Biztalk 2010 : Dynamic send Port Block : HTTP Adapter

Hi
I have a customer who makes an intensive use of the DefaultServerApp host instance.
All of his applications use this instance for dynamic send port ( HTTP send adapter)
The problem is sometimes the messages accumulate in the message queue of the HTTP Send adapter and I have to restart the host instance to fix the problem until it appears again a month later.
note: many messages are timed out , could this to be the root cause ?

Secondary messagebox
 -why !!!!
You have an issue in just one of the host instances. Where is this Secondary messagebox came into play? Is your database struggle with the load and does the message process
affect “all your processing in BizTalk”?
Or is this issue in host instance/design related. As you have many dynamic ports all of them will be using the default host instance. Some of these processes may have high
volume or high size messages so your host instance may be struggling to process the message and could cause the memory/process usage related issue. Exactly for these reasons Microsoft has given an option to tweaking the host processing and throttling setting.
Adding an additional messagebox database would be overdo for your issue.
Consider tweaking the throttling settings. If the process memory was increasing
continuously and if your investigation boils down to process memory usage for this issue, consider tweaking the
Process memory usage and Physical memory usage throttling thresholds.
Consider the suggestions from this MSDN article..
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/918643
Also consider about adding more RAM, physical memory.
As I mentioned in my earlier post, run the messagebox viewer tool and review its reports for health of the server.
Also ensure you have the latest version of Cumulative Update for your version of BizTalk installed. In some of the CUs, fix for memory leak has been included.
Another suggestion, review the design where you have so many dynamic ports. May be some of these processes have high volume or high size messages and since all use the dynamic
ports hence the same host instance you could have this issue. Consider to move away from dynamic port for some of the processes, if you find either high volume or high size message processing.
If this answers your question please mark it accordingly. If this post is helpful, please vote as helpful by clicking the upward arrow mark next to my reply.

Similar Messages

  • How to configure Send Handler for BizTalk 2013 Dynamic Send Port on deployment?

    Hi,
    I do know how to manually configure a send handler for a dynamic send port in BizTalk 2013 Administration console. Though, once you export your application's configuration to a binding file, the dynamic send port's configuration does not
    contain any information regarding the send handler. When you try to use this binding file when deploying your application your dynamic port's send handler falls back to the default host instance.
    So my question is, how could we automate this process to avoid manual step in a dynamic port configuration during deployment?
    Thank you,
    --Vlad

    Hey vlad,
    As discussed at work in the office.. I woudl take the powershelll approach for now as a workaround.  Here's a trivial script for my local dev box (all in one biztalk & SQL)  (must be run in an x86 powershell session):
    param
     [string] $bizTalkDbServer = ".",    
     [string] $bizTalkDbName = "BizTalkMgmtDb",
     [string] $fileHostInstance = "SendingHost",
     [string] $sendPortName = "sm_dynamic_sp_test"
    [System.reflection.Assembly]::LoadWithPartialName("Microsoft.BizTalk.ExplorerOM") | Out-Null
    $catalog = New-Object Microsoft.BizTalk.ExplorerOM.BtsCatalogExplorer
    $catalog.ConnectionString = "SERVER=$bizTalkDbServer;DATABASE=$bizTalkDbName;Integrated Security=SSPI"
    foreach($sp in $catalog.SendPorts)
     if($sp.Name -eq $sendPortName)
      "Found send port $($sp.Name), analyzing send handler"
      foreach($sh in $sp.DynamicSendHandlers)
       if($sh.SendHandler.TransportType.Name -eq "FILE")
        if($sh.SendHandler.Host.Name -ne $fileHostInstance)
         "Changing $($sh.Name) send handler to '$fileHostInstance' from '$($sh.SendHandler.Host.Name)'"
         $sp.SetSendHandler("FILE", $fileHostInstance)
        else
         "Send handler for $($sp.Name) is already '$fileHostInstance' ignorning .. "
    $catalog.SaveChanges()

