Best way to avoid requirement for network ACL after upgrade to 11g

Hi All,
After upgrade from 10g to 11g, I found Network ACLs required to make code using SYS.UTL_SMTP to work. Otherwise there is an error: ORA-24247: network access denied by access control list (ACL).
Do you know an elegant way to get rid of ACLs? I mean to open the network for all user's code, like it was on 10g, instead of checking what is actually needing it and doing specific ACLs for users. Database parameter disabling ACL restrictions seems natural option here, but it looks like Oracle not introduced such.
Kind Regards,
Artzaw

I don't know of a way to disable ACLs, no. I'd imagine that there probably is a hidden parameter that Oracle Support could direct you to. I'm hard-pressed to imagine why you'd really want to disable that functionality, though.
You can create an ACL that allows access to an arbitrary host on an arbitrary port (host => '*.*.*.*' and with NULL lower_port and upper_port values).
Justin

Similar Messages

Best way to set up home network using Time Capsule

Hi
My current home network consists of Macbook Pro 17 connected wirelessly, another Mac and few pcs. I have a Time Capsule, new netgear router and several hard drives. At the moment my main drive is plugged in via usb to the mac, however id like to set up a proper mini network where i can at least share several drives between macs, HOWEVER i also want to back up this data via TC, which is why at the moment my hard drive is plugged into the mac, so it can be backed up. Am i correct is saying that TC will not backup netwrok drives?
..any suggestions for best way to set up a network with TC backing up drives?
Thanks

paulsutt wrote:
Am i correct is saying that TC will not backup network drives?
Yes.
..any suggestions for best way to set up a network with TC backing up drives?
You could share the locally-connected drive. That would require that your Mac be on whenever any other network client needed to access the drive.

Best way to avoid an interface?

so far i have been able to record my keyboard via midi, my synth through a guitar cable with an attachment at the end that plugs it into the line in (not sure what its called) and same goes for guitar
so what i am wondering if there is a simple cheap way to get a mic plugged in without buying an interface
and if so is there any big quality differences without an interface
i have noticed that some of the garage band effects on my guitar produce some static and i am not sure if its the settings or what
thanks : )
also if i would be able to plug in a mixer without an interface
so basically what i am asking is
a. how to plug a mic and mixer into my mac and into garage band without an interface and
b. is there a quality difference (especially with guitar)

don1212 wrote:
ok sweet so the mixer will fix clipping
my band is investing in some drum mics and a new vocal mic too so the mixer will be really helpful
as for the guitar effects in garage band do they sounds pretty professional when they arent clipping?
i would really like to use them but i wanna mek sure they sounds quality when recorded
As long as you are contemplating a mixer, you might as well contemplate an interface. So the best answer to your question: The best way to avoid an interface? Is: Don't! You are using your computer to record audio from a variety of sources - guitar, mic, whatever... why get a second rate solution when a first rate solution exists? If budget is an issue, there are cheap interfaces just like there are cheap mixers. They're cheap enough so you could probably afford both if you needed a mixer and an interface, or some interfaces include the functions of both an interface and a mixer so you'd only need one.
I have a feeling that some of your "clipping" issues would go away with a proper interface that is designed to shuttle sound from the outside world into your computer just the way you want.
You might want to check out a major music retailer like www.sweetwater.com which has a very thorough selection of gear on their website. They are also very helpful if you call them, although don't let them sell you anything you don't want!
Oh, and the guitar effects in GB sound surprisingly good!
Interface!!!

When I send an email with Mail, I often confuse the account which I'm using. The result is that I send a message with the wrong account! Is there a way to avoid this (for example a reminder before the email is sent)?

When I send an email with Mail, I often confuse the account which I'm using. The result is that I send a message with the wrong account! Is there a way to avoid this (for example a reminder before the email is sent)?

Hi, thanks for the answer, I did that already. Unfortunatly this doesn't help me at all, as I often forget to check the menu. For me composing the message is writing the text, the subject, the person to who is addressed and than press "send".
I often forget to check the "from", and this is a problem because the software select itself one of the accounts.
Isn't there a way at least to put as a default a blank field instead of one of the accounts? or an account which doesn't work so if I forget to specify the "from" I will be rnotofied that the message can't be sent.
I guess this could be a rather common problem for many people!
Thanks
Sergio

What is the best way to format Videos for ipod touch?

