BPC 7.5 upgrade issue

Hi Experts ,
We have upgraded 7.0 to 7.5 sp04,but we ar having issue with installaing the client and logging in to BPC for Excel. When we install the BPC for Office client or the admin console
Error Message : "You do not have authority to install the Planning and
Consolidation client"
Then click NEXT and continue instalaltion
It appears everything installs,but when we try to log in to the Admin console or Ofice Client message occurs
"The
system cannot connect to the (http://bpctest.int.XXXX.com) application
server"
Please suggest
Reagrds
Prabhu

Hello
Prabhu
We are trying to install the patch SP07 , upgrading from SP04.
have u done a successfull patch with SP06 ?
One suggestion for ur problem, if u have not done the upgrade Patch by Patch i.e SP03,SP04,SP05,SP06,SP07 i mean if not done cumulatively this could occur
and donot ignore any prior warning or error messages that appear to continue. SAP has already asked to share the errors if any during the upgradation procedures
Please let me know how have You solved this or working on
every input is appreciated
thanks
Edited by: bpcbee on Apr 6, 2011 6:49 PM

Similar Messages

Upgrade issues OBIEE 10g to 11g along with OBIA upgrade

Hi,
I have to upgrade OBIEE 10.1.3.4.1 to OBIEE 11.1.1.5 along with OBIA 7.9.6.1 to 7.9.6.5(Informatica 8.6.1 to 9.0.1) at my client location and I have very little knowledge on it. and want to know/have help documents for upgrade.
And if anyone in the forums involved in upgrade please list the errors/issues occured during upgrade and after upgrade.
1. OBIEE 10g to 11g upgrade issues??
2. OBIA OBIA 7.9.6.1 to 7.9.6.5 upgrade issues along with 10g to 11g??
3. Informatica 8.6.1 to 9.0.1 upgrade issues??
4. DAC upgrade issues??
any response for my questions is appreciated.
Thanks
Jay.
Edited by: Jay on Apr 11, 2012 9:11 AM

HI Jay,
We cannot explained thread list here, If you get any errors plz post me,will try to help out.
This is oracle document link - This document has given step by step with screen shots upgration for 10g to 11g ,Please refer the below link.
http://www.oracle.com/webfolder/technetwork/tutorials/obe/fmw/bi/bi11115/upgrade/upgrade_to_11g.htm
http://obieemanu.blogspot.in/2011/05/rpd-upgration-from-10g-to-11g.html
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E21764_01/upgrade.1111/e10125/ua_command_line.htm#ASMAS149
Award points it is useful.
Thanks,
satya

Report generation toolkit upgrade issues

I have created multiple vi's in that utilize the previous report generation toolkits specifically using the Generate Report Get Data to Modify.vi and the Generate Report Set Modified Data.vi. Obviously the report reference has now changed in 8.6's version of the report generation toolkit and these vi's do not exist in the 8.6 library anymore. What vi's do I need to replace these functions with to make this code work. Can anyone tell me what the work around is to solving this problem. This is a picture of the code.
BJD1613
Lead Test Tools Development Engineer
Philips Respironics
Certified LV Architect / Instructor
Attachments:
code.JPG ‏92 KB

Hi BJD1613,
The Report Generation VIs on the LabVIEW Palettes mutate properly. However, you may run into upgrade issues if VIs distributed with LabVIEW, but not available in the Palettes are used in the code. Hence, I would caution against using them for the same reason.
In this case, the specific references do exist in the report generation classes; however, since they are private, they cannot be accessed by VIs outside the respective classes. A temporary workaround for now is mentioned in the following KB 4OOCSJ4M Getting References in Report Generation Toolkit 1.1.3 with LabVIEW 8.6.
This was reported to R&D (CAR# 123064) for further investigation

