Bind Load balancing problem..expert help required

Hi there.
My RV042 has 2 WAN connections. One is connected to a Public Internet (WAN1) and the DMZ/Internet to my VPN router (WAN2)
Behind the VPN router connected t my WAN2 is the finance servers at network 10.36.88.0
Both users local and those who connects using PPTP VPN clients can access resources in the LAN
My problem is that due the round robin of load balancing sometimes they cannot reach the finance server
I tried playing bind the HTTP port and creating some rules with no luck
We want our users to use the WAN1 for all the web pages except those behind the VPN
Is there a way i can make that if my users access my finance server they go trough the WAN2?
Could you please provide me some guidance? (Rules, binds. etc)
in thi case woul be
An access rule or bind that all the WEB traffic for 10.36.88.0 flows to WAN2.

If you type "show real" you will probably see the column for "Data In" rising. This column is all the way on the right side of the display. This indicates that the server has received requests that it has not responded to.
By default, the LD does not use the Data value to fail a server. So by default, the data threshold for all the real servers is "0". If you set it to a non-zero number, the LD will start to use it.
http://www/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/iaabu/localdir/ldv42/421guide/42ch05.htm#xtocid856528
localdirector(config)# data 192.168.1.1:0:0:tcp 30
Hope this helps,
Steve Hall
Cisco TAC

Similar Messages

SA520 Load Balancing Problems

Hi,
we've got an SA520 with activated Load Balancing for two ISP's on the two WAN ports. Both WAN ports are showing "WAN status UP".
The problem is, that every connection stalls after a few minutes (for example a download, a web radio live stream or an PPTP VPN connection). It seems that the load balancing is switching the lines permanently for all sessions, which doesn't make any sense. How can I configure an session based load balancing without binding protocols on a special WAN port?
Best Regards, Klaus

Hello Klaus,
Thank you so much for your inquiry.
It seems that the load balancing is switching the lines permanently for
all sessions, which doesn't make any sense.
With Load Balancing enabled, pacekts traverse through the gateway in a manner that has no initial regard to protocol assignment to a specific WAN port. After the SA learns the routes to destination networks, it uses the route that is best, usually the shortest. The router will automatically switch back and forth, literally balancing the load, based on packet amount, with no regard to protocols.
How can I configure an
session based load balancing without binding protocols on a special WAN
port?
That said, protocol binding is neccessary in order to direct the traffic, based on protocol assigment, in a specified manner. The nature of Load Balancing requires protocol binding in order to prevent a protocol, even HTTP, from jumping WAN ports. I hope this helps!

WebCache load balancing problem

I am having a problem with Web Cache distributing load to 4 origin servers. It turns out that one Origin server received 24 times less requests than another, despite the fact that they configured the same way.
here is my configuration of production site:
Radware load balancer ( LB) with cyclic algoritm received requests from users.
LB distrubuted request to 4 dedicated webcache servers running as a one clusted with the same number for capacity for each server.
This cluster in turn forward missed requests to 4 application servers (Oracle HTTP and OC4j running J2EE apps). Those 4 servers connected in 2 clusters with 2 servers each. Session failover is disabled.
The problem is that one server has 60 session and another only 1.
Here is some statistics I collected from WebCache admin pages:
Request served to origin servers:
     cache1     cache2     cache3     cache4     total
serv5     1095     704     1102     8206     11107
serv6     2190     9414     9829     3404     24837
serv7     58     481     465     92     1096
serv8     10113     1145     1102     934     13294
as you may see serv7 does not get his share of requests.
Does anybody experienced the same problem or have any idea where to look for answer?
thanks

Does your application require session binding?
You may want to contact Oracle Support to review your configuration setttings.

RV042 load balancing problem

We have two network connections coming into the office. One is a private WAN and the other is an internet WAN. We have a RV042 Router configured for load balancing. On Wan1 we have our private WAN which includes Exchange, and 6 VPNs. On WAN2 we have a Public IP, and workers from home. Both connections are 5Mg T1s and both have the ability to reach the internet but only wan2 has a public IP (76.x.x.x) were as WAN1 has a private IP. (10.x.x.x).
Now were the problem lies is our new web based Payroll system does not support load balancing. We have to shutdown one side when we want to do payroll (turn load balancing off.)
Now is there a way to make our payroll computers only use one side? modify host file maybe? Or force a certain MAC address to only use WAN1 OR is there a better router that can Accomplish this?
Any help would be appreciated
Peter Labelle

