Biiling Plan

Hi Experts,
My client wants to enter the dates manually in the sales order in the billing plan. Every time a date is decided upon they change the sales order and change the date of the billing to a new date. But it is allowing more than 100% for billing .
Is there any way by which we can control the billing to 100 percent only and not more.
Thanks in advance.
Deb
5
Edited by: Debsapsd on Jun 30, 2011 8:08 AM

Dear Friend,
Go to T-Code SE16N.
Give Table Name as FPLA & press Enter. You will see a list of Field Name below.
Here there is a Field Bill. Plan. No. (RFPLN).
Here click on More (arrow in the More column) Here make the selection value as blank (space) & execute.
Generate the list & you will have the desired outcome.
Also if you cannot do the above then simply the entire list of FPLA & filter the output list for Blank. You will have your list ready...
THanks,
Jignesh Mehta

Similar Messages

Milestone billing for non project case

Hi,
I have a building/room that is going to be rented. I need to adopt Down Payment (%) with open date, which means the customer is have flexibility to choose when he/she wants to finish the payment. e.g: for a wedding, today the customer pay DP, let say 30% of total, and he/she will use the building next year and pay the remaining.
I try to explore the proper / suitable solution for this case in SD. I try to use milestone billing plan. I copy as SO doc type OR, copy as item category TOA, copy as billing doc type FAZ and FAS , and use milestone billing plan in item level while creating the SO doc.
My question is, before I continue to use it, I want to know if It is okay to use milestone biiling plan for non project case? and what is the possible effects?
thank you,
Regards,
Harris

Hi all SAP ers...
I want to continue my first question.
1. Right now I am considering, is it the right concept to use millestone billing plan in my case?
2. If I use Milestone Billing Plan for Down Payment Process, which point of view do we use? Is it I am the project owner and then I bill the vendor OR I am the Vendor who sends the invoice to the customer/project owner?
3. Is it "okay", if I use milestone billing plan ? (If the point of view is I am the Vendor who sends the invoice to the customer)
Regards,
Harris

Downpayment Mapping

Dear gurus
how to map Downpayment process. Brfeore creating Sales orde 50% amount will be received & before PGI another 50% will be received, Reight we r using f-29 for downpayment is this only way or any other way is there?
and i can't go for biiling plans why becoz my documents are delivery relavent.
Can any one give idea reg this
Rajendra

HI,
this would be useful to you,
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/59/ac922bcb0411d2acbe0000e8a5bd28/content.htm
Vrajesh

Regarding invoice Creation

Hi All-
Please help with the below situation.
sales order is created.
There are two line items exist in sales order.
line item 20 is a sub item for lineitem 10.
Lie item 10 item category is "ZABC"
Line item 20 item category is :ZCBA"
when we check the item category details in config by going T code VOV7 ,
Item category ZABC has Billing Plan type (Periodic Billing).
and Billing relavance indiacator is "I"( Orfder relevant billing -Biiling Plan)
For Item category ZCBA billing plan was not set.
Billing relevance set as "B"(relevant for order related billing :status according to order quantity)
Both line items are not relevant for delivery as it was set in the respective item categories.
So when i create a billing by going to VF01 (order reference) , Invoice got split in two invoices.
Now the requirement is to create a single invoice.
I have checked in copy control routines but not found any thing related to spliiting the invoice with some selection criteria.
can any one tell me how to identify that why the invoice got split ??
Thanks in advance.

Please check the copy control routines from sales order to invoices. there might be some programming present in the routines that makes it do this. Also checking the invoice creation log helps to determine the reason behind the split.

Regarding Invoice split

Hi All-
Please help with the below situation.
sales order is created.
There are two line items exist in sales order.
line item 20 is a sub item for lineitem 10.
Lie item 10 item category is "ZABC"
Line item 20 item category is :ZCBA"
when we check the item category details in config by going T code VOV7 ,
Item category ZABC has Billing Plan type (Periodic Billing).
and Billing relavance indiacator is "I"( Orfder relevant billing -Biiling Plan)
For Item category ZCBA billing plan was not set.
Billing relevance set as "B"(relevant for order related billing :status according to order quantity)
Both line items are not relevant for delivery as it was set in the respective item categories.
So when i create a billing by going to VF01 (order reference) , Invoice got split in two invoices.
Now the requirement is to create a single invoice.
I have checked in copy control routines but not found any thing related to spliiting the invoice with some selection criteria.
can any one tell me how to identify that why the invoice got split ??
Thanks in advance.

