BI enterprise edition installation;all on just one server

Hi everybody,
I am going to install Oracle business intelligence 11 on linux x86-64 platform.As it needs a database to be installed I have to install Oracle 11gR2 on the same server.
I was reading Oracle BI documentation that I came across this sentence:
The database must be up and running, and does not have to be on the same computer where you are installing the components
I know base on distribution it is better to separate BI repository(Oracle database) and its application.
What if I want to use same server for both?Any special error or prevention by Installer?
All the best,

Hi Arash,
The recommendation to have different hosts for each component of your BI environment is mostly to optimize performance in production systems, for development and demo environments you can have the whole stack installed in a single system.
RCU is a separate download, you can find it at the bottom of this page:
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/middleware/bi-enterprise-edition/downloads/bus-intelligence-11g-165436.html

Similar Messages

Where to download 10gR2 DB enterprise edition, or can we just duplicat?

Where to download 10gR2 DB enterprise edition, or can we just duplicate?
Our prod db is 10gR2 and we have some issue with disks on the server. We want to create a new server with same version database installed. I cannot find 10gR2 version any where in oracle web. Where we can find it? Or can we just simple copy the existing oracle home from the current prod DB server to create new oracle home? If so, any procedure?
Thanks!

liaison1 wrote:
Where to download 10gR2 DB enterprise edition, or can we just duplicate?
Our prod db is 10gR2 and we have some issue with disks on the server. We want to create a new server with same version database installed. I cannot find 10gR2 version any where in oracle web. Where we can find it? Or can we just simple copy the existing oracle home from the current prod DB server to create new oracle home? If so, any procedure?
Thanks!V10 Oracle is no longer supported & available.
If you have a support contract, then submit a Service Request to obtain the desired version.

Java Enterprise Edition Installation Issues

Hello
I am trying to install version 8 of the Java Enterprise Edition software but I am experiencing 2 errors. Sometimes I get a message that it cannot find the jre and now the jvm. I have JRE_HOME and JAVA_HOME defined. When this happens after the path page is done, I get a dialog error message with just an x in it. The other error happened once after defining the variables with an out of memory error. I have 2 gigabytes of memory,
I need some help.

Enterprise Edition -- that's the one you pay a lot of
$$ for, right? I would think those $$ entitle you to
telephone support, or am I wrong?They have an enterprise trial that allows you a free 30 days (full functionality).
I personally have not had any problems with it. (WinXP, RedHat 9.0)
Smooth like butter.

Oracle 8i Enterprise Edition installation

As an OTN member. I had asked for free JDeveloper CD. Oracle corporation has
sent me JDeveloper and Oracle 8i Enterprise Edition release 2 version 8.1.6
for Windows NT/2000.
I am a programmer. I want to use oracle 8i to learn oracle RDBMS.
When I try to install Oracle 8i it says installing oracle client. It gives me
options of administrator, programmer, user and custom. It installs oracle
client successfully. But oracle server is missing. So I can not connect to
server and do any database function. Please help me on this.
Let me know if on a standalone PC with Windows 98 installing Oracle 8i client
is enough. If not How do I get another software. If I am making any mistake please let me know.
I think I should have either Oracle personal edition or Oracle server edition
null

Hi Aditya
Thank you for your time.
CD # is C13341-02
If I install Windows 2000 on my PC would this CD install database.
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Adithya, Oracle Support Analyst:
Hi,
You cannot install oralce 8i Enterprise edition on windows 98.
You should be able to install it on windows
NT workstation.
If you are unable to install oracle 8i database, please let me know the CD part number.
regards,
Adithya
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
null

SQL Server Enterprise Edition installation and V3

Hi Team,
Our trial evaluation version of the SQL Server has expired. We already have a SQL Server Enterprise edition DVD which was shipped along with the SAP ECC 6.0 (2004S) software (which we purchased from SAP).
1. Can we install this DVD on the Discovery system?
2. If yes, what are the steps please?
3. If no then, what are the steps to install the demo license again?
4. What do we have to do to upgrade to Version 3 of Discovery system? Is there any cost involved?
Please respond. Your help and guidance would be of tremendous value to us. Points would be awarded for helpful answers.
Thanks much for your time.

