Block all GR and SES

Hi
I have a requirement where i have to block the goods receipt (GR) & Service entry sheet (SES) for a particular period say 2 weeks (15th dec to 1st jan 2010) for a particular company code
Kindly advice the customisation process
Regards
Prasanna Patil
Edited by: PRASANNA JANARDHAN RAO on Dec 2, 2009 4:46 PM

one option is to do a mass change with MEMASSPO at table EKPO and enter a S into field deletion indicator.
alternative an my preferred one is to close the posting period in OB52.

Similar Messages

I want to block all cookies and this option does not appear under the 'options' and 'security' tabs. It seems to have disappeared. What can I do?

I followed the instructions from your website on how to block all co9kies and i did not work. You used to have a simple menu for blocking and unblocking cookies, which seems to have disappeared. If I can't block cookies, then I will have to use another browser where I can. Thanks for your help.

To see all the History and Cookie settings, select:
* Tools > Options > Privacy > History: Firefox will: "Use custom settings for history"
See also:
*https://support.mozilla.com/kb/Cookies
* http://kb.mozillazine.org/Cookies

Cisco SA520 - Unable to block all torrents and Poor Performance

Hi, I have installed a Cisco SA520W Appliance at a Client who has about 40-50 PC's, the device has the latest firmware 2.1.7 and latest IPS signature (17) installed, the client is quite disappointed about the performance of the device as he believes Internet browsing access has slowed down substantially.
The main problem the client is encountering is that, he is unable to block Utorrent P2P software and this is not allowing him to retain Internet control from the SA520 appliance.
He had also commented on the fact that there does not appear to be a status monitor on IP usage of Internet access to pinpoint who at that time would be hogging up the bandwidth.
Any feedback, same encounters scenarios and possible fixes to the above issues would be appreciated.
Thanks
Shawn

You might find this thread interesting regarding the router's performance with IPS turned on. An SA540, and an access point, would yield slightly better performance. That's what we use.
https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/2022832?tstart=60
There are some older threads regarding the SA500 series router's ability to detect torrent activity. You might want to dig them up and respond to them. The Cisco folks were working diligently at optimizing the IPS engine's ability to detect different types of torrent activity.
There is no way to monitor Internet access usage at the individual IP level that I am aware of. I suggest turning on network logging (to a syslog server as there will be a lot of data to capture) and monitor traffic that way. Kiwi Syslog Server has a free version that your client could use.
http://www.solarwinds.com/register/kiwi_registration.aspx?Program=874&c=70150000000EIV7

Lion os 10.7.5 blocks ALL (firefox and thunderbird) automatic update s narrowly Firefox 30.0 is there a work around?

Since firefox was installed, no auto updates are take place when the frequent "UPDATE AVAILABLE - A security and stability update for Firefox is available:
Firefox 30.0
It is strongly recommended that you apply this update for Firefox as soon as possible." pop up on the screen.
WHEN "Update Firefox" button is clicked authorized a bar indicates running however never completes an installation. This routinely occurs with both firefox and thunderbird, on Mac Mini Server, and MacBook Air, each running latest version of Lion. Are you able to assist troubleshoot?

If there are problems with updating or with the permissions then best is to download the full version and trash the currently installed version to do a clean install of the new version.
Download a new copy of the Firefox application and save the disk image file to the desktop
*Firefox 30.0: http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/all.html
*Trash the current Firefox application (open the Applications folder in the Finder and drag the Firefox application to the Trash) to do a clean (re)install
*Install the new version that you have downloaded
*https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Installing+Firefox+on+Mac
Your personal data is stored elsewhere in the Firefox profile folder, so you won't lose your bookmarks and other personal data when you uninstall and (re)install Firefox.
*http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_folder_-_Firefox

JFileChooser blocks all JFrames

I believe something like this was asked before already, but I could not find a satisfactory solution.
Situation:
I have X JFrames open. Each frame has a "Browse" button and a "New Window" button, and some content like an image or text. Clicking "Browse" opens a new JFileChooser, and "New Window" opens a new JFrame like all the others.
Problem:
Whenever I click "Browse" in one of the JFrames, I cannot interact with ANY JFrame until the JFileChooser is closed. Clicking buttons has no effect, and no ActionEvents are delivered to either parent window or other windows. Similarly, if the program cannot open the file chosen it displays an error dialog which behaves in exactly the same way, blocking all windows and not just the parent window like would be logical and acceptable.
Failed solution:
In the beginning of the actionPerformed method I start a new thread to actually handle the ActionEvent. I have verified that the actionPerformed method finishes before the JFileChooser is closed, so I know the opening of the filechooser is not blocking the event dispatching thread. I also ran the SwingUtilities check to see whether the JFileChooser opening was running in the event dispatching thread and the result was false.
As far as I can see everything should be ok, but still all my JFrames remain blocked if any of them opens up a JFileChooser or a message window.
Can anyone help?

