Bid Evaluation Problem

Hi Guys,
During bid evaluation I need small modification.
I have given 15 attribute during bid creation and then I have assigned serial number to those attributes (1 , 2 , 3 ..... 15)
Vendor can see those attributes in sequential order that I have specified during bid creation.
I had downloaded the bid evaluation report from Analysis tab of bid invitation.
But problem is that while evaluation of bid I am not able to see those attributes in that sequence. It is selected randomly. I need in same order.
Thanks and Regards,
Apparao A
Message was edited by:
Apparao A

Hi
Better to take screen shot printout by logging as Vendor user in the system
and make the changes later on accordingly.
Hope this will help.
Pls reward suitable points.
Regards
-Atul

Similar Messages

Bid Evaluation Time Out

Hi Experts,
We have installed the basic SRM system on Classic Mode. The Bidding Functionality is working fine with Bid Invitation getting published and Bid responce getting created and can be accepted properly.
Issue is only when we click on the "Bid Com[parison" button, or go Bid Evaluation under analyses tab the system gives time out dump after a long wait.
Rest all functions within Bidding Engine are absolutely smooth and timeout timing in ICM is also increased at a very high value.
Can anyone suggest the diagonosis for this issue.
Regards
Hussain

Hi Dinesh,
The Notes were heplful to give some insight. Though it has not solved the problem.
As per note Note 846797 we have maintained the parameter value at ztta/diag_area and
As per note Note 889279 the changes were already present as per the patch level.
The issue still remains the same. Can you or anyone please suggest anything else.
Regards
Hussain

Bid Evalution Report Error

Hi Guys,
We are facing problem with Bid Evaluation report. We have created one bid invitation with some dynamic attributes in one sequence. Bidders are able to submit their bids in the same sequence. We are able to receive the values in same order. But the problem lies in the Bid Comparative statement.
In bid Evaluation report, we are unable to see those attributes in the same sequence. System is selecting the attributes randomly while displaying the results which are creating confusion.
For Example, Suppose we have created 11 attributes in one sequence.
1. Name of Bidder.
2. Manufacturing year
3. Type test of disconnecting device
4. Place of carrying out type test
5. Date of Conducting type test
6. Type test for Temporary power frequency over voltage capacity (KV rms).
7. Place of carrying out type test
8. Date of Conducting type test
9. Type test for Applicable standard
10. Place of carrying out type test
11. Date of Conducting type test
Here Purchaser wants the information about 3 different type tests. Purchaser has created 11 attributes in above sequence. Bidders are able to see these attributes in the same sequence and they have submitted their bid in the same sequence.
Now in the bid evaluation report we are not able to see these attributes in the same sequences which are created. System is displaying in randomly selected sequence. The Report is displaying in the following order.
1. Manufacturing year
2. Date of Conducting type test
3. Date of Conducting type test
4. Date of Conducting type test
5. Name of Bidder.
6. Type test for Temporary power frequency over voltage capacity (KV rms).
7. Place of carrying out type test
8. Place of carrying out type test
9. Place of carrying out type test
10. Type test for Applicable standard
11. Type test of disconnecting device
The above report doesnt present the data in systematic way. We are unable to analyze the data in this report.
We require the report in the original sequence.
Problem 2: If i click download button during bid evaluation, I am unable to download that report in to excel sheet. Can you please suggest what are the minimun change i need to do to download that report.
Thanks in advance for your valuable suggestion.

