BI 7.0 upgrade prepare

Hi,
following problem during prepare:
I have the sap-erp-2005-upg-master:
SAP ERP 2005 SR2
SAP ECC 6.0
SAP Upgrade Master
Number 51032294
mounted also I tried
SAP NETWEAVER 2004S SR2
SAP Upgrade Master
Number 51032261
to start SAPup
But I got in both cases ->
error : SAP_APPL not installed
and there is nop SAP_APPL in the sourve-rel.We are on 3.50 neatweaver 04
Has anybody has a solution .
whats going wrong ???
thats the content of my source rel:
KERNVER=640
SAPVERS=640
DOKVERS=640
COMPVERS=BI_CONT 353 0013
COMPVERS=FINBASIS 300 0015
COMPVERS=PI_BASIS 2005_1_6400010
COMPVERS=SAP_ABA 640 0019
COMPVERS=SAP_BASIS 640 0019
COMPVERS=SAP_BW 350 0019
COMPVERS=SEM-BW 400 0015
COMPVERS=ST-A/PI 01J_BCO6400000
COMPVERS=ST-PI 2005_1_6400007
DBAVERS=10.2.0.2.0
DBASUBTYPE=STANDARD
rgds mario

manual shoult be more clear it's always a pain in the neck to get the correct cd's

Similar Messages

ERP6 upgrade, PREPARE error

Hello!
Have anyone seen this PREPARE error message before?
During phase RUN_RSPTBFIL_PREP, error message "2EETG011 Kein Upgrade aktiv".
I can't find any SAP note about this specific problem. The source system is 4.6B, the target will be a non-unicode ERP6 SR3, the os/db is AIX53/ora102.
//Fredrik
root@serverX:/usr/sap/put/log:more RSPTBINI.LOG
1 ETQ201XEntering upgrade-phase "RUN_RSPTBFIL_PREP" ("20080923124421")
2 ETQ367 Connect variables are set for standard instance access
4 ETQ399 System-nr = '00', GwService = 'sapgw00'
4 ETQ399 Environment variables:
4 ETQ399 dbs_ora_schema=SAPR3
4 ETQ399 auth_shadow_upgrade=0
4 ETQ010 Date & Time: 20080923124422
4 ETQ265 Starting report "RSPTBFIL" with variant "SAP_PRP_PUTTB" in batch
4 ETQ359 RFC Login to: System="SNB", Nr="00", GwHost="serverX", GwService="sapgw00"
4 ETQ232 RFC Login succeeded
4 ETQ233 Calling function module "SUBST_START_REPORT_IN_BATCH" by RFC
4 ETQ234 Call of function module "SUBST_START_REPORT_IN_BATCH" by RFC succeeded
4 ETQ239 Logging off from SAP system
4 ETQ311 Batch job "RSPTBFIL" with job count "12442401" scheduled
4 ETQ359 RFC Login to: System="SNB", Nr="00", GwHost="serverX", GwService="sapgw00"
4 ETQ232 RFC Login succeeded
4 ETQ010 Date & Time: 20080923124428
4 ETQ234 Call of function module "SUBST_CHECK_BATCHJOB" by RFC succeeded
4 ETQ239 Logging off from SAP system
4 ETQ399 ext. env.: DIR_LIBRARY=/sapmnt/SNB/exe
4 ETQ399 ext. env.: LIBPATH=/sapmnt/SNB/exe:/usr/lib:/lib:/usr/sap/SNB/SYS/exe/run:/oracle/SNB/102_64/lib64
4 ETQ399 2008/09/23 12:44:29: put_execute: (tp) forkpid:2142240
2EETQ241 Errors found in logfiles - accumulated in file "RSPTBINI.ELG"
1EETQ203 Upgrade phase "RUN_RSPTBFIL_PREP" aborted with errors ("20080923124430")
root@serverX:/usr/sap/put/log:more RSPTBINI.ELG
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
PUTTB initial filling ERRORS and RETURN CODE in RSPTBPTB.SNB
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2EETG011 "Kein Upgrade aktiv"
2EETG011 "Kein Upgrade aktiv"
root@serverX:/usr/sap/put/log:

