BizTalk Server Developer 2013 Vs BizTalk 2013 R2

I would like to know that if user production environment is BizTalk 2013R2.
Can I use "BizTalk Server Developer 2013" for my development? Does they compatiable?

Yes it’s possible.
BizTalk 2013 R2 support both .NET Framework 4.5 and .NET Framework 4.5.1 not just 4.5.1.
Artifacts from BizTalk 2013 are .NET 4.5 and they are compatible with BizTalk 2013 R2 environment and hence they can be deployed in BizTalk 2013 R2 – Technically it’s possible.
Refer the platform supported section in this MSDN article.
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj248703.aspx
Then the question comes, would I do this? I will not. But if you don’t have an option, you got to use BizTalk 2013 in BizTalk 2013 R2, then I can. And for future development I would use BizTalk 2013 R2 environments for BizTalk 2013 R2 deployment.
If this answers your question please mark it accordingly. If this post is helpful, please vote as helpful by clicking the upward arrow mark next to my reply.

Similar Messages

Edge Transport Server - Exchange 2013 coexistence Exchange 2007

Hi Exchange-Gurus,
We have one Exchange Org.
sub AD Domain1: A.domain.com (with Exchange 2007 SP3 R10)
sub AD Domain2: B.domain.com (with Exchange 2013 CU6); DMZ contains Exchange Transport Server - Exchange 2013
Is it possible to install within the DMZ of AD Domain1 a Edge Transport Server - Exchange 2013?
Thanks.
Guitarman

Hi Guitar,
Thank you for your question.
Is it possible to install within the DMZ of AD Domain1
an Edge Transport Server - Exchange 2013?
A: Yes, we could create an Exchange 2013 Edge server on the DMZ of AD domain1.
Notice: Before we create an EdgeSync Subscription between an Exchange 2007 Hub Transport server and an Exchange 2013 SP1 Edge Transport server, we need to install Exchange 2007 SP3
Update Rollup 13 or later on the Exchange 2007 Hub Transport server.
We could refer to the following link:
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa996719(v=exchg.150).aspx
If there are any questions regarding this issue, please be free to let me know.
Best Regard,
Jim

Upgrade from SQL server developer 2008 R2 to SQL Server developer 2012

Hi,
We have bought 5 licenses of SQL server developer 2012.
This licenses provided us an option to use SQL server 2008 R2. And we have been using 2008 R2 till now.
But now we want to upgrade to SQL server developer 2012 edition
I want to know the process for up-gradation. When I looked at the licensing portal, it says "This product does not require a product key"
My questions are:
1) Should I download the 2012 version from licensing center and pass the downloaded copy to respective team members?
2) Can the team member download the SQL server 2012 developer edition from Microsoft site and install it on their machines?
3) Do we need to first un-install 2008 R2?
4) How the licensing can be managed in cases of products which say "This product does not require a product key.", i.e. how can I make sure that no more than 5 installations are done by the team
Thanks

Hi,
We have bought 5 licenses of SQL server developer 2012.
This licenses provided us an option to use SQL server 2008 R2. And we have been using 2008 R2 till now.
But now we want to upgrade to SQL server developer 2012 edition
I want to know the process for up-gradation. When I looked at the licensing portal, it says "This product does not require a product key"
My questions are:
1) Should I download the 2012 version from licensing center and pass the downloaded copy to respective team members?
2) Can the team member download the SQL server 2012 developer edition from Microsoft site and install it on their machines?
3) Do we need to first un-install 2008 R2?
4) How the licensing can be managed in cases of products which say "This product does not require a product key.", i.e. how can I make sure that no more than 5 installations are done by the team
Thanks
1. Developer edition has license associated with it .And yes you can download it if you have subscription.But please be informed that you cannot use Developer edition in production,its not allowed and illegal.
2.You can upgarde from SQL server 2008 R2 to 2012 developer edition by Inplace upgrade method ,you can also follow side by side approach.For side by side approach you have to get new box ,intall OS,then install SQL server 2012 ,move logins and jobs and move
databases by backup restore.You must see supported upgrades
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms143393(v=sql.110).aspx
3.No not ins any case ,please dont do that
4.Licensing question should best be asked with Microsoft licensing expert.
reg process of upgarde first run upgrade advisor and look for error if any.Then run SQL server 2012 setup and in maintenance section select edition upgrade,other process is same as SQL Server installtion
http://www.mssqltips.com/sqlservertip/2505/version-and-edition-upgrades-with-sql-server-2008-r2/
Please mark this reply as the answer or vote as helpful, as appropriate, to make it useful for other readers