Hi
Please ensure that you execute the transaction with a user having SAP_ALL and SAP_NEW Profiles. Incase it's working, there is some problem with the BASIS Z-roles maintained in the Transaction - PFCG in the system.
Also refer to the following OSS notes.
790860 - Frequently asked questions for Excel upload and download
884855 - Schedule lines in generic upload/download
859049 - SRM 5.0: Restrictions for uploading and downloading
837535 - SRM Up-/Download Increase Value Length
734946 - SRM: Restrictions for upload and download
734060 - SRM: Upload and download of documents using MS Excel
673479 - Excel download: Quantities not displayed correctly
943988 - The Bid Comparison BAdI
943849 - Bid Comparison: no price bid invitations and same value
906934 - Unsuitable code page for download
883997 - Bid comparison: Questions and answers
846797 - Bid comparison: no data displayed
796942 - Comparison of bids: Price not location-dependent
790829 - Comparison of bids: Unit displayed in incorrect language
Let me know incase you need any other details.
Regards
- Atul

Bid Evaluation ?

Hi,
I am configuring the strategic sourcing [SRM5.0]scenario and have a situation in the process.
I[buyer] am successfully creating Bid invitations and assigning the vendors. I was also able to login with the vendor details and create bid successfully and a notification is also received the by the buyer as "This is an automatically generated e-mail. Please do not reply. Dear purchaser, The submission deadline for bid invitation no. xxxxxxx has lapsed. Please check the bids and take the appropriate action. "
But I am not sure where to check these bids and take appropriate action?
Can someone guide me on this?

Hi Roopesh,
There are two ways to compare bids that have been submitted for a bid invitation.
1. Click on the Bid Comparison action icon on the main screen with the Search Results table
2. Access the invitation by clicking on its name and then navigate to Analyses tab in the header. Select the link Bid Evaluation.
On both of these ways you reach the Compare Bids screen that features the details of the bids submitted on the items in the invitation, as well as the bidders answers to attributes and the corresponding valuation (i don't know if you have implemented it...).
If you want to define which bids should be compared, click the Bid Selection button on top of the screen, flag the checkboxes for the bids you want to compare and click Copy.
Kind regards,
Yann
Message was edited by: Yann Bouillut

SRM Bid Evaluation

Bid Evaluation is not listing in consecutive line item order. It is starting in the middle and then ending at the beginning. An example would be a 20 item bid. The evaluation starts at line item 10, goes thru 20, and then goes from 2 thru 9, and finally line item 1. Is there a section within configuration that would put this into an order such as ascending order 1 - 20?
Thanks.
Dan Scott

Hi Julian,
Sourcing in SRM provides full functionality to bidding and with LAC to auctioning. This is part of SRM Server, in combination with LAC. You can create, issue and evaluate RFx within SRM as well actions using LAC.
SAP acquired Frictionless Sourcing 2005 and offers these functionalities as well via eSourcing. These functions are part of eSourcing and can be integrated processually into the Sourcing process. They are not part of SRM Server. Depending on feavors of the customer you can use the sourcing functions in SRM or integrate eSourcing based on Frictionless technology.
Cheers,
Claudia

Custom Report Item CustomData evaluation problem in a subreport loop

Came across a strange problem with the custom report item CustomData property evaluation when using a sub report loop.
I have a master report, which contains a sub report component within a List. The List is bound to a dataset from which a numeric value is passed on to a sub report's report parameter, and from there further down as an argument to a sub report dataset. The sub
report contains our custom image CRI, which is bound to the said dataset. This dataset outputs a base64 encoded image data value, which the CRI then renders.
Now the problem is that only the first sub report iteration gets evaluated correctly, rest of them seem to get their CRI CustomData from the first iteration. So essentially the loop just outputs the same first sub report over and over again.
However, if I make the List component do a page break after each sub report, then all the sub reports start getting rendered correctly.
Here's how the CustomData gets initialized in the CRI designer class:
this.CustomData = new CustomData();
this.CustomData.DataRowHierarchy = newDataHierarchy();
this.CustomData.DataRowHierarchy.DataMembers.Add(newDataMember());
this.CustomData.DataRowHierarchy.DataMembers[0].Group = newGroup();
this.CustomData.DataRowHierarchy.DataMembers[0].Group.Name = this.Name + "_SingleGrouping";
this.CustomData.DataRowHierarchy.DataMembers[0].Group.GroupExpressions.Add(new ReportExpression());
this.CustomData.DataColumnHierarchy = new DataHierarchy();
this.CustomData.DataColumnHierarchy.DataMembers.Add(new DataMember());
DataRow row = new DataRow();
DataValue value = new DataValue();
value.Name = "Base64";
value.Value = "";
DataCell cell = new DataCell();
cell.Add(value);
row.Add(cell);
this.CustomData.DataRows.Add(row);
The CRI also exposes the CustomData's DataSetName and a Base64 property.
Has anyone else seen something like this happen? Not sure if this could be an issue with our CustomData configuration/usage, the API documentation is pretty much non-existent as usual. Seems more like bug to
me.
Leo Wartinen, Predisys Inc.

