BPC75NW - Periodic Amount Not Calculating for records with blank YTD value

We are on BPC75NW SP6 and have a YTD consolidation application. Data is loaded on a monthly basis uising a process of importing data files from supplying systems and then loading them into BPC using the data manager append function with a transformation file. YTD amounts are as expected and 'most' periodic amounts are also calculated correctly via MDX mesures in reporting. However, in situations where we have a P&L YTD balance in one month (say January) and then in the next month (February) there is no longer a YTD balance in that P&L account, no record is loaded for February YTD and the system is not calculating any February periodic amount. Example:
January - Load $100 to a P&L Account which is the YTD amount
The January YTD amount = $100.
The January Periodic amount = $100.
February - Load no record to the same P&L account as above (as the YTD amount is now 0)
The February YTD amount in the system is blank
The February Periodic amount in the system is blank (This should be a NEGATIVE $100)
As a possible work around we have also tried to load a 0 to February. The data manager package shows the record as loaded successfully but since it is a 0 it really does not put it into the database.
Surely someone out there has already hit this situation and is willing to share the solution.
Thank you,
Vicki S.

This problem was resolved by installing SAP Note 1405993 - MDX: Error: Invalid MDX command with
CURRENTMEMBER. The current text on the note does not describe our error but SAP will not extend the text to cover this issue.
Prior to installing this note, the following other notes were also installed but they did not fix the periodic calculation issue. Under SAP's advisement we are going to leave them however as 'they should not have any side effects':
1529720 MDX: No data for calculated member and metadata reference
1590976 MDX: Incorrect data for IIF
1584196 MDX: Calculated members and different dimensions
1528374 MDX: System error GET_PRPTY_VALUE-02-
I will now close this message.
Vicki Shrontz

Similar Messages

How to address HP Printer Software Update 3.0, iTunes 12.0.1 update that sits in the App Store, 'Calculating' for days with no install?

The App Store indicates there is a Software Update that appears to include the HP Printer Software Update 3.0 and iTunes 12.0.1
Unfortunately, the software update fails to install. Instead, it just sits there 'Calculating' for days with no progression on the status bar of the overall update.
The update buttons of both the HP Printer Software Update 3.0 and iTunes 12.0.1 are both greyed out, with no progress bar.
Not sure of what the issue is, there is no warning or error dialog box that appears or any indication of an application that may be interfering with the install.
Any advice?
MacBook Pro (17-inch, Early 2011) 2.3 GHz Core i7, 4GB RAM

Thanks for the suggestion. I wanted to install the individual updates but because I had settings to automatically download and install updates, whenever I opened the App Store, the system would try to download and install, preventing me from canceling the update to execute each application update one at a time.
After changing the settings from automatically downloading and applying updates, followed by a restart. I was able to open the App Store and run each individual update.
Thanks again.

V-41 tcode error :Table 304 is not defined for use with condition type PR00

Hi All,
I am trying to create a BDC using the transaction V-41.
The first screen has fields:
ConditionType and Table, where I have to fill values ZPM1 and 800 respectively.
But as soon as I enter the tcode v-41 and say enter, the above mentioned fields are already having the values 'PR00' and ' 304'. Normally if you take an example fo t-code VA02, all fields are blank.
Then an error message is displayed:
Table 304 is not defined for use with condition type PR00
This behaviour is not allowing me to use the BDC feature.
Please advise me on why this is happening. What are the possible solutions I can use to clear these values programmatically?
Can anything be done via customizing?
Regards,
Namita.

Dear ILHAN ,
Well the problem you are facing is having the following solution:
Table 304 is not defined for use with condition type PR00
Message no. VK024
Diagnosis
The selected condition type does not fit in the condition table, that is the basis for the condition record. Alternatively the selected condition type is not included in the condition types that were selected on the selection screen or that are defined in the variant of the standard selection report.
Procedure
Úse F4 help to choose a valid condition type.
If this does not give you the required condition type, check in Customizing for condition types and the related access sequences.
In the condition maintenance also check Customizing for the selection report (pricing report), that you have selected in the navigation tree, using the standard condition table as a reference.
I hope this helps.
It has worked for me.
I gave it a try and what I am getting using the transaction V-41 is create Price condition (PR00) : Fast Entry.
Please award points if you find it useful.
Regards,
Rakesh