EHP Upgrade Issue - Java Stack

Hi,
Our Source System at NW 7.0 SP13 and we are upgrading the system to EHP1 SP03.
Upgrade failed at Downtime > DEPLOY_ONLINE_DEPL phase.
Error log:
Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Error]:                       com.sap.sdt.ucp.phases.AbstractPhaseType.doExecute(AbstractPhaseType.java:863) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Exception has occurred during the execution of the phase.
Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Error]:             com.sap.sdt.jspm.unattended.RequestController.addContextInfo(RequestController.java:178) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Deployment of queue sapjup-queue completed with error
JSPM version is 7.01.3.0.15. Current JSPM log directory is /usr/sap/XPD/JC00/j2ee/JSPM/log/log_2009_09_09_16_09_42.
Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Error]: com.sap.sdt.sapjup.tools.sapjupjspm.SAPJupJSPMRapiAdapter.createAndLogRapiException(SAPJupJSPMRapiAdapter.java:698) [Thread[main,5,main]]: The deployment of the queue failed.
Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Error]: com.sap.sdt.sapjup.tools.sapjupjspm.deploy.SAPJupJSPMDeployer.deployList(SAPJupJSPMDeployer.java:68) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Could not execute deployment of stack file /usr/sap/trans/EPS/in/XPD.xml.
Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Error]:      com.sap.sdt.j2ee.phases.PhaseTypeDeploymentManager.execute(PhaseTypeDeploymentManager.java:519) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Error while executing DeploymentManager phase with action deploySlot. Check the log files for the specified action.
Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Info]:                         com.sap.sdt.ucp.phases.AbstractPhaseType.cleanup(AbstractPhaseType.java:906) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Phase UPGRADE/DEPLOYMENT_BASED_UPGRADE/DEPLOY_ONLINE_DEPL has been completed.
Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Info]:                         com.sap.sdt.ucp.phases.AbstractPhaseType.cleanup(AbstractPhaseType.java:907) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Start time: 2009/09/09 22:09:42.
Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Info]:                         com.sap.sdt.ucp.phases.AbstractPhaseType.cleanup(AbstractPhaseType.java:909) [Thread[main,5,main]]: End time: 2009/09/09 22:11:51.
Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Info]:                         com.sap.sdt.ucp.phases.AbstractPhaseType.cleanup(AbstractPhaseType.java:910) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Duration: 0:02:08.248.
Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Info]:                         com.sap.sdt.ucp.phases.AbstractPhaseType.cleanup(AbstractPhaseType.java:911) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Phase status is error.
I went through the following link , proceeded with option 2, But still getting same error.
Portal Upgrade Issue
Please advise the resolution for the issue I have.
Thanks in advance
Regards
Srinivas
Edited by: Srinivas Dasari on Sep 10, 2009 5:48 AM
Edited by: Srinivas Dasari on Sep 10, 2009 5:48 AM

Issue resolved

Upgrade issues list needed

Hi,
We're currently on 4.6b and going to upgrade to ECC6 with unicode I'm trying to compile a list point taken care converting to unicode from ABAP technical point of view. Does anyone have such a list?
Some points i shortlisted are :
1) Use GUI_UPLOAD and GUI_DOWNLOAD rather than WS_UPLOAD and WS_DOWNLOAD.
2) Structures or table headers that contain non-character data need to be identical when moving, comparing, selecting into, updating from, etc.
3) OPEN DATASET filename IN TEXT MODE FOR INPUT ENCODING DEFAULT.
I know there are others. Any help would be appreciated.
aRs

Check the below links
http://www.sapfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=268386&highlight=upgrade+issues
http://www.sapfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=263434&highlight=upgrade+issues
http://www.sapfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=261051&highlight=upgrade+issues
http://www.sapfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=253316&highlight=upgrade+issues