I ran in to this problem at a client where we had an RV042. Different scenario though. We had 2 static IP from 2 different ISP's. We had an accounting program that used HTTPS on port 443 hosted at a different location. We had to bind outgoing port 443 to WAN1 to prevent disconnect problems. This caused a problem in case that internet connection went down.
What we did was create a service on the RV042 for TCP port 4433 and binded the traffic to WAN2. On the side hosting the accounting package we created a rule in that router to translate all public port 4433 requests to internal 443 requests.
On the workstations we had to leave 2 desktop shortcuts one that pointed to 443 and one to 4433. That way if one link doesn't work they can just use the second link.
It's not the best solution but at least it works until they ok a swap out to a router that supports better binding.
I'm not provided this as a solution but maybe it can spark an idea of a workaround.
I know a company called Xincom use to make a dual wan router that was decently priced that supported strict binding per internal ip address. The build quality wasn't the best and they use to die all the time but maybe their new units are better. When they worked though they were very good and I never had a problem.

Session/jstl and load balancing - need expert advice

After user loggs in, I am getting locale from db and storing it inside userSession along with userLogin. Inside jsp using <fmt> tag to display locale based resource property.
HttpSession userSession = request.getSession(true);
userSession.setAttribute("UserLogin", oRS.getString("user_login"));
Config.set(userSession, Config.FMT_LOCALE, currentLocale);Also using filter after login page to check for User Session. Currently all working fine .
But if i want to make use of load balancing, whether still it will work?
1)I understand that if i depend on network config i.e. session request sticks to one server then i believe shld not be a problem
2)But if that is not the choice then what else ? Client want to make use of serialization technique. I do not know much about it, how to implement it, any sample is greatly appreciated.
3)what about jstl Config.set(..) whether any changes needed here?
4)Do i need to change filter code.
Pls pls help me, i really need expert advice on this.
regards
Manisha

1)If i want cluster server to replicate the session
then all attributes saved in the session have to be
serializable.yes.
2)In docs it is mentioned
Use setAttribute to Change Session State
In an HTTP servlet that implements
javax.servlet.http.HttpSession, use
HttpSession.setAttribute (which replaces the
deprecated putValue) to change attributes in a
session object. If you set attributes in a session
object with setAttribute, the object and its
attributes are replicated in a cluster using
in-memory replication. If you use other set methods
to change objects within a session, WebLogic Server
does not replicate those changes. Every time a change
is made to an object that is in the session,
setAttribute() should be called to update that object
across the cluster.
Whether it means that if I want to store a object
(which is serializable) e.g. 'String' inside session
and use setAttribute() method then I do not need to
make that object implicitly serializable?No, you still need the objects to be serializable.

Wgate Load Balancing Problem

Hi Folks,
We have ITS 6.20 Patch level 33 installed which connects to our R/3 system. We are trying to add multiple Agate servers (not multiple Agate processes) to one Wgate. We installed agates on two hosts, host1 and host2. We then installed wgate on host1 which we connected during the time of installation to agate on host2. It connected fine and we were able to get the webgui and also able to login to R/3 system. At that time we had problem in going to native ADM instance as we were getting http 500 error (we had re-installed ADM instance on both the hosts after the whole exercise of installating agate and wgate). Hoping that we can solve native ADM problem later, we added the the second agate which is on hosts1(the same host on which wgate is) by adding the entry for agate 2 in the wgate registry xml file.
<key name="Agates">
      <key name="Agate1">
       <value name="Host" type="text">host2</value>
       <value name="PortAGate" type="text">sapavw00_******</value>
       <value name="PortMManager" type="text">sapavwmm_******</value>
       <value name="Type" type="text">1</value>
       <value name="SncNameAGate" type="text"/>
       <value name="SncNameWGate" type="text"/>
       <value name="MultiProcess" type="text">no</value>
       <value name="Available" type="text">yes</value>
      </key>
      <key name="Agate2">
       <value name="Host" type="text">host1</value>
       <value name="PortAGate" type="text">sapavw00_******</value>
       <value name="PortMManager" type="text">sapavwmm_******</value>
       <value name="Type" type="text">1</value>
       <value name="SncNameAGate" type="text"/>
       <value name="SncNameWGate" type="text"/>
       <value name="MultiProcess" type="text">no</value>
       <value name="Available" type="text">yes</value>
      </key>
The second agate added fine and is doing load balancing as well as we can see requests getting routed to both the agate in the load balancing screen. However we are not able to access the global.srvc file under configuration->Performance->global services->All settings as we are getting the following message:
Error loading service file "global.srvc"!
Also when we go to services under configuration, we are getting a message "error accessing services directory!"
In default R/3 system also all the fields are empty although we had given the application server details while installing both the agates.
We are getting the below messages in diagnostics.log file:
2010-11-22T12:30:04.401 --- log opened -
A 2010-11-23T13:55:53.346 [agate,sapdiag ] 00, s00000000061DB140, CsRead returned rd=-100
2010-11-23T14:17:06.863 --- log closed -
2010-11-23T14:17:07.753 --- log opened -
A 2010-11-23T14:30:48.618 [agate,sapdiag ] 00, s00000000061DB220, Cannot handle request from login
A 2010-11-23T14:38:45.615 [agate,        ] 00, s0000000000000000, WorkDoGetReq: ContReceiveContainer() failed, rc=0xffffffff
A 2010-11-23T14:38:45.615 [agate,        ] 00, s0000000000000000, WorkDoWork: WorkDoGetReq() failed, rc=0xffffffff
A 2010-11-23T14:38:45.677 [agate,sapxgdk ] 00, s0000000000000000, ContSendContainer: FAILED, send length is 0
A 2010-11-23T14:38:50.958 [agate,        ] 00, s0000000000000000, WorkDoGetReq: ContReceiveContainer() failed, rc=0xffffffff
A 2010-11-23T14:38:50.958 [agate,        ] 00, s0000000000000000, WorkDoWork: WorkDoGetReq() failed, rc=0xffffffff
A 2010-11-23T14:38:50.974 [agate,sapxgdk ] 00, s0000000000000000, ContSendContainer: FAILED, send length is 0
Please let me know if this procedure of adding the agate was wrong or there are some parameter settings that we may have missed. Would it have been better to go for a single host wgate+agate installation on host1 and then add agate2 on host2?