Hello Andreas, old friend from e-motion technology!
I did open a OSS-case some days ago, and we rerun the phase successfully.
I'm now waiting to hear from SAP-support, what they did, with their magic sticks, to fix this issue.
//Fredrik

BW Upgrade PREPARE stopped in JOB_RSUVSAVE Phase

Hi All,
We are trying upgrade from BW 3.1 Content to BI 7.0
Our OS is HP-UX 11.11 and DB - Oracle 10GR2
Now am in PREPARE phase, Its giving error Upgrade phase JOB_RSUVSAVE.
Below is the details of the RSUVSAVE.log file
1 ETQ201XEntering upgrade-phase "JOB_RSUVSAVE" ("20070907173858")
2 ETQ367 Connect variables are set for standard instance access
4 ETQ399 System-nr = '01', GwService = 'sapgw01'
4 ETQ399 Environment variables:
4 ETQ399 dbs_ora_schema=SAPBAQ
4 ETQ399 auth_shadow_upgrade=0
4 ETQ260 Starting batchjob "RSUVSAVE"
4 ETQ010 Date & Time: 20070907173858
4 ETQ260 Starting batchjob "RSUVSAVE"
4 ETQ230 Starting RFC Login to: System = "BAQ", GwHost = "bwapoqas", GwService = "sapgw01"
4 ETQ359 RFC Login to: System="BAQ", Nr="01", GwHost="bwapoqas", GwService="sapgw01"
4 ETQ232 RFC Login succeeded
4 ETQ233 Calling function module "SUBST_START_BATCHJOB" by RFC
4 ETQ234 Call of function module "SUBST_START_BATCHJOB" by RFC succeeded
4 ETQ233 Calling function module "SUBST_CHECK_BATCHJOB" by RFC
4 ETQ010 Date & Time: 20070907173904
4 ETQ234 Call of function module "SUBST_CHECK_BATCHJOB" by RFC succeeded
4 ETQ239 Logging off from SAP system
1EETQ242 Error code "-1" during analysis of logfiles matching "RSUVSAVE\.BAQ"
2EETQ262 Batchjob "RSUVSAVE" aborted
4 ETQ359 RFC Login to: System="BAQ", Nr="01", GwHost="bwapoqas", GwService="sapgw01"
4 ETQ232 RFC Login succeeded
2WETQ360 RFC of "subst_list_sys_logs" failed:
2WETQ361 code/exception : COULD_NOT_OPEN_FILE
4 ETQ359 RFC Login to: System="BAQ", Nr="01", GwHost="bwapoqas", GwService="sapgw01"
4 ETQ232 RFC Login succeeded
1EETQ204 Upgrade phase "JOB_RSUVSAVE" aborted with severe errors ("20070907173904")
~
~
Pls giv some inputs to proceed
Thanks & Regards
Karthikeyan

Claiming no credit for this one - found elsewhere on SDN - Originally posted by Jason Spessert
SAPUpgrade _ PHASE- JOB_RSUVSAVE
For any others who get a similar error...
We had the same symptom, the upgrade from 4.7 to 6.0 was running PREPARE and the background job aborts as shown above saying it cannot write this log to a directory. Looking at the dump (ST22) or double-click in the job log it shows the directory:
Contents of system fields
SY field contents..................... SY field contents.....................
SY-SUBRC 1 SY-INDEX 0
SY-TABIX 1 SY-DBCNT 4
SY-FDPOS 0 SY-LSIND 0
SY-PAGNO 0 SY-LINNO 1
SY-COLNO 1 SY-PFKEY
SY-UCOMM
SY-TITLE Repository Switch: Tool Report for Performing Cleanups
SY-MSGTY A SY-MSGID PU
SY-MSGNO 814
SY-MSGV1 D:usrsapput mpRSUVSAVE.EQ0
SY-MSGV2 No such file or directory SY-MSGV3
SY-MSGV4
It turned out - we were not running the upgrade from D: we had the put directory in F:. And during PREPARE we, as instructed, inserted the DIR_PUT=F:usrsapput into the default.pfl (instance profile).
The trick was that we needed to re-start the instance. While inserting DIR_PUT into the instance profile gets you past the initial PREPARE check, you need to restart the instance so the change takes effect.
We restarted and then resumed PREPARE and it passes the above error as it now writes to the F: directory.