What is the best way to format Videos for ipod touch? Used Quicktime Pro/ Export (iPhone setting). Videos aren't as crisp as downloaded Videos. Compressors /ipod video Setting also looks crapy (with bitrate med & High). What should I use?

Visualhub is a transcoder with multiple input and output formats with specific setting for iPod,iPod touch. Costs around $19-used to work great but recently everything I convert suffers audio crash than closes out the player. Hopefully they will fix it.
Elgato H.264 hardware transcoder is $99 dollars(USB stick that plugs in to Mac)-speeds up encoding of any file quicktime can handle, settings for apple tv, iphone/touch, ipod,Sony PSP. Worth the cost if you transcode a lot of video for the Touch or own an elgato HD tuner. Files work flawlessly and look great.
Mpeg streamclip-free. Works great, has presets or can customize the output.

What is the best way to create space for a Yosemite download?

What are the best ways to create space for the download of Yosemite. I can't install it as I don't have enough space.

Did you empty Trash? Very important!
How much space do you have available? Click in the HDD icon on the desktop, COMMAND+I.
Also try a Safe Boot:
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1564?viewlocale=en_US
That will temporarily create some additional space.
Ciao.

Best way to prepare photos for iPhoto printed book

Hello,
I was wondering what would be the best way to prepare photos for iPhoto printed book on a Macbook Pro so to achieve the most realistic results to what's on the screen
ie. which software should I use to change photos from RGB to CMYK, photoshop or iPhoto itself. I'm guessing maybe the autofix feature in iPhoto? (I don't have Aperture)
Secondly, which monitor color setting should I set the screen at? I'm guessing it's either Apple RGB or Colour LCD, maybe even ColorMatch RGB?
Any any other tips that people can give in achieving the most realistic results to what you have on the screen when your printed iPhoto book gets sent back. I don't want the mid tones to disappear or become too bright because the gamma and color settings were different to what they use at the other end.
Many thanks.

Hi,
The situation has changed a little, our original photos are in RAW format and some of them are slightly over saturated in the higher tones.
I've read on other threads that it is a good idea to run the 'Enhance' tool on all photos before sending the iPhoto Book away.
Since iPhoto's 'Enhance' tools seems to do a lot of helpful things like sharpen, adjust the levels, etc it also seems to notch the contrast up and this would prove destructive for the lighter and darker tones not captured by the camera's dynamic range.
So as I've been advised it's best to use Apple's own tools before sending the iPhoto Book away, so I'm going to download the trial of Aperture.
Does anyone have any more recommendations on which monitor colour profile setting to use etc. I've also read that iPhoto prints best from JPEGS so the RAW will obviously need changed. Will Aperture automatically save to Profile name: Camera RGB Profile after I've done some editing there?
What would be the best way to prepare RAW images in aperture where some of them might need an Image Overlay in Photomatix then imported back to Aperture for printing an Apple/iPhoto style Book?
Many thanks

What is the best way to avoid latency when using the io plug in?

What is the best way to avoid latency when using the io plug in?

Hi colin a.
Welcome to the Support Communities!
The article below may be able to help you with this. Click on the link to see more details and screenshots.
Logic: About I/O buffer size and monitoring latency
http://support.apple.com/kb/ht1314
Cheers,
- Judy

I unable to see my network messages after upgrading to ios6 on my iphone4,can anyone help me for this issue?

I unable to see my network messages after upgrading to ios6 on my iphone4,can anyone help me for this issue?

Try to perform SMC and PRAM resets:
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3964
http://support.apple.com/kb/ht1379
Then try a safe boot:
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1564
Ciao.

E4200 Can't see my network shares after upgrade

I can't see my network shares after upgrade altough everything works fine , the network scanner shows all the atatched devices but in Eplorer when I click Network there is nothing shown on two computers running Win7 64.
I did downgraded the firmware back to .01 but still no network .
Any help ?

