Billing is not flowing from CRM to R/3(in Lease asset accounting)

Dear all,
We are working on Lease Asset Management. In our operations CRM is the Front End and R/3 is the back end. The billing flows from CRM to R/3 through a background job.
The problem is, Some of the billing document got stuck in G error, that is "Error detected in transfer to accounting", While Transfering the billing documents through" /BEA/CRMB12 - Sales -> Billing -> Transfer Billing Documents to Accounting"
System throwing the two types of error messages
1. Object not known in CO ( Message Class IAOM / No. 028 )
2. For Comination: 4F20/INTP(*interim period*) ,Transaction Type is Not Mapped in R/3 Table: ZMAPBILL_COND
For the first type of error, The CO assignments in
1.IAOM_ASSIGNMENTS
2.IAOM_EXT_OBJ_INF
Entreis are maintained in these two tables. Please let us know any other settings to be maintained in FI/CO and LAM to resolve this issue.
Please respond ASAP
Thanks and Regards
Priyadarshini

Hi Priyadarshini,
I do not have SAP CRM system in front of me, but the error # Message Class IAOM / No. 028 is shown when u r passing billing doc to R/3.
The error is more related to Internal Order Controlling area in R/3.
IAOM_ASSIGNMENTS has Contract guid / Billing guid for which IO posting is done. Message no 28 , i beleive no assignment found when posting.
check FM IAOM_GET_ACCOUNT_ASSIGNMENT which throws error.
Also as per my Leasing knowledge 4F20 will be passed to R/3, and there is setting for statical condition or non statical condition, check with ur FI lead
Hope u get some hint.
Regards,
Deven
Do reward points if u find useful answer

Similar Messages

Help needed-Survey template data not flowing from CRM to Mobile & V V

Hi experts,
We have a requirement to create a custom survey template and pass it to mobile. The data flow should be to and fro. as in; from CRM to Mobile Application and vice versa.
Currently we are facing an issue in this that the data if not being passed properly from the CRM TO Moblie.
As i am new to the middleware concepts, i am not sure how to go about analysing if my data in the BDocs for the survey template if correct or not.Some data is present for the survey in the Bdoc(xml), but i am not sure if this xml value is correct or not as the Bdoc table entry (xml value)seems to have been truncated(i cannot view the entire xml there wen i try to open the BDoc fields in SMW01).
any pointers to this is highly appreciated.
Thanks
Swapna.

May be this thread will help
v('APP_USER') not returning HTMLDB user
regards,
Shijesh

Middleware - Delta load is not working from CRM to R/3

Hi Experts,
Our client is using SAP-R/3 4.7 and CRM 5.0
Connectivity was established via Middleware and initial load of Customizing objects and Master data( Customer and Material) was finished successfully.
Now if i create any Customer or Product in R/3 they were replicating to CRM(Delta load), but this delta load is not working in CRM to R/3 direction.
In CRM Administration console( Transaction code - SMOEAC) R/3 site was maintained and subscribed for Publications - All Business Partners, All Business Transactions and All Business partner Relationships.
Can anybody help me out that why Delta load is not happening from CRM to R/3 Direction.
Thanks in advance
Nadh.

Hi Nadh,
for BPs check PIDE settings once agiain, i hope u ve already downloaded all mandatory obects for BP, because u already told that replication from r/3 to crm is ok, so check once again PIDE settings (CRM to R/3),
for Products u ve to manual upload only
for Products
This may be necessary because the data is required in the OLTP System for a number of logistical processes such as procurement, inventory management, billing, financial accounting, controlling.
cheers
Ranga