TAX not Calculating for Unplanned Delivery cost in MIRO

Dear All,
I am having an issue with Unplanned delivery cost in MIRO,
We have to do an accounting of a invoice/PO which contains in addition to actual Value the Unplanned Delivery cost also, and for which also the TAXes also applicable with ED 10% and ECess 2%,SHcess 1% ,
Now in MIRO if i want to enter these Packing and forwarding chanrges in Unplanned delivery cost, but the TAX rates is not calculating for the same.
The TAX rates are calculating only for the values other than Unplanned delivery cost.
What i want TAX also need to be calculate based on the TAX code choosen in MIRO or as flow that of PO.
I have checked in OMR2, there we have mentioned Default Unplanned delivery cost tax code as ED NIL.
Can any where in the setting we can say by default the TAX rates should calculate as that of PO or whatever TAX codes we have choosen in MIRO.
How to achive this, pl help.
Regards,
Nagaraj S

hi
the screen shot i sent is also of 4.7E
now u can check OMR2 for default tax code for unplanned delivery cost
can u show us the screen shot of the details tab of MIRO
also check in SPR>MM>LIV>Configure How Unplanned Delivery Costs Are Posted
here what value u have maintained ,we are using 2 as (2 Different G/L line)
regards
kunal
Edited by: Kunal Ingale on May 19, 2010 6:18 AM

Rules are not allowed for jobs with set 'archive edited messages only' flag.

Hi,
We are on AEX 7.4 and have enabled user defined search and also setup archiving. Even though the retention period has expired but still the messages are not being
archived.
We see following issues:
1. Unable to setup archiving rule in Runtime Work Bench, we are getting following error:
Rules are not allowed for jobs with set 'archive edited messages only flag.
2. Unable to set the expiration of messages using the following link.Each time we specify the number days it shows the same number of
messages expired.
http://XXXXX:50000/MessagingSystem/job/reorgdb.jsp
3. However if we click on "remove messages" button the messages are getting deleted which tells me that the messages are not matching any
archiving rule hence are being removed.
Any pointers to the above issue are appreciated!!!
Thanks,
Rajeev

Hi,
Please check the [link|http://www.****************/Tutorials/XI/Archiving/Index.htm]
Also check this
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/402fae48-0601-0010-3088-85c46a236f50?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=147266890
Regards,
Naveen.

Error: "posting period is not defined for fiscal year variant" in FBICS3

Hi,
I got error "posting period is not defined for fiscal year variant" when I execute t code FBICS3.
I checked in OB29 & t code FBIC010 & noted that the fiscal year variant had ben maintained.
Please advice.

HI,
It was noted that the mentioned t code had been maintain but below mentioned error appear:
Posting period is not defined for fiscal year variant
Message no. GU506
Diagnosis
You have tried to determine a posting date in fiscal year variant for period , fiscal year , but this period is not defined for the variant.
Procedure
You maintain fiscal year variants in table T009.
It was referring to t code OB29. I have checked the detail, in OB29 also details maintain.
Please advice why the error still prompt.

Doesn't play songs, "itunes is not configured for use with mac-formatted"??

Hi, new ipod shuffle. Seems to charge fine, all indicator lights function as expected. Everything looks fine in itunes. But it doesn't play songs. I have the most recent versions of itunes and the ipod software. Re-set, updated, and restored, nothing works. Even restored using the restore utility. Re-started computer. Checked for volume control. Won't play songs. Tried different file types. Songs play fine from itunes library and from the device's library within itunes. Tried different headphones. Hooked it up to computer speakers. Turning volume all the way up on device and speakers, heard some very faint rhythmic static, so my guess is the jack socket (or whatever you call it) is just messed up, but it seems weird that it can transfer power and data to the device but doesn't work for sound...
The only other issues that have come up is that the drive disappears in explorer once it syncs with itunes. Other people who've noticed this seem to have completely different problems so I don't think it's related.
Also, I have MacDrive on my computer. And when it starts up with the ipod plugged in, MacDrive offers the message "Itunes is not configured for use with Mac-formatted ipods." It offers to automatically reconfigure itunes so it can read mac-formatted ipods. Since I've restored the device, I don't see why formatting should be an issue so I say "no."
Should I try letting macdrive do its format thing? Should I try formatting the ipod disk on the My Computer menu? Or should I just email apple and tell them the jack's busted?
Thanks for any thoughts!

