BGP Redistribute-internal and MPLS

Hi, usually when redistributing from BGP into IGP only EBGP routes are redistributed unless the bgp redistribute-internal command is configured which allows the redistribution of IBGP routes. However when doing the same redistribution on a PE router for a IGP running with the CE it seems that this command is not needed and IBGP routes still get redistributed into the IGP. It works without this command. Does anyone know why this is the case?
I have been trying to understand this for some time now and it seems very trivial however its been bugging me and was hoping someone could clarify. Thx

Hi Vikram,
Well, look at it this way, in the case of MPLS VPN, BGP between the PEs (address-family ipv4 vrf x) is used to transport the customer routes between CEs, and thus it is very logical that it should redistribute all kind of routes (in the case of MPLS VPN the customer routes are always going to be iBGP anyway since they are redistributed from IGP (PE-CE) on another PE - except on the local router when the customer is using BGP as the PE-CE routing protocol) - using another prospective, redistributing iBGP routes into IGPs may cause routing loops to form within an autonomous system, but in the case of PE-CE the redistribution is done into a routing protocol outside the BGP domain (customer side).
I hope that i've been informative.
BR,
Mohammed Mahmoud.

Similar Messages

  • MP-BGP and MPLS multipath load sharing

    Hi,
    I am trying to PoC MPLS multi path load sharing by using per-PE-per-VRF RDs in the network.
    I have a simple lab setup with AS65000 which consists of SITE1 PE1&PE2 routers (10.250.0.101 and 10.250.0.102), route reflector RR in the middle (10.250.0.55) and SITE2 PE1&PE2 routers (10.250.0.201 and 10.250.0.202). PE routers only do iBGP peering with centralized route reflector and passing route to 10.1.1.0/24 prefix (learned from single CE router) with 100:1 and 100:2 RDs for specific VRF.
    Route reflector gets routes with multiple RDs, makes copies of these routes in order to make local comparison to RD 55:55 configured, uses these routes and install multiple paths into its routing table (all PE routers and RR have "maximum-paths eibgp 4" configured):
    RR#sh ip bgp vpnv4 all
    BGP table version is 7, local router ID is 10.250.0.55
    Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal,
                  r RIB-failure, S Stale
    Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
       Network          Next Hop            Metric LocPrf Weight Path
    Route Distinguisher: 55:55 (default for vrf VRF-A) VRF Router ID 10.250.0.55
    * i10.1.1.0/24      10.250.0.102             0    100      0 65001 i
    *>i                 10.250.0.101             0    100      0 65001 i
    Route Distinguisher: 100:1
    *>i10.1.1.0/24      10.250.0.101             0    100      0 65001 i
    Route Distinguisher: 100:2
    *>i10.1.1.0/24      10.250.0.102             0    100      0 65001 i
    RR#sh ip route vrf VRF-A
    <output omitted>
         10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
    B       10.1.1.0/24 [200/0] via 10.250.0.102, 00:45:52
                              [200/0] via 10.250.0.101, 00:46:22
    BUT, for some reason RR doest reflects routes with multiple RDs down to SITE2 PE1&PE2 - its own clients:
    RR#sh ip bgp vpnv4 all neighbors 10.250.0.201 advertised-routes
    Total number of prefixes 0
    RR#sh ip bgp vpnv4 all neighbors 10.250.0.202 advertised-routes
    Total number of prefixes 0
    Here comes RR BGP configuration:
    router bgp 65000
    no synchronization
    bgp router-id 10.250.0.55
    bgp cluster-id 1.1.1.1
    bgp log-neighbor-changes
    neighbor 10.250.0.101 remote-as 65000
    neighbor 10.250.0.101 update-source Loopback0
    neighbor 10.250.0.101 route-reflector-client
    neighbor 10.250.0.101 soft-reconfiguration inbound
    neighbor 10.250.0.102 remote-as 65000
    neighbor 10.250.0.102 update-source Loopback0
    neighbor 10.250.0.102 route-reflector-client
    neighbor 10.250.0.102 soft-reconfiguration inbound
    neighbor 10.250.0.201 remote-as 65000
    neighbor 10.250.0.201 update-source Loopback0
    neighbor 10.250.0.201 route-reflector-client
    neighbor 10.250.0.201 soft-reconfiguration inbound
    neighbor 10.250.0.202 remote-as 65000
    neighbor 10.250.0.202 update-source Loopback0
    neighbor 10.250.0.202 route-reflector-client
    neighbor 10.250.0.202 soft-reconfiguration inbound
    no auto-summary
    address-family vpnv4
      neighbor 10.250.0.101 activate
      neighbor 10.250.0.101 send-community both
      neighbor 10.250.0.102 activate
      neighbor 10.250.0.102 send-community both
      neighbor 10.250.0.201 activate
      neighbor 10.250.0.201 send-community both
      neighbor 10.250.0.202 activate
      neighbor 10.250.0.202 send-community both
    exit-address-family
    address-family ipv4 vrf VRF-A
      maximum-paths eibgp 4
      no synchronization
      bgp router-id 10.250.0.55
      network 10.255.1.1 mask 255.255.255.255
    exit-address-family
    SITE1 PE1 configuration:
    router bgp 65000
    no synchronization
    bgp router-id 10.250.0.101
    bgp log-neighbor-changes
    neighbor 10.250.0.55 remote-as 65000
    neighbor 10.250.0.55 update-source Loopback0
    neighbor 10.250.0.55 soft-reconfiguration inbound
    no auto-summary
    address-family vpnv4
      neighbor 10.250.0.55 activate
      neighbor 10.250.0.55 send-community both
    exit-address-family
    address-family ipv4 vrf VRF-A
      neighbor 10.1.101.2 remote-as 65001
      neighbor 10.1.101.2 activate
      neighbor 10.1.101.2 soft-reconfiguration inbound
      maximum-paths eibgp 4
      no synchronization
      bgp router-id 10.250.0.101
    exit-address-family
    SITE1 PE2 configuration is similar to SITE1 PE1. They both do eBGP peering with dualhomed CE router in AS65001 which announces 10.1.1.0/24 prefix into VRF-A table.
    My question is: clearly, the issue is that RR doesn't reflect any routes to its clients (SITE2 PE1&PE2) for 10.1.1.0/24 prefix with 100:1 and 100:2 RDs that dont match it's locally configured RD 55:55 for VRF-A, although they are present in its BGP/RIB tables and used for multipathing. Is this an expected behavior or some feature limitation for specific platform or IOS version? Currently, in this test lab setup I run IOS 12.4(24)T8 on all the devices.
    Please, let me know if any further details are needed to get an idea of why this well known and widely used feature is not working correctly in my case. Thanks a lot!
    Regards,
    Sergey