Hi WarLe,
If I understand correctly, you are using a list control to contain the subreport in the master report. The dataset of the list contains the field which is passed as the parameter values of the subreport. When you render the report, only the first subreport
gets evaluated correctly, rest of them seem to get their CRI CustomData from the first iteration, right?
If in this scenario, it seems that you haven’t add a group in the list. We can try to add a group grouped on the field which is passed as the parameter values of the subreport to check the issue again. Besides, could you mind post the sample data for the
dataset of the list and tell us the settings for the list control? Then we can make further analysis.
If there are any misunderstanding, please elaborate the issue for further investigation.
Thanks,
Katherine Xiong
Katherine Xiong
TechNet Community Support

Very strange EL evaluation problem

Hi,
I have a very strange problem atm.
I'm trying the JNDI Resources example on tomcat.
My test.jsp page looks like this:
<%@ page contentType="text/html;charset=UTF-8" language="java" %>
<%@ taglib uri="http://java.sun.com/jsp/jstl/core" prefix="c" %>
<%@ taglib uri="http://java.sun.com/jsp/jstl/sql" prefix="sql" %>
<html>
<head>
<title>DB Test</title>
</head>
<body>
<h2>Results</h2>
<c:out value="${1+2+3}"/>
<sql:query var="rs" dataSource="jdbc/JavaTest">
select id, foo, bar from testdata
</sql:query>
<c:out value="${rs.rowCount}"/>
<c:forEach var="row" items="${rs.rows}">
Foo ${row.foo}
Bar ${row.bar}
</c:forEach>
 
