Best practise Analyzer for File Server

Hi Team,
I have a file which are running in windows 2003 server, we are going to migrate this server to another server which will be in 2008. I need best practice Analyzer or any tool, so that we can check file servers performance and data ,DFS Data.
Regards, Triyambak

actually we are planning to migrate our file server which is running on 2003 server to 2008 server , we want sure before migration that there is no issue with the DFS. DFS is based on Domain.
Just wanted to know what are the  things keep in mind during migration , what are the pre-analysis required before migration
Regards, Triyambak

Similar Messages

  • Where is Best Practices Analyzer for SQL Server 2014?

    Hi! Does anyone have a news about new version of BPA for SQL Server?

    Hi,
    The latest version of Best Practices Analyzer for SQL Server is SQL Server 2012 Best Practices Analyzer.
    You can download it from
    http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=29302
    I will update this thread when there is any update for SQL Server 2014 version.
    Thanks.
    Tracy Cai
    TechNet Community Support

  • Best Practice Analyzer for Exchange 2013

    Greetings,
    I have upgraded the messaging infrastructure from Exchange 2007 to Exchange 2013.
    I want to test the Health of the system through ExBPA for Exchange 2013.
    But i don't find any setup for Exchange 2013 like it was in 2010.
    I went through an article by Office365 community, according to which for In-premises Exchange also we need to have office 365 account (can use trial account also) to get the downloader file for ExBPA 2013.
    http://community.office365.com/en-us/w/deploy/office-365-best-practices-analyzer-for-exchange-server-2013.aspx
    But to run the setup the servers needs to be connected to internet.
    And, i don't want to expose my environment to internet in any condition.
    Somebody, please suggest me if there is any setup available so that i can install directly without exposing to internet.
    Thanks in advance.
    Best Regards,
    K2

    Welcome to Exchange 2013.
    Exchange Server 2013 doesn't come with ExBPA for health check. This might help
    http://exchangeserverpro.com/powershell-script-health-check-report-exchange-2010/
    Apart from that you can run these commands too
    Get-ServerHealth -Identity Exchange2013ServerName
    Test-ServiceHealth
    Cheers,
    Gulab Prasad
    Technology Consultant
    Blog:
    http://www.exchangeranger.com    Twitter:
      LinkedIn:
       Check out CodeTwo’s tools for Exchange admins
    Note: Posts are provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, including but not limited to the implied warranties of merchantability and/or fitness for a particular purpose.

  • High availability for file server and exchange with 2 physical servers

    Dear Experts,
    I have 2 physical server with local disks only. I want to setup below on same with high availability, please advise best prossible options. We will be using windows 2012 R2 Server..
    1. Domain controller
    2. Exchange 2013
    As of now I am thinking of setting up below:
    1. Install Hyper-v on both and create 3 VM on each as
    -On Host A- 1 VM for DC, 1 VM for File server with DFS namespace and replication for file server HA and 1 VM for Exchange 2013 with CAS/MBX with DAG and DNS RR for Exchange HA
    -On Host B - 1 VM for ADC, 1 VM for File server DFS member for above and 1 VM for Exchange 2013 CAS/MBX with DAG member
    I have read on internet about new features called scale out file server (SoFS) in Windows 2012 Server but not sure that will be preferred for file sharing.
    Any advise will be highly appreciated..
    Thanks for the help in advance..
    Best regards,