Hi Edgar,
Thanks for the reply. I had re-installed ADM instance on both the hosts after the whole exercise of installing agate and wgate.
Anyways, Now we have uninstalled the earlier instances on both hosts and installed wgate+agate on host1 as a single host installation and agate2 on host2. Then we added agate2 to wgate1 and load balancing is working fine. Now the issue of not being able to access the service file and directories, etc has also been resolved. The only problem that remains is that we are not able to go into the native ADM. We get a http 500 error, although the redirect URL is correct. Is the any additional setting required for that to happen?

ACE Load Balancing Problem

Hi,
I have ACE 4701 with c4710ace-mz.A3_2_2.bin image. In the current setup ACE is located in the center of network where all the WAN, Intenret and LAN is connected and ACE has default towards Internet and All other segment has default route towards ACE appliance. ACe is only redirecting the port 80 traffic to my Proxy server and bypass my lan subnet on port 80.
Internet
i
i
i
i
i
ACE--------------------------------WAN
i
i
i
i
LAN
I want to use ACE for the load balancing of two servers. Today I did the load balancing configuration but as soon as I applied the policy map on the interface vlan 200 and 300, my complete network reachability went down. When I remove the policy my network came back to normal.
192.168.200.66 FAX Server-1
192.1168.200.67 FAX Server-2
192.168.200.65   Virtual IP address
Attached is the configuration that I did on ACE for the load balancing and below is the current configuration of the ACE appliance.
access-list acl-in remark ACCESS LIST FOR ACE-INSIDE
access-list acl-in line 1 extended permit ip any any
access-list acl-out remark ACCESS LIST FOR ACE-OUTSIDE
access-list acl-out line 1 extended permit ip any any
access-list acl-proxy remark ACCESS LIST FOR PROXY SEGMENT
access-list acl-proxy line 1 extended permit ip any any
access-list acl-wan remark ACCESS LIST FOR WAN SEGMENT
access-list acl-wan line 1 extended permit ip any any
probe tcp PROBE_5050
port 5050
interval 15
passdetect interval 60
open 1
probe tcp PROBE_5101
port 5101
interval 15
passdetect interval 60
open 1
probe tcp PROBE_TCP
port 80
interval 15
passdetect interval 60
open 1
parameter-map type http PARAMAP_CASE
case-insensitive
no persistence-rebalance
rserver host RS_BCPR01
ip address 192.168.0.103
inservice
rserver host RS_BCPR02
ip address 192.168.0.104
inservice
rserver host RT_fax1
description Right Fax Server-1
ip address 192.168.200.66
rserver host RT_fax2
description Right Fax Server-2
ip address 192.168.200.67
serverfarm host SF_BCPR
transparent
probe PROBE_5050
probe PROBE_5101
probe PROBE_TCP
rserver RS_BCPR01
inservice
rserver RS_BCPR02
inservice
serverfarm host SF_RT_fax
rserver RT_fax1
rserver RT_fax2
sticky ip-netmask 255.255.255.255 address source STICKY-SOURCE
replicate sticky
serverfarm SF_BCPR
sticky ip-netmask 255.255.255.255 address source FAX-STICKY
replicate sticky
serverfarm SF_RT_fax
class-map type management match-any CM_ALL
2 match protocol snmp any
3 match protocol http any
4 match protocol https any
5 match protocol icmp any
6 match protocol telnet any
class-map match-any CM_BYPASS_FOR_LAN
3 match virtual-address 100.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 tcp eq www
8 match virtual-address 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 tcp eq www
9 match virtual-address 172.16.0.0 255.255.0.0 tcp eq www
