Billing Unit not Determined

Hi ,
I am configuring CRM billing for Service Senario in CRM 2007.After Creating and Releasing the Service order Confirmation and releasing the Billing due ltems, Billling Documents are not generated.
In the Transaction /BEA/CRMB04 "Analyze Incomplete Entries of Billing Due list" it shows the Service Confirmation document with Warning "Bill_Unit" not determined. I have cross checked the enteries in IMG under "Assign Billing Units to Sales Organizations" and "Assign Billing Units to Sales Organizations" But billing Unit are maintained there Properly.
Is there any other Setting to maitain for Billing Unit or Other Relevant Setting Required
Regards,

Hi,
In our case, we have problem in determination of Billing_Unit.
Since we have 2 organisation unit defined for Service as well as for sales scenario.
During the organisation determination for Service Confirmation it was
determining the Sales org for the service senario.
Regards,

Similar Messages

How to Mapping of company code to the billing units

Hi,
Please help me how to Mapping of company code to the billing units , iam doing the rollout project.
Thanks
Mustafa

Hi Mustafa,
External billing (A): Billing is controlled in the R/3 System.
The company code is determined by the accounting adapter which calls
the R3 system. You define the company code to be transferred in
Customizing under:
Customer Relationship Management
Master Data
Organizational Management
Cross-System Assignment of Organizational Units
Assign Company Codes and Business Places to Billing Units or
Assign Company Codes to Billing Units.
Also you can check attached note 717476 for further information.
Cheers,
Brian.

Billing doc not flown to A/C

Hi,
One billing doc.not flown to A/C,trying to release it manually but showing error -
"Error in account determination: table T030K key 1000 JN7 A2."
Kindly help to resolve this issue.
Harsh

Hi
Kindly maintain the tax code in FTXP and relevant G/L account for the same
Go to FTXP enter the country & tax code after that select the tax accounts and maintain the same as below
KTOPL KTOSL MWSKZ KONTS KONTH
Chart of account Account key tax code G/l account
REgards
Damu
Edited by: Damodhar Reddy Chilukuri on Jan 18, 2010 5:42 AM

Revenue Recignition Error message - Accrual period not determined fot item

I a creating a credit memo with refrence to billing document. Revenue Recognition type is D. I am getting error message while releasing invoice to accounting "Accrual Period not determined for invoice" Message no. VFRR007
Any help would be appreciated

Dear Pankaj,
I am facing the same problem.
Scenario is similar to yours. There is no contract but a sales order.
Could you please inform how this error got resolved?
Thanks in advance.
Piyush

Field FKSTA- Billing status of delivery-related billing documents not getting updated

Hi Experts,
I have a requirement wherein I need to fetch the FKSTA - Billing status of delivery-related billing documents into the datasource 2lis_11_VASTI. I have checked a lot of threads on this topic but have not found a concrete solution yet.
I have checked the settings in vov7 and vov8 and everything seems to be in place. I have also checked in table VBUP, when I filter based on field FKSTA = 'C', it shows me the outbound delivery document nos. But when I use the related sales document, it shows me blank values. VBUK as well doesn't show any values for field FKSTK.
I would like to know how and where I can identify the 'billing status of delivery- related' document.
I can see in VBUP table that if I enter the sales document no. related to the delivery document, it does not show the correct status. I believe that the statuses should ideally get updated to the underlying VBUK and VBUP tables. Is there any way to update and align them?
Is there a workaround, a similar field that i can use for datasource enhancement that will give me the correct values?
Appreciate any help I can get on this as it is urgent.
Thanks,
AM

Hi,
You are correct that stauts is updated in table VBUK and VBUP.
However, a sales order does not determine a billing status for delivery related billing, field
VBUP-FKSTA is only determined for delivey.
So, it is correct behavior that VBUP-FKSTA = BLANK when searching VBUP with
VBUP-VBELN = sales order number.
Just because of above reason, you will not find billing status field in VA03 -> goto header/item;
you could only find billing status field for delivery in VL03N -> status overview.
It seems that you are trying to find out sales orders that have been fully deliveried and fully billed, am I right? As far as I know, there is no directly table/field/tcode that could meet your requirement.
You could consider following workaround:
firstly, get a list of deliveries that have been fully billied(search VBUP with VBUP-FKSTA = C or search VBUK with VBUK-FKSTK = C);
Secondly, using these deliveries to search table VBFA to find out related sales orders.
Hope this helps.
Best regards,
Crystal

Creating Billing Unit in CRM V1.2007 Best Practices C05

Hi,
in C05 (Org Model with HR Integration) for Best Practices V1.2007 I have to create a Billing Unit.
That means, I have to create a Corporate Account.
For Creation of the Corporate Account i need a Number Range and a Grouping.
My Question:
Maintaining Number Range and Grouping for Business Partners is described in C03.
In the Solution Builder C03 comes after C05.
So I have first to finish C03 manually via SPRO or at least I have to maintain a Number Range and a Grouping so that I´m able to create the Billing Unit as an Corporate Account and then proceed with C05?
Regards
Andreas

