Best way to handle large files in FCE HD and iDVD.

Hi everyone,
I have just finished working on a holiday movie that my octagenarian parents took. They presented me with about 100 minutes of raw footage that I have managed to edit down to 64 minutes. They have viewed the final version that I recorded back to tape for them. They now want to know if I can put it onto a DVD for them as well. Problem is the FCE HD file is 13Gb.
So here is my question.
What is the best way to handle this problem?
I have spoken to a friend of mine who is a professional editor. She said reduce the movie duration down to about 15mins because it's probably too long and boring. (rather hurtful really) Anyway that is out of the question as far as my oldies are concerned.
I have seen info on Toast 8 that mentions a "Fit to DVD" process that purports to "squash" 9Gb of movie to a 4.7Gb disk. I can't find if it will also put 13Gb onto a dual layer 8.5Gb disk.
Do I have to split the movie into two parts and make two dual layer DVD's? If so I have to ask - How come "Titanic", 3hrs+ fits on one disk??
Have I asked too many questions?

Take a deep breath. Relax. All is fine.
iDVD does not look at the size of your video file, it looks at the length. iDVD can accomodate up to 2 hours of movie
iDVD gives you different options depending on the length of your movie. Although I won't agree with your friend about reducing the length of your movie to 15 minutes, if you could trim out a few minutes to get it under an hour that setting in iDVD (Best Performance though the new version may have renamed it) gives you the best quality. Still, any iDVD setting will give you good quality even at 64 minutes
In FCE export as Quicktime Movie NOT any flavour of Quicktime Conversion. Select chapter markers if you have them. If everything is on one system unchecked the Make Movie Self Contained button. Drop the QT file into iDVD

Similar Messages

Best way to handle source files

Hi there,
After some pretty general advise please.
The company I work for looks after a lot of websites, and one
of the
headaches we have is the best way to handle source files. By
source files I'm
referring to Photoshop files, Flash .fla files and also other
none Adobe
files that relate to a site, not the .html, .asp, .aspx,
.css, .js etc type
files.
Now I'm NOT after a version control system, just a simple way
to store the
source files in a location that is separate from the website
but still to be
able to have a smooth workflow between the Dreamweaver site
and it's source
files.
At the moment, and I know this is unwise, we have a
subdirectory within the
site where we store the source files, and use WebDAV to
transfer both site
and source files to and from the server. But I really want to
separate the
site from source but still maintain a link between site and
source...... if
you see what I mean. I think the upshot is I would like to be
able to open a
site within Dreamweaver and instantly be able to access that
sites source
files if needed. This method needs to be shared across a
small team spread
round the UK.
I looked at the Repository Subversion version control, but
like I said I'm
not after a source control system, plus it appeared to
conflict with WebDAV
and Contribute, that some of our clients use to maintain
content on their
sites. I also looked at Version Cue which looked promising,
but can't see a
clear workflow between Dreamweaver and Version Cue which
separates site from
source. I might be missing something.... part of my brain
perhaps. :)
Would be grateful for any advice please.
Cheers,
@ndyB

Take a deep breath. Relax. All is fine.
iDVD does not look at the size of your video file, it looks at the length. iDVD can accomodate up to 2 hours of movie
iDVD gives you different options depending on the length of your movie. Although I won't agree with your friend about reducing the length of your movie to 15 minutes, if you could trim out a few minutes to get it under an hour that setting in iDVD (Best Performance though the new version may have renamed it) gives you the best quality. Still, any iDVD setting will give you good quality even at 64 minutes
In FCE export as Quicktime Movie NOT any flavour of Quicktime Conversion. Select chapter markers if you have them. If everything is on one system unchecked the Make Movie Self Contained button. Drop the QT file into iDVD

Best way to handle text files in OD10g

We have a requirement to store reports in text format into a database field, to be able to view the reports, and to print them if desired using Forms 10g. What is the best way to handle this?
- define the field in the database as clob or blob?
- if CLOB is the choice, what tools to use to upload CLOBs to the database (since webutil transfer is for blob only)?
- in Forms 10g, can one use the Forms data type LONG for CLOB?
- can you do Forms search on clob and blob fields?
- how can reports that are stored in fields be viewed without first downloading to the client workstation?
- in Forms 10g, what is the best way to view text files residing in local PCs: "host notepad myFile"?
Thanks much for your reply!
gk