    Dear Experts,
    I have 2 physical server with local disks only. I want to setup below on same with high availability, please advise best prossible options. We will be using windows 2012 R2 Server..
    1. Domain controller
    2. Exchange 2013
    As of now I am thinking of setting up below:
    1. Install Hyper-v on both and create 3 VM on each as
    -On Host A- 1 VM for DC, 1 VM for File server with DFS namespace and replication for file server HA and 1 VM for Exchange 2013 with CAS/MBX with DAG and DNS RR for Exchange HA
    -On Host B - 1 VM for ADC, 1 VM for File server DFS member for above and 1 VM for Exchange 2013 CAS/MBX with DAG member
    I have read on internet about new features called scale out file server (SoFS) in Windows 2012 Server but not sure that will be preferred for file sharing.
    Any advise will be highly appreciated..
    Thanks for the help in advance..
    Best regards,
    DFS is by far the best way to implement any sort of file server. Because a) failover is not fully transparent and does not happen always (say not on copy ) b) DFS cannot replicate open files so if you edit a big file and have node rebooted you're going to
    lose ALL transactions/updates you've applied c) actually slows down the config. See:
    DFS for failover
    http://help.globalscape.com/help/wafs3/using_microsoft_dfs_for_failover.htm
    DFS FAQ
    http://technet.microsoft.com/library/cc773238(WS.10).aspx
    (check "open files" point here)
    DFS Performance
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/filecab/archive/2009/08/22/windows-server-dfs-namespaces-performance-and-scalability.aspx
    SoFS a) requires shared storage to run and you don't have one b) does not support generic workloads
    (only Hyper-V and SQL Server) and c) technically makes sense to expand SAS JBOD or existing FC SAN to numerous Hyper-V clients over 10 GbE w/o need to invest money into SAS switches and HBAs and FC HBAs and new licenses FC ports. Making long story short:
    SoFS is NOT YOUR CASE. 
    SoFS Overview
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh831349.aspx
    http://www.aidanfinn.com/?p=12786
    http://www.aidanfinn.com/?p=12786
    For now you need to find some shared storage to be a back end for your hypevisor config (SAS JBOD from supported list, virtual SAN from multiple vendors like for example StarWind see below, make sure you review ALL the vendors) and then you create a failover
    SMB 3.0 share for your file server workload. See:
    Clustered Storage Spaces over SAS JBOD
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj822937.aspx
    Virtual SAN from inexpensive SATA and no SAS or FC
    http://www.starwindsoftware.com/native-san-for-hyper-v-free-edition
    Failover
    SMB File Server in Windows Server 2012 R2
    http://www.starwindsoftware.com/configuring-ha-file-server-on-windows-server-2012-for-smb-nas
    Fault
    tolerant file server on just a pair of nodes
    http://www.starwindsoftware.com/ns-configuring-ha-file-server-for-smb-nas
    For Exchange you use SMB share from above for a file share witness and use DAG. See:
    Exchange DAG
    Good luck! Hope this helped :)
    StarWind VSAN [Virtual SAN] clusters Hyper-V without SAS, Fibre Channel, SMB 3.0 or iSCSI, uses Ethernet to mirror internally mounted SATA disks between hosts.

  • Selecting VHDx as storage for File Server Role (Failover Cluster 2012 R2)

    Is it possible to select an already existing (offline) VHD or VHDX as storage when creating the "File Server" role? Reason I want to do that is because I already have a file server setup as a virtual machine and causing issues so my company
    decided to make the change towards a File Server role.
    Thank you
    David

    Hi David,
    Do you mean you configured it to file server failover cluster via "High Availability Wizard" ?
    I think you need to choose a shared volume between two nodes to achieve high availability .
    Please refer to following link :
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc731844(v=WS.10).aspx
    If you do not select a shared volume , I think there is no difference than sharing a mounted VHDX file on a standalone file server .
    I would suggest to copy these files to CSV and share them .
    Hope it helps
    Best Regards
    Elton Ji
    We
    are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
    interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
    Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

  • No more connections available to this remote computer...Urgent Help for File server...

