BGP Ladel Distribution

Hi,
Does BGP distribute a single label for each route in its global rouring table?
In the case of vrf routes how does this happen?

Oh, sorry for causing confusion. Lets assume X-CE1-PE1-P-PE2-CE2 is our network with IP prefix X behind CE1. Routing information about X (control plane) is travelling from CE1 all the way to CE2, whereas IP packets with destination X are flowing in the opposite direction from CE2 all the way to CE1. PE1 sends to PE2 MBGP updates about network X learned from CE1. The MBGP updates contain the route target and the VPN label to reach X choosen by PE1.
PE2 receives the MBGP update, extracts the VPN label and hands this - together with the LDP label to reach PE1 - over to CEF building the label stack. Additionally CE2 will get a routing update about X.
In my example PE2 is the receiving router with respect to control plane information, i.e. MBGP routing updates.
PE1 is the receiving router with respect to the data plane, i.e. labeled packets. It will make a LFIB lookup when handling packets.
Hopefully this clarifies more than it confuses.
regards
Martin

Similar Messages

Query on BGP route distribution

Hello Everyone
In the below scenario (GNS3), IBGP peering enabled between R1-R2, R1-R3, R2-R3 and EBGP peering enabled between R2-R4,R3-R5,R4-R6,R5-R7. OSPF enabled as IGP. Scenario attached for reference.
The problem I've observed in R1 is not getting entire BGP routing table for destinations 30.x.x.x/40.x.x.x.
I'm able to see only best routes in R1 BGP routing table, but alternate valid routes are not visible in its topology table.
R1#sh ip bgp
BGP table version is 81, local router ID is 100.100.2.1
*>i30.30.1.0/24     10.10.1.2                0    100      0 200 300 ?
*>i30.30.2.0/24     10.10.1.2                0    100      0 200 300 ?
*>i40.40.1.0/24     10.10.2.2                0    100      0 200 400 i
*>i40.40.2.0/24     10.10.2.2                0    100      0 200 400 i
*> 100.100.1.0/24   0.0.0.0                  0         32768 i
*> 100.100.2.0/24   0.0.0.0                  0         32768 i
More confusing part to me is when I disable IBGP peering between R2-R3 or shutdown interface between R2-R3 or else if I disable ospf in R1,R2 & R3 routers , I'm able to see both best route and alternate valid route in BGP topology table.
R1#sh ip bgp

Hi Milin & Renan,
Thanks for your replies. To narrow down the problem, I’ve shut down the 40.40.x.x network.
Now between R2-R3, R3 is not advertising 30.30.X.X network to R2, but whereas R2 is advertising 30.30.X.X network to R3. Why R3 is not advertising 30.30.X.X (route via 200 400 300) to R2.
R2#sh ip bgp ( No alternate route)
Network          Next Hop            Metric LocPrf Weight Path
*> 30.30.1.0/24     10.10.4.2                              0 200 300 ?
*> 30.30.2.0/24     10.10.4.2                              0 200 300 ?
*>i100.100.1.0/24   10.10.1.1                0   100      0 i
*>i100.100.2.0/24   10.10.1.1                0    100      0 i
R2#sh ip bgp summary
Neighbor        V    AS MsgRcvd MsgSent   TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down State/PfxRcd
10.10.1.1       4   100      96      98        5    0    0 01:05:50        2
10.10.3.2       4   100      98     100        5    0    0 01:05:54        0
10.10.4.2       4   200     100      98        5    0    0 01:05:39        2
R3#sh ip bgp ( only in R3 we can see both best route & alternate route)
   Network          Next Hop            Metric LocPrf Weight Path
*>i30.30.1.0/24     10.10.3.1                0    100      0 200 300 ?
*                   10.10.5.2                              0 200 400 300 ?
*>i30.30.2.0/24     10.10.3.1                0    100      0 200 300 ?
*                   10.10.5.2                              0 200 400 300 ?
*>i100.100.1.0/24   10.10.2.1                0    100      0 i
*>i100.100.2.0/24   10.10.2.1                0    100      0 i
R3#sh ip bgp summary
Neighbor        V    AS MsgRcvd MsgSent   TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down State/PfxRcd
10.10.2.1       4   100      54      57       19    0    0 00:50:17        2
10.10.3.1       4   100      62      60       19    0    0 00:27:22        2
10.10.5.2       4   200      58      58       19    0    0 00:50:08        2