Where is "Sun ONE Application Server Developer's Guide to Clients"

Hi All,
"Sun ONE Application Server 7 Developer's Guide " refers
"Sun ONE Application Server Developer's Guide to Clients" many times. But I can not find it. Where is it?
Thanks.

I would also like to know where to find the "Developer's Guide to J2EE Features and Services" ?
Kind regards, Johann

How to install SSIS on SQL Server Developer

I have SQL Server Developer. I know I can add in SSIS. Can you tell me the steps to install SSIS on my machine?
Knowledge is the only thing that I can give you, and still retain, and we are both better off for it.

Hi ryguy72,
Based on my research, in the version of SQL Server 2014, SSDT BI is no longer included in setup. If we require Integration Services design-time features, we must also install SQL Server Data Tools (SSDT). Installs Microsoft SQL Server Data Tools Business
Intelligence project templates for Analysis Services, Integration Services, and Reporting Services that support Visual Studio 2012.
Please download and install Microsoft SQL Server Data Tools - Business Intelligence for Visual Studio 2012 from there:
http://www.microsoft.com/en-in/download/details.aspx?id=36843
Thanks,
Katherine Xiong
Katherine Xiong
TechNet Community Support

Oracle WebLogic Server Development Prebuilt VM: 64 bit or 32 bit?

Hi,
This is a question regarding "Oracle WebLogic Server Development" Prebuilt Virtualbox VM available for download here - http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/middleware/weblogic/downloads/weblogic-developer-vm-303434.html . Its description simply mentions that it has Oracle Linux 5.5 as the guest OS, but does not indicate what type of guest processor - 64-bit or 32-bit. Can someone who has tried it out please check this out and confirm?
Thanks!

Downloaded and got it running - it is 32-bit Linux.

Can I Install SQL Server Developer Edition 2012 on Windows 8

I am just about to buy this:
http://www.amazon.com/SQL-Server-Developer-Edition-2012/dp/B007RFXQAM
I noticed that the 2 platforms listed are Windows 7 & Vista. I'm pretty sure it will also run fine on Windows 8, based on what I read here:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms143506.aspx
I'm wondering if anyone has actually installed SQL Server Developer Edition 2012 on Windows 8.
Thanks!!
Ryan Shuell

Yes, absolutely. It is fully compatible and supported. And you already have the official link :)
This posting is provided “AS IS” with no warranties, and confers no rights.
If this reply answers your question, please mark it as Answered for others to find it easily.
If this reply help you resolving the problem, please vote the post as Helpful.

SSIS - SQL Server Developer to Express Edition

Hi,
Does anyone know if it is possible to use SQL Server Developer Edition to produce SSIS packages that will operate on a remote SQL Server Express Edition database?
The situation is such that it is easiest to install a SQL Server Express Edition database on a remote server (for use within a company intranet) due to server availability and licensing restrictions. It would be great to be able to do Excel round trips with the data though - would it be possible to use SQL Server Developer Edition to do this on another computer, and have it update the data in the Express database?
Thank you for your time.
Kind Regards,
Ray Muirhead

SQL Server Express Edition does not contain SSIS, and you cannot execute SSIS packages on a box with Express Edition. However, you can read/write to an Express edition without any limitation.

Biztalk Server Developer Edition Image in Azure

Hi,
All of my Biztalk 2013R2 machines (based on the Developer Edition image) has stopped working. SQL Server Evaluation period expired. What can I do to fix this? Apart from buying SQL Server.. ;)
This also occurs on a fresh virtual machine created today.