Depot Sales-Excise values are not flowing from J1iJ to VF01

Hi Gurus,
In Depot Sales: while doing excise invoive from T-code J1iJ Go to delivery -RG23D selection select the delivery number XXXXX Excise Group 51 and series Group: 50 ENTER - select the line item and click on F6 and here we have to click on excise invoice Button for capturing the Input excise duties for taking the reference. And the excise values are shown here correctly.
Issue: In VF01- when we are raising the commercial invoice , the duty values are not flowing from the J1IJ transaction. Instead the values are showing Zero for all the three condition types namely JEXP, JECS and JHCS. We have used the Pricing Procedure ZINDEP and 356 routine.
Inputs on this how to solve will be highly appreciated.. as we are in critical stage.
What are the checks to be ensured to Get the values flow from J1IJ to VF01.
Scenario: STO from Mfrg Plant to Depot and Depot sales to customer.
Me21N-Me29N-VL10B-VL02N-VF01-J1IIn-MIGO-(STO process completes)-VA01-VL01N-J1IJ-VF01(duty values should flow from the J1IJ referenced Excise Invoice) Correct me if I am wrong.
Any user exits, Notes please let me know. I could not find any. I have gone through the forum threads, which speaks about 356 routine, J1ID- checks etc.
Thanks&Regards
Sreekanth:

Hi!
Am sure you would have captured the Excise at Depot with J1IG.
Also, have you saved the billing document to check the duties?
Thirdly, after save, again open the billing doc and go to Header-Conditions then Save. This part does not seems logical, but i am sharing my practical experience.
Please check condition records if any.
Regards
Arun

Excise Duty Value not flow from J1IJ to VF01

Hi SAP Expert,
I am facing the problem in Invoice to Customer(from Depot). Excise Values are not flowing from J1IJ for pricing procedure JINDEP. I maintained Alt Cal type as 356 in Pricing procedure JINDEP for Excise condition types JEXP. But it is still not flowing. I am using Tax Procedure TAXINN.
Do I need to go to VTFL In item level copying requirement to set pricing type: to C ??
But once i set, it will impact other billing document too. Please advise.
Thanks.

Hi,
I have successfully posted Excise Invoice at Depot using J1iJ.
When i create billing via Vf01, i am unable to see the value of Excise Duty in item pricing condition from J1iJ.
I analyse the pricing condition for condition type JEXP, below is what i got :
This message tells you that the condition record exists, but has not been set in the document. If pricing was carried out again for the document item, then the condition would be set.
There are different reasons for this:
1.The condition was deleted manually in the item condition screen.
2. The condition record was created later. Please note that order processing and pricing have buffer mechanisms. This means that a newly added condition record might only be found after order processing has been left completely and then started again.
If the condition type is used for subsequent settlement (rebate), there may be subsequent updating of business volume (the agreement is is created retrospectively). The document conditions do not contain the condition record, as the condition record was not created when pricing was carried out. Updating of business volume is carried out using special functions for subsequent settlement.
1. When an item was added, the condition record was accessed with key fields other than change time. This could lead to different results in the requirements check at the time of adding and the change time. This can occur when modifications are made.
2. In billing (or when copying orders): Certain condition types were not determined in the source document (this is usually controlled by the pricing requirements). When creating the document, the document flow (TVCPF,TVCPA) is processed using a pricing type that does not redetermine these condition types, although they are supposed to be called via the requirements.
Is it correct that i assigned routine 356 to Pricing Condition JINDEP ?

Extraction of document flow from CRM

Hi experts,
I am currently struggeling with a generic extractor that will load the document flow from CRM into BW. My problem is that the load takes too long, due to the number of links in the document flow. I use a SAP FM called SREL_GET_NEXT_RELATIONS to get the document links and it works fine. The problem occurs when a campaign is linked to a transaction, since the campaign at my client can have more than 10 000 transactions and those transactions is then linked to other transactions and so on. This makes extraction of the document flow very large and slow to load.
Is there any standard way of extracting the document flow that I am missing?
Does anyone have any experience regarding extracting the document flow from CRM and would like to share their knowledge?
Help are appreciated!
/Sebastian

there's a reason why SAP does not deliver extractors for things like this
sometimes you need to face the end users (or project managers) with the "impact" of their requests... who would ever be able to look at a document flow that contains 50 transactions each of which linked to 1000 (or more) campaigns again each of which linked to a couple of other transactions?
anyways, you should talk to some very experienced ABAPers if you really wish to continue with this request, rethink your approach or, what I would strongly suggest, rethink your initial request to get this into BI (if your not using web reporting, reporting on this will already crash in Excel versions 2003 and lower)