IPV6 BGP session between ASR (IOS-XR 5.1.2 SP4) to MX480 (JUNOS 11.4R6.6)

Hi,
We're in the process of changing route-reflectors and have run into an interoperability problem between Cisco IOS-XR and Junos 11.4R6.6 on the MX-480 that Juniper is currently in the process of looking at. V4 works like a charm and the sessions come up immediately. The same may be said for both V4/V6 on other MX series devices (i.e. the MX5).
Not wishing to go into too many details, I have two questions:
1. Has anyone else encountered this problem? And if so,
2. Have you identified a viable workaround without upgrading the MX480 to a newer version of Junos?
Doing a hard clear of the session other on the Juniper or Cisco side 10 to 15 times produces a connect most of the time, though it can take longer sometimes. Unhappily this is not viable option and upgrading from 11.4.R6.6 to 12.3R8.7 would require some very complicated planning.
Kind regards,
Andrew

I have similar problem. Did you manage to resolve the BGP-LU prefixes received over eBGP session? In my case as well all looks OK (eBGP LU session up, prefixes with labels exchanged, routing table looks OK), with the exception of CEF:
RP/0/0/CPU0:02-ASBR2#show cef 172.16.20.2/32 detail
Thu Jul 3 14:48:04.746 UTC
172.16.20.2/32, version 393, drop adjacency, internal 0x4004001 0x0 (ptr 0xacba7fa4) [1], 0x0 (0xacba2640), 0x10 (0xacc33754)
Updated Jul 3 14:14:07.206
Prefix Len 32, traffic index 0, precedence n/a, priority 4
gateway array (0xacb63e7c) reference count 18, flags 0xf2, source rib (6), 0 backups
[7 type 5 flags 0x210101 (0xacc38048) ext 0x0 (0x0)]
LW-LDI[type=5, refc=3, ptr=0xacba2640, sh-ldi=0xacc38048]
via 10.9.0.3, 0 dependencies, recursive, bgp-ext [flags 0x6020]
path-idx 0 NHID 0x0 [0xacb0ad08 0x0]
unresolved
local label 16016
labels imposed {16001}
Load distribution: 0 (refcount 7)
Hash OK Interface Address
0 Y Unknown drop

BGP and ASA NAT

Hello Everyone,
I have a need to multihome out two MAN links to the same ISP. The two links will connect via an ISR and will participate in an eBGP adjacency. On the internal side, iBGP will be used to create the alternate default route to the ISP. Each of the ISR’s downstream ports participates on the same Ethernet subnet. On the same subnet/broadcast domain, there are two ASA5510 appliances that will use HSRP to advertise the public IPv4 addresses and will NAT them into the private network.
My question is, since the ASAs do not participate in BGP, and since we are going to NAT the traffic eliminating the need to use a route map to inject the default route into the downstream EIGRP network, would I simply build a static default route in the ASAs out the upsteam interfaces? My initial thought is to not worry about recursive lookups because they are connected via Ethernet.
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 fa0/0; and so on.
I’ve attached a simple topology for reference.
Thanks…Matt

Yes Jcarvaja, HSRP is not a feature on the ASAs, and yes HSRP is difficult to setup natively to support active/active load balancing on any device. That's not really the point though is it. FHRP's are typically used for distribution switches and finely tuned to access layer 2 and layer 3 convergence, unless using GLBP (and even then should be considered). My mistake for using the term HSRP and thank you for pointing it out.
As for the iBGP links, they represent the same subnet as I mentioned. The cat switches are there to facilitate physical restraints as each pair of ISRs and ASAs are two miles apart. Since the ASA's are performing NAT, they don't really participate in the BGP network and there is no need or capability to inject the BGP default route into the EIGRP network. They will participate in the downstream EIGRP network. If the MAN connection on one ISR goes down, then the iBGP route to the Internet will be graduated. I guess I could have indicated on the drawing that these were all a part of the same subnet.
How do I configure the ASA's static default route? Wouldn't I be able to inject a static default route in each ASA using the ASA's outside interface when using active/active? If I have to, I could see if we can use EIGRP on the network upstream of the ASAs if there is no other way of doing this, but this is not preferred.
Any help you can provide is greatly appreciated.
Thank you...Matt

Snmp/bgp traps

Hi
Is there anyway of limiting the type of traps to be sent to a particular SNMP management station? When I enable snmp-server enable trap ds1 e.g., I would only like that type of trap to go to SNMP Server A and not SNMP Server B. Can't think of any way myself?
Regards
Mary