    Hi Guys,
    I need urgent help regards to our school File server which is having "No more connection to this remote computer error"
    on SMB Shares where I usually authenticate with a domain username it used to work fine since till 3 weeks ago.
    Now I can browse the SMB shares with only IP... Netbios gets straight away this error message from non-domain joined pc's where the computer needs to connect to the SCCM distribution point on this file server.
    Strangely, Domain joined pc's does not have this problem at all they can use Netbios or IP no problem at all. But someone from a standalone laptop or desktop who needs to access shares through netbios gets this message.
    Can someone help me please?
    I did check DNS yet there is no problem on DNS I checked PTR record for the server to make sure it is not turned in to multihome accidently but nothing at all.
    I also did a NETMON where I captured the data from server and the client I get these errors:
    205 4:54:35 PM 16/12/2013
    7.3299179 10.2.1.96
    10.2.0.13 TCP
    TCP:Flags=......S., SrcPort=49312, DstPort=Microsoft-DS(445), PayloadLen=0, Seq=1771710719, Ack=0, Win=8192 ( Negotiating scale factor 0x2 ) = 8192
    {TCP:22, IPv4:21}
    206 4:54:35 PM 16/12/2013
    7.3299668 10.2.0.13
    10.2.1.96 TCP
    TCP:Flags=...A..S., SrcPort=Microsoft-DS(445), DstPort=49312, PayloadLen=0, Seq=2167618331, Ack=1771710720, Win=8192 ( Negotiated scale factor 0x8 ) = 2097152
    {TCP:22, IPv4:21}
    207 4:54:35 PM 16/12/2013
    7.3301468 10.2.1.96
    10.2.0.13 TCP
    TCP:Flags=...A...., SrcPort=49312, DstPort=Microsoft-DS(445), PayloadLen=0, Seq=1771710720, Ack=2167618332, Win=16425 (scale factor 0x2) = 65700
    {TCP:22, IPv4:21}
    208 4:54:35 PM 16/12/2013
    7.3301468 10.2.1.96
    10.2.0.13 SMB
    SMB:C; Negotiate, Dialect = PC NETWORK PROGRAM 1.0, LANMAN1.0, Windows for Workgroups 3.1a, LM1.2X002, LANMAN2.1, NT LM 0.12, SMB 2.002, SMB 2.???
    {SMBOverTCP:23, TCP:22, IPv4:21}
    209 4:54:35 PM 16/12/2013
    7.3307974 10.2.0.13
    10.2.1.96 SMB2
    SMB2:R   NEGOTIATE (0x0), GUID={8447F237-5219-D48A-40C0-29092450C68E}
    {SMBOverTCP:23, TCP:22, IPv4:21}
    210 4:54:35 PM 16/12/2013
    7.3314064 10.2.1.96
    10.2.0.13 SMB2
    SMB2:C   SESSION SETUP (0x1) {SMBOverTCP:23, TCP:22, IPv4:21}
    211 4:54:35 PM 16/12/2013
    7.3318815 10.2.0.13
    10.2.1.96 SMB2
    SMB2:R  - NT Status: System - Error, Code = (22) STATUS_MORE_PROCESSING_REQUIRED  SESSION SETUP (0x1), SessionFlags=0x0
    {SMBOverTCP:23, TCP:22, IPv4:21}
