Best upgrades for under $100

I suppose it's my turn to ask a few basic questions. Someone gave me a Beige G3 desktop. It has a 300 mhz processor. And it has OS x 10.2.8 The only upgrade I have done has been to put in one 256 ram chip. I would like to make a few other upgrades to it, but not for very much money since I also have a mac mini that I use primarily. The G3 is used mostly as an extra computer for family to jump online with. It also has it's original 6 Gig hard-drive of which 4 gigs are used. I have a few different questions and perhaps someone could point me towards the right post, if they have been asked (I couldn't find them on my own).
1. I was interested in getting the larger vram chip for it, but after reading one of the posts, it was recomended to get a graphics card instead. Will a pci card just bypass the vram? In other words, do I just pick up a graphics/video card and forget the internal vram exists?
2. Here is a little more wide open question. If you were in my shoes and you wanted to make important upgrades for a total of about $100, what would be your "no-brainer" prioritized list? I have been looking for a list of prioritized upgrades, but haven't found any.
Thanks to any who reply.
G3 Beige Desktop 300 mhz   Mac OS X (10.2.x)  

Since this is a secondary computer, and because its market value is negligible, I wouldn't recommend a processor upgrade. The stock 300 MHz (with 1 MB L2 cache) processor is certainly more than adequate for your expressed usage. Having enough RAM for running OS X is necessary, so the additional 256 MB DIMM that you added to the existing memory (? MBs) may be enough. The motherboard has a slot for a 2 MB or 4 MB SGRAM SO-DIMM for graphics enhancement. Used pulls are available at eBay for $5 now plus shipping. As for video cards, a Mac can use multiple cards for multiple displays (if desired), so (unlike PCs) you don't need to use the "Device Manager" or go into the BIOS setup to disable the onboard graphics chip. The video card must be Mac-compatible, meaning that it's programmed with a Mac ROM. Used Mac cards are available on eBay for $30 and under, like ATI's Radeon 7000 or the Rage Pro 128 for under $20. A graphics card with a faster onboard processor will provide faster screen redraws, and will be an asset, especially if the Mac will be connected to high-speed internet. Any of the widely-available IDE (E-IDE) hard drives sold in computer/electronics/office supply stores can be used in the beige G3, so if storage capacity is needed, you can get a new drive for around $40 or less (with or without rebates). Beyond the extra disk space, new drives run cooler, faster, and have larger caches. Even on the stock ATA bus, you'll notice a speed/performance difference. The onboard controller can't recognize any drive greater than 137 GBs, so that means that a 120 GB (or less) is the target size to purchase. You can install a larger capacity drive, but anything beyond 128 GBs of formatted space will be unrecognized/unused. A USB PCI card is a convenient add-on, especially if you'd like to use current printers, flash drives, scanners, etc. with your beige G3. Avoid the Belkin cards having the Opti-based chipset. I've had no problems with the IOGEAR 2-port USB 2.0 card. In order of priority, I'd place memory first (which you've done), a graphics card second, a larger capacity hard drive third, and a USB PCI card fourth. You may also want to consider replacing the stock 24x CD-ROM drive with a CD-RW drive, but with a USB flash memory stick, files could be transferred to the Mac Mini for burning to CD, so that probably wouldn't be needed. I will point out that I upgraded my beige G3s with RAM, a Radeon graphics card, USB and FireWire cards, CD-RW drive, and larger capacity hard drives in some. I couldn't begin to recover the total investment in each unit, if I sold any of them today. If you set a $$ limit before upgrading, you'll keep from going overboard.

Similar Messages

  • Which would be the best upgrade for the money?

    Here is my situation:
    My school has a six year life cycle for macs, and we have a 2006 Mac Pro (1,1) that is reaching the end of its useful life. I had recently tried Final Cut Pro X and it pains me to say that it took 4 hours to export a 14 minute 720p video. This mac is used for our school news and has to be a beast video editing machine. We have been saving money for quite some time and can now afford a decent upgrade. So my question to you is which would be the best upgrade for the money: a 21.5 inch iMac with an i7, 8gb RAM, and Fusion drive or the cheapest Mac Pro with after market SSD? This mac needs to be the fastest at Final Cut Pro X and able to usefully last us another 6 years. Please help I am forever perplexed with this!

    Id go for the I7 with minimum 8 Gig ram and as much SSD as your money will buy.
    It's not only about having a fast CPU but just as important is to get the data in and out as fast a possible.
    Without a real fast drive your CPU will spend a lot of time just waiting for the data to get to it and then wait more time while it has to write back to the drive.
    You can always add a slower drive for archiving and large amounts storage.
    Cheers!