Hi Farrukh
When I type the command snmp-server host 10.50.1.228 traps snmp ? , I get the traps below but not linkup linkdown. The router is running flash:c2800nm-entservicesk9-mz.124-7a.bin. Output of what I see below.
Router_A#(config)#snmp-server host 10.50.1.228 traps snmp ?
atm Allow SNMP atm traps
bgp Allow BGP state change traps
bstun Allow bstun event traps
bulkstat Allow Data-Collection-MIB traps
cnpd Allow NBAR Protocol Discovery traps
config Allow SNMP config traps
config-copy Allow SNMP config-copy traps
cpu Allow cpu related traps
dlsw Allow dlsw traps
dnis Allow SNMP DNIS traps
ds0-busyout Allow ds0-busyout traps
ds1 Allow SNMP ds1 traps
ds1-loopback Allow ds1-loopback traps
ds3 Allow SNMP ds3 traps
dsp Allow SNMP DSP traps
dspu Allow dspu event traps
eigrp Allow SNMP EIGRP traps
entity Allow SNMP entity traps
envmon Allow environmental monitor traps
event-manager Allow SNMP Embedded Event Manager traps
flash Allow SNMP FLASH traps
frame-relay Allow SNMP frame-relay traps
hsrp Allow SNMP HSRP traps
icsudsu Allow SNMP ICSUDSU traps
ipmobile Allow SNMP ipmobile traps
ipmulticast Allow SNMP ipmulticast traps
isdn Allow SNMP ISDN traps
l2tun-session Allow SNMP L2 tunnel protocol traps
mpls-ldp Allow SNMP MPLS label distribution protocol traps
mpls-traffic-eng Allow SNMP MPLS traffic engineering traps
mpls-vpn Allow SNMP MPLS Virtual Private Network traps
msdp Allow SNMP MSDP traps
mvpn Allow Multicast Virtual Private Network traps
ospf Allow OSPF traps
pim Allow SNMP PIM traps
rsrb Allow rsrb event traps
rsvp Allow RSVP flow change traps
rtr Allow SNMP Response Time Reporter traps
sdlc Allow sdlc event traps
sdllc Allow sdllc event traps
snmp Allow SNMP-type notifications
stun Allow stun event traps
syslog Allow SNMP syslog traps
tty Allow TCP connection traps
udp-port The notification host's UDP port number
voice Allow SNMP Voice traps
vrrp Allow SNMP vrrp traps
vsimaster Allow SNMP vsimaster traps
vtp Allow SNMP VTP traps
x25 Allow x25 event traps
xgcp Allow XGCP protocol traps
Any ideas?
Regards
Mary

Distribution of default route of four different ISP in a WAN MPLS

We´ve a MPLS Network, there is a vrf, the Green vrf, in wich are the users, now we are going to have four connections to internet in each one we are going to be receiving the default route, but we want to control the use of that connections, so if you are an user in one PE your default route must be provided depending on the region in wich you are. We´ve route reflectors.
How can we make the distribution of the default route depending of the region in wich the user is, such that the PE_11 gets his default route from the PE_ 1 and not from the PE_3, and the users in the PE_13 gets his default route from the PE_3 and not from the PE_5.
If we put the four defaults route in the vrf green an let bgp works, the route reflectors are going to distribute de best route that they learn, so will be only one ”best” default route out of the four we are having, and we need to balance the traffic.
How can we solve this?
The equipment involved is 7613 with IOS 12.2(33)SRD3

Hello.
If your PE_1, PE_5, PE_6 and PE_3 use different RD for the vrf, RR would reflect all the "default gateways" as they are different in terms of VPNV4 prefix.
So, now you need a solution to prefer one PE over another. The best would be to use communities, like:
PE_1 - injects 1:1
PE_3 - injects 1:3
PE_5 - injects 1:5
PE_6 - injects 1:6
Now regions could have following routing policy:
if community matches 1:1 then
set local-pref 140
elseif community matches 1:3 then
set local-pref 130
Per region you would assign high LP for "closer" exit-point.
Now you have typical configuration per region and failover mechanism between them all.

How to send spool to Distribution List using JOB_CLOSE

Please help on sending Distribution list when job defined using JOB_OPEN, JOB_Submit and JOB_CLOSE
Thanks.

