BPM Sync/Async Scenario: error: "Timeout condition of pipeline reached"..!

Hi,
I am doing Sync/Async BPM scenario.
-> Receive message and process and response back to the sender.
Sometimes it will correct correctly. Sometime the message will come and stay in XI and fails with error
<SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="1">
<SAP:Category>XIServer</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="INTERNAL">PL_TIMEOUT</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1 />
<SAP:P2 />
<SAP:P3 />
<SAP:P4 />
<SAP:AdditionalText />
<SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
<SAP:Stack>Timeout condition of pipeline reached</SAP:Stack>
<SAP:Retry>N</SAP:Retry>
</SAP:Error>
I observed that the messages will stay in transaction "SXMS_SAMON" . and will fail after sometime.
What might be the reason. ? what need to do to stop these kind of errors?
Thanks
Deepthi.

Hi Praveen,
Webservice <--> XI -->BW .
BPM :
start ->Receive(Request)> Transformation(Responsemap)>Send(SendtoBW)->Send(Send Response) ---> stop.
Messages are getting struck in SMQ1 and SM58 at these three points.
1. Message comes and stays in SXMB_MONI in status "Log Version"
The messages are stuck in SMQ1 in READY status without doing any processing.
XBQO$PE_WS90100002 WORKFLOW_LOCAL_100 1 READY 26.02.2009
Once I push the queue by Activating/Unlocking, it will process.
2. when it is trying to send the message to R/3 (Backend system) it is waiting in SM58 with below entry.
WF-BATCH SWW_WI_EXECUTE_INTERNAL_RFC WORKFLOW_LOCAL_100 Transaction recorded
Manually I execute LUW to push it. Once I done the message will go to R/3 system and Response mapping also complete.
3. Again it is waiting at SM58 with below deatails while sending the response to sender.
PIAFUSER SWW_WI_COMP_EVENT_RECEIVE_IBF WORKFLOW_LOCAL_100 Transaction recorded
we are again manually execute LUW. Once we done the response message will go back to Sender.
Any Idea to solve this..?
Thanks
Deepthi

Similar Messages

BPM Error: Timeout condition of pipeline reached- After transporting to Prd

Hi,
I am doing Sync/Async BPM scenario.
-> Receive message and process it and send to BI and response has to send back to the sender.
start ->Receive(Request)> Transformation(Responsemap)>Send(SendtoR/3)->Send(Send Response) ---> stop.
It is working correctly in Test system. We transported to production and we are getting the below error.
<SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="1">
<SAP:Category>XIServer</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="INTERNAL">PL_TIMEOUT</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1 />
<SAP:P2 />
<SAP:P3 />
<SAP:P4 />
<SAP:AdditionalText />
<SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
<SAP:Stack>Timeout condition of pipeline reached</SAP:Stack>
<SAP:Retry>N</SAP:Retry>
</SAP:Error>
I crossed checked with the test system configuration and evything looks similar. Moreover there are someother Sync/Async BPM scenarios which are all working perfectly.
Kindly help me , What might be the reason. ?
Thanks
Deepthi.

Some of the trace:
-->
<Trace level="1" type="T">Get definition of external pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-LOOKUP_INTERNAL_PL_ID" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">Corresponding internal pipeline SAP_CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST" />
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_RECEIVER_DETERMINATION">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_RD_PLSRV-ENTER_PLSRV">
<Trace level="1" type="T">R E C E I V E R - D E T E R M I N A T I O N</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Cache Content is up to date</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST" />
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_INTERFACE_DETERMINATION">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_ID_PLSRV-ENTER_PLSRV">
<Trace level="1" type="T">I N T E R F A C E - D E T E R M I N A T I O N</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Cache Content is up to date</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST" />
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_RECEIVER_MESSAGE_SPLIT">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_PLSRV_RECEIVER_SPLIT-ENTER_PLSRV">
<Trace level="1" type="T">number of receivers: 1</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Single-receiver split case</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST" />
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_MAPPING_REQUEST">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_MAPPING_XMS_PLSRV3-ENTER_PLSRV">
<Trace level="1" type="T">No mapping required</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST" />
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_OUTBOUND_BINDING">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL">
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_PLSRV_OUTBINDING-ENTER_PLSRV" />
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST" />
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_CALL_ADAPTER" />
- 
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL" />
- 
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="SA_COMM">
<Trace level="1" type="T">Start Sync/Async Communication</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="Timestamp">2009-08-17T04:48:09Z AUSNSW Starting Processing</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Pipeline Timeout: 17.08.2009 15:08:10 AUSNSW</Trace>
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_PLSRV_CALL_BPE-ENTER_PLSRV">
<Trace level="1" type="T">--start sender interface action determination</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">select interface OS_Payment</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">select interface namespace http://sap.com/FOC/DirectSales/Payments</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">--start receiver interface action determination</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Loop 0000000001</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">select interface AS_Payment</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">select interface namespace http://sap.com/SAP_PI/DirectSales/Payment</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">--no sender or receiver interface definition found</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Hence set action to DEL</Trace>