  • BizTalk Server 2013 and deployment MSI with dynamic send ports

    Hello community, wonder if any help out there for this odd problem.
    Deployment of application msi fails into BizTalk 2013 prod environment, fails when deploying the project dll that contains all the orchestrations,
    and reports a failure to apply early bindings.  The only early bindings in this project are dynamic send ports.  I cannot recreate the problem in in my QAS environment where deployments of the same msi works fine.  
    I can build an msi without any bindings at all except for the dynamically created ones, and this also display the same behaviour on import.  
    I have test deployed a 2nd unrelated app that also uses dynamic send ports, and this displays the problem.  
    Adding the assembly directly to BizTalk console displays the same behaviour.
    Deployment of msi apps without dynamic send ports are ok.
    The dynamic ports use a pipeline including a custom pipeline component which I can confirm is available in the correct directory
    C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft BizTalk Server 2013\Pipeline Components
    No specific further detail is available in the error except.
    Import Wizard[09/05/2014 08:20:47]: Error in Importing Application
    Import Wizard[09/05/2014 08:20:47]: Change requests failed for some resources.
    BizTalkAssemblyResourceManager failed to complete end type change request.
    Unable to deploy early bindings.
    Failed to update binding information.
    Error in the application.
    Other information that may be relevant:
    The main difference between QAS and PROD is that PROD is a two node cluster.  Import behaviour is the same if attempted on either node.  Assemblies are installed in both nodes currently.
    The dynamic ports are set on handlers that are non-clustered hosts (all are for adapter type SMTP).
    I have ensured that all the adapter handlers are identically setup in both environments.
    The project files were migrated to BizTalk 2013 from BizTalk 2010, imported and then converted using VS 2012.
    The msi has installed the assemblies as per usual and they do exist in the .net 4 gac
    There is a reference to a shared resource in a different application, this application is installed and imported ok.
    I’m a bit stuck at what to try now, I have option where I could recreate the dynamic ports from scratch in the orchestrations and redeploy to dev in the hope it’s something that VS2012 didn’t handle too gracefully
    when converting the project.  I could move the functionality into a helper class and forget about using dynamic sends, rather not go down that route.  I'm still suspecting this is small difference in setup
    of the group between QAS and PROD but I can't see anything jumping out.
    Any comments are most welcome.

    The dynamic ports use a pipeline including a custom pipeline component which I can confirm is available in the correct directory
    C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft BizTalk Server 2013\Pipeline Components
    I’m a bit stuck at what to try now, I have option where I could recreate the dynamic ports from scratch in the orchestrations and redeploy to dev in the hope it’s something
    that VS2012 didn’t handle too gracefully when converting the project. 
    Two things.
    1. That's what I would do first, recreate (really just change and reset the properties) the Orchestration Ports in Visual Studio.
    2. Probably not related but, Custom Pipeline Components should not be placed in the Pipeline Components folder.  All Custom Pipeline Components should be in the GAC only.  The Pipeline Components folder
    is a compatibility vestige from BizTalk Server 2004.

  • Dynamic Send Port : The FILE send adapter cannot open file C:\Temp for writing. Details: Access is denied.

    Hi All,
    We have requirement of using ESB toolkit and transforming incoming xml file to edi format. So, we are using ItinerarySelectReceiveXML pipeline for receiving the input from the input location and "EDISend" pipeline for transforming it into EDI and
    send it to destination.
    Now, the receive pipeline is picking up the file, but it is not processed and sent to destination.
    And, we are getting an Access Denied error from Dynamic send port.
    Error Description : 
    The FILE send adapter cannot open file C:\Users\Public\Temp for writing.
     Details: Access is denied.
    Any Immediate solutions/suggestions are appreciated...Thanks.
    Anand

    The difference between dynamic and static port would be send handler. For dynamic port, default send handler will be used and for static port the one configured on the port will be used, could you validate this configuration.
    Also sometimes, administrative privileges are not "real" administrative privileges and company admins will have limited permissions on C Drive folders. Try writing to some other folder to isolate the issue.
    Regards, Ajeet Kumar MCTS Biztalk Server

  • BAM. Track message payload inside dynamic send port

    Somehow Biztalk 2010 BAM fails to track message payload inside dynamic send port. Messaging properties and Context properties (from our own property schema) are tracked correctly.
    I'm using XMLTransmit with specified document schema property on the send port, but this does not help.
    Tracking the same properties on Receive port is successful.
    What could cause this kind of behavior?