Hi, this is code:
DATA WA_RECIPIENT LIKE swotobjid.
CONSTANTS: gc_objname TYPE oj_name    VALUE 'RECIPIENT'.
PERFORM get_distribucion_list USING    'NAME_LIST'   " name of List of distribution
                              CHANGING WA_RECIPIENT.
CALL FUNCTION 'JOB_CLOSE'
EXPORTING
      jobcount                          = l_jobcount
      jobname                           = l_jobname
      strtimmed                         = 'X'
    recipient_obj                     = wa_recipient
IMPORTING
   job_was_released                  = l_libero
EXCEPTIONS
   cant_start_immediate              = 1
   invalid_startdate                 = 2
   jobname_missing                   = 3
   job_close_failed                  = 4
   job_nosteps                       = 5
   job_notex                         = 6
   lock_failed                       = 7
   OTHERS                            = 8.
FORM get_distribucion_list USING    p_objnam       TYPE so_obj_nam
                           CHANGING p_wa_recipient LIKE swotobjid.
DATA: it_tab LIKE STANDARD TABLE OF soxdl
               INITIAL SIZE 0 WITH HEADER LINE.
CHECK NOT p_objnam IS INITIAL.
CALL FUNCTION 'SO_DLI_LIST_READ_XDL'
    EXPORTING
      dli_generic_name            = p_objnam
      public                      = 'X'
      subscript                   = 'X'
    TABLES
      dli_display_tab             = it_tab
    EXCEPTIONS
      communication_failure       = 1
      dl_list_no_entries          = 2
      owner_not_exist             = 3
      system_failure              = 4
      x_error                     = 5
      parameter_error             = 6
      OTHERS                      = 7
IF sy-subrc = 0.
    READ TABLE it_tab INDEX 1.
    IF sy-subrc = 0.
      CALL FUNCTION 'OWN_LOGICAL_SYSTEM_GET'
        IMPORTING
          own_logical_system             = p_wa_recipient-logsys
        EXCEPTIONS
          own_logical_system_not_defined = 1
          OTHERS                         = 2.
      IF sy-subrc <> 0.
        MESSAGE ID sy-msgid TYPE sy-msgty NUMBER sy-msgno
                WITH sy-msgv1 sy-msgv2 sy-msgv3 sy-msgv4.
      ENDIF.
      MOVE gc_objname TO p_wa_recipient-objtype.
      CONCATENATE it_tab-dlitp it_tab-dliyr it_tab-dlino
                  INTO p_wa_recipient-objkey.
    ENDIF.
ELSE.
    MESSAGE ID sy-msgid TYPE sy-msgty NUMBER sy-msgno
            WITH sy-msgv1 sy-msgv2 sy-msgv3 sy-msgv4.
ENDIF.
ENDFORM.

How can I create a Teststand (1.0.3 or 2.0) distribution without having all of the VIs (6.0.2 or 6.1) in the same directory?

How would I create a Teststand distribution of LabVIEW VIs and maintain the test VI directory structure that I want?
I know that I have to use the application builder to build the custom operator interface, configure it as an ActiveX server, and launch the Teststand engine installation.
The only problem that I have is using the VI packager which puts all of the test code and sequences in a single directory.
This gets quite messy. There are just over 1000 files in the neatly orgainzed directory structure that I have now. (this includes support files, dll's and such)
I have read brief appnotes on configuring the ini file(s) to use
the vi search path that I want, but have not been able to get this to work. Maybe I'm not updating the correct ini? or have to include each subdirectory?
I have currently upgraded from LabVIEW 6.0.2 to 6.1
I am currently using Teststand 1.0.3
I have not upgraded to Teststand 2.0 yet because I have not decided if I want to build at this revision or go through the extra work to mass compile Teststand at LabVIEW 6.1, install the LabVIEW 6i VI Packager Fix, and update the new Teststand LV operator interface with my changes.
At present, I'm not getting the results I want and am quickly running out of time. I have to deliver the project by the 14th of July 2002.
Sorry for the long question and thanks for you help.

