BOM explosion not done for externally procured item.

Hi Experts,
We have done MRP run for finish goods which is creating planned orders for HALB material, but it is not further exploding the BOM of HALB material, so we are not getting any planned order/pur requisition for ROH. Plz help me out asap.

Hi,
When you run MRP for an externally procured item say - HALB , proposals will be generated say-planned order for ext proc for that item and the BOM will not be exploded further.

Similar Messages

BOM explosion not done because there is no free item number anymore

Hello,
I have a problem with BOM explosion when creating a sales order.
All the following actions are done with VA01 :
- I enter a material (main item 10) with a rejection reason, so the BOM explosion is not done :OK.
- Then I add the same material (main item 20) without rejection code, so the BOM explosion is done, it means sub items 21, 22., ...,31,32 are determined:OK
- Finally, I remove the rejection code on item 10, the problem is that there is no place anymore to do the BOM explosion because I have 12 sub items (10 +12 = 22 and it is not possible as I have already an item 20).
I have a popup with message V1-142 (There are not enough item numbers free for a structure explosion).
I know that it is possible to change the increment with VOV8, but my customer want to keep this one: 10 by 10 for main item and 1 by 1 for sub item.
He told me that he think that there is a user exit in order to put the remaining sub items at the end of the sales order like this
10 main item A
11 sub item 1 (A)
12 sub item 2 (A)
19 sub item 9 (A)
20 second main item (B)
21 sub item 1 (B)
22 sub item 2 (B)
32 sub item 12 (B)
33 sub item 10 (A)
34 sub item 11 (A)
35 sub item 12 (A)
Maybe it's a strange idea, but could you please tell me what are the different possibilities to manage sub items when there is no place to put them :
- put a higher increment in VOV8? Ok but my customer don't agree
- other solutions?
Thanks.

Hello,
Did you ever find a solution for this? The notes mentioned in the earlier post dont appear to be relevent for 6.0.
I have a similar issue when dealing with Cross Sell items. When it tries to insert the additional items I get the V1142 message, then the items are copied at the end of the list but the higher level item reference is incorrect for the cross sell items.
I do not want to change the increments but it appears to be the only option.
Any ideas are appreciated.

For Externally Procured Materials (ex - ROH) - SG's are maintained or not?

Hello
Do I need to maintain SG's ( like SG10, 40, 70) for ROH as these are externally procured?
As I see since ROH are externally procured, no need to maintain the SG (10, 40, 70,etc) in MRP 3 view of the ROH* material master as SG's (10, 40, 70)* are meant for maintianing PIRS & PIRs means it is inhouse production
Iam not limiting myself to SG's (10,40, 70) for ROH, instead any SG need not be maintained for ROH (externally procured)
If I want to see that ROH materials get consumed by the FERT then maintain SG 40/70 for the FERT/HALB (inhouse production) that should consume the ROH (externally procured)
Questions:
Q.For externally procured materials do I need to maintain the SG?
Q. If no need to maintain SG's for externally procured materials then what fields do I need to maintain to see that externally procured material which are used in the finished product gets consumed by sales orders?
Please clarify
Thank You

Pradeep
Thank you for your reply & time
If the component is semifinished & is externally procured, then following settings needs to be maintained
Procurement Type : F
Special Procurement Key : 30 (subcontracting)
But Subcontracting(30) is used when we want semifinshed product to be manufactured outside the company from a raw material issued by the company
& control key we maintain is PP02
In above scenario, then we go for subcontracting or else we need not maintain the subcontracting
Please clarify
In your answer (" u have to set Individual/coll = 1 or blank at MRR of Down level material.")
what does MRR stand for
Due points have been assigned