Take a deep breath. Relax. All is fine.
iDVD does not look at the size of your video file, it looks at the length. iDVD can accomodate up to 2 hours of movie
iDVD gives you different options depending on the length of your movie. Although I won't agree with your friend about reducing the length of your movie to 15 minutes, if you could trim out a few minutes to get it under an hour that setting in iDVD (Best Performance though the new version may have renamed it) gives you the best quality. Still, any iDVD setting will give you good quality even at 64 minutes
In FCE export as Quicktime Movie NOT any flavour of Quicktime Conversion. Select chapter markers if you have them. If everything is on one system unchecked the Make Movie Self Contained button. Drop the QT file into iDVD

Best way of handling large amounts of data movement

Hi
I like to know what is the best way to handle data in the following scenario
1. We have to create Medical and Rx claims Tables for 36 months of data about 150 million records each - First month (month 1, 2, 3, 4, .......34, 35, 36)
2. We have to add the DELTA of month two to the 36 month baseline. But the application requirement is ONLY 36 months, even though the current size is 37 months.
3 Similarly in the 3rd month we will have 38 months, 4th month will have 39 months.
4. At the end of 4th month - how can I delete the First three months of data from Claim files without affecting the performance which is a 24X7 Online system.
5. Is there a way to create Partitions of 3 months each and that can be deleted - Delete Partition number 1, If this is possible, then what kind of maintenance activity needs to be done after deleting partition.
6. Is there any better way of doing the above scenario. What other options do I have.
7 My goal is to eliminate the initial months data from system as the requirement is ONLY 36 months data.
Thanks in advance for your suggestion
sekhar

Hi,
You should use table partitioning to keep your data on monthly partitions. Serach on table partitioning for detailed examples.
Regards

Best way to handle large number video files for a project..

Hey, I was looking at getting some insight from the community here. Bascially there is a project that is being worked on that requires large amount of footage to be sifted through that only a small percentage will be used. These are mostly HD files and while most of the footage has been watched on Quicktime with notes taken, my question is this.
What is the best way to take only small portions of each file without having to load everything into final cut and without any loose of quality. Should I just trim and rename from Quicktime or is there an easier way?
Reason this needs to be done this way is the smaller segments will each be sent to other editors and rather then send huge files we want to split it to smaller amounts for each editor to use.
Thank you so much for any input regarding this, I look forward to what you have to say

Open the clip into the viewer. Mark In and Out points on the section you want. Make it a subclip Cmd-U. Drag the subclip into the bin for the editor who needs it. Repeat.
If you batch export from a clip there is a selection to choose whether to export the whole clip or check box to export the marked I/O.
This does not sound like a good project on which to being learning FCP.

What is the best way to handle .mod files in premiere pro cs4?

I recently got a JVC Everio GZ-MG130u and as I'm sure many of you are aware, it saves footage in the .mod format.
I have googled this and found quite a few different solutions, but I'm just wondering if anything has changed since some of these solutions were posted, or in other words, what is the best way at this current point in time to handle .mod files in premiere pro cs4?
As far as I know, the best thing to do is convert the .mod to .avi and then import it into premiere so it can be edited.. Is there a better way to do it than this? Also, by doing it this way, will I have separate audio and video tracks?
Thanks.