Hi,
I dont think the problem is really related to using the VI Packager but more to how the OI interface applications relates to labVIEW File constants.
If you are using the LabVIEW as the ActiveX Server then there should be no problems. But if you are using the Runtime LabVIEW server such as 'TestStandLVRTS' then the file constant would return different paths.
eg for the Default Path you would get 'C:\TestStand\Components\User\RuntimeServers\LabVIEW' instead of 'c:\Program Files\National Instruments\LabVIEW'.
Attacted is an example to show how to change these paths when using your runtime server. Unzip this into your teststand examples folder
Put the INI file in the location of the \user\runtimeservers\labview folder.
Change the labview adapter t
o use TestStandLVRTS.exe. You can run the example sequence from either the OI or seqeditor.
I hope this helps
Regards
Ray Farmer
Regards
Ray Farmer
Attachments:
UsingLVOI.zip ‏20 KB

Cannot find the Recv Logical system in Distribution Model

HI experts,
Im triying a Idoc to file scenario, the logical system for PI and R3 has been already created and assinged for the appropriate clients.
and i ve created the port from r3 using tcode we21 and in PI using idx1 and Idx2. The RFC destination also created for PI and R3 system.. when i created the distribution model using BD64 in R2. when i assigning message type i can give the source logical system and i cant find the Receiver logical system... Also in WE19 i cant find the receiver port (which i created in IDX1 and IDX2)..
Could u tell me how to solve this prob???
Regards
Balaji

Hii Ravi,
Thanks for your reply,
Yes i have created the port (RFC800) idx1 and give RFC destination which points the R3 system.
I have assigned the meta data to that port using tcode idx2.
And I have created port with port name "PORT800" in R3 using we21 and give the RFC destination which points the PI system
when im using the WE19... i gave source logical system as R3 Logical system and receiver logical system as PI Logical system.
now im getting error like "PORT RFC800 DOESNT EXIT IN THE THE TABLE OF PORT DISCRIPTIONS".
Regards,
Balaji
Edited by: Balaji Pichaimuthu on Jul 25, 2009 9:32 AM
Edited by: Balaji Pichaimuthu on Jul 25, 2009 9:32 AM

Runtime error in distribution FM 'CVV5_EVENT_START_DISTRIBUTION'

Dear All,
I am facing an issue in document distribution. Business scenario: PR is created with a doument. PR goes through a release strategy which is designed through a Workflow. When PR is finally approved, Documnet distribution happens. Business object DRAW is called with event CHANGED and hence this FM CVV5_EVENT_START_DISTRIBUTION is called. However this results in a runtime error due to exception 'NO_RELATION_EXIST'. I am not able to debug and find if any necessary parameter is getting missed and i do not have too much information on DMS.
Can somebody guide me in resolving this issue. If any other information is needed then please post it.
Thanking you in advance.
Regards,
Saud

Thnaks a lot. That note is explicitly for this problem. I will take it forward now. Will revert back in case of any issue. Thanks again.
Regards,
Saud

Private app distribution: dev version / testflight / adobe content viewer / b2b distribution

Hi Adobe Community!
I am finalizing an app for my company that is supposed to be distributed only among our distributors. Apple rejected my Enterprise inquiry since our distributors are not our employees. I wanted to sum up my distribution options now and ask you for feedback. I do not plan to use App Store.
1. B2B distribution through apple
I can distribute custom b2b app through Apple, but it is available only in few european countries and this does not cover our needs since we cannot supply to all distributors. Also the process looks very complicated and I'd like to not use it.
2. Adobe Content Viewer distribution
If I tell my customers to download Adobe Content Viewer and sign in with my Adobe ID, the newest version of folios will be automatically downloaded to their devices?
Also on Adobe website it is stated that my folios should be automatically uploaded to Adobe servers - but they are not. From what I read on the forums I understood that it is only available to Creative Cloud subscribers, is it right? If I subscribe will I be able to use this way for as many users I want?
3. Developer version
Finally I know that I can distribute dev version. I will have to register devices UDIDs but they will expire (after what time?) and how many UDIDs can I register (I read in different places that I can have 50 or 100 testers).
4. TestFlight
What I undestood so far is that facilitates developeloper version distribution, but wouldn't I be able to use this tool to go around UDIDs expiration?
Thank a lot!

With DPS enterprise and Apple enterprise account, you can built and deploy enterprised signed app internally within your organisation. Create the app, deploy and host it internally, so anyone who has access to the link can download the app. Not sure if Apple terms allows your distributors from outside your organisation to access and download the app hosted internally within your organisation, check that with Apple.
If Apple terms does not allow, then you can use DPS restricted distribution method to deploy the app on the Appstore, but allow someone access to the content only if they are authenticated via the app, called direct entitlement or restricted distribution. Go here for details: Using restricted distribution with Digital Publishing Suite
Signing in to ACV does not automatically download the latest folio. Your folios are always uploaded on Adobe servers, you cannot host it somewhre else. Anyone can create, upload folios and see the folio in the Adobe Content Viewer. But publishing the folio to be available in an app requires DPS subscription.
You can register upto 100 UDID's on Apple dev portal. I don't think the UDID's expires so long as your Apple Dev account is active but the certificates expires exactly one year from the day it was generated.