</body>
</html>
The output of this page is this:
Results
${1+2+3} ${rs.rowCount} Foo ${row.foo}
Bar ${row.bar}
As you can see these expressions are just written out to the browser and they are not being evaluated.
The problem is not with tomcat itself because other jsp's without database access work perfectly.
My web.xml file looks as follows:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE web-app
PUBLIC "-//Sun Microsystems, Inc.//DTD Web Application 2.3//EN"
"http://java.sun.com/dtd/web-app_2_3.dtd">
<web-app>
<description>MySQL Test App</description>
<resource-ref>
<description>blah</description>
<res-ref-name>jdbc/JavaTest</res-ref-name>
<res-type>javax.sql.DataSource</res-type>
<res-auth>Container</res-auth>
</resource-ref>
</web-app>
my context.xml file looks as follows:
<Context path="/DBTest" docbase="DBTest.war" debug="5" reloadable="true" crossContext="true" useNaming="true">
<Logger className="org.apache.catalina.logger.FileLogger"
prefix="localhost_DBTest_log." suffix=".txt" timestamp="true"/>
<Resource name="jdbc/JavaTest"
auth="Container"
type="javax.sql.DataSource"/>
<ResourceParams name="jdbc/JavaTest">
<parameter>
<name>factory</name>
<value>org.apache.commons.dbcp.BasicDataSourceFactory</value>
</parameter>
<parameter>
<name>maxActive</name>
<value>100</value>
</parameter>
<parameter>
<name>maxIdle</name>
<value>30</value>
</parameter>
<parameter>
<name>maxWait</name>
<value>10000</value>
</parameter>
<parameter>
<name>username</name>
<value>THiNG</value>
</parameter>
<parameter>
<name>password</name>
<value>**********</value>
</parameter>
<parameter>
<name>driverClassName</name>
<value>com.mysql.jdbc.Driver</value>
</parameter>
<parameter>
<name>url</name>
<value>jdbc:mysql://localhost:3306/javatest?autoReconnect=true</value>
</parameter>
<parameter>
<name>removeAbandoned</name>
<value>true</value>
</parameter>
<parameter>
<name>logAbandoned</name>
<value>true</value>
</parameter>
<parameter>
<name>removeAbandonedTimeout</name>
<value>300</value>
</parameter>
</ResourceParams>
</Context>
I've included the jstl.jar and standard.jar from the jstl package in the WEB-INF/lib directory, also the mysql-connector-java.jar (JDBCDriver) is included in the web-inf/lib directory.
Here is the logfile, which might contain the answer to my problem: (I removed the ResourceRef specification because it's exactly the same as in the context.xml file)
2004-09-29 13:45:01 NamingContextListener[Catalina/localhost/DBTest]: Resource parameters for jdbc/JavaTest = ResourceParams[]
2004-09-29 13:45:01 NamingContextListener[Catalina/localhost/DBTest]: Adding resource ref jdbc/JavaTest
2004-09-29 13:45:01 NamingContextListener[Catalina/localhost/DBTest]: ResourceRef[............]
2004-09-29 13:45:01 NamingContextListener[Catalina/localhost/DBTest]: Resource parameters for UserTransaction = null
2004-09-29 13:45:10 NamingContextListener[Catalina/localhost/DBTest]: Resource parameters for jdbc/JavaTest = ResourceParams[......................]
2004-09-29 13:45:10 NamingContextListener[Catalina/localhost/DBTest]: Adding resource ref jdbc/JavaTest
2004-09-29 13:45:10 NamingContextListener[Catalina/localhost/DBTest]: ResourceRef[...........]: Resource parameters for UserTransaction = null
Can somebody help me with this. I've been looking for a sollution for hours.
I've been having problems setting up the jdbc-driver also, but I think this is solved now with these deployment descriptors. I don't have a single clue what is going on right now.
${} expression are simple NOT being evaluated.
I don't think it's a database problem because I can see the user connections in the mysql monitor.
Any ideas? All help is welcome and very much appreciated. :-)
THANKS !!!
PS: sorry for the extreme long post, I wanted to post all relevant information to track this strange behaviour down.

Seems to be a problem with your web.xml not pointing to version 2.4.
Just check this link too:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg07006.html
HTH

Bid Invitation Problem......

Hi friends,
We are facing such problems when Bidder / Purchaser changing his bid and clicking on Held push button . After that Bidder is not able to change his bid . Bidder is getting this message u2018Transaction not possible . Since Bid Number currently locked u2018 . This problem facing frequently not every time . After clicking on held button purchaser is not able to change his bid . In both the cases no workflow is generating . We can see this Blocking entries in Transaction SM12 . Every time Table CRMD_ORDERADM_H is blocking . After deletion of entries from SM12 no blocking was there.
Even this is happening when purchase changes his bid at the time of Creation of Bid . After click on Hold push button bidder is not able to change his Bid .
Regards
Abhijeet

Hi Abhijeet,
We have a similar locking issue in PO's, which is simply caused by the buyers being "too efficient" Basically, if a document is put on hold, make sure the user is refreshing the search for it rather than clicking from the window where they put it on hold if they wish to process it further.
Basically, once they have put it on hold, get them to navigate back to the main menu / bid list / search screen and re-select the bid.
I kow this sounds simplistic, but it gives the document time to process and transfer to all the releavant places. Locks are often caused because a system process is interrupted.
Kind Regards
Sam

Bid Comparision Problem

Hello Friends,
We are in to SRM_SERVER 500 SAPKIBKS09
Classic scenario
I received 2-resposes to Bid invitation when i try to compare those
only blank screen is appearing no comparision or evaluation,no error
Does anybody know , what would be the reason and how to resolve the same
Thanks in advance
Best Regards
Diwakar

Hi,
See the foll notes:
846797
906934
BR,
Disha.
Pls reward points for useful answers.