    I do not use ESB. There are only simple send ports. I have been trying to track message payload either from static and from dynamic sen ports. In both cases it does not track anything (only null values).
    I've trying with simple solution: one send and one receive ports. No mapping or other stuff. Tracking profile had the same fields set, both with two ports mapped: one send, and one receive. Receive port line is filled with correct values from message, while
    send port line stays empty (null).
    What could cause such behavior?

  • Dynamically assign a send pipeline to a dynamic send port in orchestration

    Hi
    I have an orchestration that is using a dynamic send port. I need to somehow assign the send pipeline to the dynamic send port programmatically.
    for example, I will have a decide shape in the orchestration. Based on the condition in the decide shape I need to assign the corresponding send pipeline for that condition. let's say in Branch A, I want to select xml assembler , in Branch B I will want
    to select a flat file assembler...
    how can this be achieved. I have seen some links recommending using the ESB tool kit, but I do not want to go down that route.
    any help is appreciated
    Regards, Mazin - MCTS BizTalk Server 2006

    Ashwin
    Thanks again for your reply.
    If I do it using role links I will loose the flexibility I have "having a dynamic file name" lots of our partners would like to receive their files with specific file naming convention based on the content of the file.
    If I use a decide shape / another dynamic send port, this means that everytime I have a new custom pipeline I would need to modify the orchestration and add another decide branch with another dynamic send port.
    both of the above suggestions will break the flexibility of the solution since we now can configure new partners in seconds in the configuration database without the need to modify the orchestration or add any new send ports
    Regards, Mazin - MCTS BizTalk Server 2006
    So in your requirement, the “dynamic” nature you want from send port are
     following:
    To set the send file names dynamically depends on the message received.
    To send the message to different send locations depending on the message received. You want to retrieve this destination URL location from database.
    And send ports may have different pipeline component like flat-file and XML ones.
    As I have commented in my earlier reply, Role-Link could fit your bill perfectly and this can be achieved by using following:
    1) Receive a message into an Orchestration.
    2) In Orchestration set the file name dynamically based on the received file and following code shall help you to set the name of the file to dynamic. 
    msgToBeSend(FILE.ReceivedFileName)="YourDynamicFileNameUWantToAssign";
    Use the above while constructing the outgoing message.
    3) Create a “Provider” Role-Link with send port type following the wizard.
    4) In Orchestration’s expression shape may be before sending the message out,
    performs the party resolution using a code similar to the following:  
    YourRoleLinkName(Microsoft.XLANGs.BaseTypes.DestinationParty) = new Microsoft.XLANGs.BaseTypes.Party(msgToBeSend.YourDistingushedPropertyToIdentifyParty, "OrganizationName");
    5) In the above sample code “YourDistingushedPropertyToIdentifyParty” refer for the code which could identify the partyname where the send port is configured.
    6) Create Parties representing different type of message to be send like flat-file or XML messages.
    7) Create a static send port and populate the outbound URL dynamically by using a custom pipeline component. In the custom pipeline component URL can be dynamically bound by calling the database as per your reqirement i.e based on the received message by
    accessing its content in custom pipeline access the database, find the destination URL and assign the “OutboundTransportLocation” context property of the outbound message something like this 
    msgToBeSend.Context.Promote("OutboundTransportLocation", "http://schemas.microsoft.com/BizTalk/2003/system-properties", YourOutboundURLFromDatabase);
    Refer this article on this topic:
    http://www.codit.eu/blog/2013/03/06/adding-dynamic-behavior-to-static-send-ports-a-caveat/
    8) In the Parties you have created assign the send ports.
    9) GoTo your “Role-Links” folder within the deployed BizTalk application and enlist the parties.
    These steps enable you to achieve the dynamic requirement you want to implement with the mentioned Role-Link.
    Regards,
    M.R.Ashwin Prabhu
    If this answers your question please mark it accordingly. If this post is helpful, please vote as helpful by clicking the upward arrow mark next to my reply.

  • Set Custome pipeline for dynamic send port in orchestration

    I need to assign custom pipeline for dynamic send port in an orchestration .

    The option is available in the Port Configuration wizard
    Thanks, Murugesan M - Please Mark as the Answer, if this answers your question. Please vote as helpful, if this post is helpful.