Sync/Async brdige error in BPM

Hi,
I am working on RFC-TO-Webservice scenario(Synchronous) and I am using the BPM in this scenario.
In BPM just I have used 2 steps.
Receive - Opened Sync/Async bridge
Send - Synchrouns step
Send - Cloase the Receive step
Send - Asynchrous send step (to send the response to the file...).
When I sent my RFC message from R/3 I am getting following error.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
- 
- <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="1">
<SAP:Category>XIServer</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="INTERNAL">PL_TIMEOUT</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1 />
<SAP:P2 />
<SAP:P3 />
<SAP:P4 />
<SAP:AdditionalText />
<SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
<SAP:Stack>Timeout condition of pipeline reached</SAP:Stack>
<SAP:Retry>N</SAP:Retry>
</SAP:Error>
I am using PI 7.0 SP13 is why I am not able to receive the Sync message in BPM...I have created the abstract interface based on RFC...getting the first message itself Timeout error.
I am trying to use Sync/Asnc bridge in BPM. First message itself PL_TIMEOUT error..bpm is not able to receive my rfc request...
I need help on this...do I need to do any settings in WEBAS level..I did Timeout setting in SXMB_ADM.
Regards,
Venu.

hi,
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/1403 [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken]
check this blog..and same thing I did in my scenario
my scenario is RFC-TO-Webservice.
Sync/Async bridge can't we use like this ...Receiver step(open sync/async)-> Send(Synchronous)-Send(Close sync bridge)....that way can't we use ...
I am not able to receive the RFC request itself inside my BPM first step...getting the Timeout error.
But when I use the RECEIVE STEP with Asynchronous mode..I am able to receive the message inside my bpm.Incase of Synchronous I am not able to receive the message..
I am working PI 7.0 and SP13..did any body worked this version...
Thanks,
venu.

PL_TIMEOUT in Sync Async scenario using BPM

Hello:
We sporadically get PL_TIMEOUT error in a S/A scenario. Every time the error occurs when it is trying to close the Synch Asynch bridge in the BPM. The BPM is extremely simple but it often runs for a long time (5-8 minutes) esp in the close S/A bridge step. The timeout parameters are set as follows
TIMEOUT=60 sec
PROCTIMEOUT=900 sec
CHECK_FOR_ASYNC_RESPONSE_TIMEOUT=500 sec (increased this from the default 60 sec recently)
Would increasing TIMEOUT or CHECK_FOR_ASYNC_RESPONSE_TIMEOUT parameters help?
- <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="1">
<SAP:Category>XIServer</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="INTERNAL">PL_TIMEOUT</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1 />
<SAP:P2 />
<SAP:P3 />
<SAP:P4 />
<SAP:AdditionalText />
<SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
<SAP:Stack>Timeout condition of pipeline reached</SAP:Stack>
<SAP:Retry>N</SAP:Retry>
</SAP:Error>

Hi venkat,
These Threads will help you.
"PL_TIMEOUT" error
Help on PL_TIMEOUT error in BPM
Reward points if usefull...