    Hi Ashish,
    I tried to remove VRF and address family configurations completely from RR.
    router bgp 65000
    no synchronization
    bgp router-id 10.250.0.55
    bgp cluster-id 1.1.1.1
    bgp log-neighbor-changes
    neighbor 10.250.0.101 remote-as 65000
    neighbor 10.250.0.101 update-source Loopback0
    neighbor 10.250.0.101 route-reflector-client
    neighbor 10.250.0.101 soft-reconfiguration inbound
    neighbor 10.250.0.102 remote-as 65000
    neighbor 10.250.0.102 update-source Loopback0
    neighbor 10.250.0.102 route-reflector-client
    neighbor 10.250.0.102 soft-reconfiguration inbound
    neighbor 10.250.0.201 remote-as 65000
    neighbor 10.250.0.201 update-source Loopback0
    neighbor 10.250.0.201 route-reflector-client
    neighbor 10.250.0.201 soft-reconfiguration inbound
    neighbor 10.250.0.202 remote-as 65000
    neighbor 10.250.0.202 update-source Loopback0
    neighbor 10.250.0.202 route-reflector-client
    neighbor 10.250.0.202 soft-reconfiguration inbound
    no auto-summary
    address-family vpnv4
      neighbor 10.250.0.101 activate
      neighbor 10.250.0.101 send-community both
      neighbor 10.250.0.102 activate
      neighbor 10.250.0.102 send-community both
      neighbor 10.250.0.201 activate
      neighbor 10.250.0.201 send-community both
      neighbor 10.250.0.202 activate
      neighbor 10.250.0.202 send-community both
    exit-address-family
    After this, RR doesn't accept any routes at all from S1PE1&S1PE2 routers, thus not reflecting any routes down to its clients S2PE1&S2PE2 as well:
    S1PE1#sh ip bgp vpnv4 all
    BGP table version is 6, local router ID is 10.250.0.101
    Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal,
                  r RIB-failure, S Stale
    Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
       Network          Next Hop            Metric LocPrf Weight Path
    Route Distinguisher: 100:1 (default for vrf VRF-A) VRF Router ID 10.250.0.101
    *> 10.1.1.0/24      10.1.101.2               0             0 65001 i
    S1PE1#sh ip bgp vpnv4 all neighbors 10.250.0.55 advertised-routes
    BGP table version is 6, local router ID is 10.250.0.101
    Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal,
                  r RIB-failure, S Stale
    Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
       Network          Next Hop            Metric LocPrf Weight Path
    Route Distinguisher: 100:1 (default for vrf VRF-A) VRF Router ID 10.250.0.101
    *> 10.1.1.0/24      10.1.101.2               0             0 65001 i
    Total number of prefixes 1
    S1PE2#sh ip bgp vpnv4 all
    BGP table version is 6, local router ID is 10.250.0.102
    Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal,
                  r RIB-failure, S Stale
    Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
       Network          Next Hop            Metric LocPrf Weight Path
    Route Distinguisher: 100:2 (default for vrf VRF-A) VRF Router ID 10.250.0.102
    *> 10.1.1.0/24      10.1.201.2               0             0 65001 i
    S1PE2#sh ip bgp vpnv4 all neighbors 10.250.0.55 advertised-routes
    BGP table version is 6, local router ID is 10.250.0.102
    Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal,
                  r RIB-failure, S Stale
    Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
       Network          Next Hop            Metric LocPrf Weight Path
    Route Distinguisher: 100:2 (default for vrf VRF-A) VRF Router ID 10.250.0.102
    *> 10.1.1.0/24      10.1.201.2               0             0 65001 i
    Total number of prefixes 1
    RR#sh ip bgp vpnv4 all
    RR#sh ip bgp vpnv4 all neighbors 10.250.0.101 routes
    Total number of prefixes 0
    RR#sh ip bgp vpnv4 all neighbors 10.250.0.102 routes
    Total number of prefixes 0
    Any feedback is appreciated. Thanks.
    Regards,
    Sergey

