BI switching to new ECC 6.0 box from R/3 4.7 box, question on delta init?

Hi all,
Our BI has been already upgraded to 7.0. Currently connected to R/3 4.7.
Now a new box is made with ECC 6.0 and Oracle 8 which is a mirror copy of the r/3 4.7.Once the new box is ready the BI 7.0 connection will be switched from R/3 4.7 to the new box ECC 6.0.
My question is ...
In the R/3 4.7 the datasources were already initialized for delta..so the pointer for delta was already setup.
Now when we connect the new ECC box do I have to initialize delta again ? or would the new system recognize the pointer since it is a mirror copy from the old system?
pls advice

It´s a bit confusing what you write - I try to get your point:
- your 4.7 is running on Oracle 8 (VERY old, unsupported)
- you install a NEW system on ERP 6.0? Or do you upgrade your 4.7 copy?
Markus

Similar Messages

BI switching to new ECC 6.0 box from R/3 4.7, question on delta init?

Hi all,
Our BI has been already upgraded to 7.0. Currently connected to R/3 4.7.
Now a new box is made with ECC 6.0 and Oracle 8 which is a mirror copy of the r/3 4.7.Once the new box is ready the BI 7.0 connection will be switched from R/3 4.7 to the new box ECC 6.0.
My question is ...
In the R/3 4.7 the datasources were already initialized for delta..so the pointer for delta was already setup.
Now when we connect the new ECC box do I have to initialize delta again ? or would the new system recognize the pointer since it is a mirror copy from the old system?
pls advice

Hi,
you would have added the new ECC source system to the BI.
I that case I think you need to initialize the Data again.
As all other requirements for delta like the pointer in delta queue might not be set for the new datasources.
I havent tried such thing till. but as per the concepts I understand You need to initialize the data
Regards
Praeon

Steps/RisksConnecting BW with New ECC 6 while keeping old ECC5 box active

Hi Friends-
Right now we have current dataflow from ECC 5 to BW 7.0 for differnet countries .Now i have a situation where i have new ecc 6.0 box. and I need to move only one country functionality to new Ecc6 box and load data from new box to current BW box. So what are the pain ponts/Risks in doing this. My concern is all about master data, Can anyone suggest the best methodology to do this without effecting current dataflow or overwriting objects.
Regards,
Mark

Hello Mark,
Does your master data overlap and you can't easily make it unique from the individual source systems? If not you could compound with 0SOURCSYSTEM as described in the SAP note 184948.
Best Regards,
Des

Checklist for BI on new ECC box

Hello Experts, Can you please provide me the BI checklist for the new ECC box. We just built a new box and we want to confirm that all the BI componets and contents are installed.
Thx.

jackalcarlos76 wrote:
That's all well and good, though I've never agreed or been asked to agree to be part of a trial, nor am I paying trial prices for my subscription.
You are not part of any trial. You have the latest working software on your box. That is now standard issue to new customers.
Life | 1967 Plus Radio | 1000 Classical Hits | Kafka's World
Someone Solved Your Question?
Please let other members know by clicking on ’Mark as Accepted Solution’
Helpful Post?
If a post has been helpful, say thanks by clicking the ratings star.

IM Init with new ECC and BI Production start up

Hi Everyone:
We have a new BI and new ECC going live. There will be a period of downtime in the production ECC box after conversions are done. This will be just prior to golive time. Is it ok to go ahead and do the 3 inits for IM with ECC to BI before the boxes are up and being used? We have done this before on another project without any problems but I just need some confirmation for my peace of mind on this. Thx

Hi,
In r/3 side ok when ever u rcoping from one systme to another for example if u take r/3 production to r/3 quality now the entire system will be copied as like production in r/3
now in bw quality is asconnected to r/3 quality once ur copied the logical system every thing cahnegd in quality r/3 but before copy the system is connected with different logical system.
hence it is better to chnage logical system after copying from production to quality.
now u take BW side,yes what u said is write it is tottlly coping system if u r refereshed the system automatically the production system will be copied in quality all delta process will come to quality
so once u r refreshed teh quality r/3 then it si better to once again replicate the qualty sasyte(after coping productionr/3) the do the copy of bw production to quality.
Thanks & Regards
Sathsih