Correlation issue in JMS adapter - SYNC/ASYNC scenario without BPM

Hi,
I am working on a SYNC/ASYNC scenario with JMS adapter without using BPM. My scenario is SOAP<>PI>JMS. I configured the interface as below:
1. SOAP Sender channel
2. JMS Receiver Channel writing to Queue A.
     Module used:      a. RequestOneWayBean
               b. WaitResponseBean
     Correlation Settings:
               a. Set JMS Correlation ID to "XI Message ID"
               b. Store JMS CorrelationID of request (Checked)
               c. Set JMS Property to "JMS Correlation Id"
               d. Value = "XI MEssage ID"
3. JMS Sender channel reading from queue B ( I am exporting the message from queue A and importing into queue B)
     Module used:      a. NotifyResponseBean
     Correlation Settings:
               a. Set XI MEssage Id to "GUID"
               b. Set XI Conversation ID to "Stored JMS COrrelationID of Request"
I can see the cid in the message from queue A. But I observed thhat the header format of the message in Queue A is "MQSTR".
ISSUE:
1. While writing the message to queue A, below adapter log details(part b) concerned me:
     a. Message '8747a7c2-2b06-11df-8055-005056a70ed6' successfully processed by channel
     b. Could not create acknowledgements for message '8747a7c2-2b06-11df-8055-005056a70ed6'
I am not sure why I am receiving the message that " could not create acknowledgements"
2. While reading the message from the sender channel,I consistently get the error message as below:
     a. XI message ID corresponding to JMS message with ID 'ID:414d51205341504449442e514d202020c67b954b20005602'
          will be created as a new GUID with value '21bca916-424f-41f6-3347-c71090392b58'
     b. Error while processing message '21bca916-424f-41f6-3347-c71090392b58'; detailed error description:
          com.sap.aii.adapter.jms.api.channel.filter.MessageFilterException: found no correlation ID: RecoverableException:
          found no correlation ID at com.sap.aii.adapter.jms.core.channel.filter.SendToModuleProcessorFilter.filter(SendToModuleProcessorFilter.java:105) ...
Below are the blogs which I have already gone through:
1. JMS Synchronous Scenario without BPM - Correlation Settings and Transactional JMS Session
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/index?rid=/library/uuid/b028f6f6-7da5-2a10-19bd-cf322cf5ae7b
2. Note: 1086303
3. Sync / Async Bridge without BPM
In the note, they mentioned something about header being "MQRFH2". BUt in our case, the header is "MSSTR". Not sure whether it makes any difference.
Please help.
Edited by: GP on Mar 9, 2010 4:24 AM

Hi,
detailed error description:
com.sap.aii.adapter.jms.api.channel.filter.MessageFilterException: found no correlation ID: RecoverableException:
found no correlation ID at com.sap.aii.adapter.jms.core.channel.filter.SendToModuleProcessorFilter.filter(SendToModuleProcessorFilter.java:105) ...
This error would generally arose when there are multiple messages, got stuck in the outbound queue. Try to stop both the sender and receiver JMS comunication channels and clear both the inbound and outbound queues.
Once all the messages in the queue are cleraed, try posting the message again.
Regards,
Swetha.

BPM Sync/Async Problem

I am trying to setup the sync/Async bridge.Scenario is below.
Receive (Open Sync/Async Bridge) --> Send Async > Receive Async> Send (Close sync/Async)
I am doing exactly those steps which is provided in Pattern.
Following are in the interfaces.
Sync Interface to post message to BPM (OutBound)
(This interface is exposed as WebService)
Abstract Sync Interface used by BPM.
Async Abstract Interface for Request Message used by Container.
Async Abstract Interface for Response Message used by Container.
Async Inbound Interface to receive message sent by BPM in Async Send Process.
Async Outbound Interface to send message to BPM by Async Receive.
All the configuration Sender agreement/receieve agreement/interface determination/Receive Determination looks fine.
On posting soap data I get the following exception.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>

<SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="1">
     <SAP:Category>XIServer</SAP:Category>
     <SAP:Code area="RCVR_DETERMINATION">NO_RECEIVER_CASE_BE</SAP:Code>
     <SAP:P1/>
     <SAP:P2/>
     <SAP:P3/>
     <SAP:P4/>
     <SAP:AdditionalText/>
     <SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace=""/>
     <SAP:Stack>No receiver could be determined</SAP:Stack>
     <SAP:Retry>N</SAP:Retry>
</SAP:Error>
Any pointers will be great help!
Thanks,
Samir

Hi Samir
As you are trying Sync/Async BPM scenario and having a webservice as your sender,go through this link as it is quite similar to your scenario--
https://www.sdn.sap.com/sdn/weblogs.sdn?blog=/pub/wlg/1403 [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken]
If you still face error then post it in forum.
Regards
Arpit Seth

In BPM sync/async Step , can you have different message schema?

Scenario:
File to XI to BPM to SOAP to RFC
In order to trigger the webservice , I use a dummy file which will be polled at a certain frequency- once in 30 minutes in Test mode - this will call the Webservice. The answer of webservice is sent to RFC Async.
so these are the Repository objects I created :
1. File Outbound Async Message Interface- Output Message (File_Request_MT)
2.File Abstract Message Interface-Output Message (File_Request_MT)
3.Async/ sync bridge Abstract interface to call the Webservice
4 Webservice Inbound Sync Message interface- with both input and output message
5.RFC Inbound Async message interface- input message (RFC_Request)
6 RFC Abstract Async Message interface-input message (RFC_Request)
BPM
a) Receive step which uses the the object 2.
b) Sync send which uses object 3
c) Send step which uses Object 5
I am using a BPM to Receive the file data/ "request " by using the File abstract message interface
Then use the the object 3 to call the webservice in BPM .
My question is on this step
Can I have for the abstract Interface(Object 3) the Request message as File_Request_MT and
response message as (RFC_Request) ?
I use a message mapping to map Input and Ouput message of Object 3 with Object 4.
Thanks for your insight

Raj,
Thanks for the feedback , but I have a question regarding your reply
Interface Objects
Object 1: File_Request_Abs
Object 2: Soap_Response_Abs
Object 3:Soap_Abs_Synch
Output Message:File_Request_Abs
Input Message:Soap_Response_Abs
Object 4:Rfc_Request_Abs
The question is about
a)SOAP_RESPONSE_ABS : could you please tell me why do we need an abstract interface -SOAP_RESPONSE_ABS?
I created a message type MT_SOAP_RESPONSE and used that in the BPM sync Send step as the Input message.
b)Soap_Abs_Synch- I am using message types
MT_File_request and MT_SOAP_Response From your reponse, it looks like you are suggesting to use
Abstract Interfaces as Output message and Input Message, am I correct? Could you please tell me whether this has advantages over using message types MT_file_request and MT_soap_reponse? I haven't used Abstract interfaces before as Input message and output message; infact, I wasn't even aware that it can be. Please confirm that it is possible. Thank you for increasing my knowledge !!!
These are the Objects I created
Message Type :
a) MT_Filerequest
b) MT_SOAPresponse
Message Interface
a)MI_Filerequest_out_async -
Output message
Mess. type MT_filerequst
b)MI_filerequest_async_abs-
Mess. type MT_filerequst
Used
i) used for BPM receiver step- container definition
ii) receiver determination
c)MI_webservice_sync_in - This is created from External definition
d)MI_webservice_sync_abs-
Input message - MT_soapresponse
Output message- MT_fierequest
Used:
i) used for BPM sync send step ,
ii)Interface mapping between MI_Webservice_sync_in and MI_webservice_sync_abs
iii)Container element-SOAP_response
e) MI_RFC_async_out
Input message
RFC_Request(This is imported from RFC definition)
g) MI_RFC_async_abs
Input message
RFC_Request(This is imported from RFC definition)
Mapping
Message mapping
i)Filerequest_TO_SOAPrequest
Source: MT_Filerequest
Target: SOAPrequest(Got from External definition)
ii)SOAPresponse_TO_BPM_response
Source : SOAPresponse(got from External definition)
Target : MT_SOAPresponse
Interface Mapping
i)IM_BPM_TO_SOAP
Source Interface : MI_webservice_sync_abs
Target :MI_webservice_sync_in
uses following message mapping
Request : filerequest_TO_SOAPrequest
Response:SOAPresponse_TO_BPM_response
BPM container element
i)Receiver_container TYPE MI_Filerequest_out_async
ii)SOAP Responsecontainer TYPE MI_webservice_sync_abs
iii)RFC_Request_container TYPE MI_RFC_async_abs
BPM flow
Receive---->Send Synch-->Transformation----->Send Asynch
Receive -
> receiver_container
Send Synch -
> receiver_container(Request Message), Soap_response_container(Response Message)
Transformation -
> Source(Soap_response_container), Target(RFC_request_container)
Send Asynch -
> RFC_request_container
Thanks for your help!!!