Vision 8.2.1 evaluation Problem

Hi All
I had installed the Vision 8.2.0 Development Module evaluation mode and license day is expired before. Now, as i know that Vision Development Module upgraded to 8.2.1 & 8.5 version so i want to try its new features for those 8.2.1 or 8.5 evaluation version first and then to suggest my boss to buy the license. However, when i set-up the Vision Development Module 8.2.1 version. NI Vision Assistant 8.2 can be work and show the 30 days evaluation. However, i can't use the NI Vision 8.2 in the LabVIEW 7.1 and it will show the message-"1074396157" and say that is the unlicensed mode. Therefore, i checked the license day by NI License Manager and it show that NI Vision Assistant 8.2 ="30th Oct 2007"(30-days) but NI Vision is indicate the expired license file and the expired date is the expired date of the prevision Vision 8.2.0 Development Module?
I don't know why i can not use the NI-Vision 8.2 in the LabVIEW 7.1 and the license day is the previous expired day of Vision 8.2.0 Development Module
Thanks
Regrads
Steve SO

Hello all,
I am new here. I have problem to upgrade my LabView. First, I have installed LabView version 8.0 and then upgrade to 8.2.1 version. This installation CD I got from my lecturer and her give to me for use in my final year project. The problem now is, I can open the LabView 8.0, but after I installed the 8.2.1, this LabView version can not open and it show it is evaluation only and the serial number is not matched. When I asked to my lecturer, she told me the serial number is still same with the 8.0 version and it available to upgrade for 3 years. I also, try to ask to the technical support when I attend the LabView seminar here, and their said try to send the serial number to the NI support to check if there have any problem. But until now, there is no reply from them, and I hope anybody from here will help me and give me the idea what I have to do...
Thanks =)

PL/SQL Evaluation problem of where clause in case of NUMBER column type

I found the following problem in Oracle® Database 2 Day Developer's Guide 11g Release 1 (11.1) B28843-04:
The sole parameter of function eval_frequency is employee_id IN employees.employee_id%TYPE.
An ORA-01422 exception occurs when the execution reaches the following select command
SELECT e.hire_date
INTO hire_date
FROM employees e
WHERE employee_id= e.employee_id;
A possible cause of the error is that the type of employee_id is NUMBER while the employees.employee_id is NUMBER(6,0) . The result of the selection is the same as there were no WHERE clause at all.
Everything worked fine, when I declared a temporary variable of NUMBER(6,0) for storing the actual parameter of function and used this variable in the where clause, but I consider this "solution" as being no solution.
It is pointless to use %TYPE parameter of a function for flexibility if I must degrade this flexibility by a fixed declaration of a temporary variable of the same type as the column in question.
What is wrong?
The Developer'Guide I used, the Oracle Sql Developer I used or the PL/SQL version ?

Hi,
Welcome to the forum!
user8949829 wrote:
A possible cause of the error is that the type of employee_id is NUMBER while the employees.employee_id is NUMBER(6,0) . The result of the selection is the same as there I don't think so. The variable employee_id is defined as having the exact same type as the eponymous column. Even if it didn't, I believe Oracle will always implicity convert between datatypes when possible, rounding if necessary. That may cause errors, but it isn't causing this error.
No, the error has nothing to do with the data type. It has to do with the ambiguity of employee_id: is it a column, or is it a variable?
The default is that it means the column name, so
WHERE   employee_id = e.employee_idis equivalent to saying
WHERE   e.employee_id = e.employee_idwhich isn't quite the same thing as not having a WHERE clause; rows with NULL employee_id would still be excluded, if there were any.
I think it's best not to use variable names that are the same as column names. You could call the variable v_employee_id, or, since it's an IN-argument, in_employee_id.
If you must use a variable that can be mistaken for a column, then qulaify it with the name of the procedure, like this:
WHERE   eval_frequency.employee_id = e.employee_id
Everything worked fine, when I declared a temporary variable of NUMBER(6,0) for storing the actual parameter of function That makes sens. You probably gave that variable a name that couldn't be mistaken for a column in the table.
Edited by: Frank Kulash on Jan 12, 2011 8:27 PM