The dialog created by JFileChooser.showOpenDialog() is made modal
on purpose, so that the return value can be retrieved in a single
threaded flow without having to set listeners etc.
You can embed a JFileChooser in your own JDialog and not make it
modal if you want to. Add a PropertyChangeListener to catch the
APPROVE_SELECTION and CANCEL_SELECTION events, or override
the approveSelection() and cancelSelection() methods.
Leif Samuelsson
Java Swing Team
Sun Microsystems, Inc.

ACLs on Dot11Radio interface blocks ALL traffic

On an AP1220 w/IOS 12.2(11)JA1, all traffic is blocked when an ACL is applied on either the RF interface or the FastE interface, even explicitly permitted traffic. Also, using the "log" command after an ACL line fails to log anything. Below is the ACL I want to apply to the Dot11Radio 0 interface. It blocks ALL traffic:
access-list 100 permit udp any any eq bootpc log
access-list 100 permit tcp any host 10.0.0.1 eq 1723 log
access-list 100 permit gre any host 10.0.0.1 log
access-list 100 deny ip any any log
Here is a test ACL that blocked ALL traffic, as well:
access-list 101 permit udp any any log
access-list 101 permit tcp any any log
access-list 101 permit icmp any any log
access-list 101 permit ip any any log
Both ACLs blocked all traffic and failed to log a single event. If the ACL is removed, everything works. HELP!

It's a known bug CSCec28612 - AP1200 access-list doesnt work on radio int with a log keyword

Do you have an option for block all incoming message and request EXCEPTED messages from my contacts?

Please help!!To whom it may concernDear Madam/Sir who works for Skype & Microsoft Dear all who can really help, Do you have an option for block all incoming message and request EXCEPTED messages from my contacts? or Do you have any solution to solve my problem from begin to now in present time? Even though, I set the Privacy settings: - Allow calls from... "people in my Contact list only"- Automatically received video and share screens with "people in my Contact list only"- Allow IMs from "people in my Contact list only" I still received unknow users sent me messages in every day, contact requests etc. And they're all clearly spammings and identity thefts. I only wanna contact with my family and my freinds here with Skype via my Windows device and my mobile phone (w/Android OS). And this is the only way to contact with them, because they could use Skype only in overseas. BUT I don't need new friend from other unknow Skype member. I keep blocked all unknow spammers in every day. However in this morning, I feel so scared with Skype on my mobile, I looked at my mobile Skype, I saw it automatically showed me the list of all blocked members. BUT they were all unblocked (contact unblocked) by my mobile (Android version) Skype itself automatically, and listed them one by one on the screen, and about 30 seconds later, they all were disappeared suddenly. I don't know what do to now, is it indicating my account was hacked?And how could I found out all those members again and block them again and delete all of them for ever? I appreciate if you would improve the privacy protection. Thank you very very very much.

Hrm... that may be true and this may be a function of the phone email client that Apple just doesn't do.
No, I can easily MANUALLY delete the messages. I would prefer if I didn't have to do it twice, tho. Once on the mail server and once on the phone.
What I think the phone needs to do is, when it checks the POP, anything NOT there should be removed locally. I think you are correct on POP; the phone will poll the mx (mail exchanger) and the mx will pass off the messages to the phone. The phone then keeps ALL of that unitl you manually delete it.
If, say, I remove a message from the mx, I would like the phone, when next polls, to see that that particular message isn't on the server anymore and remove it locally.
Perhaps it's just me but if I delete the message on the mx itself, via my ISP's webmail interface, I really don't want to have to remove it again from my phone.
thxs!
cheers
rOot

How to create a new rule in Windows Firewall to permit some specific IPs and block all other computers