Hi,
Go to Vf03.Enetr first invoice number and in menu bar follow the path
Environment -Split analysis.
Enetr the second invoice number here.and enetr.
Here you can check why the invoice is getting split.And the fields which is causing this.
Reward points if useful
Regards,
Amrish Purohit

Periodic billing plan

Hi Gurus
Please help me find the reason as why the periodic billing is carried out in advance eventhough the Inadvance indicator is not set.
Billing dates in our billing plan are,
Settlement              To                       Biiling date
01.09.2011         30.09.2011          20.09.2011
01.10.2011         31.10.2011          20.10.2011
01.11.2011         30.11.2011          20.11.2011
01.12.2011         31.12.2011          20.12.2011
When invoiced, system bills all the four lines. Also want to know if it's imp. to set billing block for dates.

Hi
When you run the billing program SDBILLDL (VF04) it simply reads the VKDFS table to pick up
all due documents (witihn the selection criteria provided in the screen)
In this example above if you input a 'Billing Date to' value of today for example only the billing
plan lines that were dated today or before in VKDFS would be billed.
With billing plans submit SDBILLDL with a 'Billing Date to' maintained to avoid billing future dates
or use billing blocks as suggested previously.
Hope this helps
Rgds
Brian

Error while updating a plan

Hi,
I have encountered an error while updating a plan. While i update the uplan , the grid gets filled but it throws a message stating
"Maximum Number of Result Blocks has been reached"
Maximum number of Result Blocks has been reached.
[Oracle BAM Enterprise Link error code: DC -- 0x1, DC -- 0xD4]
Error while processing the data for the step 'Grid'
[Oracle BAM Enterprise Link error code: DC -- 0x1, DC -- 0x83]
Maximum number of Result Blocks has been reached.
[Oracle BAM Enterprise Link error code: DC -- 0x1, DC -- 0xD4]
Error while processing the data for the step 'Grid'
[Oracle BAM Enterprise Link error code: DC -- 0x1, DC -- 0x83]
Update of Plan "deposittest created 7/19/2007 5:11:50 PM" failed.
[Oracle BAM Enterprise Link error code: PlanMgr -- 0x1, PlanMgr -- 0xD5]
The data updation stops after the row count 49900.
Please help to resolve this error .
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Lathika

Hi,
in BAM-Administrator you should rraise Parameter "MaxResultBlocks".
BAM originaly is al licensed Software from Group1 named "Sagent Data Flow".
This may help searching the web.
Greetz,
GOI

Data Back Up Plan

Hi,
My internal hard drive, 320 GB, 'fully loaded', on my 2 year old imac crashed 10 days ago.
Since I had the extended warranty, the 'local' Apple store replaced the internal drive within hours
at no charge and even loaded Snow Leopard and iLife. With a well updated TimeMachine on an external hard drive I was back working at my imac the next day. When I realized after the crash that my precious 250 GB of pictures in Adobe Lightroom and iPhoto, along with a few videos were saved on just one older Maxtor external hard drive, it made me think about a more solid back up procedure.
The idea now is to move all big volume files to one or more external hard drives.
In the meantime I have transfered the iPhoto and Lightroom files to an external hard drive (WD MyBook II, 2x1 TB in RAID 1), which gives me the first layer of back up: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/552322-REG/WesternDigital_WDH2Q20000N_2TB_My_BookStudio.html
In a second step I am planning on making a clone (with SuperDuper or CarbonCopy) of the internal hard drive (mainly operating systems and applications) and the external hard drive (all big data files) on one additional external hard drive, i.e. OWC Mercury Elite AL Pro Raid 0, 2 TB http://eshop.macsales.com/item/Other%20World%20Computing/ME8Q7T20GB64/
I am looking for advise here:
Do SuperDuper or CarbonCopy (I only know the names from the discussion forums) allow me to make a clone from 2 separate hard drives
Would it be good practice to create a large clone of ultimately 2 TB with ALL files or wouldn't it be better to make 2 clones , one of the internal and one of the external drive.
TimeMachine had helped me to get back to work quickly after the crash. I expect to fill the WD 1TB drive rather quickly. Where should I plan on using Time Machine in my new back up plan?
Would appreciate comments and advise.

