Big carrier problem in Germany and maybe in other countries (Tethering)

This goes to Apple!
Here in Germany there an 3 big SIM provieder (Telekom, Vodafone and O2).
They have their own official signed carrier from Apple.
What has to follow, if you dont have the right contract, you cant use features like personal hotspot.
Thats ok, but here are many other reseller, witch use the networks (AND carrier profiles) from telekom, vodafone and o2.
That reseller allow things like personal hotspot, but the carrier profile from the big bro provider cancle that option
and i cant edit the hotspot APN, cause its faded out.
The only one who can do something is Apple cause the carrier dont have interests to support other companys problems.
Anyway Apples first step was to create carrier profiles and ther second was to sign then.
Apple, please note that many people in the whole world dont like postpaid contracts (look in some statistice), cause many
prepaid reseller have better options.
What can i do without Apples support?
1. The easiest thig is to buy an other mobile phone with less restrictions
2. Jailbreak the iPhone
3. Live with this pain
Please Apple, let the user edit the whole network settings! Please!

i wrote to apple via the right feedback channel and nothing happens.
my hope is apple reacted if enough user talk about this issues. and here are many of them.
@KiltedTim
in germany there are 4 carriers tmobile, vodafone, o2 and eplus.
and we have a lot more (50++) reseller which use thier network.
e.g. my last provider was "FONIC" and they use the o2 network.
o2 does not allow everyone tethering. only for customers with the right contract
but i was able to tether (FONIC) cause o2 has (i think) a more flexible carrier profile sent to apple.
ok and now i am at EDEKA, a resseler that use the network of vodafone.
EDEKA allows tethering, but i cant edit the apn cause the iphone use the vodafone carrier settings which
are very restricted.
if i call apple, they say call your carrier.
if i call EDEKA, they say call vodafone.
if i call vodafone, they say its not our business.
this is a pain produced from apple.
btw. this thing "paid tethering" exists only at apple. if you have any other branded device
you can edit the apn and use tethering. why not? you have paid for the traffic and it doesnt matter how
you use it.
sry, my english is..

Similar Messages

Problem with my (And maybe all?) Y50 4K using an external monitor

Specs:16Gbs of RAM512GB SSD860M 4GBi7-4710HQ/etc/ Anyhow, I finally hooked this sucker up to my monitor (Via HDMI) and was having serious performance issues in games, and other things that would be gpu/cpu worthy. I've finally found part of the culprit, which is that when the laptop screen is closed, I get bad performance, when it is open, everything is working as intended. Basically I go from this (Open lid): https://i.imgur.com/AJujwly.jpgTo this (Closed lid): https://i.imgur.com/w9uAGlN.jpg (Usually runs even slower) I suspected that the computer may be ignoring my whitelist for BF4 (For the use of discreet graphics) upon closing the laptop and switching to integrated, however, I do not believe that's the case. Lid closed while discreet graphics is forced: 15 - 25 FPSLid open while integrated graphics is forced: 5 - 7 FPS So it appears the computer just has a weird bottleneck on the GPU/CPU whenever the lid to the laptop is closed. I have: 1. Looked through my bios2. Made sure high power settings stayed when the lid was closed/while plugged in or on battery.3. Made the computer stay awake when the lid is closed (Duh, don't know why people keep recommending this :L )4. Whitelisted the program via Nvidia's control panel to use Discreet graphics5. Tried using external monitor as extended display, and all other possible forms. All to no-avail. Anyone with a Lenovo Y50, or Lenovo Y50-4K want to confirm this issue is not just with myself? Thanks!

I am not Y50 user but I believe it is not bizzare at all. When you think of New Approach Thermal Design™ the producer is introducing in their recent models (link, link - look at the Temperature section) I can bet lot of heat dissipate up through the keyboard. Closing the lid you actually stop (or severely reduce) that heat dissipation This can cause throttling issue.