EHP4 Upgrade: PREPARE/INIT/PREPARE_JSPM_QUEUE ended in error.

Hi Experts,
We are upgrading our ECC system from 700 to 701 release using SAPehpi. Our current phase is in Step 3: Configuration. we encountered our error in phase PREPARE_JSPM_QUEUE. Here is the trouble ticket log:
Trouble Ticket Report
Installation of enhancement package 1 for SAP NetWeaver 7.0
SID................: xxx
Hostname...........: xxxxxxxx
Install directory..: c:/usr/sap/xxx
Upgrade directory..: F:\usr\sap\EHPI\java
Database...........: Oracle
Operating System...: NT
JDK version........: 1.6.0_21 SAP AG
SAPJup version.....: 3.5.43
Source release.....: 700
Target release.....: 700
Start release SP...: $(/J2EE/StandardSystem/SPLevel)
Target release SP..: $(/J2EE/ShadowSystem/SPLevel)
Current usages.....:
ABAP stack present.: true
The execution of PREPARE/INIT/PREPARE_JSPM_QUEUE ended in error.
The validation of the deploy queue was not successful.
Validation of queue sapjup-queue completed with error
JSPM version is 7.01.4.2.3. Current JSPM log directory is C:\usr\sap\EC2\DVEBMGS00\j2ee\JSPM\log\log_2011_09_15_10_56_57.
sap.com/SAP-XIAFC: Deployment of archive D:\Download_Directory\EC2_swcomp\SAPXIAFC03_12-20002809.SCA has been rejected because it depends on missing components.
Unresolved dependencies found for the following SDA:
1.: development component 'com.sap.aii.af.ms.svc'/'sap.com'/'SAP AG'/'7.0103.20101203031109.0000'/'0'
dependency:
 name: 'com.sap.aii.af.ra.ms.sonic.client'
 vendor: 'sap.com'
There is no component either in SDM repository or in Deployment batch that resolves the dependency.
Unresolved dependencies found for the following SDA:
2.: development component 'com.sap.aii.adapter.marketplace.svc'/'sap.com'/'SAP AG'/'7.0103.20101203031109.0000'/'0'
dependency:
 name: 'com.sap.aii.af.ra.ms.sonic.client'
 vendor: 'sap.com'
There is no component either in SDM repository or in Deployment batch that resolves the dependency.
Unresolved dependencies found for the following SDA:
4.: development component 'com.sap.aii.adapter.jms.svc'/'sap.com'/'SAP AG'/'7.0103.20101203031109.0000'/'0'
dependency:
 name: 'com.sap.aii.af.jmsproviderlib'
 vendor: 'sap.com'
There is no component either in SDM repository or in Deployment batch that resolves the dependency.
Error during validation. See C:/usr/sap/EC2/DVEBMGS00/SDM/program/log/sdmcl20110915025916.log for details.
sap.com/SAP_XIAF: Deployment of archive D:\Download_Directory\EC2_swcomp\SAPXIAF03_4-20002807.SCA has been rejected because it depends on missing components.
Unresolved dependencies found for the following SDA:
3.: development component 'com.sap.aii.af.mod_trans.app'/'sap.com'/'SAP AG'/'7.0103.20081111115200.0000'/'0'
dependency:
 name: 'com.sap.aii.af.jmsproviderlib'
 vendor: 'sap.com'
There is no component either in SDM repository or in Deployment batch that resolves the dependency.
Error during validation. See C:/usr/sap/EC2/DVEBMGS00/SDM/program/log/sdmcl20110915025916.log for details.
<html>The following <a href="http://service.sap.com/~form/handler?_APP=01100107900000000342&_EVENT=DISPL_TXT&_NNUM=1399846">SAP Note 1399846</a> may contain solution for the problem.
More information can be found in the log file F:\usr\sap\EHPI\java\log\PREPARE_JSPM_QUEUE_CSZ_10.LOG.
Use the information provided to trouble-shoot the problem. There might be an OSS note providing a solution to this problem. Search for OSS notes with the following search terms:
com.sap.sdt.j2ee.phases.PhaseTypePrepareJSPMQueue
com.sap.sdt.sapjup.tools.sapjupjspm.JSPMRapiException
The validation of the deploy queue was not successful.
PREPARE_JSPM_QUEUE
INIT
NetWeaver Enhancement Package Installation
SAPJup
Java Enhancement Package Installation
Please help where i can find the dependency of component SAPXIAFC03_12-20002809.SCA.
Thank you,
Tony