Hello,
I have a Win7 PC. I want to block all incoming connections except 3 or 4 IPs. How can i do this?
I created a new rule to block all connections using this steps:
Inbound rules > New Rule > Custom > All Programs > All Protocols / Ports > All Local/Remote IPs > Block the connectiion > All profiles > Then i gave a name
This rule works fine and blocks all incoming connections.
Then i want to create a new rule to allow specific IPs using this steps:
Inbound rules > New Rule > Custom > All Programs > All Protocols / Ports > Remote IPs: 192.168.10.5, 192.168.10.10 > Allow the connection > All profiles > Then i gave a name
But 192.168.10.5 and 192.168.10.10 couldn't reach W7 machine.
(If rules are disabled or FW is off; both IPs could reach W7 machine)
Thanks

Hi,
How did you check these two IP address? Through remote access? According to your description, it should only allow remote IP could access this computer. Please also allow local IP for test.
Roger Lu
TechNet Community Support

How to block all authomatic updates of firefox itself and plugins and also requests to update??

I would like to have a stable browser with the extensions I selected. I like Firefox for being highly customizable and for a huge choice of extensions written by volunteers not working for Mozilla.
Since none of support seems to be able to understand the problem (or is instructed not to understand), I feel that I need precede my request by an explanation, which is inevitably fairly long. I need to explain why the standard suggestions by support are not acceptable.
Unfortunately, every new version of Mozilla made the visual customization of the GUI (i.e. a complete theme; probably, they were called skins before) used by me not working. The versions 18 and higher are compatible with only one (complete) theme suitable for me. For me, you reduced the choice to just two options: the default GUI, which I personally cannot stand at all, and one more. And the second one may disappear at any time. I was under impression that the people at Mozilla do understand that different people may have different tastes (and that this is good), in contrast with the people at Google who are, apparently, do not. It turned out that I was wrong.
Still, it was possible to check the option "do not install upgrades" and keep the version you liked. Then Mozilla changed this and the updates started to be installed without consent of the user. This is something far beyond my comprehension. The option "do not install" turned into an outright deception. I doubt that this is legal even if this is hidden in the small print somewhere.
The Mozilla support was not helpful at all with this type of problems and took a cavalier approach to all who asked: “We know better what you need”. Fortunately, somebody posted a solution, or, rather, a hack allowing to get rid of automatic upgrades. Note that this hack is for moderately advanced users only, and, being a hack, it may not work with future versions.
More or less simultaneously the problem with plug-ins appeared. The first major sign was the impossibility to watch the YouTube videos. The other plug-ins followed. Now I am unable to open without a hassle a PDF document downloaded even from a government site, not to say about reputable libraries (and the files were created by libraries themselves by scanning, or by Google), or files created by my friends whom I definitely trust much more than Mozilla.
Again, Mozilla support is of no help at all. Moreover, they post derogatory remarks about users complaining about these issues and trying to intimidate them. The support may go as far as to suggest upgrading Firefox to version 23 as a solution to the problem of keeping version 3 without constant hassles. This is an insult. Moreover, when I posted a couple of remarks in the thread https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/971139#answer-498622, the thread was almost immediately closed by Tylerdowner, top 10 contributor, administrator, moderator. This is a serious abuse, but the buttons to report this disappeared. How he got his titles? This guy is guilty of abuse and should be banned from all forums.
Dear Tylerdowner, the-edmeister and others. Please, try to understand a couple of basic ideas.
First, my computer is my computer, and you have absolutely no right to change it without my consent. I will take of its security myself. The owners of other computers will take care of their security themselves. There are a lot of tools dealing with security; and I don’t know anybody without at least one. This is the first basic principle.
The second idea has nothing to do with my privacy and Mozilla’s invasion of my privacy. It is not hard to realize that Mozilla is not the only software I am using, and even not the only browser. You do not control the rest. No matter what you do, the computer may be infected in other ways. If your browser is not allowing me to watch a video, I copy-paste the URL in another one and watch it there, and this is not the only other way to watch it. Even if your concerns about the security are sincere (I don’t believe that they are; they are too mechanical and repetitive), blocking something in Mozilla is futile. The result of your behavior will be the abandonment of Mozilla by more and more users, the process already going on.
Finally, here are my requests.
1. I and other users need a simple extension for Firefox written by Mozilla (not by
volunteers) and allowing to disable all updates in one-two clicks and disable all monitoring of plug-ins and anything else which may be present in the user’s computer. Of course, there should be an option to reenable these features. It should be a couple of buttons in the Options window, or in a separate pop-up window and have simple GUI. Of course, it should work as described, which is not the case for the Options window now. No hacks, no changes in about:config, no renaming or moving of files, etc. I appreciate everybody who made such suggestions. One of them allowed me to get rid of updates without my consent. It remains to see if the suggestion in the mentioned thread can solve my problem with plug-ins; as of now, it works for me only partially. But such thing should be done by Mozilla.
2. It would be great if the software engineers at Mozilla will learn (relearn?) the concept of the backward compatibility. More specifically, the Mozilla should prepare every new release or update in such a way that all (I mean this literally, all) extensions and themes posted on the Mozilla site will be still working after the update. The volunteers don’t have time to keep up with the constant updates, and many authors of very good extensions already stopped to support them.
3. Do not release a new version if you are not sure that it is bugs-free. Then there will be no need in updates between the versions (by a version I mean Firefox numbered by an integer without dots). Perhaps, this is incompatible with the current release schedule. The abandoning of this crazy schedule is the easiest thing to do; only a desire to do this is needed.