    212 4:54:35 PM 16/12/2013
    7.3324012 10.2.1.96
    10.2.0.13 SMB2
    SMB2:C   SESSION SETUP (0x1) {SMBOverTCP:23, TCP:22, IPv4:21}
    215 4:54:35 PM 16/12/2013
    7.3339977 10.2.0.13
    10.2.1.96 SMB2
    SMB2:R  - NT Status: System - Error, Code = (109) STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE  SESSION SETUP (0x1)  
    {SMBOverTCP:23, TCP:22, IPv4:21}
    216 4:54:35 PM 16/12/2013
    7.3341805 10.2.1.96
    10.2.0.13 TCP
    TCP:Flags=...A.R.., SrcPort=49312, DstPort=Microsoft-DS(445), PayloadLen=0, Seq=1771711788, Ack=2167619070, Win=0 (scale factor 0x2) = 0
    {TCP:22, IPv4:21}
    217 4:54:35 PM 16/12/2013
    7.3357089 10.2.1.96
    10.2.0.13 TCP
    TCP:Flags=......S., SrcPort=49313, DstPort=Microsoft-DS(445), PayloadLen=0, Seq=2943201172, Ack=0, Win=8192 ( Negotiating scale factor 0x2 ) = 8192
    {TCP:27, IPv4:21}
    218 4:54:35 PM 16/12/2013
    7.3357422 10.2.0.13
    10.2.1.96 TCP
    TCP:Flags=...A..S., SrcPort=Microsoft-DS(445), DstPort=49313, PayloadLen=0, Seq=3718656547, Ack=2943201173, Win=8192 ( Negotiated scale factor 0x8 ) = 2097152
    {TCP:27, IPv4:21}
    219 4:54:35 PM 16/12/2013
    7.3359768 10.2.1.96
    10.2.0.13 TCP
    TCP:Flags=...A...., SrcPort=49313, DstPort=Microsoft-DS(445), PayloadLen=0, Seq=2943201173, Ack=3718656548, Win=16425 (scale factor 0x2) = 65700
    {TCP:27, IPv4:21}
    220 4:54:35 PM 16/12/2013
    7.3359768 10.2.1.96
    10.2.0.13 SMB2
    SMB2:C   NEGOTIATE (0x0), GUID={8213462D-2600-D1B1-11E3-65FC4BCDE707}
    {SMBOverTCP:28, TCP:27, IPv4:21}
    221 4:54:35 PM 16/12/2013
    7.3364173 10.2.0.13
    10.2.1.96 SMB2
    SMB2:R   NEGOTIATE (0x0), GUID={8447F237-5219-D48A-40C0-29092450C68E}
    {SMBOverTCP:28, TCP:27, IPv4:21}
    222 4:54:35 PM 16/12/2013
    7.3369702 10.2.1.96
    10.2.0.13 SMB2
    SMB2:C   SESSION SETUP (0x1) {SMBOverTCP:28, TCP:27, IPv4:21}
    223 4:54:35 PM 16/12/2013
    7.3373474 10.2.0.13
    10.2.1.96 SMB2
    SMB2:R  - NT Status: System - Error, Code = (22) STATUS_MORE_PROCESSING_REQUIRED  SESSION SETUP (0x1), SessionFlags=0x0
    {SMBOverTCP:28, TCP:27, IPv4:21}
    224 4:54:35 PM 16/12/2013
    7.3377060 10.2.1.96
    10.2.0.13 SMB2
    SMB2:C   SESSION SETUP (0x1) {SMBOverTCP:28, TCP:27, IPv4:21}
    227 4:54:35 PM 16/12/2013
    7.3390552 10.2.0.13
    10.2.1.96 SMB2
    SMB2:R  - NT Status: System - Error, Code = (109) STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE  SESSION SETUP (0x1)  
    {SMBOverTCP:28, TCP:27, IPv4:21}
    Regards,
    Gokhan

