Bold versions of Adobe fonts

I'm using the Type Kit font Montserrat Bold in my Photoshop layout and need to use it in Muse but I can't seem to locate the bold version for my layout.
Thoughts?

Hi enjoycollisions,
Montserrat is not part of the Typekit font library, but it is available on Google Fonts. You can find more information on the Google page:
Google Fonts
Hope this helps! Best,
-- liz

Similar Messages

My fonts in internet explorer have gone haywire since downloading later version of adobe reader

my fonts have all gone haywire after downloading newer version of adobe reader. some are huge and others are tiny. some things fit on the page but others dont

> Do you know how I can get IE to open the create version of ADOBE?
De-install Adobe Reader 8 and re-install Adobe Acrobat 5.

Adobe Font Folio - no single user version?

As my business has grown, I had decided it was time to purchase a full Adobe
font library. I just looked at Adobe.com and see that their Adobe Font Folio
only comes in 5,10 or 20 user versions. As I am a one-person office, any of
those is overkill (and over priced). Is there truly no single user version
available? I would even consider an older version than the present (11) if
it is OT (I am unfamiliar with when Adobe switched over to all OT in font
folio).
Any ideas?
Cyndee

Your comment about Adobe going out of their way to hide the licensing agreement is blatantly untrue and inflammatory. Unlike many other software companies, Adobe makes it EULAs (End User License Agreements)
freely and
readily available for end-user download and/or inspection
at any time via its web site. At the bottom of the home page
is a link to
Product license agreements bringing you to
. On that page you will find every Adobe product listed including all the
Type products, each with a pointer to web pages with the respective EULAs.
In terms of the number of users permitted to use a particular license and restrictions (such as not sharing one license amongst a group of five independent designers, for example), this is spelled out specifically fairly early in the EULA for Type products.
Adobe hides no aspects of its EULAs and does not claim rights to change those EULAs after you agree to them.
- Dov

Where are adobe fonts installed in Mac OSX?

Hi,
I need the same Adobe fonts in Photoshop CS6 and InDesign CS6.
Where are they installed in OSX?
Do my Adobe programs install fonts in a different folder than other programs do?

BOILERPLATE TEXT:
If you give complete and detailed information about your setup and the issue at hand,
such as your platform (Mac or Win),
exact versions of your OS, of Photoshop (not just "CS6", but something like CS6v.13.0.6) and of Bridge,
your settings in Photoshop > Preference > Performance
the type of file you were working on,
machine specs, such as total installed RAM, scratch file HDs, total available HD space, video card specs, including total VRAM installed,
what troubleshooting steps you have taken so far,
what error message(s) you receive,
if having issues opening raw files also the exact camera make and model that generated them,
if you're having printing issues, indicate the exact make and model of your printer, paper size, image dimensions in pixels (so many pixels wide by so many pixels high). if going through a RIP, specify that too.
A screen shot of your settings or of the image could be very helpful too,
etc.,
someone may be able to help you (not necessarily this poster, who is not a Windows user).
Please read this FAQ for advice on how to ask your questions correctly for quicker and better answers:
http://forums.adobe.com/thread/419981?tstart=0
Thanks!

Why does embedding Adobe fonts in EPUB cause all text to display as oblique?

I have been having this problem for a while now to various degrees, and I stopped using InDesign to build and export EPUB files for a long time because of it. Lately I have decided to try reintroducing InDesign into my EPUB workflow. However, I have found that whenever I try to export an EPUB 2 file from InDesign CC 2014.1 while embedding Adobe fonts, all the text in the EPUB displays as oblique when I open the resulting file in Sigil or Calibre. Removing and then re-adding the fonts with no obfuscation does not correct the issue. Not embedding the fonts during export -- or removing them from the EPUB entirely -- eliminates the display problem, but obviously I can't expect people to have these fonts installed on their computers.
I do believe most Adobe font licenses allow for embedding, so I don't think this is a security issue. For the sake of this discussion the issue I am having is with Arno Pro OTF (Regular, Italic, Bold).
I can't find anything about this on the web. Can anyone help me with this issue, or has anyone else experienced this at least?
Thanks!
Allen

Here's another piece of information to add to the puzzle. The first screenshot is from Calibre on an PC with Windows 8.1 (using Google Chrome as default search engine). The second is from Calibre on a Mac with Yosemite 10.10.1 (using Safari 8.0.2 as default search engine). Both with the same ePub file created on CC2014 on the Mac using Arno Pro for the Latin text, Adobe Song for Chinese, and Deja Vu Sans for the Hexagram

Using Japanese version of Adobe Reader (9 or 10) on English Windows XP?