MRP RUN- KIT BOM explosion not working

We setup one layer BOM’s for our maintenance KITs as parent material and components as child material. For example KIT is TS10000-K1 and components are TS10001, TS10002 etc setup as next layer with in the BOM. Both KITS and components are defined as material types ERSA (Spare parts). These one layers BOMs are setup as production BOMs and expected to create purchase requisitions for KITS and components by exploding BOMs during MRP runs. We use purchase requisitions and convert them into POs to procure both KITS and components. We DO NOT USE Panned orders and Production orders.
The safety stocks / reorder point are considered as demand for KITS and components as we do not have any external demand for KITS and components.
MRP run is creating purchase requisitions automatically for both KITS and components as per safety stocks and reorder point defined in MRP Views of Material Master. This is working as expected.
The issue is: KIT BOM’s are not exploding to generate purchase requisitions for the dependent components of KIT BOM. Please suggest the way to resolve this issue.
Split valuation: Also we plan to use split valued KITS with both new and refurbished. So we need BOM explosion for split valued KITS
also (after the 1st issue is resolved).
I verified the following items to make sure the required configuration and data setup is defined correctly.
1) Planning file activated Plant - OMDU
2) Executed MRP run with Total Planning - MDBT and MD02 (single item, multiple levels)
3) BOM explosion for MRP activated- OS23
4) MRP type in MRP1 view- PD and VB (I tried both separately but BOM is not exploding).
5) Procurement type “F” (MRP 2 view) and lot size “EX”
6) Planning strategy in MRP 3 view (tested w/o planning strategy and with strategies 10 and 40. But BOM is not exploded)
7) BOM status and usage (status is active and usage is for production-CS02 and OS20)
8) BOM Validity date (Valid)
9) BOM structure in CS12 (BOM is exploding in CS11)
10) Availability check
11) Selection of BON ID to have BOM usage indicator assign (OS31).
12) No alternate BOMs or production versions or work scheduling view are used.
Please review the above 2 issues and suggest any workable solution. Thanks in advance!
NOTE: I extensively used MRP with multi-level BOM explosion in my earlier projects without any issue. However the above issue is a bit strange why one layer BOM is not exploded in this case.
Regards
Srini

Hi
Thanks for your response. I reviewed all SAP notes and none of them are applicable to my scenario.
1808396 - BOM changes not considered by MRP: I have not changed BOMs.
1781324 - MD11: Valid BOM alternative is not found. We do not have alternative BOMs.
1791009 - No BOM explosion after changing production version: We am not using production versions.
Our Material KITS are PM spare assemblies set up as BOMs and consists of individual spare parts as components. We are creating purchase requisitions and not planned orders. We are not using PP functionality/Production orders.
MRP is generating purchase requisitions for KITS and components as per ROP and safety stocks. In other words it is working as expected. The issue is BOMs which are parent assemblies are not exploding to the next lower level components.
Please note that I am not getting any error messages when MRP is executed.
Regards
Srini.

Limit PO Err Combination of GR/IR control not allowed for external services

Hi,
I am having a problem while replicating free text Limit PO's to R/3 in SRM 4.0 SP 13. The issue is while creating Free Text Limit SC with the "Confirmation and Invoice" option checked in, the PO's get created in SRM but fails while replicating to R/3 and in RZ20 errors as "Combination of GR/IR control not allowed for external services" although in vendor master i don't have check for the field "GR-Based Invoice Verification".
On the contrary while creating SC with the "Invoice Only" the PO is successfully replicated to R/3 with item category as B for limit orders.
Now i have noticed if i make changes in the vendor master data i.e. check the flag "GR-Based Invoice Verification" then the PO in my first scenario gets replicated successfully and also with respect to the second scenario but it gets replicated in both the scenarios as item category "D".
As far as SRM standard it should have ideally behave like the below:
Limit SC with GR AND Invoice -> item category D
Limit SC with invoice only -> item category B.
Now my question is why do my PO's fail in R/3 in the first scenario and also if i check the flag in vendor master for GR-Based Invoice verification then in the second scenario the item category is "D" instead of "B".
Thanks in Advance.
Best Regards
Anirban

Hi Georg,
We don't have any active implementation for the BADI BBP_PO_INBOUND_BADI.
Best Regards,
Anirban

MRP - Create Planned Orders only for Externally Procured Materials

Dear All,
We have a scenario that our client gives us the daily requirement schedule for the current month and a monthly forecast for future months so that we can plan our externally procured materials based on the forecast.
Now I only want the MRP run to create Planned Orders for HALB and FERT based on my current months daily schedule and planned orders for ROH (Externally Procured) based on the next months forecast (monthly).
I dont want the system to create planned orders for HALB and FERT from the forecast. The requirement for the ROH are however derived from the Finished Good BOM and the forecast is also given for the FERT material. I know its a long shot but is there a possibility in the system to do such a thing or a work around?

