Bordermanager/firewall & gwia on same server

I had gwia 6 running on Nw 6.0 before i installed bordermanager 3.7 on
the same server, now gwia cannot send or receive mails. i have tried re-
installing the gwia, but it still didnt work. I found a TID -
Troubleshooting gwia issues; which directed me to another TID specific to
the problem - TID 2935776, but that cannot be found at all.
What do i do next?
Thx.
Buki

For the receive, Have you created 2 filters, one inbound from pub to pub, port
25 with a destination of the public IP number of the GWIA? The second is the
opposite, source pup, port 25 with the ack bit set?
Public
Public
TCP
any
25
any
10.10.10.10
Public
Public
TCP
25
ack
10.10.10.10
any
I also tend to bind a secondary IPaddress just for the gwia as opposed to the
primary number in this situation.
For the outbound,
Public
Public
TCP
1024-65535
25
10.10.10.10
any
public
public
25
1024-65535
ack
any
10.10.10.10
Hope this helps
Tim
On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 08:32:05 GMT, [email protected] wrote:
>I had gwia 6 running on Nw 6.0 before i installed bordermanager 3.7 on
>the same server, now gwia cannot send or receive mails. i have tried re-
>installing the gwia, but it still didnt work. I found a TID -
>Troubleshooting gwia issues; which directed me to another TID specific to
>the problem - TID 2935776, but that cannot be found at all.
>What do i do next?
>Thx.
>
>Buki
No Direct e-Mail Please!
Tim Heywood
Independent Consultant
Scotland
(God's Country)
Novell Support Connection SYSOP
In theory, practice and theory are the same,
In practice they are different!

Similar Messages

How do I install two instances on the same Server and avoid a conflict?

Hi,
I have one Server and I want to install two instances of SQL Server on it.
1. Will be a default instance.
2. Will be a named instance.
The Server has an IP address of 192.168.0.10 and the default instance will be using port 1433.
I want them to share the same address, but be listening on different ports.
Do I,
1. Go into TCP/IP of the named instance and set the port numbers for all the IP's to a port number, e.g. 1976?
2. Delete the 0 from the dynamic ports sections?
3. Create an open port rule in the Windows Firewall to allow access to the Server?
Thanks

Hi,
Please see following Microsoft link
Configure SQL Server to listen on Specific port
Configure Windows firewall to allow SQL Server access
Please mark this reply as answer if it solved your issue or vote as helpful if it helped so that other forum members can benefit from it.
My TechNet Wiki Articles

Two POAs on same server?

I need to segment some users away from our main POA. Can I run two post
office agents on the same server?
SLES11/OES11, GroupWise 2012
One server is currently running 1 each of MTA, POA, GWIA and WEBACC. We
have about 130 email accounts total. We want to add about 50 users to a
separate POA to differentiate them in the System.
Thank you,
Angie

Angie Veach wrote:
> I need to segment some users away from our main POA. Can I run two
> post office agents on the same server?
Yes. You either run them each on a separate port both on the same
existing IP address of the server, or you bind a second IP address to
the server and in the properties of the POA specify the correct IP
address for each POA. You then can leave them both at the default port
of 1677 (7191 for SOAP).
We're your Novell--again. http://www.novell.com/promo/backtobasics.html
Enhancement Requests: http://www.novell.com/rms

Setting up bordermanager vpn in the same tree

Hi,
I want to install a bordermanager 3.9 slave vpn server in the same tree to
place it later to a remote office, so I did what was in Craig's book:
Configured an private ipaddress on the server, that contained the master
replica's and the server that contained the CA. (same subnet as the new
bordermanager)
I installed the new server succesfully in a separate ou. Also installed
bordermanager 3.9 on it. Made this ou a partition.
I assume I need to add a replica of this new OU (partition) to the new
server, and that it must be the master (for licensing issues)? and that I
also need to add r/w replica's to the new server of the partition for
SLPscopes and the root partition? My question is if I add the replica's, do
all my servers then have a communication problem, because they try to
contact this new server, but they can't? (only the master and ca server can
at this moment, because they are in the same subnet). Or is this not the
case?
Is this all and can then the server safely be shipped or are there some
important things to check before I ship the server?
master replica : nw65sp7, edir873
ca : nw65sp5, edir873
mastervpnserver : nw65sp7, bm385
new server : nw65sp7, edir882, bm391
Thanks,
Michael