Hi Nicholas,
Is your system ECC (dual stack) or NW?
yes our ECC system is Dual stack
SAPXIAFC is for PI adapter framework core, is this component deployed in your system? Please check at the system info - all component in http://ip:5<sysno>00
no, i wasnt able to find SAPXIAFC in our http://xx.xxx.xxx.xx:50000/monitoring/ComponentInfo
How do you download the SPs? do you generate the xml via mopz? and is your system enrty in SMSY correctly set?
I downloaded the SPs via MOPZ, yes we generated the xml via mopz and transfered it to download directory of ehpi. yes our system entry in SMSY are all correct.
Do we need to repeat the whole EHPI process? and download another XML file? how can i eliminate the unnecessary components in assigning the technical usages in MOPZ? do you have any steps on how to get the exact components which corresponds to specific technical usages? so that i can match perfectly what are installed in my current ecc system (vs) the components that mopz should be downloading?
Thank you.
Best Regards,
Tony

Linking java to SIDADM for an upgrade (PREPARE)

hi
i am facing a problem that someone here might assit me with.I have installed java runtime in preparation for a sap upgrade.i can test and confirm java is available as root but not as SIDADM.is there a file i need to specify the path to Java for SIDADM.i edited .bashrc but no joy as yet.
i get this error :mxt1:mxt1adm 51> java -version
Error: could not find libjava.so
Error: could not find Java 2 Runtime Environment.
mxt1:~ # java -version
java version "1.4.2_14"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.2_14-b05)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.2_14-b05, mixed mode)

This is strange...
I have done the following on one of our boxes:
I edited .sapenv_<hostname>.csh and added the following:
[code]setenv DIR_LIBRARY /usr/sap/<SID>/SYS/exe/run
setenv JAVA_HOME /opt/java1.4
foreach d ( $JAVA_HOME/bin /usr/sap/<SID>/SYS/exe/run $HOME . )
[/code]
Then I logged out and logged back in:
[code]$> which java
/opt/java1.4/bin/java
$> java -version
java version "1.4.2"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 2.2)
IBM J9SE VM (build 2.2, J2RE 1.4.2 IBM J9 2.2 Linux amd64-64 j9xa64142-20061124 (JIT enabled)
J9VM - 20061121_1035_LHdSMr
JIT - r7_level20061020_1803)
[/code]
Markus

Yosemite upgrade preparation

I am preparing to upgrade to yosemite. Should I upgrade iphoto before or afterwards? I have Snow Leopard and iphoto 8.1.2 which I gather will not be useable on yosemite.

léonie wrote:
Telling those users that: "You will no longer be able to run PowerpC applications on Yosemite" is not an appropriate answer.
Well, Yosemite cannot execute PowerPC code, you need to install Snow Leopard as well on the Mac, if you want to emulate a PowerPC using Rosetta. You could as well say, Yosemite can run Windows applications.
Except that 99% of Mac users purchased their Mac to run Mac apps; not Windows apps. And, I will postulate that 99% of Snow Leopard users run PowerPC apps, even though most of them have or had no idea what they were, as Rosetta was so miraculously transparent! So the problem being faced by those who ask about upgrading from Snow Leopard to Yosemite is to make them aware of a problem that most of them do not know exists and then giving them solutions to that problem.
léonie wrote:
Having to run device drivers in Parallels with snow Leopard is not as quick and responsive than running them directly in the native MacOsX. I gave up on Snow Leopard, after trying for quite some time to run my Nikon Scan slide scanner in Parallels, and also an older audio interface was no joy. It was easier to dedicate an older MBP to run MacOS 10.6.8.
You are in the enviable position of owning "an older MBP" that can still run Snow Leopard Mac OS X 10.6.8. Many users today are not in that position.
Take, for example, a college student who goes to class with his new MacBook Air/Pro running Yosemite; they cannot downgrade their OS X to Snow Leopard. When handed a college textbook with a Pearson Educational CD-ROM that was written in 2005, it will just not work on their MacBook. Should they just give up while watching other students using their CD-ROMs, or should they remain competitive?
Giving them the information that they can easily install Snow Leopard Server into Parallels for no more than $99 (and many times even less), will allow them to run these CD-ROMs and keep up with their other classmates.
While it is true, in your case, you can see greater efficiency and speed running PowerPC drivers and software in Snow Leopard on an older Mac that can still run Snow Leopard. However, in today's world of i5 and i7 CPU's running many PowerPC apps in Snow Leopard Server in Parallels is actually faster on these modern Macs, then they were on their original PowerPC Macs of ten years ago.
You will recognize this efficiency when the day arrives that your MBP bites the dust and you are in the market for a new one from Apple but yet still need access to your Nikon slide scanner and/or audio interface...