  • How to configure SMTP dynamic send port?

    Hi,
    I am trying to configure STMP send port to send emails, enabled SMTP Server on the DEV box and configured it as described in the link below.
    https://sandroaspbiztalkblog.wordpress.com/2013/05/09/biztalk-2013-installation-and-configuration-install-and-configure-smtp-server-feature-part-4/
    Able to send emails using Telnet client, and these email get stored in C:\inetpub\mailroot\Queue folder.
    I have a dynamic send with following values.
    msgEMail(SMTP.CC) = “[email protected]”;
    msgEMail(SMTP.DeliveryReceipt) = False;
    msgEMail(SMTP.From) = “[email protected]”;
    msgEMail(SMTP.ReadReceipt) = False;
    msgEMail(SMTP.Password) = “XXX;
    msgEMail(SMTP.Username) = “DDD”;
    msgEMail(SMTP.SMTPAuthenticate) = System.Convert.ToUInt32(XX.SMTPAuthenticate);
    msgEMail(SMTP.SMTPHost) = “smtp.domain.local”;
    msgEMail(SMTP.Subject) = “sdfgdfgd;
    msgEMail(SMTP.MessagePartsAttachments) = 2;
    Message gets suspended with the following error message.
    A message sent to adapter "SMTP" on send port "XXX_DynamicSendPort_XXXX" with URI "mailto:
    [email protected]" is suspended.
     Error details: There was a failure executing the send pipeline: "Microsoft.BizTalk.DefaultPipelines.XMLTransmit,
    Microsoft.BizTalk.DefaultPipelines, Version=3.0.1.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=81bf3856ad764e35" Source: "XML assembler" Send Port: "XXX_DynamicSendPort_XXXXX URI: "mailto:localhost" Reason: Data at the root level is invalid.
    Line 1, position 1. 
     MessageId: 
    {3C50F418-24C4-4661-9B34-4B7F5F6FBBA4}
     InstanceID: {2F6B9A0E-92EE-4953-81D2-9A124FAC99CE}
    Please can some advise me what is wrong here? do you think I have configured
    msgEMail(SMTP.SMTPHost) property correctly? Or should it be the name of the DEV box?
    Thanks
    SS
    Shiva Sadayan

    Hi Shiva,
    You should not be using XMLTransit pipeline at the send port.
    Perhaps you should go with default passthrough pipeline or
    Create a send pipeline with MIME/SMIME encoder and drop it at Encode section of pipeline. Accept the default settings for MIME/SMIME encoder and use it with the dynamic port.
    I found this article very useful while sending email from BizTalk. Refer:
    Sending Emails in Biztalk
    Rachit
    Please mark as answer or vote as helpful if my reply does

  • Changing RMI Port in HTTP adapter in interconnect

    Hi
    I need to change the RMI port for one of my HTTP adapters in Interconnect. I have changed it in the adapter.ini and in the web.xml files. I have then recreated the JAR/EAR files and redeployed the application to the oai component. The adapter starts ok but it still appears to be using the old port number and i can't send any messages to it (get a 500 Internal server error). Is there something else that needs changing?
    Cheers

    Hello,
    http://server:port/sap/xi/adapter_plain?service=<xxx>&namespace=<xxx>&interface=<xxx>&sap-user=<xxx>&sap-password=<xxx>&qos=BE&ProductID=000000000000000216&uid=500014&deviceID=0725&StoreID=0004
    In above "HTTP Post" format data has been sent in url without body of message.
    Please remember that when creating a sender/receiver using the Plain HTTP Adapter, the following are automatically filled out
    Transport Protocol: HTTP 1.0, Message Protocol: XI Payload in HTTP Body. The transport protocol means that only HTTP 1.0 is supported and that for it to work, an HTTP Body is required.
    Hope this helps,
    Mark

  • Dynamic URL for Recv HTTP (Adapter spec attribute enabled)