You don't HAVE to have replicas on the BM servers other than one which
holds the server itself. That said, it can certainly help to have
other servers.
If your slave server cannot communicate with the other servers in the
tree, then your routing setup is incomplete. If you tried to add
another replica to the slave, my guess is that the add would not
complete, unless the master of the replica ring was the master VPN
server (and even then I'm not sure the replica would turn on).
But if you have the VPN up, and basic communications working, you
should be able to put the slave in the remote location and have
everything work. I'd look closely at why routing packets is not
working. It *should* work, unless you already have routing to that
remote subnet address set up.
Perhaps I'm not understanding what you've done there, and I'm thinking
this is more complex than it is. If you have a new subnet on the new
BM server, and an address from that subnet added as a second binding on
the BM master (old) server, then every server in the tree should be
able to communicate with the new server, as long as packets make it to
the old server. This may require some static routes on remote subnets
(be careful).
It is possible to completely emulate the remote site such that the BMgr
server is able to talk to the new server via a VPN connection. This
configuration gets a bit complicated to configure on the master BMgr
side, and usually has a limitation that other slave servers cannot talk
to the new slave in a fully-meshed VPN. But they will once the new
server is put in place at the remote location with the (non-emulated)
public IP address connected to the Internet.
Craig Johnson
Novell Support Connection SysOp
*** For a current patch list, tips, handy files and books on
BorderManager, go to http://www.craigjconsulting.com ***

OTD AdminNode conflicts with Coherence nodes running on same server???

I set up a traditional OTD failover group exposing private proxy to storage nodes. Strangely when I run OTD admin nodes they seem to create conflict with Coherence nodes running on same server. Any clues on what could cause the problem (same default ports?). The msgs I get are the followings:
WARN 2014-08-27 13:09:12,585 [com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.logOutput.Log4j] - 2014-08-27 13:09:12.585/299.393 Oracle Coherence GE 12.1.2.0.2 <Warning> (thread=Cluster, member=n/a): Delaying formation of a new cluster; IpMonitor failed to verify the reachability of senior Member(Id=2, Timestamp=2014-08-27 12:15:34.775, Address=192.168.10.98:50124, MachineId=41903, xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Role=jmx-connector); if this persists it is likely the result of a local or remote firewall rule blocking either ICMP pings, or connections to TCP port 7
WARN 2014-08-27 13:09:17,598 [com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.logOutput.Log4j] - 2014-08-27 13:09:17.597/304.405 Oracle Coherence GE 12.1.2.0.2 <Warning> (thread=Cluster, member=n/a): Delaying formation of a new cluster; IpMonitor failed to verify the reachability of senior Member(Id=2, Timestamp=2014-08-27 12:15:34.775, Address=192.168.10.98:50124, MachineId=41903, xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Role=jmx-connector); if this persists it is likely the result of a local or remote firewall rule blocking either ICMP pings, or connections to TCP port 7
ERROR 2014-08-27 13:09:21,725 [com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.logOutput.Log4j] - 2014-08-27 13:09:21.724/308.532 Oracle Coherence GE 12.1.2.0.2 <Error> (thread=main, member=n/a): Error while starting cluster: com.tangosol.net.RequestTimeoutException: Timeout during service start: ServiceInfo(Id=0, Name=Cluster, Type=Cluster

I set up a traditional OTD failover group exposing private proxy to storage nodes. Strangely when I run OTD admin nodes they seem to create conflict with Coherence nodes running on same server. Any clues on what could cause the problem (same default ports?). The msgs I get are the followings:
WARN 2014-08-27 13:09:12,585 [com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.logOutput.Log4j] - 2014-08-27 13:09:12.585/299.393 Oracle Coherence GE 12.1.2.0.2 <Warning> (thread=Cluster, member=n/a): Delaying formation of a new cluster; IpMonitor failed to verify the reachability of senior Member(Id=2, Timestamp=2014-08-27 12:15:34.775, Address=192.168.10.98:50124, MachineId=41903, xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Role=jmx-connector); if this persists it is likely the result of a local or remote firewall rule blocking either ICMP pings, or connections to TCP port 7
WARN 2014-08-27 13:09:17,598 [com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.logOutput.Log4j] - 2014-08-27 13:09:17.597/304.405 Oracle Coherence GE 12.1.2.0.2 <Warning> (thread=Cluster, member=n/a): Delaying formation of a new cluster; IpMonitor failed to verify the reachability of senior Member(Id=2, Timestamp=2014-08-27 12:15:34.775, Address=192.168.10.98:50124, MachineId=41903, xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Role=jmx-connector); if this persists it is likely the result of a local or remote firewall rule blocking either ICMP pings, or connections to TCP port 7
ERROR 2014-08-27 13:09:21,725 [com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.logOutput.Log4j] - 2014-08-27 13:09:21.724/308.532 Oracle Coherence GE 12.1.2.0.2 <Error> (thread=main, member=n/a): Error while starting cluster: com.tangosol.net.RequestTimeoutException: Timeout during service start: ServiceInfo(Id=0, Name=Cluster, Type=Cluster