  • Best scanner for around $100

    Hi,
    Is there a good scanner for around $100?
    Thank you

    Hi, Forestman. Epson's Perfection 3490 lists for $100 at Epson's own online store, can be had for a few dollars less from some other vendors (and, strangely, for considerably more than list from others), and has been very favorably reviewed.
    Few publications or web sites do side-by-side comparison testing of really inexpensive scanners (under $100), probably because few buyers of really inexpensive scanners are critical enough to understand or care about the details. My own experience with other inexpensive Epson models has been uniformly excellent, but I haven't used a 3490 myself.
    Epson's TWAIN scanning software is easy to understand and use, though of course it's less powerful than stand-alone professional-level scanning applications that I've used. I'm not familiar with the other software that comes bundled with the 3490. Epson really understands the Mac, unlike some other scanner makers (particularly HP, which is clueless) and can offer meaningful tech support.

  • Best soundcard to get for under 100 dolla

    can someone tell me what is the best soundcard to get for no more than 00 dollars?. Thank you very much.

    bboyflames wrote:
    can someone tell me what is the best soundcard to get for no more than 00 dollars?. Thank you very much.
    Depends on what are you goin' to do w/ that card.
    Could you list some requirements too?
    jutapa

  • K8N Neo2 Platinum - Best CPU upgrade for under £200 please?

    Hi there,
    I currently have an AMD Athlon 64 3500+ 2.2ghz running on this board. The BIOS is the latest etc. I am now wanting to upgrade the CPU on this. I run everything at normal settings... don't overclock etc.
    Not sure what I can go to with it and was wondering if anyone can advise please?
    Budget for CPU upgrade is £200... any help would be very much appreciated.
    Thanks in advance,
    Gazza.
    PS: Not sure if other specs are required but here goes:
    2 X 512MB PC3200 184 pin DDR400 (was thinking of just buying another 2 x 512MB)
    2 x 80GB Segate SATA HDD 8MB CACHE (was thinking of buying a Seagate Barracuda 320GB SATA HDD 16MB CACHE)
    256MB Radeon X800XT Platimun AGP Graphics Card (keeping this)

    Quote from: WaltC on 27-December-06, 10:36:15
    Check out this very brief thread of mine:
    http://80.190.215.245/index.php?topic=103825.0
    ...If your 3500 is a 90nm San Diego core, there's really nothing new for you there.
    If it's an earlier core, though, you might have difficulty in supporting all four 512mb DIMMs at 200/400MHz.  The San Diego 3700+ core I just bought to replace my 130 nm A64 4000+ has the same 1mb L2 cache as the A4000+ it replaced, but an improved memory controller which will support 4 double-sided 512mb DIMMs in this motherboard at full speed of 400MHz DDR.  The 3700+ is 90nm, and is simply generally a better core in terms of errata, power consumption, and, if you ever feel the need to experiment, overclocking.  I would imagine you should be able to pick one up at < 200 pounds, your cost (my keyboard doesn't have a "pound" key...)
    My last post in the thread mentions what bios version you should run with this cpu.
    Also, unlike the Newcastle or Winchester A3500+ cores, the A3700+ San Diego 90nm core supports SSE3 intructions.  Here's an article you might care to read describing some differences between the A3500+ Newcastle and Winchester cores:
    http://www.hothardware.com/viewarticle.aspx?articleid=613&cid=1
    Here's a current link to the 3700+ cpu for sale:
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.asp?DEPA=0&type=&Description=A64+3700%2B+Retail&Submit=ENE&N=0&Ntk=all&Go.x=0&Go.y=0
    Many thanks for your reply, much appreciated. However a lot of that has just gone right over my head I'm afraid :(
    Do I have to strip the PC to find out which processor I have? The invoice I still have for the PC does not state what type it was. This was not a home built PC and was purchased from an online store in the UK.
    I have a list from the MSI site of processors that this MB is supposed to take. Am I right in saying that I could install an AMD Athlon 64 X2 4600+ Skt939 2.4Ghz 512KB Processor?
    Once again many thanks for your help.
    Gazza.

  • What is the best upgrade for the new Air?

    I am looking for a new Macbook Air for college and was wondering what upgrade would be the smartest decision. I was thinking of a 13" air with:
    1.7GHz Dual-Core Intel Core i7, Turbo Boost up to 3.3GHz
    8GB 1600MHz LPDDR3 SDRAM
    128GB PCIe-based Flash Storage
    or a 13" Air with:
    1.4GHz dual-core Intel Core i5 processor
    Turbo Boost up to 2.7GHz
    8 GB memory
    256GB PCIe-based flash storage1
    The former option would save me approximately $60. What are the benefits of an upgraded processor? I have heard they would make my computer overheat more easily and the fan would be significantly louder. This is making me question if the processor is worth it. In addition, I am unsure of how beneficial the 8GB as opposed to 4GB of RAM would be. How can I optimize the speed of my laptop if I want to run Windows through Parallels? That is essential.
    Please advise, Thanks.