  • MP-BGP and MPLS

    Hello all,
    I've been experimenting recently with MP-BGP and MPLS. I have no issues with how it works and how to implement and have a fully working lab however I am wondering whether there is a solution that exists in order to create a full mesh without on every PE router having to specify the IP address of every other PE router in the VPNv4 configuration. So the ideal scenario would be that i could add another site to my MPLS which will receive all routes from every other site without updating any configuration at any other site.
    Thanks

    Hi Mathew,
    You can choose P1 or P2 as RR and configure a single MP-BGP session from PE devices to RR. Any new PE that you want to include will need configuraion changes on RR and the new PE alone. You dont need to add configuration on other exisitng PEs.
    You can also play around with bgp dynamic neighbor to further reduce the configuration. But I ahvent used it myself and not sure if VPNv4 is supported.
    -Nagendra

  • Internal and Public DNS conflict breaks mail

    History:
    We set up a new Mac Mini Server to replace our existing Server. The Mac Mini Server is setup behind a Time Capsule, which acts as our router and DHCP server. It also acts as our firewall on the public IP address and forwards mail to our internal server. Our situation is almost identical to the example situation on page 18 to 19 in the 'Getting Started' guide.
    Our ISP acts as our DNS server and they host our public website. They also used to host our mail, but we have now moved the mail to our new in-house server. We asked our ISP to update their MX records to point to our static public IP address. Public DNS records for server.mydomain.com also resolve to this IP address.
    When we originally set up the new mac mini server, the ISP had not yet updated the MX records. I am wondering if this affects how the Server sets up DNS on the local server machine?
    Issue:
    The local server machine on the local LAN is called server.mydomain.com, which resolves via local DNS (hosted by our server) to the server's internal IP address. (The local DNS server was setup automatically by the Server during initial installation / setup.) This conflicts with with public DNS records which identify server.mydomain.com with our public IP address at 205.200.19.225. This somehow causes confusion for the server which consequently seemingly randomly resets our domain (mydomain.com) and host name (server.mydomain.com) settings under Mail settings - which breaks our mail service. (We then edit these to the correct settings and all works again.)
    I spoke to an Apple tech and they advised that we reinstall the Server operating system, using a local server name that differs from the public name. e.g. server.mydomain.lan (local) vs. server.mydomain.com (public).
    *This may seem like a dumb question*: Would it be easier to keep our local host and DNS set up to server.mydomain.com and then rather have our ISP change the records for our public address / IP to mail.mydomain.com or public.mydomain.com? If we could make the change via the ISP's records versus our own, then it would save us a lot of work.
    *A second potentially dumb question:* Since we rely on our ISP for DNS name servers, could we delete / stop the local DNS server for the local network and just use straight IP addresses instead?
    *Plan of Action:*
    Assuming that there is not an easy fix via the ISP's DNS records, then I'll reinstall the operating system and use server.mydomain.lan as the local machine and domain name. If I do this, then what should I be using as the domain and host name settings in mail? .com or .lan?
    Should there be any need to manually configure DNS settings to make Mail work?

    Mr Hoffman and Corbywan - thanks for the interesting and educational discussion. I must admit that I am still a bit confused and would appreciate any further help in understanding this issue!
    *My situation:*
    - Server on a LAN, which sits behind a Time Capsule router.
    - The Time Capsule router serves DHCP and Internet to the LAN and sits on our public static IP Address.
    - Our ISP has set up MX and domain records to forward public requests for our domain to our static IP address.
    - Time Capsule acts as our firewall and forwards Mail and other incoming services to our internal server via port forwarding.
    - Local DNS service is provided by the local server so that it can provide services to the local network. Non local requests are forwarded to the ISP DNS service.
    *The problem*
    We seem to have established that Snow Leopard Server breaks when the internal domain name matches the public domain name, because of conflict between the internal and public DNS which resolve to different IP addresses for the same domain.
    *The solution*
    I am looking for the easiest and most basic way to fix this problem. My understanding is that the simplest would be to reinstall our Snow Leopard Server to a new and different local domain name.
    I am thinking of using server.example.lan for our local LAN domain name - which would be resolved to our private IP address via local DNS on the local server. I would be keeping server.example.com for our public domain name - which would be resolved to our public IP address, which would be forwarded from the Time Capsule to the internal server.
    Now where I start getting confused is this: If Snow Leopard Server requires a Fully Qualified Domain Name to do things like send mail, then do I need to register my internal domain name? And how would this resolve from a public DNS server to the internal private IP address? Or is it more an issue where as long as the internal (albeit 'fake') domain name does not conflict with an existing public domain name?
    *Other items:*
    After setup, I will verify that Snow Leopard Server has setup our local DNS correctly for local DNS service.
    If I understand correctly, I would set up Mail Settings - 'Domain Name' as the local domain name: i.e. example.lan and I would set up the Host Name as server.example.lan - is this correct? Would this work if these are not FQDN?
    How does the mail server reconcile these local domain names with the public domain names? I assume that I need to check the box at Mail - Settings - Advanced - Hosting: "Include server's domain as local host alias" ? Or would I manually add an alias to the Local Host Aliases under the same tab?
    Thanks!

