Bitmap fonts look ugly in terminal?

http://i.imgur.com/60oKumZ.png
The lemon font looks absolutely horrible, any idea's on how to fix it?
-- mod edit: read the Forum Etiquette and only post thumbnails http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/For … s_and_Code [jwr] --

2ManyDogs wrote:
Try adjusting the letter spacing in your ~/.Xresources.
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Urxvt#Font_spacing
Remember to reload .Xresources after you make the change, or nothing will happen.
That did fix it a lot, but, it still doesn't look the same. It's too "squarey" if that makes sense? Here's a comparison/
Mine:
What it's supposed to look like:
I had it working fine before, but now all of a sudden it just shit the bed
-- mod edit: read the Forum Etiquette and only post thumbnails http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/For … s_and_Code [jwr] --
Last edited by jasonwryan (2014-11-05 04:50:50)

Similar Messages

[Solved]Xfce fonts look strange in Terminal

Never had this before maybe something went wrong on the catalyst installation, can't really describe it either so I will just post a picture.
Hope that you can help it isn't really fatally but it's just ugly
Last edited by heldiho53 (2014-10-01 18:56:05)

brebs wrote:
I would exit xorg (otherwise xorg will probably crash), then run as root:
fc-cache -rf
/usr/share/fonts: error scanning
/usr/share/fonts/encodings: error scanning

Bitmap Font gets blurry when its swf is loaded into a movie clip

I have a gallery i'm working on, located here:
http://www.stationarynotes.com/portfolio/Gallery.html
If you click the first button (the one that looks like a
splattered "S" in black ink) you'll see that my bitmap text gets
rendered all blurry. That swf which is being loaded renders fine
when I test it by itself. The text is positioned with whole numbers
and aligns to the grid within its own swf, and the movie clip which
receives it is also positioned with whole numbers. Do you think
perhaps when it is loaded into another MC it is being pushed off of
the grid somehow...? I'm really confused.
I can post my .flas if that'll help.

bitmap fonts look best when positioned on a whole pixel
number (100.0 instead of 100.4 for example).
If you are loading into an empty clip - try placing that clip
on the nearest whole number. or you
could load the external swf to a level with will position it
at 0,0 (upper left corner of stage).
--> **Adobe Certified Expert**
--> www.mudbubble.com
--> www.keyframer.com
Scruffpuff wrote:
> I have a gallery i'm working on, located here:
>
http://www.stationarynotes.com/portfolio/Gallery.html
>
> If you click the first button (the one that looks like a
splattered "S" in
> black ink) you'll see that my bitmap text gets rendered
all blurry. That swf
> which is being loaded renders fine when I test it by
itself. The text is
> positioned with whole numbers and aligns to the grid
within its own swf, and
> the movie clip which receives it is also positioned with
whole numbers. Do you
> think perhaps when it is loaded into another MC it is
being pushed off of the
> grid somehow...? I'm really confused.
>
> I can post my .flas if that'll help.
>

Bitmapped fonts - do I need 'em?

Hi,
I have several fonts installed by default which are bitmapped fonts, such as Helvetica, which looks - as we say in England - as rough as arseholes. My ttf fonts look lovely, mind.
It wouldn't normally bother me but there are some web sites, such as theregister.co.uk which actually specify Helvetica, as opposed to my default, anti-aliased sans-serif font.
Basically, I'm wondering if
a) is there something I can do to tidy them up to make them stop looking so jagged?
b) can I remove them altogether? I fear it may upset things like Latex which I use regularly.
The former is obviously preferred.
TIA

Phrakature,
I've finally got around to trying your suggestion, but unfortunately, it seems to have made little difference
Here is my local.conf
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "fonts.dtd">

<fontconfig>

<match target="pattern" >
<edit mode="assign" name="autohint" >
<bool>true</bool>
</edit>
</match>


<alias>
<family>helvetica</family>
<prefer><family>Bitstream Vera Sans Mono</family></prefer>
<default><family>fixed</family></default>
</alias>
 <dir>/usr/local/share/fonts</dir>
<dir>/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts</dir>
</fontconfig>
The addition of your alias suggestion has been the only change i've directly made to his file. I've installed some fonts using the KDE font manager and so that may have messed with the file, although I can't be certain.
Anything obvious?
PS As I said earlier, non-bitmapped fonts look fine. I've checked my xorg.conf to ensure freetype is being used, which is.

