BPM - sync response

Guys,
In my BPM i have one sync rfc send.
For example:
BPM: async soap -> sync rfc -> async jdbc.
Where can i to see the payload from sync rfc response?
sxmb_moni - i dont found the payload.
communication channel monitoring - i too dont found the payload.
Then, where can i to see?

hi,
I think your file not reach the xi.
If sender side you are using SOAP(HTTP protocal) you cant see the message in sender communication.
It will directly put the file into integration engine.using TCP gateway you will get the file which you passed.
Like bellow ,
  HTTP protocal-TCPgw--XIserver.
*Reward Ponis If Helpful*
Regards,
Prakasu

Similar Messages

  • In BPM sync/async Step , can you have different message schema?

    Scenario:
    File to XI to BPM to SOAP to RFC
    In order to trigger the  webservice , I use  a dummy file which will be polled at a certain frequency- once in 30 minutes in Test mode - this will call the Webservice. The answer of webservice is sent to RFC Async.
    so these  are the Repository objects I created :
    1. File  Outbound Async Message Interface- Output Message (File_Request_MT)
    2.File Abstract Message Interface-Output Message (File_Request_MT)
    3.Async/ sync bridge Abstract interface to call the Webservice
    4 Webservice Inbound Sync Message interface-  with both input and output message
    5.RFC Inbound Async message interface- input message (RFC_Request)
    6 RFC Abstract Async Message interface-input message (RFC_Request)
    BPM
    a) Receive step  which uses the  the object 2.
    b) Sync send which uses object 3
    c) Send  step which uses Object 5
    I am using a BPM to Receive the file data/ "request " by using the File abstract message interface
    Then use the  the object  3 to call the webservice in BPM .
    My question is on this step
    Can I have for  the abstract Interface(Object 3) the Request message  as  File_Request_MT and
    response message as (RFC_Request) ?
    I  use a message mapping  to map Input and Ouput message of Object 3 with Object 4.
    Thanks for  your insight

    Raj,
    Thanks for the feedback , but I have  a question regarding your reply
    Interface Objects
    Object 1: File_Request_Abs
    Object 2: Soap_Response_Abs
    Object 3:Soap_Abs_Synch
    Output Message:File_Request_Abs
    Input Message:Soap_Response_Abs
    Object 4:Rfc_Request_Abs
    The question is  about
    a)SOAP_RESPONSE_ABS : could you please tell me why  do we need an abstract interface -SOAP_RESPONSE_ABS?
    I created a message type MT_SOAP_RESPONSE and used that in the BPM sync Send step as the Input message.
    b)Soap_Abs_Synch- I am using message types
    MT_File_request and MT_SOAP_Response From your reponse, it looks like you are suggesting to use
    Abstract Interfaces as Output message and Input Message, am I correct? Could you please tell me whether this has advantages over using message types MT_file_request and MT_soap_reponse? I haven't used Abstract interfaces  before as Input message and output message; infact, I wasn't even aware that it can be. Please confirm that it is possible. Thank you for increasing my knowledge !!!
    These are the Objects I created
    Message Type :
    a) MT_Filerequest
    b) MT_SOAPresponse
    Message Interface
    a)MI_Filerequest_out_async -
    Output message
    Mess. type MT_filerequst
    b)MI_filerequest_async_abs-
    Mess. type MT_filerequst 
    Used
    i) used for BPM receiver step- container definition
    ii) receiver determination
    c)MI_webservice_sync_in - This is created from External definition
    d)MI_webservice_sync_abs- 
    Input message  - MT_soapresponse
    Output message- MT_fierequest
    Used:
    i) used for BPM sync send step ,
    ii)Interface mapping between  MI_Webservice_sync_in and MI_webservice_sync_abs
    iii)Container element-SOAP_response
    e) MI_RFC_async_out
    Input message
    RFC_Request(This is imported from RFC definition)
    g) MI_RFC_async_abs
    Input message
    RFC_Request(This is imported from RFC definition)
    Mapping
    Message mapping
    i)Filerequest_TO_SOAPrequest
    Source: MT_Filerequest
    Target: SOAPrequest(Got from External definition)
    ii)SOAPresponse_TO_BPM_response
      Source : SOAPresponse(got from External definition)
    Target :   MT_SOAPresponse
    Interface Mapping
    i)IM_BPM_TO_SOAP
    Source Interface : MI_webservice_sync_abs
    Target :MI_webservice_sync_in
    uses following message mapping
    Request : filerequest_TO_SOAPrequest
    Response:SOAPresponse_TO_BPM_response
    BPM container element
    i)Receiver_container  TYPE MI_Filerequest_out_async
    ii)SOAP Responsecontainer TYPE MI_webservice_sync_abs
    iii)RFC_Request_container TYPE MI_RFC_async_abs
    BPM  flow
    Receive---->Send Synch-->Transformation----->Send Asynch
    Receive -
    > receiver_container
    Send Synch -
    > receiver_container(Request Message), Soap_response_container(Response Message)
    Transformation -
    > Source(Soap_response_container), Target(RFC_request_container)
    Send Asynch -
    > RFC_request_container
    Thanks for your help!!!