  • DNS Forwarding Same Internal and External Zone

    Hi,<o:p></o:p>
    So we have decided that we want our internal domain to be the same as our external domain e.g. domain.uk. I understand that split DNS can be used
    to fulfil this requirement but is it possible to set up a forward so if the DNS entry is not available in the internal zone it will forward onto one of our external name servers where it can resolve?<o:p></o:p>
    We are basically trying to avoid having to add the entry on both external and internal DNS servers for it to resolve. So far I have added the external name servers to
    the forwarders and disabled root hints which didn’t work. I’ve tried to add a conditional forwarder but it says the zone already exists. It seems the only to achieve the internal resolution is by creating the DNS entry both internally and externally.<o:p></o:p>
    Does anyone know if this is the case? It seems strange that you couldn’t point the DNS to another external name server for resolution? <o:p></o:p>
    Any help would be appreciated.<o:p></o:p>

    You must ask in networking forum
    https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/home?forum=winserverNIS&filter=alltypes&sort=lastpostdesc

  • Delivery report shows status of Pending for external address. Email sent to both internal and external addresses.

    We have an Exchange 2013 on-premise server and seem to have an issue with emails sent to internal and external users at the same time.
    The issue came to light because someone sent an email to 44 recipients, of which one was internal. None of the external recipients received the email. I checked the delivery report in the EAC and found the internal email marked as 'Delivered' and all of
    the external ones marked as 'Pending'. I checked the queues and there were none. I did some testing and sent an email to just one of the external addresses on the list, it arrived. I tried sending the email again to all of the recipients, the external ones
    all showed 'Pending'. I tried it again, but this time excluded the internal email address and all of the 43 external emails were immediately delivered.
    So it seems that the issue only arises when we are sending to both internal and external addresses.
    I then tried a test email to one internal address and one external address. The Delivery report says that the internal address was delivered immediately, while the external address is 'Pending' and gives more information saying: 'Message delivery is taking
    longer than expected. There may be system delays. For more information, contact your helpdesk.'. To add further mystery to this, the email was actually delivered.
    So, I have two concerns:
    First is seems that some emails sent both internally and externally are only arriving internally. This is a huge problem because I don't know how many have been affected. There may be many lost emails we don't know about.
    Second, it looks like I can't trust the delivery report. It says pending for some emails which didn't arrive, but it also says pending for some which did arrive. That is no good at all.
    For info the server is running Windows Server 2012. I have run a Microsoft Update to check if there are any to apply and the only Exchange one is a spam filter update, which I doubt has any bearing but I will apply when I get chance.

    Hi Neil,
    According to the description, I find a related KB on Exchange 2010:
    https://support.microsoft.com/kb/2694474?wa=wsignin1.0
    It has the similar situation as yours.
    This issue occurs because a function in a message tracking component tries to obtain the information for the recipient instead of the external recipient.
    Please try to upgrade to the latest Exchange update to check whether this issue can be solved.
    Also please check whether Throttling has been set.
    Please run "Get-TransportService | fl" to check the MaxOutboundConnections parameter value.
    More details to see:
    Message throttling 
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb232205(v=exchg.150).aspx
    Thanks
    If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
    [email protected]
    Mavis Huang
    TechNet Community Support