Upgrade Preparation (Unicode System)

Hello,
I will try to upgrade the following:
◇Sourece system ：ECC5.0 (Unicode system)
◇Target system ：ERP6.0 EHP5 (Unicode system)
I read Upgrade Guide(SAP ERP 6.0 Include SAP Enhancement Package 5 - Technical "Central Applicatio" ABAP Based on SAP NetWeaver 7.0 including Enhancement Package 2 ).
I have a question with regard to No4.14 (Unicode SAP System：Running reports RUTTTYPACT and UMG_POOL_TABLE) in Preparation.
No4.14 say that if your SAP system is a Unicode system, report RUTTTYPACT and UMG_POOL_TABLE must have run before you start the upgrade tool.
However, the following sentenses are written In prerequisites
・ you have not run report RUTTTYPACT and UMG_POOL_TABLE in your Unicode SAP system yet.
Source system has already bee Unicode system.
I cannot judge whether i should run report RUTTTYPACT and UMG_POOL_TABLE.
Please advice me.
Kind regards
Koba

Hello
Thank you for your prompt reply to my question.
Please let me make sure i understand you correctly again.
>The report would not have been run automatically by SAPInst for your ECC 5.0 (NW 04) based system.
>Hence please run the post installation procedure as mentioned in Note 544623.
I think so,too.
But, Upgrade Guide(4.14 in prerequisites) are written following sentenses.
・you have not run report RUTTTYPACT and UMG_POOL_TABLE in your Unicode SAP system yet.
Do you know how to make sure whether report(RUTTTYPACT and UMG_POOL_TABLE) executed before(at installation time).
Regards,
Koba

11i to R12 upgrade preparation and guidance after multiple errors

This seems like a nice place to get some help. The MOS help I have received so far hasn't been so great.
I am trying to figure out how to proceed from where I am right now. Here's what I have:
Project: 11.5.10.2 upgrade to R12
1) Successfully installed MW version 2.18 and completed the 1st four steps under the "Configuration" category (I have not yet laid down the R12 code tree)
- Tried step "1.6-Apply patch 7429271" and it failed:
--- The script being run is "get_from_url_1703_7429271.sh".
--- When running the script manually this error occurs:
--- "Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: oracle/support/mw/AruExecutor"
Needless to say it cannot download the patch.
2) I thought that I might install the LivePatch release 2.19 patch (12728371)
- I tried to install this patch using the "auto-install" method via "Configuration -> LivePatch" and recieved this error:
--- "The requested URL /pls/EOF/eof_manage_livepatch.main_page was not found on this server".
I think that I can install v2.19 manually if need be.
3a) Moving forward should I apply MW version 2.19 patch manually and try again with step 1.6? Is v 2.19 important at this stage?
3b) I can down download patch 7429271 manually but will further patch downloads fail? Should I insist on getting this issue fixed before continuing?
What is the best path for continuing?
Thanks, Chaz

**** Maintenance Wizard configuration Information ****
Protocol = https
Am I going to need to drop the MW schema and start all over or is there some way to change this dynamically?
Another thing that I noticed as part of the HTTPS selection is that it added these lines to these files:
listener.ora:
SSL_CLIENT_AUTHENTICATION = FALSE
WALLET_LOCATION =
(SOURCE =
(METHOD = FILE)
(METHOD_DATA =
(DIRECTORY = /up2001/R12/10g/102/eof/config/ssl_wallet)
tnsnames.ora
(SECURITY=
(SSL_SERVER_CERT_DN="CN=nwb-chi-tdb01.itciss.com, O=Maintenance Wizard, OU=Development"))
I don't think that they were there when I selected Protocol=HTTP.

