Block Error

Hello folks,
Hope you all fine.
I got following error from "dmesg" , where o/s is failed to read a particular block 137667073
/pci@9,600000/SUNW,qlc@2/fp@0,0/ssd@w500000e011172d21,0 (ssd0):
Apr 27 09:54:12 testsrv Error for Command: read(10) Error Level: Retryable
Apr 27 09:54:12 testsrv scsi: [ID 107833 kern.notice] Requested Block: 137667072 Error Block: 137667073
Apr 27 09:54:12 testsrv scsi: [ID 107833 kern.notice] Vendor: FUJITSU Serial Number: 0519C01UGW.
How can i find out the filename which is affected by the block error?
Is there any tool in Solaris just like dumpe2fs in linux?
Thanks in Advance
Sal.

others will know more than i on finding block number to perhaps file inode location. however, you can use format to run verifies and other physicall disk check utils. fsck can do the check the file system. fsck if it find file/dir probs, will move files/dirs to the lost+found dir at the root of a mount point.

Similar Messages

G/L Account blocked Error while posting goods delivery in VL02n transaction

Our Requirement is to change the G/L account which is proposed by OBYC(automatic account determination ) as per the movement typ and order reason from a Ztable. We need a place to code this logic before this OBYC check happens due to which we getting the account blocked error.
Please suggest some user exit or enhancemnet point where we can place this logic.

hi Ramki.,
I had configured a Surcharge on delivery in the condition type to be calculated on the qty delivered. Say for every Gallon, a surcharge of 0.2 cents is charged. I had maintained ths surcharge as a separate condition type and assigned it to a separate G/L a/c.
Now during PO creation, in the header , the price remains the same as i give for the Unit price.
IN the conditions tab in Item level, the surcharge is added on to the gross price and i get a Net Price.
Without saving the PO, when i go to see the Print-preview, i see only the Gross price.
After saving the PO, in print review, i see
1. Unit gross price under Sl.No.1
2. After the Item description, immediately, there is qty ordered x unit price + surcharge and them following Nett price
3. At the bottom right corner of the PO, i get qty ordered x unit price only . Surcharge amount does not appear.
How do i get the Total Nett price i.e qty ordered x unit price + surcharge to appear on the bottom right of the PO.
Is it a standard functionality for the Total price to appear or does it involve the role of ABAP programming.???
Do clarify my doubts
Tx
MahesH

Why do I keep getting a page block error when trying to use Netflix app. I can't even load the website

Everytime I try to load the Netflix app, I get as far as the red screen and it stops loading. The iPad doesn't freeze, it just stops. Then when I try to go to their website, I get a blocked error message. Does anyone know how to fix this?

Some possibilities:
You are on a network that blocks streaming content or otherwise won't let you access it
You have restrictions set to block some content (Settings App, General, Resrrictions).

Interpration of DBVerify zero block errors

Hello Oracle-experts,
after DBVerify check on my Oracle DB 10.2.0.2 i get the several following errors:
Completely zero block found during dbv:
Page 286685 is marked corrupt
After these warnings I get the error:
BR0398E DBVERIFY detected corrupted blocks in /oracle/<sid>/sapdata4/sr3_8/sr3.data8
Question:
1) How should these zero block errors be interpreted? Is my database therefore corrupt or can these errors be neglected? If not, what is the approach to solve these errors?
The problem is that I have a lot of these errors and do not have a valid backup.
Any helpful information information will be very appreciated!

Hi Holger,
didn't you like the replies of your other threads?
Block Corruption (BR0398E DBVERIFY detected corrupted blocks in /oracle/TS2
BR0398E DBVERIFY detected corrupted blocks in TS SAPSR3
Honestly, handling corruptions is really not that difficult.
You figure out what kind of data is supposed to be stored in the corrupted blocks and take your actions accordingly.
So if you can regenerate the content (like you can do that by rebuilding indexes), you do that.
If you cannot regenerate the content, you need a backup.
That's it. It's all lengthly described in the SAP notes on corruptions. Maybe you should read them ...
> Question:
> 1) How should these zero block errors be interpreted? Is my database therefore corrupt or can these errors be neglected? If not, what is the approach to solve these errors?
> The problem is that I have a lot of these errors and do not have a valid backup.
Ok, having no backups always puts you in dire straits. It's the single one error no DBA is allowed to make.
However, what you should do is to perform a FULL consistency check.
That is:
run ANALYZE TABLE VALIDATE STRUCTURE CASCADE on ALL tables
run a FULL db export to /dev/nul
run DBVerify/RMAN validate on the complete database (looks like you've already done that)
Don't skip a check, don't shortcut - just do them.
Maybe the "completely zero filled blocks* don't belong to any object and you've no data loss.
Then you may (as I already told you in the other thread) reorganize the tablespace to get rid of the warnings.
If there was some data in these blocks that you cannot regenerate then you have to face it: you lost that data.
It's gone and won't come back.
regards,
Lars

Profit Center blocked error in depreciation run

We are upgrading SAP system from 4.6 to 6.0. It was noticed that Profit Center blocked error is being captured in depreciation run test run in the upgraded version. In 4.6, this error is not being captured. Is this an enhancement in the upgraded version?

