Better Quality Control

Hi I am email you on not hearing from from LULU for no approx 5 days as a result of the recent order 16811326. I have made the size correct. I have uploaded the the work and received a proof book.
On page 2 8 and 10 has a whiter boarder. All the pages were uploaded as on separate pdf so my questions why do I still have a white boarder. I confirmed the page sides with, is name Jesoph?
Please on any further orders can we have better quality control? If all other pages have a white border I could understand but only those 3. I am writing in a controlled manner asking if you can be good enough to respond to my email

Hello Esmee
It sounds as some of your pages may not have the correct full bleed settings. I am sure someone from our print team will respond to your support request shortly. Please keep in mind that we work M-F from 8-5.

Similar Messages

Quality control? crashes, performance, image quality...

I like to functionality of new lightroom, but once more I have to say: what about quality control? even after 2.1 this prog is a beta-version at best:
- performance: slower than a mountain duck
- image quality: adjustment-brush not ready for prime time
- stability: lightroom crashes more often in one day than all other programs together in one year.
summary: very poor quality control and very poo customer.
Phil

Phillie1
I understand your frustration. I too love LR's functionality but I've had a nightmare with it, particularly since 2.1. I have a high specified machine; Q6600, 4GB RAM, ATI 4850, XPsp3. LR constantly crashes.(the only program that does so) No Virus checker, Latest GFX driver, etc.
My main Issue-The Develop Module, After 30-45 mins usage.
(No difference whether it's my H3D-39 or 1DS mkIII files.)
In v1.0 I used to get an upside down red out of memory error.
I had to quit and restart to resolve.
In v2.0 unfortunately things got worse. The red OOM message was gone but unfortunately this was replaced by a gray area where the image should've been. I had to quit and restart to resolve.
I read that the problem in the develop module had been fixed in 2.1, seemingly it was attributable to a memory leak? Guess what?
Still a gray area where the image should be, sometimes preceded by the image flipping 180deg. I have to quit and restart to resolve.
Task manager confirms some odd things going on with memory.
I cannot use 2.1 with confidence, particularly so in front of my clients. It's not solid enough.

App Store Quality Control

A quick review of the existing threads reveals a pattern of application crashes... does anybody know if there is any sort of quality control going on to get an application on the App Store?
I have had numerous applications, some free and some paid, that end up crashing on launch or shortly thereafter that have caused me to either have to re-download the application or completely restore my iPhone.
Given that the App Store is the only way for developers to release their applications and there isn't a viable option for being able to try apps before we buy do we have any guarantee as the the quality of the applications or are we merely paying beta testers?

There is no regular pattern as to what is even causing these crashes SOME people seem to be having. I say some people because not everyone is experiencing any crashes. I have 36 apps installed on two white iPhones and I have no crashes. I'm not sure if Apple will allow refunds for apps that crash or not.

Hi, i created and bought a 74 pages book on iPhoto that costs me around 96 euros. It was delivered with a all 2 pages badly printed. It is not acceptable that there is no quality control at this level of price.I am very disappointed and wo't buy again!!!

hi, i created and bought a 74 pages book on iPhoto that costs me around 96 euros. It was delivered with a all 2 pages badly printed. It is not acceptable that there is no quality control at this level of price.I am very disappointed and won't buy again!!!
except this major point i must admit the quality is quite good , but a bick lack of quality control and a customer disapointed at the end.
On the internet site it is not possible to send it back. So apple doesn't want to take in account that they mail sometimes fail, and want to satisfy their customer, because you have no other choice that accepting it.
best regards

Yes it is returnable.
http://store.apple.com/us/help/returns_refund
That's for the US, there's a similar one for your country.

Which yields a better quality slideshow?

Which yields better quality images?
If I "send" my slideshow from iPhoto to iDVD? Or if I start in iDVD and import a slideshow from iPhoto?

It's probably more a matter of personal preference than anything else. Allegedly, a track ripped at aac 128 sounds "better" than a 128 mp3. You should rip a track with which you are familiar in both formats (and perhaps at different bit rates) to see which you like the best.

Which yields better quality images?

Which yields better quality images?
If I "send" my slideshow from iPhoto to iDVD? Or if I start in iDVD and import a slideshow from iPhoto?