Hi Suresh,
Microsoft SQL server is an evaluation version for 180 days.
you need to have a regular database license ready after that timeframe.
That licence you get from microsoft.
Try these steps for reinstalling DB server.
Detach the databases,
Uninstall the SQL eval version,
Reinstall a fully licensed Enterprise addition of SQL and then
Re-attach the db's (using the script attach_dbs.bat, step 5,in
the Quick Guide).
This should be all that is needed.
Please make sure you back-up the system before going through all
the steps.
You are free to upgrade your v2.0 system by downloading patches
and service packs from SAP's Service MarketPlace and applying
them to the system. As the DS is an appliance - bundled hardware
and software , there is no automatic upgrade from v2.0 to v3.0.But
we cant assure you about the compatiability of new scenarios
developed for V3.0 for this upgrade version of V2.0.
I suggest you easiest way of using a full configured V3 is
buying new Hardware.Then you will have new scenarios.
yes, you are right DS V3.0 is packed with MAX DB5.5.
Hope this information will help you,
Best Regards,
Sanam

Sticky serverfarm, all connections on one server

We are using a sticky serverfarm with 2 real servers, one server was down for maintenance for an extended period of time. When it came inservice again it was not getting any connections. is it because all the connections had stuck to the other server ? we want sessions to be sticky but we also want to LB so what is the answer to this?
I got it working by bouncing the server that had been online all the time. things started to LB then.
BTW the ACE 4710 is running 4.2.1

That is expected behaviour wih sticky.
regards
Andrew

Installer - all day I get Server not responding Error code 207

Trying to install CC Desktop - all day I get Server not responding Error code 207. Is this an internet performance issue or a real issue with the server?

Hi,
Thanks for the suggestion Romit. I believe the reported error code was installer app code rather than Windows error code.
I have now had my broadband installed so have retried this install again, rather than on original public wifi. I'm pleased to say that it has all installed very well. I'm therefore pretty sure that it was an internet performance issue.
Hope this helps anyone in the future.

Enterprise Edition on 2 dual core CPU server?

Will the enterprise edition of ColdFusion that is licensed
for 2 CPUs work on a server with 2 dual core CPUs (Dell PowerEdge
2950), and use them to full benefit?
Thanks. -bg

Bill Gordon wrote:
> Will the enterprise edition of ColdFusion that is
licensed for 2 CPUs work on a server with 2 dual core CPUs (Dell
PowerEdge 2950)
Yes.
> and use them to full benefit?
CF will, but ultimately that depends on your code.
Jochem
Jochem van Dieten
Adobe Community Expert for ColdFusion

Windows 10 Enterprise Edition: Installation and Development Environment Essentials: Thoughts & Assistance Req:

Hello,
I am in the architecture planning stage of my project and seeking personal and general good advice from Mircosoft engineers. I am laying the foundation stones of a new development product using at least three more new technologies that are
as new as Windows 10. Their are also around four or five technology partners with the latest version of their software that I wish to take onboard. Due to the sensitive nature of the project it is not wise for me to state each piece of technology used,
so I will be as accurate as possible using the limited means I have.
I wish to make a "closed" development environment, with the latest build (currently 9860), install the new software. Some of which installs fine, some of which is not compatabile with Windows 10. Regarding the latter I am in discussions with the
technology providers to make a work-around and hammer and chisel through every issue. Very soon I hope to have a fully stable working development environment which paves the road to a first prototype. So i need to make a decision soon to "lock
down" everything. I will miss Windows 10 updates but the advantage is when the project vertical slice is complete, the feedback and benefit will be larger for Windows 10 final product.
This is probably my fifth or sixth early evaluation of the Windows platform and I am aware of the highs and lows of working with various versions using new builds, from the stability of win98 (becoming 2000 - minus millennium 1999 edition), to the quick uninstall
of vista (it broke our internal projects). The solid bedrock of Windows NT (becoming XP) and so on. The good news is Windows 10 seems very good indeed.
My questions are two:
1) Would the windows team recommend a closed environment development in my situation, and are they aware of other developers doing it (is it wise from your end)? Is their a pool, can we communicate directly?
or
2) Would you recommend an open environment instead? Every install is updated, everything is all on-line and networked, this may lead to more breakages and sacrifice the finished product.
The problem with approach number 2 is that a particular technology may work with this build, but not the next one and vice versa. I will constantly be playing "bunny hop" trying to make it work.
The problem with using number 1 is that you can have a "false dawn" view of the project, meaning you have managed to get it stable and develop code that fits that environment and build, but as soon as you do update six months later, it breaks due
to feature change, it means massive re-work, ultimately breaking the product again.
I have seen these approaches drown larger projects and wash away whole development teams.
Its a tough one and a part of my R&D but very soon I need to make a decision.
To explain more, some of the technology used will be:
Windows 10 Enterprise - Perforce - Office 365 with Exchange Activ Synch - Any associated Intel CPU and GPU monitors.
In other words very stable and solid technology. Their is about an equal number of other techs that are not so stable but I am slowly getting to work under Windows 10.All feedback would be given to Microsoft, regardless of environment 1 or 2.
Any advice and help from the Microsoft Team is greatly appreciated.
Yours Kindly,
Asad