Problems with coverage and signal in other countryw

Hi, I am out of my country, I am traveling, and I have problems with coverage, the signal is not stable it come and go.
I have a Europe plan active with my operador, and with my previous Arc S, I dont have this problem.
Any solution ? Other people with this problem??
Regards

Please do let us know how you go. LTE coverage is still quite new and even non-existent in many places and as such this can certainly cause the problems you are facing.
What are your thoughts about this forum? Let us know by doing this short survey.
- Official Sony Xperia Support Staff
If you're new to our forums make sure that you have read our Discussion guidelines.
If you want to get in touch with the local support team for your country please visit our contact page.

Problems with Old and New Appraisals (switch HAP00 / REPLA)

Hello Experts,
I'm working on a HCM Global implementation and my country is joining now, and there are others countries that have already been there since 2002.
Through of switch HAP00/REPLA (transaction OOHAP_SETTINGS_PA), it is possible enable the use of Appraisal Systems subcomponent (Old Version) or Objective Setting and Appraisals subcomponent (New Version).
The others countries are using the Old version and we need use the New version.
When I activated of switch to flag u201CXu201D and after I tried create appraisals to employees through transactions APPCREATE or PHAP_PREPARE_PA, I could see only the new appraisals forms templates that Iu2019ve created through transaction HAP_CATALOG_PA and I could not see the old ones that I created through transaction OOB1.
After this problem I have tested activation of switch HAP00/REPLA and the screen in infotype 24, tab Appraisals where appraisee changed after the switch was activated, in other hands all the Appraisals on tab u201CAppraisals where appraiseeu201D disappeared and the columns are totally different comparing to old version.
My question is how can I activate (flag X) the switch HAP00/REPLA and without losing the existing Appraisals on TAB u201CAppraisals where appraiseeu201D in Infotype 0024?
Thanks in advance

Hi Lima,
The old appraisal system only supports appraisal templates with object type BA where as the new template uses object type VA. It is therefore you cannot view both of the appraisals in one tab 'Appraisals where Appraisee' or 'Appraisals where Appraiser'.
I suggest either use new or the old appraisal because by the time you run APPCREATE report for creating appraisals, the SAP systems queries the table OOHAP_SETTINGS_PA to identify which appraisal system is used. Based on the selection made in this table, the system opts for the settings.
I've went through your issue but cannot find the solution to it. It seems to be impossible.
Thanks,
Irfan Malik
SAP HR Consultant
SIEMENS Engineering Co. Ltd Pakistan

Hello community I have a big problem with my iphone 4s as precent problem with wifi and ios7. my phone was a champ when actualize this, eh degrade searched everything but I can not because I get the error 3194. I want a solution please

Hello community I have a big problem with my iphone 4s as precent problem with wifi and ios7. my phone was a champ when actualize this, eh degrade searched everything but I can not because I get the error 3194. I want a solution please

This support document http://support.apple.com/kb/ts4451 relates to the 3194 error. Generally this error has to do with trying to install an iOS that is not the most current. Maybe you tried to jailbreak the phone, or downgrade iOS? Any of this apply to you?

Email and big wifi problems.

Email and big wifi problems.
Why does it take 6 minutes to send a photo attachment when my iphone 4 will do it in 30 to 40 seconds ?
Why will my email account be recognised and log on only half the time?
Why does the wifi keep dropping out?
Why does the speed and signal vary when I'm sitting two feet away from by wifi router?
All settings in my phone have been reset twice as per advice from vodapone

Thanks very much, jjgraphics. I will grit my teeth and try India once more, as you suggest, and then get in touch with the moderators.
Karen.

I am trying to use the trial creative cloud software on a PC windows 8.1 - I've downloaded and removed Photoshop CC 2014 two times - every time I open the file it says there is a problem and it shuts down and closes. I can open indesign and maybe other ap

I am trying to use the trial creative cloud software on a PC windows 8.1 - I've downloaded and removed Photoshop CC 2014 two times - every time I open the file it says there is a problem and it shuts down and closes. I can open indesign and maybe other apps but photoshop no. Any ideas?