That’s the same thing.
The problem is that iPhoto needs to make a movie of the slideshow to export. This inevitably involves compression. Then, when iDVD prepares the movie for burning, it also compresses. Many folks find the quality drop off too great when the material is doubly compressd.
One solution is to create the Slideshow in iDVD, though that has limitations too - no Ken Burns effect, fo instance. But there’s only one layer of compression.
Another way is to create the Movie in +as high a quality as possible+. Some ways to do this: Export the slideshow from iPhoto using the new high quality options. Alternatively, use another app that has more export options - PhotoToMovie, Final Cut Express, perhaps even iMovie HD - to get a high quality movie, and so minimise the impact of the compression.
Regards
TD

Which is better quality for watching a pre downloaded movie airplay or HMDI?

I have the new Retnia. I have an apple tv and high quality HDMI cable. If I want watch a 900P movie from my laptop to my up to 1080p tv which would be more reliable/better quality? BTW the movie is predownloaded so it WOULD NOT be streamming.
Thanks!

My guess is the HDMI cable will yield better quality than AirPlay. Since you already have an HDMI cable and a Mac that supports AirPlay, why not try both for yourself then report back here with your results?

How to i resize a larger 72ppi image to better quality smaller image but for correct size to paste into flyer

Hi, I am trying to resize a larger 16cm wide image saved at 72dpi to a smaller better quality 5cm wide image for invites for an art exhibition I am having. I figure there must be lots of information in the pic given that it is large, I just want to condense it into a smaller image. If I adjust the size to 5 cm wide it changes the dpi to 230 which would be better for printing (the 72 dpi is way too grainy). However when I paste it into the flyer I am making in photoshop it pastes as a massive picture. I then tried to drag the corners in to make it the right size and it became even grainier than a 5cm wide 72dpi image. I hope that makes sense to someone. So basically I need a 5cm wide document size that I can put in my small flyer that is the best quality I can make it! Thanks in advance!

Up-sampling from 72ppi to 300-600ppi can result in blurry images. It's always best to start with a good quality, high resolution image if you can. Go to Image > Image Size. When up-sampling, use Bicubic Smoother setting. When down-sampling, use Bicubic Sharper. See screenshot.
Nancy O.

How to make sound better quality?

So I exported a preview of my animation but the sound isn't high quality. How can I make it better quality? It doesn't sound like when I press Enter in Flash CS5.

Go to the publish preferences and see what bit rate is set for the compression of the audio. Be sure to check both stream and event.

Image display QUALITY controll bar/change/modifi

Hello
the bridges display quality of jpegs and raw images is awfull!!!
i see blockiness in all of my images, how can i watch my photos like this??
there is no crispness!
u should made a picture display quality controll bar like speed-------quality
so the user can select!

Frosti,
This request has been made many times. The development team are aware of the need for 100% previews. However, such a feature, if provided, will not be available until at least Bridge 2. Based on previous upgrade cycles that would be late 2006, at earliest. In the meantime you might consider providing more information on the type of images you're trying to preview (i.e. Raw, JPG, etc).
Also, I would suggest that you soften the tone of your comments otherwise you'll find yourself with Read Only access.
IanLyons
Forum Host

Is m4v better quality than a remuxed MKV file via Subler?

I'm slowly building my home media server and putting my Blu-Ray's onto it. I normally do a Handbrake conversion for ATV3, so the MKV files end up being significantly smaller m4v's and the quality is outstanding. But I recently learned about the quick remux method using Subler, which quickly converts the MKV container into an m4v container without any quality loss and while keeping the same size file. But I noticed that, say, a 29GB MKV file is a much poorer softer picture on my plasma TV than the same movie that's only a 9GB MKV file (remuxed to m4v with subler for streaming over ATV3). I'm running a 300mbps cable modem so the streaming shouldn't be a problem over my home wifi. But I also noticed that the smaller m4v's (say a 3.5GB file that comes from a 9GB MKV file via Handbrake) seem to be slightly better quality than the 9GB file that was remuxed. So it seems like the larger file should be even higher quality -- but I'm getting better results with a smaller file that's Handbrake'd from MKV to m4v.
Is there some sort of streaming setting on the ATV3 that needs to be set or adjusted that will allow the full gorgeous pic quality of a 29GB file to stream right through to it, and look better than the Handbrake'd m4v file? It feels like there's a bottleneck somewhere that's not letting all of the complete picture information through, and an intact, perfect 29GB file should look light years better than that 29GB file Handbrake'd down to 4GB. Trying to figure this out before I continue down this home media server path cuz it's a lot of work to do these Blu's one at a time.
Kirby

