Bluescreen with Lightroom and Vista

Hi, I found several postings for this thread, but nothing is exactly like this:
I have a new Computer Quad, 4GB RAM. and Vista Premium 32bit.
Vista works well.
Only I use Lightroom 2.0 and 2.3 the trouble begins..
In Develope mode the system crash to a bLuescreen.
I export pictures the system crash to a bLuescreen..
Sometimes pictures have failure after a new start.
Bluescreen: 0x00000124 (0x00000000, 0x850FA028, 0xF4142000, 0x00000145)
Posting after new start:
Problemereignisname: BlueScreen
Betriebsystemversion: 6.0.6001.2.1.0.768.3
Gebietsschema-ID: 1031
Zusatzinformationen zum Problem:
BCCode: 124
BCP1: 00000000
BCP2: 858B33F0
BCP3: B4002000
BCP4: 39000145
OS Version: 6_0_6001
Service Pack: 1_0
Product: 768_1
Adobe gave me a Hotfix. Don't work.
Adobe said: It's a Vista problem.
Have one of you an idea.
Sorry english isn't my favorit - I understand German better..
Dieter

Similar Messages

So i bought the 9.99 a month photoshop (with lightroom) and then installed CC when i went to the app tab both PS and LR said "try" instead of install is that how setup usually goes? or well it ask me later for serial numbers?

so i bought the 9.99 a month photoshop (with lightroom) and then installed CC when i went to the app tab both PS and LR said "try" instead of install is that how setup usually goes? or well it ask me later for serial numbers?

Oscarf16161909 for information on how to resolve the connection error preventing the active membership from authorizing please see Sign in, activation, or connection errors | CS5.5 and later. If you have any questions regarding the steps listed in the document you are welcome to update this discussion.

My Question is: I have a Lightroom 5 software buyed single on my MAC. If now I buy a CC Pack with Lightroom and Photoshop...what happened? How I can install AGAIN a other version of lightroom 5 ?! and this is necessary because the version included in pack

My Question is: I have a Lightroom 5 software buyed single on my MAC. If now I buy a CC Pack with Lightroom and Photoshop...what happened? How I can install AGAIN a other version of lightroom 5 ?! and this is necessary because the version included in pack has a mobile function that my actual version don't has. Thanks to help.
Can live two version equal of lightroom on same MAC ?
mmm .... I Doubt...
Suggestion.. ?

My Question is: I have a Lightroom 5 software buyed single on my MAC. If now I buy a CC Pack with Lightroom and Photoshop...what happened? How I can install AGAIN a other version of lightroom 5 ?! and this is necessary because the version included in pack has a mobile function that my actual version don't has. Thanks to help.
Can live two version equal of lightroom on same MAC ?
mmm .... I Doubt...
Suggestion.. ?

Laptop monitor choice for photo editing with lightroom and photoshop

Hi,
i'm going to buy a laptop, mostly for photo editing with lightroom and photoshop use.
I'm in trouble with the display choice.
One laptop has LG LP156WF4 or AUO B156HAN01 display, that should be very similar matte ips display with 55%-60% coverage of AdobeRGB. You can find a review in the "Display" section of these link : http://www.notebookcheck.net/Review-Clevo-W650SJ-Schenker-M504-Barebones-Notebook.114329.0 .html
The other laptop hasAU Optronics B156HW01 V.4 Matte 95%, that is a TN matte display with 95% coverage of AdobeRGB. You can find a review in these link (the display should be the green bar): http://www.anandtech.com/show/4649/mythlogic-pollux-1400-clevos-w150hr-tested/6
My question is: which one is better for photo editing with photoshop and lightroom?
Someone says that ips is better because of the fidelity of color reproduction, view angles and contrast.
Someone, on the other side, says that the TN 95% is better because of the gamut%.
Can you help me?
Thanks,
Marco Grechi