BPM Sync/Async Bridge

Hi,
I am trying to build a Async/Sync Bridge in BPM. However the difference is that I need the response to be sent to a different third party to the one which sent it.
The complete scenario is as follows: A third party sends an XML file - this is picked up with the file adapter. PI then does the appropriate mapping and calls a BAPI on ECC. The response is then sent back to PI and sent to a different third parties WebService.
I have followed the document "Demonstrating How to Use Async/Sync Bridge in BPM" by Leela Ratna Morampudi.
Sending the response back to the original sender is straight forward engough. However Im not sure how to send it back to a different third party? Is this possible? Any help would be appreciated
Also, Is it possible to build this scenario using a JMS Async/Sync bridge and avoid using a BPM?
Rg,
Krishneel

Hi Swarup,
Thanks for your posts.
I have built everything, however I'm facing some problems with the RFC receiver. In the communication channel monitor I see this error:
Message processing failed. Cause: com.sap.engine.interfaces.messaging.api.exception.MessagingException: com.sap.aii.adapter.rfc.afcommunication.RfcAFWException: error while processing message to remote system:com.sap.aii.adapter.rfc.core.client.RfcClientException: could not get functionname from XML requst: com.sap.aii.adapter.rfc.RfcAdapterException: failed to read funtionname from XML document: missing namespace declaration(2)
Do you know what could be wrong?
I have already tried reimporting the BAPI and refreshing the caches without any luck.
Thanks,
Krishneel

BPM sync-async bridge returns status "to be delivered"

Hi experts!
I have a BPM consisting of the following steps:
1. Receive (open S/A bridge): Msg SalesOrder
2. Transformation: create Msg SalesOrderResponse
3. Send (close S/A bridge): SalesOrderResponse (to sending system)
4. Send (async send): SalesOrder (to receiver system)
RWB shows 4 messages when the scenario is executed:
Sender - BPM
BPM - BPM
BPM - Sender
BPM - Receiver
The BPM works in that both the sender and receiver system receives the expected messages (SalesOrderResponse and SalesOrder), but the RWB returns the status "To be delivered" for the message from Sender to BPM and from BPM to BPM.
SXMB_MONI shows one message only, which is successful, and the PE_ADAPTER shows the BPM as completed.
Do you know why the status is "to be delivered", when the messages are received correctly at both sender and receiver system?
How can we make all messages involved in the scenario successful?
Thank you very much for any help!
Br,
Kenneth

Thank you, but I have already re-created all interfaces and the BPM in IR, and reimported to ID. I do not get any error messages anywhere, SXI_CACHE is OK (return code 0 for BPM), SWWL contains no old processes.
Another maybe useful piece of information:
the two messages returning "To be delivered" status in RWB both exist for Integration Engine. The first, for Sender -> BPM, the inbound channel is AENGINE and outbound channel is SA_COMM. Could it be that SA_COMM does not notify AENGINE that it has received the message?
The other message with the same status is from BPM -> BPM, with message interface SalesOrderResponse_ABS both for sender and receiver, which I don't understand why. This interface should only be used from BPM to sender... There is no inbound or outbound channel specified for this message.
So is the BPM sending some information to itself through the same message interface?
Any clues?