    If you buy a 2013 model you can save up to $400+ from online resellers who are clearing out the "old" model.
    However the "old" model is nearly 100% identical in performance .
    to answer your question, unless you plan on gaming or video editing, get the I5 with 8GB of RAM with 256 SSD

  • Best upgrade for mini to improve live broadcast streaming?

    I am using a Mac Mini for live broadcast streaming. I am using Wirecast for the encoding. I am encoding the stream in Flash format and I'm simultaneously recording to hard drive in QT h.264 format. This maxes out my 2 GHz Core 2 Duo mini with 4GB RAM. I am trying to decide how I might improve my setup for optimal performance. For example:
    1) Should I replace the 5400 RPM internal hard drive in the Mini with a 7200 RPM drive and continue to run the broadcasting and recording as before but now with the faster drive? In other words, would I expect meaningful gain by simply upgrading to a faster internal drive?
    Or:
    2) Should I add an external 7200 RPM 800 Firewire HD to the Mini? If I do this what would be the best way to utilize the faster drive--
    a) Booting the mini from the faster external drive and recording to the external drive and essentially "ignore" the internal drive?
    b) Boot from the internal drive and use the external drive for recording the movies?
    And would utilizing the single FW 800 port for the HD interfere with capturing video from my FW camcorder? (I'd need to add a FW hub or daisy chain the two devices).
    I guess what I am really asking is this-- Will I have better efficiency in performing simultaneous encoding and recording by off-loading part of the work to a second hard drive?
    I assume that the encoding of the broadcast stream is determined by the CPU and is independent of the hard drive configuration.
    Any suggestions will be appreciated.
    John

    I admit that I'm not familiar with your particular application and setup, but I will say that the fastest connection to the hard drive in the Mini is via the internal SATA. A 7200 RPM 2.5" drive should be faster than a firewire external.
    Keep in mind that drives slow down as they get closer to full .. so for best performance try to keep as much free space as possible. A drive that is 50% full will be a lot faster than one that is 80-90% full.
    It might be useful to look at Utilities > Activity Monitor and see whether you are having a high pageout-to-pagein ratio, or whether you are strictly CPU or I/O bound.
    BTW to take advantage of the fast SATA connection, some folks have run eSata from inside their Minis to allow connection of 3.5" eSata drives, which would be the fastest conventional drive for a Mini.
    Others have replaced the DVD drive with a Solid-State Disk Drive, for the absolute fastest (though size limited) setup.

  • Best Monitor for Under $500

    I'm looking to pick up a new monitor for the office and I was given a budget of $500 to work with. Obviously, this excludes the best models available, but 
    I should still be able to find something decent. Any help is appreciated.
    Here are my requirements.
    1. Cost must be under $500
    2. Good color accuracy. I'm a graphic designer, so this is very important.
    3. 22" or bigger.
    4. 1920 x 1080 or better
    5. Wide viewing angle.
    6. Good contrast ratio
    7. Good overall sharpness. I do not want grainy whites.
    8. Glossy or matte screen is fine.
    More details
    1. Well lit office environment (fluorescent lighting).
    2. LED or LCD. Either option is fine. Looking for the best overall quality regardless of technology.
    3. Gaming performance / response time is not important. This will only be used for design work.
    Models under consideration
    1. HP 2310m
    2. Samsung SyncMaster F2380M (It seems to no longer available)
    3. HP 2311x
    4. HP ZR24W
    5. Dell UltraSharp U2410 (poor quality control)
    Are there any other good models that I am leaving out?

    I can only say that I have three F2380's (without the M) and even while they are not up to IPS monitors, they are way better than TN monitors, meet all the other requirements you stated and IMO they do deliver a very, very nice price / performance ratio.