Terminal fonts turned ugly after last update

Terminal font Monospace 11 turned ugly after today's system update.
Before that, I even didn't use antialiasing, so nice and crisp they were.
Turning antialiasing on helps partially, but this font looks kinda blurry.
I am running Xfce4 under Arch64. Here is the fonts part from xorg.conf:
Section "Files"
RgbPath "/usr/share/X11/rgb"
ModulePath "/usr/lib/xorg/modules"
FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/misc"
FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/75dpi"
FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/100dpi"
FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/cyrillic"
FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/Type1"
FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/TTF"
FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/artwiz-fonts"
FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/encodings"
FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/util"
EndSection
And yes, I am using Community, Extra and Testing depositories.
My screen is LCD 1440x900 with 96x96 resolution.

same thing happened to me gnome-terminal font

Fonts in Latex look ugly

Hi,
i am writing my bachelorthesis in latex. At home i compile it with latex running archlinux and at work i compile my thesis with latex running windows (using MikTex and TeXnicCenter).
I compile my thesis with pdflatex and the pdf compiled on windows has much nicer fonts then the linux one.
I have tried different settings but the windows version looks nicer no matter what is do. Has anyone made similar experiences?
Or am I just using the wrong setting to get nice fonts in linux?
Here are the packages I use:
\documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{scrreprt}
\usepackage[ngerman]{babel}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage{lmodern}
\usepackage{graphicx}

thanks for all the hints. I checked the log file and latex uses the <fontname>.pfb fonts.
I view the pdf with Okular (Kde 4.2.2) and the fonts look different depending on how much I zoom in. In normal view (without zoom) the fonts look really thin (looks like certain characters like "o" have holes in them), but when I zoom in the fonts start looking better. I switched on subpixel hinting in the KDE systemsettings so I think that should work.
I will check the pdf generated by linux with the acrobat reader on windows and see if it looks better.

Helvetica fonts in Firefox looks ugly

Hello my friends, though i am happy with Arch and my fonts looks great, in firefox 7 those pages that use helvetica looks kind of strange.
This is how it looks in Chromium
This is how it looks in Firefox
I've installed w7-fonts, and the next code in the .fonts.conf
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
<match target="font" >
<edit mode="assign" name="rgba" >
<const>rgb</const>
</edit>
</match>
<match target="font" >
<edit mode="assign" name="hinting">
<bool>true</bool>
</edit>
</match>
<match target="font" >
<edit mode="assign" name="hintstyle">
<const>hintslight</const>
</edit>
</match>
</fontconfig>

I use in ~/.fonts.conf
<match target="pattern" name="family">
<test name="family" qual="any">
<string>Helvetica</string>
</test>
<edit binding="strong" mode="prepend" name="family">
<string>Arial</string>
</edit>
</match>
$ fc-match helvetica
arial.ttf: "Arial" "Normal"