Need help with scenario BPM Http-RFC Sync/async bridge

hi all!
i've got the following scenario: HTTP-BPM(XI)-RFC synchronous both of them. for that, i'm using S/A bridge in the BPM, but i'm getting the error 'Timeout condition of pipeline reached'. i think the problem is that the process gets lost in the sync/async communication, because in the trace level shows CL_XMS_PLSRV_CALL_BPE-ENTER_PLSRV" and after that every message are 'wait time starting'.
don't know the reason of the error. Maybe I missed something to configure?
the BPM is like this:
Receiver(Open Sync/Async bridge) -> Transformation (mapping from http request to RFC request) -> SyncSend (RFC request and response) -> Transformation (mapping from rfc response to http response) -> Send (Close S/A Bridge)
the IR is configured like this:
Message Types u2013 External Definitions u2013 Imported Objects
mt_cxml_request -> contains xsd of xcml request template.
mt_cxml_response -> contains xsd of xcml response template.
zintegracion_pedidos -> imported RFC from R/3
zintegracion_pedidos.response -> imported RFC from R/3
Message Interfaces
mi_cxml_request_async_abs
mi_cxml_request_sync_abs
mi_cxml_request_sync_out
mi_xcml_response_async
mi_rfc_request_asyn_abs
mi_rfc_request_sync_abs
mi_rfc_request_sync_in
mi_rfc_response_async_abs
Message Mappings
mm_cxml_request_to_rfc_request -> mapping from http request (cxml) to rfc request.
mm_rfc_response_to_cxml_response -> mapping from rfc response to http response (cxml).
Interface Mappings
im_cxml_request_async_abs_to_rfc_request_async_abs
im_rfc_response_async_abs_to_cxml_response_async_abs
and the ID is configured like this:
Business system DES -> created business system for RFC adapter with interface mi_rfc_request_sync_in as receiver. Comunication channel u2018RFC Receiveru2019
Businnes service VW -> created businnes service for HTTP adapter with interface mi_cxml_request_sync_out as sender. Comunication channel u2018HTTP Senderu2019
Receiver Determination
two receiver determinations. One for BPM and the other one for RFC(R/3):
|VW| mi_cxml_request_sync_out:
|BPM_PO| mi_rfc_request_sync_abs:
Interface Determination
two interface determinations:
|VW| mi_cxml_request_sync_out | | BPM_PO:
|BPM_PO| mi_rfc_request_sync_abs | * | * :
Sender Agreement
VW
mi_cxml_request_sync_out
Receiver Agreement
|BPM_PO| |DES| mi_rfc_request_sync_in

hi all,
i've removed the transformations from the BPM, and i've created:
in IR:
- interface mapping: im_xcml_request_to_rfc_request_sync_abs
                                source interface: mi_cxml_request-sync_abs
                                target interface: mi_rfc_request_sync_abs
in ID:
- receiver determination: |VW| mi_cxml_request_sync_abs
                                  sender service: VW
                                  interface: mi_cxml_request_sync_abs
                                  receiver: DES
                                  interface mapping:im_xcml_request_to_rfc_request_sync_abs
- interface determination: |VW| mi_cxml_erquest_sync_abs ||
                                     sender service: VW
                                     interface: mi_cxml_request_sync_abs
                                     inbound interface: mi_rfc_request_sync_abs
                                     interface mapping: im_xcml_request_to_rfc_request_sync_abs
- receiver agreement: |VW| |DES| mi_rfc_request_sync_abs
                               sender service: VW
                               receiver service: DES
                               receiver interface: mi_rfc_request_sync_abs
not sure these are the steps i had to do for mapping xml to rfc. but the result is the same error as before, the timeout.
i couldn't test with RTW because i'm getting an error 401 unauthorized.
i'd do it without BPM but the issue is that i wanted to add another step that would be to send the response from rfc to mail too once i got this BPM running. i mean, the response from RFC would be sent to http response and mail both.
the only way i can imagine to do it is with BPM but i'm really fed up with it.
thank u very much folks

Sync Web Service - BPM with 2 sync proxy calls error.