Data Flow from CRM to BW

Dear SAP Experts,
Greetings for the Day!
I am looking forward for some information on the Data flow happening from CRM to BW system. Some of the few queries are as below:
Do we have any settings for this data flow in Transaction SMOEAC.
How does the below setting impact the BDOC flow in BW. Also, if we un-check the “Do Not Snd”, will BDOCs
flow to BW system ? <PFA>
PS: We are on CRM 7.0 with EHP2.
Thanks!
Regards,
Kanika

Hi Kanika,
Data flow from CRM to BW happens via XIF using IDocs. You can check in transaction WE21 for your RFC destination of BW and the output parameters, which decides what data would be send to the corresponding destination.
You can also check my blog:
External Interface (XIF) Setup but this is XIF setup in general and not specific to BW.
Hope this helps.
Best Regards,
Shanthala.

Excise Values are not flowing from J1IJ to VF01

Hi All,
I am facing the problem in Invoice to Customer(from Depot). Excise Values are not flowing from J1IJ. I maintained Alt Cal type as 356 in Pricing procedure for Excise condition types. Even though its not flowing. I am using Tax Procedure TAXINN.
I have gone through SDN, everybody is suggesting about 356 routine.
My scenario is STO from Plant to Depot and Sale from Depot to Customer.
ME21N->VL10B->VF01(Proforma)->J1IIN->MIGO->VA01(from Depot)->VL01N->J1IJ(Depot Excise)->VF01(Invoice to Customer)
In J1IJ, excise values are coming but in VF01 it is not coming.
Kindly help me.
With Regards
Azeez.Mohd

Hi,
in j1ig initial screen which excise group/series group i need to enter
is it of supplying plant or depot --- Enter Your Excise group
If i enter material document no say 5000000265 (corresponds to migo-101 at depot )& year
it'm getting error message excise invoice already exists for5000000265 --> Check the Year of material document
You can also use the Excise Invoice Details tab
Enter Vendor's Ex.Inv.No. , enter your STO's Excise Invoice No. and Click on Own factory and enter factory's Series Group in n case of STO from factory,
use Depot Excise Invoice in case of transfer from another depot
and Excise Inv. Date
On next screen,
In case of non availability of Internal Excise No., select the line item and click on button. On next screen, enter Excise Inv. No., Date, Challan Qty, Excise Base value, ensure that Excise Duty rates are maintained in respective duty rates column, you can also manually enter the excise duty amount and press Enter . System will give warning messages, press Enter for each message and press Back button. System will display the excise duty amount, check the same and click on Save button.
Hope this will resolve your issue.
Regards,
Krishna O

Material delta changes are not flowing into CRM

Dear All,
material delta changes are not flowing into CRM, because the product hierarchy on material has been changed to a new product hierarchy. I do not want to download again the object DNL_CUST_PROD1 because it maight cause inconstancies in CRM. (I have already defined some z product hierarchies in CRM)
Do I need to create the new product hierarchy also in CRM manually?
Appreciate any inputs
Raj

Hi Raj,
Use the transacrion R3AR2 to create a z object for DNL_CUST_PROD1 and assign DNL_CUST_PROD1 as the object name
Then in request detail screen for new z object enter the details like table name (T179 in your case) and the name of the product hierarchy that you want to bring in. Save the transaction
Then use the transaction R3AR4 to initiate the download for your new z object as you normally do in R3AS.
Then go to SMW01 and reprosess the struck Bdoc.
Reward points if helps,
Regards,
Paul Kondaveeti

The delivery date should not flow from PR to PO.