  • Error processing in non BPM sync process

    I've created a sync non BPM process which is working fine. Data comes from several terminals via HTTP. My scenario is HTTP=>XI=>RFC
    On the sending side, I use ABAP mapping or parser. I'm using this since I have to check some table data based on plant code and react accordingly.
    However, its quite possible that this table does not contain data for a given plant code or invalid plant code in which case I need to send back an response instead of calling RFC like I would normally do.
    Any idea how I can send back a message without going through RFC (receiver determination)....remember I have manipuated the RFC message in the ABAP mapping (in interface determination) and the only data I have available in receiver determination is original message which is not good.
    This has gotten very tricky now. I cannot use BPM due to WF response time + added RFC time (6 secs). Using non BPM I'm down to 1 sec or so which the users are happy.
    Thanks,
    Very confused XI programer.

    Michal, The table is in XI. Table has few different fields that are important to the interface esp. The R3 system to call. Based on the plant code, we decide which SAP system to send data to. And in XI, we store this info...ex: PIP3 plant goes to AI0 system. The terminals where is information is generated does not have this sophistication.
    How would you accomplish this HTTP=>XI=>RFC non BPM sync process. BPM adds too much time and the users don't wait that long in today process which will be replaced by XI. Non BPM yields 1 sec which is what they want. Thousands of messages flow and they cannot wait that long.
    Do you have suggestions.

  • R12.0.04 -Sync responsibility role data into the WF table -affurg02.sql

    Heloo my friend ;
    I try to run the following concurrent requests :
    Sync responsibility role data into the WF table and its gives me error and the erros is :
    Cannot find file /oracle/VIS12/apps/apps_st/appl/fnd/12.0.0/sql/affurg02.sql
    Cause: Application Object Library could not could not locate the file specified.
    Action: Contact your system administrator. Verify that the specified file and
    Concurrent Manager encountered an error while running SQL*Plus for your concurrent request 4585216.
    I didnt find anything in metalink,
    Anyone has idea?
    Helios

    Run "Workflow Directory Services User/Role Validation" concurrent program instead. <<I already did it... the link whihc u send me it doesnt say nothing.. The document say it only
    STEPS TO REPRODUCE THE PROBLEM:
    Navigate > System Administrator > Requests > Run . Select Sync responsibility role data into wf tables program.
    *** 02/19/08 01:59 am ***
    *** 02/19/08 02:00 am ***
    *** 02/19/08 04:09 am *** (CHG: Sta-&gt;30)
    *** 02/19/08 04:09 am ***
    *** 02/19/08 05:50 am *** (CHG: Sta-&gt;11)
    *** 02/19/08 05:50 am ***
    *** 02/19/08 08:44 am *** (CHG: Asg-&gt;NEW OWNER)
    *** 03/06/08 09:34 am *** (CHG: Sta-&gt;30)
    *** 03/06/08 09:34 am ***
    *** 03/16/08 12:31 pm *** (CHG: Sta-&gt;33)
    *** 03/16/08 12:31 pm ***
    *** 03/30/08 10:00 pm *** (CHG: Sta-&gt;92)
    *** 03/30/08 10:00 pm ***
    There is no solution, i found this documentation already but i cant see that
    *** 03/30/08 10:00 pm *** .... i hope u have other idea... i already try what u said me my friend ..
    Helios

  • Can a composte can directly can call AIA Sync Response SImualtor ?