I recently went to an Enterprise Mobility Summit Microsoft was holding at one of their facilities, and they spoke a bit about the future of Windows 10 - and here's what I left with: Microsoft isn't really sure themselves what kind of updating scheme they're
going to be doing with Windows 10. They had some ideas, but they're looking for feedback from enterprises and engineers about their plan.
I don't think it was under an NDA, so I should have no problem discussing it: their idea was to have different tracks (based on the user) with different upgrade schedules based on what the administrator deems appropriate for that user. For instance,
a consumer would have their OS automatically updated as soon as the update was available. while enterprises could stagger their users to a more manageable 3-month or 6-month schedule. Microsoft wasn't sure how long to make this stagger schedule - talk
of a 1 year stagger were floated, but nothing concrete. Critical devices, like POS or ATMs, could be setup so they would never be upgraded, or only upgraded when the administrator specifically allows them to be upgraded.
For you personally, it sounds like a closed development environment is better, since you're testing critical business applications. Again, one never knows exactly what direction Microsoft will take, but with the amount of conversations and...
warnings that dropped by various people at this meeting, it's pretty safe to say that they'll be some sort of timed release schedule for enterprises that you can prepare for.
Hope that helps!

I have a new imac (10.7.3) and when I download CDs, if there are 21 tracks, I get 21 albums all with just one track. HELP!

I have a new imac computer(10.7.3) and now when I import from cds, if there are 21 tracks, I get 21 albums all with one track. Can anyone help please?
Jim

Steve MacGuire aka turingtest2 - iTunes & iPod Hints & Tips - Grouping Tracks Into Albums - http://www.samsoft.org.uk/iTunes/grouping.asp (older post on Apple Discussions http://discussions.apple.com/message/9910895)
Quick answer: Select all the tracks on the album, File > get info, and either give them all a single "album artist", or check the "compilation" flag (as in https://discussions.apple.com/message/17670085).
If these are from multiple-CD sets you may also need to enter the appropriate information in the disc number fields.

9926 Enterprise Edition Installation

Just upgraded my 9901 install to 9926 using the ISO. Total time was just
under 20 minutes and no problems with the install.
Paul Adare - FIM CM MVP
All that glitters has a high refractive index.

Hi Derek,
Thank you for your feedback.
I tested at my side and see the same result:
The version is 10.0.9926, for teh description and the Name part, we may take use of Windows Feedback tool to submit this.
Best regards
Michael Shao
TechNet Community Support

2 installations of WLS on one server

Hi,
I'm working on a project where we're using WLS and Forms / Reports.
The version is 10.3.6.0.
We have a development environment and need some kind of test environment. For reasons I can't comment on here we'll have to use the same server to run WLS as both test and development.
My question is - is it possible at all? I know i have to take into consideration port clashes and so on.
If it's possible would it be most intelligent to make two completly separate installations. I.e. install WLS twice and F/R on top of this in both instances?
Or is it better to to install WLS one and F/R twice on top of this.
Does anybody have any experience running a setup like this?
it was possible with the old iAS without much hassle.
Any pointers to doc on how to do this?
br
Kim

You can use the following steps:
- Install WebLogic
- Install Form and Reports (do not configure)
- Run the configuration to create your first domain. To my knowlegde after the configuration
is finished the node manager (and all the servers will be running). This means that
when you create the second domain (by running the configuration script again) it will
fail when the node manager is set-up.
Also check if both domain configuration are present in the nodemanager.domains file.
This file is by default placed in the ${WL_HOME}/common/nodemanager directory.
In the nodemanager.properties (located in the same directory) there is the following line:
DomainsFile=/some/directory/nodemanager.domainsalso the nodemanager.properties contains the location of the log file:
LogFile=/some/directory/domain-name/nodemanager.logSo when you have two domains that is managed by one node manager the logs
are put in (probably) the last directory domain directory the configuration
wizard creates.