Forward to different web-app on same server

I can forward a request from a servlet to another web-app on same server, but the authenticated principal is not propagated from original servlet to forwarded servlet. I'm using the requestDispatcher.forward(req,resp) method. It seems that if you forward to a web-app within same EAR or server than the user's identifty should be propagated.

With tomcat you can use single sign on .
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.0-doc/config/host.html#Single%20Sign%20On
regards Dietmar

Error while uninstalling and then re installing sharepoint 2013 on same server(windows server 2012)

Hi All,
I have installed SharePoint 2013 prerequisites successfully on windows server 2012. While installing SharePoint 2013, system struck on for several minutes. I have restart my system manually. Later I then installed prerequisites which showed a successful
lessage. But When I try to install SharePoint 2013. I am getting the following error:
trial editions and lincensed editions of SharePoint, Project Server, and Office Web apps products may not be installed on the same server.
I am unable to find solution for this issue. what is the solution for this?
Thanks in Advance..
Prem Kumar

To be honest, the quickest thing you could do (and what I would do regardless) is re-build the server (re-install Windows).
Trevor Seward
Follow or contact me at...
&nbsp&nbsp
This post is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect the opinion or view of Microsoft, its employees, or other MVPs.

Move file from App server to same server on different path

Hi All,
I have to move a file from Application server to a folder in the same server....
pls tell me how can i do this....
its very urgent....
Thanks...............

Hi
First you read the file in output mode using Open dataset and Read dataset statement with the initial application server path.
Then write this data back to another file path by opening the file in Input mode and using Transfer statement.
Example.
open dataset <file1> mode output encding default.
if sy-subrc = 0.
do.
read dataset <file1> into wa_itab.
if sy-subrc = 0.
append wa_itab to itab.
else.
exit.
endif.
enddo.
open dataset <file2> mode input encding default.
if sy-subrc = 0.
loop at itab into wa_itab.
transfer wa_itab to <file2>.
endloop.
endif.
~ Ranganath
PS : Reward points for all useful answers !

How can I migrate file shares & permissions from one volume to another on the same server?

I am replacing a storage array and as part of that process, I need to move files/folders and Shares/permissions from one Volume to another volume within the same server.
The server is Windows 2003 file server. The file transfers are not a problem, moving all 40 shares with permissions etc. is my main concern because in order to maintain everything I need to change the drive letter of the new volume to match the old
one so that links to various resources throughout the network do not break.

Hi,
If you want to copy files/folders from one Volume to another volume within the same server, you could use the File Server Migration Tool (FSMT) or Robocopy to accomplish your goals. The tool can move all of the files from the shares on your original volume
to the new volume.
For more detailed information, you could refer to the articles below:
File Server Migration Toolkit
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/2006.10.utilityspotlight.aspx
The File Server Migration Toolkit (FSMT) is a free download available at:
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?DisplayLang=en&id=10268
Robocopy
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc733145.aspx
FSMT and Robocopy will not copy Share permissions but only NTFS permissions. So if the drive letter will not be changed, you can backup and restore the Share permission with steps here:
Saving and restoring existing Windows shares
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/125996
Regards,
Mandy
We
are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

Access to different application in same server

Any know an easy way to access the JNDI/EJB of a different application
running in the same server?
Perry Hoekstra, MS
E-Commerce Architect
Talent Software Services

Only the classfiles of any user-defined classes/interfaces that are possibly used
as parameters or return values from the methods in the home/remote interfaces. If
you aren't doing that, then the home and remote interfaces is all you need.
Bill
Perry Hoekstra wrote:
[email protected] wrote:
Hrm. It's no different from accessing EJB's deployed in the same application
(EAR) except that local calls are no longer possible.
Perry Hoekstra <[email protected]> wrote:
Any know an easy way to access the JNDI/EJB of a different application
running in the same server?
Perry Hoekstra, MS
E-Commerce Architect
Talent Software Services--
DimitriI should have explained myself better. I was thinking more from a
packaging point of view. Beside the remote and home interfaces of the
called bean, are there any other files necessary to be packaged with the
calling bean ejb.jar?
Perry Hoekstra, MS
E-Commerce Architect
Talent Software Services
[email protected]

