an open login (multiple users)
All machines are to be able to connect to the network, peripherals and external hard drive. Also, I would like to setup drop boxes as well to easily share files between the computers (I was thinking of using the external harddrive for this).
Thank you,

Hi,
Thanks for your posting.
When you install AD DS in the hub or staging site, disconnect the installed domain controller, and then ship the computer to the remote site, you are disconnecting a viable domain controller from the replication topology.
For more and detail information, please refer to:
Best Practices for Adding Domain Controllers in Remote Sites
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc794962(v=ws.10).aspx
Regards.
Vivian Wang

Best-practice for Catalog Views ? :|

Hello community,
A best practice question:
The situtation: I have several product categories (110), several items in those categories (4000) and 300 end-users. I would like to know which is the best practice for segment the catalog. I mean, some users should only see categories 10,20 & 30. Other users only category 80, etc. The problem is how can I implement this ?
My first idea is:
1. Create 110 Procurement Catalogs (1 for every prod.category). Each catalog should contain only its product category.
2. Assign in my Org Model, in a user-level all the "catalogs" that the user should access.
Do you have any idea in order to improve this ?
Saludos desde Mexico,
Diego

Hi,
Your way of doing will work, but you'll get maintenance issues (to many catalogs, and catalog link to maintain for each user).
The other way is to built your views in CCM, and assign these views to the users, either on the roles (PFCG) or on the user (SU01). The problem is that with CCM 1.0 this is limitated, cause you'll have to assign one by one the items to each view (no dynamic or mass processes), it has been enhanced in CCM 2.0.
My advice:
-Challenge your customer about views, and try to limit the number of views, with for example strategic and non strategic
-With CCM 1.0 stick to the procurement catalogs, or implement BADIs to assign items to the views (I experienced it, it works, but is quite difficult), but with a limitated number of views
Good luck.
Vadim

Best Practice for Securing Web Services in the BPEL Workflow

What is the best practice for securing web services which are part of a larger service (a business process) and are defined through BPEL?
They are all deployed on the same oracle application server.
Defining agent for each?
Gateway for all?
BPEL security extension?
The top level service that is defined as business process is secure itself through OWSM and username and passwords, but what is the best practice for security establishment for each low level services?
Regards
Farbod

It doesnt matter whether the service is invoked as part of your larger process or not, if it is performing any business critical operation then it should be secured.
The idea of SOA / designing services is to have the services available so that it can be orchestrated as part of any other business process.
Today you may have secured your parent services and tomorrow you could come up with a new service which may use one of the existing lower level services.
If all the services are in one Application server you can make the configuration/development environment lot easier by securing them using the Gateway.
Typical probelm with any gateway architecture is that the service is available without any security enforcement when accessed directly.
You can enforce rules at your network layer to allow access to the App server only from Gateway.
When you have the liberty to use OWSM or any other WS-Security products, i would stay away from any extensions. Two things to consider
The next BPEL developer in your project may not be aware of Security extensions
Centralizing Security enforcement will make your development and security operations as loosely coupled and addresses scalability.
Thanks
Ram

Best practice for multi-language content in common areas

I've got a site with some text in header/footer/nav that needs to be translated between an English and Spanish site, which use the same design. My intention was to set up all the text as content to facilitate. However, if I use a standard dialog with the component's path set to a child of the current page node, I would need to re-enter the text on every page. If I use a design dialog, or a standard dialog with the component's path set absolutely, the Engilsh and Spanish sites will share the same text. If I use a standard dialog with the component's path set relatively (eg path="../../jcr:content/myPath"), the pages using the component would all need to be at the same level of the hierarchy.
It appears that the Geometrixx demo doesn't address this situation, and leaves copy in English. Is there a best practice for this scenario?

I'm finding that something to the effect of <cq:include path="<%= strCommonContentPath + "codeEntry" %>" resourceType ...
works fine for most components, but not for parsys, or a component containing a parsys. When I attempt that, I get a JS error that says "design.path is null or not an object". Is there a way around this?

Best Practice for utility in Sol Man 4.0

We have software component ST-ICO of release 150_700 with Patch level 5
We want a Template Selection for Utility industry. I checked in
the service market place and found that 'Baseline Package United
Kingdom V1.50, Template: BP_BLKU150' is available in the above software
component.
But we are not getting any templates other than 'BP_UTUS147 - Best Practices for Water Utility' in the 'SOLAR_PROJECT_ADMIN'
transaction.
Kindly suggest any patch needs to be applied or some configuration need to be done.
Regards
Mani

Hi Mani,
Colud u plz give me the link of "where u find the template BP_BLKU150"?
It will be helpful for me.
Thanks
Senthil

Best Practices for SRM Installation !!

Hi
can someone share the best Practices for SRM Installation ?
What is the typical timeframe to install SRM on development server and as well as on the Production server ?
Appericiate the responses
Thanks,
Arvind

Hi
I don't know whether this will help you.
See these links as well.
<b>http://help.sap.com/bp_epv170/EP_US/HTML/Portals_intro.htm
http://help.sap.com/bp_scmv150/index.htm
http://help.sap.com/bp_biv170/index.htm
http://help.sap.com/bp_crmv250/CRM_DE/index.htm</b>
Hope this will help.
Please reward suitable points.
Regards
- Atul

Best practices for ARM - please help!!!