CSS11501 direct all requests to one server?

Hi,
We have a CSS 11501 with 2 webservers behind it. The people from serveradmin want one webserver to be used for all requests, and only use the second one when the first one gets too busy (let's say > 80 %)
So in a very busy scenario, both webservers would be used
I've looked into Primary sorry server but believe that's only to be used when the first webserver dies, so this does not apply.
I also thought about using different weights for the services, but even when you give webserver 1 a weight of 10, and webserver 2 a weight of 1, there will still be requests forwarded - albeit very few - to webserver 2, right?
Anyone encountered this before? Any help greatly appreciated.
Regards,
Radboud

firs you have to define what is 80%
The CSS has now knowledge of the capacity of the servers.
I see 2 options to define 80%.
First you know that your box can handle 100 connections.
So you can define 80% to be 80 connections.
You could then configure maxconn to 80.
The primarysorryserver will kick in once maxconns has been reached for all other servers.
Another solution is a script on the server itself that measure the load and update a file with a value ON or OFF.
When reaching 80% of maxload, simple rewrite the file with the vaule off.
On the CSS create a keepalive to read this file and disable the service if the value is off.
When disabled, the primarysorryserver will kick in.
Regards,
Gilles.

Oracle standard edition one and enterprise edition difference

Can the stadard edition one support user roles and access priveleges for them, for example can I create a user called u1, create an access privelege read_only and assign u1 to read_only.
Also, can I do database audits on the standard edition one database.
Can also be reached at [email protected]
Appreciate your response.
Thanks

Hello,
Here is the basic difference between Standard Edition One and Enterprise Edition
Oracle Database Standard Edition One :
Oracle Database Standard Edition One delivers unprecedented ease of
use, power, and performance for workgroup, department-level, and Web
applications. Standard Edition One can only be licensed on servers with
a maximum capacity of two processors.
Oracle Database Enterprise Edition :
Oracle Database Enterprise Edition provides the performance,
availability, scalability, and security required for mission-critical
applications such as high-volume online transaction processing (OLTP)
applications, query-intensive data warehouses, and demanding Internet
applications. Oracle Database Enterprise Edition contains all of the
components of Oracle Database, and can be further enhanced with the
purchase of the options and packs.
https://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/f?p=130:14:3297805768795637384::::p14_database_id,p14_docid,p14_show_header,p14_show_help,p14_black_frame,p14_font:NOT,271886.1,1,1,1,helvetica
Check the url you will find more info.
-Sri

Oracle standard edition vs. enterprise edition

Hi all
Due to cost constraints, we have had to downgrade our 8i Database Enterprise Edition installation to Standard Edition.
My question is: do we have to re-create our database under Standard Edition, to make it a 'Standard Edition' database, or can we just re-open our existing database (created under Enterprise Edition) with the Standard Edition?
I installed 8i SE and opened our database but, of course, SELECT BANNER FROM V$VERSION suggests we're still running the EE.
Are we breaking the terms of our licence by using this existing database?
Very many thanks
Andrew

Hi!
My impression is during the database creation time, Oracle incorporates in data dictionary the options available for each product edition in that time.
Try to execute a specific operation that needs an E.E. license just like parallel query, advanced replication, and Partitioning.
Execute this query:
select * from v$option;
And compare to the Database Feature and Option Availability ( notes available on metalink ):
Differences Between Standard Edition and Enterprise Edition in 8i
Note:112591.1
Differences between Oracle 8.1.x Personal, Standard and Enterprise on NT/2000
Note:70059.1
As long as this is only my impression, try opening a SR to make it sure.
HTH
Best regards.
RK

BI enterprise edition installation;all on just one server

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for