Our users have Windows XP SP3 English with the Windows XP Japanese MUI installed. Up until now we have been using the English Adobe Reader 8 with the Japanese Font pack. I am just curious if there would be any problems with using the Japanese version of Adobe Reader 9 or 10 (still deliberating which version to upgrade users to). on the English language client OS (which has the Japanese XP MUI installed). This would save us having to deploy the Adobe Reader Japanese font pack and manage it.
I have tried installing it as such and it appears to work but I wonder if any issues may appear long term. Appreciate any advice. Thanks.

Here is the Recommended Path
Reader 9.5.0 -> 9.5.1 (Quarterly)-> 9.5.2 (Quarterly)
Please slso consider the article mentioned below for Reader Deployment
http://helpx.adobe.com/acrobat/kb/update-patch-acrobat-reader-7.html
~PRANAV

Why Do I Have Multiple Versions of Adobe Flash Plugins in FireFox

Hello,
I usually have 2 versions of Adobe Flash plugins installed in Firefox at the same time: the most recent version and the prior version which remains behind after an update. I usually disable the older version but sometimes this also affect the updated version leaving me without Flash capability in FireFox.
This week I updated FireFox's Adobe Flash plugin to 12.0.0.43 but was surprised to discover the 2 prior Flash versions also remained. Now Firefox had 3 versions of Adobe Flash plugins. I discovered the Adobe Flash uninstaller and uninstalled all Flash from my computer. Surprisingly when I reinstalled Flash player in FireFox, again 2 versions were installed: 12 and 11. I attempted to use the uninstaller on FireFox alone but it did not recognize the older Flash plugin, only the updated version 12.
The recent Adobe Flash update, version 12, is a 'Critical Security' update. Therefore, I am a bit anxious to resolve this issue. I hope you can assist me with this issue.
Thank you.
Windows 7
Home Premium (64 bit)
FireFox 26'''bold text'''

I might have thought the uninstaller would have found and deleted the old FlashPlayer. Maybe it was a custom install and in an odd location. (I suppose another possibility is that registry entries are wrong).
Try totally uninstalling FlashPlayer using the Windows Control panel, before re-installing. Then check with the FlashPlayer uninstaller before reinstalling again.
Note whilst doing this that Windows Internet Explorer has its own FlashPlayer plugin that is separate. You will need to reinstall both the Fx fox & IE plugins afterwards. Also note that for 32bit Firefox you will need the 32 bit FlashPlayer.

New release of the Adobe Font Development Kit for OpenType

A new release (v1.6.6148) of the Adobe Font Development Kit for OpenType has just been posted at:
http://partners.adobe.com/asn/developer/type/otfdk/main.html
This includes some minor changes in the feature file syntax, slightly better documentation for the MakeOTF tool, a complete installation procedure for Mac OSX 10.2.4, addition of the "Unicode and Glyph Names" documentation under the FDK license, and minor bug fixes.
The most important change has to do with the handling of contextual substitution layout rules. MakeOTF now includes an option to create these either correctly, according to the OpenType specification v1.4, or in the older format used by InDesign v2.0 and earlier. This option is now tied to some additional logic, such that if you build a font to be compatible with InDesign v2.0 and earlier, some special text will appear in the name table named-id 5 "Version" . This text will serve as a marker that the font uses the InDesign v2.0 compatible format for these rules, and will consequently work with not only InDesign 2.0 and earlier, but also with any future programs that know to recognize the special text.. The special text was chosen in order to permit all known older OpenType fonts which have contextual substitution layout rules to keep working under future revisions of Adobe programs.
This meant to be only a short-term solution. We do not anticipate that non-Adobe products will necessarily pick up this special case logic, and we do expect to revise the Adobe Type Library OpenType fonts to correct the rule format, once the next version of InDesign has been out for a few months
The special case logic is documented in the FDK Release Notes, under build 5959. The special case is triggered when a font matches the following criteria:
if (the name table name id (1,0,0,5) exists:
if the name ID string matches the regular expression
"OTF[^;]+;PS[^;]+;Core 1\.0\.[23][0-9].*":
the font has In Design 2.0 format
else if the e name ID string matches the regular expression
"Core[^;]*;makeotf\.lib":
the font has In Design 2.0 format
else the font has the correct format.
Example of string 1: "OTF 1.006;PS 1.004;Core 1.0.35"
Example of string 2: "Core 1.0.38;makeotf.lib1.5.4898"
Another example of string 2:"Core;makeotf.lib"
Fonts built with FontLab by default have name id 5 strings in the format of example 1, although it is possible to change the value.