    Hi ,
    I mean to ask any other service other than AIA requester or AIA provider can call a AIA Sync Simulator. other words Custom flows can be tested by using the AIA Response Simulator?
    I created a simple service which invokes a simulaor service adn get back the response form simulator but when i compile it was throwing errors. Can i call directly aia sync response simulator ?? while invoking the CAVS Service definition the messag defaulted is AnyMessage Type but i was pointing to the actual defiition of target system. As a reslt getiting ORABPEL-09706 assignment error.
    Can i test the SOA applciaitons with CAVS. If yes please let me know how can i test.
    Thanks,
    Edited by: user8650285 on Jan 14, 2013 12:24 AM

    Yes we can test the custom flows with AIA Sync Response Simulator(Other than AIA Requiestor or Provider Services)
    Steps followed to do it : -
    Source A
    Target B
    Remember target service is not running and wanted to test my bpel flow. So configured the simulator with the request and response of target application in CAVS.
    1.Moved the target WSDL B to ORAMDS.
    2.Then instead of creating a reference in composite from direct end point URL refer it from the MDS Layer.
    3. Enabladed the dynamic partner link adn used a property in composite.xml and assigned the required three variables to endpoint reference variable
    <property name="bpel.preference.IDM_endpoint_url">http://hostname:8001/AIAValidationSystemServlet/syncresponsesimulator?wsdl</property>
    to call the simulator.
    Note: Even you can set the dynamic end point url at run time using the mbean-
    Soa-infra->admistration-M Bean Browser - Oracle.soa.config->server1:soa_server1->SCA,composte-><CompositeName>->SCAComposite.Componentname
    on the right pane click properties under if its sync process u shjould see two properties one is bpel.config.transaction and other is
    endpoint reference url - since we enabled a dynamic partner link.
    At run time follow the approach to change the url to route the request to CAVS and test it.
    If you have any questions you can email me [email protected]
    Thanks,
    Venugopal SSS RAJA

  • Triggering a BPM(NW) using sync interface and get the sync response

    Hi Folks,
    I have a scenario where in I have to trigger a BPM (NW) using a sync interface from a SOAP client by making request to get the response from SAP webservice . If the response from SAP is successful then its a happy path but if it fails or times out then there is an failure mapping to ECC using an IDOC. My question is to achieve the sync process how many synchronous interfaces do I need to use? Please let me know if my design works with 4 sync interface. One outbound sync interface at the source (i.e the request ing system), the other inbound sync interface to the BPM to trigger the BPM, another outbound sync interface within BPM for the request to SAP. the fourth inbound sync interface at the ECC for the response from ECC. Or please let me know if there is a better design option than this.
    Regards
    Kalyan.

    Hi,
    Control Step
    Use
    You use a control step () to do the following:
    ·        Terminate the current process
    ·        Trigger an exception
    ·        Trigger an alert for Alert Management (see also: Triggering an Alert)
    Activities
    Terminate the Current Process
    Choose Terminate Process.
    At runtime, the system terminates the current process instance, including all active steps, and sets the status for the process to logically deleted.
    Trigger an Exception
    Choose Trigger Exception and specify the triggering exception (see also: Exception Handling). The relevant exception handler must be defined in the same block or a superordinate block.
    The system triggers the specified exception at runtime.
    For more information about using exceptions, see Example: Collecting and Bundling Messages - One Interface.
    Proxy..
    How to create proxy.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/14/555f3c482a7331e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
    How to Activate Proxy.
    /people/vijaya.kumari2/blog/2006/01/26/how-do-you-activate-abap-proxies
    ABAP Server Proxies (Inbound Proxy)
    /people/siva.maranani/blog/2005/04/03/abap-server-proxies
    OutBound Proxy (Client Proxy)
    /people/sravya.talanki2/blog/2006/07/28/smarter-approach-for-coding-abap-proxies
    /people/ravikumar.allampallam/blog/2005/03/14/abap-proxies-in-xiclient-proxy
    File to R/3 via ABAP Proxy with good example
    /people/prateek.shah/blog/2005/06/14/file-to-r3-via-abap-proxy
    Debug your inbound ABAP Proxy implementation
    /people/stefan.grube/blog/2006/07/28/xi-debug-your-inbound-abap-proxy-implementation
    Thanks,
    Satya Kumar

  • Async system - XI BPM Sync - Web service - SOAP response

    Dear Experts:
    I have the following scenario:
    Async Proxy to XI to web service. I use BPM to make this a sync call to the web service. It works fine!
    I have a XSLT mapping for the response message from the web service. I use XSLT because the structure of the positive and fault responses are different. Anyway, I could get the positive response post ok back in the XI system.
    But the fault response does not get mapped and I get a APPLICATION_ERROR of category UNKNOWN in the SXMB_MONI. I also configured exception handling in the BPM. But it does not catch this error.
    Can anyone suggest how to handle the fault response from the web service?
    Thank you.