  • Verizon bill showing I texted 8012222269 internationally and I did not

      Good evening,
    Some back-story:
    Ever since the "premium messaging" debacle I was involved in with regard to text messaging on my LG Env3 I have reviewed closely all text message charges on my Verizon bill. On the LGE3 I received some spam text messages from some number and ignored them; not understanding I was being charged for these messages I was receiving. I had contacted Verizon before about this issue several months ago because I thought my phone bill was unusually high. The customer representative said it was my premium messaging. Foolish me was thinking ok maybe I sent some high mgb texting or something but the Verizon rep didn't go into any other explanation than that. This went on for a few months more then I finally got ticked seeing $9.99 on my bill for the past few months and I contacted customer support again and this time this Verizon agent informed me that somehow some way my number was obtained from a third party even when I was not aware of it and I must have signed up for some service. I informed him I would never authorize someone to charge me $9.99 on my Verizon bill if I had no idea what service I was getting. He said that this was considered premium messaging which is a nice fancy way of saying 3rd parties can bill you via your Verizon bill for "services" you may not even know you are receiving just because somehow your number got in a roster of contacts that these scheming places use. I googled the number of where the messages were originating and it said something about "Fonesocial" or some such I had never heard of before. The Verizon rep this time said that they could place a block on all premium messaging on my phone and they agreed to credit back six months of these charges because I had called about them before and was offered no assistance or explanation by the customer agent i spoke with several months back when the charges first appeared. (Normally I get good customer service support from Verizon but there are times I get people who are not worth wasting my breath on) Another thing Verizon doesn't state up front is that your phone isn't automatically set to default of blocking third party messaging. You have to take the initiative to do it rather than it being set up that way to begin with which I think is a huge inconvenience and unfair to the customer because you shouldn’t have to go through a mess and receive extra charges before realizing “premium messaging” in Verizon language means “we are going to let 3rd parties text you absolute junk and charge you crazy fees then pay them while we charge your bill oh and by the way we don’t really bother to ask you if you are aware of how you got signed up for this 3rd party’s service or if you even know what you are getting”
    Now....to my current issue that I wonder if anyone else has...In October I upgraded to the Apple Iphone 4. I was reviewing my recent bill and noted that I incurred $2.50 of text message charges when I have an unlimited text plan. The bill charge details gave off the appearance that these were international text messages. My thought was that when I switched to the iphone and changed data plans my block of premium messaging got removed and I was incurring text messages from this number. I called and spoke with a Verizon customer service rep today and she said that the messages were sent from my phone. I informed her I did not send the messages I do not know anyone internationally and I would not be texting internationally. I asked if I had the premium message block on and she said that yes the block was still on and she could block me from receiving text messages and calls but that she could not place a block on a text message I sent. I said again, ma’am I did not send these. She said she would try to get me some type of customer courtesy credit for the $2.50 and I said it is $2.50 that’s not a lot but my point I’m trying to make is that I did not text this number I do not know this number and you can’t tell me what was said to this number in text messages that are stated to be originating from my phone number. The first text message from my bill began on November 26th. I was flying that day…landed in Orlando Intl. airport. Then the 4th of December, two on the 13th of Dec, one on Dec 16th one on the 23rd 3 on 12/24 and one on 12/25. I asked Verizon rep if someone could have hacked my phone and she said if my number was cloned I would have incurred all sorts of phone charges on my Verizon bill so my number would not have been cloned. She said maybe someone got my phone and sent the messages I told her I keep my phone with me at all times and it’s locked. I expressed the concern of what the messages may have said given my current employment situation the thought of having messages fired off to a supposed international number referencing my number as origination point and my not knowing what the messages said causes me great concern. I could tell the Verizon rep was getting irritated with me and I was getting irritated though I kept saying I was not upset with her personally as I knew she was just doing her job but either there was a data validity issue with the Verizon billing service or someone was able to somehow send text messages referencing my number and that was what concerned me how my number could be co-opted like that and Verizon just bill me. She said that I would have to get court order subpoena for them to see what the messages said. She said that at first she thought I was just crazy and then apologized for telling me that but then she realized I must really be upset based on the tone in my voice and I wasn’t just trying to get out of $2.50 charge. I said I was very upset because there’s no explanation being provided as to how Verizon records show I sent texts to a number and I didn’t send them. These were a quarter a pop. Next month what if there are even more $$ involved.  She said she had not had any other complaints like this before but did grant me the $2.50 credit after speaking to her supervisor. Still no explanation from Verizon and I had to say over and over again to the representative that I did not send these messages and there is no way anyone could have just picked up my phone and sent them. I understand that customer agents have to be skeptical of callers saying they didn't do something to incur a charge but I have been a Verizon customer for almost ten years now and I have better things to do than engage in an argument over $2.50 without good reason. I Googled the number 8012222269 and found several people complaining about receiving messages from this number but no one stating that they have been accused (via billing) of SENDING messages to this number. Has anyone else been saddled with charges of text messages to a number they did not send and HOW technically speaking is this allowed to happen? How is this NOT a data validity issue? I am well aware there are people who will take a phone and text but based on the dates and times referenced on my bill detailed charges it is just not possible. I was in a plane in the air when the first message was sent on 11/26 and I had my phone off.  To add insult to injury I think the Verizon rep still things I'm just making a big deal out of this and I MUST have texted this number and just didn't realize it or someone obtained my phone and did it. In other words...no problem on their end I'm just a nut but they appreciate my patronage so they will extend a courtesy credit for $2.50. I have to say...as much as I like to laugh at the AT&T people in my office that have service bars when I've got this great Verizon coverage...I feel a bit kicked in the teeth. Otherwise I would have never signed on to this forum for discussion.  And look, I want honest people who have been having issues with this please if you want to come on here and spam/flame me about how I am too stupid and need to read fine print blah blah just jump off a log I am not going to respond to you and you will not get a rise out of me. The issue here is text messages coming from MY number showing up on MY bill that I DID NOT and could not have sent.  Thanks. 

    You said "The messages i received when i did not have signal are not showing up."
    How do you know received them?
    If the sender got a message that the Messagers were not delivered than they were never delivered and the only way for you to get them is for the sender to resent them

  • Can I split my itunes music library between and internal and external hard drive?