Your business case is not clear; MRP will create planned orders for inhouse produced materials, and either planned orders or purchase requisitions for external procurement.
You can choose to convert or release external procurement for a long time ahead (eventhough taht if you have proper lead times defined you can release by lead time), but convert inhouse planned orders to production orders only for next period (week, month). Actually this is common practice.
So I fail to understand your problem.

Limit PO :Combination of GR/IR is not allowed for external services

Hi,
we are working in SRM40 sp09 & back end ECC.50
In the Limit PO:
we are able to create Limit PO from a shopping cart.The follow on documents in ECC, it is creating a PO with Item category "B" and the "invoices" are only possible.
The Issue:
The Client wants the Confirmation/GR functionality to be enabled and the Invoices.
but for Limit PO, with follow on documents--"Confirmation" is checked, we have a error messagecombination of GR/IR is not allowed for external services".
Is there any addition configuration or steps involved.
Thanks and Regards,
RK.

Hi
<b>Please go through the links below, which address the same issue -></b>
Limit PO(Item category D instead of B)
SRM: Item category B/D for limit PO
Re: Problem with Unknown account assignment with limit order...reply soon...
Do let me know.
Regards
- Atul

Hello everyone, I have a problem when I sync my apple device. I plug it in and a message comes up saying, this device could not be synced because this computer is not authorized for the purchased items on this phone. I already tried to authorize again.

Hello everyone, I have a problem when I sync my apple device. I plug it in and a message comes up saying, this device could not be synced because this computer is not authorized for the purchased items on this phone. I already tried to authorize again, after deautherizing it. HELP ME PLEASE

Hi applerinneedforhelp,
Thanks for visiting Apple Support Communities.
If iTunes is asking you to authorize the computer, and you've already done so, the troubleshooting steps in this article can help:
iTunes repeatedly prompts to authorize computer to play iTunes Store purchases
http://support.apple.com/kb/ts1389
Regards,
Jeremy

KANBAN for external Procurement and Purchase order

Good morning
I am working with kanban for external procurement
Through PKBC-transaction I set "empty status" and SAP creates the purchase order
is it possible to create 1 purchase order about 2 or more item?
in which way?
thanks

Hi,
Thanks for reply... Can you breif me the procedure to achieve it..In material master, where i need to mention it....
Regards,
Subhash

Combination of GR/IR control not allowed for external services

Hi,
I need to uncheck the field GR-Based IV (EKPO-WEBRE) in the SERVICE PO but I receive the message :
"Combination of GR/IR control not allowed for external services"
I want to allow the user to receive Invoices (MIRO) before the Service Entry (ML81N).
Thanks.
Carlos Durazo

HI,
This is a "hard coded" option and cannot be removed.
If you want to be able to post invoices for services before the GR (acceptance) then you could consider using "normal" POs for these (without item category "D") abd use material masters (DIEN material type) or describe the service in text.
External services POs are only really suited to complex services or services that need a two step GR process (Service entry and acceptance).
Far too many organisations use the service entry sheet option when "normal POs" would be far better.
Steve B

MRP planning for external procurement

Dear all,
How do i make my system, upon MRP, trigger a purchasing requisition for external procurement of a external 3rd-party vendor?
How to setup this in the system and master data?
thanks,
tuffy

Dear Tuffy,
For all the externally procured items,maintain the procurement type as F in MRP2 view.
Maintain Purchase Info record for the material and vendor combination in ME11 and then assign the vendor for the material,plant
combination in the source list in ME01.
In this case the Purchase Info Record should be created for standard Info Record.
In the case of sub-contracting assign the procurement type as F and special procurement value as 30 in the MRP 2 view of the
material master and create Subc-ntracting Purchase Info Record in ME11 and assign the vendor in source list in ME01and source
list usage as 2 in both the cases.
The above sub-contracting is assembly sub-contracting process.
Check and revert
Regards
S Mangalraj

Posting in foreign currency not allowed for external tax system

Hello all,
I created a purchase order for inter-company stock transfer. Then created a corresponding outbound delivery and goods issue using VL10h and completed goods issue. Then I completed good receipt using MIGO. When I was trying to create a sales order I got this message "Posting in foreign currency not allowed for external tax system". What could be the reasons for this message. The message number said FS885.
One final note. I am able to create Billing document with manual batch number input in Delivery document item. But when I am using Batch split I am not able to generate invoice. Can anyone tell me what could be the problem here.