10 match virtual-address 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0 tcp eq www
class-map match-any CM_BYPASS_SUBNET
9 match virtual-address 100.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 tcp eq www
13 match virtual-address 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 tcp eq www
14 match virtual-address 172.16.0.0 255.255.0.0 tcp eq www
15 match virtual-address 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0 tcp eq www
class-map match-any CM_IM
2 match virtual-address 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 tcp eq 5050
3 match virtual-address 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 tcp eq 1080
4 match virtual-address 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 tcp eq 5101
class-map match-all CM_SF_BCPR
255 match virtual-address 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 tcp eq www
class-map match-any RT_FAX
2 match virtual-address 192.168.200.65 0.0.0.0 any
policy-map type management first-match PM_ALL
class CM_ALL
permit
policy-map type loadbalance http first-match PM_L7_BYPASS_FOR_LAN_HTTP
class class-default
forward
policy-map type loadbalance http first-match PM_L7_BYPASS_HTTP
class class-default
forward
policy-map type loadbalance first-match PM_LB_RT_FAX
class class-default
sticky-serverfarm FAX-STICKY
policy-map type loadbalance http first-match PM_LB_SF_BCPROXY
class class-default
sticky-serverfarm STICKY-SOURCE
policy-map multi-match PM_BYPASS_FOR_LAN_HTTP
class CM_BYPASS_FOR_LAN
loadbalance vip inservice
loadbalance policy PM_L7_BYPASS_FOR_LAN_HTTP
policy-map multi-match PM_BYPASS_HTTP
class CM_BYPASS_SUBNET
loadbalance vip inservice
loadbalance policy PM_L7_BYPASS_HTTP
policy-map multi-match PM_MAIN_BCPROXY
class CM_SF_BCPR
loadbalance vip inservice
loadbalance policy PM_LB_SF_BCPROXY
loadbalance vip icmp-reply active
appl-parameter http advanced-options PARAMAP_CASE
class CM_IM
loadbalance vip inservice
loadbalance policy PM_LB_SF_BCPROXY
policy-map multi-match PM_RT_FAX
class RT_FAX
loadbalance vip inservice
loadbalance policy PM_LB_RT_FAX
service-policy input PM_ALL
interface vlan 100
description FW-INSIDE CONTEXT RACK1
ip address 192.168.0.5 255.255.255.224
alias 192.168.0.11 255.255.255.224
peer ip address 192.168.0.6 255.255.255.224
mac-address autogenerate
no icmp-guard
access-group input acl-out
no shutdown
interface vlan 200
description WAN-VLAN CONTEXT RACK1
ip address 192.168.0.33 255.255.255.224
alias 192.168.0.43 255.255.255.224
peer ip address 192.168.0.34 255.255.255.224
mac-address autogenerate
access-group input acl-wan
service-policy input PM_BYPASS_HTTP
service-policy input PM_MAIN_BCPROXY
no shutdown
interface vlan 300
description ACE-INSIDE CONTEXT RACK1
ip address 192.168.0.65 255.255.255.224
alias 192.168.0.73 255.255.255.224
peer ip address 192.168.0.66 255.255.255.224
mac-address autogenerate
access-group input acl-in
service-policy input PM_BYPASS_FOR_LAN_HTTP
service-policy input PM_BYPASS_HTTP
service-policy input PM_MAIN_BCPROXY
no shutdown
interface vlan 301
description BC-VLAN CONTEXT RACK1
ip address 192.168.0.97 255.255.255.224
alias 192.168.0.107 255.255.255.224
peer ip address 192.168.0.98 255.255.255.224
mac-address autogenerate
access-group input acl-proxy
no shutdown
ft track interface TRACKING_FOR_FT_VLAN
track-interface vlan 300
peer track-interface vlan 300
priority 255
peer priority 255
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.1
Please help me out what i am missing. Is there any limitation on policy map or my bypass subnet list is creating problem.