Errors in Forte 3.5 -Upgrade issue

hello ,
We are having a frequent disruption in the communication SO which has an
externalConnection Class. Did anything change in 3.5? We did not have
these errors in 3L!
After these erros, we have a mutex locking problem which leaves our
application hanging.
Any help will be greatly appreciated!
thanks
suma
Here is an Excerpt of the log file
Task 9: extConn4030a808.Write: 194 bytes written to 10
INFORMATION: Network partner closed connection. This usually means the
process at the other end of the wire failed. Please go look there and
find
out why.
Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
Error #: [501, 152]
Detected at: qqcm_HoseFSM::ReceivedClose at 2
Error Time: Thu May 24 09:16:29
Exception occurred (locally) on partition "MerlinWindows_cl41_Part8",
(partitionId = F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105, taskId =
[F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105.7]) in application
"MerlinWindows_cl41", pid 23406 on node laxrc2 in environment laxrc2.
INFORMATION: Error parameters for Set:0 Msg:0:
Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
Detected at: qqcm_HoseFSM::ReceivedClose at 1
Error Time: Thu May 24 09:16:29
Exception occurred (locally) on partition "MerlinWindows_cl41_Part8",
(partitionId = F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105, taskId =
[F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105.7]) in application
24-May-2001 09:16:47: VH.G.G..GUIT/GUI0/PLAXRC172.23.4.401/../..;PGYX;
Task 9: extConn4030a808.Write: 233 bytes written to 10
INFORMATION: Network partner closed connection. This usually means the
process at the other end of the wire failed. Please go look there and
find
out why.
Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
Error #: [501, 152]
Detected at: qqcm_HoseFSM::ReceivedClose at 2
Error Time: Thu May 24 09:16:47
Exception occurred (locally) on partition "MerlinWindows_cl41_Part8",
(partitionId = F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105, taskId =
[F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105.7]) in application
"MerlinWindows_cl41", pid 23406 on node laxrc2 in environment laxrc2.
INFORMATION: Error parameters for Set:0 Msg:0:
Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
Detected at: qqcm_HoseFSM::ReceivedClose at 1
Error Time: Thu May 24 09:16:47
regards,
Suma Venkatesh

-----Original Message-----
From: Venkatesh, Suma
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 2:39 PM
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: Errors in Forte 3.5 -Upgrade issue
hello ,
We are having a frequent disruption in the communication SO which has an
externalConnection Class. Did anything change in 3.5? We did not have
these errors in 3L!
After these erros, we have a mutex locking problem which leaves our
application hanging.
Any help will be greatly appreciated!
thanks
suma
Here is an Excerpt of the log file
Task 9: extConn4030a808.Write: 194 bytes written to 10
INFORMATION: Network partner closed connection. This usually means the
process at the other end of the wire failed. Please go look there and
find
out why.
Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
Error #: [501, 152]
Detected at: qqcm_HoseFSM::ReceivedClose at 2
Error Time: Thu May 24 09:16:29
Exception occurred (locally) on partition "MerlinWindows_cl41_Part8",
(partitionId = F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105, taskId =
[F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105.7]) in application
"MerlinWindows_cl41", pid 23406 on node laxrc2 in environment
laxrc2.
INFORMATION: Error parameters for Set:0 Msg:0:
Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
Detected at: qqcm_HoseFSM::ReceivedClose at 1
Error Time: Thu May 24 09:16:29
Exception occurred (locally) on partition "MerlinWindows_cl41_Part8",
(partitionId = F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105, taskId =
[F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105.7]) in application
24-May-2001 09:16:47: VH.G.G..GUIT/GUI0/PLAXRC172.23.4.401/../..;PGYX;
Task 9: extConn4030a808.Write: 233 bytes written to 10
INFORMATION: Network partner closed connection. This usually means the
process at the other end of the wire failed. Please go look there and
find
out why.
Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
Error #: [501, 152]
Detected at: qqcm_HoseFSM::ReceivedClose at 2
Error Time: Thu May 24 09:16:47
Exception occurred (locally) on partition "MerlinWindows_cl41_Part8",
(partitionId = F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105, taskId =
[F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105.7]) in application
"MerlinWindows_cl41", pid 23406 on node laxrc2 in environment
laxrc2.
INFORMATION: Error parameters for Set:0 Msg:0:
Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
Detected at: qqcm_HoseFSM::ReceivedClose at 1
Error Time: Thu May 24 09:16:47
regards,
Suma Venkatesh

R12 upgrade issue:Not able to login using forms:Please help****urgent

We have recently upgraded our instance from 11.5.9 to 12.0.4 in Windows 2003 server.
We are unable to login to forms after upgrade, however we are able access self service responsibilities without any issues.
We are getting APP-FND-01496 when we access any forms responsibility. We have tried all possible metalink notes with no luck.
Any help to resolve this issue will be appreciated.