    I just had the same problem and solved it like this: I modified the WSDL slightly by removing the prefix from the reference to the element of the response message, as well as the "targetNamespace" in the xsd:schema segment of the WSDL. Like this, SAP is able to parse the response.
    Philippe

  • BPM sync to jdbc produces No receiver could be determined

    Hi,
    I am sending a sync select statement from BPM to JDBC adapter but I get the following error: No receiver could be determined.
    I checked in MONI and I can see the select statement, even the response but I get this error. I looked at the graphical workflow log and every step "executes successfuly" but in the XML messages list I have 3 messages, 2 with the successful flag and one with a red flag, the red flag displays this error.
    Since both interfaces, the BPM abtract interface and the inbound interface for the JDBC adapter are BOTH SYNC, shouldn the response message arrive back at the BPM automatically ? or must I define another reciever determination ?
    Cheers.

    Hi,
    How have you used the send step? In this case it should be used with sync mode.
    Selcet the mode property of "send" step as synchronous. Then you will have to give two message types one for request and the other for response.
    After this send step you can have a normal send step and you can use this to send response wherever you need.
    Regards,
    P.Venkat

  • BPM Sync Send Step & Correlation

    Hi Experts,
    BPM Scenario: Step wise
    1. Receive-1 from one sender
    2. Send-1 it syncu2019ly to SAP using proxy and receive the response msg
    3. N: 1 transformation b/w request message and response message to generate a target message
    4. Send-2 the target message to a receiver
    Though the scenario seems to be simple, I have a doubt about the sync send step.
    How does the sync send step works in detail?
    For every message the Receive-1 receives, a new process instance will be generated. When the message is sent to SAP syncu2019ly, how does it relate the response to the particular process instance?
    For example, if 2 BPM process instances are created for two messages the Receive-1 step receives. However say, the second message is relatively less in size; in-turn consumes less time to execute in SAP and reaches XI well before the response for first message.
    Which process instance will it be related to?
    Please explain!
    Karthik

    Thanks, Udo! With your reply I heave that itching thought.
    I would happy to read more about this sync-session logic.
    Can you please provide more information/ blog/ material for detailed info?
    P.S. pts added to you!
    Thanks,
    Karthik

  • Dynamic Receiver Determination [W/O using BPM] Sync interface

    I have been exploring options w.r.t. performance sensitive service interface.
    This has following issues :
    1. Gets a org code looking up instance and route the msg. accordingly to an RFC and get response back.
    2. Prominent answer would be Enhanced receiver determination step but that doesnt work in sync case.
    3. Classic Receiver Determination needs the condition to be evaluated in source msg. which is not going to happen.
    4. Use BPM i designed one but performance its not all acceptable it has a round trip of 10Sec.
    are there any ways to overcome this ?

    Hi Bujji,
    can you explain the point 1.
    <i>1. Gets a org code looking up instance and route the msg. accordingly to an RFC and get response back.</i>
    Thanks and Regards,
    Himadri
    null

  • BPM Sync Interface

    Hi friends,
    In my current interface, i am using BPM and in that i am sending sync request to Proxy, when the proxy takes more time i.e. more than 3 mins, i am getting timeout error in xi monitoring. Because the default timeout parameter was 3 mins. Now i changed all the default parameters to 5 mins. Even now, i am getting the same timeout error.
    My current BPM design,
    Start - Receive - Transformation - Sync Send - Transformation - Send - End.
    Please suggest me, whether we can have any wait step to wait for specified minute after the Sync send step. If we add that wait step, will there be any performance issue?
    Please suggest me.
    Regards
    Bala

    In a Sync step the Request and Response happen in the same call
    Now in Async flow you make a request (using the same Req Message that you are using in the Sync Request Message section).
    Then have Async Receive step (with a correlation defined).
    Disadvantage:
    1) In this case you need to have a field for correlation
    2) Call has to be made Async on the receiving system also....so config may change at target end...
    Advantage:
    No need to worry about the time taken to receive the Response ....  however it is always better to introduce some alert mechanism if the response is not received within some desired timeframe ... this behavior is shown in the BPM designs present under: IR -> SAP BASIS> http://sap.com/xi/XI/System/Patterns --> BpmPatternReqRespAlert
    Regards,
    Abhishek.