Concerns over switching between new Azure SQL Database Service Tiers

Windows Azure's new SQL Database
service tier pricing model will be put into effect in less than 12 months. We currently have SQL Databases on the Business and Web Edition pricing models.
We recently asked Azure Support a number of questions around the scalability and ability to switch between these tiers. The responses so far have been far from encouraging:
Q: If we exceed the criteria for a given tier (see http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/azure/dn741336.aspx), how will Azure respond? For example, if we are on the S1 service tier, and we exceed the maximum number of sessions (200), will any new sessions be
blocked until we manually increase the service tier? Or will you automatically move (and bill) us to/for the next tier level?
A: If you exceed the criteria of the existing tier, you shall be notified of performance issue like throttling. Users may experience slowness and blocking. There will not be any automatic upgrade.
Q: So to confirm, if we suddenly experience increased, unanticipated client activity overnight due to our web site becoming more popular, you will be blocking any user sessions over and above our performance level limit, until we manually make the transition
to the next level? Is there no “overdraft” facility/scalability in this respect? If this scenario took place within a short space of time, how would we have time to react? Simply blocking new sessions and preventing customers from using our site is not acceptable.
A: I’m sure you understand that SQL Azure database is a shared resource and hence we cap the resources for individual subscription so that a fair service is provided to all the concurrent users. If you feel that you cannot compromise on the user experience
then you shall think of an edition that best suits you. Please refer to the following document to best understand the throttling and its impact. http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/1541.windows-azure-sql-database-connection-management.aspx#Throttling_Limits
Q: Since the changing of the performance level could take several minutes/hours depending on the size of the database, would we experience any downtime/degradation of performance of the database during this period?
A: You might
Q: If downtime/degradation of performance are a possibility whilst we switch service tiers, what do Microsoft recommend we do to safeguard against this? Should we create a second database on a higher tier level and then export the data from the lower tier and
import to the higher, before switching over? How do Microsoft recommend we switch tiers in a production environment with minimal disruption?
A: If you want to upgrade the tiers due to degradation of performance, you will have to create another database on a higher tier and import the data.
One of our key reasons for moving to Azure hosting was the seamless scalability it appeared to offered. As you can imagine, the responses above are a major concern for our production environment. Does anyone else have any thoughts or concerns in this respect?

James,
I reviewed the support incident you referred to and believe that the questions you asked may have been answered later in the interaction you had with the engineer. For the benefit of others viewing this forum I want to reiterate the answers
to your key questions here as well.
Q. What is the behavior when you reach the limits for the service tier?
A. Each service tier currently has limits on 4 different dimensions (CPU, physical reads, log writes and memory) of resource consumption. When you reach one of the limits, the behavior depends on which resource limit you are hitting, but
generally speaking is consistent with the behavior you would see with a similar hardware limit in the SQL Server box product. For example, when you reach the CPU limit your queries will start showing more SOS_SCHEDULER_YIELD waits,
the memory limit will cause a higher percentage of pages to be read from disk instead of the buffer cache (PAGEIOLATCH_xx waits), etc. This set of limits does not directly abort any of your queries--they just run longer as they
vie for the fixed set of resources made available to your database. In a system where the load greatly exceeds the resources, queries may start to time out.
The new service tiers continue with the Web/Business edition behavior of limiting the number of sessions and concurrent requests (worker threads) you can have. When you exceed these limits you'll get error 10928. Note that
each tier in Basic/Standard/Premium have different values for these limits (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/azure/dn369873.aspx) than Web/Business and thus may encounter the errors at different usage levels. The key is choosing the appropriate
service level for the application, and to facilitate that the sys.resource_stats view shows historical usage information so you know where you stand as far as reaching any of the limits. This resource consumption data is also available in the portal.
Q. Is it possible to switch service tiers, and is there any disruption when you do so?
A. Yes, you can change between service tiers as described in this MSDN documentation (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/azure/dn369872.aspx). This can be done through the portal, powershell, or REST APIs. [The preview currently has a restriction
where legacy servers don't support switching to Basic/Standard which is expected to be removed in the near future.] The link above outlines the limits on the number of tier changes you can do in a 24 hour period, expected time to perform the change, and
the client disconnect that occurs.
If you have further questions, feel free to re-engage on the support incident or reply to this forum thread.