    Solution has been found, 
    After doing bit of a backtrack, site DC's were out of sync with PDC with time.
    Also Time service was shutdown on PDC which has been enabled and pointed to the Australian pool ntp IP address.
    Everything is back on track now.
    Regards,
    Gokhan Cil

  • Best set up for file transfers?

    I am currently running a G4 Dual 533 as a file server and have placed my music, videos, and photos on it. I am set up via airport cards for wireless connections my issue is that this seems to be a very slow transfer speed. Even Itunes seems to have problems playing music without hiccuping. Is this due to the airport card in the G4 being the lowest transfer speed?
    JJ

    Are you using Apple's Airport card? The internal Airport cards are 802.11b @ 11Mbps. You could get a PCI extreme wireless card with 802.11g @ 54Mbps.
     Cheers, Tom

  • Mini vs iMac vs MacPro for file server?

    I need a machine to serve as a home server and do some video encoding on the side (my dvd collection). As this machine would remain running 24x7, would the mini be the best choice because of low power consumption? Maybe the imac for more internal staorage available? I have a MacPro as my main machine but not sure I want to a server and client running on the same machine?

    JaimieV wrote:
    For use as a home server and video encoder, a Mini is a great choice (although your Pro would be an awful lot quicker at the encoding!).
    I agree.
    You don't need to buy the Server version of the Mini, adding external hard drives is far more cost effective, so unless there are features of OS X Server that you actually need stick with the normal version. Plus you probably want the DVD drive.
    Far more cost effective?
    2.66 GHz Mac Mini with 8GB of RAM (since you'll want to max out the RAM for your video work), a 500GB internal HDD @ 5400 RPM, and an internal SuperDrive: $1449 from Apple's online store
    2.66 GHz Mac Mini Server with 8GB of RAM, 2x500GB internal HDD storage @ 7200 RPM (which will speed things up further; the extra RPM isn't just for show), and an external SuperDrive: $1498 from Apple's online store
    Even if you were to get the normal Mini's 320GB HDD and make up the difference with a 1TB external HDD, you'd basically still arrive at the price of a Mac Mini Server with the above listed options (and this is assuming you'd even NEED an external DVD drive for the Server; I've been doing fine without so far, using my MBP as my Server's SuperDrive when needed), and with 320GB of your storage at a slower access speed than what you'd get with the Server. Not to mention that this is not even including the price difference of Snow Leopard Server vs. Snow Leopard Client + bundled iLife.
    So not only is this certainly not far more cost effective, one could argue it is, in the end, *more expensive*!

  • Backup not working for File Server

    We have System Center 2012 Sp1 installed with Agent Version : 4.1.3453.0
    We are protecting File Server which is member in DFS. We have Volume of More than 2TB and which is spanned accross multiple VHDs.
    I am facing problem with Backup not working and DPMRA service is getting stopped unexpectedly. When i try to create recovery point manually i don't get option to syncrhonize the changes. 1st and 3rd option is geryed out.
    I am getting Error on DPM as Affected area:    E:\
    Description:    The replica of Volume E:\ on<ServerName> is inconsistent with the protected data source. All protection activities for data source will fail until the replica is synchronized with consistency check. You can recover data
    from existing recovery points, but new recovery points cannot be created until the replica is consistent.
    For SharePoint farm, recovery points will continue getting created with the databases that are consistent. To backup inconsistent databases, run a consistency check on the farm. (ID 3106)
        DPM failed to communicate with the protection agent on <Server> because the agent is not responding. (ID 43 Details: Internal error code: 0x8099090E)
        More information
    Recommended action:    1) Check recent records from the DPMRA source in the Application Event Log on FUSE.win2k.internal to find out why the agent failed to respond.
    2) Make sure that the DPM server is remotely accessible from <Server>
    3) If a firewall is enabled on the DPM server, make sure that it is not blocking requests from <Server>
    4) Restart the DPM Protection Agent service on <Server>. If the service fails to start, re-install the protection agent.
        Synchronize with consistency check.
        Run a synchronization job with consistency check...
    Resolution:    To dismiss the alert, click below
        Inactivate
    I have Re-installed Agent but it is not helping.
    I have Other Volume labeled as F: and sized at 600 GB. Backup of that Volume is working fine for Same server.
    Please Suggest how to troubleshoot.
    Thanks in Advance.
    Swapnil
    Thanks, Swapnil Prajapati