reckling wrote:
Do SuperDuper or CarbonCopy (I only know the names from the discussion forums) allow me to make a clone from 2 separate hard drives
No. A clone is of your boot volume only. But those apps can make separate backups of multiple drives, either to multiple drives or to separate partitions on the same drive.
Would it be good practice to create a large clone of ultimately 2 TB with ALL files or wouldn't it be better to make 2 clones , one of the internal and one of the external drive.
2 is not only better, but your only option with CCC or SD.
TimeMachine had helped me to get back to work quickly after the crash. I expect to fill the WD 1TB drive rather quickly. Where should I plan on using Time Machine in my new back up plan?
There is no "right" answer, just a number of possibilities. Some thoughts:
You could use TIme Machine to back up both your internal HD and the WD set to the OWC, if it's at least twice the size of the data on both. It looks like it can be configured as a +Concatenated RAID set+ (both drives into a single 2 TB volume), so that should work well.
Or use TM to back up your OSX drive, and CCC or SD to back-up the media drive.
The CCC or SD backups usually aren't practical to run more than once a day, so consider them your "secondary" backups.
Also strongly consider getting something off-site (safe deposit box, workplace, relative's house, etc.), so you're also protected against fire, flood, theft, direct lightning strike on your power lines. Portable external HDs are great for that. Some things may even be appropriate to take to DVDs.
The problem with that is, there aren't many portables over about 640 GB (LaCie has a 1 TB for either $300 or $400: http://www.lacie.com/us/products/product.htm?pid=11357).
CCC is donationware, so you can use it free for a while. If you decide to keep it, send them some $$ so they can keep it up to date. SD has a free version, but to do updates (rather than a full replacement) or automatic scheduling, you need the paid version (about $30). Either is available via Google, VersionTracker.com, or MacUpdate.com.

BOM is not getting displayed in case of centralized planning plant.

Dear All,
there are 2 plants for which we have centralized planning. the users have created Equipment BOM for the two plants. but in case of the second plant for which the planning plant is different from the maintenance plant, the BOM is not getting displayed in the Maintenance Order (i.e. in the components tab).
kindly through some light on it. whether i have to do some settings for it.
Regards,
Ritesh Kapoor

Hi,
Yes while using IH01, i have ticked the BOM explosion option, but when i am giving the plant there then only it is displaying the BOM of that equipment.
Also when i am creating an order for the same equipment, then it does not displays the BOm & shows the message which i have written in my previous mail.
Ritesh

Pension plans in portal

Hi,
We have pension plans and the employees should be able to change the data anytime.
Open enrollment is for one month only and in that dental,medical,life plans are configured But only pension plans should exists for employees all time in portal.
Can anyone suggest me how to solve this issue
Thanks,
Usha

closed

Pension Plans

Hi,
We have pension plans.Our Customer requirement is that to change the pension plans by an employee at any time without any time restriction.
But the open enrollment option is for only 1 month in a year.
Can anyone suggest how I can solve this issue so that employee can only change pension plans at any time.
Thanks,
Usha

closed

Report for Planned vs Purchase Order(Qty and rate)

Hi
I have the following issue. My client is raising Purchasing requisition and Purchase Orders in Me51N and ME21n respectively. The Project Structure is used only to plan the quantities and rates whereas no PR is released from it. But the components are attached. Now if i make use of the code CN52N, i am getting the planned quantity and unit rate for the planned value whereas no Purchase requisition number or purchase order number is updated in it.
My requirement is that both planned quantity, rate along with Purchase order quantity and rate should be available in a report.
1. Is there any setting that we can make so that the details are updated in cn52N (or)
2. is there any other report with those details (or)
3. Should that be achived only through ABAP.
Please suggest.
Raghav

There are a few reports that you can use to display STO requisitions and orders, by supplying plant, material, or MD04 like was mentioned.
The only thing that you don't have in a report is the link to the production order. In SAP in a MTS situation there's no fixed link (pegging) between the requirement (STO) and the supply (prod Ord).
You can view the pegging dynamically, for example in MD04.
Edited by: Mario Adler on Oct 27, 2011 12:13 PM

A/P & Consignment data pull to Planning Cube.....

