BOM STATUS only released for costing

Dear gurus ,
i need create a BOM STATUS only for CK11N ( COSTING) but when a created the new BOM STATUS whit only the flag "released for costing" but when i run the CK11N
the system don't find the bom .
Are there the other customzing setting?
Thanks a lot
Daniele Pistilli
PP TEAM

HI
Check with BOM usage 6 for your requirement.also check in OKKN for your costing variant and qty structure  control> BOM application> selection Id for your BOM
Regards
Anupam Sharma

Similar Messages

  • Function to change CATS status to released for approval

    I have a requirement where I need to change in batch cats records from status 10 to status 20 'released for approval'
    I can't find how to change the status in  BAPI_CATIMESHEETMGR_CHANGE
    and another function CATS_APPROVAL only works for approving or rejection of records.
    is there another bapi or function which I can use to change the record status of cats ?
    or the other way around is also acceptable that I can set the status back from '20' released for approval to '10' locked.
    kind regards
    arthur de smidt

    when debugging cat2 I found a form which handles the release for approval. but I'm nog sure if there is more to it. for so far I can see it updates the status directly and that's it. when I go further on I come in the screenpainter prog. any clues if it's normal to use this code for my own abap ??
    further on I don't understand the function of ASSIGN_FIELDS_IN_ICATSD ?
    can somebody explain this one ??
    include : LCATSF33
          FORM FREE_ONE_CELL                                            *
          free one cell on dynp                                         *
    FORM FREE_ONE_CELL USING U_NUMBER
                             U_WORKDATE LIKE CATSDB-WORKDATE.
    assign the correct fields
      PERFORM ASSIGN_FIELDS_IN_ICATSD USING U_NUMBER.
      IF <STATUS> = STATUS-LOCK OR <STATUS> = STATUS-REJE.
    count records
        TOTAL_RECORDS = TOTAL_RECORDS + 1.
    date in the future ?
        IF TCATS-FUTURE IS INITIAL.
          IF U_WORKDATE > SY-DATLO.
            FUTURE_RECORDS = FUTURE_RECORDS + 1.
            MESSAGE S024 WITH FUTURE_RECORDS TOTAL_RECORDS.
            EXIT.
          ENDIF.
        ENDIF.
        READ TABLE ICATSDB WITH KEY MANDT = SY-MANDT
                                    WORKDATE = U_WORKDATE
                                    COUNTER = <COUNTER>
                                    BINARY SEARCH.
        IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
          ICATSDB-STATUS = STATUS-FREE.
          IF ICATSDB-ACTION IS INITIAL.
            ICATSDB-ACTION = ACTION-UPDATE.
          ENDIF.
          MODIFY ICATSDB INDEX SY-TABIX.
          <STATUS> = STATUS-FREE.
    set global marker that data have been unlocked
          FREE_DATA = YX.
        ELSE.
          MESSAGE X030.
        ENDIF.
      ENDIF.
    ENDFORM.
    kind regards
    arthur

  • S.M.A.R.T. status only available for eSATA and ATA?

    I have S.M.A.R.T.Reporter from my mac. my recent last external crashed and i lost everything on it. had i known it was close, i might have been able to save some stuff. when i plug my new firewire drive into disk utility, it says S.M.A.R.T. Status: Not Supported. Is there any way to change that because i would really like to save my drive if possible before something bad happens

    The problem is that you machine isn't talking to the drive. It's talking to the FireWire controller in the enclosure which, in turn, is talking to the drive. Few (any?) external controllers support passing the SMART protocol over the FireWire interface bridge. The same is true for USB.
    Off hand I'm not aware of any FireWire or USB enclosures that do support SMART. I've never tried an eSATA connection to know if that works, although you may have a better chance since you are at least using the ATA protocol.

  • Issue with BOM Status in MRP Run

    Dear All,
    I have a BOM structure and BOM status as attached below.
    In this case, system is generating the PR's for all three components correctly while i run MRP (MD51). But when i convert planned order to production order for "Assembly" & "BOM", it is coping the components for Assembly correctly but not for "BOM".
    If i maintain the BOM status as "4" for "BOM", then the components are copied into Production Order but i am getting double PR's as the BOM is exploding two times.
    As per my requirement BOM should be exploded only one time ie. for "Assembly" and component should be come in Planned order for "BOM".
    Please tell me where is the problem..
    Regards,
    Rao

    Dear Rao,
    assembly and Bom have the same type of production order?
    In the production order type which application is contained? PP01?
    You should check the explosion setting in the profile order and the setting of application of the Bom.
    if you can send me screen shot of the planned order of the Bom (components details).
    Thanks
    Daniele 

  • What's the difference between task list release for order and release for c

    What's the difference between task list release for order and release for cost?