I have not search information about it. I found this change only positive. Now you have direct to solve the error (wrong profit center) and not later with the retirement. It is only when they block profit centers or assign an other profit center to a cost center that they have to contact asset accounting for changing the asset. In the old version the values on the profit center where wrong, now you have to correct them. I see this more as a bug in the old version that is solved now.
When you don't want this have a look to the error message and turn it of when that is possible, but then you accept that the vallues in profit center accounting are wrong

Coding block error in MB21

hi,
i recorded the BDC for TCODE: MB21 only for 2 screens.
My requiremnt is to display the items. the user can modify the items and save the same.
while saving systems shows the coding block error.
how to remove that coding block error.
regards,
Subu.

avoid bdc and use BAPI_RESERVATION_CREATE

PL/SQL block error message

Hi,
I'm still learning PL/SQL. In my application, I created a PL/SQL block which contains an update and an insert statement. When I click Apply Changes, I receive the following error message:
1 error has occurred
ORA-06550: line 24, column 5: PL/SQL: ORA-00933: SQL command not properly ended ORA-06550: line 19, column 2: PL/SQL: SQL Statement ignored
This is my code. I'm not seeing the problem very clearly. Can someone help me out? Thanks.
BEGIN
update
    HISA_AGREEMENTS
     set
       CREATED_BY=V('APP_USER'),
       LAST_UPDATED_BY=V('APP_USER'),
       APPROVER_SALUTATION=:P7_APPROVER_SALUTATION,
       APPROVER_FIRST_NAME=:P7_APPROVER_FIRST_NAME,
       APPROVER_MIDDLE_INITIAL=:P7_APPROVER_MIDDLE_INITIAL,
       APPROVER_LAST_NAME=:P7_APPROVER_LAST_NAME,
       APPROVER_NAME_SUFFIX=:P7_APPROVER_NAME_SUFFIX,
       APPROVER_EMAIL_ADDR=:P7_APPROVER_EMAIL_ADDR,
       SPONSOR_EMAIL_ADDR=:P7_SPONSOR_EMAIL_ADDR,
       APPROVER_TITLE=:P7_APPROVER_TITLE
where
      ORG_KEY_LE=:P7_ORG_KEY_LE;
insert into
    HISA_AGREEMENT_DOCS
       (ORG_DOC_CURR_KEY)
   values
       (:P7_DOCUMENT)
    where
      ORG_KEY_LE=:P7_ORG_KEY_LE;
END;

Hello,
insert into
HISA_AGREEMENT_DOCS
(ORG_DOC_CURR_KEY)
values
(:P7_DOCUMENT)
where
ORG_KEY_LE=:P7_ORG_KEY_LE;
is wrong. The WHERE clause needs to be omitted...or you need an update.
Greetings,
Roel
http://roelhartman.blogspot.com/
You can reward this reply by marking it as either Helpful or Correct ;-)

GL account blocked error during migo

when i m doing the migo,during the document posting system showing following error msg.
" G/L account 40100211 blocked for posting in company code 1000"
when i m doing same bt vendor is diff.. then i not got any error msg...
tell me what the solution for that?
i hv cheked all by fs00..
pls tell me how i solve this issue?
Thanks & Regards
Rekha Sharma

Go to FS00, key in GL Account 40100211 and Company Code. Click on EDit tab and untick the Block.
If the issue is in Production client, please take the help of FI consultant.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Getting "Additions to this Web site have been blocked" error