Hi.
Have a sync web service going into a BPM.
In the BPM there ar 2 sync calls towards a system making a credit check.
The answer is responded to the web service.
In our QA system the solution works perfect.
I transported the solution to production and when I test the web service call towards I get the following error.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
- 
- <SAP:Error SOAP:mustUnderstand="1" xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
<SAP:Category>XIServer</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="INTERNAL">PL_TIMEOUT</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1 />
<SAP:P2 />
<SAP:P3 />
<SAP:P4 />
<SAP:AdditionalText />
<SAP:Stack>Timeout condition of pipeline reached</SAP:Stack>
<SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
</SAP:Error>
Does anybody have an idea why I get the error.
When I check my config everything looks the same.
Looks like we never send the first sync call to the proxy when I check in SXMB_MONI and the BPM gets terminated.
We have just migrated the solution from XI 3.0 to PI 7.11.
BR
Kalle

Hi.
How will that help if we do not send the message.
When I check the graphics in SXMB_MONI the error occours befor we send the first message with proxy.
Also extend ASYNC timeout?
We are using sync communication.
BR
Kalle

BPM real time scenarios

Hi,
I need to know when actually bpm is uesd and what are the real time scenarios

BPM in XI
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/xi/integrationProcess%28ccBPM%29inXI&
BPM-1
Walkthrough with BPM
BPM-2
Reconciliation of Messages in BPM
BPM-3
RFC Scenario using BPM --Starter Kit
BPM-4
The specified item was not found.
Schedule BPM
Schedule Your BPM
Use of Synch - Asynch bridge in ccBPM
Demonstrating Use of Synchronous-Asynchronous Bridge to Integrate Synchronous and Asynchronous systems using ccBPM in SAP Xi
Use of Synch - Asynch bridge in ccBPM
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/1403 [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken]
without BPM
Sync/Async scenarios without BPM
without BPM1
Sync/Async communication in JMS adapter without BPM (SP19)
IDOC BPM
IDOCs (Multiple Types) Collection in BPM
multimapping without BPM
/people/jin.shin/blog/2006/02/07/multi-mapping-without-bpm--yes-it146s-possible
A Step-by-Step Guide to BPM - Asynch/Sync Bridge
http://www.riyaz.net/blog/index.php/2008/04/16/a-step-by-step-guide-to-bpm-asynch-sync-bridge/
1:n Multi-Mapping using BPM
http://www.riyaz.net/blog/index.php/2008/04/23/xipi-1n-multi-mapping-using-bpm/

Sync/Async without BPM

Hello Experts,
Can you please post your experiences on this issue.
I am working on this SYNC/ASYNC scenario.
REQUEST
ABAP Proxy -> PI -> JMS receiver adatper -> IBM MQ
RESPONSE
IBM MQ --> JMS Sender adapter -> JMS receiver adapter
Here it is going into a loop. The JMS sender adapter sends response back to the JMS receiver, but the JMS receiver thinks it is from the source sender SAP and sends it back toe IBM MQ, and this goes into a loop. Meaning, MQ receives this as a new request and proceses it and sends back a new response going into a loop.
The reponse is sent back to the receiver, which is waiting. How does the JMS receiver know the message is a response not from Request. Please post your experiences.
I need to know based on help.sap.com-http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/45/20d2b4c20a0732e10000000a155369/content.htm, the correct Receiver Agreements, and Receiver determinations for this scenario.
Thanks for your answers.
-praveen

Hi Praveen,
This looks straightforward if you are using the sync-async bridge modules.
Sync/Async Bridge in the Receiver JMS Adapter
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_tm70/helpdata/en/45/20d2b4c20a0732e10000000a155369/frameset.htm
Sync/Async communication in JMS adapter without BPM
/people/venkataramanan.parameswaran/blog/2007/01/18/syncasync-communication-in-jms-adapter-without-bpm-sp19
Basically, in one configuration, you use RequestOnewayBean to send a request to your JMS receiver and then wait for a response at WaitResponeBean. In another configuration, where you are sending back a response, you use NotifyResponeBean to send this response back to the waiting call.
Regards, Yza