    HI Chris,
    Sharing files using Bluetooth
    To share files using Bluetooth, you first need to make sure Bluetooth is turned on, and then use Bluetooth File Exchange to send a file.
    To turn on Bluetooth:
    Choose Apple menu > System Preferences and click Bluetooth.
    Select the On checkbox. To allow other Bluetooth enabled devices to “discover” your computer and send files, also select the Discoverable checkbox.
    Select “Show Bluetooth status in the menu bar” so you can quickly send files and perform other actions using the Bluetooth status menu in the menu bar.
    To send files using Bluetooth:
    Choose Send File from the Bluetooth status menu in the menu bar.
    If the Bluetooth menu isn’t visible, choose Apple menu > System Preferences, click Bluetooth, and select “Show Bluetooth status in the menu bar.”
    In the window that appears, select the file you want to send and click Send.
    Select the device you want to send the file to and click Send.
    If you don’t see the device you want to send the file to, make sure the device has Bluetooth turned on and is discoverable.
    You do not need File Sharing turned on for Bluetooth technology.
    Another way to share files between two Macs is How to use Firewire Target Disk Mode
    Carolyn

  • Suggestions for File Server?

    I've got a small architecture office with six Macs - one is a white iMac G5 (wired) that's set up as the file server for the others. The system is sometimes slow to load our CAD files (300MB ones are understandable, but 15 minutes to open a 30MB file from the server is crazy).
    I'm wondering what the fastest file server setup is going to be (even if it means getting another machine). I'm told a USB Network Attached Drive (NAD) hung off my Airport Extreme or switch/hub won't allow file sharing, and would just give each user separate folders - is that true?
    I thought about Time Capsule, but am told it can't also be a wired (thereby faster) server.
    Is there a way to figure out where the bottleneck is (ethernet vs. computer)?
    Thanks for any thoughts.

    Hi Erick Mikiten-
    More free space or a larger hard drive on that dedicated mac would probably help a bit.
    Macs generally do connect at the fastest possible speed, unless of course there is something to prevent them from doing so. Generally the internal wiring of a facility is often to blame, as are the jumper canbles used to connect each machine to the wall.
    A gig switch might help quite a bit, assuming your wiring is all at least Cat 5e.
    A dedicated server can be a machine not being used for something else as described. I was just trying to clarify. That machine connected to an external FireWire drive and communicating via gig ethernet should provide a fairly snappy setup.
    Luck-
    -DaddyPaycheck

  • Smart folders for file server

    A while back I got very excited about Spotlight and created some Smart folders to display my PNG, PSD and FLA files that live on our file server.
    Problem is that that when I click on them, they take ages to load. I assume Spotlight is not indexing the file server. If that's the case, can Smart folders ever been of any practical use for me?

    Hi, Paul.
    Spotlight neither works nor plays well with server / network-attached / shared volumes. See my recent post here for details.
    Good luck!
    Dr. Smoke
    Author: Troubleshooting Mac® OS X

  • IMac freezes at login screen for file server

    The machine: iMac (lampshade), OS 10.3.9
    The symptom: During the boot/login sequence, the machine locks up at the login screen to the file server.
    If I disconnect the network cable during the boot sequence, it will error but not freeze; I can later reconnect the cable and login without a problem.
    Any ideas?
    James

    You may want to look at this similar post:
    http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=690609&#690609
    Heres what Mac Help said.
    Open System Preferences and click Startup Disk.
    If necessary, click the lock icon and type the name and password for an administrator user.
    Click the icon of the system folder or system volume that you want to use, then click Restart.
    IMPORTANT: When selecting a network startup volume, be sure you select a valid network startup volume and not a network install image. Choosing a network install image reinstalls your system software and may erase the contents of your hard disk. A standard network volume icon appears as a globe and Mac OS X system folder. When you select a network volume icon, a message appears in the Startup pane describing the volume. A network install icon appears as a globe with downward pointing green arrow.
    Another way to select a startup disk is to hold down the Option key as you restart your computer. You'll see the available startup disks and can select one.
    If your computer is on a network and a network startup volume is available, you can start up from the network startup volume by holding down the N key as you restart your computer.

  • Best Practise to lock down server 2012 for Junior Admins

    We require locking down the desktop for junior admins. Essentially we would like for them to only access specific tools and applications.
    Below are examples of specific tools they would require access to however, if we want to block out everything else then what is the best way to go about that? I would image a combination of group rights? how best to handle this?
    Examples
    All Programs->Accessories->System Tools->System Information. then export report.
    "ipconfig /all
    go to Run and then type "systeminfo" and capture all data.