Hi Padma,
We are facing the same issue while installing Baseline Best practices.
"Transport numbers not fullfill the requirement"
We are trying to activate full solution.
I have already created a new work bench and customize request ,but stills its gvg "Transport numbers not fullfill the requirement".
Iam not able to find a solution for this on service market place.
Thanks & Regards,

Billing document not relenvent for invoice list

Dear forum members,
For one sales area I can create a invoice list from a billing document, but not for the other.In debug mode first one is relevent for invoice list processing ( VBUK-RELIK), but for another sales area ,thus staus is not relevent.
Partner detemrination was different for both the above sales area.This was the only differnce. Partner determination is correct in both.What can be the other possible reasons for the status NOT RELEVENT for invoice list.
Best Regards,
Kanwal

Dear Goyal,
-->Check the configuration settings if you are using diffirent Invoice documents in two sales areas.
IMG Path is SPRO>Sales and Distribution>Billing>Billing documents>Invoice lists.
-->Check the data in the customer master in the transaction VD02.
Go to Sales area data tab-->Billing document here you check whether you are maintaining the Invoice list dates or not.
-->Check the Partner determination procedure assignment to the Invoice List type at Header level and item level.
Because you are mentioned that partner dtermination wad different.
Header assignment path.
IMG>SPRO>Sales and Distribution->Basic functions>partner determination>set up partner determination.>Set up partner determination for billing header-->Prtner determination procedure assignment.
Item assignment path
IMG>SPRO>Sales and Distribution->Basic functions>partner determination>set up partner determination.>Set up partner determination for billing item -->Prtner determination procedure assignment.
I hope it will help you
Regards,
Murali.

Billing Document not generated.....

Hi Gurus,
When i am creating a Billing Document VF01....after completion of VL01n...the system shows an error Billing Document not generated...
Please help me
Rewards will be given

To resolve the error, you can analyze account determination in the billing document. Process:
Goto T.Code: VF02 & Enter Invoice number
Next (On the top most strip) goto Environment
Next (Select Environment) go to Account determination
Next (In Account Determination) select Revenue Account Determination (first option)
This will list all the condition types in the Billing document & analyze each condition & check for which G/L accounts is not determined.
Possible errors:
1. VKOA not maintained for required combination
Solution: Maintain the combination in VKOA.
2. Account Assignment of Customer / material not maintained in Customer / Material Master (If maintained in combination in VKOA).
Solution:
Option 1 (Standard solution):
step 1: Cancel Billing Document --> Reverse PGI --> cancel Delivery --> Cancel Sales Order
step 2: Maintain Customer master / Material Master correctly.
step 3: Recreate sales Order --> Delivery --> PGI --> Invoicing.
Option 2:
Force the Account Assignment Group of Customer / Material through Debug in change mode of Billing document, which will release Billing Document to Accounting.
3. Account Key not maintained in Pricing Procedure:
Impact: This may create accounting document, but if condition type, which are to be posted to account, but do not have account key maintained in pricing procedure, it will not be post the relevant condition type to G/L account.
From FI Side, you require to check that all the G/L account has been maintained through T.Code: FS00. G/L account being Master data has to be created in each client ot uploaded through LSMW / SCATT / BDC.
In Billing Document in change mode (in the first screen where we enter Billing Document number), on the top most left hand corner, take a dropdown on Billing Document & select Release to accounting. Here you can get the under mentioned possible message:
1. G/L account not found
2. Cost Element not maintained for G/L account.
In both the above cases, FI consultant requires to take corrective action.
Regards,
Rajesh Banka
Reward suitable points.
How to give points: Mark your thread as a question while creating it. In the answers you get, you can assign the points by clicking on the stars to the left. You also get a point yourself for rewarding (one per thread).

Output type not determined during background Job

Hi Experts,
we have scheduled a Job to create Billing. In few of the billing documents, output type is not getting determined. Condition records are maintained correctly. This is happening only for few billing documents in spite of maintaining condition records?
Can some one help me on this issue.

shravan,
added: How do users come to know that in few documents output is not getting determined?
To check determination of output record - In VF02, give the billing document for which output was not determined.
Goto > Header > Output, check if the output has got determined.
If not then it is not getting determined.
any difference between the documents in which output is getting determined and in which not?
TW
Message was edited by: TW Typewriter

Third party billing document ,''account determination error ''

hi,
i got problem, After creating the billing document, account determination error is coming.
Please help,
thanks

Hi,
Go to OB40 and assign you account to your combination if its not there.
It should be assigned to your chart of account number and sales organization.
Just do these setting and go to VF02 and press the green flag after giving you billing document number.
If everything is right then accounting document will be generated.
Otherwise some error will pop out then post that error over here.
Regards
Raj.