I did these changes this time nothing disconnected but I am not able to do the Remote desktop on the virtual IP address. Real IP has Remote desktop enabled even VIP is not ping able for me.
rserver host RT_fax1
description Right Fax Server-1
ip address 192.168.200.66
inservice
rserver host RT_fax2
description Right Fax Server-2
ip address 192.168.200.67
inservice
serverfarm host SF_RT_fax
rserver RT_fax1
    inservice
rserver RT_fax2
    inservice
policy-map type loadbalance rdp first-match PM_LB_RT_FAX
class class-default
    serverfarm SF_RT_fax
policy-map multi-match PM_RT_FAX
class RT_FAX
    loadbalance vip inservice
    loadbalance policy PM_LB_RT_FAX
    loadbalance vip icmp-reply active
interface vlan 200
description WAN-VLAN CONTEXT RACK1
ip address 192.168.0.33 255.255.255.224
alias 192.168.0.43 255.255.255.224
peer ip address 192.168.0.34 255.255.255.224
mac-address autogenerate
access-group input acl-wan
service-policy input PM_BYPASS_HTTP
service-policy input PM_MAIN_BCPROXY
service-policy input PM_RT_FAX
no shutdown
interface vlan 300
description ACE-INSIDE CONTEXT RACK1
ip address 192.168.0.65 255.255.255.224
alias 192.168.0.73 255.255.255.224
peer ip address 192.168.0.66 255.255.255.224
mac-address autogenerate
access-group input acl-in
service-policy input PM_BYPASS_FOR_LAN_HTTP
service-policy input PM_BYPASS_HTTP
service-policy input PM_MAIN_BCPROXY
service-policy input PM_RT_FAX
no shutdown
But nothing is working for me. Please help me out. This time i didnt configure the sticky. But in real I will go with sticky and complete IP protocol will be use a VIP. Please help me out.

CSS load balancing problem

Hi,
I have two CSS that I use to load balance RDP connections to two WTS servers. I dont have switch behind CSS so they are connected back-to-back via cable. All server facing ports (including back-to-back ports) are in the same VLAN.
CSS1 is primary for the VIP address and for redundant interface address, and CSS2 is standby.
So, when I connect WTS-1 to CSS-1 and WTS-2 to CSS-2, CSS1 sees both services as active and everything seems fine. If WTS-2 is disconnected, WTS2 service on CSS1 is down etc.
In sticky table, I can see that CSS1 is load balancing request to both servers, but the problem is that only RDP connections to WTS-1(server directly connected to CSS1) work fine , and connections that are load balanced to WTS-2 are dropped??? Direct RDP connection to WTS-2 IP works fine.
If I connect WTS-2 to CSS1, so both WTS servers are connected to CSS1 everything works fine.
Can anyone tell what can be wrong?
Configurations are in the attachment.
Thanks for help.
Regards,
Branimir

try the command 'ip uncond' on both CSS.
It will guarantees that the response from WTS-2 comes back to CSS1.
Gilles.

LocalDirector load balancing problem

I'm load balancing between 3 servers each running a web server via a single virtual address.
The problem I'm experiencing is one of the servers, whilst it still listens on port 80, stops serving content. When this happens, the LocalDirector doesn't appear to notice that there is a problem, and over a relatively short time, seems to divert the majority of traffic to this faulty web server as I use leastconns to balance the connection type.
Can you confirm that this is appropriate behaviour? I'm going to change it so I use roundrobin instead of leastconns which will (although not solve the problem) help lessen the impact, , but confirmation that is expected behaviour would help me sleep a little better!
Perhaps there is a more suitable Cisco product to circumvent this issue?

If you type "show real" you will probably see the column for "Data In" rising. This column is all the way on the right side of the display. This indicates that the server has received requests that it has not responded to.
By default, the LD does not use the Data value to fail a server. So by default, the data threshold for all the real servers is "0". If you set it to a non-zero number, the LD will start to use it.
http://www/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/iaabu/localdir/ldv42/421guide/42ch05.htm#xtocid856528
localdirector(config)# data 192.168.1.1:0:0:tcp 30
Hope this helps,
Steve Hall
Cisco TAC

