Better without .mac than with it
One would think that if ANY server would allow iWeb files to display correctly, dot.Mac's would first. Yes, there's better slideshow implementation - but first I'd just like iWeb files to display the way I built 'em - with rollover links showing in the correct colors, typography not wrapping inside boxes because of padding (type that looks fine in iWeb, that is), etc.
When publishing to .mac, iWeb also stops displaying the progress clocks next to each site after the first upload. Try and quit iWeb, and I'll see a warning dialog box about the dangers of quitting during publishing. Only way to make them reappear is to quit and restart.
After the fun & games we've had with the random duplication (requiring HAND-deleting, yes you read right: by hand) of over 3,000 Address Book entries and 1,700 Safari bookmarks, this is one dot.Mac user that is going to let that puppy EX-PIRE.
And you think that you will have a maintenance free experience with any shared server? Everything needs massaging once in a while.
I left Network Solutions and CrystalTech shared servers for iWeb. Why? I really do not need to spend $200 plus a year on Coldfusion or PHP/ MySql server space. My experience with both companies was excellent but on occasion I did have problems with the database servers. That's why you back up everything. So nothing is fail safe. My .Mac experience has been awesome.
iWeb and .Mac does have it's own issues .... but that is the nature of web design. Try designing a complex site only to have it break in Internet Explorer. Or try designing a 500 line script only to find out that it crashes because you forgot a ; .
The simplicity of iWeb and .Mac sometimes is it's weakness. I am a professional web designer and I have to say I am impressed with what you can do with the product. It's not perfect, but like designing on any server, there are fixes and ways around any problem.
And most of the time the problem is not with the product.
Sometimes things get buggy. That's true in any pc work platform. Most users have great experiences with Apple products. And when they hit a bump, they figure it out. That's the fun of computing.
There are many reasons why what you design may not look the same way when you render it in a browser. Padding issues are common even with hand-coding. Colors may look totally different on different computer screens. You are dealing with many different graphics cards. PC are always darker than Macs. Web design is about compromise. Getting your design as close to what you want as you can. It's not possible to make it perfect.
Ed
Similar Messages
-
Better font check than with Font Book?
Hi,
I have checked the fonts with Font Book. Everything seems to be okay but I still assume that there might be a broken font.
Is there a better check than I as a relatively new Apple user can find in font book?
Can it be that a programm (like Ghost View) copied new fonts into the font folder that are not checked with font book?
The reason why I believe that fonts are broken is that my system cannot display .eps files anymore which might supposedly be related to a broken font.
Thanks,
KurtThere are several good tips on Fonts in the User Tips Library:
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=122011&tstart=0 -
i think things would have been better without this icloud mess......
someone help me like it again.
1). i have more than 1 account set up with icloud. so i deleted 1 account from the settings on my iphone to try and switch to the other account and everything became a huge mess. (on my iphone i LOST some of my contacts, all of my reminders are gone, and nothing is showing up on the ical on my iphone, and only some notes are showing).......
2). everything is still shown on my macbook pro.... but when i tired to go and sync it..... nothing is transfering to my phone........
3). when i log into the 2 icloud accounts i have with icloud(.com) nothing is showing up in there also......
whats is going on..... this is a huge mess for me. i want to go back the way is was like 1-2 years ago. when you can just sync things from the computer to the phone and not have to go through icloud....... ive been struggling with icloud but today just me hate it to the max.
ANY HELP ON HOW I CAN FIX ALL OF THIS.....
THANK YOU VERY MUCH!the version im using is 10.7.5
im not sure what you mean by you second statement. when i open those application on my macbook its on my macbook but when i sign into icloud. i have those option selected.
maybe my problem is im using the wrong ID...... lol.
is there away you can delete or change icloud accounts/ ID's??? -
Why Mac pro is better & more expensive than IMac?!
can you advice me on this:
tell me which one is more practical and powerful for 3D rendering and animation?! why?!
and why Mac pro is more expensive than IMac?! even though numbers in IMac are higher than Mac pro.......
IMac:
- 27-inch
- 3.4GHz Quad-Core Intel Core i7
- 16GB 1333MHz DDR3 SDRAM - 4x4GB
- 2TB Serial ATA Drive
- AMD Radeon HD 6970M 2GB GDDR5
or
Mac pro:
Two 2.66GHz 6-Core Intel Xeon “Westmere” (12 cores)
12GB (6X2GB)
2TB 7200-rpm Serial ATA 3Gb/s hard drive
2TB 7200-rpm Serial ATA 3Gb/s hard drive
ATI Radeon HD 5870 1GB
One 18x SuperDriveApparently you don't fathom or realize what I said:
Better value: Mac Pro 6-core 3.33GHz. You can buy base and throw in W3680.