Macbook pro is out of budget
Hp assistance said that in italy they don't sell laptop with dreamcolor (i'll call again tomorrow to be sure ) but i think that it would be out of budget (max 2000 euro).
They said that the best solution for me is the zbook 15 g2 (2300 euro), but they DON'T know brand and model of the display and if i can have SSD + HD inside the zbook 15 g2.
The laptop with the lg panel costs 1500 euro. the question is; "i know that the lg display is not the best, but is it almost sufficient for my use?". In this way i may save 500/800 to buy a separated display later.
I have read that dell xps 15 and dell precision m3800 have great display, but they are glossy and very reflective. Is it a big handicap?
Do you know the 3k 15,6" display Panasonic VVX16T020G00 ? It should be a 8-bit display with 72%NTSC gamut ( http://www.panelook.com/VVX16T020G00_Panasonic_15.5_LCM_parameter_22014.html )
Do you sugget me a 3k display for photo editing?
Thanks

Why Photoshop stopped working with Lightroom and how to fix it?

Why Photoshop stopped working with Lightroom and how to fix it?

As I am editing photos in lightroom and just right click on the photo to select to edit in photoshop the opting shows up in gray out but it isn't available for selection anylonger. It was working just fine a few days ago.
Thank you for your reply!!!

Getting static audio with Titanium and Vista x64 at random times

@Getting static audio with Titanium and Vista x64 at random times$ I have had this card for about 6-8 months and relati'vely no issues.
I just upgraded to the latest drivers 270006 and now, sometimes after exiting Turbine's Lotro, my audio plays but is very static-y, but it doesn't happen all the time. I had iTunes minimized when playing Lotro and then went to play a song after exiting. I quit iTunes and tried it again and it was ok.
This also happened in Firefox, a YouTube video had the same static audio.
It doesn't happen all the time and I do play other games, but I haven't been playing much else right now.
So right now I don't know if it's a Lotro thing or just the drivers.
I have a Q9650, single GTX260, Asus P35 board (not SLI), Vista x64, 4GB.

Carl, do let us know on the Safe Mode test... would be the first thing I'd try with what you've mentioned, but yeah, daisy chained Hubs could possibly play into it.

Lightroom and Vista....Any workaround for memory? - Cause it's slow

I've searched all over for a soution.   I can not tolerate the lack of responsiveness that Lightroom 3 has when it comes to working on my RAW files.   Here's my system info...bear in mind that I was working on 1 NEF file
Lightroom version: 3.0 [677000]
Operating system: Windows Vista Home Edition Service Pack 2 (Build 6002)
Version: 6.0 [6002]
Application architecture: x86
System architecture: x86
Physical processor count: 4
Processor speed: 2.6 GHz
Built-in memory: 3070.5 MB
Real memory available to Lightroom: 716.8 MB
Real memory used by Lightroom: 993.1 MB (138.5%)
Virtual memory used by Lightroom: 1115.8 MB
Memory cache size: 0.0 MB
System DPI setting: 96 DPI
Desktop composition enabled: Yes
That's a quad core with 3GB of memory however, Vista only makes 700mb of memory available for lightroom and as you can see, processiong one raw file puts me at over the allocated memory.   Lightroom 3 System requirements call for 2MB of available RAM. I surpass that but the system requirements don't seem to take into account the Vista memory allocation issue.
Is there a way, that anyone is aware of, to allocate more memory to lightroom 3? I can not work at this pace. I can't even export the processed image as a full size jpg because I get the "not enough memory" error message in lightroom.   I disable all uneeded processes when running lightroom by the way which includes turning off anti-virus. I usually have my laptop running on the corner of my desk in the event I need to look something up on the web.
This has become unusable in this current state. Is this a Vista flaw, a lightroom flaw or a combination of both. Is anyone aware of a workaround to this issue?
Thanks to all that respond.
Fulvio