I noticed two minor things with the windows version of MakeOTF.
* If a fatal error occurs when using the GUI mode for compiling, the output zero sized binary otf is locked in the file system until you exit the application. This doesn't happen when using the command line interface since the application process always is terminated after each compilation.
* When using the command line interface, or when executing MakeOTF from a script, the "parsing warnings" argument "+w" seems not to be piped to the compiler library after invoking MakeOTF. The "parsing warnings" argument works fine when calling a fpr project file from a script or when compiling in GUI mode.
/mårten

Student version of Adobe Photoshop CS3 Extended version question!

My school is now offering the student version of CS3 Extended. Is there any difference at all in the student version versus a full retail version? Any help is appreciated!!!!!!

If history is any indicator, the educational version should be exactly the same as the commercial version.
http://kb.adobe.com/selfservice/viewContent.do?externalId=kb402371
"Many Adobe products have versions created especially for the Education market. The Education versions of Adobe products are fully functional and identical to the retail versions, although there might be differences in packaging or marketing."
"For example, sometimes retail products include promotional software (such as free fonts or clip art) not included with the Education version. Additionally, because Education products are already discounted, they may not qualify for other pricing discounts offered to non-Education customers."Oh, and before I forget:

Bold contents in Adobe Indesign CS3

Hi there, I would like to know how to locate and use the bold command in Adobe Indesign CS3.

@Serika – just that what Peter said. But in some situations it does not work at all or yield "wrong" results. It all depends how many styles of your font family are available or fell in the category "Bold" weight.
One positive example is "Times New Roman" where four variants are present: "Regular", "Italic", "Bold" and "Bold Italic".
One intermediate example is "Warnock Pro" where more than four font variants are in the family.
It works for you to set "Regular" to "Bold" and back, but it won't work setting "Light" to "Bold" with the keyboard shortcuts.
Also, you could not get "Semibold" if you like to.
One negative example out of many is "Hiragino Kaku Gothic Pro", where there is no "Regular" or "Bold" face, just "W3" or "W6". With that font you cannot switch from "W3" to "W6" with a keyboard shortcut.
(And there are thousands of other fonts out, that are not working the way you are expecting it).
Conclusion:
Always work with Character Styles.
And apply Keyboard Shortcuts to them.
Uwe

Embedding an Adobe font using Cufon

Hi all, I need some clear clarification from Adobe or someone in the know on whether I can legally embed a font like VAG Rounded which has a 'Print & Preview' license using a technique such as Cufon (similar to sIFR)? The Cufon website (http://cufon.shoqolate.com/generate/) suggests that all Adobe fonts are 'Known to be safe' but I'd like to be sure to be sure!