I put this in "BC & Extractors" section, but did not get any response.....
Need couple of clarifications (brief background is provided.....):
1. We do DELTA extractions using 0FI_AP_3 adn 0FI_AR_4 to a base cube which includes both 'Open' and 'Cleared'
items. From this cube we do a DELTA load to a Planning Cube on a DAILY basis. We filter the data on Company Code
and 'Item Status' (OnlyOPEN Items) for Planning purposes. The key figure pulled to Planning Cube is '0DEB_CRE_DC'.
The bsae cube has data at Line Item Document level, where as the planning cube is only at Customer & Vendor level.
The question is - Will this Daily DELTA to Planning cube with filter on Open Item bring correct key figure? For example,
if the status of one of the items pulled as OPEN in earlier Delta changes to "CLEARED" the subsequent day, will the Key
Figure reflect the changes and show correct value? Is there any impact on the key figure due to the filter on Open Item?
My thinking is the key figure 0DEB_DRE_DC will reflect he correct number (adjsuted) since it is a summated key figure.
I could be totally wrong and want to understand this with comments from experts.
2. Has anyone worked with pulling Consignment (SMI) data into Planning cube? We pull this data using a generic extractor
from a SAP table "RKWA" with some logic. Since I pull A/P data that contains SMI & Non-SMI transactions. To avoid
Double Counting, how can I avoid bringing in the SMI transactions from A/P? There is no flag to diffferentiate the SMI /
Non-SMI transactions....
I am hoping someone has worked in these area to offer expert comments/ recommendations.
Thanks.. Shaun
Please post one question only once
Edited by: Vikram Srivastava on Aug 13, 2010 1:02 PM

Hello Lee,
For your first question as you are using the Filter on the status of the record,
lets say today the status is OPen and as a part of the filter the Delta will be able to pick this record as the status is OPen but if the status is changed to Closed tomorrow then this record will be completely ignored and hence in the next level target you will not have the right status at all.
So you need to plan your filters accordingly.
Hope this helps.
Thanks
Murali

MRP - Auto creation of del schedule lines based on planned delivery time

Hi,
We have activated MRP (type PD) where Purchase requiesition is auto created by system for requirement quantity. We require to optimize delivery schedule in such a way that entire PR quantity is broken into various delivery schedule based on planned delivery time and requirement. Scenario can be further explained with following example.
Material Requirement for a month is say 1,25,000 units
Closing Stock say 25,000 units
PR Generated by system for 1,00,000 units. The entire quantity is schdulled with only one delivery schedule line as per planned delivery time.
The requirement is to generate multiple delivery schedule lines automatically in Purchase requisition based on planned delivery time so that Purchase orders can be placed with system generated delivery schedule lines.
How can it be achieved ?
Regards,
Nirav Kinkhabwala

Nirav,
This subject has been discussed repeatedly in this and other forums. I must assume that you overlooked the rules of engagement, which state that you should first search the forums and other public sites, before posting questions here.
Standard SAP MRP cannot be made to generate multiple items in a Purchase requisition. The functionality you seek is usually achieved when converting purchase reqs to Purchase orders, where many single purchase reqs can be adopted into a single Purchase order.
You also might want to investigate use of Vendor Scheduling agreements.
Best Regards,
DB49

Can I merge several different Verizon plans (different family members each have own plans) into one plan (i.e. can I take over all their lines), if all lines on all plans are on Edge?

I was originally told by Verizon that if I joined, I can eventually take over the lines of various family members. Now that I've joined, and my family members all upgraded their phones and are on Edge, Verizon is telling us that we can't merge into one plan (because Edge lines can't be transferred to another account).
Is this true, and, if so, what is my recourse since I was lied to.

Well, yes and no (as far as being lied to). I asked on several occasions (I have the chat transcripts to prove it) if there would be any issue if the lines were all already on Edge, and was told each time that under no circumstances would there be any issue. The latest being today (I know it's after the fact, but I wanted proof that this is what the chat people are saying). I asked "I have currently have an account with 3 phones on Edge. My brother and his wife, and my parents, also have plans all on Edge. I would like to 'take over' their lines. I want to make sure there is no issue with the Edge plan and that I can simply 'take over' their lines with no problems." I was told "Yes. That would be correct." Again, this is what I was told in the past as well (my original post didn't make clear the timing of the chats and upgrades to Edge..). Every time I chatted I mentioned that the accounts were going to be on Edge or (later on) were already on Edge. Even before my family members upgraded to Edge, not one single chat or phone representative (and my brother asked the same thing in a store) mentioned NOT to upgrade to Edge because it couldn't be transferred. Everyone just said yep, no problem. The ONLY reason I even joined Verizon (I was on Straight Talk) was because of the More Everything and Edge plans (we wanted a family plan with 6 people and over 10GB so we'd each save $25/line). Otherwise I never would have joined Verizon and my family wouldn't have upgraded either.

Biiling Plan

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for