Bootcamp NON intel CPU's-use all programs

Does Bootcamp Support NON intel CPU's like my G4 IMAC? and Can it use ALL of the windows programs?

http://www.apple.com/support/bootcamp/
Only Intel when talking Macs, no PowerMacs or G4 etc.

Similar Messages

Allowing non-admin users to use certain programs without authenticating

I would like to allow certain programs to be run by non-admin users without forcing them to authenticate as an admin. Here is my example: I'm running Parallels Desktop with a VM to Windows. I want to allow my children to use this VM to access Windows programs. But, when starting a VM, the Mac OS requires an administrator to authenticate. Needless to say, I don't want my children to be administrators on the machine. I've been assured that this is not an issue related to how Parallels works (from the support team at Parallels). Instead, this is an issue with the Mac. i'm not sure one way or the other, but it seams useful to be able to (in general) allow non-admin users to use certain programs without forcing them to authenicate as administrators.
There is only one summary in the Mac help on allowing non-admin users to change the time zone settings by directly editing the /etc/authorization file. Does anybody know if this procedure would work for other programs?
Thanks!

If you know what the requested right is, that procedure can be applied to any right in an application with a graphic interface by duplicating and modifying entries. The contents of that file don't control usage of sudo in the Terminal.
(25922)

Performance problems on non-Intel CPU's

Hello,
Recently I have been looking into tracking down a performance problem with Adobe Flash on a couple of different Linux platforms. I understand that there is limited hardware acceleration and that is actually important for my question. On multiple netbooks I tested similar Flash based content and found that content my EeePC 701 with a 600Mhz Intel Celeron could play, a netbook with a VIA processor running at 1Ghz couldn't even come close to playing. Running sysprof I see that 80+% of the time is spent within the libflashplayer library.
To my point, which you may or may not want to answer. Is it possible that Adobe uses Intel's compiler to produce their binaries? I only ask this because it has been documented that Intel's compiler explicitely disables certain optimizations for non-GenuineIntel processors, http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1567108/intel-compiler-cripples-code-amd-via-chip s
. I have also examined the codepaths and see that libflashplayer.so does check /proc/cpuinfo for the vendor_id string in it's initialization logic.
I don't want to start conspiracy theories, but if any of this is valid at all, could it please be fixed? Thanks.

http://www.apple.com/support/bootcamp/
Only Intel when talking Macs, no PowerMacs or G4 etc.

Single database connection create and using all programs jsp and servlet

Hai
i am create databaset connection using that all programs how to implement

Post the steps you managed already. If you don't know anything about how to receive data from a database try this link:
http://java.sun.com/docs/books/tutorial/jdbc/index.html

How can different user on one PC use all programs

I have two user on one PC and it should be possible that all user can use all programms.
Is it possible?
What do I have to do?

Mac OS X is inherently a Multi-User system, even if you were to create only one User account on it.
Mac OS X maintains completely separate System Files, protected from most arbitrary access, and Applications and Utilities are stored there to be used by all users.
Changeable information, including Preferences that seem to be system-wide, are actually stored in User directories under:
/Users/your username/
To have multiple Users run the same programs with different settings, you must do the following:
• Nothing.
Your Mac is already set up to do exactly that.
EDIT: Allan Eckert types faster than I do, and brings up an important point.
The Applications included with Mac OS X and installed automatically are placed in:
/Applications and
/Applications/Utilities
and are available to all Users.
If you Install an Application in a User directory, it will only be available to that user.
So don't do that!
Install Applications in the standard places, which WILL require that you provide an Administrator Username and Password.

Which Intel CPU is used for MacBook Pro 13" 2.26 GHz

Hello,
I want to buy the above-mentioned MacBook Pro, however, I don't know which CPU model is used (P7550 or P8400), since I need the CPU feature "IVT" (Intel® Virtualization Technology) which is only available in P8400.
In some German discussions I got the information that both CPU models have been sold in Germany (checked with the tool CPU-X)
The MacBook Pro with 2.53 GHz (P8700) has also the IVT feature.
Does anybody know which CPU model is currently used in the MacBook 13" (MMB990*/A)?
Thanks for your feedback.
Michael