Cannot get my iphone5 to synch with my new computer. i am running itunes through a virtual box, Every time I try a box appeares telling me to enter security code- ? anyone know how to solve this ?

Cant get my iphone 5 to sync with my computer (new operating system). Am running XP through a virtual box. When I try to sync the phone it keeps asking for auto lock code, there is no box to type it into and I can find nothing on the phone itself to solve the problem.
This makes it impossibble to sync with my itunes account. Anyone out there able to help ?

Have you tried contactint the app's developer?

My default search engine is Google and I deleted Bing. Whenever I open a new tab, Bing is displayed and it takes the focus so if I am trying to type a URL in the new tab, it is entered in the damn bing search box. HOW DO I GET RID OF THAT ACCURSED BING?

My default search engine is Google and I deleted Bing from the Search Providers. Facebook is set as my home page. Whenever I open a new tab, a Bing search box is displayed on the page and it takes the focus so when I am trying to type a URL in the new tab, it is entered in the damn bing search box. HOW DO I GET RID OF THAT ACCURSED BING

Swarnava, thank you very much! that did it and I am Bing-less . . . OH HAPPY DAY!! WOOHOO!!!! thank you, thank you, thank you!

I'm embarrassed to ask this: when I click to initiate a new email message in the "From" box it automatically chooses the wrong email address (I have three but use one mainly). How can I get the right choice to appear automatically?

I'm embarassed to ask this: when I click on the new mail icon to write a new email message, in the box "FROM" appears the wrong email address: I have three but mainly use one. How can I correct this so that the right email address appears in the "FROM" box?

I assume this is Apple Mail. Try this:
Preferences > Accounts > your-first-account
Select Outgoing Mail Server of account/name you wish to use and check Use only this server
Repeat for other accounts.

How can I turn off Recently Websites when opening new Safari window? After tapping on the two overlapping boxes on the bottom right of Safari, a new blank window appears with Favorites, but now in iOS 8, recently viewed websites are listed.

How can I turn off Recently Visited Websites when opening new Safari window?
After tapping on the two overlapping boxes on the bottom right of Safari, a new blank window appears with Favorites, but now in iOS 8, recently viewed websites are listed. How can I turn this function off? I do NOT want my new Safari windows to have history displayed of previous websites I visited. I only want my Favorites (on the top) to be displayed. Please help.
Thank you for your time, patience, understanding, kindness, and concern.

Thanks for replying, but that isn't the answer I am looking for. Also, there is no + sign, UNLESS you do tap the overlapping boxes.
Let me try to ask my question a little more clearly:
When I tap the two overlapping boxes on the lower left (the option to Open New Windows), the new Window that appears will show your Bookmarked FAVORITES. But with my new iPhone 6, and the new iOS 8.0.2, when I tap the two boxes to open a New Window, my Bookmark Favorites show (as they always have and should), but below them, there is a dividing line underneath them, and it says Recently Viewed Websites, and has these websites available to tap.
So my question is, HOW DO I TURN THESE OPTION OFF?
*UPDATE (10.13.14): Since I have asked this question, I no longer see these Recently Viewed Websites under my Bookmarked Favorites in my new Window tabs. So I hope that Apple fixed it, or somehow it was a mistake, or somehow I changed an Option on my iPhone 6 that stopped this for reoccurring.
Thank you for your help bobseufert! I appreciate your concern, kindness, and the time to try to help. I am grateful.
Have a blessed day.

Warning while adding new ECC

Hi ,
I am getting error while adding new ECC variable in ICM. PFB the error message.
" The Maximum size of all Expanded Call Variable in the Computer Telephony Integeration Server is 2500 bytes. Saving these schanges would require 2795 bytes.
will this hamper the performance of the system..?