    Hi,
    I need to have a dynamic URL for one of my cases been worked. the URL is
    httlp://:<host>/perform/XTA?serv=*&action=start
    the event "action" can accept either start/stop or restart. i wanna to control this dynamically and went for recv http enabled with adapter specific message attributes. here i had enabled the check box "URL" and in parameter 1 i had given the name as "action".
    in my message payload the "action" will be start/stop or restart which is handled by UDF for which the code is below:l
    DynamicConfiguration conf = (DynamicConfiguration) container.getTransformationParameters().get(StreamTransformationConstants.DYNAMIC_CONFIGURATION);
    DynamicConfigurationKey trig = DynamicConfigurationKey.create( "http://sap.com/xi/XI/System/HTTP", "UrlParamOne");
    conf.put(trig,action);
    return "";
    this udf is mapped to the root node of the target...but when execute the case i get the following error
    "Dynamic Header - Missing Message Attributes: URL/HTTP Destination"
    when i execute the url
    httlp://:<host>/perform/XTA?serv=*&action=start
    in browser it works fine and also with fully qualified name in http recv works fine but not with dynamic settings.
    any help on it pls?

    Hi Prabhu,
    Enable Adapter-Specific Message Attributes(ASMA) in receiver HTTP channel.
    Dont enable checkboxes for "URL or HTTP Destination".
    Enable checkbox "Apply URL Parameters"
    for parameter1 textbox give value action
    Regards,
    Praveen Gujjeti

  • Proxy settings for dynamic ftp send port

    Does anyone have an idea how to configure the proxy settings when using a dynamic send port to connect to an ftp server?
    When using the FTP send port there is the property 'Server' to specify the proxy settings, but how would this be done with a dynamic send port?
    I can't find anything about this. And there doesn't seem to be a property
    FTP.Server according to intellisence in my orchestration.
    Kind regards,
    Mitch Vanhelden
    Blog: http://mitchvanhelden.blogspot.com