Different logon pages for same server.

hi Expert,
I have created two different logon pages with different URL's for the same server, now i can use both the pages to logon in to the system.
what i need to do now is :-
URL "A" users set ="A"
URL "B" users set ="B"
If we have the above two different URL and respective users for those URLs.
Now if i am User from the User set "A" and try to Login by using URL "B".
I am able to login, but i want to restrict.
ie.
users from set ="A" login only by the link URL "A"
users from set ="B" login only by the link URL "B"
Points would be given to helpful answers.
Regards,
Sanjyoti.

Hi Sanjyoti,
I am not sure if this would work, but if time permits then do try this.
User A -- URL A
User B -- URL B
Now make User A a part of Group A, and set conditions in code that Group A can logon only through URL A and User B can logon through URL B.
Then in code check the association user - group and group - url and accordingly allow / disallow the user to go ahead.
This is just a thought.....do tell me if this works.....or if it doesnt then do post the solution you use....
Thanks,
GLM
P.S: PLEASE CLOSE THE THREAD IF THE ISSUE HAS BEEN RESOLVED
Edited by: GLM on Aug 27, 2008 2:08 PM

Activating MS Office 2013 ProPlus via KMS running on the same server

Given: Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise 64-bit, all the latest security updates applied.
KMS service set up and running, all the recommended updates applied (to handle possible activation issues for Windows 8 etc)
Microsoft Office 2013 Standard deployed on the server mentioned above and on workstations on intranet, volume licensing in effect (proper KMS key for activation of Microsoft Ofice 2013 has been entered).
Problem: I can't activate MS Office 2013 installation running on the same server where KMS service is being run.
There are no entries in KMS event log related to this failure.
Everything was restarted, reinstalled etc several times already (including installing 32-bit and 64-bit versions of the Office).
Output of slmgr.vbs /dlv 2E28138A-847F-42BC-9752-61B03FFF33CD:
Windows Script Host
Software licensing service version: 6.1.7601.17946
Name: Office 15, KMSHostVL edition
Description: Office 15, VOLUME_KMS channel
Activation ID: 2e28138a-847f-42bc-9752-61b03fff33cd
Application ID: 0ff1ce15-a989-xxxx-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx
Extended PID: 55041-00206-234-486666-03-xxxx-xxxx.xxxx-xxxxxxx
Installation ID: 01683679734050124078134659xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Processor Certificate URL: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkID=88342
Machine Certificate URL: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkID=88343
Use License URL: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkID=88345
Product Key Certificate URL: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkID=88344
Partial Product Key: xxxxx
License Status: Licensed
Remaining Windows rearm count: 4
Trusted time: 2/05/2015 10:00:12 AM
Key Management Service is enabled on this machine
Current count: 0
Listening on Port: 1688
DNS publishing enabled
KMS priority: Normal
Key Management Service cumulative requests received from clients
Total requests received: 0
Failed requests received: 0
Requests with License Status Unlicensed: 0
Requests with License Status Licensed: 0
Requests with License Status Initial grace period: 0
Requests with License Status License expired or Hardware out of tolerance: 0
Requests with License Status Non-genuine grace period: 0
Requests with License Status Notification: 0
OK
Output of cscript ospp.vbs /dstatus
Microsoft (R) Windows Script Host Version 5.8
Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
---Processing--------------------------
SKU ID: b13afb38-cd79-4ae5-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx
LICENSE NAME: Office 15, OfficeStandardVL_KMS_Client edition
LICENSE DESCRIPTION: Office 15, VOLUME_KMSCLIENT channel
LICENSE STATUS: ---OOB_GRACE---
ERROR CODE: 0x4004f00c
ERROR DESCRIPTION: Run the following: cscript ospp.vbs /ddescr:0x4004f00c
Last 5 characters of installed product key: GVGXT
DNS auto-discovery: KMS name not available
Activation Interval: 120 minutes
Renewal Interval: 10080 minutes
KMS host caching: Enabled
---Exiting-----------------------------