[solved] urxvt terminal: Bitmap fonts not working

Hello
I can't get bitmap fonts to work with urxtv (aka rxvt-unicode).
Here's output of fc-list : file -command
$ fc-list : file
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/53-monospace-lcd-filter.conf", line 10: Having multiple values in <test> isn't supported and may not work as expected
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/DejaVuSerif-BoldItalic.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/Type1/a010015l.pfb:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/comic.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/Type1/n019043l.pfb:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/DejaVuSans-ExtraLight.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/Type1/n019044l.pfb:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/DroidSansArmenian.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/times.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/DroidSansEthiopic-Regular.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/DejaVuSerif-Bold.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/Type1/n022003l.pfb:
/usr/share/fonts/Type1/n022004l.pfb:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/arial.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/DroidSansHebrew-Regular.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/Type1/n021023l.pfb:
/usr/share/fonts/Type1/n021024l.pfb:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/ariblk.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/Type1/n019023l.pfb:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/DroidSansFallbackLegacy.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/Type1/n022023l.pfb:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/verdana.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/Type1/n022024l.pfb:
/usr/share/fonts/Type1/n019024l.pfb:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/TerminusBold.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/cantarell/Cantarell-Bold.otf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/DejaVuSansCondensed.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/timesi.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/DroidKufi-Bold.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/VeraMoBI.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/DejaVuSansMono-BoldOblique.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/DroidKufi-Regular.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/Type1/n021003l.pfb:
/usr/share/fonts/Type1/n021004l.pfb:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/andalemo.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/DroidSansHebrew-Bold.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/Ubuntu-B.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/Ubuntu-R.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/Type1/n019003l.pfb:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/Ubuntu-C.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/VeraMoBd.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/TerminusMediumItalic.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/DejaVuSerifCondensed-BoldItalic.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/DejaVuSerif-Italic.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/Type1/n019004l.pfb:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/VeraMoIt.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/DejaVuSansMono.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/DroidSansGeorgian.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/DroidSansEthiopic-Bold.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/Ubuntu-L.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/DroidSansJapanese.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/TerminusMedium.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/DejaVuSans-BoldOblique.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/VeraMono.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/DejaVuSansCondensed-Oblique.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/DroidNaskh-Regular.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/DejaVuSans.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/cour.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/georgia.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/DejaVuSansCondensed-Bold.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/VeraSe.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/UbuntuMono-BI.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/DroidSerif-BoldItalic.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/Type1/c059036l.pfb:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/VeraSeBd.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/DroidSans-Bold.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/Type1/c059033l.pfb:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/Ubuntu-RI.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/DejaVuSansMono-Oblique.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/cantarell/Cantarell-Regular.otf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/VeraBI.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/DroidSansTamil-Regular.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/VeraIt.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/DroidSerif-Regular.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/DroidNaskh-Regular-SystemUI.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/Type1/d050000l.pfb:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/VeraBd.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/DroidSans.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/UbuntuMono-RI.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/Type1/c059016l.pfb:
/usr/share/fonts/Type1/s050000l.pfb:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/verdanai.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/verdanaz.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/Type1/c059013l.pfb:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/Ubuntu-BI.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/verdanab.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/trebucit.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/DejaVuSerifCondensed-Italic.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/Ubuntu-LI.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/DejaVuSans-Bold.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/DejaVuSerif.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/georgiai.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/DejaVuSansMono-Bold.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/DroidSansThai.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/trebucbd.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/DejaVuSerifCondensed.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/couri.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/georgiab.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/Type1/b018032l.pfb:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/DroidNaskh-Bold.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/georgiaz.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/timesbi.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/arialbd.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/Type1/b018035l.pfb:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/UbuntuMono-B.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/trebucbi.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/UbuntuMono-R.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/arialbi.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/DroidSansArabic.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/timesbd.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/DroidSerif-Bold.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/DroidSansDevanagari-Regular.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/DejaVuSansCondensed-BoldOblique.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/Type1/z003034l.pfb:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/DroidSansFallback.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/courbi.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/comicbd.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/Type1/b018012l.pfb:
/usr/share/fonts/Type1/p052004l.pfb:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/DroidSerif-Italic.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/webdings.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/Type1/b018015l.pfb:
/usr/share/fonts/Type1/a010033l.pfb:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/DroidSansTamil-Bold.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/Type1/p052003l.pfb:
/usr/share/fonts/Type1/a010035l.pfb:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/DejaVuSerifCondensed-Bold.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/Type1/n019063l.pfb:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/trebuc.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/courbd.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/Type1/n019064l.pfb:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/Vera.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/DroidSansMono.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/Type1/p052024l.pfb:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/impact.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/ariali.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/DejaVuSans-Oblique.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/Type1/a010013l.pfb:
/usr/share/fonts/TTF/DroidSansFallbackFull.ttf:
/usr/share/fonts/Type1/p052023l.pfb:
What I've read, there should be /usr/share/fonts/local/* too in that list.
I run my window manager, dwm with startx and ~/.xinitrc has these lines before dwm:
xset +fp /usr/share/fonts/local
xset fp rehash
I have also tried to include those with xorg.conf:
$ cat /etc/X11/xorg.conf
Section "Files"
FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/local/"
EndSection
I'm using Ubuntu's patched versions of freetype, fontconfig and cairo if that has anything to do with my problem:
freetype2-ubuntu fontconfig-ubuntu cairo-ubuntu
Xft fonts work fine with urxvt, but bitmaps don't. What am I missing?
Last edited by NAND (2013-01-29 16:13:00)