As stated elsethread, 32-bit Windows operating systems can address 4Gb of memory. In general, out of the box installs will allow user processes 2Gb of that. So Lr has access to 2Gb for the static application and for the memory it uses at run time. This 2Gb also has to be shared by other processes, so the OS provides virtual memory to let applications grow as necessary, up to that 4Gb limit.
There are tricks for giving user processes more memory, but there is often a trade-off because of the way Windows segments this memory. One of the trade-offs is that access to the other chunk of memory is much slower, though not as slow as paging. There are other gotchas, too.
What other processes are using up real memory? Which ones demand to be paged in from virtual memory (which could slow down other applications like Lr)?
So, Lr will use memory if the memory manager can give it memory, but it really has to take what it gets. And some operations are memory intensive, especially on larger raw files. If the memory Lr is using is being paged, it can result in perceptually slow application performance.
I'd start with firing up Vista with very little running. Exit all user applications, and kill services you don't need when working with photos, like real-time anti-virus protection (most of which are nothing more than a panacea that eat up resources and slow down the entire OS) and the search index stuff (which is basically broken until Windows 7) and stuff like that.
Make sure you make a large raw cache, and put the raw cache on a fast disk that is not the same as the one where your previews are. Buy a cheap drive and format it NTFS just for this purpose, if you have to. Disk space is cheap, and it can act as a backup for your photos on import. Get rid of all the video/sound/whatever driver cruft that is not the just the drivers. nVidia, et al, love to install toolbar cruft that gives you nothing except higher CPU and memory usage. You might want to create a new user account that is as clean a possible with all this stuff disabled or removed.
Lr /can/ work ok in a limited 32-bit environment, but you might have to tune the system a little.

Problem with Lightroom and Epson Printer

I'm suddenly having problems printing from Lightroom. I have Lightroom 1.4.1 installed on an iMac G5, and have an Epson Photo Stylus R2400. I've been using this combination from the beginning with no problems. Now suddenly when I try to print I get an error message that says Media is out or not loaded correctly. Neither is the case. I have tried restarting my computer, the printer and everything else I can think of, but nothing works. I can print from any other application without problems, so I'm assuming it's an issue with Lightroom.
Has anyone experienced anything similar? I was going to uninstall lightroom and do a reinstall but I can't find my installation disc. Now I'm at a loss to figure out what to do.
Thanks,
Craig

Try deleting you prefs file and/or print templates.
Lightroom is unique to many other programs in that it saves and restores printer settings. Some bad data may tried to be passes. A "fresh start" might help.

Problem with Lightroom and Infrared Photography

This problem is specifically related to using LR & PS to process Infrared images. I apologize if this forum may not be the correct place to ask this question. I am having problems processing Infrared Images when using LR & PS. I take my IR images with a 530 IR conversion to a Canon G12 camera. I learned early on Adobe products don't play well with IR images (they come in magenta when importing ) so I bring IR images shot withmy G12 into my computer with Canon Digital Photo Professional and then work in LR & PS from there.
If I then directly open this imported image from my hard drive into Photoshop and try and do adjustments such as blue sky adjustments with a red/blue channel swap, it works fine, just as I would expect.
(If you are not familiar with IR processing, I understand this introduction and question will not make sense)
But when using Lightroom, I sometimes have issues. I always import all my images into LR. Even with IR images, after using DPP to bring them to my computer, I import them into LR for cataloging purposes and to make other potential adjustments. Then my usual workflow is to move photos from LR to Photoshop via the "edit in" command. This opens a dialog box giving a choice of "edit a copy with LR adjustments" which is the default option and the one I always use, or "edit original".
Here's the interesting thing I finally discovered.
If I send the photo from LR to PS using the "edit a copy with Lightroom adjustments" option, I get a bad blue sky effect, where the sky is green and the foliage is pink instead of the sky being blue and the foliage yellow. But if I send it to PS using the "edit original" option, the blue sky effect works fine.
So there appears to be an issue when tring to send IR images from Lightroom to Photoshop. Any thoughts?
Thanks,
Matthew Kraus

Thanks so much for working on this.
I fear the behavior you noticed was just due to the fact I cheanged the
file from 16 bit to 8 bit so the size was smaller and I could easily email
it. When I open any of my regular 16 bit files, whether I send them to PS
as "edit original" or "edit copy with lightroom adjustments", they both end
up as 16 bit and as far as I can see, seem the same, though obviously they
are not.
I don't really have a preset, but I'll walk you through the process.
1. Choose Channel Mixer from the Adjustment Pannel
2. Make sure the output channel is red, change the red channel slider from
100% to 0% and increase the blue channel slider from 0% to 100%. You can
type in the values.
3. Change the output channel to blue. Increase the red channel from 0% to
100% and the blue channel from 100% to 0%.
This is supposed to change the sky from brown to blue and the foliage from
blue to yellow and is what happens when you use the "edit original"
option. When you use the "edit copy with lightroom adjustments", the sky
turns green and the foliage pink. So you get 2 different behaviors,
depending on which option you use to bring the image from LR to PS.
That's my question, why do you get 2 different behaviors?
Thanks,
Matthew Kraus