I don't think I can access the crash report? Excuse the ignorant questions I'm about to make am a relative tech novice.
Soo - as mentioned every time I open photoshop it crashes - it just says there's an error and the program will shut down and if there's a solution windows will notify me. Then nothing...
I've tried to look in photoshop files for the detailed crash report & the system event viewer but cannot find a file with those names. I've also looked in the windows files for files with those names but cannot find them either - so I don't know where to look.
Any guidance would be great.

The sound quality of my speaker suddenly got really poor when playing music or videos. Sounds like an old AM radio or Sputnik. Pretty sure it's hardware related but maybe not. Thoughts on what the problem might be and if it can be repaired?

The sound quality of my speaker suddenly got really poor when playing music or videos. Sounds like an old AM radio or Sputnik. Pretty sure it's hardware related but maybe not. Thoughts on what the problem might be and if it can be repaired?

The batterys the ipods come with are very sensetive somtimes they dont react right to the first couple of charges. Try fully charging it and then leaving it on until its completely drained a few times. If that doesnt work it might be a lemon.

Maybe carrier problems?

My service provider is Bell Mobility. I switched phones because my old phone broke, and I had a spare which is a Blackberry Pearl 8130. There is a few issues that I noticed with this phone. On my plan I have unlimited txt message and unlimited video and picture messaging. On the Pearl I can't send any pictures.. When I txt the character limit is 140, which is very frustrating, yet people can send me multiple txts, and the phone recognizes it, (i.e in the top corner it will say 1/2 and ect) But the Pearl will not, so I can receive multiple txts but I can't send them? I looked on the forums here, and everyone says it's the carrier service, but my old phone could send multiple txts! (and it wasn't a smartphone either), but my pearl won't let me? My pearl even is a Bell phone too. So my question is: Is this really a carrier problem? or the model? but yet people with the same model CAN send multiple txts
Thank you in advance

Possibly, but it's strange you get reception elsewhere. By identical, I assume they're all on AT&T, not Verizon or Sprint. If so, then I'd expect the same reception from yours that theirs get, unless you've got a metal case that could be interfering or you're just plain radioactive.
Try Settings>General>Resets>Reset Network Settings, and see if it makes a difference.

I want to buy Iphone 4S or Iphone 5 from USA and ship it to South Africa, will i have carrier problems?

I want to buy Iphone 4S or Iphone 5 from USA and ship it to South Africa, will i have carrier problems?

If you buy a phone from Apple online from USA you must have a credit card with a US address and have it shipped to that same address. If you chose a carrier it will be locked to that carrier. You must buy an UNLOCKED phone to use outside of the US, for the unsubsidized price. For unlocked phones you don't need to choose a carrier. the iPhone 5 is not yet available unlocked; only the 4S is sold as unlocked by Apple.
If you buy from the US Apple site you must return it to the US for warranty service.
LTE is the "next generation" cellular network standard. It is supported in the US by Verizon and AT&T.

I got my iphone sent from germany and now i am having reception problems, but it comes wiv a full warranty.can i be able to get a replacement one in the uk?

i got my iphone sent from germany and now i am having reception problems, but it comes wiv a full warranty.can i be able to get a replacement one in the uk?

Well, you learn something everyday don't you

I am having problems with video and high content webpages freezing. I am also getting pixel lines across my webpages. Maybe two or three lines. I was running os 10.4 but I just up graded to 10.6 the other day. I have 2GB of RAM.

I am having problems with video and high content webpages freezing. I am also getting pixel lines across my webpages. Maybe two or three lines. I was running os 10.4 but I just up graded to 10.6 the other day. I have 2GB of RAM.