    Is it possible to have music on the two different drives and still be able to make playlists from both drives to put on my ipod?  Here's my situation:  I'm using a Dell 32 bit computer running Vista Home Premium SP2 which I share with other users.  I have a large itunes library (40g+ of music only) that's starting to hog the hard disk space from other users. If possible, I would like to split off part of my itunes library to an external hard drive while still having access to the entire library for my ipod. Ideally I would like to have all my downloaded songs on both the internal and external drives so I'll have backups in case a drive fails, while putting all the music I have hard copies of solely on the external drive. Any help on how this can be done would be appreciated.

    If you manually manage your itues library, you can store parts of it on an external drive, or on an internal drive.  Just keep in mind that in iTunes that you must set a default location for iTunes to manage it's files, and that will be the default location for iTunes to store anything it downloads.  You would need to manuay manage moving things from there if tht is not where you want them stored.
    Perhaps a "better" solution would be for you to invest a little mone into 2 external drives.  One to hold your entire iTunes library, and the second to be your off-line backup of the first.  This is the method I have gone with and I like how it works for me.  My entire iTunes library is on an external (portable) 320GB drive.  Then, when iTunes is not running, I will clone my external drive onto a second drive I happen to have, this way if I have any failure of my primary drive, I lose at most about a weeks worth of content.  For me, I purchase little content during a week, but I do move a fairly large volume of podcasts.  With the entire library being on the external drive, if I ever have to swap to using my backup drive iTunes wil just think that it hasn't run and downloaded anything for a week, and all the "lost" content will be re-downloaded automatically.  This won't work for apps or purchased content, but for subscribed podcasts, it is great.

  • SharePoint 2013 - Office Web Apps - Internal and External Use

    I have successfully installed SharePoint 2013 and Office Web Apps on Azure VMs inside an Azure Virtual Network (IaaS model). Everyting is working well. However, my testing has shown that external users and internal users can't use Office Web Apps at the
    same time.
    Office Web Apps, installed on its own vm, accomodates an external and internal URL quite well. However, SharePoint 2013 appears to only allow one setting for WOPI Zone, either internal or external but not both. I've set the WOPI zone to Internal-HTTPS (Set-SPWOPIZone
    –Zone “internal-https”). OWA works just fine if accessed from inside the Azure Virtual Network. However, if I try to access from outside the Virtual Network, from the Internet, Office Web Apps fails. The exact oppisite is also true. I can set WOPI Zone to
    External-HTTPS and accessing from the Internet works fine, but accessing inside the Virtual Network fails.
    Am I missing something? I, obviously, want Office Webs Apps to function properly for both internal and external users simultaneously.
    I appreciate any help anyone can provide here.
    Glenn

    Hi Glenn,
    To have both the use of Internet and Internal available to your end-users, you first need to configure AAM setting. Open Central Administration > Application Management > Configure alternate access mappings. Let's say there is an existing web application
    named http://sharepoint and my end-users from local network are able to access it using the URL http://sharepoint (root site collection). Here you need to add the Internet URL by select the web application and click Edit Public URLs. Add the Internet domain
    to the web application, e.g http://sharepoint.abc.com. You don't necessarily have to edit binding setting in IIS. Before continuing next steps, make sure you are able to access http://sharepoint.abc.com from the Internet while being able to access http://sharepoint
    from local network (aka Internal).
    On the machine where Office Web App (OWA) Server 2013 is installed, open PowerShell to add OWA module and use the following command to re-create a new OWA server farm if you've completed configuring it previously.
    New-OfficeWebAppsFarm -InternalUrl "http://owa" -ExternalUrl "http://owa.abc.com" -EditingEnabled.
    In this case, I'm not using SSL certificate to encrypt data over the Internet. You can use Internet-public IP of the OWA server like -ExternalUrl "http://198.xxx.xxx.xx". Add CertifcateName parameter if you want to use whether CA-issued certificate
    or self-signed certificate.
    On your SharePoint machine, you need to re-bind all WFE machines to WAC farm using the cmdlet New-SPWOPIBinding. Next, you need to set the WOPI zone for both internal and external.
    Set-SPWOPIZone -zone "external-http"
    Note: I'm not all using certificate in my guidance. But the steps to have it configured is just to add more parameter. 
    I've recently successfully deployed OWA multi-server farm for both internal and internet uses for two big clients. In real-world scenario, ideally OWA should be published through firewall (Forefront UAG, TMG, F5...etc). Please let me know if you still have
    issues after following my steps. My email: [email protected]
    Regards,
    -T.s
    Thuan Soldier
    A 23-year-old man loving Microsoft technologies and making crazy ideas on business journey.
    SharePoint Vietnam |
    Blog | Twitter

  • Front End internal and external web services

    Hi all,
    Can someone explain the purpose of internal and external web services URL in front end server. what does it do and what is it used for? and why the external traffic goes directly to it and not through reverse proxy?
    Thanks,

    They're for multiple purposes.  Address books, autodiscovery, meeting urls, mobile clients, etc.  There are two because they respond slightly differently based on whether the client is internal or external.  External traffic should always reach
    it through a reverse proxy, that reverse proxy should proxy traffic received on port 443 to port 4443 on your front end pool.
    Please remember, if you see a post that helped you please click "Vote As Helpful" and if it answered your question please click "Mark As Answer".
    SWC Unified Communications
    This forum post is based upon my personal experience and does not necessarily reflect the opinion or view of Microsoft, its employees, or other MVPs.