Duplicate thread ...
R12 upgrade issue:Not able to login to forms**please help
Re: R12 upgrade issue:Not able to login to forms**please help

ECC 6.0 EHP-4 upgrade Issue in phase MAIN SHDRUN/ALTNTAB FILL were negative

Hi Basis Expert,
while doing ECC 6.0 EHP-4 Upgrade in MAIN_SHDRUN/ALTNTAB_FILL phase we are getting the following issue please help us.
Checks after phase MAIN_SHDRUN/ALTNTAB_FILL were negative!
Last error code set: BATCH JOB RDDNT2MT FAILED: Error(s) found in the log(s), accumulated in "ALTNTFI.ELG".
We check the shadow instance is up and we can log in to the system. Check ST22 and SM21 notice no error.
Check the JOB RDDNT2MT (SM37) successfully running and all the job finish without any error.
Hope anybody can share a bit your experience on this issue. we try search the note and find the forum but no luck.
Thanks

Hi,
> 2EETG011 "No shadow system""(environment parameter)""auth_shadow_upgrade"
> 2EETG011 "No shadow system""DB-connect not against shadow tables !"
>
It looks from your log that shadow system is not able to connect to database. Please check your shadow system. Check below link as well:
http://sap.ittoolbox.com/groups/technical-functional/sap-basis/ecc-6-upgrade-issue-in-phase-altntab_fill-1556272
Thanks
Sunny
Edited by: Sunny Pahuja on Oct 15, 2010 1:27 PM

Upgrade issues list

Hi All,
I was wondering if anyone had a list of Upgrade issues (most likely, from ticketting system) to the 5.0 system.
Thanks

Hi mark,
Can u please send me the upgrade issue list to this email address
[email protected]

IDSM-2 - upgrade issue - 5.x to 6.x

Hello All,
I have an issue upgrading the IDSM-2 module I'm playing with.
It is currently running version 5.0(2).
The thing is when I try to upgrade the image to the latest 6.x version using the .bin.gz file, I get the follwing error message :
The filename IPS-IDSM2-K9-sys-1.1-a-6.1-2-E3.bin.gz is not a valid upgrade file type.
Continue with upgrade? []:
There is no image file that is not .bin.gz on the download section of the website. Only recovery images have the .pkg extension.
Does anybody how to troubleshoot this simple(I guess) upgrade issue?
Regards,
Thibault.

You are trying to "upgrade" using a "System Image" (-sys-) file instead of an Upgrade file.
The upgrade file for the IDSM-2 is the standard upgrade file used across almost all IPS/IDS models:
IPS-K9-6.1-2-E3.pkg
It can be downloaded here:
http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/tablebuild.pl/ips6

Frustrating Phone Upgrade issue

We need help with phone upgrade issue we encounter when BestBuy associate process our upgrade. Associate is saying we are not eligible but we have not done any phone upgrade since Jan 2011. Our ATT mobile service was established with BB in 2009 and we only upgraded 2 phones in Jan 2011 thru BB. The only recent change in January 2013 was a change of responsibility between my spouse and me since my company has a better employer discount thru ATT. No change and per ATT, no contract and we should be able to upgrade in any retail store. But BB keeps telling us we have issue with ATT and can do our upgrade only with ATT Corporate Store. Our mobile account is a regular family plan account as originally established with BB and just like any BB customer, have employer's discount attached. I don't understand how BB system communicates with ATT system so it is hard for me to explain to ATT what "error message" BB associate is receiving. It has become so frustrating with BestBuy telling us to check with ATT and then for ATT to tell us that there is no issue at their end. We have been a loyal BB customer with all major appliances bought from them including protection plan. The least they can do is work with their ATT representative to figure out between themselves what the issue is. Here we are willing to give both companies our business with new phones and new contracts and no one can help us out.

LTGee -
I am very sorry to hear about this. I am going to send you a Private Message to collect some information from you to see if we can get to the bottom of this. To check your private messages, ensure you are logged into the forum and click on the envelope on the upper right hand side of the forum.
Thanks!
Jesus|Senior Social Media Specialist | Best Buy® Corporate
Private Message

BPC 7.5 Upgrade - Unary Operator Issue

We have been performing a large upgrade from a previous version of the software and are looking for some help on some of the issues with the upgrade. One of the issues we have been having is that some of our dimensions were using the property "Unary Operator" to have parent members ignore certain child members in their values. We have seen in 7.5 MS that the unary operator doesn't always perform the same and in one instance wouldn't allow other hierarchies to even roll up at all. I guess what i am looking for is a way to have the same affect (limit some children members from rolll up) that Unary Operators had in previous versions, in 7.5. I had looked at other forums and seen that dimension formulas were used to filter out the child members but i was wondering if there were any other viable options.