Problem with standby and Vista

Hi!
I've a problem with my X61 with the Turbo Memory and Vista x64: When I install the driver for Turbo Memory, I cannot resume from standby. The notebook does only a "normal" reboot.
Can anybody help me with this problem?
scw

well after a lengthy talk with many microsoft reps i found something. I was an updated version of this "WUDfrd.sys" file. But the problem was that i could not see a download link. but after a little while i convinced microsoft to give it to me. at first it looked like it had potential but after i restarted, every went down the plug hole. here is the link that i was talking about.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/933607/en-us
problem still not solved and not looking to be solved for a long time by the looks of things.... NOT HAPPY JAN!!!

Can an iPhoto library be shared with Lightroom and capture one?

Since Aperture is being replaced by … nothing, how can I access the same library with multiple editors?

Neither iPhoto, Lightroom nor Capture One are editors. They are all database driven Photo Managers with non-destructive processing. There is no rational workflow that would use more than one of these apps, any more than it would make sense to write a novel in three different word processors at the same time.
Pick the one that suits your needs - if you're coming from Aperture then forget iPhoto, it's much less capable and also being end-of-lifed. Pick between Lightroom and Capture One. Then google the options for migration from Aperture to the one you choose.

P1006 - networked with XP and VIsta-64 not printing more than 2 pages

Hello - I have a dilemma with my HP P1006. I have the printer directly plugged in (USB) with my XP (32bit) PC. I have a Vista-64 PC networked with it. Both (XP-32 and Vista-64) are plugged in directly to the router (not wireless). My question is why can I not print more than two pages at a time with items opened on the Vista-64 PC? I CAN print more than two pages with items opened in the XP-32.
Things I've done:
1 - uninstalled everything & reinstalled the latest drivers for the XP-32.
2 - marked the printer as "sharing" on the XP-32.
3 - confirmed the printer is marked "enable bidirectional sharing" under the printer properties on the XP-32 PC.
Things I perplexed about:
1 - why won't items (docs, webpages, etc.) print more than two pages at a time from the Vista-64 PC?
2 - is there any reason that I should download a driver for the Vista-64 OS? If so, which PC do I download it to?
3 - I have another printer (Lexmark inkjet) connected in the same way (except it is a serial port not USB) and it can print more than two pages of a document at one time with no problem from either the XP-32 or Vista-64 PC? Why?
Any thoughts on this situation? Any suggestions are greatly appreciate.
Thank you - Jane.

Hi!
I just get a system message at teh bottom of teh screen saying "output cannot be issued " and it remains on teh same screen . I goto t-code va23 and enter my quotation number and on the top I select sales document ...issue output and select my output type and print preview or prnit , it comes out of that screen into the first screen and at the bottom gives msg "Output cannot be issued". I beleiev its not allowing the smartform to display when there are more than 2 pages , because I tried it with a contact which has 2 pages and it shows output but when I try with the one having more items i.e more than 2 pages it comes out of it . Its a smartform issue and something in the smartform is causing problem I beleive.
Thanks

Working with Lightroom and Bridge

I have been using Lightroom for my photos, but was thinking of doing the following:
- Use Bridge to import files, and sort and tag them
- This has the benefit of allowing me to categorize movies, etc.
- Then open and use Lightroom for editing, etc.
Q1: LR is non-destructive. If I add a tag to an image in Bridge, does that write it to the file? Is it non-destructive.
Q2: If I import files into Bridge, do I open LR and import them in there too, or can I simply share the photos between the 2 programs?
Q3: Does LR read the keyword tags from Bridge?
Thoughts?
Thanks...
John