Upgrade Preparation: How to map applications, DTS packages, SSIS packages and reports to databases

Hi,
I am on the initial phase of upgrading SQL Server 2005 to SQL Server 2012. Right now, I'm taking as much inventory as I can from our current server, SQL Server 2005. If anyone could help me, how can I map the following:
Map applications to databases
Map DTS packages to databases
Map SSIS packages to databases
Map reports to databases
Thank you!

Some questions and suggestions:
How are we planning to upgrade whether in-place\parallel\others?
Will this be with HA[Clustered one] or with standalone?
Do you have time to do actual migration from now on and you will need to setup the environment for end to end testing for application validation so that all differences between application or system variables can be known before actual deployment?
Also, it will be good to check with Upgrade Advisor for below pointers preparedness too.
Map applications to databases: If you have already need to setup databases and logins for each and every applications then your mapping to database for applications will be lot easier and you will have less challenge.
Map DTS packages to databases: Good link to check
https://www.simple-talk.com/sql/ssis/dts-to-ssis-migration/
Map SSIS packages to databases: Good link to check
http://www.experts-exchange.com/Database/MS-SQL-Server/Q_28340818.html http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic1531839-2799-1.aspx
Map reports to databases -- Good link for Reporting Services if you meant that:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms143747.aspx
http://www.mssqltips.com/sqlservertip/2627/migrating-sql-reporting-services-to-a-new-server/
Good link to check other thing as well :
http://thomaslarock.com/2013/03/upgrading-to-sql-2012-ten-things-you-dont-want-to-miss/
Santosh Singh

Error Message: "This upgrade path is not supported"