Load balancing problem

We need a load balancing setup that share the load for many web applications on multiple backend servers, but we don’t want the web apps to be activated on all backend servers at the same time. We want to configure all apps as “lazy” on all backend servers. They will then be activated when the first request to their DNS is made. Then the app is started on that backend server.
We have hundreds of apps and each backend server will become very slow if all apps are activated on all backend servers. The preferred solution would therefore be to not call all DNS names on all backend servers but to share the balance based on the DNS name in the requests. Sticky-session or sticky source-IP won’t be enough to solve this as they only stick to each user session.
If User-A request www.siteA.com he may be redirected to backend server 1 and then be kept there. But if User-B then requests the same www.siteA.com he may be redirected to backend server 2 and then be kept there. This means that the web application for siteA will be activated and loaded in both the backend servers. When we host hundreds of sites this will be a problem. We may have hundreds of backend servers but they will all end up loading all web apps over time and get out of memory.
The theory to get this work is a load balancer with the following logic:
1.     A request for a certain DNS comes in. For example: www.siteA.com
2.     Load balancer checks if this certain DNS has been redirected to a certain backend server before and if this server is alive
2.1.     (If not redirected before): Redirect the request to the backend server with least load. Store the selected backend route based on the DNS name.
2.2.     (If redirected before): Redirect the request to the assigned backend server for siteA.
3.     If a backend server is down then all DNS requests to this server will be redirected to another backend server with least load. All requests to these DNS names will be assigned to this backend server instead.
h3. Example of set up
Many DNS to one IP
192.168.1.1 www.siteA.com
192.168.1.1 www.siteB.com
192.168.1.1 www.siteC.com
Frontend load balancer
192.168.1.1 (load balancer)
Backend app servers
192.168.2.2 (App server 1)
192.168.2.3 (App server 2)
192.168.2.4 (App server 3)
h3. Snapshot of servers during load
App server 1
www.siteA.com (Activated)
www.siteB.com (Lazy)
www.siteC.com (Lazy)
App server 2
www.siteA.com (Lazy)
www.siteB.com (Activated)
www.siteC.com (Lazy)
App server 3
www.siteA.com (Lazy)
www.siteB.com (Lazy)
www.siteC.com (Activated)

Only from load balancing point of view cluster is not really needed.
apart from session replication and failover capabilities, few more benefits are there with clustering only if you are using a web server also.
Stuck threads can be due to lot's of problems like application issues, load issues etc, So first make sure you are getting stuck thread on both servers or only on one, if on one, then in this case your load balancing not working properly and sending more load to that server, and if you are getting stuck threads on both then try to add one more managed server.
Regards
Mukesh Negi
http://weblogicserveradministration.blogspot.com

Load Balance Problem in Oracle RAC 10.2.0.4 (two nodes with CRS)

Hi all,
I have an Oracle RAC 10.2.0.4 with two nodes and I'm having problems with sessions load balance.
The problem is that all connections are going to the node which is enabled as 'master' in RAC, the node who has located .db resource in CRS.
If .db resource is located in node1 all connections are made in node1. In the same way, all connections are made in node2 when .db resource from CRS stack is located in node2.
The connections are made by a pool in Tomcat 6 using RAC service for made the connections.
Any idea?
Thanks in advance.
Here is an example of my net configuration:
listener.ora in node1:
LISTENER_RAC_NODE1 =
(DESCRIPTION_LIST =
(DESCRIPTION =
(ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = node1_vip)(PORT = 1525)(IP = FIRST))
(ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = node1)(PORT = 1525)(IP = FIRST))
tnsnames in node1:
LISTENERS_RAC =
(ADDRESS_LIST =
(ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = node1_vip)(PORT = 1525))
(ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = node2_vip)(PORT = 1525))
NODE1 =
(DESCRIPTION =
(ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = node1_vip)(PORT = 1525))
(ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = node1)(PORT = 1525))
(CONNECT_DATA =
(SERVER = DEDICATED)
(SERVICE_NAME = rac)
(INSTANCE_NAME = rac1)
RAC =
(DESCRIPTION =
(ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = node1_vip)(PORT = 1525))
(ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = node2_vip)(PORT = 1525))
(LOAD_BALANCE = yes)
(CONNECT_DATA =
(SERVER = DEDICATED)
(SERVICE_NAME = rac)
********************************************************

It is my fault.
It was the connection service. I had one one with preferred option and one without it. Now is working well.

Oracle RAC - Load Balancing Problem

Our J2EE application transactions (Container-managed) are using MULTIPLE database connections to complete one business transaction.
Recently we swiched to below Oracle RAC configuration, and it is creating problems.
BEA 8.1 SP5 Multi Pools
Oracle 9i RAC (2 instances) : Active - Active
Algorithm : Load Balancing
Driver (JDBC) : Oracle 10g Release 1 Thin Driver
non-XA transactions
Looks like when LB algorithm is chosen, the load balacing is only **connection-aware** and NOT **transaction-aware**. Because of this, the application gets one connection from one RAC instance, and other from other instance is creating problems.
Is there any work-around exist for this problem?
If we chose, HIGH_AVAILABILTY algorithm, everything is fine. But we would like to make use of both instances.