Exactlly which model iMac do you have?
see > How to identify iMac models
Unfortunately that is not all that uncommon for the Early Intel iMac's given there age and the fact that the air intakes are probably choked with dust. Then add the extra heat caused by running a more intense OS X which is causing it to run a little warmer than normal and putting extra stress on the graphic and display components.
My 6½ year old 17" Early 2006 Core Duo w/2GB of RAM is also running 10.6.8 and is also starting to get a single line that (knock on wood) goes away after a few minutes, while many others started getting permanent ones after 2 or 3 years. One thing that I think has helped, is that about every 3 or 4 months I shutdown and vigorously vacuum out the bottom grill work and small vent under the stand to keep it running cool.
On that note: unfortunately I can only suggest that you clean your intake vents and hope that no permanent or irreversible damage has been done.

Problem with Preview and PSD files - random gray square

Hi guys, hope you can help...
I've got a problem with Preview and PSD files.
If I open in Preview both an original jpg straight from my reflex and the photoshop version of the same picture, the psd file presents a gray square (of what it seems unrendered image) in a random area of the photo (sometimes in the center.). The square is quite big...
If I zoom in or zoom out it disappears...if I scroll to another photo and then back to the psd, the square it's there again...sometimes in a different position.
I've tried the same psd on my older iMac with leopard...and got no problem at all.
I suspect it got something to do with my Ati...
(this is the second iMac 27...the first went back for gray banding on the lcd screen and flickering and yellow tinge........)
Thanks for your help.
DAve.

maybe I'm onto something...
I've just found out that opening Preview in 32bit mode (instead of default 64bit) works flawlessly with any psd files. If I switch back to 64bit mode, Preview is much faster but the gray square comes back...
It seems like the i7 is much faster than the Ati....
Any more realistic ideas?

Performance problems with XMLTABLE and XMLQUERY involving relational data

Hello-
Is anyone out there using XMLTABLE or XMLQUERY with more than a toy set of data? I am running into serious performance problems tyring to do basic things such as:
* Combine records in 10 relational tables into a single table of XMLTYPE records using XMLTABLE. This hangs indefinitely for any more than 800 records. Oracle has confirmed that this is a problem and is working on a fix.
* Combine a single XMLTYPE record with several relational code tables into a single XMLTYPE record using XMLQUERY and ora:view() to insert code descriptions after each code. Performance is 10 seconds for 10 records (terrible) passing a batch of records , or 160 seconds for one record (unacceptable!). How can it take 10 times longer to process 1/10th the number of records? Ironically, the query plan says it will do a full table scan of records for the batch, but an index access for the one record passed to the XMLQUERY.
I am rapidly losing faith in XML DB, and desparately need some hints on how to work around these performance problems, or at least some assurance that others have been able to get this thing to perform.