Ad Hoc distribution under Enterprise license

Hi,
I have a customer who's workforce has a 1,000 iPads and is interested in distributing their publications either Ad-Hoc or through Internal Distribution, without going through the Apple Store. Are there any issues, limitations using the Enterprise License with Adobe DPS?
I understand Apple has a 100 unit limit on Ad-Hoc using the Developer License.
Tony

Apple has a 100 device limit per provisioning profile for ad hoc distribution. It's a cumbersome method at best and won't scale easily to 1000 ipads.
The correct solution for this type of desired behaviour is an Apple Enterprise license and DPS. This will let you build an app that can be distributed outside the Apple app store, to your employees only. Depending on theneed to control the level of access to content, folios can either published as public free ( controlling access by controlling the app distribution) or published as public/retail using the direct entitlement APIs to provide login level access to the folio within the app.

Public distribution of iPad app, but not in Apple's App Store

I know we can make a Digital Publishing Suite app avalable for private distribution with an Adobe Enterprise account and an Apple Enterprise account.
But we have a client who wants to make an app available to the public for download on a company web page, but not have it available in the Apple App Store.
Is that even possible?
Dave

No.
Neil

Cannot assign an email address to SharePoint group (distribution groups)

Hello,
I configured incoming email awhile back in our SharePoint 2010 environment and it works great. I can assign an email address to a list and the necessary contact is created in AD in the OU I configured for incoming email and of course the item emailed in
is added to the list. However, if I try to assign an email address to a SharePoint group to create a distribution group, the following happens:
The following error has occurred while attempting to contact the Directory Management Service: The request failed with HTTP status 401: Unauthorized.
From what I've found on Technet and other resources, if incoming email works as expected, assign an email address to a group should work without issue but this obviously isn't the case. I've dug around in the 14 hive and pretty much the same exact error
is found there (with just a little more detail):
System.Net.WebException: The request failed with HTTP status 401: Unauthorized.
at System.Web.Services.Protocols.SoapHttpClientProtocol.ReadResponse(SoapClientMessage message, WebResponse response, Stream responseStream, Boolean asyncCall)
at System.Web.Services.Protocols.SoapHttpClientProtocol.Invoke(String methodName, Object[] parameters)
at Microsoft.SharePoint.DirectorySoap.SPDirectoryManagementProxy.CreateDistributionGroup(String Alias, String Name, String Description, String ContactCN, RequestInfo Info, DistributionGroupFlags Flags)
at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPGroup.CreateDMS(String dlAlias, String friendlyName, String description, String[] members, String requestor, String justification, Int32& jobId)
Any ideas what this could be? I'd imagine the timer service account has the appropriate permission on the OU as it can create objects for lists with incoming email enabled without issue.

For the issue with group members who are not added during the creation process ...
I followed this Technet article : Configure
incoming email for a SharePoint 2013 farm
But in the paragraph "Configure AD DS to be used with Directory Management Service", I added
delegation of control for the following common tasks :
Create, delete and manage groups
Modify the membership of a group
The distribution group gets created in AD with members in SharePoint 2013 ! It should work with 2010 as well…
PS : Do not forget to set up these rights, not only for the Central Administration Application pool Identity account, but for all
your Web Applications!

Creating distribution lists in SAP CRM 5.0 business workplace

Hi Experts,
We have CRM 5.0 and I have tried to create distribution lists for
mailsending.
After defining a name and a folder (that is then created) for the
list the recipient list insertion is a following task.
I can search for partners of different type by F4 help but no
matter the type of the partner searched - the type that is
automatically entered to the lists recipents table is "shared
distribution list". even though the desired type is among others
in a list other values cannot be selected.
Please help, is this a setting that can be undone or what might
be a problem in the procedure that i use in creating a list?
has anyone else had similar problems?
Thank You so much,

i have received an answer from SAP:
"The reason for the error is a wrong entry in table TBCS_RECIP. To removethis entry, please use the report which is entered in the description
of note 735795 or delete the wrong entry direct on table TBCS_RECIP.
After the run of the report or the deletion on table TBCS_RECIP you willnot find further the selection option 'Business Partner' on the F4 help."
The entry was removed and for Lists business partners cannot be selected at all - as a standard. really sad endeed.

BGP Ladel Distribution

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for