I have just done a bit of reading, here. All of the quotes that follow are from users who have posted in that thread.
It seems that there isn't one solid answer on this subject. The thread that I linked to was started 2 years ago, and replied to just 4 ago, so it's relatively current.
I noticed a couple different interesting statements:
posted by mmontgomery:
In the case of .MOD, you are actually getting a MPEG-2 file. The way
video files work is that there is a codec (COmpressor/DECompressor)
algorithm and a file wrapper (or extension). A JVC .MOD file is a
MPEG-2 encoded file, with a .MOD extension.
You're faced with two
challenges, first the .MOD file type is only recognized and support by a
few applications. I think we covered some of those already. The
interesting thing about wrappers and extensions is that they can be
dealt with in a variety of ways. Sometimes all you need to do to convert
the video file to a compatible video file is to change the extension.
In the case of .MOD files that's not enough. The .MOD wrapper apparently
does a few more things than just bare a unique extension name. It
requires a slightly more complicated method to convert that file. That
is why there is supplied software and that certain third party
applications have .MOD support.
(posted 2 years ago)
This seems to indicate that Ann's solution of simply re-naming the extension is not good enough, unless I am mis-interpreting what she meant.
However, another user said:
posted by futball8:
I edit with Adobe Premiere Pro CS3. All I have to do is simply rename
the .MOD files as .MPG and then import into PP CS3. It takes a small
amount of time to conform the audio, but no file conversion is
necessary. It's a pretty slick workflow and I've never encountered any
problems editing them this way.
(posted 5 months ago)
One can only assume that simply re-naming the extension from .mod to .mpg works in some circumstances, and doesn't work in others. I assume it depends largely on the editing software being used. Perhaps there are still issues that futball8 was simply unaware of or never encountered.
That said, there seems to be a couple of different real solutions to this problem that I have found:
1. Simply use an editing program that supports .mod file format. While pe7 and pe8 supposedly support the .mod format, the following should be noted:
posted by macksgarage:
While Elements 'supports' these files, it is markedly unstable and frequently crashes while using the files, though the application is otherwise reliable. The solution I have arrived at is to repair the container using ffmpeg. (see #3)
(posted 5 months ago)
2. Use a file conversion utility of your choice that will covert .mod to .avi, or another desired format. Import the resulting .avi file into premiere pro cs4.
3. Use FFmpeg. This seems to be the best solution as it does not convert any audio or video:
posted by macksgarae:
If you are not familiar with ffmpeg, it may be a bit of a bear to
learn, but it's not only useful for this, but functions as a video swiss
army knife useful for splicing, muxing/demuxing, and rendering just
about any format into just about any other format.
ffmpeg is an open source project from the linux world, but it has
been ported and is supported on windows. Fetch it here and place it somewhere handy
on your system.
To rewrite the container into a nice, standards compliant .mpg file
that doesn't make applications die, WITHOUT rerendering video or audio
itself, I use this command.
ffmpeg -i INFILE.MOD -acodec copy - vcodec copy OUTFILE.mpg
This not only renames the file, but actually rebuilds the container
around unmodified video and audio data, yielding a file which works much
more stably with Adobe applications, and presumably others as well, as
ffmpeg's open source development goals result in very standards
compliant files.
(posted 5 months ago)
Now, this seems to properly address the issues that can arise from simply renaming .mod to .mpg, as suggested by Ann. So from this point, I assume you can simply import the .mpg into Premiere Pro cs4 (or any other .mpg compliant program) and edit without issue, but it seems like I remember hearing something about Premiere not liking mpegs or something like that, so in that case, maybe it'd be better to skip this and go with option #2. But, it's been awhile since I've touched any NLE, much less premiere pro cs4, so I could be completely wrong and it may have no problems handling mpegs.
All of the things that I've quoted here came from the same thread, so I don't know how accurate any of this is, but the people that have posted these things seem fairly knowledgeable. If someone reads all of this and can confirm or deny any of it, it would be much appreciated.
Option 1 is not really an option for me, because I am sticking with premiere pro cs4 -- I'm not going to get another editor just because it has .mod support. That leaves me with options 2 and 3: Convert to avi, or change the file wrapper/extension properly with FFmpeg and then simply import the resulting .mpg file... Which is better? Or is there yet another solution that I am unaware of that would be even better?

Best Way to Copy Large Files

In copying files to a USB memory stick, is there a particular file size limit above which simple drag and drop using the Finder does not work consistently? In general can we assume that if it appears to copy OK, then the files are in good shape? For example, if I'm copying a Documents folder with 5 GB of data onto an 8 GB USB stick would it be appropriate to use drag and drop? What are the alternative ways to copy large blocks of data? Is there a way to use Disk Utility for this?
I should mention one of the reasons I'm asking. I've occasionally noticed large copying procedures sometimes cause the Finder to "hang."
I do have SuperDuper which I use to clone my internal HD to a peripheral HD on a regular basis. Would that software provide a way to copy single files or folders containing lots of files to my USB memory stick?
Thanks,
Steve M.
Message was edited by: Steve M.