After upgrading the firmware did you reset the E4200? After successful firmware upgrade you need to reset the router. It is recommended to reset the router once. Steps to reset the router:
Push the reset button on router for 30 seconds, turn off the router wait for 30 seconds and then power it on. Power light should blink when you perform the reset process.
After reset, reconfigure the router and then check the connectivity status…

Best way to configure iTunes on network server for multiple macs

Hi all
Currently have a Mac Mini (late 2006 Tiger) running iTunes library on my QNAPTS239pro Network attached storage. It works great.
On Monday I am getting a new iMac and MacBook Pro (i.e. with Snow Leopard).
What is the best way for iTunes to be configured from each Mac to use the same library on the NAS?
Ideally, I want to add music from any of the macs (usually from CD not the store) and have a single library updated on the NAS. I don't want multiple sync'd copies - that's a back up night mare.
Any thought appreciated.
Kind regards
Andrew

it's a rather old article but click here for one possible setup scenario.
JGG

Best way of storing content for home network?

I have a 3rd gen Apple TV and a family with numerous iPada, iPhones and Macs. We also have a finite limit on our internet data consumption. I'm looking for the best way of managing my kids' movie downloads so that they don't keep downloading the same movies to different devices, consuming our data allowance in the process.
Ideally I'm looking for a way of connecting a hard disk to the wireless network so that we can download direct to that, using one of our macs or iPads, and then have the Apple TV stream from there. But that seems harder than it should be, if not impossible. At the moment we all have our individual libraries on our devices but often both kids want the same movies so that means the same movies getting downloaded twice.
Using family sharing we can share each other's purchases but each family member has to end up with their own copy of the movie in their library on at least one of their devices if they want to watch it, which means downloading multiple times.
Is there a way of achieving a home network with a core storage device shared amongst the family members which can be used both for streaming to iPads and appletv?
Thanks
James

Thank you Rudegar that is helpful. I hadn't realised that you could get an iOS app to control a NAS, so that could fix it for me.
Can multiple users with different libraries store their movies on the same NAS? And would any user then be able to play a movie stored on the NAS by using AirPlay to stream it to the AppleTV?
What NAS would you recommend?
Many thanks, James

Best way to extend wi-fi network for MBP + way to remotely wire it in?

I have a unibody MBP which has been a little touchy with wi-fi (I can get it to work with my AEBs but only if I set the AEBs to N-only/5 Ghz). I moved into a new place and am planning to use the MBP in a room that will position it about 40 feet from the AEBs. I'm wondering what the best way is to make sure it will have a consistent and fast connection. Two questions:
#1 - What are my best options for extending the wi-fi range? I think I could buy an Airport Express right? Or what about third-party wi-fi extenders? Any recommendations?
#2 - Are there any options for actually having a wired connection is a separate room? I thought I read something about the ability to run Ethernet over the electrical wires. If I could wire in from the other room that would be great but it's not feasible to run an Ethernet cable there from the AEBs.
Thanks for any help!

You can use an Airport Express as a bridge. Instructions for that setup are in this kbase article:
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT2044
There are products that run a network over AC power lines:
http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/category/category_slc.asp?CatId=211
I'd recommend the AE wireless solution, though.

What is the best way to extend a Wireless network?

Hi,
We have 3 devices,
1) Our Primary Network Router (which creates our office Network and has DHCP enabled).
2) We have and Airport Extreme, which is used to create our Wireless Network (THIS IS SET TO “Create Wireless Network”), it has DHCP Enabled, its DHCP IP Scheme is set to 192.168.2.x, where the IP Scheme of our Primary Network is set to 192.168.181.x.
3) We have an Airport Express that we are trying to use to EXTEND our Wireless Network.
The most important thing we are trying to accomplish is to isolate the Wireless Network from our Primary Network, so Wireless Clients can access the Internet, but CAN’T SEE or ACCESS the Shared Network Volumes AVAILABLE ON THE PRIMARY NETWORK.
At the moment, the Wireless Clients can access the Internet and receive an IP in the range of 192.168.2.x from the DHCP Server in the Airport Extreme. That part of it is working, but the Wireless Clients can unfortunately still SEE and ACCESS the Network Volumes available on the Primary Network. WHICH IS NOT WHAT WE WANT!!
Question 1: How can we have the Airport Create a separate Network, so the Wireless Clients CAN’T SEE or ACCESS the Network Volumes from the Primary Network, but can still get access to the Internet through the Primary Network?
Question 2: What is the best way to use the Airport Express to “EXTEND” the Airport Extreme’s Wireless Network? I have tried WDS “Main” for Extreme and WDS “Remote” for Express, but all that doesn’t allow you to use the Extreme to Create a Separate Network, it uses the DHCP Server built into the Primary Network’s Router. Also tried to set the Express to “EXTEND WIRELESS NETWORK”, which seems to work, but I am not sure why. Because I don’t have a cable from the Extreme to the Express, which is sounds like you have to when it is setup that way!!
Any help would be greatly appreciated!!
Thanks
Kalagan