Hi Kenton,
as Nilanjan wrote if you have a hierarchy all the children will be rolled up to the parent, so works the OLAP.
If you some parents don't correspond to the sum of his children then you must propcess the application to align the parent with the children.
If you don't want to sum some children you must create another subparent with only the children you want or create a dimension member outside of the hierarchy using the dimension formula, but remember that this valur is not memorized, it's calculated during the evdre, that means that a lot of dimension formula will reduce the performance.
Kind regards
Roberto

SAP BPC 7.5 to BPC 10.0 upgrade, problem CPMBPC_800

Hello,
We are currently upgrading BPC 7.5 to BPC 10.0. We want to do an upgrade of our existing BPC 7.5, and not an 'clean' installation of BPC 10.0.
Right now we are having some issues with the´basis part of the upgrade.
We have installed the POASBC 100_730 SP01 (POASBC ABAP component) with no problems
and now we want to install the EPM content in the download package 51040691 (Server components).
In the download package 51040691 - there are two folders 'upgrade' and 'installation'
The files have been uploaded into SAP BW 7.3 and the problem now is in 'saint' - we can see the CPMBPC_800 package, but the type is 'INSTALLATION' and there is not an option to choose 'UPGRADE'
Is 'INSTALLATION' the same as a clean installation - or will the package detect the existing SAP BPC 7.5 and do upgrade instead of an installation ?
All help is appreciated
Thank you,

Hello,
we are facing the same issue. Did somebody solve this problem? Is INSTALLTION the same as UPGRADE?
Kind Regards
Waldemar Brill

BPC 10.0 - Hierarchy Issue

Hi Experts,
I am trying to load a hierarchy to BPC 10.0 and I am having issues.
I am getting the error:
"HIERARCHY DATA SOURCE:
An exception with the type CX_SY_RANGE_OUT_OF_BOUNDS occurred, but was neither handled locally, nor declared in a RAISING clause Part - field access (offset = 4, length - 10) to a data object of the size 11 exceeds valid boundaries.
model: CONSOLIDATION
Package status: Error"
We are going through an upgrade and this was one of my test cases to try. I have all the hierarchy information filled out on the set selection screen (no blanks).
I also tried peeling back the number of levels, and the first 3 loaded successfully, it was the 4th and beyond that would cause this.
In my conversion file I have the first four digits ignored from these values at the 4th + level but it is still considering it all over 10.
One example is "CIGMC500000" so CIGM would be ignored but it is still not allowing it to load.
The prior version we had with this never gave us this problem. Is there a way I can change the hierarchy allowance for the H1 length?

Hi Ryan!
Have you set a condition in your conversion file that the length only can be10 positions or lower?
The example you gave is 11 positions long , even if you remove the 4 first positions the lenght from the BW side will come as 11. So what I think you have to do is to correct your conversion file sop it will allow length above 10 postions.
Please if this dont help, share your conversionfile
Br
Patrick

Dead links after BPC 10.1 upgrade

After upgrading to BPC 10.1 we have this strange issue where after you log into the BPC web front end and you click on various links and nothing happens. For example if you navigate to Administration section (as shown below) and click on the blue links none of them launch. Happen in all of the tabs and sections. We have followed the install guide to the best of our ability and activated all of the correct services in SICF. Happens in all browsers. We are running classic mode if it makes any difference.
Any help would be appreciated. Thanks in advance

Hello Charlie,
there are no dumps and there is no HTTP traffic because the links on the web page point to nowhere.
We are on the SP you wrote, these are all the SW levels on our system, are there any mismatch among them or missing Add-Ons ?
SAP_BASIS    740    0007
SAP_ABA    740    0007
SAP_GWFND    740    0007
SAP_UI    740    0009
PI_BASIS    740    0007
ST-PI    2008_1_710    0009
BI_CONT    757    0002
SAP_BW    740    0007
CPMBPC    810    0002
POASBC    100_731    0005
HANABPC    810    0002
ST-A/PI    01Q_731    0002
Using Firefox if we go in the section Administration, Security, right click on Users and select Inspect Element, this is the content of the inspector, is the href correct?
<a id="home-view-admin-users" data-sap-ui="home-view-admin-users" class="sapUiLnk" title="Add users to the environment and manage their access rights." href="javascript:void(0);" tabindex="0">Users</a>
Best regards,
Valerio

BPC 7.5 upgrade issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for