I have been researching this for a while, to no avail. Adobe is probably freaking out about the possible, unforeseen implications of a blanket "Sure, go ahead" statement.
Legalese Mumbo Jumbo
Reading through their SLA, Section 14.7.4 states (emphasis added):
You may convert and install the font software into another format for use in other environments, subject to the following conditions: A computer on which the converted font software is used or installed will be considered as one of your Permitted Number of Computers. Use of the font software you have converted will be pursuant to all the terms and conditions of this agreement. Such converted font software may be used only for your own customary internal business or personal use and may not be distributed or transferred for any purpose, except in accordance with Section 4.4 of this agreement.
Section 4.4 simply states that you can't transfer the "software" unless you forfeit your claims to it (ie. sharing).
What's clear:
You can convert the font: The Cufón Generator converts your fonts to another format.
You can put the converted font on your web server: it's just another "permitted" computer.
What's not so clear:
What in the world does "customary internal" use mean? I'm convinced that this is superseded by Section 14.7.5 (see below)
Just because you can put the font on your web server, doesn't mean you can make it available to the rest of the world. I'm convinced that the Cufón version, with it's attempts at domain-level restrictions and font subsetting, is not "distributing" the font. Bad people will always try to steal and always have some level of success. If they steal the font from my personal or business computer, am I guilty of "distributing"? So what is the difference between my web server and my laptop at Starbucks? They are both "permitted" computers, they are both accessible to the public, and neither of them are actively "handing over" Adobe's intellectual property.
Is "embedding" the key?
Section 14.7.5 states:
You may embed copies of the font software into your electronic documents for the purpose of printing and viewing the document. If the font software you are embedding is identified as “licensed for editable embedding” on Adobe’s website at http://www.adobe.com/type/browser/legal/embeddingeula.html, you may also embed copies of that font software for the additional purpose of editing your electronic documents. No other embedding rights are implied or permitted under this license.
A web page is an electronic document. It is intended for printing and viewing. If you don't allow your visitors to edit your page, it seems like you could ignore the "additional purpose of editing your electronic documents".
This isn't a formal legal opinion; Adobe are you listening?
Proceed at your own risk. Clearly, I'm not a lawyer or an official Adobe spokesperson. That being said, unless Adobe takes a stand on this issue, they are losing out on a potential revenue stream. Why? Because they either miss the opportunity to sell "web page embeddable" licenses OR their fonts get converted into clones and freely distributed all around the 'net. That last point includes the ability to produce print products in addition to web page rendering.
Adobe, sIRF is NOT the answer. It can be decompiled and the fonts extracted. Flash is NOT always an acceptable solution for the web. I have a ton of money invested in fonts, money I have willingly parted with. Just give us a sign that doesn't require lawyers and courts to interpret.
Push this issue!
Fonts on the web were one of the first complaints of early web designers. Now, we can do some amazing and previously unthinkable things, yet the crown jewel is missing.

Are the Adobe fonts that supports Greek works or not?

Dear All,
I'm looking for a greek support fonts, so I searched the Adobe fonts and reached this page:
http://store1.adobe.com/cfusion/store/html/index.cfm?store=OLS-US&event=searchFonts&type=c ategory&code=greek&cat=classification
I than copied 3 words I received in Greek and paste them into the "Enter sample Text" and pressed on the "View" button.
These are the words:
Αφιερωμένο σε όλους
Almost all results came with question marks instead of Greek Characters.
So,
Are these fonts supports Greek or not?
Thank you
shlomit

Hi Schlomit,
I don't have the Adobe Text Pro to test, but of the others I see listed outside collections in the screen shot, the only one that failed to show all of your characters was my version of Trajan Pro, which actually surprised me since it's based on classical Greek.

Is Adobe Fonts All included

Is Adobe Fonts All included in the Adobe CreativeSuite or is a seperate application needing to be purchased in addition to the creative suite?

There is no Adobe Story Premium, it is Adobe Story Plus that is included with the Creative Cloud paid subscription.
From the Adobe Story FAQ here http://www.adobe.com/products/story-plus/faq.html
What versions of Adobe Story are available and how do they differ?
Adobe Story is available in two versions, each of which offers advantages over other scriptwriting software:
• Adobe Story Free is professional screenwriting software available free on Adobe.com, providing standard writing tools that automatically format your script as you type. Write for various types of projects using customizable script templates and multicolumn scripts. Import scripts written in Final Draft, Movie Magic Screenwriter, and Microsoft Word. Access your projects anywhere you have an Internet connection.
• Adobe Story Plus is a complete, collaborative scheduling and preproduction solution. Stay on time and on budget with additional features not available in Adobe Story Free. Generate up-to-date schedules and production reports from script metadata, including tags created automatically or manually. Work on your projects online as well as offline by using the Adobe Story Plus desktop application. Stay in sync with your team using collaboration features such as Share Projects.