Question 1: How can we have the Airport Create a separate Network, so the Wireless Clients CAN’T SEE or ACCESS the Network Volumes from the Primary Network, but can still get access to the Internet through the Primary Network?
There is no way to do this. Any of the wireless clients of the AirPort Extreme base station (AEBS) can see any device connected to the AEBS's WAN port. Clients of a subnet can see anything on the supernet.
You could configure you network like this:
Internet-> (WAN) AEBS (LAN) -> Primary router
As long as the Primary router was providing DHCP/NAT the things on the LAN side of the Primary router would be hidden from the AEBS clients.
A better solution may be to have 2 completely separate networks OR invest in some type of network security firewall device to actively isolate your Primary network.
Question 2: What is the best way to use the Airport Express to “EXTEND” the Airport Extreme’s Wireless Network? I have tried WDS “Main” for Extreme and WDS “Remote” for Express, but all that doesn’t allow you to use the Extreme to Create a Separate Network, it uses the DHCP Server built into the Primary Network’s Router. Also tried to set the Express to “EXTEND WIRELESS NETWORK”, which seems to work, but I am not sure why. Because I don’t have a cable from the Extreme to the Express, which is sounds like you have to when it is setup that way!!
WDS is 802.11g's method of wirelessly extending a network.
"Extend wireless network" is 802.11n's method of wirelessly extending a network.
Neither of them require the AirPort Express (AX) to be cabled to the AEBS.

What is the best way to configure AE for use as a wireless bridge?

I am using an AE to provide airtunes to my living room receiver as well as getting internet connection to my living room PC. The way I have it set up is that I am connecting to my existing wireless network (provided by a dlink dir-655) and then plug in the minijack for airtunes and plug in ethernet cable between AE and PC. I don't have a wireless card in the PC so that's why I connect via ethernet cable/AE.
The problem is that the speed with the AE connected PC when it comes to the web, is quite slow. Many times Youtube just freezes and sometimes never catches back up.
I've checked speeds with speedtest.net and my speeds fluctuate an extreme amount.
Is there a way I should configure the AE better to act as a bridge for my ethernet/AE connected PC?
BTW, I'm only about 25 feet from the dlink wireless router so connection quality should be fine. As both devices support N, I think things should work better!
any suggestions?
Thanks

The newer 802.11n version of the AirPort Express offer an option to configure the base station as a wireless Ethernet bridge. Again, Apple calls this ProxySTA. You configure for a ProxySTA by having the base station join an existing wireless network AND by enabling the "Allow Ethernet Clients" option, located on the Wireless tab within the AirPort Utility.
My point is that, as a ProxySTA, the Express will NOT extend the wireless range of your D-Link router. Instead, it WILL allow wired clients to connect to its Ethernet port for network/Internet access.
In the manual setup settings, I see that there is a wireless setting to extend a wireless network and to participate in a WDS network. Would either of these two be better for what I'm trying to accomplish?
In this scenario, no ... as a WDS would not work because very few non-Apple routers are WDS-compatible. Most likely, your D-Link is not as well ... so your current configuration is the only option for what you are trying to do.
It seems that this current configuration should be rock solid, but perhaps I'm not using the proper setup.
The #1 problem with a ProxySTA is that it does not provide the highest level of bandwidth performance. Typically, for the AXn, the best-to-worst performance would be the following configurations: 1) Wired-to-wireless, 2) Wireless-to-wireless (WDS), and 3) Wireless-to-wired (ProxySTA)
As you can see, the first option would be the best, but it would require that you connect the AXn directly to the D-Link by Ethernet ... which, of course, would tie-up its only Ethernet port so that you could not connect the PC to it as you require.

Best way to avoid requirement for network ACL after upgrade to 11g

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for