You can buy a single 6-core like that from Apple and pay $900 more.
I do not recommend 12-core.
I do not recommend the slower 2.66 processor
I do recommend avoiding the 2009 model.
Better off starting with the 2.8 4-core and go from there.
Ivy Bridge socket LGA2011 will have a lot of other features making them the "to die for" but no one knows and I for one would not want to be on cutting edge with any chipset or new revision. Seriously, Apple has always had issues with first silicon whether 2011 MBP or iMac or 2008/2009 Mac Pro. And always takes a couple OS updates. And then things break. And then software has to catch up.
A slower 12-core is not going to future proof. It is going to cost more and not deliver.
For last year we've all been seeing and saying 6 x 3.33.
why I sent you link to MPG site. -
Does iTunes run better on a Mac than a PC?
I have a PC with Vista on it and I am experiencing a host of problems with iTunes. It's to the point where I'm considering buying a Mac mini. I know all you Mac die-hards will probably tell me that's the only way to go, but does iTunes REALLY run better on a Mac than a PC?
I'd really appreciate an honest opinion before I make the $ investment.Almost never Jill.
Windows connects iPods as external hard drives. iTunes sees it as an iPod, but sometimes Windows doesn't. In order to disconnect, you have to use the Remove Hardware function in Windows. Apple stuff doesn't really work like that, though you do have to "Eject" drives. It's a little more straight-forward than Windows.
Software on any system can get funky and freeze or close unexpectedly. However, on a Mac, it tends to not happen as much. Again, the software and the system are made by the same people - so it just works together.
I would recommend heading in to an Apple Store if you can and checking out some of their free workshops about iPods and iTunes, talk to a Specialist or two on the sales floor about why they love their Macs, and then test one out. You can set up a Personal Shopping: http://www.apple.com/retail/personalshopping/
They'll have someone waiting for you (and it's often one of their best).
Also, sign up for One-To-One training at the store. You get up to an hour each week, up to 52 weeks and you'll be able to get self-paced, personalized learning out of it. Only $100 too, so it's a great deal. (and let them know that some guy on the Mac forums told you about it .. haha).
Hope some or all of that helps! -
Hello, I have a Mac computer with NVIDIA 750M dedicated graphics card and monitor EIZO but the problem was there when I was working with Windows and Acer monitor. When I open a file from Camera Raw in PS this is smaller than the screen so I double-click with the tool "hand" to fit on the screen, but the picture loses sharpness and becomes blurry. If you magnify the image even only slightly with the tool "zoom" the picture comes back clear. In Camera Raw instead is always sharp. I solve the problem by turning off the graphics card in PS but often use plugin that need the graphics card otherwise the processing time is much longer. I ask for help.
Thanks.Hello, I have a Mac computer with NVIDIA 750M dedicated graphics card and monitor EIZO but the problem was there when I was working with Windows and Acer monitor. When I open a file from Camera Raw in PS this is smaller than the screen so I double-click with the tool "hand" to fit on the screen, but the picture loses sharpness and becomes blurry. If you magnify the image even only slightly with the tool "zoom" the picture comes back clear. In Camera Raw instead is always sharp. I solve the problem by turning off the graphics card in PS but often use plugin that need the graphics card otherwise the processing time is much longer. I ask for help.
Thanks. -
I have a Mac G4 with a 10.3.9 OS and I want to update without losing any filters from my Photoshop 7. Should I go to 10.4 or higher?
Why do you need to update at all?
In order to upgrade you will have to purchase a retail copy of either Tiger or Leopard neither of which are easy to come by, and they tend to be a bit expensive. And, there's no assurance that the version of PS you now use will be compatible with a newer version of OS X. -
Friends,
I already had an iPad(1) and its full contents (not only the purchased items, applications from Apple, but my all own pics, videos, songs etc.) is normally syncronized with an authorized PC (Windows) computer.
Now, I've bought a new MacBook Air computer, and want to sell my PC. But I don't know how to transfer (or syncronize) all of the contents from my previous iTunes on PC to the new one on the Mac.
When I connected my iPad to my new MacBook Air, I promted, if I want to change authorization of my iPad to the MacBook.
But also got a warning, that the new iTunes will delete from my iPad all my previously syncronized items, pics, videos and music, with the previously authorized iTunes on the previous computer, expect the saved pics from the net.
What can I do just like that, simply to keep all my previous contents on my iPad, but have a new authorisation and a right syncronization, without data loss with the new iTunes on my new Mac?