Hi Samir,
The Goods Received NI (Allocation Cost Account) need to be balaned in Local and System Currency as this is a Multi Currency account and these are the currencies that Business One will offer reports in.
The Foreign Currency for this account is irrelevant as you can never get a balance in FC for a multi currency account, neither will you find any reports for this.
If the client insists you can create a manual Journal entry in FC only to correct this. Business One does not offer any functionality to correct the Foreign Currency in this scenario. (like Exchange Rate difference for Local Currency and Conversion Differences for System Currency)
To do the manual JE open the form settings and the tab 'table', here untick the box 'From FC Field'. This will enable you to create a FC JE only.
Hope it clarifies the issue.
Jesper

Cross Plant Planning for External procured Material in MRP with their stock

Dear Gurus,
I have one requirement my client want Cross plant planning in MRP. this plants are only site plants no Manufacturing. All materials in these plants are Externally Procure Materials(F). Now they want cross plant planning for Externally Procure Materials or cross plant planning for Externally Procure Materials with consider all plant stock details while planning.
can you tell me procedure for this,
Thanks in advance,
Regards,
Devraj

Hi,
In R/3 you cannot consider all plants in planning, you have to use SAP APO to achieve your goal (if your goal is to optimize the procurement in your plants). When you execute MRP run in R/3 it will only consider the details of one single plant.
I mean if you have several plants used for external procurement, and you want to make an optimal decision considering all the stocks and open transactional data, requirements in those plants, it is not possible in R/3 as per my knowledge - multi site/plant planning won't give you such optimal solutiion.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/f4/7d2d4d44af11d182b40000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_apo/helpdata/en/7e/63fc37004d0a1ee10000009b38f8cf/frameset.htm
Regards,
Csaba
Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Nov 17, 2008 10:27 AM

Schdelung for externally procured material.

Dear Gurus,
We have defined planned delivery time for externally procured material. After MRP run system is generating delivery dates for that.
We want if there is capacity constraint at supplier's end then how to handle this issue in MRP run.
Example -
PR generated after MRP run for XXX material code for 5000 kg and required date is 15/06/2009.
Supplier's manufacturing capaicty of this material is 500/day i.e. from today he will be produced only 3500kg.
In case shop floor plan will not executed due to shortage of supplies.
How to map this scenario in SAP so that MRP controller will come know that the said material will not be available on required date and he will have plan some thing else during that period.
Regards,
Abhay

Have you tried with Lot SIze Data in MRP 1 view
you can give 500 in Maximum Lot Size
and lot size as per your business need for example 7 days no split quota something like that
After MRP run, your planner can see the next material expected availablity and plan the production
otherwise, if company permits for surplus inventory , then keep some buffer as Safety stock and plan accordingly
Edited by: deshamol on Jun 9, 2009 12:59 PM

Depot Sales - Goods issue not done for the delivery

Hello Experts,
I am trying to capture a Excise Invoice in the Depot Sales Process TCode - J1IJ.
I am getting the follwoing message - GI not done for the Delivery.
Process which we are following here is
Depot
SO - Delivery - Picking - Packing - J1IJ - Shipment creation - Shipment Planning - Loading Start - Shipment Start (Will do PGI) - Shipment end (Will create invoice & Excise Invoice).
Excise invoice is captured during MIGO at Depot.
Can you please suggest..
Thanks & regards
Mahesh

Hi mahesh
Change the process to following manner
Depot
SO - Delivery - Picking - Packing - Shipment creation - Shipment Planning - Loading Start - Shipment Start (Will do PGI) - Shipment end -J1IJ(Will create invoice & Excise Invoice).
u r problem will be solved.
Regards
kedasu.a

BOM explosion not done for externally procured item.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for