Hello Rod,
Today I was in the apple store in munich and checked some mbp 13" 2,26 GHz systems. All had the 8400 inside. I shortly spoke with a saleman, however, he didn't know about different models inside the systems and told me, that I can't test the system locally, but I can check it @home and if i'm not happy with the system I could bring it back within 14 days.
My result from the mbp:
machdep.cpu.brand_string: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU P8400 @ 2.26GHz
machdep.cpu.features: FPU VME DE PSE TSC MSR PAE MCE CX8 APIC SEP MTRR PGE MCA CMOV PAT PSE36 CLFSH DS ACPI MMX FXSR SSE SSE2 SS HTT TM SSE3 MON DSCPL VMX SMX EST TM2 SSSE3 CX16 TPR PDCM SSE4.1
I compared it with your results and the only difference I found was an additional feature "SMX" (Safer Mode Extensions). I couldn't find out for what exactly this is used, but I seems independ of the IVT.
I believe that you are right, and the VMX corresponds to the "IVT" feature. If this is true, I could take any MBP 13"
What do you mean?
Thx
Michael

Unusually High CPU usage by almost all programs

I have a BIG problem with my computer. It start over a week ago and ever since, I've been trying to fix it. The problem is that almost all programs I use takes up 100% of my CPU usage. The only thing that doesn't are window's program but they also take up a lot of CPU usage. It is not the usual 1-3 sec of high CPU usage that all programs use. It is high CPU usage for a long period of time. A Youtube video causes my CPU to go to 100% just by playing it. Also, scans, surfing the web and other things cause it to go up. My computer runs really slow because of this. It is about 2-3 times slower. This is strange because my computer would rarely ever go over 60% for longer than 5 seconds. The memory amount taken up from my programs are not unusual. Its just that CPU part is way to high. I am un-able to play a game and open a web browser without massive lag on both programs. I have done everything I can. I did a restore for a day before this happened and it didn't work. I scanned for viruses with McAfee Microsoft essentials and Ad-ware antivirus and removed all threats. I have clean my computer with CCleaner and Advanced system care. I have scanned for spyware with spybot S&D, Superantispyware. I have checked for malware with Malewarebytes. But the problem is not solved. I really need the help. If you want me to download something to scan my computer I'm up for it because currently, I'm desperate.
Another thing. I have an Intel Core 2 Quad CPU. But, in msconfig, I cannot select 4 processors in advance options in the boot section. I only shows 1 for some reason. I could really use the help.
These are my specs
HP Pavilion a6554f Desktop PC
Intel Core 2 Quad CPU 2.40Ghz
5.00 GB of RAM
Motherboard is PEGATRON CORPORATION Benicia 1.01
BIOS: American Megatrends Inc. 5.22 03/28/2008
I have windows vista 64-bit Home Premium

Hi,
In the Advanced Boot Option of the System Configuration window, if there is a tick in the box next to 'Number of Processors', click the box to remove it, click OK, click Apply and then OK in the previous window and then restart the PC for the change to take effect.
Regards,
DP-K
****Click the White thumb to say thanks****
****Please mark Accept As Solution if it solves your problem****
****I don't work for HP****
Microsoft MVP - Windows Experience

Using MacBook backup with non-Intel Mac laptop

I'm scheduled for a computer replacement at work (not a new one, but a hand-me-down from someone else). I was originally told it would have to be a Windows PC (grrr), but then it turned out that someone who recently left for another job had a Mac laptop that I can have instead. I'm not sure exactly what model it is, but it's my understanding that it's only a year or two old. I assume it will be an iBook or a PowerBook.
I'm wondering if I can use my MacBook backup (which is on an external harddrive and is bootable) to boot up a non-Intel Mac laptop. Since I have to send my MacBook back in for repair (second round of RSD), I was hoping that once I get this older laptop I could just boot from my external and keep on working as if I still had my MacBook (without the ability to use Windows of course). I assume all the programs (except Parallels) would be compatible, but would the system files work?

I don't think it will allowed you to boot from that external that installed with os X 10.4.x (compiled for macintel version).
But surely you can use the data in it if you have proper or similar program at the older portable mac.
But if you willing to try it, it won't hurt, just connect that external and restart while pressing the option key, and if it shows as an option for start up, click on it and see how it goes. If nothing happen, simply shutdown the laptop and restart regularly using its own hd.
Good Luck.