Hi, no, it will not work at all, so no worries about system performance.
Why are you adding a new ECC variable when the system tells you it wont fit?
G.
Sent from Cisco Technical Support Android App

Do I need an ethernet switch or new router for IP camera setup with old Airport Express

Hello,
I am trying to setup a third party Foscam IP camera to my network so that I can ultimately use it as a baby monitor, and am having some difficulty. I currently still have an old Airport Express (with one ethernet port only). This is preventing me from setting up the initial camera because I don't have another ethernet port to plug it in to on the router. I am wondering if I can just buy an ethernet switch and have it "split" the ethernet from my modem to both the camera and the Airport (I do need to check with my ISP provider if they give me two separate IP address... but if they do, would this work?).
I am fairly sure however, that my ISP provider (comcast) only provides one IP for my account. Does this mean I would have to buy a new router altogether with more than one ethernet port on it or one with a WAN port? Would I, in this case, have to plug the modem into the WAN port on the router, and then the camera to one of the ethernet ports on the router?
I consider myself fairly tech savy, but when it comes to routers, IPs, LAN, WAN, etc. I get a bit lost. This has been creating quite a headache for me and any help would be appreciated! Thanks in advance!

I am wondering if I can just buy an ethernet switch and have it "split" the ethernet from my modem to both the camera and the Airport (I do need to check with my ISP provider if they give me two separate IP address... but if they do, would this work?).
Sorry, but this won't work as the modem expects only a single device ... either a computer or a router to be connected to it. Unless your modem is actually a combination modem & router or gateway device, then you would need a different router to solve your networking problem.

How do I stop firefox from switching to new tab when opening bookmarks in new tab

When I open a link in a new tab it does not switch to it automatically. I had to reinstall firefox to stop it from switching to new tabs automatically since the option being unticked didn't stop it from happening anyway. Now only when I open a bookmard in a new tab it still switches to the new tab and I do not want it to. Why is it doing this with the option unchecked and a fresh install with no add ons of any sort? And how do I make it stop?

Try to set the Boolean pref browser.tabs.loadBookmarksInBackground to true on the about:config page.
*http://kb.mozillazine.org/about:config

How do i stop it automatically switching to new tab, the setting is not ticked in options. This is annoying when opening several tabs.

Although I do not have 'switch to new tab immmediately' ticked, when I ask to open in new tab it switches immediately. This is a problem as I open several tabs from my main page and don't want to go to them at once, I'll look at them in order as I need them. Since an update I now have it switching to the opened tab, and I have to keep flicking back to the main tab. It's giving me repetitive strain problems having to keep clicking the mouse more than necessary. It's an option in the settings, I'd like it to rmain that way. I seriously don't want to keep having to go back to my main page every time I want to open a new tab. Could you make it as it was before please, it was super then. Many thanks in advance. :-)

Start Firefox in [[Safe Mode]] to check if one of the add-ons is causing the problem (switch to the DEFAULT theme: Tools > Add-ons > Themes).
* Don't make any changes on the Safe mode start window.
See:
* [[Troubleshooting extensions and themes]]

Data Migration from R3 to new ECC System

Hello,
We are doing a fresh implementation for SAP MDM. Currently we have 3 SAP R/3 systems and 1 non-R3 system (BPCS system). One of the project goals is to do data migration from all these 4 systems into a new SAP ECC system and to MDM for Vendor Master, Customer Master and Material Master. My manager says that we need Business Objects tool to Migrate these data. But, my question is that is it not possible to achive this through XI/PI itself ? Can anyone let me know the entire process in XI/PI as to how do I receive the Idocs from R/3, convert into XML and then send it to the new ECC system in Idoc format ?
Thks & Rgds,
Hema

Hi Gandhi,
You have SAP MDM, BPC and R/3 systems in your landscape, when you are migrating data to new ECC system, what is the role of mdm, did you moving the same data to MDM to avoid duplicate/redundant data??is there any data migration from R/3 to MDM(any integration required)or MDM to R/3,
You have to develop different interfaces to transfer data from MDM to ECC, BPC to ECC.definelty you required one middleware, the option definitely SAP PI. it offers very easy of integration between MDM and R/3 system, you can use MDM-PI adapter to connect to directly MDM syndicator file port from there you can pull the XML file and convert it in to IDoc format use Receiver IDoc adapter in PI, the same way we can integrate BPC system with R/3.
Search in sdn, there are some scenarios integration of R/3 and MDM using PI, refer those links, if still you have any doubts let me know,
Regards,
Raj

BI switching to new ECC 6.0 box from R/3 4.7 box, question on delta init?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for