BOM Product Structure

Hi Gurus,
I have multi-level assembly ,in which some of the BOM components are text items. In tcode CSMB- BOM product structutre display the text items are not shown. I tried to change the layout,but could not figure it out. Is there is a solution for this?
Thanks you all.
PP_6.0

Hi,
I had checked using text item in a bom.
I got it in CSMB, CS11 & also in the production order.
Pl. check the item category, com explosion options in spro.
Regards,
Senthilkumar SD

Similar Messages

BOM Table Structure

Hi all
I am working in an automobile company, which manufactures luxury buses. I have to develop BOM for these buses. At present there is no system. Can somebody please help me in building data dictionary for BOM of an automobile Company.
I also have to keep track of Engineering Change Notice. But this is my second issue.
Any help in this matter will be appreciated.
Thanks,
Priya...

I am working in an automobile company, which manufactures luxury buses.I am just wondering are you people not using any ERP application in your company.???
Its not possible to answer your question in forum since you need a application from end to end.
My suggestion is if you are using any ERP then you can use Product Structure/Bill Of Material module in that and you can customize the application based on your requirement.
Thanks,
Suri

Using Product Structure for checking out originals of child DIR's

I have a requirement of creating a package of documents.
Some of my DIR's are linked to service notification, some are linked to Purchse Order, & some are linked to Sales order.....
Each service notification, PO, SO is linked to one master DIR, so that they can be seen under Product Structure.
Is there any method to extract(Check Out) all the originals of all these DIR's at one place using Product structure.
Or can we atleast create a link between Master DIR and all child DIR's.
Please giude me.
Points for sure.

Hi,
as far as I know there is no way to check out a product structure, but you can check out a document structure.
If you DIR has a bill of documents, you can use the BAPI CheckOutView2. The parameter GetStructure determines weather the structure is read or not.
- GetStructure = 0 Document structure is not read
- GetStructure = 1 Document structure is exploded one level
- GetStructure = 2 Document structure is exploded completely
Regards Iring

Product structure browser in portal

Hi all,
Do you know something about a product browser, a tool to navigate in a product structure in a portal application ? I found a component (an old BSP ) link to IPPE but what i'm looking for is rather something my old CC04 in SAP R/3.
Anyone knows a tool which can be used in a SAP portal ?
Thank a lot by advance.
Pierre

Hi,
I did not get the question clearly. Are you looking for a ready made tool that could be customized or configured?
I know of a Webdynpro for Java tutorial - Tree structure, that can used to build up application to show up product structure. Hope that helps.
Cheers!!
SR

CV03n modification in product structure

In CV03N Transaction we can see product structure.
There in the product tree, Source document is displyed.
Is there any way that we can stop the source document from appearing in the product structure?

Hi Anup,
You could also try FM PVSHI_PNCMP_READ.
Add the Node_ID to table componentnodedata. The table componentrelation will give you all the relationships (downward and upward).
Regards, Frans

Product Structure Configuration

All,
We would like to partially disable CC04 from transaction MM03. The menu patth is MM03>Environment>Product Structure. We would like to disable the right click capability from installing one equipment to another. Are there any OSS notes or fixes that can help us?
Thanks,
Tai

Lekhram & Yogesh
Going into the material master via MM03 there is an option under the Environments pull-down known as Product Structure. Selecting this opens up access to what looks exactly like the Product Structure Browser transaction CC04. In there it is allowing drag and drop of one equipment to another. If a user
inadvertent moved an equipment into another equipment by doing the drag and drop, it open up a security vulnerability. We have tried to lock up the CC04 transaction but the user still have the access to do so thru MM03 transaction.
In additiona to that, we had customized another tarnsaction that is similar to CC04 for a limited authorized users.
Thanks for your help.

CRM Standalone: Single Level BOM for Structured Product

Hi there,
   I am working on CRM 5.0 Standalone. I have made a structured product.
   Header Product: Prod1 (Item Cat Group: LUMF)
   Component Product: Prod2 (Item Cat group: NORM)
   I have copied item category TAP (for prod 1) and TAN. (For prod 2)
   I am not able to run single level BOm in Sales transaction Type.
   Could u Please let me know how to specify the ITEM CAT DETERMINATIOn Pro.
   I mean the values one shud have for: (in Item Cat Determination ptoc )
   Transaction Type: (I have put my sales tran)
    Item Cat Group:    Structred Below
    Item cat usage   (EMPTY)
    Main Item Cat      (empty)
    Item cat              ZTAP (copied from TAP)
    Alt Item cat         ZTAN (copied for TAN without Pricing).
   Could u help me with the correct set of entries here so that i may be able to see the BOm in sales transaction.
Note IS BOM possible without the pricing data at the sub item level.
Imp: Pls answer ASAP. ....urgent would award Points
Thanks,