Hi Everyone
While updating item in one of our large document library we are facing below mentioned error:
Additions to this Web site have been blocked.
Below is details of error. Appreciate to get solution on this. Pl. note this error we are facing on production and not facing on UAT and Development.
is it related to content database size?
Error in Project Documents event Receiver.AddChildMetadataToHashTable(), Error Details : Microsoft.SharePoint.SPException:
Additions to this Web site have been blocked.
Please contact the administrator to resolve this problem. --->
System.Runtime.InteropServices.COMException: <nativehr>0x81020066</nativehr><nativestack></nativestack>
Additions to this Web site have been blocked.
Please contact the administrator to resolve this problem.
   at Microsoft.SharePoint.Library.SPRequestInternalClass.AddOrUpdateItem(String bstrUrl, String bstrListName, Boolean bAdd, Boolean bSystemUpdate, Boolean bPreserveItemVersion, Boolean bPreserveItemUIVersion, Boolean bUpdateNoVersion, Int32&
plID, String& pbstrGuid, Guid pbstrNewDocId, Boolean bHasNewDocId, String bstrVersion, Object& pvarAttachmentNames, Object& pvarAttachmentContents, Object& pvarProperties, Boolean bCheckOut, Boolean bCheckin, Boolean bUnRestrictedUpdateInProgress,
Boolean bMigration, Boolean bPublish, String bstrFileName, ISP2DSafeArrayWriter pListDataValidationCallback, ISP2DSafeArrayWriter pRestrictInsertCallback, ISP2DSafeArrayWriter pUniqueFieldCallback)
   at Microsoft.SharePoint.Library.SPRequest.AddOrUpdateItem(String bstrUrl, String bstrListName, Boolean bAdd, Boolean bSystemUpdate, Boolean bPreserveItemVersion, Boolean bPreserveItemUIVersion, Boolean bUpdateNoVersion, Int32& plID, String&
pbstrGuid, Guid pbstrNewDocId, Boolean bHasNewDocId, String bstrVersion, Object& pvarAttachmentNames, Object& pvarAttachmentContents, Object& pvarProperties, Boolean bCheckOut, Boolean bCheckin, Boolean bUnRestrictedUpdateInProgress, Boolean bMigration,
Boolean bPublish, String bstrFileName, ISP2DSafeArrayWriter pListDataValidationCallback, ISP2DSafeArrayWriter pRestrictInsertCallback, ISP2DSafeArrayWriter pUniqueFieldCallback)
   --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
   at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPGlobal.HandleComException(COMException comEx)
   at Microsoft.SharePoint.Library.SPRequest.AddOrUpdateItem(String bstrUrl, String bstrListName, Boolean bAdd, Boolean bSystemUpdate, Boolean bPreserveItemVersion, Boolean bPreserveItemUIVersion, Boolean bUpdateNoVersion, Int32& plID, String&
pbstrGuid, Guid pbstrNewDocId, Boolean bHasNewDocId, String bstrVersion, Object& pvarAttachmentNames, Object& pvarAttachmentContents, Object& pvarProperties, Boolean bCheckOut, Boolean bCheckin, Boolean bUnRestrictedUpdateInProgress, Boolean bMigration,
Boolean bPublish, String bstrFileName, ISP2DSafeArrayWriter pListDataValidationCallback, ISP2DSafeArrayWriter pRestrictInsertCallback, ISP2DSafeArrayWriter pUniqueFieldCallback)
   at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPListItem.AddOrUpdateItem(Boolean bAdd, Boolean bSystem, Boolean bPreserveItemVersion, Boolean bNoVersion, Boolean bMigration, Boolean bPublish, Boolean bCheckOut, Boolean bCheckin, Guid newGuidOnAdd, Int32& ulID, Object&
objAttachmentNames, Object& objAttachmentContents, Boolean suppressAfterEvents, String filename, Boolean bPreserveItemUIVersion)
   at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPListItem.UpdateInternal(Boolean bSystem, Boolean bPreserveItemVersion, Guid newGuidOnAdd, Boolean bMigration, Boolean bPublish, Boolean bNoVersion, Boolean bCheckOut, Boolean bCheckin, Boolean suppressAfterEvents, String
filename, Boolean bPreserveItemUIVersion)
   at IOM.DMSPortal.EventReceivers.ProjectDocEvents.ProjectEventAction.UpdateProjectFiles(Hashtable UpdatedValues, SPFileCollection spFolderColl)
   at IOM.DMSPortal.EventReceivers.ProjectDocEvents.ProjectEventAction.UpdateChildItems(SPItemEventProperties properties, Hashtable UpdatedValues, String strContentType)
   at IOM.DMSPortal.EventReceivers.ProjectDocEvents.ProjectEventAction.AddChildMetadataToHashTable(SPItemEventProperties properties, SPContentType spcont, Hashtable hashUpdatedPropTable, String strContentType)
Thanks
Best Regards
Safder

Hi safder husain ,
For troubleshooting, please take steps as below:
Take a quick look in Central Administration.If the Content Database has been taken "offline" then it will halt any database editing (typically used for maintenance such as backing up / restoring or major
farm config).
Check SQL .This can also happen if the Transaction Logs are full .. or you've run out of disk space.
Check if you have set a Site Collection Quota ... if the site collection exceeds the "quota" size then adding new content will be restricted.Go to Central Administration -> Application Management ->
Configure Quotas and Locks. Set the Site Lock Information to "Not Lock" (it had been set to " Read-only (blocks additions, updates, and deletions)”).
Please inform me freely if you have any questions.
Thanks
Eric Tao
TechNet Community Support