Exercise for sync/async bridge scenario

Hi,
Can anybody send me exercise scenario or link for sync/async bridge scenario?
Thanks
Narayana

Hi Balaji,
pls check this weblogs
/people/venkataramanan.parameswaran/blog/2007/01/18/syncasync-communication-in-jms-adapter-without-bpm-sp19
/people/sriram.vasudevan3/blog/2005/01/11/demonstrating-use-of-synchronous-asynchronous-bridge-to-integrate-synchronous-and-asynchronous-systems-using-ccbpm-in-sap-xi
/people/dmitry.govberg/blog/2006/12/20/mainframe-and-sap-integration--the-synchronous-case
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/1403 [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken]
conversations
Sync - Async Bridge
BPM Sync/Async Problem
BPM Design using sync-async bridge
Regards,
Ram

Sync/Async - JMS receiver comm. channel not processing

I have a Sync/Async scenario (without bpm) in PI 7.11:
RFC -> PI -> JMS
whereby the JMS receiver comm. channel does not fully process the message.
More specifically, the RFC sender comm. channel gets a message in and passes the message to the JMS channel, but that JMS channel within the RWB comm. channel log only shows the entry:
- Message processing started
The odd twist to this is that when we bring the PI server down, then back up again, (or wait a period of time, still trying to determine this period) the FIRST message attempt does successfully get processed, i.e. the first message on that JMS receiver comm. channel RWB log shows as:
- Channel successfully processed the message: 08499236-387c-11e0-b002-000025bab2c2
- Stored the correlation ID 08499236-387c-11e0-b002-000025bab2c2 of the request JMS message: ID:c3e2d840d4d8d4f24040404040404040c754dc12d8b54ec6 correponding to the XI message: 08499236-387c-11e0-b002-000025bab2c2
- Message processing started
(but then because of an issue on the target system, no response comes back, so then we'll additionally get the log entry:
- Message processing failed. Cause: com.sap.engine.interfaces.messaging.api.exception.MessagingException: no message received
Any suggestions appreciated on what I can check here to try and figure this out. Possibly because the first message eventually errors out, it is stopping the other subsequent msgs from getting processed...
When I check the audit logs of a 'success' msg vs. a not-successful msg, the success msg has an entry (and subsequent entries) of:
14.02.2011 12:50:19 Information Transform: transforming the payload ...
14.02.2011 12:50:19 Information Transform: successfully transformed
14.02.2011 12:50:19 Information ROB: entering RequestOnewayBean
14.02.2011 12:50:19 Information ROB: forwarding the request message
14.02.2011 12:50:19 Information ROB: leaving RequestOnewayBean
14.02.2011 12:50:19 Information JMS Message was forwarded to the JMS provider succesfully."
14.02.2011 12:50:19 Information XMB Message as Binary was forwarded to the SAP XI JMS service succesfully.
14.02.2011 12:50:19 Information WRB: entering WaitResponseBean
14.02.2011 12:50:19 Information WRB: retrieving the message for 08499236-387c-11e0-b002-000025bab2c2 ...
wheras the non-success msg shows only:
14.02.2011 12:55:30 Information Transform: transforming the payload ...
14.02.2011 12:55:30 Information Transform: successfully transformed
14.02.2011 12:55:30 Information ROB: entering RequestOnewayBean
14.02.2011 12:55:30 Information ROB: forwarding the request message
14.02.2011 12:55:30 Information ROB: leaving RequestOnewayBean
So, we can see that the message is not "forwarded to the JMS provider..." in the non-success case.
And also the sxi_monitor shows these messages with a status of "Log version".
Keith

Hi Siddhesh - yes that was a while back and am trying to remember the resolution. I have implemented sync/async bridges (as well as async/sync bridges) successfully, so I don't mind checking your settings, particularly I am interested in the settings within the Module tab of the JMS receiver. I can then compare to mine if you'd like. Also if you can let me know what underlying queuing system in that target system (e.g. MQSeries?) that would be great.
Regards,
Keith

BPM Sync/Async Scenario: error: "Timeout condition of pipeline reached"..!

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for