There isn't a "tamsynu" family in the tamsyn-font package. You're trying to use a font that doesn't exist on your machine.
$ xlsfonts -fn "-*-tamsynu-*"
xlsfonts: pattern "-*-tamsynu-*" unmatched
$ xlsfonts -fn "-*-tamsyn-*"
-misc-tamsyn-bold-r-normal--0-0-100-100-c-0-iso8859-1
-misc-tamsyn-bold-r-normal--12-87-100-100-c-60-iso8859-1
<< And more >>
The syntax for the resource is fine, but it is case-sensitive. The class is 'URxvt', an instance would be 'urxvt'.
This should be good for a first attempt at the proper size:
urxvt.font: -misc-tamsyn-medium-r-normal--14-101-100-100-c-70-iso8859-1
urxvt.boldFont: -misc-tamsyn-bold-r-normal--14-101-100-100-c-70-iso8859-1
That's about equal to DejaVu Sans Mono at 8 points.
If you have rebuilt your font cache, either by restarting X or running 'fc-cache -f', and you want to use Xft, then this is equivalent (Tamsyn does not use anti-aliasing):
urxvt.font: xft:Tamsyn:style=Regular:size=10.1
urxvt.boldFont: xft:Tamsyn:style=Bold:size=10.1

URxvt poor performance with Bitmap fonts

I'm trying to use a bitmap font with URxvt terminal and I find the performance is terrible after. If i use an XFT font it works perfect. When I set a bitmap font I can see the screen redraw while scrolling through vim and if another terminal is outputting lots of data the other terminals will slow to a crawl. Also when the terminal gains focus I will see a flicker occur as it redraws the text.
I tried using XTerm and it does not experience this problem at all. It only seems to be with URXvt that this problem occurs. I've tried several different bitmap fonts and it's the same for all of them. Again XFT works fine.
Any ideas?

I don't use testing, but have cairo-xcb installed from AUR, which is version 1.12.0-1. I just tried to replace it with the package in testing, but this did not have any effect. Downgrading cairo-xcb gives problems because of the libpng14 stuff. I will look for the source of a previous version and build it, to see if this is the problem.
edit...
You are right, the problem is cairo. I rebuild and installed cairo-xcb 1.10.2 and gvim was as quick as it used to be. When I upgrade it again it slows down.
Last edited by FreeTheBee (2012-04-03 20:26:04)

Can't use bitmap font in GUI apps

I like the look of bitmap fonts and I used to be able to use them in GUI apps such as GTK apps.
For the last few months whenever I try to start GUI app with a bitmap font selected the application crashes. Always with the same error message about cairo-scaled-font.
For example, here is my terminal output when I try to start dwb using the bitmap font Lemon as my default font:
dwb: cairo-scaled-font.c:459: _cairo_scaled_glyph_page_destroy: Assertion '!scaled_font->cache_frozen' failed.
This problem is not limited to just dwb but any GUI app when I try to use any bitmap font.
I've tried googling the problem and the only advice I could find was to run fc-cache -fv, which didn't fix the issue.
Any help would be appreciated.

I normally use BSPWM as my window manager, and I have just discovered that If I try to start dwb in Gnome it actually works!
This isn't really a solution for me because I spend most of my time in BSPWM, but it's interesting.

Why are the fonts so ugly?

When I'm using the Adobe Acrobat Reader plugin (10.1.8.24) in Firefox (25.0.1 in this case) I'm getting terriby ugly fonts from domcuments I'm invoking from sites.
In MSIE 11.0.9600 the fonts look fine and anti-aliased. Not so in FF.
Example (ugly case):
Example (nice):
I'm using Noscript (a javascript / script blocker) and it might have to do something with this but even when I disable the blocker temporarily, it doesn't make the fonts look nicer.
Any clues?
TIA,
Christoph

Are you sure you are using the Adobe Reader plugin, and not Firefox' own PDF viewer? See http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1158136

Showing bangla character in all types of java mobile using bitmap fonts

i am a new user of j2me.but i cannot find any helps.
i want to do english to bangla dictionary for all types of java mobile using bitmap
fonts.
initially how can i display bangla character using bitmap font in non unicode supported java mobile???
but i cant do it.
please send me source code or any helping resource.
i am waiting for your reply.