Dear feer56,
First, I have to repeat: every new Firefox version was not compatible with many old themes. I do realize that I am, probably, especially unlucky – my favorite theme was always disabled. Still, it is not an accident that Mozilla tried to eliminate the complete themes completely and replace them by some pictures: the list of themes turned into a cemetery of not compatible themes. I just checked: out of 496 complete themes no more than 40 are compatible with Firefox 22. I don’t have any newer version.
Please, do not attribute to me the idea of including all the themes into the basic browser download. I did not suggest anything like this. I suggested caring about the backward compatibility.
Of course, I followed your steps 1-5 quite a while ago. But in Summer of 2012 Mozilla started to ignore these preferences. Firefox downloaded new version in the background, and next time you open the browser, it upgrades itself before you even realize what is going on. There was no way to interrupt this process. Even if firefox.exe was terminated through the tasks manager in Windows, it first completed the update, and only then closed.
I never saw any step by step instructions to deal with this problem. I just searched the Mozilla site for “disable automatic updates, and the first two pages of results deal with enabling updates. Eventually, one gets to disabling at https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/966835?esab=a&s=disable+automathic+updates&r=18&as=s . One of the top 10 contributors suggests switching to Firefox for IT professionals, and then deal with this problem only once a year. Or to follow steps 1-5 above. In the case it will not work, he suggests looking at an irrelevant article. He should know and I am sure that he knows that the problem is not with not saving preferences by a mistake; the problem is that Firefox ignores them now by design. Eventually this was admitted by somebody.
Changing about:config is not an easy task. The meaning of most entries is unclear, the modifications suggested by somebody turned out to be not sufficient. This is also a task for IT professionals.
I said nothing about the competence of Tyler. He is arrogant; this is a completely different matter. He may use his competence at some place where he will not need to interact with customers.
“If you do not like what Mozilla is doing and rather be tracked and rather be followed, please use Google Chrome. We're all here to help you.”
Do you mean that it is better to be tracked by Mozilla than by Google? As I learned yesterday, Firefox compares daily the software installed on my computer with a blacklist on Mozilla servers. This is tracking. And there is option to opt-out, there is not even a warning.
If you care about your customer not being followed, include an option blocking the Google-analytics into the browser itself. Irrespectively of privacy, Google-analytics prevents many pages from loading completely: it takes too long to perform all these Google-zero-by-zero pixel dances.
Then you say that the volunteers working on the core code deserve much more respect than volunteers working on extensions. I am not sure that this is the case. I don’t see that the core is noticeably better than for other browsers. The fact that Mozilla wasn’t able to solve during 10 years the main problem of Firefox, namely the buffer overflow, and then stopped even to acknowledge its existence, is very disappointing. In contrast, a lot of extension is very useful.
I know about the testing process only what Mozilla tells to the public. And Mozilla tries to blame the short period between the releases for new bugs introduced in each new release.
What was your idea in suggesting me to read that article? Do you think that it contains some valid excuse to the lie in the Options window, for example?
But the article is useful, thanks. It tells me that there is no hope here and I should look for another browser. In the meantime I should block Firefox from accessing the Mozilla site completely. It looks like very soon I indeed will be an IT professional.
I have absolutely no interest in mobile devices and don’t see how they could be useful for me. And no matter what the projects are, the market share of Firefox is going down.
Best wishes.

Win 8.1 domain workstation. Block all access, except for a fews users/groups and domain controller information/date.