Drag and drop is fine. There's really no good reason to do it a different way.
The only file limit is if the USB stick is formatted FAT32. Then 4GB minus 1 byte is the largest file size it can hold. If you format the stick as Mac OS Extended (HFS+), there's no limit to the file size, just the capacity of the drive itself.
If you need to share between Mac and Windows, then formatting the stick as ExFAT is best. The only catch is that versions of OS X earlier than Snow Leopard will not be able to read the drive. Windows XP, Vista and Win 7 can read ExFAT. There is also essentially no file size limit with ExFAT.
As far as the hanging, that may be the OS stalling on a file larger than 4 GB if the USB stick is formatted as FAT32.

Best way to transfer large files over the Internet?

What is the best way to transfer files that are too large to send by e-mail over the internet, preferably ways that are free or very cheap and are easiest for sender and receiver to work with?
I assume one way is by ftp, but would that necessarily mean buying space on a server somewhere that both I and my recipients can get to? or is there a way to avoid this cost?

you can use a cloud storage like Mobileme (not free) or DropBox (free up to 2GB).
you can also use direct file sharing over internet. no extra software or 3rd party services required. that's what I use to move files between my home and work computers.

Best way to handle large amount of text

hello everyone
My project involves handling large amount of text.(from
conferences and
reports)
Most of them r in Ms Word. I can turn them into RTF format.
I dont want to use scrolling. I prefer turning pages(next,
previous, last,
contents). which means I need to break them into chunks.
Currently the process is awkward and slow.
I know there wud b lots of people working on similar
projects.
Could anyone tell me an easy way to handle text. Bring them
into cast and
break them.
any ideas would be appreciated
thanx
ahmed

Hacking up a document with lingo will probably loose the rtf
formatting
information.
Here's a bit of code to find the physical position of a given
line of on
screen text (counting returns is not accurate with word
wrapped lines)
This stragety uses charPosToLoc to get actual position for
the text
member's current width and font size
maxHeight = 780 -- arbitrary display height limit
T = member("sourceText").text
repeat with i = 1 to T.line.count
endChar = T.line[1..i].char.count
lineEndlocV = charPosToLoc(member "sourceText",
endChar).locV
if lineEndlocV > maxHeight then -- fount "1 too many"
line
-- extract identified lines "sourceText"
-- perhaps repeat parce with remaining part of "sourceText"
singlePage = T.line[1..i - 1]
member("sourceText").text = T.line[i..99999] -- put remaining
text back
into source text member
If you want to use one of the roundabout ways to display pdf
in
director. There might be some batch pdf production tools that
can create
your pages in pretty scalable pdf format.
I think flashpaper documents can be adapted to director.

Best way to handle large list of results in recordsets?

Hello all.
I'm using Dreamweaver CS3, MySQL and ASP/VBScript.
My database of users behind my website is now approaching 25,000.
I often have to "move" items in the database from one user record to another.
Up and until now, I've done this simply by way of a drop down menu/list that is populated with the user ID# and Name of each and every user in the database. This previously allowed me to simply select the ID of the Customer I wanted to "Move" the record to.
The problem, is that the system is of course now trying to load a list of almost 25,000 user ID's each time I view the relevant site page, which is now taking so long to load it's uncomfortable.
I've seen other sites that allow you to start typing something in to a text box and it starts filtering the results that match as you type, showing a list below.
I assume (but am happy to be advised otherwise) that this is likely to be my best way forward, but I haven't the first clue how to do it.
Can anyone advise?
Regards
David.

You're looking for a 'type ahead' control. Try searching the web, although you may have trouble finding example code for classic asp. I did find some asp.net solutions out there.

Best way to download large files direct to disk?

Hi,
I am writing a process that will download a file (in the
background, no GUI interaction) and will save it onto the users
drive. Once it is saved to disk they will be notified.
I don't want to use FileReference as that prompts the user, I
also don't want to just use UrlStream direct into a ByteArray
because the files can be quite big and I don't want to hog memory.
What would you recommend I do? Is the only option to simply
do an urlstream.readBytes() into a smaller temporary ByteArray and
then immediately write those bytes to disk, rather than appending
to an overall larger byte array that only gets written once the
entire file is saved?