Scenario
During the process of upgrade to Windows 10 Technical Preview, we may encounter the error “This upgrade path is not supported. Please close Setup and re-launch from the root of the media or go back and pick a different installation
choice.” in the Compatibility report.
Analysis
Step 1: Perform the scenario 1: the upgrade installation fails.
Reproduce this error following the steps below:
Download the Windows 10 Technical Preview ISO installation file.
Extract the ISO installation file to C:\New folder, and now the location of the installation file is
C:\New folder\9841.0.140912-1613.FBL_RELEASE_CLIENTENTERPRISE_VOL_X64FRE_EN-US\.
Click setup.exe from the installation file, and then click
Install now.
Setup is starting, and then get two options Upgrade and
Custom which is the classic setup wizard which we can see during booting from DVD.
Click Upgrade to run upgrade installation, however, the error occurs.
It seems that it is impossible to perform upgrade installation to Windows 10 Technical Preview, although it is fine to click
Custom to perform clean installation which cannot keep the personal setting and applications.
However, what we want is upgrade installation, not clean installation.
Step 2: Perform the scenario 2: the upgrade installation works fine.
If extract the ISO installation to C:\New in the above step2, click the
setup.exe from the installation file C:\New\9841.0.140912-1613.FBL_RELEASE_CLIENTENTERPRISE_VOL_X64FRE_EN-US\, the upgrade installation would work fine, which is as shown the following two figures:
Step 3: Check the setupact.log
file which contains information about setup actions during the installation of the two scenarios.
Scenario 1: Check the setupact.log file of the scenario 1. The detailed information is shown as below:
2014-10-14 19:03:40, Info UI Determining whether we should run ConX or legacy setup
2014-10-14 19:03:42, Info UI Will launch ConX setup experience
2014-10-14 19:03:42, Info UI Launching ConX setup experience
2014-10-14 19:03:42, Info UI Launching C:\New folder\9841.0.140912-1613.FBL_RELEASE_CLIENTENTERPRISE_VOL_X64FRE_EN-US\Sources\SetupPrep.exe
2014-10-14 19:03:44, Info UI Unknown command line for ConX setup experience. Launching legacy setup experience.
2014-10-14 19:03:44, Info UI Determining if we are in WDS/Unattend mode
2014-10-14 19:03:44, Info UI No need to hide autorun
2014-10-14 19:03:44, Info [0x0a000a] UI Autorun:Autorun core successfully initialized!!!
2014-10-14 19:03:44, Info [0x0a000b] UI Autorun:Autorun UI successfully initialized!!!
2014-10-14 19:03:44, Info UI AppWindow has layout style 0
2014-10-14 19:03:45, Info UI NavWindow has layout style 0
2014-10-14 19:03:45, Info [0x0a011c] UI WizardDialogPost::SetActive
2014-10-14 19:04:57, Info [0x0a018e] UI Passing command line parameter ("C:\New folder\9841.0.140912-1613.FBL_RELEASE_CLIENTENTERPRISE_VOL_X64FRE_EN-US\Sources\setup.exe /HideWelcome /uilanguage:en-US /targetlanguage:en-US") to IBS.
Scenario 2: Check the setupact.log file of the scenario 2. The detailed information is shown as below:
2014-10-14 19:08:04, Info UI Determining whether we should run ConX or legacy setup
2014-10-14 19:08:05, Info UI Will launch ConX setup experience
2014-10-14 19:08:05, Info UI Launching ConX setup experience
2014-10-14 19:08:05, Info UI Launching C:\New\9841.0.140912-1613.FBL_RELEASE_CLIENTENTERPRISE_VOL_X64FRE_EN-US\Sources\SetupPrep.exe
According to the two logs, we can get the following points:
In scenario 1, it would invoke the SetupPrep.exe in the source folder directly to perform an installation preparation. However, it failed to recognize the path
C:\New folder\9841.0.140912-1613.FBL_RELEASE_CLIENTENTERPRISE_VOL_X64FRE_EN-US\Sources\SetupPrep.exe. Then it would launch legacy setup.
In the scenario 2, Windows setup would be redirected to the ConX setup to perform upgrade installation automatically.
So, what is the difference of the scenario 1 and 2 to bring the different results of upgrade installation?
Workaround
Based on lots of testing, we find that if there is no space in the extracting location of the ISO installation
file, the upgrade installation would work fine.
What’s more, we can get the meaning of the two setup models in the setupact.log:
Legacy setup: it is same with setup from DVD boot.
ConX setup: it would check the compatibility and language UI for upgrade preparation, then perform migration and upgrade directly.
Additional Resource
From the release of Windows 10 Technical Preview, many users have installed and tested Windows 10 Technical Preview, we still hope more and more users would download and install Windows 10 Technical Preview for test, and provide
us your feedback.
Download Windows Technical Preview
http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/preview-iso
Download Windows Technical Preview for Enterprise
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/evalcenter/evaluate-windows-technical-preview-for-enterprise
Please click to vote if the post helps you. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.

Hello,
I would guess that existence of a space in the folder name is what the issue is. Try removing the space from the folder name and see if works. New_Folder for example
Thanks, Darrell Gorter [MSFT] This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

Oracle DB 10g to 11g Upgrade

Hi,
We have a SAP Oracle Database, the size is 1.5 TB.
The Hardware details are
Application – SAP ERP 6.0 EHP5 SPS6
Database – Oracle 10.2.0.2
OS Platform – AIX 5.3 TL05, SP06
HW – 8 Dual Core CPU’s, 256 GB RAM on DB-CI server
Test Environment : 32 GB RAM
Please from your experience let me know how much time will a 10g to 11g upgrade will take.
Regards,
Narayan

hi,
There are several parameters you have to check before upgrading. Commonly it is independent of size of database.I think it will take as minimum 1 hour. Check the links to speed up upgrading and to consider pre-upgrade preparation:
https://blogs.oracle.com/UPGRADE/entry/how_long_will_your_upgrade_tak
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/database/upgrade/best-practices-for-upgrading-11gr2-174946.pdf

Some doubts in upgradation

hi
i studied some upgradation documents i have some doubts. please dont give any help files or again links for upgradation
bec i need some scenerio why they need to follow this steps
Check compounding consistency in MultiProviders
Info Cubes Fact views
BEX History
STD SAP Report
0adhoc Templates Activation