    You can use security group and delegation of administration model.
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc755982(v=WS.10).aspx
    Santhosh Sivarajan | Houston, TX | www.sivarajan.com
    ITIL,MCITP,MCTS,MCSE (W2K3/W2K/NT4),MCSA(W2K3/W2K/MSG),Network+,CCNA
    Windows Server 2012 Book - Migrating from 2008 to Windows Server 2012
    Blogs: Blogs
    Twitter: Twitter
    LinkedIn: LinkedIn
    Facebook: Facebook
    Microsoft Virtual Academy:
    Microsoft Virtual Academy
    This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no rights.

  • Error while adding file share for File Server role

    I'm getting this error when trying to add a file share on a Server 2012 R2 failover cluster:
    "Unable to retrieve all data needed to run the wizard. Error details: Cannot retrieve information from server. Error occurred during enumeration of SMB shares: WinRM cannot complete the operation. Verify that the specified computer name is valid, that
    the computer is accessible over the network, and that a firewall exception for the WinRM service is enabled and allows access from this computer. By default, the WinRM firewall exception for public profiles limits access to remote comptuers within the same
    local subnet."
    Despite the message, I can still create the share and it seems to work, but I'm concerned there may be an issue and I'd like to resolve it before putting the service into production. TIA!

    Hi,
    Your error often caused by the WinRM can’t communication to the others node, please confirm all the node “Windows Remote Management” service is running or try to disable your
    firewall and AV soft then monitor it again.
    More information:
    WinRM (Windows Remote Management) Troubleshooting
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/jonjor/archive/2009/01/09/winrm-windows-remote-management-troubleshooting.aspx
    WINRM
    http://blogs.msdn.com/b/powershell/archive/2007/10/30/winrm-exe.aspx
    Installation and Configuration for Windows Remote Management
    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa384372(v=vs.85).aspx
    Hope this helps.
    We
    are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
    interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
    Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

  • Best Practise Documents for Oil & Gas Industries

    Dear Experts,
    I am looking for SAP Best Practice documents on Oil & Gas Industry.
    Any useful link or file will be highly appreciated!
    Regards,
    Zain M. Bashir

    Hi Zain,
    Apparently there are no such documents available. You may refer the SAP documentation on IS OIL
    which is exhaustive and elaborated.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_oil46csp2/helpdata/en/67/bfa73ad9ccf101e10000000a11402f/frameset.htm
    Regards,

Maybe you are looking for

  • Filter issues with hidden/visible  columns on a table

    OK, 1st post to this forum: This is based on: http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/spry/samples/data_region/SpryPagedViewSample.html I have a contact list that has contact info on it (office phone, home phone, cell phone, etc). There are several hundre

  • Error 'endOfSession ' whil opening communication channel in RWD

    Hi All, In the activity of Communication Channel Monitoring, Im getting the error 'endOfSession'  while I was trying to open a Communication Channel.  But I can't see any problem with Message monitoring. What could be the problem. Can any body help m

  • Messed about by BT

    Evening all, I just wanted to vent a little about my experience so far with BT. On the 3rd October I made the decision to go with BT for the new property I was going to be moving into. A good internet connection is essential for me as I often work re

  • Can't create outboud delivery against new SO type

    Dear Experts, I created SO type via VOV8 & assign the item category via Sales & Distribution - Sales - Sales Document - Sales Document Item - Assign Item Category. Then I create a Sales Order via VA01 & then create Outbound Delivery via VL01N. Error

  • Incorrect decimal output

    Hi ALL, we recently had a requirement where the unit price needed to be change from 2 decimal to 4 decimal. we have defined a variable int he global defination with 4 decimal and printing the same in the form but the output i.e decimal places is prin