    It seems like most or all of the FTP properties are exposed in the Global Property Schemas assembly.  The FTP properties are under the "FTP" namespace (see FTP property schema below).
    One thing you might try is to get it working (simple messaging) using a static FTP send port.  Once it is working, turn on send port tracking of message properties (before and after port processing).  Inspect the tracked message for the FTP
    related properties set during static transmission and try setting these within your orchestration.
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-16"?>
    <xs:schema xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/BizTalk/2003/ftp-properties" xmlns:b="http://schemas.microsoft.com/BizTalk/2003" targetNamespace="http://schemas.microsoft.com/BizTalk/2003/ftp-properties" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
    <xs:annotation>
    <xs:appinfo>
    <b:schemaInfo schema_type="property" xmlns:b="http://schemas.microsoft.com/BizTalk/2003"/>
    </xs:appinfo>
    </xs:annotation>
    <xs:element name="RepresentationType" type="xs:string">
    <xs:annotation>
    <xs:appinfo>
    <b:fieldInfo propSchFieldBase="MessageContextPropertyBase" xmlns:b="http://schemas.microsoft.com/BizTalk/2003" propertyGuid="198b2027-4cde-4677-88f1-7b66caf6473a"/>
    </xs:appinfo>
    </xs:annotation>
    </xs:element>
    <xs:element name="SSOAffiliateApplication" type="xs:string">
    <xs:annotation>
    <xs:appinfo>
    <b:fieldInfo propSchFieldBase="MessageContextPropertyBase" xmlns:b="http://schemas.microsoft.com/BizTalk/2003" propertyGuid="8045bcbe-3285-412c-8b5a-dc3be5978c9b"/>
    </xs:appinfo>
    </xs:annotation>
    </xs:element>
    <xs:element name="UserName" type="xs:string">
    <xs:annotation>
    <xs:appinfo>
    <b:fieldInfo propSchFieldBase="MessageContextPropertyBase" xmlns:b="http://schemas.microsoft.com/BizTalk/2003" propertyGuid="6E789556-2F81-4fa6-B8E2-5214F1662289"/>
    </xs:appinfo>
    </xs:annotation>
    </xs:element>
    <xs:element name="Password" type="xs:string">
    <xs:annotation>
    <xs:appinfo>
    <b:fieldInfo propSchFieldBase="MessageContextPropertyBase" isSensitive="true" xmlns:b="http://schemas.microsoft.com/BizTalk/2003" propertyGuid="FEFD9283-C98A-470d-8E0A-C00214EE4047"/>
    </xs:appinfo>
    </xs:annotation>
    </xs:element>
    <xs:element name="BeforePut" type="xs:string">
    <xs:annotation>
    <xs:appinfo>
    <b:fieldInfo propSchFieldBase="MessageContextPropertyBase" xmlns:b="http://schemas.microsoft.com/BizTalk/2003" propertyGuid="58C0F130-2D2D-4374-8418-714A31046A58"/>
    </xs:appinfo>
    </xs:annotation>
    </xs:element>
    <xs:element name="AfterPut" type="xs:string">
    <xs:annotation>
    <xs:appinfo>
    <b:fieldInfo propSchFieldBase="MessageContextPropertyBase" xmlns:b="http://schemas.microsoft.com/BizTalk/2003" propertyGuid="CFBD9956-B0C6-48af-9257-4E27C7771998"/>
    </xs:appinfo>
    </xs:annotation>
    </xs:element>
    <xs:element name="ReceivedFileName" type="xs:string">
    <xs:annotation>
    <xs:appinfo>
    <b:fieldInfo propSchFieldBase="MessageContextPropertyBase" xmlns:b="http://schemas.microsoft.com/BizTalk/2003" propertyGuid="441B372A-23A1-4465-8329-F56AC0BDBFD8"/>
    </xs:appinfo>
    </xs:annotation>
    </xs:element>
    <xs:element name="MaxConnections" type="xs:unsignedInt">
    <xs:annotation>
    <xs:appinfo>
    <b:fieldInfo propSchFieldBase="MessageContextPropertyBase" xmlns:b="http://schemas.microsoft.com/BizTalk/2003" propertyGuid="0A580338-036A-411B-A28A-1BCC86E56458"/>
    </xs:appinfo>
    </xs:annotation>
    </xs:element>
    <xs:element name="CommandLogFileName" type="xs:string">
    <xs:annotation>
    <xs:appinfo>
    <b:fieldInfo propSchFieldBase="MessageContextPropertyBase" xmlns:b="http://schemas.microsoft.com/BizTalk/2003" propertyGuid="CCE01F9B-8869-4216-BD7A-8F476FA40327"/>
    </xs:appinfo>
    </xs:annotation>
    </xs:element>
    <xs:element name="AllocateStorage" type="xs:boolean">
    <xs:annotation>
    <xs:appinfo>
    <b:fieldInfo propSchFieldBase="MessageContextPropertyBase" xmlns:b="http://schemas.microsoft.com/BizTalk/2003" propertyGuid="4945CA1F-A812-483B-B32F-C98513EBF51E"/>
    </xs:appinfo>
    </xs:annotation>
    </xs:element>
    <xs:element name="PassiveMode" type="xs:boolean">
    <xs:annotation>
    <xs:appinfo>
    <b:fieldInfo propSchFieldBase="MessageContextPropertyBase" xmlns:b="http://schemas.microsoft.com/BizTalk/2003" propertyGuid="74B6373E-550F-4434-B2D1-DE912ACDB3A7"/>
    </xs:appinfo>
    </xs:annotation>
    </xs:element>
    <xs:element name="SpoolingFolder" type="xs:string">
    <xs:annotation>
    <xs:appinfo>
    <b:fieldInfo propSchFieldBase="MessageContextPropertyBase" xmlns:b="http://schemas.microsoft.com/BizTalk/2003" propertyGuid="1C703221-ADE1-4DF7-9D6E-1770903DC614"/>
    </xs:appinfo>
    </xs:annotation>
    </xs:element>
    <xs:element name="UseSsl" type="xs:boolean">
    <xs:annotation>
    <xs:appinfo>
    <b:fieldInfo propSchFieldBase="MessageContextPropertyBase" xmlns:b="http://schemas.microsoft.com/BizTalk/2003" propertyGuid="D032AB42-E927-470C-B5E8-E59A5E32851D"/>
    </xs:appinfo>
    </xs:annotation>
    </xs:element>
    <xs:element name="UseDataProtection" type="xs:boolean">
    <xs:annotation>
    <xs:appinfo>
    <b:fieldInfo propSchFieldBase="MessageContextPropertyBase" xmlns:b="http://schemas.microsoft.com/BizTalk/2003" propertyGuid="42E3D7F0-5FF5-4C6E-8E72-BD76D203C6DD"/>
    </xs:appinfo>
    </xs:annotation>
    </xs:element>
    <xs:element name="FtpsConnectionMode" type="xs:string">
    <xs:annotation>
    <xs:appinfo>
    <b:fieldInfo propSchFieldBase="MessageContextPropertyBase" xmlns:b="http://schemas.microsoft.com/BizTalk/2003" propertyGuid="EDA0F134-3F42-4DD7-8428-75BA65E7C4CA"/>
    </xs:appinfo>
    </xs:annotation>
    </xs:element>
    <xs:element name="ClientCertificateHash" type="xs:string">
    <xs:annotation>
    <xs:appinfo>
    <b:fieldInfo propSchFieldBase="MessageContextPropertyBase" xmlns:b="http://schemas.microsoft.com/BizTalk/2003" propertyGuid="423E6603-652E-4A61-B49F-B632031E3180"/>
    </xs:appinfo>
    </xs:annotation>
    </xs:element>
    </xs:schema>
    David Downing... If this answers your question, please Mark as the Answer. If this post is helpful, please vote as helpful.