Srinivas Chintala wrote:
Hello Joe,
Here is the configuration:
<JDBCConnectionPool DriverName="oracle.jdbc.OracleDriver"
InitialCapacity="10" MaxCapacity="30" Name="rac_node1"
PasswordEncrypted="{3DES}5M6WvgV8GsA=" Properties="user=apps"
StatementCacheSize="20" Targets="app_cluster"
TestConnectionsOnCreate="true" TestConnectionsOnRelease="true"
TestConnectionsOnReserve="true"
TestTableName="SQL SELECT 1 FROM DUAL" URL="jdbc:oracle:thin:@usplgmnvmdb001.iweb.com:1521:prod_1"/>
<JDBCConnectionPool DriverName="oracle.jdbc.OracleDriver"
InitialCapacity="10" MaxCapacity="30" Name="rac_node2"
PasswordEncrypted="{3DES}5M6WvgV8GsA=" Properties="user=apps"
StatementCacheSize="20" Targets="app_cluster"
TestConnectionsOnCreate="true" TestConnectionsOnRelease="true"
TestConnectionsOnReserve="true"
TestTableName="SQL SELECT 1 FROM DUAL" URL="jdbc:oracle:thin:@usplgmnvmdb002.iweb.com:1521:prod_2"/>
<JDBCMultiPool AlgorithmType="Load-Balancing" Name="appmutlipool"
PoolList="rac_node1,rac_node2" Targets="app_cluster"/>
<JDBCDataSource JNDIName="appdatasource" Name="AppDatasource"
PoolName="appmutlipool" Targets="app_cluster"/>
ChintalaHi, OK, that looks fine, except:
1 - I would define the initial and max capacity = 30, for performance and stability.
2 - For more performance, turn off test-on-release. It's a waste of cycles.
3 - You can change your TestTableName to "SQL BEGIN NULL; END;" which goes
even faster than "select 1 from dual".
And the main problem is:
4 - Your JDBCDataSource doesn't seem to be a transactional one, so any
application code that gets connections from that, will get independent
connections each time, and their work will not be included in any WLS
controlled transactions. You want to make/use a JDBCTxDataSource.
Joe

Load Balancing Issues SOMEBODY HELP ME!!

Good Morning.
A few days ago we implemented Load Balancing in our company, I printed a step by step procedure from MS and just follow it thinking that once I did that everything was going to be ok, but I am some issues that I managed to fix, but now I am stock in one
that I just can't figure it out, here I go.
When regular users try to connect to the Farm using the external IP they can't connect, we checked firewall seems to be ok, we check the configuration we did and we didn't miss any step, NOW here is the crazy part, when we use our Admin ID we can connect,
so I thought maybe is an Active Directory thing, but I don't know where to look or what to do so my questions are,
Can this be a licensing issue?
Do I have to have my TSBroker as part of my group of PC in the firewall?
Can it be a certificate issue? (not too sure because I can connect as an admin)
Can it be permissions to log in to the servers?
My co-worked is telling me now that if TS Broker sent them to TS1 they can connect but if TSBroker send them to the other two members of the farms they can't connect, TS1 is the original TS before this whole Load Balancing thing.
we tried so many solutions that we can find online and come up with and nothing seems to be working, so what do I do? What did I do wrong when I configure the Load balancing? is there any step beside what MS told me that I am missing...
PLEASE HELP!!
Thank you..

Hi Rodrigo,
Thank you for posting in Windows Server Forum.
What’s your server OS in your environment?
Firstly see that, if you have not set up RD Licensing server and don’t have RDS CAL then your administrator can only get access for RDP connection (only 2 connection for Admin purpose). Now if you want more than 2 connection you need to setup RD Licensing server,
activate it, purchase RDS CAL and install it. After installing, you need to see that your user have enough permission to access RDS server and your user must be added under “Remote Desktop User” local group under RDS Server.
As you have commented that your admin can able to connect so I think you must have the issue with user permission, please go through above points and check the result.
Please check below article for more details.
1. TS Session Broker Load Balancing Step-by-Step Guide (Server 2008)
2. Checklist: Create a Load-Balanced RD Session Host Server Farm by Using RD Connection Broker (Server 2008 R2)
Hope it helps!
Thanks.
Dharmesh Solanki