<Note>Long post, sorry.</Note>
First, thanks for the responses above. I'm impressed with the quality of thought put into them. (Do the forum rules allow me to offer rewards? :) One suggestion in particular made a big performance improvement, and I’m encouraged to hear of good performance in pure XML situations. Unfortunately, I think there is a real performance challenge in two use cases that are pertinent to the XML+relational subject of this post and probably increasingly common as XML DB usage increases:
•     Converting legacy tabular data into XML records; and
•     Performing code table lookups for coded values in XML records.
There are three things I want to accomplish with this post:
•     Clarify what we are trying to accomplish, which might expose completely different approaches than I have tried
•     Let you know what I tried so far and the rationale for my approach to help expose flaws in my thinking and share what I have learned
•     Highlight remaining performance issues in hopes that we can solve them
What we are trying to accomplish:
•     Receive a monthly feed of 10,000 XML records (batched together in text files), each containing information about an employee, including elements that repeat for every year of service. We may need to process an annual feed of 1,000,000 XML records in the future.
•     Receive a one-time feed of 500,000 employee records stored in about 10 relational tables, with a maximum join depth of 2 or 3. This is inherently a relational-to-XML process. One record/second is minimally acceptable, but 10 records/sec would be better.
•     Consolidate a few records (from different providers) for each employee into a single record. Given the data volume, we need to achieve a minimum rate of 10 records per second. This may be an XML-only process, or XML+relational if code lookups are done during consolidation.
•     Allow the records to be viewed and edited, with codes resolved into user-friendly descriptions. Since a user is sitting there, code lookups done when a record is viewed (vs. during consolidation) should not take more than 3 seconds total. We have about 20 code tables averaging a few hundred rows each, though one has 450,000 rows.
As requested earlier, I have included code at the end of this post for example tables and queries that accurately (but simply) replicate our real system.
Why we did and why:
•     Stored the source XML records as CLOBS: We did this to preserve the records exactly as they were certified and sent from providers. In addition, we always access the entire XML record as a whole (e.g., when viewing a record or consolidating employee records), so this storage model seemed like a good fit. We can copy them into another format if necessary.
•     Stored the consolidated XML employee records as “binary XML”. We did this because we almost always access a single, entire record as a whole (for view/edit), but might want to create some summary statistics at some point. Binary XML seemed the best fit.
•     Used ora:view() for both tabular source records and lookup tables. We are not aware of any alternatives at this time. If it made sense, most code tables could be pre-converted into XML documents, but this seemed risky from a performance standpoint because the lookups use both code and date range constraints (the meaning of codes changes over time).
•     Stored records as XMLTYPE columns in a table with other key columns on the table, plus an XMLTYPE metadata column. We thought this would facilitate pulling a single record (or a few records for a given employee) quickly. We knew this might be unnecessary given XML indexes and virtual columns, but were not experienced with those and wanted the comfort of traditional keys. We did not used XMLTYPE tables or the XML Repository for documents.
•     Used XMLTABLE to consolidate XML records by looping over each distinct employee ID in the source batch. We also tried XMLQUERY and it seems to perform about the same. We can achieve 10 to 20 records/second if we do not do any code lookups during consolidation, just meeting our performance requirement, but still much slower than expected.
•     Used PL/SQL with XMLFOREST to convert tabular source records to XML by looping over distinct employee IDs. We tried this outside PL/SQL both with XMLFOREST and XMLTABLE+ora:view(), but it hangs in both cases for more than 800 records (a known/open issue). We were able to get it to work by using an explicit cursor to loop over distinct employee IDs (rather than processing all records at once within the query). The performance is one record/second, which is minimally acceptable and interferes with other database activity.