More info; installed mplayer2 which should work better with vdpau and this happened;
VO: [vdpau] 800x468 => 800x468 Planar YV12
[vdpau] Got display refresh rate 60.015 Hz.
[vdpau] If that value looks wrong give the -vo vdpau:fps=X suboption manually.
A: 6.3 V: 6.4 A-V: -0.000 ct: 0.000 0/ 0 1% 2% 0.2% 0 0
[h264 @ 0xb6b41640]left block unavailable for requested intra mode at 0 23
[h264 @ 0xb6b41640]error while decoding MB 0 23, bytestream (1111)
[h264 @ 0xb6b41640]concealing 399 DC, 399 AC, 399 MV errors
A: 6.5 V: 6.6 A-V: 0.000 ct: -0.000 0/ 0 1% 2% 0.2% 0 0
Seek failed
Seek failed
Seek failed
Seek failed
Seek failed
Seek failed
Alot of those "Seek failed"!

Question - Y do my fonts look slightly different when publish site to .mac?

I've created a website on iWeb but when i publish it and view it in safari the fonts look slightly different. It's hard to explain but they basically just look worse. Can anyone let me know why this might be and how i could fix this problem. Thanks in advance.

Quit iWeb, go to Home Folder/Library/Preferences and delete the file com.apple.iWeb.plist.
Restart your Mac, launch iWeb and republish.
You should really convert any text done in "copperplate" to an image. Otherwise it will be converted to an (ugly) alternative on any computer that doesn't have this font installed.

[svn:osmf:] 13113: Changing to not use an embedded font by default, and adding instructions on how to use the free 'type writer' bitmap font.

Revision: 13113
Revision: 13113
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2009-12-21 01:08:10 -0800 (Mon, 21 Dec 2009)
Log Message:
Changing to not use an embedded font by default, and adding instructions on how to use the free 'type writer' bitmap font.
Modified Paths:
    osmf/trunk/libs/ChromeLibrary/.flexLibProperties
    osmf/trunk/libs/ChromeLibrary/src/org/osmf/chrome/controlbar/widgets/ScrubBar.as
    osmf/trunk/libs/ChromeLibrary/src/org/osmf/chrome/controlbar/widgets/URLInput.as
Added Paths:
    osmf/trunk/libs/ChromeLibrary/src/org/osmf/chrome/fonts/
    osmf/trunk/libs/ChromeLibrary/src/org/osmf/chrome/fonts/Fonts.as
Removed Paths:
    osmf/trunk/libs/ChromeLibrary/assets/images/stop_up.png_1

Your site was built using tables, whose sizes are defined in your site.
If we look at your first table definition, we can see:
<table width="861" height="1449" border="3" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" bordercolor="#868787">
Your table has a width of 861 pixels and an overall height of 1449 pixels. Anything you put into that overall box must fit those dimensions, else
it won't be visible. Anything you add above it will push everything down. You can redefine your sizing to let you edit more inside of the table elements.
This is why, when you type in more text, things act weird. If you are in Dreamweaver, you must find the right cell to put your text into and then enter
text there. Unfortunately, this is going to push things around, which were all lined up using tables. And this gets everything offset with respect to
everything else in your website.
And that is why everyone is saying, "Start Over!"
I just inherited a website that has been put together using tables. I'm going to have to expend considerable effort in rewriting the entire design of the
website because of that. because everything I intend to add to the pages on the site is going to need to be deconstructed in order to get it to work
properly if I'm adding text and pictures that need to line up with each other.
You need something done quick and dirty and the only way I can recommend you do that is to use Dreamweaver to show you the tables you have
and put what you need in a new table that is defined above or below the tables you all ready have defined. Do that and then get back to someone here
who knows how to make a website correctly to clean up your entire website and make it editable -- which will cost you some money, but it will be
money well-spent.
I like to quote this maxim: Good, Fast, Cheap. Pick any two. This works for website design. You can get it fast and cheap, but it won't be good. I
think you may have chosen that route.

Using Bitmap Fonts in MIDlet development

Any and all help appreciated on this.
I'm working on this assignment that requires use of bitmap fonts. We need 2 colors of fonts and 2 sizes. What's the best way to approach this?
Any places that you recommend buying them from and have used in your projects? Wish to stay away from ones that have heavy-duty licensing issues (lack of bandwidth to look into all legal possibilities). Are there any free ones available?
What are the other catches in this area?
Thanks,
Sasha

Would GNU Screen be the answer to my question?

Bitmap fonts look ugly in terminal?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for