Dear Gurus,
While creating a P.O with reference to PR.
The delivery date should not flow from PR to PO.
Any settings are there for this

there is no planning.
this is a utilites industry.
if there is any way to do.The delivery date should not flow from PR to PO.
please share ur ideas

Configuration is not replicated from CRM to ECC for configurable product

Hi,
We have some materials in the system for which the configuration is not replicated from CRM to ECC.
We create a quotation in CRM and configure it. In CRM, the configuration is complete and components are properly exploded but when we check the same quotation in ECC, configuration is incomplete with respect to some characteristics and product references.
Please find below finding
1. If the same material is created in another plant/company code, the configuration is replicated properly.
2. We have also checked that the BOM is completely maintained for plants for which configuration is replicated. But we dont think so it could be an issue since if we create the quotation in ECC instead of creating in CRM, for the plant (for which the configuration is not replicated from CRM to ECC), it is properly exploded and complete.
3. variant prices are replicated properly even though components are not replicated.
We need to know if we can explode the BOM in the configuration even though complete BOM for the particular plant is not maintained. If its not possible to explode, why it is possible for us to explode the BOM in the configuration in quotation.
Please advise.
Thx.

the configuration (variant configuration and not customization) that is done in CRM contract is not copied to ECC contract. Is it because that item category in CRM is activated for doing the BOM configuration and the same in ECC is not activated for doing the BOM configuration?
My question is that if item category in ECC is not activated for BOM configuration then is it like that the BOM configuration in CRM will not be copied to ECC?

Customizing not downloading from CRM to CDB

Dear All
Pl help/ guide on the direction to proceed further. Customizing (Domain Ranges DD Texts) are not downloading from CRM to CDB.
Background:
Activities and Campaigns are replicated from CRM to CDB (Mobile). For a particular new field which we have added through AET, the domain ranges are stored in the table DD07T. The task is do a customizing download to replicate these domain ranges to the corresponding CDB table SMODD07T. For this, We would need to create a BDoc type @ BDoc Modeler and then a customizing adapter object with that linked BDoc type. For distribution from CDB to mobile, we would have to create replication object and publication on this Linked BDoc in SMOEAC.
Issue
Now, when I am creating the Bdoc type in SBDM, it prompts that mapped table (SMODD07T) should have two key fields and only one Primary key for the segment and since this is not the case it is throwing the error. I have verified with various std customizing adapter objects and their corresponding sBDocs. In all the cases, the SMO table has exactly key fields, the MANDT client and the SFA GUID. Without generating the BDoc type, the adapter object Banega nahi and I experimented in many ways where I created a custom adapter object with any of the standard campaign and customizing related Linked BDoc types for the adapter object, Initial Load is successful and even huge blocks of data is transferred. But the required SMODD07T table is not getting populated.

Hi,
Ok the initial load is performed without errors.... But did you check the queues?
Best regards,
Caíque Escaler

Hello I have a problem in calculating the apple id Can you help me please I forgot answer security questions for your account How can knowledge Please help Please reply as soon as possible I can not buy from camels Store And the rest of the account ba

Hello
I have a problem in calculating the apple id Can you help me please
I forgot answer security questions for your account How can knowledge
Please help
Please reply as soon as possible
I can not buy from camels Store
And the rest of the account balance $25
Message was edited by: lingo azam

I think you mean App Store.
Rescue email address and how to reset Apple ID security questions

Message "not downloaded from server. You need to take this account online

After upgrading to 10.4.9, when I click on any of the old emails in my inbox I get the message "this message not downloaded from server. You need to take this account online in order to download it."
I can still read all email in any other mailbox.
I can read all email received after upgrading.
I appreciate any help.
G4 17 inch Mac OS X (10.4.9) 1 gb ram