•     Used XMLQUERY plus ora:view() plus XPATH constraints to perform code lookups. When passing a single employee record, the response time ranges from 1 sec to 160 sec depending on the length of the record (i.e., number of years of service). We achieved a 5-fold speedup using an XMLINDEX (thank you Marco!!). The result may be minimally acceptable, but I’m baffled why the index would be needed when processing a single XML record. Other things we tried: joining code tables in the FOR...WHERE clauses, joining code tables using LET with XPATH constraints and LET with WHERE clause constraints, and looking up codes individually via JDBC from the application code at presentation time. All those approaches were slower. Note: the difference I mentioned above in equality/inequality constraint performance was due to data record variations not query plan variations.
What issues remain?
We have a minimally acceptable solution from a performance standpoint with one very awkward PL/SQL workaround. The performance of a mixed XML+relational data query is still marginal IMHO, until we properly utilize available optimizations, fix known problems, and perhaps get some new query optimizations. On the last point, I think the query plan for tabular lookups of codes in XML records is falling short right now. I’m reminded of data warehousing in the days before hash joins and star join optimization. I would be happy to be wrong, and just as happy for viable workarounds if I am right!
Here are the details on our code lookup challenge. Additional suggestions would be greatly appreciated. I’ll try to post more detail on the legacy table conversion challenge later.
-- The main record table:
create table RECORDS (
SSN varchar2(20),
XMLREC sys.xmltype
xmltype column XMLREC store as binary xml;
create index records_ssn on records(ssn);
-- A dozen code tables represented by one like this:
create table CODES (
CODE varchar2(4),
DESCRIPTION varchar2(500)
create index codes_code on codes(code);
-- Some XML records with coded values (the real records are much more complex of course):
-- I think this took about a minute or two
DECLARE
ssn varchar2(20);
xmlrec xmltype;
i integer;
BEGIN
xmlrec := xmltype('<?xml version="1.0"?>
<Root>
<Id>123456789</Id>
<Element>
<Subelement1><Code>11</Code></Subelement1>
<Subelement2><Code>21</Code></Subelement2>
<Subelement3><Code>31</Code></Subelement3>
</Element>
<Element>
<Subelement1><Code>11</Code></Subelement1>
<Subelement2><Code>21</Code></Subelement2>
<Subelement3><Code>31</Code></Subelement3>
</Element>
<Element>
<Subelement1><Code>11</Code></Subelement1>
<Subelement2><Code>21</Code></Subelement2>
<Subelement3><Code>31</Code></Subelement3>
</Element>
</Root>
for i IN 1..100000 loop
insert into records(ssn, xmlrec) values (i, xmlrec);
end loop;
commit;
END;
-- Some code data like this (ignoring date ranges on codes):
DECLARE
description varchar2(100);
i integer;
BEGIN
description := 'This is the code description ';
for i IN 1..3000 loop
insert into codes(code, description) values (to_char(i), description);
end loop;
commit;
end;
-- Retrieve one record while performing code lookups. Takes about 5-6 seconds...pretty slow.
-- Each additional lookup (times 3 repeating elements in the data) adds about 1 second.
-- A typical real record has 5 Elements and 20 Subelements, meaning more than 20 seconds to display the record
-- Note we are accessing a single XML record based on SSN
-- Note also we are reusing the one test code table multiple times for convenience of this test
select xmlquery('
for $r in Root
return
<Root>
<Id>123456789</Id>
{for $e in $r/Element
    return
    <Element>
      <Subelement1>
        {$e/Subelement1/Code}
<Description>
{ora:view("disaac","codes")/ROW[CODE=$e/Subelement1/Code]/DESCRIPTION/text() }
</Description>
</Subelement1>
<Subelement2>
{$e/Subelement2/Code}
<Description>
{ora:view("disaac","codes")/ROW[CODE=$e/Subelement2/Code]/DESCRIPTION/text()}
</Description>
</Subelement2>
<Subelement3>
{$e/Subelement3/Code}
<Description>
{ora:view("disaac","codes")/ROW[CODE=$e/Subelement3/Code]/DESCRIPTION/text() }
</Description>
</Subelement3>
</Element>
</Root>
' passing xmlrec returning content)
from records
where ssn = '10000';
The plan shows the nested loop access that slows things down.