Hi all,
Can you please help with any pointers / links to documents describing best practices for "who should be creating" the GRC request in below workflow of ARM in GRC 10.0??
Create GRC request -> role approver -> risk manager -> security team
options are : end user / Manager / Functional super users / security team.
End user and manager not possible- we can not train so many people. Functional team is refusing since its a lot of work. Please help me with pointers to any best practices documents.
Thanks!!!!

In this case, I recommend proposing that the department managers create GRC Access Requests. In order for the managers to comprehend the new process, you should create a separate "Role Catalog" that describes what abilities each role enables. This Role Catalog needs to be taught to the department Managers, and they need to fully understand what tcodes and abilities are inside of each role. From your workflow design, it looks like Role Owners should be brought into these workshops.
You might consider a Role Catalog that the manager could filter on and make selections from. For example, an AP manager could select "Accounts Payable" roles, and then choose from a smaller list of AP-related roles. You could map business functions or tasks to specific technical roles. The design flaw here, of course, is the way your technical roles have been designed.
The point being, GRC AC 10 is not business-user friendly, so using an intuitive "Role Catalog" really helps the managers understand which technical roles they should be selecting in GRC ARs. They can use this catalog to spit out a list of technical role names that they can then search for within the GRC Access Request.
At all costs, avoid having end-users create ARs. They usually select the wrong access, and the process then becomes very long and drawn out because the role owners or security stages need to mix and match the access after the fact. You should choose a Requestor who has the highest chance of requesting the correct access. This is usually the user's Manager, but you need to propose this solution in a way that won't scare off the manager - at the end of the day, they do NOT want to take on more work.
If you are using SAP HR, then you can attempt HR Triggers for New User Access Requests, which automatically fill out and submit the GRC AR upon a specific HR action (New Hire, or Termination). I do not recommend going down this path, however. It is very confusing, time consuming, and difficult to integrate properly.
Good luck!
-Ken

Best Practices For Household IOS's/Apple IDs

Greetings:
I've been searching support for best practices for sharing primarily apps, music and video among multple iOS's/Apple IDs. If there is a specific article please point me to it.
Here is my situation:
We currently have 3 iPads (2-kids, 1-dad) in the household and one iTunes account on a win computer. I previously had all iPads on single Apple ID/credit card and controlled the kids' downloads thru the Apple ID password that I kept secret. As the kids have grown older, I found myself constantly entering my password as the kids increased there interest in music/apps/video. I like this approach because all content was shared...I dislike because I was constantly asked to input password for all downloads.
So, I recently set up an individual account for them with the allowance feature at iTunes that allows them to download content on their own (I set restrictions on their iPads). Now I have 3 Apple IDs under one household.
My questions:
With the 3 Apple IDs, what is the best way to share apps,music, videos among myself and the kids? Is it multiple accounts on the computer and some sort of sharing?
Thanks in advance...

Hi Bonesaw1962,
We've had our staff and students run iOS updates OTA via Settings -> Software Update. In the past, we put a DNS block on Apple's update servers to prevent users from updating iOS (like last fall when iOS 7 was first released). By blocking mesu.apple com, the iPads weren't able to check for or install any iOS software updates. We waited until iOS 7.0.3 was released before we removed the block to mesu.apple.com at which point we told users if they wanted to update to iOS 7 they could do so OTA. We used our MDM to run reports periodically to see how many people updated to iOS 7 and how many stayed on iOS 6. As time went on, just about everyone updated on their own.
If you go this route (depending on the number of devices you have), you may want to take a look at Caching Server 2 to help with the network load https://www.apple.com/osx/server/features/#caching-server . From Apple's website, "When a user on your network downloads new software from Apple, a copy is automatically stored on your server. So the next time other users on your network update or download that same software, they actually access it from inside the network."
I wish there was a way for MDMs to manage iOS updates, but unfortunately Apple hasn't made this feature available to MDM providers. I've given this feedback to our Apple SE, but haven't heard if it is being considered or not. Keeping fingers crossed.
Hope this helps. Let us know what you decide on and keep us posted on the progress. Good luck!!
~Joe

Basic Strategy / Best Practices for System Monitoring with Solution Manager

I am very new to SAP and the Basis group at my company. I will be working on a project to identify the best practices of System and Service level monitoring using Solution Manager. I have read a good amount about SAP Solution Manager and the concept of monitoring but need to begin mapping out a monitoring strategy.
We currently utilize the RZ20 transaction and basic CCMS monitors such as watching for update errors, availability, short dumps, etc.. What else should be monitored in order to proactively find possible issues. Are there any best practices you all have found when implimenting Monitoring for new solutions added to the SAP landscape.... what are common things we would want to monitor over say ERP, CRM, SRM, etc?
Thanks in advance for any comments or suggestions!

Hi Mike,
Did you try the following link ?
If not, it may be useful to some extent:
http://service.sap.com/bestpractices
---> Cross-Industry Packages ---> Best Practices for Solution Management
You have quite a few documents there - those on BPM may also cover Solution Monitoring aspects.
Best regards,
Srini
Edited by: Srinivasan Radhakrishnan on Jul 7, 2008 7:02 PM

Best practices for 1000v CTRL/PKT/MGT VLANs

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for