Pric proc not determine

Hi,
We have access sequence i.e."ZP00" for basic price and under this 10 access table
is assigned but in delivery only 6 table are coming by seeing the analyze pricing
in delivery.(i.e. i have assigned with step nos 5,10,15,18,20,30,40,60,50,70
but step nos 10,15,18 and 20 is not determining in delivery).
plz advice what is required to be done to determine all the access tables.
regards
SP Shukla.

Dear Shukla,
Go to V/07 transaction slect your access sequence then go in to the details of the accesses then fields here you check the all the table fields got activated or not if not you need to activate all the fields.
Make sure that data is flowing in the delivery and billing related to the all table fields.
Also check is there exclusion maintained for those tables!
I hope this will help you,
Regards,
Murali.

CATS - CAT2 - Unit not permitted

SORRY I POSTED TWICE THIS THREAD DUE TO AN ERROR.
Hi experts,
We are using TCode CAT2 to confirm network activities work.
By default we have H (Hours) as unit. We would like to enter the work in minutes but if we change the units we always get the message "Unit not permitted".
What has to be done in order to be able to confirm the work in minutes?
Thanks
Edited by: mforman on Apr 27, 2011 1:07 PM

Hello,
CATS unit is determined using the field 'meinh'. Field meinh is been customized in table T006. CATS takes the first
time unit in the table T006 (field 'msehi') for which the value in the field 'ZAEHL' is '3600' (seconds in an hour) and field 'NENNR' is '1'. as transaction unit which will populate the field 'meinh' .
Best Regards,
Deepak..

APEX SSO and Load balancing: Could not determine workspace for application

We had a single HTTP Server serving APEX in a 10.2.0.2 database configured with SSO to be used by the developers. APEX has been registered as a partner application and the login url has been CA Siteminder protected so that the SM_USER details are forwarded in the header for the application to use for authorization. Everything is fine so far.
Now we have added a HTTP Server on another host and have it all set up for APEX and its pointing to the same database. APEX_ADMIN access works as normal, but applications previously using SSO now get the following error after entering the URL.
Expecting p_company or wwv_flow_company cookie to contain security group id of application owner.
Error ERR-7620 Could not determine workspace for application ().
Using HTTP Watch I find that the application is not even trying to redirect to the login page.
What is wrong here?

APEX has been registered as a partner application as described in
http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/database/application_express/howtos/sso_partner_app.html
In the meantime I found metalink document 368746.1 which describes the cause of this problem. Please read carefully what I wrote, it all works when the the new APEX web server is turned off in the server farm on the load balancer and directed through the original web server. When running regapp.sql the hostname in the listener token was using the virtual hostname. This works fine if the request comes from the original APEX server which proofs that there is nothing wrong with the installation and set up of SSO. When directing the request to the new APEX web server the APEX_ADMIN page still works only existing work spaces using SSO don't seems to work anymore resulting in a error as described in the subject.
As for metalink document 368746.1 naming the causes of this error:
- there are no duplicate entries in WWSEC_ENABLER_CONFIG_INFO$
-LISTENER_TOKEN clearly works for requests coming from the first web server
-theoretically the web server listener port could be changed from 7777, but port 80 needs to be maintained here as production is mimiced as far down as possible.
Is there some cache table which can be cleared? How is it that the flows schema (apex engine) can not find the work space when the request comes from a new web server which can however access the APEX_ADMIN pages.
anyone?

Billing document not cleared when processing Payment cards in Sales order

Hi,
I am having an issue with Payment card processing (credit card). We are using SAP R/3 4.7. When I use manual authorization, the status of billing document still shows "A" incomplete. The status shows authorization successful but not settled in billing document.The accounting document when billed shows not cleared.We are not using any interface for credit processing. The authorization check is done outside of the system manually. We are planning to use manual authorization for all such transactions. I am not sure if any specific config is to be done or am I misssing something.
Any inputs in this regard would highly be appreciated.
Thanks!
Sanjay

Hello Sanjay,
Please also check to see if the field VBAP-ABFOR is filled for the line item (This is the Form of payment guarantee). Without this field filled the billing does not know that the item will be covered by payment cards.
VBAP-ABGES (Guaranteed (factor between 0 and 1)) should also be filled with 1.
I hope this helps.
Best regards,
Ian Kehoe

Abort Could not determine a value for variable 0DAT from the authorizations

Hi All,
I encountered an error '/ Abort Could not determine a value for variable 0DAT from the authorizations\' when executing my query on a multiprovider in BW 3.5.
Can anyone help me in finding a solutionn to this issue.
Thanks,
Kartik.

Hi Kartik,
I am sorry as that note is for NW2004s. Please check if 0DAT variable installed from a business content? if not then I think thats the cause of the problem.
Hope this helps,
Bye...

Billing Unit not Determined

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for