Well, I have had my iPod for about 3 years, it is a 4th generation non-video 40 GB. One day it just stopped working, and now it does not play any songs. when I turn it on it makes this odd whirring sounds that computers make when they try really hard to do something. I cannot charge it, and it is not recognized by iTunes. Also when I turn it on, I get the apple.com/ipod/support (or whatever it is) screen. Needless to say, my warranty is expired, and so I cannot do anything for it except get a new battery, or buy a new one. Is there any way to fix this problem, or anyone out there who is experiencing the same thing?
I'm having the exact same problem with my wife's iPod. However it will play about 3 seconds of a song and go onto the next song.
If there is anyone out there that can help please do!
Windows XP

ESS Business Package Error: Period type not allowed for profile ESS

Hi,
We are trying to configure the business package for Employee Self Service on Enterprise Portal 6.0. We followed this SDN contribution <a href="https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/21eb036a-0a01-0010-25a3-b2224432640a">ESS doc guide</a>
So far we have successfully deployed the business packages and followed all the configurations that were pointed out in the doc guide. Unfortunately when we try to access the Employee Self-Service portal pages (Overview, Employee Search, etc), we encounter this error:
Critical Error:
Period type not allowed for profile ESS, error key: RFC_ERROR_SYSTEM_FAILURE
com.sap.tc.webdynpro.modelimpl.dynamicrfc.WDDynamicRFCExecuteException: Period type not allowed for profile ESS, error key: RFC_ERROR_SYSTEM_FAILURE
Any ideas on how to fix this issue?
Regards,
Jojo

Hi Jojo,
Have you solved the problem? If yes can you please help me even I am facing the same error.
this is very help full to me .
Thanks and Regards,
Shilpi.

The demand of my application is that i can not replace for loop with a while loop.because i need fixed number of iterations and as far as i know fixed iterations could be only with possible with the for loop.

the demand of my application is that i can not replace for loop with a while loop.because i need fixed number of iterations and as far as i know fixed iterations could be only with possible with the for loop.
your recommended second option that i could add true/false case.
this true/false case must be inside the for loop or outside the for loop?if this case is inside the for
loop, how can i send stop command from outer while
loop?
more over do you have any example for this please?
thanks"

You can execute a fixed number of iterations using a while loop by comparing the iteration count to the number of iterations you want and wiring the output of that comparison (e.g. Less Than or Equal To) to the continue (or stop) terminal of your while loop. Which comparison you use depends on personal preference, where you wire the desired count and the interation count, and whether you're using the while loop as Continue if True or Stop if True.
Ben gave you step-by-step instructions in response to your previous question. Look here for Ben's response.
Ben's response looks pretty good and detailed to me. It certa
inly deserved better than a 1-star rating.

InvalidKeyException: Could not initialize for signing with the given key

InvalidKeyException: Could not initialize for signing with the given key
What does this caused? And how can I make following code to work? Is it bug, or is it supposed to do so?
X509CertImpl newCert = new X509CertImpl(certInfo);
newCert.sign(caPrivateKey, SIG_ALG_NAME);

Your key is probably using a different algorithm:
Signature signature =
Signature.getInstance( SIGNATURE_ALGORITHM );
PrivateKey privKey =
( PrivateKey ) this.store.getKey( alias, pwd );
Make sure the SIGNATURE_ALGORITHM (SHA1WithRSA, SHA1WithDSA)
matches the algoright of the keystore.
your will see it when casting the private key into a concrete
key instance:
RSAPrivateKey privKey =
( RSAPrivateKey ) this.store.getKey( alias, pwd );

TS2755 this accessory is not optimal for use with this iphone keeps popping up on my phone how do i stop it?

This accessory is not optimal for use with this iphone keeps popping up on my phone how do i stop it?