Hi Leon,
     I have done it, but it does not work.
     I am getting the error as "No Item Catagory could be created"
     WIsh to know if Pricing has to be necessary here for BOM.
      Or any changes u want to suggest in the Prod master.
     just to describe the product again its
    Prod 1 ( header product) Material, Item cat group : LUMF, Base unti of measure: EA.
    Prod 2 . ( Sub item) Material, Item cat group : NORM, Base unti of measure: EA.
    FINALLY linked thru relationship Prod 2 is ACCESSORY of PROD 1
Regards

Follow-up question on BOM production and consumption of same item

Awhile back, I asked the question about whether it made sense to have a BOM structured to simultaneously produce and consume an item. BOM that needs to produce and consume same component
Thanks for the help and it does what I thought it should. We have a local difference of opinion on the consumption of primary components, though. To attempt to ensure that we account for the bleed-off of materials into a vacuum system, we set up a BOM like this
Material A    498.379
Material B    332.253
Material C     14.914
Material D     22.371
Material E     64.317
Material F    103.570
Material F     -35.804 (This is the quantity vacuumed away, treated as by-product.)
to cover a recipe card structured like this
Material A    481.150
Material B    320.775
Material C     14.400
Material D     21.600
Material E     62.100
Material F     100.00
The difference of opinion is whether to recognize the reclaimed material (Material F) at all on the BOM, with a minority saying that we will not consume (and therefore not order) enough of materials A through E. They say that "you have to put the same amount of good ingredients in as you produce because it's a closed loop system".
So the other approach would be a BOM like this
Material A    534.252
Material B    357.852
Material C     15.840
Material D     23.760
Material E     68.310
The material reclaimed (Material F) is sourced not only from this particular vacuum system, but from other vacuum systems outside the blending operation.
It seems to me that the first approach is correct, because we recognize consumption and production of the reclaimed item, and proportionately increase the component items to recognize that more are needed than will go out as good product. Even the reclaim becomes reclaim. The amounts vacuumed off seem to be consistent at 3.57%.
Which approach is correct?

Thank you for the reply. The reclaimed material can be as much as 11% of the total material made. Last year, over one million kilograms were worked back into the product as reclaim, and the metals are somewhat expensive (not like precious metals, but they are not trivial, either).
Accuracy versus precision is always something to consider, but I think it's important enough to follow, especially because it is sourced from several processes. The sourcing from the other sources means that the reclaimed material from those sources has already been reported as production of the primary product which consumes the virgin materials, so I think it should be re-introduced into the flow as a separate item (Material F)
The primary argument I want to settle is the business about how we won't order enough component materials if we use the BOM that shows simultaneous production and consumption. I think under the approach in which we ignore the reclaim, we will consume more components from the backflush location than we physically use and would then order too much material because of using a BOM that pulls only virgin materials.

Query related to selection of BOM (Production BOM or Sales Order BOM)

Hello All
Am having a scenario wherein the FG is having 5 components out of these 5, two are subassembly and 3 are raw materials, 3 of these components are customer specific i.e. 1 suby assly and 2 raw materials are customer order specific, now what i wanna know is that how shall i decide the BOM, will it be a Sales Order BOM or normal Production BOM. If i go for a Sales Order BOM, can any body tell me the processing of Sales order BOM. For the above FG the packing materials are also cutomer specific and that too is included in BOM. Any help in this regard shall be highly appreciated.
Regards,
J K Tharwani

Thanks for your reply.
I would like to know am using strategy 52 for this FG, so that i can have option to procure order specific components after sales order arrival, and components which are not specific to the order can be procured before sales order arrival. Where am confused is if am planning with FG1 i.e. am entering PIR for FG1 and am procuring order independent components before sales order arrival and suppose if the sales order arrives for FG2 for which components i have procured before sales order arrival is same but the remaining components which are order specific are different from that of FG1, then how the MRP shall behave. How the requirement for the FG2 shall be met. Kindly throw some light on this scenario.
Expecting a positive and prompt response.
Regards,
J K Tharwani

Product Structure Synchronzation-SAP PLM 7.02

Hello All
I need some clarification on PSS.
I have already created the M-BOM by synch' of Product variant in PSM.
The Synch Unit has the status aligned and also M-BOM is created.
Now there are some changes made in the items of the assembly used in the product variants.
1. Can I now re-run the existing synch unit so that the changes are reflected in the M-BOM
or is that I need to create new synch unit for the changes to be reflected with alternative number for the same M-BOM.
Prompt reply will be highly appreciated as I need to resolve this issue ASAP.
Cheers
Satish

Hi,
Has the assembly below the product variant been synchronized?
If yes, then of course leveraging the existing sync unit is the standard behavior.
Ulf.