Given: Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise 64-bit, all the latest security updates applied.
KMS service set up and running, all the recommended updates applied (to handle possible activation issues for Windows 8 etc)
Microsoft Office 2013 Standard deployed on the server mentioned above and on workstations on intranet, volume licensing in effect (proper KMS key for activation of Microsoft Ofice 2013 has been entered).
Problem: I can't activate MS Office 2013 installation running on the same server where KMS service is being run.
There are no entries in KMS event log related to this failure.
Everything was restarted, reinstalled etc several times already (including installing 32-bit and 64-bit versions of the Office).
Output of slmgr.vbs /dlv 2E28138A-847F-42BC-9752-61B03FFF33CD:
Windows Script Host
Software licensing service version: 6.1.7601.17946
Name: Office 15, KMSHostVL edition
Description: Office 15, VOLUME_KMS channel
Activation ID: 2e28138a-847f-42bc-9752-61b03fff33cd
Application ID: 0ff1ce15-a989-xxxx-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx
Extended PID: 55041-00206-234-486666-03-xxxx-xxxx.xxxx-xxxxxxx
Installation ID: 01683679734050124078134659xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Processor Certificate URL: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkID=88342
Machine Certificate URL: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkID=88343
Use License URL: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkID=88345
Product Key Certificate URL: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkID=88344
Partial Product Key: xxxxx
License Status: Licensed
Remaining Windows rearm count: 4
Trusted time: 2/05/2015 10:00:12 AM
Key Management Service is enabled on this machine
Current count: 0
Listening on Port: 1688
DNS publishing enabled
KMS priority: Normal
Key Management Service cumulative requests received from clients
Total requests received: 0
Failed requests received: 0
Requests with License Status Unlicensed: 0
Requests with License Status Licensed: 0
Requests with License Status Initial grace period: 0
Requests with License Status License expired or Hardware out of tolerance: 0
Requests with License Status Non-genuine grace period: 0
Requests with License Status Notification: 0
OK
Output of cscript ospp.vbs /dstatus
Microsoft (R) Windows Script Host Version 5.8
Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
---Processing--------------------------
SKU ID: b13afb38-cd79-4ae5-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx
LICENSE NAME: Office 15, OfficeStandardVL_KMS_Client edition
LICENSE DESCRIPTION: Office 15, VOLUME_KMSCLIENT channel
LICENSE STATUS: ---OOB_GRACE---
ERROR CODE: 0x4004f00c
ERROR DESCRIPTION: Run the following: cscript ospp.vbs /ddescr:0x4004f00c
Last 5 characters of installed product key: GVGXT
DNS auto-discovery: KMS name not available
Activation Interval: 120 minutes
Renewal Interval: 10080 minutes
KMS host caching: Enabled
---Exiting-----------------------------

XI and R/3 Running on the same Server.

Hello Friends!
One year ago I've installed XI on a machine that already had a R/3 instance. Although there were different instances, one for SAP R/3 and one instance for the ABAP part of XI, I couldn't get to connect XI to the R/3, appartently XI searched for the instance through the IP address, ignoring the instance ID parameter.
Now I have again the same challenge, I have only one machine to run R/3 and XI.
Does anyone know if it is possible to do?

Hi Tadeo,
from ERP 2004 you can install XI on the same server.
Regards,
Udo

How can i deploy two different versions of the same application on the same server??

I have two different versions of an application. One is a released version. And another version under development. I need to port this version of the application to the same server. I'm using the same classes and packages(except for some new ones). Is it sufficient if i change the name of my ear(application name). Or should i change my code also.

Hi
You can repackage the new versions of ear,jar and war with different names. I hope that should work well.
Cheers
-pradeep

Can different cluster of SAP Business One installed on the same Server

Hi!
Can anyone tell me if B1 different cluster version installed and run on the same server. Example B1 2005A AND B1 2005B. If it can, could you please include the procedure how can it be done.
Thanks,
Jo Borlagdan

No, A and B have different patch cycles - so there would be conflicts in SBO-Common. Therefore it will not work.
You could try to workaround that with named instances of MSSQL, but installation & update would need additional care + workarounds.
The best way to combine 2 SAP Business One cluster "servers" but still on one hardware would be to use a tool like VMWare... - but such a configuration has not been released by SAP - i.e. if there's an issue that could be traced back to the VMWare system, SAP might not be (li?)able to fix it
Sorry,
Frank
Message was edited by: Frank Moebius
BTW: Please note that you need to think eventually about conflicts with MS licenses. SAP has an agreement with MS which ASFAIK covers the license for 1 VMWare Windows system on 1 Windows PC so that we can use WMWare for SAP Business One sandbox systems - after RAM upgrades () it works fine...

Bordermanager/firewall & gwia on same server

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for