  • Regarding encryption/decryption in sender HTTP Adapter...

    Hi experts,
              I have  a doubt that ... is there any possible ways to encrypt/decrypt the username, password  using sender side Plain HTTP adapter.
    Regards,
    Sasitharan

    hi
    You can use those adapters to define transport level security(HTTPS/FTPS) and message level security (encryption).
    hi check this thread for refernce:
    How to use the Private/Public Keys from the Key Store
    Also check this document on encryption in adpaters:
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/482aae19-0301-0010-3485-8efd618818d0
    Check security settings section of this page:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/da/7a2f41b239a831e10000000a1550b0/content.htm
    Check thiss blog as well:
    /people/varadharajan.krishnasamy/blog/2007/05/11/how-to-use-digital-certificates-for-signing-encrypting-messages-in-xi
    regards
    chandrakanth

  • Dynamic SMTP Port Error -Class not Registered

    Hi,BizTalk receiving the Invoice Message from Source and doing some transformation.After that Biztalk will send  email  dynamically via SMTP .Below is the code in message construct message assignment shape
    multipartMessage1.MessagePart_1= XMLdoc;
    multipartMessage1.MessagePart_2="This is message part2 as a string";
    multipartMessage1(SMTP.Subject) ="Email From Dynamic Port";
    multipartMessage1(SMTP.From) ="[email protected]";
    multipartMessage1(SMTP.SMTPHost) ="100.110.120.99";
    multipartMessage1.MessagePart_2(MIME.FileName) = "Attachment_Name";
    multipartMessage1(SMTP.SMTPAuthenticate) =0;
    SendInvoicePort(Microsoft.XLANGs.BaseTypes.Address)="mailto:[email protected]";
    When run the application, getting below error message.
    A message sent to adapter "SMTP" on send port "HelloWorld_1.0.0.0_Microsoft.Samples.BizTalk.HelloWorld.HelloSchedule_SendInvoicePort_d7ce16ba803d4f87"
    with URI "mailto:[email protected]" is suspended.
     Error details: Class not registered
     MessageId:  {0D6BBA1A-F384-4AD9-8B48-44A9C342DEFB}
     InstanceID: {EAFEADE1-8D05-4A7D-A908-7BC297788D06}
    After googling ,I have added
    multipartMessage1 (SMTP.EmailBodyTextCharset) = "UTF-8".but no use.
    I’ve spent many hours on this issue .Please advise how to resolve this issue

    Hi Singam,
    What is the default handler(host) configured for SMTP Adapter. Check it is 32 bit or 64 bit.
    This seems to be a known issue if Host is of 64 bit.
    Retrieving the COM class factory for component with CLSID {254B4003-2AA7-4C82-BB2E-18BA7F22DCD2} failed due to the following error: 80040154 Class not registered (Exception from HRESULT: 0x80040154 (REGDB_E_CLASSNOTREG)).
    When you use BizTalk in 64 bit version, and the Mime/Smime encoder you’ve got this error. To resolveit, just put your pipeline on a 32 bit Host.
    Mime/SMIME encoder error :
    Class not registered (Exception from HRESULT: 0×80040154 (REGDB_E_CLASSNOTREG)) 
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/7204.biztalk-server-list-of-errors-and-warnings-causes-and-solutions.aspx
    As you are using Dynamic Send Port it will run under the default host make it of 32 bit, restart the host and see if the issue is resolved or not.
    Thanks,
    Prashant
    Please mark this post accordingly if it answers your query or is helpful.