Thanks a lot for your answer.
([email protected])Here are some instructions that I have posted several times that may be helpful to you as they have been to others. You can simply ignore anything that does not apply or that you have already done.
As Alan stated above - transferring the iTunes library is the best first step. If you can transfer the iTunes library to the Mac, most of this will be unecessary for you to do.
Very Important ....
1. Authorize the computer.
2. Turn off auto sync in iTunes
3. Transfer purchases
The text in italics is from the other thread - non italics are my words.
The following was copied from this thread. This is essentially what you want to accomplish.
https://discussions.apple.com/message/11527071#11527071
1) Without connecting your iPad to your new computer, start iTunes. Click on iTunes. Click on Preferences. Click on Devices. Check the box next to "Prevent your iPod etc. from automatically syncing." Click OK.
2) Now connect your iPad to your computer and start iTunes.
3) When iTunes starts, right click on your iPad under Devices in the left column. Select Transfer purchases etc.
4) After it finishes transferring all your apps to your computer, right click on your iPad and select Backup your iPad.
5) After it finishes backing up your iPad, right click on your iPad and select Restore etc.
6) After it finishes restoring, left click on your iPad , then click on the Apps tab on top, and check the box next to Sync Apps, then click on Apply below.
If everything on your iPad looks good after the sync, go back and click on iTunes / Preferences / Devices and UN-check the box next to Prevent your iPod etc. The only other thing you may want to check is if your contacts, bookmarks, etc. are syncing correctly now. If not, go to the Info tab after connecting and make sure you indicate which features you want to sync with what sources.
Read this thread and the support links as well. There are apps that you can purchase that will allow you to transfer photos from the iPad to your computer. Look at Photo Transfer App in the App store and you can search for others as well.
https://discussions.apple.com/message/13016026#13016026
This support site will help you with transferring iTunes music to your new computer.
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4527
One final note - you may want to leave auto sync turned off - but that is totally up to you. I never did use auto sync. -
If I host with Business Catalyst, will search engines fine me any "better" or Worse than go daddy?
If I host with Business Catalyst, will search engines fine me any "better" or Worse than go daddy?
I am new to Muse and love it! Not sure if the hosting site matters one way or the other.Liam has some great points. Some other things to consider is that google (just talking one search engine at the moment) more than likely know what a BC site looks like and is made of and would know the best ways to index it assuming you use some of the features of BC and not just straight up HTML.
Godaddy is straight up HTML so as far as indexing goes I think BC has an advantage as it is a known system much like wordpress.
As far as IP blocks, bad neighbours, etc only google will know that information and it's not easy to say which is better.
For example if someone on BC spam's there website everywhere or engages in dodgy SEO practises, spambots etc. Their site is going to be pushed down, if you happen to be on the same IP or close to that site you will be in a "bad neighbourhood" and it may affect your site in the short term. This is the case for ANY hosting solution, so take it all with a gain of salt. -
I have Mac Pro with Keynote and other essentials installed. How can I download the same on my IPAD without paying to download.
Try downloading them onto the iPad normally. If you're asked to pay for them, you can't.
The developer needs to create the two versions separately.
(116544) -
Hi Frnds,Small Favour for me,...
MAC OSX 10.3.6 having Boot Problem(Gray Screen with Spinning wheel all the Time) ,How to restore all the files without Mac Startpup Disc,still is not possible i want to download full CD from Apple Site, Is It Possible to Download!, Windows 7 is working perfectly , can i restore any files in MAC OSX 10.3.6 through Windows 7, or i need the MAC OSX 10.3.6 Bootable Files i need to enter the MAC OSX....Hi Frnds,Small Favour for me,...
MAC OSX 10.3.6 having Boot Problem(Gray Screen with Spinning wheel all the Time) ,How to restore all the files without Mac Startpup Disc,still is not possible i want to download full CD from Apple Site, Is It Possible to Download!, Windows 7 is working perfectly , can i restore any files in MAC OSX 10.3.6 through Windows 7, or i need the MAC OSX 10.3.6 Bootable Files i need to enter the MAC OSX.... -
MBP Makes Better Media Center Than Mac Mini
Anyone agree?
Mac Mini (dual core); iMac 5G (20"); PowerBook G4 (12"); iPod Nano (4GB) Mac OS X (10.4.5)Bentley makes a better commuter car than Ford. Much nicer ride to work.
-
HT4623 whT is the differencebetween ipad mini mac ios with mini ipad without the ios.
What is the difference between apple mini ipad mac ios and mini ipad without mac ios?