    Pallavi,
    The status of the task list determines in which other application areas the respective task list may be used.
    Release for costing: means that the task list can be used to calculate costs in Transaction IA16 i.e. the costs for the task list operations would be calculated if released for costing status is set.
    Release for use in the order: Released for Order means that you can use the task list in an order i.e. you could include operations from a task list in an order.
    Regards,
    Usman

  • Proxy messgs on ECC in scheduled status - released for processing (PI 7.1)

    Hi guys,
    I have set up a scenario (ABAP Proxy(ECC)->(using WS adapter)PI7.1->SOAP) and the outbound messages on the ECC remain in the scheduled status (green flag) saying "Released for processing (WS)". Why? Must there be some processing be executed? Manual? Or job?
    Any help on this appreciated, Olian

    Hi Olian
    Try applying the solution in the SAP note #1129614 SP2: WSRM sequences process only the first 3 messages.
    Regards
    Mark

  • ECM - History Requirement for BOM status not activated

    Hello,
    He have an issue with the warning message  displayed when we are trying to modificate an BOM (transaction CS02).
    In OS25 transaction we defined that only BOMs with "usage = 1" and "status = 3" have history requirement.
    The parameters of OS27 transaction are OK too.
    The problem is that the warning message 045 is displayed when we execute CS02 for every kind of BOM usage and status.
    We must substitute the warning message by an error message. To do that, we must disable the field NOHIS in C_STUE_NOH object, in the user profile. But, when we do that, the error message is displayed to all kind of BOMs status, blocking the process (following the warning message, which is displayed to all kind of BOM status)
    This is an issue of SAP_APPL 470 system.
    We tested the similar procedure in an SAP_APPL 603 system, and the results were OK, in other words, the warning message is only displayed for the BOM usage and BOM status defined in OS25 transaction.
    Thank's in advance

    When the BOM with usage 1 and status 3, by example, is changed with a modification number (following OS25 parameters), the field STZU-HISTK is activated.
    Then, if the status of the BOM is changed to 2, the modification number is required, because the STZU-HISTK is activated.
    In OS25 transaction only the BOm usage = 1 and BOM status = 3 has the history requirement flag, but after the modification with the mod. number, all the status of the BOM now has the modification number requirement.
    How can I allow the modification of the BOM without modification number (other status not flagged in OS25), if this BOM hal already been changed with an modification number (by the status flagged in OS25)?
    Thank's in advance

  • Precaution for releasing the cost estimate

    Hello friends,
    What are the precautions to  be taken for releasing the cost estimates.
    Like any delivery are done and invoices to to made in Sales.
    What are the other precautions. Please let me know, as we have to release the cost estimate in production.
    Regards,
    SK

    Hi,
    do you mean released to standard price?
    1: cost estimate needs status "costed without error".
    2: marking allowance in CK24 must be set for company code/period for the costing variant used.
    3: Costing variant is assigned to a costing type that allows price update to standardprice.
    4: Cost estimate is marked (without errors).
    Aftre that its possible to release the cost estimate to S-price.
    best regards, Christian

  • Report  for bom wise target and actual cost as well as qty at line item

    Dear Experts,
    Is there any standard tcode for bom wise target and actual cost as well as qty at line item level for the month.
    there is one tcode s_alr_87013127 but user has to double click in order to get line item details.
    I want to see line item wise breakup/bom wise target and cost cost as well as qty.
    Thanks in advance.
    regards
    RK

    Dear experts,
    I am still looking for a revert.
    regards
    RK

  • Error: no product cost estimation possible, at the releasing for accounting

    Hi Guru,
    while releasing for account in billing document for the finished product.Shows Error as:"no product cost estimation not allowed". Thou I cheked configuration checking of costing key in COPA and costing variant of relevant one looks fine. Plz guide me further more configuration and basic settings needed in to solve this task.
    Thanking u in advance
    Murali.

    Pawan,
    Thanks for your quick reply.
    I have done those change also, still it is coming same as " No Product cost estimate was found". check  you costing key 100 in COPA configuration. i have checked costing key configuration , in that costing varinat PPC1, Costing Version 1, Period/Indicator as "Current Standard cost estimate Acc. to entry in Material Master" .
    How to fix this, guide me
    Sateesh

  • Warning for header po delivery cost but with only free of cost items

    Dear.
    Do you know If exist a chance to send a warning If I insert in a purchase order a header delivery cost condition type but the items of this po are only free of cost ?
    Thanks.