You upgraded to 10.4.9 from what?
If you upgraded from Mac OS X 10.3 or earlier, the problem is that the conversion from Mail 1.x to Mail 2.x is broken. Take a look at the following thread to better understand the problem:
Help! "You need to take this account online in order to download it."
More specifically, if this is a POP account, the following procedure should allow you to fix the Inbox problem. A similar procedure should allow you to fix other mailboxes that might also be affected:
1. Quit Mail if it’s running.
2. Make a backup copy of the ~/Library/Mail folder, just in case something goes wrong while trying to fix the problem. You can do this in the Finder by dragging the folder to the Desktop while holding the Option (Alt) key down, for example. This is where all your mail is stored.
3. Create a new folder on the Desktop and name it however you wish (e.g. Inbox Old). It doesn’t need to have an .mbox extension.
4. In the Finder, go to ~/Library/Mail/POP-username@mailserver/INBOX.mbox/.
5. Move the files mbox and Incoming_Mail out of INBOX.mbox, into the Inbox Old folder just created on the Desktop. These files contain all the messages that were in the mailbox before the upgrade to Tiger, and maybe even some messages that had been deleted. mbox is the most important. Incoming_Mail may or may not be present.
6. Move any strangely-named Messages-T0x... folders to the Desktop (not into the Inbox Old folder). These folders are to be deleted after fixing the problem. They are temporary folders created during an import or an indexing process, and Mail should have deleted them when done. Their presence is a clear indication that something didn’t work as expected. If you’ve been using Mail after the conversion and have already tried to fix the problem by rebuilding the mailbox or something like that, they might contain messages that are neither in Messages proper nor in the mbox file, so keep them around until the problem is fixed.
7. Move everything else within INBOX.mbox, except the Messages folder, to the Trash.
The result of the above should be that INBOX.mbox contains the proper Messages folder only, and the Inbox Old folder on the Desktop contains the mbox and Incoming_Mail (if it exists) files only. Now, proceed as follows:
8. Open Mail.
9. The account’s Inbox should properly display in Mail as many messages as *.emlx files are in ~/Library/Mail/POP-username@mailserver/INBOX.mbox/Messages/. If that’s not the case, select the mailbox in Mail and do Mailbox > Rebuild.
10. In Mail, do File > Import Mailboxes, choose Other as the data format, and follow the instructions to import the Inbox Old folder that’s on the Desktop.
As a result of doing the above, some messages may be duplicated now. Andreas Amann’s Mail Scripts has a Remove Duplicates script that you may find useful.
Do with the imported mail whatever you wish. You may move the messages anywhere you want and get rid of the imported mailboxes afterwards.
If all is well and you don’t miss anything, the files on the Desktop can be deleted, although you may want to keep them for a while, just in case.
Take a look at the following article (also referenced in the thread I mentioned at the beginning of this post) to learn what you might have done before upgrading to minimize the risk of this happening, and what you may do after fixing the problem to avoid similar issues from happening in the future. DON’T do now what the article suggests, though, as that would make things worse in the current situation:
Overstuffed mailbox is unexpectedly empty
Ask for any clarifications or if you need further assistance.
Note: For those not familiarized with the ~/ notation, it refers to the user’s home folder, i.e. ~/Library is the Library folder within the user’s home folder.

Problem with Billing Engine after upgrade from CRM 5.0 to CRM 7.0

Hello together,
The system of our customer has been upgraded from CRM 5.0 to CRM 7.0. After that some problems occurred regarded the billing.
In the Billing Due List a dump occurs when clicking on an item and then on conditions
Dump message: No function module can be found named "/1BEA/CRMB_DL_PAR_O_DERIVE" however.
(Other classes are new generated after the upgrade)
During the Analysis we looked to the billing engine navigator:
In the Billing Engine Navigator (Transaction: BEFN_F1) the Generation Log shows the following:
We have re-generated the Object PAR in CRMB->DL->Feature->PAR. But this shows the above displayed error message. How can we add value to the Placeholder?
Another question is which impacts does it have if we regenerate the complete billing engine for CRMB with transaction BEA_CONFIG_F1 (Configure Application)?
BR, Anne

Hi Nawanit,
we checked the key figure settings and categories. Everything is maintained correctly.
Since we work with MRP areas we also checked the "Global Parameters and Default Values for MRP Areas" in APO Customizing: The "Default values for Stock Transfer Documents" is set to "1" = Stock Transport Requisitions for MRP Areas.
BUT: When I try ot change this indicator I get the following message no. /SAPAPO/MRPA000:
"Process. w. stock transp. requisitions is not supported in standard sys. The process with stock transport requisitions will be supported as of SAP R/3 Enterprise Core Release 4.70 with SAP R/3 Enterprise Extension Set 2.0. ".
As far as we work with ECC 6.0, EHP4 this message makes no sense.
Does anyone have another idea?
Thanks
Jan

Billing is not flowing from CRM to R/3(in Lease asset accounting)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for