BUS2094 delete billing block error

Hi all,
We are executing standard workflow process for Credit Memo using BUS2094, we can be able to process the workflow till Releaser can release the Credit Memo, once its releases we are getting error " BUS2094 - Method Deletebillingblock can not be executed " Due to which this process can not remove Billing Block of the do
The same thing is working fine on Development server. we have checked the same scenario on Dev Server, its working without an error.
I would like somebody to help me in this matter.

Hi,
1.Can you let us know that did you recently move any new version of workflow from DEV to QAS or PROD, if you have imported any new version of the workflow then try to refresh teh buffer by using txn SWU_OBUF.
2. Check for the user authorizations who is initiating the process If anything is missing then assign the respective authorizations.
3. Make sure the workflow template agent assignment is made as General task you can do this from PFTC transaction.
4. Missed out to ask you to check the workflow log. It helps you to understand whether the problem lies in the workflow or with the data in the system.
Regards
Pavan
Edited by: Pavan Bhamidipati on Nov 29, 2011 12:34 PM

Graphical Modeler Security settings blocking error

Hi,
We are getting the error message 'Application Blocked by Security Settings' when we click the Graphical Modeler from Profile Set Creation view.
Request you to suggest on how to fix this issue.
Best regards,
Azaz.

Hi Azaz,
Try un-installing Java on your desktop and re-install once again.

Plsql block error

I have small PLSQL block with a bind variable in it which throws an error on its execution.
declare
cursor c1 is select product_name from PRODUCTS where month=:m;
begin
for i in c1 loop
dbms_output.put_line(i.product_name);
end loop;
end;
It thows the error
ORA-01008: not all variables bound
Is it not possible to have a bind variable in a cursor?
Please help
Regards

If you're using SQL*Plus you need to declare and set the bind variable...
SQL> set serverout on;
SQL> var d number;
SQL> exec :d := 20;
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.07
SQL> ed
Wrote file afiedt.buf
1 declare
2    cursor c1 is select ename from emp where deptno=:d;
3 begin
4    for i in c1 loop
5      dbms_output.put_line(i.ename);
6    end loop;
7* end;
SQL> /
SMITH
JONES
SCOTT
ADAMS
FORD
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.06
SQL>

Corrupt block error + valid data found ???

Hi,
I am getting a peculiar block corruption error in my production database (9.2.0.8).
It also says "valid data found". I am able to analyze the suspect table without any reported issues. Can any one please suggest?
Details from Alertlog below:-
Corrupt block relative dba: 0x01463cbf (file 5, block 408767)
Bad header found during user buffer read
Data in bad block -
type: 50 format: 0 rdba: 0x3a383020
last change scn: 0x0338.303a3630 seq: 0xc2 flg: 0x38
consistency value in tail: 0x36302036
check value in block header: 0x3c27, block checksum disabled
spare1: 0x30, spare2: 0x36, spare3: 0x1502
Reread of rdba: 0x01463cbf (file 5, block 408767) found valid data
Hex dump of Absolute File 5, Block 408768 in trace file d:\oracle\admin\fm\udump\fm_ora_5236.trc
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi,
May be this will help
Data block corruption…..
Regards
Jafar

Content Blocked Error in Portal.

Hi Gurus,
We are facing a problem in portal logins.
After Login through the browser at the portal we get the certificate error. A pop up appears which says "Internet explorer has blocked this content with security certificate error".
At the below screen we see this " Content was blocked because it was not signed by a valid security certificate"
We have tried to reinstall the certificate but no success.
Kindly help.
Thanks in advance.
Basistechie.

Take a look @ SAP Note 939130.
Not exactly your issue but related.
Might be helpful.
Request you to thoroughly search the forum as well as the Market place before posting an issue.

Procedure based blocks - error using Forms 6/8i/NT

A simple form with a procedure-based block fails with the Lock procedure, giving an ORA-03114 error. I believe there is some known bug with procedure-based blocks using Forms 6 and Oracle 8i over NT. The Query procedure (based on a ref cursor) works fine, but the Lock, Insert and Delete triggers (and presumably the Update trigger too - without a Lock I can't get that far) return the error (these are based on a table).
Does anyone know if this is a known bug? The same form has run successfully using Forms 6/Oracle 7.3/VMS.

It's a known bug and the patch is available through MetaLink.

Block Error

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for