The question doesn't make sense. There is no iPad without iOS. If you are talking about an iPad Mini and a Mac Mini, then one is a small tablet while the other is a desktop computer.
iPad Mini
Mac Mini -
Mac mini with a 24" display or a new iMac 24"?
Hi,
Since Apple releases the new iMac, and at the same time, updated the mini, I'm wandering where my heart should go.
I like the iMac, a little bit more powerful, better video card and not sharing memory with main memory, better BTO (bigger HD, faster HD too, memory, etc) iSight and mike, and so on so on. I have not seen one yet, but I'm still puzzled by the glossy screen. Many article I read said that it is a like or not based on personal taste and environment you put it in. I bought a Sony display 2-3 years ago, which I returned, because of the glossy screen. The images were very clean and very fun too work on, but I could not endure to see my face in the screen continuously. That's what I'm afraid about the new iMac.
So far so good, I read the article on http://www.macworld.com that compare the new mini C2D with an iMac, and while it is less performant it is still a good performer. Only a few points below the iMac. So...
Choosing a mini with a 24" of my choice with the same resolution as the iMac will cost me around the same (maybe a few hundred $ less), but I'll have a smaller/slower HD and not a dedicated video card. I'm wandering if the larger screen resolution will affect the mini performance? Sure, for the HD space, I can use an external HD on firewire. Maybe even boot from it and use the internal and slower disk for backups (like TimeMachine for instance).
I do not play game, or very occasionally, I'm doing iLife/iWork stuff, and Internet surfing. I want the larger screen, as I like to have spaces to play with, but I'm afraid the mini will suffer the higher resolution.
In the long run, the display will stay mine, when I ever decide to change my computer, while buying the iMac mean I'll drop the display and buy a new one. There's pros and cons to all of this...
So I'd like to heard from people having the new (or even older) mini to let me your impression of what you feel about this.
Thanks in advance.If you are not able to actually examine an iMac carefully before you buy, the risk that the glossy screen may not suit you is a real issue which has to be considered. Imagine that you bought one and found it to have the same problem as the Sony display you tried and had to return?
Ultimately, the actual performance of the system is remarkably unimportant in most situations. The majority of users and uses would not show markedly different operability between a brand new Mac Pro and older G5, even though in terms of specification and benchmarking, the two are like chalk and cheese. The fact is that while the Mac Pro would be greatly faster, OS and software, not to mention the user him or herself, are all quite inefficient.
What that means is that the difference in performance between the iMac and the mini is certainly measurable, and in use would show itself in some ways (the iMac would run smoother for example) but without the ability to sit them side by side, as a user you'd really never know. Bearing in mind that the new minis are way faster than the old G5s which were themselves screamingly fast when they were in production (and still are), it's hard to imagine that a mini would fail to impress.
And since the actual performance of the system isn't all that crucial, what IS vital is to ensure that the system you buy is usable. The devices that matter most in that respect are the bits you, as the user, interface with. Keyboards and mice are reasonably cheap and easy to change, but displays are not when they are fixed and integral to the system.
The downside of the mini is twofold: Firstly that the internal drive is 5400rpm, thus relatively slow. In reality this really doesn't matter all that much, particularly not if you go for 2Gb RAM. It's been criticized for it's speed, but on the other hand, it's the same as the best laptops, users of which don't seem to have problems with the drive speed. It can be got around of course with a fast external drive, used to boot the system.
Secondly, the integrated graphics - not because that's really limiting in any absolute sense (except for gamers) but because as time goes by, more and more of the top-end software is likely to exclude systems with integrated graphics from their minimum specification list. There aren't many like that yet, and it's hardly likely to be a widespread problem, but it does mean you have to consider what software you want to run as part of the equation.
If I were in your situation, I'd not consider spending money until I had looked at the iMac and given myself some time to work with one. The fact it has a glossy screen doesn't mean it WILL have the same problem as the Sony display had, and slight changes in the ergonomics of your desk with the iMac on it rather than the system with the Sony display previously may mean that even if it did prove reflective, it may be far less of a problem (or more of course). I would look to buy the best system with the best specification that fit within my budget (after all, it has to meet your needs for some time, even as they change), thus if the iMac screen was good, that would be the system I'd go for. If there were any sense that the reflective properties of the screen were going to be a problem, I'd dismiss it as an option immediately, and focus on either the lowest cost Mac Pro if one of those were within the budget, and if not, a Mac mini with bumped up RAM and your choice of screen. -
I took 6 panorama shots of a scene and used CC to Photomerge them as one. Couldn't see where to automatic blend the edges and there was 'stitch' lines when the images were merged. So i did the same in Elements 11 and it was perfect. Am i doing something wrong in CC or perhaps not doing something at all?