  • Best upgrades for MacBook Pro Late 2011

    Hello, searching in the community, only brings me to posts that are from 2012, as newer tech is available, I would like to renew the question and hopefully get some updated comments and suggestions.
    I own a MacBook Pro 15 late 2011 (2,2GHz Intel Core i7, 4GB 1333 MHz DDR3, matte retina display, Intel HD Graphics 3000 384 MB, OS X 10.9.5 13F34).
    I would like to upgrade to Mavericks and while I'm at it, I'll upgrade the hardware as well (HD and RAM).
    I'm a photographer, and I noticed that Lightroom and PS are running slower as I upgraded through the OSs, this is the main reason for my need to upgrade, I would like more speed overall. There are so many choices of SSDs and RAMs on the net, I would love to get some good feedback from this post and maybe boil this down to three upgrade possibilities:
    1 The BEST (meaning the top of the line and probably most expensive)
    2 The MID (good compromise between price and performance)
    3 The CHEAP (the least expensive choice to make the computer increase performance)
    I really appreciate all the help I can get from the Community.
    Marco Benvenuto
    P.S.
    If by any chance I missed a post that already answered my question, please link it to this one ;-)

    I just bought the Crucial M550 CT512M550SSD1!!! Thank you so much for your help
    If I could still pick your brain with another question...
    I also have a Mac Pro 2 x 2,26 GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon, 6 GB 1066 MHz DDR3 ECC, NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 512 MB, OS X 10.9.5 (13F34)
    Since there are fast PCI slots available, I was looking to put an SSD in there, but I noticed that the price difference is substantially higher.
    I wont need more than 240/256 GB for the MacPro, since I have 2 2TB HDs and some others in there.
    My question is: is the performance of the PCI SSDs compared to the regular SDD worth the up-upgrade?
    Or should I just get another Crucial M550 (256GB) and put it in the second DVD bay?
    I'm thinking to put the RAM on hold for both computers for now, but I probably will get Crucial for both a.s.a.p.

  • Best upgrades for smooth HD video editing?

    I love video editing and plan on making the jump to HD.
    I intended on upgrading to a Quad Core...
    but I read somewhere that processors for Late 2008 Unibodies are not upgradeable, bummer!
    So, will an upgrade to 240GB SSD and 8GB RAM suffice?
    All I want is smooth editing and exporting,
    while regularly making the most of Adobe Premiere CS6 and inputing video from a Canon T3i DSLR.
    Anyone else using the 2008 unibody for editing HD video?
    What adjustments have you given your laptop?
    Will a SSD and RAM upgrade suffice?
    Your advice is well appreciated
    (p.s. I will probably be uprading to Mountain Lion, as well)

    I have two late 2008 Macbook Unibody.
    A 2GHz with a 120GB OCZ SSD and a 2.4GHz with a 128GB Kingston SSD.  Both have 8GB DDR3 1066MHz RAM installed.
    These are the two Macbooks I use at work - I use Photoshop and Premiere with no issues.
    Because of the speed of the SSD and the 8GB RAM upgrade - these Macbooks can keep up with my Late 2011 with 16GB of RAM and 240GB SSD.
    So your upgrade plan will have a significant performance boost to what you'll be using it for.

  • How can you make 3d models work in Motion 5 or Final Cut Pro for under 100$

    How would you be able to make a 3d model appear in Final Cut Pro or Motion and work, for cheap.

    Not sure what you mean by work or cheap but if you're looking to do 3D modelling on the cheap I'd suggest looking into Google Sketchup or Cheetah 3D- http://www.cheetah3d.com/. FCP X and Motion are not 3D modellers.

  • Best scanner for $100 still Epson Perfection 3490?

    Hi,
    I asked awhile back about the best scanner for around $100. I was told the Epson Perfection 3490. Is that still the best choice for the money?
    Also, where would you recommend buying it? I would rather not deal with internet sales in case I get one with a problem right out of the box.
    Thank you

    Forestman, you should pass on the 3490 and look at the new V100 if you prefer Epson.
    http://www.epson.com/cgi-bin/Store/consumer/consDetail.jsp?BV_UseBVCookie=yes&oi d=63059195
    Personally, I like the Canon CanoScan 4400F in this price range. It is also worth a look.
    http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/controller?act=ModelDetailAct&fcategoryid=120& modelid=13810
    Webb
    PM G5 1.8/A , MBP 2.16, PM G4 DA, iMac600SE, 9600/G4, Older Macs/OS 7-10.3   Mac OS X (10.4.7)   3GB RAM, 2 x Raptor 74, 4 x 300GB Maxtor ext SATA, FW800, 400 & SCSI drives

  • What are best options for home Mac Wi-Fi setup?

    Having a newer 3rd gen iPod Touch and planning on getting
    an Apple laptop ... what are some of the better Wi-Fi options
    to setup in my home environment (using indoors and around
    the house, patio, etc.?
    I'm obviously aware of Apple's products like AirPort Express Base Station,
    AirPort Extreme Base Station, and maybe even the older AirPort bases, but
    would also welcome any suggestions to inexpensive third-party "Mac friendly"
    Wi-Fi routers as well (ie: Belkin, NetGear, etc.)
    Some of the older Apple AirPort Base units are showing up on eBay, and
    even though slower than the newer Apple Wi-Fi routers, seem to offer a reasonable
    entry point at a reasonable price.
    What are some of the best Wi-Fi routers for a basic setup, the most reliable, and
    least expensive for starting out?
    Any suggestions will be appreciated.