I have no experience of the remuxing you describe, but interesting observations.
There is nothing you can adjust on AppleTV - it will either play the encoded movie or it won't.
AppleTv's generally playback the h264 codec (in an m4v container) - there are many many versions/levels of this codec and each generation of AppleTv has been able to play slightly more sophisticated versions.
I suspect but cannot prove that the issue you notice is due to AppleTV attempting to support advanced h264 features but making compromises which affect playback quality - in other words it is cutting corners to playback advanced h264 profile features rather than refusing. Handbrake on the other hand has time at its disposal - it has been refined over many years by dedicated enthusiasts so if a simple remux is all that's required i'd be surprised they have not implemented that. Instead I suspect it more accurately processes enhanced h264 features before transcoding into a new smaller m4v file. Equally there might be settings in HB which artificially sharpen or otherwise alter the video which you prefer. I'd compare the BluRay tothe remuxed or HB versions to attempt to decide which was more faithful to the original but even then it would be dependent on the BluRay player's settings in some cases.

What gets better quality for watching video.. airplay mirroring or HDMI cable

I have the new Retnia. I have a apple tv and high quality HDMI cable. If I want watch a 900P movie from my laptop to my up to 1080p tv which would be more reliable/better quality? BTW the movie is predownloaded so it WOULD NOT be streamming.
Thanks!

My guess is the HDMI cable will yield better quality than AirPlay. Since you already have an HDMI cable and a Mac that supports AirPlay, why not try both for yourself then report back here with your results?

Better quality, export specific settings via quicktime or in sequence setti

I am wondering, since I am recording video at 1080 HD on my canon hf10, would I get better quality if I IMPORTED the footage into final cut AT FULL HD QUALITY (1080) and edit in FCP at 1080 and then EXPORT to a 720p setting for youtube OR would I get better quality in changing the SEQUENCE PRESET to a 720p setting in FCP and work with it as 720?

I don't think that there would be any quality difference if you cut in 1080 versus the destination 720. Just cut it in 1080 and then convert to 720 when going to youtube. You'll have a higher res copy for any future use.
If there is any quality difference, which I doubt there would be, it would probably be so minute, especially since it is web video.

Should I Use An External Burner For Better Quality With Macbook Pro?

Hey I have a macbook pro and used IDVD to burn a movie but near the end it freezes and kinda skips a bit and I was wondering cause it takes two to three hours to burn will using an external burner be better quality?

will using an external burner be better quality?
Ext. Burners tolerate burning multiple copies with fewer read / write errors better than the stock internal S-Drive that come built into many mac laptops. Stock drives heat up faster than external burners do for the most part. So the answer is, it's very possible you will get slightly better results with an external burner as opposed to an internal laptop S-Drive when burning back to back copies.
I recommend using Verbatim Dvd-r media and burning from a disc image at 4x or slower for best results.

Can apple put an update for ipod 6th generation so that it gives better quality sound?

I have an ipod 6th generation and i have heard a lot about apple's popular white earphones. The problem is that my ipod don't give enough volume to enjoy music from those white earphones. Can apple bring something new in their updates to fix this issue???
HELP !!!

You must realize that the quality of sound has been compromised by the very fact of compression and equipment. You are never likely to experience the nature of a live event by listening on an iPod. The best solution is to get a better quality of earbuds/ earphones/ headphones to improve the playback experience. The higher quality headphones such as Bose, Sennheiser, Sony have capabilities to counter ambient interference ( Bose noise-cancelling for example), and they have a better quality speaker than the Apple earbuds. This standard issue bit of kit is more of a courtesy to iPod buyers so that they will have something right out of the box in order to listen to their music but they are not the highest audio quality. The best audio quality will cost every bit as much as, or even more than, the cost of an iPod. As for turning up the volume, that is a foolish undertaking that can have long-term consequences on your hearing. Tinnitus cannot be cured! You will live with it unto your last days.

Better Quality Control

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for