Non inventory Item used in BOM/production, but i need used qty used

Hi
What type of item do i use best or how can i achieve this:
I have a license cost that is used in BOM's and therefore in production orders as well. Its cost is added to the product this way. At the end of a period, i need to know how many of the item has been used in a production. If i have set the item up as non-inventory, i don't get any statistics for the item.
Howe do i have to set up the item to get my information.
Thank
Franz

Hi Franz,
Set up this item as non inventory item should be fine since you don't need to count the item on hand. To get its qty for production, you could use query to get report.
Thanks,
Gordon

Changing materials stock according to BOM (production ?)

Hello
I'd like to implement the following business scenario:
- You have a material BOM defined in the system;
- You have some stock of materials defined as components in this BOM;
- Now you want to get some of those component materials and change their stock into
a stock of material which is the main material of the BOM (produce the main material
using its components according to BOM specification). The quantity of components used
in this process should be controlled by the data conatained in the BOM.
I guess this can be achieved by some functionality in the PP module, can you give me
an idea what process will handle such scenario ? Or an overview of what configuration should I perform or what documentation should I read ?
Thanks
regards

Hi
Inshort you just need to create an prodcution order.Pl use the T.Code CO01 to create the Production order for main material and assign the BOM to this..
Do the Goods Issue against this production Order using t.Code MB1A ( or you can use the backfluing function at the time of Prodcution Order confirmation )
Confirm the prodcution Order and do the Good Receipt..
Again you just need to follow the Production Order functionality for this..
Pl come back if you need further details..
Rewards will be appriciated..
BR
Sumit
Message was edited by:
Sumit Sharma

SP for Validating BOM & Production Order item wise

Dear Experts,
Here I am validating the Production order items with BOM for the same items, any addition or deletion in production order should not be allowed. Hence the production order should consist of same items what it has in BOM. But below the my query is allowing this scenario. Kindly help me to achieve the same..
Query Follows :
@object_type = '202' and @transaction_type in ('A','U')
if exists (SELECT distinct 'error'
FROM OITT A INNER JOIN ITT1 B ON A.Code = B.Father
LEFT JOIN OWOR C ON C.ItemCode = A.Code
LEFT JOIN WOR1 D ON D.DocEntry = C.DocEntry
LEFT JOIN OITM E ON E.ItemCode = B.Code AND D.ItemCode = B.Code
Where c.DocEntry = @list_of_cols_val_tab_del and d.ItemCode not in (select b.Code from ITT1 b))
Begin
Select @error = N'13002'
select @error_message = N'BOM Mismatch'
END
Thanks,
Bhoopathi.K

Hi,
Try this:
IF @transaction_type IN ('A', 'U')AND @object_type in ('202')
BEGIN
If exists (SELECT T0.DocEntry FROM owor T0
inner join itt1 t2 on t2.father = T0.Itemcode
where t0.DocEntry =@list_of_cols_val_tab_del AND t2.code not in (SELECT T1.itemcode FROM wor1 t1 where t0.docentry = t1.docentry))
Begin
SET @error = '202'
SET @error_message = N'order can not be added if not match with BOM.'
End
END
Thanks & Regards,
Nagarajan

About BOM & production order

hi experts,
if I have an item which has no quantity, means I don't count it in my warehouses, but I have to insert it into a BOM (BOM A)to make someone know it's necessary. what can i do to that item?
I tried to make it as a phantom item, but when I made a production order from that BOM(BOM A), system always tells me not allowing a phantom item in a BOM (BOM A), I have to make another BOM (BOM B)to contain that phantom item, can I set BOM B as a phantom item and then add to BOM A?
Thanks...

Vic
Phantom is for a different usage.
You can just set the item up as non-stock item and add it to the BOM. This way, it can even add some value specified in the item to the production cost of the BOM.
I use this to add internal work time to the production, for instance.
HTH
Franz

Regarding BOM & Production order restriction.

Hi PP Gurus,
We have a requirement wherein a user/user group should not able to change of view BOMs of some specific materials but the user should be able to see/change the BOMs for other materials.
Same requirement is for a Production order type. This production orders of this particular order type should not be created/changed/displayed to anybody other than specific users.
I have a concern about various production reports, MD04, CO24 etc. which will show production order and their quantity.
Please help.
Thanks,
Abu Arbab

Hi,
Quite an interesting need, can you let us know the need for this?
A suggestion:
I think most of these transactions check for material number, if not, you can ask your basis person to add a check for material number in the t-codes for which you need.
Now for users who need to access these sensitive materials you can assign access, for the rest you can exclude these materials. If these materials are many, maybe you can create a Z table containing these materials & check on this table.
However do a thorough check before proceeding as user can branch into different transactions, so a thorough check is required.
Regards,
Vivek

BOM Product Structure

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for