I think it might be your lucky day, I think I just saw the
article you need.....
http://jarinheit.com/2008/06/19/downloading-large-files-in-adobe-air-with-flex/
....you didn't say what you wanted to do it in and well Im
trying to learn JS and all this so I converted it....
quote:
<html>
<head>
<script src="AIRAliases.js" />
<script>
var urlString = "
http://www.adobe.com/lib/com.adobe/template/gnav/adobe-hq.png";
var urlReq = new air.URLRequest(urlString);
var urlStream = new air.URLStream();
var fileStream = new air.FileStream();
urlStream.addEventListener(air.Event.COMPLETE, loaded);
urlStream.addEventListener(air.ProgressEvent.PROGRESS,
writeFile);
var file =
air.File.desktopDirectory.resolvePath("testing.png");
fileStream.openAsync(file, air.FileMode.WRITE);
urlStream.load(urlReq);
function writeFile(event) {
// only write every 50k or so downloaded
if (urlStream.bytesAvailable > 51200) {
// Read the buffer into a ByteArray and write it to disk
var data = new air.ByteArray();
urlStream.readBytes(data, 0, urlStream.bytesAvailable);
fileStream.writeBytes(data, 0, data.length);
function loaded(event) {
// Write any remaining data to the file before closing it
var data = new air.ByteArray();
urlStream.readBytes(data, 0, urlStream.bytesAvailable);
fileStream.writeBytes(data, 0, data.length);
fileStream.close();
</script>
</head>
<body>
</body>
</html>
...and it downloads it in the background.
Hope it helps.

Best way to copy large files to a desktop computer

I have a MacBook Air with a large (16GB) iPhoto library that I want to copy to 2 desktop iMacs. The desktops are on an ethernet link with a hub, and I have an Airport network as well. Copy time via Airport shows as 20 hours. I have used the USB-to-ethernet connector to tie the MBA into the ethernet network but am still getting a copy time of 10 hours. Is there a faster way to link these machines? Thanks.

I have found the fastest way is to copy the whole shebang on an external hard disk with a USB 2 connection. I also have tons of photographs on mine and make that step in between e.g. first copy on an external HD and then on to the larger Mac
what you describe is terribly slow. I agree

What's the best way to transfer large files to a fellow Mac user?

… ftp, file sharing, dropbox…?

Is this a one-time transfer?
If so, what is your email file size limit?
Depending on the limit, try Compressing the file. If that doesn't work, try splitting the file into smaller chunks with Tar.
In Terminal (assumes file is on Desktop, if not, just change cd)
Note: don't use full path in filename unless you want it stored in the Tar
This will break the file into 10MG chunks (-L10000):
cd Desktop
/usr/bin/gnutar -L10000 -cMv --file=tar_archive.{tar,tar-{2..25}} [FileToTar]
to Extract on the receivers end:
/usr/bin/gnutar -xMv --file=tar_archive.{tar,tar-{2..25}}

Ways to handle large volume data (file size = 60MB) in PI 7.0 file to file

Hi,
In a file to file scenario (flat file to xml file), the flat file is getting picked up by FCC and then send to XI. In xi its performing message mapping and then XSL transformation in a sequence.
The scenario is working fine for small files (size upto 5MB) but when the input flat file size is more then 60 MB, then XI is showing lots of problem like (1) JCo call error or (2) some times even XI is stoped and we have to strat it manually again to function properly.
Please suggest some way to handle large volume (file size upto 60MB) in PI 7.0 file to file scenario.
Best Regards,
Madan Agrawal.

Hi Madan,
If every record of your source file was processed in a target system, maybe you could split your source file into several messages by setting up this in Recordset Per Messages parameter.
However, you just want to convert you .txt file into a .xml file. So, try firstly to setting up
EO_MSG_SIZE_LIMIT parameter in SXMB_ADM.
However this could solve the problem in Inegration Engine, but the problem will persit in Adapter Engine, I mean, JCo call error ...
Take into account that file is first proccessed in Adapter Engine, File Content Conversion and so on...
and then it is sent to the pipeline in Integration Engine.
Carlos

What is best way dealing with large tiff file in OSX Lion?

I'm working with large tiff file (engineering drawing), but preview couldnt handle (unresponsive) this situation.
What is best way dealing with large tiff file in OSX Lion? (Viewing only or simple editing)
Thx,
54n9471

Use an iPad and this app http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewSoftware?id=400600005&mt=8

Best way to handle large files in FCE HD and iDVD.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for