  • How to configure AD on windows 2012 server for Exchange 2013 internal and external email flow

    Dear Experts,
    I have to configure exchange 2013 on Windows server 2012 STD. Company has registered Static IP addresses and can get the MX record pointing to any of this Static IP.  
    The registered domain name is e.g.  contoso.com. 
    a. What should I use as domain name on AD? contoso.com or contoso.local
    b. Is it recommended to have two different servers  for AD and Exchange?
    c. What should be my connector settings for mail flow?
    d. how can I set 2 email servers in company for load balancing?

    Hi,
    a, I suggest use contoso.com as domain name. It is convenient to add urls into our certificate for internal and external mail flow.
    b, Recommended that installing AD
    and Exchange Server on two separate
    Servers. If Exchange Server downed unfortunately, it can prevent AD server from crushing at the same time.
    c, Found some articles for your reference:
    Configure Mail Flow and Client Access
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj218640(v=exchg.150).aspx
    Configuring Outbound Mail Flow in Exchange Server 2013
    http://exchangeserverpro.com/configuring-outbound-mail-flow-in-exchange-server-2013/
    d, Load Balancing
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj898588(v=exchg.150).aspx
    Hope it is helpful
    Thanks
    Mavis
    Mavis Huang
    TechNet Community Support

  • Leopard.  Did a full restore from Time Machine.  Now I can't access my other internal and external drives.  I get the following error: The folder "Capture Video" can't be opened because you don't have permission to see its contents.

    Leopard.  Did a full restore from Time Machine.  Now I can't access my other internal and external drives.  I get the following error: The folder “Capture Video” can’t be opened because you don’t have permission to see its contents.  I have repaired permissions pn the main harddrive.  When I try too click on a disk I get the previously stated error.  I can't even open up information to see what permission/access there is.  It simply will not let me see the content.  It shows the content of my main hard drive when I have clicked the other harddrive's name.

    Solved:
    sudo chflags 0 /Volumes/"FCP Time Machine BU"
    sudo chown 0:80 /Volumes/"FCP Time Machine BU"
    sudo chmod 775 /Volumes/"FCP Time Machine BU"
    sudo chmod -N /Volumes/"FCP Time Machine BU"

  • Cisco ISE with both internal and External RADIUS Server

    Hi
    I have ISE 1.2 , I configured it as management monitor and PSN and it work fine
    I would like to know if I can integrate an external radius server and work with both internal and External RADIUS Server simultanously
    So some computer (groupe_A in active directory ) will continu to made radius authentication on the ISE internal radius and other computer (groupe_B in active directory) will made radius authentication on an external radius server
    I will like to know if it is possible to configure it and how I can do it ?
    Thanks in advance for your help
    Regards
    Blaise

    Cisco ISE can function both as a RADIUS server and as a RADIUS proxy server. When it acts as a proxy server, Cisco ISE receives authentication and accounting requests from the network access server (NAS) and forwards them to the external RADIUS server. Cisco ISE accepts the results of the requests and returns them to the NAS.
    Cisco ISE can simultaneously act as a proxy server to multiple external RADIUS servers. You can use the external RADIUS servers that you configure here in RADIUS server sequences. The External RADIUS Server page lists all the external RADIUS servers that you have defined in Cisco ISE. You can use the filter option to search for specific RADIUS servers based on the name or description, or both. In both simple and rule-based authentication policies, you can use the RADIUS server sequences to proxy the requests to a RADIUS server.
    The RADIUS server sequence strips the domain name from the RADIUS-Username attribute for RADIUS authentications. This domain stripping is not applicable for EAP authentications, which use the EAP-Identity attribute. The RADIUS proxy server obtains the username from the RADIUS-Username attribute and strips it from the character that you specify when you configure the RADIUS server sequence. For EAP authentications, the RADIUS proxy server obtains the username from the EAP-Identity attribute. EAP authentications that use the RADIUS server sequence will succeed only if the EAP-Identity and RADIUS-Username values are the same.