Any help, please?
DaveHi - Thanks for taking the time to reply and i appreciate the remarks- if a little harsh- we all have to start somewhere and i am fully aware of the limitations of Elements which is why i decided to add CC to my software. I can only say that if an inferior quality software from Adobe does the job well then CC must also be suited to doing the same which is why i can only think, from your comments, that i have not done something simple- however- following tutorials to get to the end result should have sufficed- it didn't so perhaps i will consider posting the difference between the two applications- and, perhaps suffer a few more 'harsh' comments. The learning curve is quite steep and i am a visual learner, but i'm also not totally incompetent:)
Kind Regards
Dave Munn
Original message----
From : [email protected]
Date : 02/02/2015 - 06:45 (GMTST)
To : [email protected]
Subject : why is elements better at photomerge than CC- CC does not appear to automatically fill image based on content but elements does when merging a panorama. Also the stitching is visable in CC but almost perfect in elements- why?
why is elements better at photomerge than CC- CC does not appear to automatically fill image based on content but elements does when merging a panorama. Also the stitching is visable in CC but almost perfect in elements- why?
created by station_two in Photoshop General Discussion - View the full discussion
First a clarification: you are not addressing Adobe here in these user forums. You are requesting help from volunteers users just like you who give their time free of charge. No one has any obligation to answer your questions.
I'll give it my best shot anyway.
Few folks in this forum are really familiar with Elements, for which there's a dedicated, totally separate forum.
Different engineering teams, also.
From this perspective, it will be difficult to give you a direct answer to your "why?" question.
Personally, I blend very large panorama shots in Photoshop proper since I can't even remember when without any issues whatsoever, up to and including in Photoshop CS6 13.0.6.
Without being at your computer and without looking at your images, I couldn't even begin to speculate what you are doing wrong in Photoshop, which I suspect you are. The least you could show is post examples from your panoramas that have gone wrong.
I can tell you that panorama stitching requires significant overlap between the individual shots, besides common-sdense techniques like a very solid tripod and precision heads.
The only version of Elements I have ever used for any significant time was Elements 6 for Windows, which I bought in 2008 to use on a PC (I've been an avid Mac user for 30 years). I found Elements so limited and so bad that I successfully demanded a refund from Adobe. IU mention this only to emphasize that I can truly only address your question from a Photoshop (proper) and Mac user point of view. I couldn't care less about Elements, but if you have comparison examples of panoramas processed in both applications, by all means post those two.
Generally speaking Photoshop is a professional level application that makes no apologies for its very long and steep learning curve, while Photoshop has many hand-holding features for amateurs and beginners.
Perhaps the bottom line is that you should stick with Elements if you personally manage to get better results there.
If the reply above answers your question, please take a moment to mark this answer as correct by visiting: https://forums.adobe.com/message/7152397#7152397 and clicking ‘Correct’ below the answer
Replies to this message go to everyone subscribed to this thread, not directly to the person who posted the message. To post a reply, either reply to this email or visit the message page:
Please note that the Adobe Forums do not accept email attachments. If you want to embed an image in your message please visit the thread in the forum and click the camera icon: https://forums.adobe.com/message/7152397#7152397
To unsubscribe from this thread, please visit the message page at , click "Following" at the top right, & "Stop Following"
Start a new discussion in Photoshop General Discussion by email or at Adobe Community
For more information about maintaining your forum email notifications please go to https://forums.adobe.com/thread/1516624.
Maybe you are looking for
-
Your computer restarted because of a problem. Analyzing Crash Reports.
I have a 27-inch iMac (late 2013) running the latest version of Mavericks (10.9.4). The Mac randomly restart at least once a week. Sometimes during use, sometimes overnight. I ran Apple Diagnostic a few times and it didn't find any errors (this was a
-
I need to know the IMEI of the phone
hi there, to release my phone with a company in Spain need to know the IMEI of the phone you buy as this that I have was repaired. if anyone can help me to know how to get it would be very grateful. a greeting. david
-
Hello, Is there a way where I can connect my Itouch 5G to my HDMI tv as like we do in Itouch4G. If so can someone update the store link where I can make purchase of it. Thanks in advance. R/Ganesh
-
To change the defaults headings/parts' values in a FSG Report
Hi, I m making FSG reports in Oracle 11.5.10.2. The default headings Like "Corporate set of books" on the top of the reports page or the "no company requested" at the upper left position are required to be removed or changed. But i m not finding a wa
-
I see that iDVD8 indicates higher resolution pictures can be used. What is the limit for iDVD6 ? I can not seem to locate the information or just looking/searching incorrectly.