Weblogic DB connection pool load balancing problem

hi all,
here is a strange issue. We have a clustered weblogic environment with2 servers. And the application is deployed to cluster. But strangely when we check the active connections for the connection pool that is being used by the application, we see that 2nd server has more connections when compared to 1st server, lets say 1st server has 4 active connections, 2nd server has 50 connections, What might be the problem.
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<jdbc-data-source xmlns="http://www.bea.com/ns/weblogic/jdbc-data-source" xmlns:sec="http://www.bea.com/ns/weblogic/90/security" xmlns:wls="http://www.bea.com/ns/weblogic/90/security/wls" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.bea.com/ns/weblogic/jdbc-data-source http://www.bea.com/ns/weblogic/jdbc-data-source/1.0/jdbc-data-source.xsd">
<name>##########</name>
<jdbc-driver-params>
<url>jdbc:oracle:thin:@hostname:portnumber:Schema</url>
<driver-name>oracle.jdbc.OracleDriver</driver-name>
<properties>
<property>
<name>user</name>
<value>#####</value>
</property>
<property>
<name>portNumber</name>
<value>#####</value>
</property>
<property>
<name>SID</name>
<value>######</value>
</property>
<property>
<name>serverName</name>
<value>hostname</value>
</property>
</properties>
<password-encrypted>##########</password-encrypted>
<use-xa-data-source-interface>false</use-xa-data-source-interface>
</jdbc-driver-params>
<jdbc-connection-pool-params>
<initial-capacity>0</initial-capacity>
<max-capacity>75</max-capacity>
<capacity-increment>5</capacity-increment>
<shrink-frequency-seconds>900</shrink-frequency-seconds>
<highest-num-waiters>2147483647</highest-num-waiters>
<connection-creation-retry-frequency-seconds>0</connection-creation-retry-frequency-seconds>
<connection-reserve-timeout-seconds>10</connection-reserve-timeout-seconds>
<test-frequency-seconds>60</test-frequency-seconds>
<test-connections-on-reserve>true</test-connections-on-reserve>
<profile-harvest-frequency-seconds>300</profile-harvest-frequency-seconds>
<ignore-in-use-connections-enabled>true</ignore-in-use-connections-enabled>
<inactive-connection-timeout-seconds>0</inactive-connection-timeout-seconds>
<test-table-name>SQL SELECT 1 FROM DUAL</test-table-name>
<login-delay-seconds>0</login-delay-seconds>
<statement-cache-size>10</statement-cache-size>
<statement-cache-type>LRU</statement-cache-type>
<remove-infected-connections>true</remove-infected-connections>
<seconds-to-trust-an-idle-pool-connection>10</seconds-to-trust-an-idle-pool-connection>
<statement-timeout>-1</statement-timeout>
<profile-type>0</profile-type>
<pinned-to-thread>false</pinned-to-thread>
</jdbc-connection-pool-params>
<jdbc-data-source-params>
<jndi-name>##########</jndi-name>
</jdbc-data-source-params>
</jdbc-data-source>

are you using any front end web server or hardware load balancer ? verify your load balancing if it's happening or not properly between your clustered managed servers.
Regards
Mukesh Negi
http://weblogicserveradministration.blogspot.com/

Printer Pool load balancing problem.

We seem to be having a problem with printer load balancing working correctly. I have several computer labs. Each lab has at least 2 printers of the same type. As a result I pool the printers for each lab. We are still running ZCM10.3.4. Most of the clients are running iprint 5.82. With Zenworks 7 and 6.5 load balancing on these printers worked very well and page counts stayed very close on each printer. Now that we are at ZCM10 and have been for about 3 years now we continually see that one printer gets the majority of jobs. Most of the computers are imaged but printers are installed after imaging. Even if we alternate the default printer on the computer print jobs still mostly come out the same printer. All printers except 3 are HP and in our case they are all new HP M602's with a couple older HP4015DN's thrown in when the new HP M602's would print garbage across the wan and the 4015's would print correctly but that is another topic.
Am I misunderstanding how load balancing is supposed to work? Isn't load balancing supposed to be one of the features of printer pooling in addition to sending jobs to the printer that is not busy at the time the job is sent? How is load balancing set up?
Thank you.

are you using any front end web server or hardware load balancer ? verify your load balancing if it's happening or not properly between your clustered managed servers.
Regards
Mukesh Negi
http://weblogicserveradministration.blogspot.com/

Bind Load balancing problem..expert help required

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for