  • Setup internal and external DNS namespaces best practice

    Is external name space (e.g. companydomain.com) and internal name space (e.g. corp.companydomain.com or companydomain.local) able to run on the same DNS server (using Microsoft Windows DNS servers)?
    MS said it is highly recommended to use a subdomain to handle internal name space - say corp.companydomain.com if the external namespace is companydomain.com.  How shall this be setup?  Shall I create my ADDS domain as corp.companydomain.com directly
    or companydomain.com then create a subdomain corp?
    Thanks in advanced.
    William Lee
    Honf Kong

    Is external name space (e.g. companydomain.com) and internal name space (e.g. corp.companydomain.com or companydomain.local)
    able to run on the same DNS server (using Microsoft Windows DNS servers)?
    Yes, it is technically feasible. You can have both of them running on the same DNS server(s). Just only your public DNS zone can be published for external resolution.
    MS said it is highly recommended to use a subdomain to handle internal name space - say corp.companydomain.com
    if the external namespace is companydomain.com.  How shall this be setup?  Shall I create my ADDS domain as corp.companydomain.com directly or companydomain.com then create a subdomain corp?
    What is recommended is to avoid having a split-DNS setup (You internal and external DNS names are the same). This is because it introduces extra complexity and confusion when managing it.
    My own recommendation is to use .local for internal zone and .com for external one.
    This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties or guarantees , and confers no rights.
    Get Active Directory User Last Logon
    Create an Active Directory test domain similar to the production one
    Management of test accounts in an Active Directory production domain - Part I
    Management of test accounts in an Active Directory production domain - Part II
    Management of test accounts in an Active Directory production domain - Part III
    Reset Active Directory user password

  • Unable to activate internal and external urls at the same time

    Hi,
    We have Configured EBS R12 in DMZ setup as described in Figure F-9 of metalink note 380490.1 ,Option 2.4: Using Reverse Proxy with no External Web Tier.
    refering to 726953.1 Case History: Implementing a Reverse Proxy Alone in the DMZ Configuration - R12.
    but Not able to activate internal and external urls at the same time in this configuration. Only the node where last autoconfig was run getting activated as web node.
    When trying to accees the url of the other node it gets redirected to the url (where autoconfig is last run).and for this error observed is Error Code:502 Proxy Error.The specified Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) port is not allowed.(12204).
    For both external and internal services are UP.opmn status is live no error.
    Using Apache as reverse proxy.
    EXTERNAL Reverse proxy settings:
    s_login_page http://LONWEB01.process.com:81/OA_HTML/AppsLogin
    <TIER_DB oa_var="s_isDB">NO</TIER_DB>
    <TIER_ADMIN oa_var="s_isAdmin">NO</TIER_ADMIN>
    <TIER_WEB oa_var="s_isWeb">YES</TIER_WEB>
    <TIER_FORMS oa_var="s_isForms">YES</TIER_FORMS>
    <TIER_NODE oa_var="s_isConc">NO</TIER_NODE>
    <TIER_FORMSDEV oa_var="s_isFormsDev">YES</TIER_FORMSDEV>
    <TIER_NODEDEV oa_var="s_isConcDev">NO</TIER_NODEDEV>
    <TIER_WEBDEV oa_var="s_isWebDev">YES</TIER_WEBDEV>
    INTERNAL Middle Tier settings:
    s_login_page http://stprojapp01.test.com:8005/OA_HTML/AppsLogin
    <TIER_DB oa_var="s_isDB">NO</TIER_DB>
    <TIER_ADMIN oa_var="s_isAdmin">YES</TIER_ADMIN>
    <TIER_WEB oa_var="s_isWeb">YES</TIER_WEB>
    <TIER_FORMS oa_var="s_isForms">YES</TIER_FORMS>
    <TIER_NODE oa_var="s_isConc">YES</TIER_NODE>
    <TIER_FORMSDEV oa_var="s_isFormsDev">YES</TIER_FORMSDEV>
    <TIER_NODEDEV oa_var="s_isConcDev">YES</TIER_NODEDEV>
    <TIER_WEBDEV oa_var="s_isWebDev">YES</TIER_WEBDEV>
    Are we missing anything....
    Thanks & Regards

    Hi,
    Finally it's resolved...Following is the solution thought to share in the forum:
    The configuration of the E-Business Suite environment for DMZ requires profile options hierarchy type to be set
    to SERVRESP.
    To change the profile options hierarchy type values to SERVRESP, execute the following SQL script as
    shown below:
    sqlplus / @/patch/115/sql/txkChangeProfH.sql SERVRESP
    After successfully completing the above sql script, run Autoconfig in all nodes to complete the profile options configuration.
    It's resolved after doing this..

Maybe you are looking for

  • Unix command Line input and output

    Has anybody used Forte for now window application. Passing values through command line and get put as a return value. I am able to call Forte and pass input values but I do not know who to get the return value. Here is the shell script that I am runn

  • Replace data in csv file

    I am creating this script to search the code of the open file and search this code in a csv file and then change the information in this line for the information contained in the open file, but when the array is written to the file, the value is not

  • T410 System Halted Without Reason

    It is so frustrated that will have to reboot the laptop at least once almost daily due to the system halted without reason. Is there a way / tool for me to find out on what is causing all this to happen?

  • Broken link attempting to download 8.0.5.1 EE for Linux

    The download link for Oracle 8.0.5.1 EE for Linux is broken. Clicking the link on the download page goes to http://download-east.oracle.com/Oracle8051EE_Intel.tgz which returns an error 404 (Not found). Attempting to download the standard edition res

  • HT5648 Is it possible to use Java 1.6.0_39 on OS X 10.8.2

    Is it possible to use Java 1.6.0_39 on OS X 10.8.2