By contrast, a functionally-similar SQL query on relational data will use a hash join and perform 10x to 100x faster, even for a single record. There seems to be no way for the optimizer to see the regularity in the XML structure and perform a corresponding optimization in joining the code tables. Not sure if registering a schema would help. Using structured storage probably would. But should that be necessary given we’re working with a single record?
Operation Object
|SELECT STATEMENT ()
| SORT (AGGREGATE)
| NESTED LOOPS (SEMI)
| TABLE ACCESS (FULL) CODES
| XPATH EVALUATION ()
| SORT (AGGREGATE)
| NESTED LOOPS (SEMI)
| TABLE ACCESS (FULL) CODES
| XPATH EVALUATION ()
| SORT (AGGREGATE)
| NESTED LOOPS (SEMI)
| TABLE ACCESS (FULL) CODES
| XPATH EVALUATION ()
| SORT (AGGREGATE)
| XPATH EVALUATION ()
| SORT (AGGREGATE)
| XPATH EVALUATION ()
| TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) RECORDS
| INDEX (RANGE SCAN) RECORDS_SSN
With an xmlindex, the same query above runs in about 1 second, so is about 5x faster (0.2 sec/lookup), which is almost good enough. Is this the answer? Or is there a better way? I’m not sure why the optimizer wants to scan the code tables and index into the (one) XML record, rather than the other way around, but maybe that makes sense if the optimizer wants to use the same general plan as when the WHERE clause constraint is relaxed to multiple records.
-- Add an xmlindex. Takes about 2.5 minutes
create index records_record_xml ON records(xmlrec)
indextype IS xdb.xmlindex;
Operation Object
|SELECT STATEMENT ()
| SORT (GROUP BY)
| FILTER ()
| NESTED LOOPS ()
| FAST DUAL ()
| TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) SYS113473_RECORDS_R_PATH_TABLE
| INDEX (RANGE SCAN) SYS113473_RECORDS_R_PATHID_IX
| SORT (AGGREGATE)
| FILTER ()
| TABLE ACCESS (FULL) CODES
| FILTER ()
| NESTED LOOPS ()
| FAST DUAL ()
| TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) SYS113473_RECORDS_R_PATH_TABLE
| INDEX (RANGE SCAN) SYS113473_RECORDS_R_PATHID_IX
| SORT (GROUP BY)
| FILTER ()
| NESTED LOOPS ()
| FAST DUAL ()
| TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) SYS113473_RECORDS_R_PATH_TABLE
| INDEX (RANGE SCAN) SYS113473_RECORDS_R_PATHID_IX
| SORT (AGGREGATE)
| FILTER ()
| TABLE ACCESS (FULL) CODES
| FILTER ()
| NESTED LOOPS ()
| FAST DUAL ()
| TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) SYS113473_RECORDS_R_PATH_TABLE
| INDEX (RANGE SCAN) SYS113473_RECORDS_R_PATHID_IX
| SORT (GROUP BY)
| FILTER ()
| NESTED LOOPS ()
| FAST DUAL ()
| TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) SYS113473_RECORDS_R_PATH_TABLE
| INDEX (RANGE SCAN) SYS113473_RECORDS_R_PATHID_IX
| SORT (AGGREGATE)
| FILTER ()
| TABLE ACCESS (FULL) CODES
| FILTER ()
| NESTED LOOPS ()
| FAST DUAL ()
| TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) SYS113473_RECORDS_R_PATH_TABLE
| INDEX (RANGE SCAN) SYS113473_RECORDS_R_PATHID_IX
| SORT (AGGREGATE)
| FILTER ()
| NESTED LOOPS ()
| FAST DUAL ()
| TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) SYS113473_RECORDS_R_PATH_TABLE
| INDEX (RANGE SCAN) SYS113473_RECORDS_R_PATHID_IX
| SORT (AGGREGATE)
| TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) SYS113473_RECORDS_R_PATH_TABLE
| INDEX (RANGE SCAN) SYS113473_RECORDS_R_PATHID_IX
| TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) RECORDS
| INDEX (RANGE SCAN) RECORDS_SSN
Am I on the right path, or am I totally using the wrong approach? I thought about using XSLT but was unsure how to reference the code tables.
I’ve done the best I can constraining the main record to a single row passed to the XMLQUERY. Given Mark’s post (thanks!) should I be joining and constraining the code tables in the SQL WHERE clause too? That’s going to make the query much more complicated, but right now we’re more concerned about performance than complexity.

I live in Germany and have tried to download Dreamweaver trial version in ENGLISH and all I get is the download in German. How do I get it in ENGLISH?

I live in Germany, and speak German but not the technical German that Dreamweaver uses. I need the program to download in English. I have tried hitting the USA choice, and they re-direct me to the German site, and again the download is in German. All the teaching videos are in English and it is too big a challenge to try and figure out what they mean in German. I need an english language download. Can anyone help me? Thanks.

Thanks again, I tried it and it downloaded in English. Now if these 70 year old eyes can "see" maybe I can get something done.

Big carrier problem in Germany and maybe in other countries (Tethering)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for