I use Bridge exclusively for culling, editing, keywording. It is faster at those tasks, since it does not require importing everything into a database in order to edit them and then export them. I also already have a DAM that I presently prefer to LR, and likewise for slide shows and printing. I do maintain a 20,000 image test catalog in LR so that I can thoroughly test each of its trial versions, so I am very familiar with it from the first Beta testing to the present.
As long as you write your metadata to sidecars--or directly to tif and jpeg files, or DNG-- both Bridge and LR can see the changes made in either. However, if after you have imported files into the LR Library--and you must do that in order to use any of the features of LR on images--and subsequently delete them, then you must synchronize the folder they are in(lightroom menu item)to clear those image references from Lightrooom's Library. Same goes for adding files to a folder from outside of LR. There are a few things you must remember to do. It is not an entirely automatic process.
If you do a lot of work in PS on your images, you will likely find that working in Bridge with its very fast connection to PS will be faster. If you also do a lot of video--or mixed video,graphics, and image work, you are also likely to find Bridge faster and more workflow effective. LR is strictly a Photographic image management and editing application, from which you can do basic printing, very basic slideshows, and web work.
On the other hand, if you do little editing beyond what ACR provides (same features as LR) and need a DAM that manages only photographic images, and you find the LR Print, web and slideshow features satsifactory, then LR will overall be the more effective workflow.
The only way to determine which is right for you is to give your workflow a thorough test with LR and compare that to Bridge. LR 2.3 appears to be free of significant bugs, is fast and smooth, so this would is a good time for comparison. Bridge CS4/ACR 5.3 have been significantly upgraded as well, as you know. Workflows differ, sometimes significantly, as do machine configurations, so thorough individual testing is a must. Use the tools that will do the best job for your requirements.

I am having trouble with lightroom and photoshop being too slow.

Currently I am using LR 5.6 64bit andCS5 64 bit. Is the programs are running too slow because I am using 64 bit? If so, how do I get the other versions. I just started having this problem with the new upgrades.
Please if anyone knows what to do please answer right away. I have jobs that I need to get out.

Thank you both for replying. My processor is 3.2 Ghz. Ram 8gig 64 bit operating. Size of files are 29.6m
available Ram is set to 7170 range in MB i have set to 5019. I have the sync set to sync everything.
When I am importing into lightroom a new scan card, Raw, Canon D 5 Mark II raw. my Lightroom changes to DNG. It can take several minutes to edit. LR will spin quite a while when I try to look at a file in library or develop module after the files have been imported to lightroom. I have my preferences set to hold for 30 days so it should not take so long for files to refocus when I close lightroom and then reopen later. When I bring photo into photoshop, it sometimes it will not open if I have another file open in Photoshop. It takes 30 seconds for a file to open in photoshop from Lightroom.When I zoom in on a photo in LR it takes up to 30 seconds to focus.

Flawed colors with Lightroom and Fuji XE-1

The Camera Raw support for Fuji XE-1 is heavily flawed. Using Lightroom as a raw converter for these pictures, severe color mismatches can be found in the images. The problem is well known and was frequently reported on in internet blogs (sometimes refered to as "chroma smearing"), and it still persists even with Lightroom 4.3. Fuji tells me that all necessary data was given to Adobe long ago. So here comes my question: Why is the support for Fuji's XE-1 so flawed and when will Adobe guarantee full compatibility?

There is a thread in the Official Adobe forum for the reporting of bugs and feature request about the sub-standard processing of raw files from the Fuji X Pro1 and X E1. They have acknowledged that they are aware of the problem and are working on resolving the issue.
It appears that the Fuji sensor is unique and more of a chalange in creating an acceptable quality profile. I am sure that Abobe is making every effort to resolve the problem, however they will not release an update untill it meets their quality standard. Process engines are different for every third party raw processing software providers who are not able to use the camera manufacturer's proprietory processes and profiles.
Each provider have their own chefs and recipe's are unique.
http://feedback.photoshop.com/photoshop_family/topics/camera_raw_7_1_with_xpro_1_raw_detai l_area_change_to_oil_painting_effect

Bluescreen with Lightroom and Vista

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for