Hi!
Win 8.1 pro, domain workstation. How Block all access, except for a fews users/groups and domain controller information/date.
Nuance:
From domain AD is locked Workstation Firewall "Domain profile" edit.
Possible?
cenubit

Hi GirtsR,
I am not sure the command to use the SID to accomplish what you want to achieve, if you only know the SID, you could take use Powershell to find the related information, more information, please check:
Working with SIDs
And a similar thread for reference:
How to find user/group known only SID
More reference: Default local groups.
Best regards
Michael Shao
TechNet Community Support

Every single time I move to another page, I get a pop-up. Yes, I have clicked on Tools and set browser to block ALL pop-ups. But Mozilla seems to be ingnoring.

Suddenly, a month or so ago, every single time I open a new page, Mozilla opens a pop-up window. Yes, I have clicked on Tools, etc and set my settings to block ALL pop-ups. Yet, Mozilla has decided to circumvent this setting. If this situation is not handled within a week or two, I shall find and begin using another browser (not that anyone really cares).

What does that pop-up show?
Can you attach a screenshot?
*http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Screenshot
*https://support.mozilla.org/kb/how-do-i-create-screenshot-my-problem
Use a compressed image type like PNG or JPG to save the screenshot and make sure that you do not exceed the maximum file size (1 MB).
Do a malware check with some malware scanning programs on the Windows computer. 
You need to scan with all programs because each program detects different malware. 
Make sure that you update each program to get the latest version of their databases before doing a scan. 
*http://www.malwarebytes.org/mbam.php - Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware
*http://www.superantispyware.com/ - SuperAntispyware
*http://www.microsoft.com/security/scanner/en-us/default.aspx - Microsoft Safety Scanner
*http://www.microsoft.com/windows/products/winfamily/defender/default.mspx - Windows Defender: Home Page
*http://www.safer-networking.org/en/index.html - Spybot Search & Destroy
You can also do a check for a rootkit infection with TDSSKiller.
*http://support.kaspersky.com/viruses/solutions?qid=208280684
See also:
*"Spyware on Windows": http://kb.mozillazine.org/Popups_not_blocked

I'm using FF 5 and tried using the block all images feature. It blocks all images, but also blocks all the images on sites I've specified NOT to block. Any way to fix this?

When I examine the page info it lists it as unblocked/allowed for images, but it's still not showing any. It's ignoring any exceptions I list.
Macbook Pro 3,1, Leopard 10.5.8

You do not specify whether to block or show a specific image. 
You specify a domain when you block an image and all images from that domain are blocked. 
You can't use this to block a specific image.
You can look at Adblock Plus.
* Adblock Plus: https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/adblock-plus/
You need to subscribe to a Filter list (e.g. the EasyList).
* http://adblockplus.org/en/subscriptions
* http://adblockplus.org/en/getting_started

Want block all online video stream and chat.

I want to block all video Stream and chat messengers in my laptop irrespective of browsers, my room met always watching porn, you-tube, cricket, movies and soccer videos. I tried blocking IE using content adviser by the help of my colleague, but he installed
chrome and watching. Please suggest me a way where i can block the online stream access in system level.

Hello,
To block sites, check the following links given below, I hope it helps you:
http://windows.microsoft.com/en-AU/windows-live/family-safety-child-kid-protect-filter-sites-chat-faq
OR
http://www.pcworld.com/article/249077/how_to_block_websites.html
Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.

Block all incoming traffic and Active FTP

Will setting the firewall to Block all incoming traffic break Active FTP Connections?
The firewall will normally dynamically create exceptions for the Connection using the Application Layer Gateway, but will the profile override these?

Hi TribleTrouble,
Do you have any issue about FTP active mode?
If the clients are part of your domain, push the FTP firewall rules via GPO to your clients allowing FTP inbound sockets
netsh advfirewall firewall add rule name="File Transfer Program" protocol=TCP profile=domain Program=C:\Windows\System32\ftp.exe dir=in action=allow
netsh advfirewall firewall add rule name="File Transfer Program" protocol=UDP profile=domain Program=C:\Windows\System32\ftp.exe dir=in action=allow
For Windows 7, the entire networking stack was rewritten and several security measures were taken to further secure Windows.
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

Blocking all websites except a few + Skype and other chat programs

Hello,
Can you tell me how can i block all websites from a network except a few of them using a Linksys wireless router?
Also, i need to block several ports used for Skype and other chat apps.
I want this solution to work for the whole network. Not using windows policy or other ways where i'd have to go to every single computer.
Thank you.

There's a way on how to do that but it depends on the model number of your device. What's the model number of your router anyway?

Block all GR and SES

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for