Hi There,
I was wondering if there has been update to this. Its been over a week and I can't find any solutions to this?
Also I realised as an msdn ultimate customer I still can't actually raise an Azure Technical support call and have to rely on the forums unless I pay more for Azure support. Very frustrating. 3 people in my organisation are impacted by this on
a brand new Azure based project and it is a little concerning.
The gallery image seemed the best thing since as I understand it, msdn ultimate covers our licensing of the Developer editions. Had I known the SQL would have expired even though I can legally license it with my msdn subscription I would never had
gone down this route and would have started with the base OS image and installed the software on top of this.
Any advice here would be very much appreciated.
Cheers
Stephen

MSDN version to access Biztalk server development/test?

In what MSDN version is access to BizTalk dev./test server included? and is there any difference if its a cloud install or not?
Ultimate?
Premium?
Pro?
Std.?
Thank you!

For BizTalk Server, you need minimum of "Visual Studio Premium with MSDN" (Or also unofficially termed as MSDN Premium).
Development for MABS (Microsoft Azure BizTalk Services) can happen using on-premise Visual studio, but to deploy and used them on cloud, you need to pay for the Azure storage and usage credit. With "Visual Studio Premium with MSDN" license you
will get $100 monthly credit and with Visual Studio Ultimate with MSDN license you will get $150 monthly credit. This credit is something like "use it or lose it" type. i.e. monthly you have been given with the money credit, if you don't use it you
lose that month's Azure credit. Next month you will get new credit, last month's credit will not be carried forward.
To know more about the license, check the following page (click Compare benefits link)
http://www.visualstudio.com/en-us/products/msdn-subscriptions-vs#AdditionalPageSections_1
If this answers your question please mark it accordingly. If this post is helpful, please vote as helpful by clicking the upward arrow mark next to my reply.

Connecting Visual Studio 2008 to Team Foundation Server 2012/2013

I currently have many projects in VS 2008.
We are able to build and deliver all of the products to the production servers.
I want to connect VS2008 to VisualStudio.com so I can create an environment for Beta Testing with VisualStudio.com and Azure.
I have started from scratch:
Build a VMWare Virtual Machine - Windows 7 Ultimate
Added all of the Windows Updates
I installed Visual Studio 2008 - Professional
I updated Visual Studio 2008 to SP1
I have installed VS2008 Team Explorer
Unable to install GDR2 - with message "Visual Studio Team System 2008 Database Edition GDR does not apply, or is blocked by another condition on your system. '
I attempted to follow the "more information" instructions but there were no previous version to uninstall.
I attempted to login to Team Foundation Server (https://nnnnnn.visualstudio.com/DefaultCollection) and receive the "TF31002: Unable to connect to ....
I am able to login to the visualstudio.com site without any issue.
I have been working on this for days and no matter what I have read and tried, I cannot seem to get past this point.
I tried using a laptop I have and did the same steps as above with the same results.
It is obvious I am missing a step or that this process is longer possible.
Anyone have any suggestions?
Is there a "support" number that might help me resolve this?

Hi Zanyfrong,
Thanks for your post.
To using VS 2008 connect to TFS 2012/2013 or VSO, please install components follow the below order:
Visual Studio 2008
Visual Studio 2008 SP1
Team Explorer 2010
Visual Studio 2010 SP1
Visual Studio 2010 GDR
Microsoft MSSCCI Provider for Visual Studio 2010
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

Office web Apps server Lync 2013 Certificate

Hi,
I'll be installing Office web app (OWA) server with Lync 2013 std edition. External users access is disabled but federation is enabled, mean OWA will be exposed to internet as wabweb.contoso.com, the interal host name of OWA server is owa.contoso.local
Does the certificate on the on OWA server need to have owa.contoso.local and certificate principle name and wabweb.contoso.com as SAN? or only owa.contoso.local is enough?