Can be caused by lint, dirt, or foreign material in the dock connector port and it doesn't take much.
Can also be caused by damage to the pins in the dock connector port including moisture damage.

Why Segment shrink is not supported for tables with function-based indexes

As we all know , Segment shrink is not supported for tables with function-based indexes.
But i'm very confused .
Why Segment shrink is not supported for tables with function-based indexes ?? what's its essential?

Creating a function based index creates a hidden virtual column (you'll see it if you query user_tab_cols) and once you index a virtual column you can no longer shrink the table:orcl> create table t1(c1 number,c2 as (c1 * 2)) segment creation immediate;
Table created.
orcl> alter table t1 enable row movement;
Table altered.
orcl>
orcl> alter table t1 shrink space;
Table altered.
orcl> create index i2 on t1(c2);
Index created.
orcl> alter table t1 shrink space;
alter table t1 shrink space
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-10631: SHRINK clause should not be specified for this object
orcl>so the issue is not with function based indexes per se, it is a level beneath that. Perhaps because the virtual column has no physical existance, when the row is moved there is no reason for Oracle to realize that an index needs updating? I haven't attempted to reverse engineer this, I would be interested to know if anyone else has.

PO Release Strategy not triggerred for particular Total Net Order Value

Dear,
I am currently facing the issue where release strategy for purchase orders is not getting triggered for a particular value or lower.
For order value 1 INR or less, no release strategy is triggered for new created PO. And for value > 1 INR release strategy is getting triggered.
All otehr PO characterstics are the same, I mean to say the values for other characterstics such as plant material group are identical.
But the characterstics for release for Total net order value are <= 30000 INR. There are two system copies, where in one system the same release strategy is working as expected. But in other system the above mentioned issue occurs. There is no differnce which I can see in the release strategy setup.
Please suggest for solution.
Thank you.
Warm Regards.

Dear All,
While looking further into the issue by going into debugging mode, we have found that in include LCLSCF2I, Internal table p_selection_criteria_tab , the value for ATFLV (Internal Floating point from) gets different values in the two systems. For example, in the affected system, for PO with 1INR tottal value, for one of the Total value chaaracterstics before INR characterstic, ATFLV value is 0,0000000000000000E+00, hence it gets out of loop and doesn't trigger release strategy.
But in another system for same PO values and release setup, ATFLV value is 1,0000000000000000E+00 for that characterstic.
May I know how the value for this field gets calculated.
Thank you.
Warm Regards.

TS3274 After iPad update I can't access my notes! Crashes opening with blank page. I have tried turning on and off. I have tried the reset to original. I have tried downloading again. Now what? I have important information that I need to get....

After iPad update I can't access my notes! Crashes opening with blank page. I have tried turning on and off. I have tried the reset to original. I have tried downloading again. Now what? I have important information that I need to get....

If you have set this phone up, then there would not necessarily be a solution here until you have been verify with the provider that everything is provisioned correctly on their end. Since the 3G comes from your cellular provider, if the settings are correct on the phone, then you should work with the carrier next.

OpenDocument issue with blank prompt values

We have implemented optional prompts in XI R2 by joining our prompt objects with an 'Empty' object. When we create openDocument hyperlinks to these reports, passing nothing for the prompt objects worked just fine and the target report did not prompt for any values for these prompts, e.g. if there was a prompt on the report called Country and it was joined with an Empty ("") universe object via an AND, setting the Country prompt in the openDocument as lsSCountry= worked just fine.
In XI 3.1, when these hyperlinks are accessed from the master reports via InfoView, the target report is prompting for all prompts that accept empty (blank) inputs. If the resulting hyperlink shortcut is copied and pasted directly in the browser URL, everything works fine, i.e. target report does not prompt for any of the empty values and the report is displayed correctly.
We even tried using the 'no_value' option for these prompts in the openDocument but since these are universe based prompts that can't be defined as optional, no_value is not allowed.
Anybody facing similar behavior?
Thanks.

Please re-post if this is still an issue or purchase a case and have a dedicated support engineer work with you directly

BPC75NW - Periodic Amount Not Calculating for records with blank YTD value

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for