    Apple routers generally work well but are expensive and in the middle range of performance. The Airport Extreme base station works well and is capable of operation across both the 2.4 and 5 GHz bands. Your Macbook will do well at 5 GHz and your touch at 2.4 GHz. However, there are other routers out there that will perform better for less money.
    So, I suggest you do some research on what would best fit your needs. The following website, http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/ does a really good job of wireless router reviews, albeit a bit technical. If you don't need the 5 GHz band, then there are a number of 2.4 GHz routers out there that will do really well for under $100. A good wireless N 2.4 GHz router will work well in your application.
    For prices and user reviews, both NewEgg and Amazon are much better locations to research/purchase than E-Bay.

  • Final Cut express upgrade for intel macbook pro

    I need help i used to have a G5 desktop and got DVD Studio Pro 3 and then i got Final Cut pro 4 with Upgrade, i try to install this software to the intel Macbook Pro wich i have 2 gig of memory, but if I install DVD Studio Pro 3 and Final Cut pro 4 it will run too slow and there is also the error pf agp graphic card missing i know that if you hit esc will run but it is to slow my hp 2.0ghz is faster i need help on which is the best upgrade for the intel mac so i don't have to purchase the software again i saw on www.apple.com/universal/crossgrade there are some option i call apple and they told me to buy the Final Cut Pro 4 or HD (4.5)for $199.00 but i want to make sure this is what i need to do! help

    Yes you need to crossgrade to 5.1
    The offer only lasts until the end of December and after that it'll probably go back up to $699.
    Also I wanted to point out that you're in the Final Cut Express forum asking about Final Cut Pro. Not a huge deal but in the future you might get better results asking Final Cut Pro related questions in the Final Cut Pro forum.
    i know that if you hit esc will run but it is to slow my hp 2.0ghz is faster
    Your HP runs Final Cut Pro and DVD Studio Pro faster?!? Huh...Bwa?!?
    By this I assume you mean your HP runs comparative programs faster (Avid)

  • Best SSD for A T420 under $200

    Hi,
    I am bumbling between a T420 and a X220, mostly because the X220 has a smaller screen and I am not sure how well I will be able to adjust to that (I already wear glasses, so ...).
    Which is the best SSD for the T420 under $200? Almost any capacity above 100 GB should be fine for me since I plan to get an UltraBay and put the HDD there.
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    punjabimunda wrote:
    Any other brand than Crucial? I am more interested in the Intel series. Which Intel series should I be looking at? Like I said, I don't need mammoth sizes. Good speed is a +.
    The Intel 520 series is also highly regarded, as is the Samsung 830 series. They're all good. You could do a Google search for reviews and comparison tests but I suspect you'll be happy with any of these.
    Cheers... Dorian Hausman
    X1C2, TPT2, T430s, SL500, X61s, T60p, A21p, 770, 760ED... 5160, 5150... S360/30

Maybe you are looking for

  • White Squares instead of Application Icons in Switch Applications

    My "Switch Applications" (Command-Tab) has started sporadically showing a white square instead of one of the icons for the applications I have open. I can still click through to them, but it is a little disconcerting. No particular application seems

  • My ipod 4 will not turn on, charge or connect to itunes/computer. nothing has happened to it to cause any damage to the hardware.

    i have  n ipod 4th geration. it has no hardware damage or water damage. it will not turn on, charge, or connect to itues/computer. my computer will not even pick up any hardware connection when i plug it in. the screen stays black. ive tried holding

  • Unexpected error

    We are currently having an issue with our SharePoint.  When a user attemps to delete a picture from the picture library, NOT the mysite picture, the system has an Unexpected error. I can delete the picture manually from the "edit" of the picture. I c

  • SUBCONTRACTING SCENERIO ISSUE

    HI, TO ALL EXPERTS,                           This is Manish.I am here with one subcontracting scenerio issue which as follw explain - 1)I have a material which is set for subcontracting.It have its own bom which includes raw material. 2)Suppose pric

  • Regarding to stock in the plant.

    I maintained stock in the plant i.e. Unrestricted stock Having batch number . while doing the delivary the system showing "only 0 kg of the material is avilable.( i maintained the batch number in the delivary note also)". may i know what are the sett