HR: Time Evaluation Problem (Urgent)

Hi HR Expert,
I am Working for HCM ABAP.
Can any one tell me how to get Data from Table ZL (used in Time Evaluation) in my ABAP Report Program.
Thanks in Advance,
Regards,
Rizwan

Hi Pavan,
First of all sorry for late reply but now i use your given Solution.
Thanks for help.
Rizwan

Novell Vibe 3.3 Virtual Evaluation Problem

Hi,
I have downloaded Novell Vibe 3.3 Virtual Evaluation trial version for testing
After installation, I start the Firefox to access http://localhost and it has redirect to http://localhost:8080/ssf/a/ return HTTP Status 404 error
Any idea about this case?
Thanks

Originally Posted by magic31
Sorry, that still leaves use clueless of where you are at/what you have done. ;-)
Installing Vibe "just out of the box" will most probably not work, as prerequisites need to be configured/set before starting the Vibe install (also have a look at the online documentation: Novell Documentation )
As for my previous questions:
Which OS (vendor/version, service pack level, arch [32/64bit]) have you installed Vibe on?
Which Java JDK version are you using, and how have you configured it?
Cheers,
Willem
Willem,
The OP is using the Virtual machine provided by Novell, it includes -
The Vibe Virtual Eval is a VMware image for use with VMware Player on Linux or Windows. It provides a "test drive" alternative to installing the Vibe evaluation software yourself. The Vibe Virtual Eval includes the following preinstalled software:
Novell Vibe 3.3, ready to configure for immediate use in your existing network environment
Novell Vibe 3.3 60-day evaluation license
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 32-bit
MySQL 5.0.67 database
DN

JRE 1.6 BID STUCK PROBLEM....

Hello..
I have developed an swing application using "netBeans with JDK 1.6".
I am facing a problem very commonly.....
During execution of the programme it gets stuck for more than 1 minute.....
Its a very big problem and my Client is not happy with that.
any body have any solution...
Is there any path to remove this problem....?
THx

Can you corrolate the pauses with anything particular in the game, or anything particular in the execution of the JRE itself. Does it only happen on your client's machine, or does it happen on all machines? (E.g., your development machine?)
On the chance that the problem is an overly long garbage collection, try running with -XX:+PrintGCTimeStamps -XX:+PrintGCDetails. That will tell you how long the garbage collections take, and let you know when they are happening, so you can decide if those are the problem. If garbage collection is taking more than 1 minute on a modest heap (<1GB?), then you should check what else is running on the machine and if you have physical memory enough for the Java object heap. Running the Java object heap out of the paging file is not a good idea.

Time Evaluation: Problem with Absence Quotas

Hi Gurus,
When vacation days are keyed in advance, and at a later date are made inactive as a result of a LOA. What happens in those cases is that SAP still considers the absence valid and it remains as deducted from the vacation quotas.
How can we prevent this and allow time eval to run correctly?
Regards
Naveen

Hi Gurus,
I will try to explain it more clearly.
An employee records a vacation well in advance. for example, today I have entered vacation in IT2001 from 23.12.2009 - 31.12.2009. But then tomorrow I go on a leave of absence meaning I am on LOA from 18.12.2009 - 31.12.2009.
What is happening now is since I recroded absence already, the quota has already been deducted. But later on the next day, even though I went on LOA, the system is not considering me as inactive and neglecting the absence which I recorded.
So how should I prevent this quota from deducting?
Regards
Naveen

Bid Evaluation Problem

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for