HELP: Premiere Pro CC not using all CPU and RAM during rendering and export

Hello,
I am using Premiere Pro CC on a Windows 7. My timeline is quite simple with two videos, one with the movie (mpeg) and the other with the subtitles (avi).
When I render the sequence in PP or export, the rendering time is way too slow and it only uses around 15-20% of the CPU and 3 GB of RAM.
My hardware config is :
- CPU : i7-4770k 3.50Ghz
- RAM : 8 GB
- Disk : 2 x 3 TB SATA (no raid)
RAM is not the bottleneck, neither the disk access.
I have tried rendering and exporting the same project on an iMac (with an i5 2.7 Ghz and 4 GB RAM and only 1 disk) and the result is 4x faster !!!
The CPU usage is close to 100% as well as RAM usage.
So how come PP uses all resources availble on an iMac and not on a Windows 7 ?
Is there any known bug or software bottleneck on Windows 7 ?
My machine is brand new and nothing much installed besides Adobe products.
Any help is very much appreciated.
Thanks,

I just rendered out a a 2 minute sequence with about 100 clips in it and Colorista effects on everything to the Vimeo 1080 H264 preset. It took about 5 minutes to render straight from Premiere, it used all the recourses it could, my CPU was running at near %100, same with my ram and GPU, I was happy.
Then I did another render with Red Giant Denoiser and it now wants to take 30 mins and it is only using about %20 of the recourses available. My problem isn't that its taking longer with Denoiser but that its not using all of my computers CPU and GPU.
Im rendering at maximum render quality and bit dept to H264 (Im happy to wait the extra time), if I try to use VRB 2 it encodes 1 pass at a time and wants to take up to 40 minutes.
I would appreciate some advice on this.
Premiere Pro CC 2013
2.6 GHz Intel Core i7
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M 2048 MB (CUDA GPU enabled in Premiere)
16 GB 1600 MHz DDR3
OS X 10.9.4 (13E28)

Syslogd process uses all available cpu & console app won't run.

I have a Mac Mini (G4 power PC) running 10.5.5. Just recently after several minutes the system never wakes. It just shows the SBBOD. All I can do is hold down the power button and reboot. When the system reboots, using the activity monitor, I see that the process named syslogd uses all available cpu. I can still do things, but the cpu is saturated.
I took a snapshot of the syslogd process, and I can post it here if anyone thinks it might help.
If I activate the console application, the window comes up then hangs with the SBBOD.
The syslogd process uses all available cpu right after reboot, and does so regardless of which user (including root) is logged in. Attempting to kill the syslogd process with the activity monitor does nothing

Thanks! It took a long time for the disk utility to fix the permissions, but as soon as it did, the logger process calmed down. Looking at the log file now, I see it was my McAfee virus scan causing the logger to flip-out.
I'm now looking for a new MAC anti-virus program.

Apple mobile device use all cpu

After I have updated to Itunes 10.5 apple MobileDevice use all my cpu,I tried to uninstall all apple programs and reinstall them but the problem appears again.
To uninstall and reinstall fixed the the same problem with itunes 10.4.
I hope someone is able to help me.

The CPU has been resolved after reading other posts:
From the command prompt, enter: netsh winsock reset
Then reboot computer.
My Sony Vaio runs faster, all Apple Mobile Device issues are gone, and iTune starts up instantly and syncs my iPad and iPod,
Funny thing is the guys at the Apple Store Genius Bar couldn't come up with this. In any case, hope this helps another reader.....

AE CS5 not using all memory and cpu

I am using After Effects CS5, wondering why the rendering is not using my CPU and memory full. It`s using only 15 % of memory and sometimes up to 50 % of CPU. What can I do to make it use better my hardware.
The current rendering is chroma key using Keylight.
I understand it can`t use all the hardware, but why only 15 %, because everybody is talking that you need a lot of RAM for AE.
CPU: Intel Core i7 920 - overclocked to 3.4 GHz
MEMORY: 6 GB DDR3
GRAPHIC: nVidia GTX 285

Not all rendering operations will max out all RAM and all CPUs (processor cores). Some rendering operations are I/O intensive; some are memory-intensive; some are CPU-intensive. If, for example, I/O is the bottleneck, then you won't see either CPU or RAM usage maxed.
Also, the goal isn't to see that 100% of the CPU and 100% of of RAM is being used. The goal is faster rendering (and other operations). Sometimes greatest performance is achieved when there's "headroom" left over for other activity. See this page.
Are you using Render Multiple Frames Simultaneously multiprocessing? That is one feature that really benefits from having a lot of RAM. The 6GB of RAM that you have in your system is not enough to make effective use of that feature. See this page.
Here's a page that collects information about how to optimize for performance.