    Dear Chris,
    As per my knowledge this cannot be done in standard SAP because
    When we create PO line item with Free goods indicator set automatically item conditions tab correctly disappears
    But the header condition tab always will be there because " In a PO you may have 6 line item out of them 3 is free goods and 3 is not " That is the reason Header conditions tab is there.
    But you don't really have to worry because if you have only 1 item with Free goods indicator set and you enter a amount for header freight you will find the field condition value by default Blank and you cannot enter a value there , so no need to worry no postings will be made.
    Now say you have PO with 3 line items (out of which1 with Free goods indicator) and you enter a header freight 100 EUR
    You will find now that field condition value is not becoming blank and the amount 100 EUR is distributed among 2 non free Goods item proportionately.
    Hope it clarifies

  • API for Work Order status from Released to Unreleased or any user defined s

    Dear All
    Is there any API for to change work order status from Released to Unreleased or any user defined status.
    Take care
    Aamir

    Hi Ben,
    As query is resolved, you should close the Thread after rewarding to the Concerned
    Thanks,
    Manish

  • Delete cost run & reset release for current month

    For our client we have created a new plant while testing this plant user created a material and they have done a cost run in ck11n  with costing varient zv01 but in they released the cost with costing varient ppc1 with this system got inconsistency and not not allowing to release cost for any other material in the current month if we try to mark it for next month it is working fine.
    we deleted the cost run through ck44 & ckr1 then also we are faceing the same problem. Kindly give me the solution how can i reset the release and later i want to run the ck11n & ck24 for material in the current month  to do  the production cycle.  please consider this is as a urgent.
    Regards
    Chakravarthy

    Hi
    Whether you should do MR21 or not ??
    a. If the cost estimate you reversed belongs to Last month and you are going to post the GR in last month then you should do MR21
    b. if the cost estimate you reversed belongs to may and GR will also be posted in May - No need for Mr21... Because, even though you release cost on say, may 2nd, the cost always gets released from the Start of the Month
    br, Ajay M

  • How to retire/archive/status a released workbench transport for an OSS note

    My Question:  Is there a best practice for the "retiring" or "archiving" or "statusing" of released workbench transports for OSS notes that have been imported into the quality environment, but should never be imported into the production environment? 
    For example an OSS note is applied and imported into QS1, but then a CRT Hotpack is applied as an entire patch upgrade, so that the prior individual transport is no longer needed.  Best Business practice indicates to not delete a released transport, but unless there is a way to permanently segregate them from the remaining legitimately viable transports, there is always a risk that the "stale" code could inadvertently slip through thus overwriting good code.

    Hello.
    Well, you have confirmed what I suspected when I read the descriptions - wrong forum. 
    I chuckled and couldn't stop a broad smile from creeping across my face when I read your response though:  "the old BASIS type questions".  I knew we were a bit behind the times here; you have definitely confirmed this suspicion.
    Thank you again.  I'll try another search of the OSS notes or put in a customer message just for the heck of it.

  • BI_PROCESS_TRIGGER event job in released status ONLY

    HI ALL,
    I WANT TO TRIGGAR PC TWICE IN DAY 5 PM AND 2AM.
    1.I CTEATED EVENT IN SM62 (ZSDPC_EVENT)
    2.I CTEATED SE 38 PROGRAM (zsdpp_pc_event_program )LIKE BELOW
    REPORT  zsdpp_pc_event_program.
    DATA: gv_time TYPE sy-uzeit,
          eventid TYPE btceventid.
    gv_time = sy-uzeit.
    eventid = 'ZSDPC_EVENT'.
    IF ( gv_time GE '170000' AND gv_time LE '170000' )
       OR ( gv_time EQ '020000' AND gv_time LE '200000' ).
      CALL METHOD cl_batch_event=>raise
        EXPORTING
          i_eventid                      = eventid
        EXCEPTIONS
          excpt_raise_failed             = 1
          excpt_server_accepts_no_events = 2
          excpt_raise_forbidden          = 3
          excpt_unknown_event            = 4
          excpt_no_authority             = 5
          OTHERS                         = 6.
      IF sy-subrc <> 0.
        MESSAGE ID sy-msgid TYPE sy-msgty NUMBER sy-msgno
                   WITH sy-msgv1 sy-msgv2 sy-msgv3 sy-msgv4.
      ENDIF.
    ENDIF.
    3.I SPECIFIED AFTER EVENT IN MANAIN VARIANT .ACTIVATED AND SCHEDULED PC
    4. THEN RUNE THIS PRORGAM IN SM36
    BUT MY PROBLEM IS IN SM37 JOB BI_PROCESS_TRIGGER event job in released status ONLY
    please guide me if i am wrong .
    REGARDS,
    KP

    It is supposed to be in Released status.
    The BI_PROCESS_TRIGGER job is scheduled to run based upon the event being triggered (from your ABAP program).  The only thing this job does is trigger the event that runs the next process in your process chain.  If you set up the Start variant in your PC to schedule "After Event" and you set the periodic flag, then after the BI_PROCESS_TRIGGER job finishes, it will reschedule itself.  So, there will always be a BI_PROCESS_TRIGGER job in a Released status.
    Again, the BI_PROCESS_TRIGGER job does not run the entire chain.  It only triggers the next processes in your chain.
    Does this help?
    PS.  Are there any BI_PROCESS_TRIGGER jobs in a Complete status?  If not, then there is an issue with your ABAP program.
    Edited by: Geo on May 4, 2009 11:13 AM

Maybe you are looking for