Adobe fonts not accessible in Word 2011, Word 2016 for MAC

Adobe fonts don't appear correctly in new Word 2016 for Mac (and there are problems with Word 2011, too). For example, I have Adobe Garamond Regular, Bold, Italic, and BoldItalic installed (I had uninstalled Semibold and SemiboldItalic because I wanted the "Bold" to appear as Bold and not Semibold when selecting "Bold" in Word). But in Word 2016, when selecting Adobe Garamond, there's no true bold or true bold italic when I select "Bold" and/or "Italic" (nor is Adobe Garamond Bold listed as a separate, standalone font in the menu)-- only regular and italic. Same thing with Adobe Caslon Pro. I've had similar issues with Word 2011 for Mac -- oftentimes the true Bold and BoldItalic for Adobe Garamond won't work. But I can fix the issue by trashing the Office 2011 font cache and then restarting Word. I can't seem to identify any such workaround for Word 2016. (I realize this sounds like an Office or Mac issue, but it only happens with Adobe fonts.)
Interestingly, if I reinstall Adobe Garamond Semibold and Semibold Italic, Word 2016 will give me true Semibold and SemiboldItalic when I select "Bold" and "Italic" in Word. But true Bold and BoldItalic are nowhere to be found.
Thanks.

Have you tried contacting Microsoft about this since the fonts obviously appear in FontBook, Adobe applications, and applications other than Office without a problem. The fact that clearing the Office 2011 font cache seems to eliminate the problem for you there would be indicative of this being a Microsoft issue, not an Adobe issue.
- Dov

I'm using Adobe font Minion Pro and I need a small customization done. What is the process?

My project involves transliteration from Hebrew to English. The standard denotation for certain Hebrew letters that do not have a direct equivalent in the English alphabet requires a that a dot be placed underneath the English letter (particularly the letters 'H' and 'V').
The Adobe font Minion Pro offers hundreds of glyphs of alternative letter formats, including many letters with a dot underneath, just not the two letters that I need.
Is there any ways to get this font customized to offer these two letters with a dot underneath in all the style options (i.e., capital, lower-case, bold, italics, etc.)?
Is there an alternative? Perhaps a similar-looking font offers the glyphs in question or maybe there is a way to manipulate the font to meet my requirements i.e., there is a glyph for a dot that sits beneath the letters but it takes up its own space, maybe I could type it in the same space as a letter?
I've never used the forum before and I don't even know if anyone will see this.
Any and all help is much appreciated.
Thanks,
Sammy

With regards to Mike Wenzloff's response in terms of the license for Adobe fonts, unlike many other font foundries, Adobe does not prohibit you from making alterations of a font for your own use, whether changing individual glyphs, adding glyphs, deleting glyphs, changing or adding font metrics, and/or conversions to other font types.
Having said that, modifying a standard font is not a particularly prudent idea unless you contract witht he original font foundry to make such modifications. Why? Virtually all commercial font editing software is lossy, even if you don't change font types. The lossiness often occurs in the hinting since most font editors only retain the font shapes from the original font, not the hinting information.
More importantly, the needs expressed by sammyoziel, the original poster in this thread, are very real yet fairly simple. Effectively, he wants to make the equivalent of compound glyphs. The most common example of this is to portray the sound of the Hebrew letter Chet which is the gutteral h sound, often represented in Western Latin languages using ch. Of course, ch is more commonly used for the actual ch sound as in child.
I've seen two methods of dealing with these Hebrew letters with no Western Latin equivalent. The first is what sammyoziel suggests, putting a dot under the character. The other method is to simply use the underscore. For example, use h to represent the chet sound. That requires no modification to any fonts at all and is probably the simplest and safest way of accomplishing what you need.
If you must use the first method (and I have personally had to do this a number of times), I would most strongly recommend against trying to add glyphs to the font. What Unicode values would you use? How would you key them? And you would end up with a non-standard set of fonts. I would recommend that you simply use two glyphs. In the case of the h with a dot underneath, I would first key the h and then the period character. Custom kern the two glyphs such that the period is centered with the h. Then custom lower the glyph such that it is beneath the h. You may also need to do a custom kerning with the following letter or perhaps, insert an extra non-breaking space (see which space width works best) after the period.
- Dov

Bold versions of Adobe fonts

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for