Hi suneel,
check this links......
Link: How to SAP BW 3.5 Upgrade Preparation and Post Upgrade CheckList (NW2004)
Even this might be of use:
BI 7.0 Initial Hurdles
May be useful for you,
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/e0c9c8be-346f-2a10-2081-cd99177c1fb9
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/10564d5c-cf00-2a10-7b87-c94e38267742
/message/5971540#5971540 [original link is broken]
You may wish to check my thread below -
https://forums.sdn.sap.com/click.jspa?searchID=13971844&messageID=3308304 Broad caster
Upgrade preparation
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/472443f2-0c01-0010-20ab-fbd380d45881
/message/3221895#3221895 [original link is broken]

Upgrade to BI 7.0 with non-ALPHA converted values in 0MATERIAL

We are upgrading from BW 3.1C to NW2004s / BI 7.0.
While performing our pre-upgrade checks using RSRV, we found 93,000 of 1.7 million material records which have not been ALPHA converted. This may be a legacy from an earlier 2.0 to 3.1C upgrade where the ALPHA conversion was skipped because the ALPHA conversion would a take "too long"
Our client currently has 500InfoProviders and 500 Aggregates in a 20 terabyte database.
All of SAP's documention for BW upgrades insists upon ALPHA conversion prior to upgrade.
1. Has anyone experience upgrading without ALPHA conversion? I would like to have a chat with you.
2. Does anyone have an easy techinque for detminining if these values are used in InfoProviders? These values are invisible through "Maintain Master Data" This would helps us determine if ignoring or deleting the values is a viable option.
Thank you for your help,
John Hawk

Hi,
As per the standared upgarde guide ALPHA convertion check is not necessary for Upgrade from BW 3.1 to BI7.0.
Note 447341 specifies as shown bellow:
Upgrade from BW >= 3.0B to BW >= 3.1 Content.
In this case, the consistency of the data should be already be ensured by a previous upgrade. As a precaution, a check is carried out in the upgrade PREPARE.
Do not, therefore, implement the solution described under Section 2.1 in this case. In particular, it is not necessary to export a transport created from the BOM RSMD_ALPHA and would in any case result in errors (unknown syntax "R3TR" "TABL" "RSMDCONTCONVEXIT" or "Object R3TR TABL RSMDCONTCONVEXIT requires a catalog entry") because some of the objects no longer exist.
Check weather the error messages that you get is of type(R3TR" "TABL" "RSMDCONTCONVEXIT" or "Object R3TR TABL RSMDCONTCONVEXIT ). then you can ignore thouse error messages.
Refer to 447341.
Regards,
Srinivas.

Urgent SAP upgrade from 4.0B to 4.7 Oracle 9.2.0.6

Dear support,
I have upgraded my oracle database to 8.1.7.4 with 4.0B extended kernel along with upgradation from NT 4.0 to Win 2000 is finished , and we are planning to upgrade SAP to 4.7 version.Please let me know whether i need to upgrade my database to oracle 9.2.0.6 before upgrade prepare phase ,
If yes then , do 4.0B ext kernel on Win 2000 will support oracle 9.2.0.6
I am not able to find any info on service.sap.com\PAM , because info about 4.0B
version not available.
Best Regards,
AjitR.

-> regarding 40B_EXT see sapnote 1.009.695
-> see sapnote 85.838 (section Operating System: WINDOWS FOR X86):
SAP KERNEL 4.0B_COM 32-BIT:
ORACLE 8.1.7 WINDOWS SERVER 2000/IA32 32BIT 4,5
ORACLE 9.2 WINDOWS SERVER 2000/IA32 32BIT 6,7,8
ORACLE 9.2 WINDOWS SERVER 2003/IA32 32BIT 9
SAP KERNEL 4.0B_EXT 32-BIT:
ORACLE 9.2 WINDOWS SERVER 2000/IA32 32BIT 6,7,8
ORACLE 9.2 WINDOWS SERVER 2003/IA32 32BIT 9
GreetZ, AH

BW upgrade 3.0 to 3.5

HI all,
we are about to upgrade a BW project from 3.0 to 3.5. could any one explain me the upgrade procedue.
and pl mail me if u have any extact procedure documents and live issues.
Thanks in advance.
kiran
[email protected]

hi Kiran,
there is 'How to SAP BW 3.5 upgrade preparation and postupgrade checklist' doc
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/a245e690-0201-0010-4393-ef078d3ad0ed
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/library/biw/g-i/how to bw 3.x upgrade checklist
hope this helps.

BI 7.0 upgrade prepare

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for