Using all types of resultset Objects i need a single program

i think all of u know that there are 8 types of resultset objects are there in jdbc technology i.e
# next() - moves the cursor forward one row. Returns true if the cursor is now positioned on a row and false if the cursor is positioned after the last row.
# previous() - moves the cursor backwards one row. Returns true if the cursor is now positioned on a row and false if the cursor is positioned before the first row.
# first() - moves the cursor to the first row in the ResultSet object. Returns true if the cursor is now positioned on the first row and false if the ResultSet object
does not contain any rows.
# last() - moves the cursor to the last row in the ResultSet object. Returns true if the cursor is now positioned on the last row and false if the ResultSet object
does not contain any rows.
# beforeFirst() - positions the cursor at the start of the ResultSet object, before the first row. If the ResultSet object does not contain any rows, this method has
no effect.
# afterLast() - positions the cursor at the end of the ResultSet object, after the last row. If the ResultSet object does not contain any rows, this method has no effect.
# relative(int rows) - moves the cursor relative to its current position.
# absolute(int n) - positions the cursor on the n-th row of the ResultSet object.
Using all these result set methods i need a sample program all these methods must be used in a single program itself

BalajiEnntech123 wrote:
i think all of u know that there are 8 types of resultset objects are there in jdbc technology i.e I don't know who "u" are but they're wrong if they think there are "8 types of resultset objects are there in jdbc technology".
They'd be especially wrong to think that the methods you mention are "types of resultset objects".

Can I use a Power PC non intel Mac Mini as an external HD with my iMac 3.06

Can I use a Power PC non intel Mac Mini as an external HD with my iMac 3.06 Intel Core Duo
I can't figure out how to get this to work. Is it possible?

WildBull wrote:
Will it work if I connect via usb instead of firewire?
No. There is no "USB Target Disk Mode".
Just so we're clear, when you start your Mac mini in FireWire Target Disk Mode (TDM - holding T on startup), do you see a FireWire icon on the Mac mini's display? IIRC, it's not required that the Mac mini be connected to a display for TDM, but it would help diagnose whether or not the mini is actually starting in this mode.

Why can't I make Lightroom use all the CPU-Power (all cores) available for generating Previews?

Dear Lightroom Team,
I've been a Lightroom user since the very first Beta, and I am truly happy with the work you deliver. It changed my way of editing forever, and you guys keep improving it.
Yet there is that one question that bothers me, and that i'm looking for an answer for.
My Workflow has the generate Previews checkbox checked by standard. I usually import between 150 and 2000 photos at once, on occaions it can be up to 5000 photos. Generating Previews always takes a significant amount of time, and Lightroom is only using 25% of my CPU Power while doing so. (using a MacBook Pro 8,2)
I understand the concept, that only using 25% CPU enables me to use the computer while waiting for the Previews. But most of the time I just grab myself a cup of coffee, do the dishes or other stuff, while waiting for the Previews. Usually I rund out of things to do, because it takes ages to Process all the photos. So I would really love to make Lightroom use ALL the cpu power possible.
I'm sure you guys have spent a lot of thoughts while coding this and have a very good answer handy. Looking forward reading it!
all the best,
Wolfgang

Wolfgang Lienbacher wrote:
I was actually hoping to get an official reply from adobe ...
This is prmarily a user-to-user forum. The Adobe staff monitored site is here:
http://feedback.photoshop.com/photoshop_family
On my four-year old Windows 7 i7-860 system LR4.4.1 takes ~0.5 sec. per Canon 5D MKII 21Mp raw image to render 'Standard-Sized' previews with LR Catalog Settings 'Standard Preview Size' set to '2048' pixels. I consider that pretty fast!
I usually build 1:1 full-size previews on import, which takes ~5.0 sec. per image. Processor utilization varies between 15-50% for Standard-Sized previews and 15-65% for 1:1 previews. I consider this pretty slow, but it doesn't stop me from working on the images inside LR's Library and Develop modules.
I wait until 'Copy and import photos' has completed and can see Preview Building has started. LR doesn't slow-down much even with the 1:1 preview building going on in the background. Have you tried working in LR during the preview building (i.e. sorting, rating, keywording, and Develop adjustments)?

Bootcamp NON intel CPU's-use all programs

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for