  • How to send EDI from WCF adapter to WCF service

    Hi,
    1. I have created an orchestration which is published as WCF service.
    2. I have created an orchestration which receives an XML from WCF client and process it.
    3. I have created a WCF dynamic send port.
    Problem: From this dynamic send port, I want to send EDI file to a WCF service that will receive this EDI file. How can I achieve this. Below are my concerns:
    -> For creating this WCF service, I need to know the contract of Biztalk WCF adapter which sends EDI file.
    Thanks ...

    Hi,
    How can we create WCF service to receive the EDI sent by the BTS. What contract should be used for receiving this EDI file in WCF service.
    What changes have to be made in the orchestrations to send the EDI file to the WCF send Dynamic port. Below is the code i am using.
    EDIOutboundPort(Microsoft.XLANGs.BaseTypes.Address)="URL Address";
    EDIOutboundPort(Microsoft.XLANGs.BaseTypes.TransportType)="WCF-basicHttp";
    Please correct me if i am wrong
    Thanks 
    "How can we create WCF service to receive the EDI sent by the BTS. What contract should be used for receiving this EDI file in WCF service" - This is two different questions.
    "How can we create WCF service to receive the EDI sent by the BTS"  - Using BizTalk WCF Services Publishing Wizard, the wizard would ask for the "Create BizTalk receive locations in the following application " for creating
    the receive location for the message published to the exposed WCF service. Through this receive port/location, the service would receive the message.
    In this case, I am not sure why do you want to expose the Orchestration as WCF Service when you want to send message to this Orchestration/WCF service (which after converting from Orch) through another orchestration. You could either use call/start orchestration
    to send message from one to another.
    "What contract should be used for receiving this EDI file in WCF service" - may be this question is not correct. You have created a Orchestration which you exposed as WCF service. So while creating the Orch you know the type of message this Orchestration
    is bound to, so use the same contract. Or as mentioned in my earlier reply, use "Consume WCF wizard" to consume the WCF service which would create the web message for you.
    If this answers your question please mark it accordingly. If this post is helpful, please vote as helpful by clicking the upward arrow mark next to my reply.

  • WCF static send port, use of custom behavior to change the endpoint location?

    The send port is outbound to various web service endpoints, all of which is the same WSDL just different location. Prefer to use the static port for features like ordered delivery. Is it possible to change the Microsoft.XLANGs.BaseTypes.Address dynamically
    by a custom behavior?
    https://ninithepug.wordpress.com/

    Hi,
    You can make static send ports partially dynamic, this can be achieved in a custom pipeline component in the send pipeline.
    You should refer to the below mentioned articles:
    Adding dynamic behavior to static send ports
    Using a Static Send Port like a Dynamic Send Port
    Rachit
    Please mark as answer or vote as helpful if my reply does

Maybe you are looking for

  • Change system status from PDLV to DLV

    Hi All Please help me with this error. Already tick the delivery compeleted in Goods Receipt Tab but then system status won't change from PDLV to DLV. Is there any other way wherein I could change it? Thank you Jesielle

  • Storage parition won't mount/unreadable

    I'm not sure what category to post this to, so here I am. I'm running a MacBook Pro with bootcamp with the HD paritioned for both Windows XP and Mac OS 10.4.11 and the remaining volume used for storage, scratch space and extra apps. While on the Wind

  • Production order settle

    Hi Experts, Can anybody please tell me how to know whether production order is settled or not.

  • What are the OS differences between mini, mini server and XServe?

    Hi, Apart from cpu speed disk size and memory, what are the differences between the mac mini and the mini server? What, if any, are the differences in the OS, software tools etc? Also, what are the differences between the OS in the mini, mini server

  • Parental Controls - Has anyone in the world actually made it work?

    This function has got to be the least thought out, badly implemented area of any Mac OS X operating system. To put it bluntly, it's a pile of $hit! Normally I don't complain about my macs but the parental controls are driving me up the wall. It's so