It really depends on how you publish the server to the internet. You have some options. If you are publishing this via a reverse proxy, internally you would have a private cert with .local on it and the public name on the reverse proxy. If you are
punching a firewall hole/NAT directly to the server your best option is to use a public cert on that server directly.
That all said, personally I like to make both the internal and external farm URL the same, and use a public cert on the server (if no reverse proxy is in play). So I would actually enter the OWAS Farm as wabweb.contoso.com in topology builder, than
when creating the farm via PowerShell make that both the internal and external URL and get a certificate with a single name on it of wabweb.contoso.com.
Richard
Richard Brynteson, Lync MVP | http://masteringlync.com | http://lyncvalidator.com

Office Web Apps Server June 2013 Cumulative Update Excel Freeze Pane and Hide/Un-hide Feature Missing

Hi,
I have recently updated the Office Web Apps Server to the June 2013 Cumulative Update (KB2817350) which was published with the new features that allow rendering of freeze pane, hide/un-hide the excel worksheet and row/columns, Header
Row Snapping, Sorting, Data Validation and Autocomplete. i have followed the TechNet article (http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj966220.aspx)
to update the office web apps server. Current setup is a SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012 and Office Web Apps server. All server are installed on Windows server 2012.
3vild3vil

Hi,
Sorry to inform you that these new features are specific to cloud Excel Web App in both SkyDrive and Office365. There is no update available for on-premise Excel Web Apps installed locally
yet. Thank you for your understanding.
http://blogs.office.com/b/microsoft-excel/archive/2013/06/26/we-ve-updated-excel-web-app-what-s-new-as-of-june-2013.aspx
Miles LI TechNet Community Support

Server Exchange 2013 SP1 installation on Hyper-V server

Dear colleges, I seek your help with ExchangeServer 2013 installation on a Hyper-V server issue I've been having.
Getting below errors during prerequisites check of XCHG SVR installation. Installation is done on a Hyper-V server. This server is member of a domain. I have also promoted this server to a Active Directory Domain Controller. In other words there's 2 AD DC
- one is on the main server and the other on this one. The user the installation is run under has ALL required access rights. Please advise as this issue is getting on my nerves. I believe something is wrong setup on a AD DC part. Please suggest what to check
and post on the forum, so somebody can just point out what I am doing wrong.
Error:
The Active Directory schema isn't up-to-date, and this user account isn't a member of the 'Schema Admins' and/or 'Enterprise Admins' groups.
For more information, visit: http://technet.microsoft.com/library(EXCHG.150)/ms.exch.setupreadiness.SchemaUpdateRequired.aspx
Error:
Global updates need to be made to Active Directory, and this user account isn't a member of the 'Enterprise Admins' group.
For more information, visit: http://technet.microsoft.com/library(EXCHG.150)/ms.exch.setupreadiness.GlobalUpdateRequired.aspx
Error:
You must be a member of the 'Organization Management' role group or a member of the 'Enterprise Admins' group to continue.
For more information, visit: http://technet.microsoft.com/library(EXCHG.150)/ms.exch.setupreadiness.GlobalServerInstall.aspx
Error:
You must use an account that's a member of the Organization Management role group to install or upgrade the first Mailbox server role in the topology.
For more information, visit: http://technet.microsoft.com/library(EXCHG.150)/ms.exch.setupreadiness.DelegatedBridgeheadFirstInstall.aspx
Error:
You must use an account that's a member of the Organization Management role group to install or upgrade the first Mailbox server role in the topology.
For more information, visit: http://technet.microsoft.com/library(EXCHG.150)/ms.exch.setupreadiness.DelegatedMailboxFirstInstall.aspx
Error:
You must use an account that's a member of the Organization Management role group to install or upgrade the first Client Access server role in the topology.
For more information, visit: http://technet.microsoft.com/library(EXCHG.150)/ms.exch.setupreadiness.DelegatedClientAccessFirstInstall.aspx
Error:
You must use an account that's a member of the Organization Management role group to install the first Mailbox server role in the topology.
For more information, visit: http://technet.microsoft.com/library(EXCHG.150)/ms.exch.setupreadiness.DelegatedUnifiedMessagingFirstInstall.aspx
Error:
Setup encountered a problem while validating the state of Active Directory: Couldn't find the Enterprise Organization container. See the Exchange setup log for more information on this error.
For more information, visit: http://technet.microsoft.com/library(EXCHG.150)/ms.exch.setupreadiness.AdInitErrorRule.aspx
Error:
The forest functional level of the current Active Directory forest is not Windows Server 2003 native or later. To install Exchange Server 2013, the forest functional level must be at least Windows Server 2003 native.
For more information, visit: http://technet.microsoft.com/library(EXCHG.150)/ms.exch.setupreadiness.ForestLevelNotWin2003Native.aspx
Error:
Either Active Directory doesn't exist, or it can't be contacted.
For more information, visit: http://technet.microsoft.com/library(EXCHG.150)/ms.exch.setupreadiness.CannotAccessAD.aspx
Warning:
Installing Exchange Server on a domain controller will elevate the permissions for Exchange Trusted Subsystem to domain administrators.
For more information, visit: http://technet.microsoft.com/library(EXCHG.150)/ms.exch.setupreadiness.WarningInstallExchangeRolesOnDomainController.aspx
Warning:
Setup will prepare the organization for Exchange 2013 by using 'Setup /PrepareAD'. No Exchange 2007 server roles have been detected in this topology. After this operation, you will not be able to install any Exchange 2007 servers.
For more information, visit: http://technet.microsoft.com/library(EXCHG.150)/ms.exch.setupreadiness.NoE12ServerWarning.aspx
Warning:
Setup will prepare the organization for Exchange 2013 by using 'Setup /PrepareAD'. No Exchange 2010 server roles have been detected in this topology. After this operation, you will not be able to install any Exchange 2010 servers.
For more information, visit:

Got the same errors when ran on the main AD DC server:
Microsoft Windows [Version 6.2.9200]
(c) 2012 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
C:\Windows\system32>setup /ps /iacceptexchangeserverlicenseterms
'setup' is not recognized as an internal or external command,
operable program or batch file.
C:\Windows\system32>h:
H:\>setup /ps /iacceptexchangeserverlicenseterms
Welcome to Microsoft Exchange Server 2013 Service Pack 1 Unattended Setup
Copying Files...
File copy complete. Setup will now collect additional information needed for
installation.
Performing Microsoft Exchange Server Prerequisite Check
Prerequisite Analysis FAILED
The Active Directory schema isn't up-to-date, and this user account isn't a
member of the 'Schema Admins' and/or 'Enterprise Admins' groups.
For more information, visit: http://technet.microsoft.com/library(EXCHG.150
)/ms.exch.setupreadiness.SchemaUpdateRequired.aspx
Setup encountered a problem while validating the state of Active Directory:
Couldn't find the Enterprise Organization container. See the Exchange setup lo
g for more information on this error.
For more information, visit: http://technet.microsoft.com/library(EXCHG.150
)/ms.exch.setupreadiness.AdInitErrorRule.aspx
The forest functional level of the current Active Directory forest is not W
indows Server 2003 native or later. To install Exchange Server 2013, the forest
functional level must be at least Windows Server 2003 native.
For more information, visit: http://technet.microsoft.com/library(EXCHG.150
)/ms.exch.setupreadiness.ForestLevelNotWin2003Native.aspx
Either Active Directory doesn't exist, or it can't be contacted.
For more information, visit: http://technet.microsoft.com/library(EXCHG.150
)/ms.exch.setupreadiness.CannotAccessAD.aspx
The Exchange Server setup operation didn't complete. More details can be found
in ExchangeSetup.log located in the <SystemDrive>:\ExchangeSetupLogs folder.
H:\>

Send As, Send on Behalf and Full Access for Exchange server 2010/2013

[This FAQ contains 2 parts]
Testing and watching the behavior of Send As, Send On Behalf and Full Access permission.
Common issue and Troubleshooting on the three permission.
[Testing and Watching]
Based on following blog, I decide to test on my lab:
Full Mailbox Access Rights + Send On Behalf = Send As ?
http://blogs.technet.com/b/ehlro/archive/2012/04/06/full-mailbox-access-rights-send-on-behalf-send-as.aspx
Description on my lab and test:
Exchange 2010 + Outlook 2010
Exchange 2013 + Outlook 2013
Senders: A01, A02, … , A07, A08
Recipient: A09
A01 grand permission to other senders.
Two methods:
a. Use A0x’s credential configure A01’s profile, then send From both A01 and A0x via Outlook. Watching result in A09’s Inbox and Sent Items which has message copy left.
b. Use A0x’s credential configure A0x’s profile, then send From both A01 and A0x via Outlook. Watching result in A09’s Inbox and Sent Items which has message copy left.
Result as following forms:
1. Exchange 2010 + Outlook 2010 / Exchange 2013 + Outlook 2013
Using A0x’s credential configure A01’s mailbox, then send From both A01 and A0x
To A09.
2. Exchange 2010 + Outlook 2010 / Exchange 2013 + Outlook 2013
Using A0x’s credential configure A0x’s mailbox, then send From both A01 and A0x
To A09.
[Common Issue]
1. [Issue]
Exchange 2010 + Outlook 2010. A01 grand A03 Send As permission. However A03 can’t send as A01 to A09 and get NDR:
You can’t send a message on behalf of this user unless you have permission to do so. Please make sure you’re sending on behalf of the correct sender, or request the necessary permission. If the problem continues, please contact your helpdesk.
Details as following pic:
[Troubleshooting]
1) Based on the NDR, it seems a permission issue. Check Send As permission, however the Send As permission configured correctly. Pic as below:
2) ince the Send As permission configured correctly, it seems the permission hasn’t been replicated. Try to restart Microsoft Exchange Information Store service. It works.
Note: The Send As permission isn’t granted until after replication has occurred. Replication times depend on your Exchange and network configuration. To grant the permission immediately, stop and then restart the Microsoft Exchange Information
Store service.
2. [Issue]
Exchange 2013 + Outlook 2013. A01 grand A03 Send As permission. However A03 can’t send as A01 to A09 and get NDR:
Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.
Subject: xxx
Sent: xx/xx/2014 8:20 AM
The following recipient(s) cannot be reached: A09
This message could not be sent. Try sending the message again later, or contact your network administrator. Error is [0x80070005-00000000-00000000].
Details as below:
[Troubleshooting]
1) Also check the Send As permission configuration first.
2) Then try to use A03 send as A01 to A09 via OWA. If OWA works well, it seems and issue on the Outlook client side.
3) This behavior may occur if the OAB in Outlook isn’t updated. Try to download OAB manually.
4) If doesn’t work, please close Outlook and try to delete all the OAB folder on your computer. The path of OAB folder in Win7, Win8 as below:
\Users\<UserName>\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Outlook\Offline Address Books
5) Restart Outlook.
Note: Be aware that you cannot send e-mail messages on behalf of a mailbox if the mailbox is hidden from address list. When sending a message, Exchange requires that e-mail address is resolved in the
From field.
3. [Issue]
Exchange 2010. A01 grant A0x “Send As” or “Send on Behalf” permission. A0x send as/ send on behalf of A01. The message is only copied to the Sent Items folder in A0x’s mailbox (same as the result of my test). Also cannot configure Exchange 2010 so that the
message is copied to the Sent Items folder of both A01 and A0x.
[Troubleshooting]
This issue occurs because Exchange server 2010 was designed to copy message to the Sent Items folder of the sender only. This issue can be solved by installing Exchange 2010 SP2 UR4. More details in the following KB:
Messages that are sent by using the "Send As" and "Send on behalf" permissions are copied only to the Sent Items folder of the sender in an Exchange Server 2010 environment
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2632409/en-us
Please click to vote if the post helps you. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.

Nice guide Mavis, I recently explored the same topic. Few things you might want to add is the type of connectivity (Cached vs Online will produce different results) and to expand further on the methods of adding the other mailbox in Outlook (additional mailbox
vs additional account defaults to different methods). Check the screenshot:
And please post this somewhere more visible, like blog/wiki page.

BizTalk Server Developer 2013 Vs BizTalk 2013 R2

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for