  • BPM Sync Interface - Help

    My current scenario is File to Proxy Sync
    From the sender side, two files are coming, so that i am using BPM in my interface.
    My current BPM Steps
    Inside the fork, i have give 2 receive stps.
    Receive 1 - Receiving First file
    Receive 2 - Receiving second file
    Transformation - Mapping - Merging 2 files
    Send Step - Sending data to Proxy.
    By using the above steps, my scenario is working fine without any response from the proxy.
    Now, my proxy is giving response back, i need to receive the response and send the response to a file.
    Experts pls advise me, how to handle this within BPM?
    Thanks in advance..
    Regards,
    Mani.

    Hi Abhishek,
    I was getting error in coorelation, now it is fine and i have completed the bpm steps as you recommended and did the checking in the IR, no error was displayed. Now I am doing ID configuration.
    I have given the steps in ID that i have created, Pls correct me, if i am wrong.
    Sender Agreement:
    File 1 - File Adapter
    File 2 - File Adapter
    Receiver Agreement
    BPM - ECC - Proxy Interface
    Interface Determination
    File System - File Interface1 to BPM receive step 1
    File System - File Interface2 to BPM receive step 2
    after this point, i got bit confused in creating interface determination. How many interface determination and receiver determination we need to create, since we are using two transformation and two send step in the BPM.
    Pls advise me in this.
    Regards
    Mani...

  • BPM Sync/Async Scenario:  error: "Timeout condition of pipeline reached"..!

    Hi,
    I am doing Sync/Async BPM scenario.
    -> Receive message and process and response back to the sender.
    Sometimes it will correct correctly. Sometime the message will come and stay in XI and fails with error
    <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="1">
      <SAP:Category>XIServer</SAP:Category>
      <SAP:Code area="INTERNAL">PL_TIMEOUT</SAP:Code>
      <SAP:P1 />
      <SAP:P2 />
      <SAP:P3 />
      <SAP:P4 />
      <SAP:AdditionalText />
      <SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
      <SAP:Stack>Timeout condition of pipeline reached</SAP:Stack>
      <SAP:Retry>N</SAP:Retry>
      </SAP:Error>
    I observed that the messages will stay in transaction "SXMS_SAMON" . and will fail after sometime.
    What might be the reason. ? what need to do to stop these kind of errors?
    Thanks
    Deepthi.

    Hi Praveen,
    Webservice <--> XI -->BW .
    BPM :
    start ->Receive(Request)> Transformation(Responsemap)>Send(SendtoBW)->Send(Send Response) ---> stop.
    Messages are getting struck in SMQ1 and SM58 at these three points.
    1. Message comes and stays in SXMB_MONI in status "Log Version"
    The messages are stuck in SMQ1 in READY status without doing any processing.
    XBQO$PE_WS90100002    WORKFLOW_LOCAL_100 1 READY 26.02.2009
    Once I push the queue by Activating/Unlocking, it will process.
    2. when it is trying to send the message to R/3 (Backend system) it is waiting in SM58 with below entry.
    WF-BATCH SWW_WI_EXECUTE_INTERNAL_RFC WORKFLOW_LOCAL_100 Transaction recorded
    Manually I execute LUW to push it. Once I done the message will go to R/3 system and Response mapping also complete.
    3. Again it is waiting at SM58 with below deatails while sending the response to sender.
    PIAFUSER  SWW_WI_COMP_EVENT_RECEIVE_IBF  WORKFLOW_LOCAL_100  Transaction recorded
    we are again manually execute LUW. Once we done the response message will go back to Sender.
    Any Idea to solve this..?
    Thanks
    Deepthi

  • BPM Sync/Async Problem

    I am trying to setup the sync/Async bridge.Scenario is below.
    Receive (Open Sync/Async Bridge) --> Send Async > Receive Async> Send (Close sync/Async)
    I am doing exactly those steps which is provided in Pattern.
    Following are in the interfaces.
    Sync Interface to post message to BPM (OutBound)
    (This interface is exposed as WebService)
    Abstract Sync Interface used by BPM.
    Async Abstract Interface for Request Message used by Container.
    Async Abstract Interface for Response Message used by Container.
    Async Inbound Interface to receive message sent by BPM in Async Send Process.
    Async Outbound Interface to send message to BPM by Async Receive.
    All the configuration Sender agreement/receieve agreement/interface determination/Receive Determination looks fine.
    On posting soap data I get the following exception.
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
    <!--  Receiver Identification
      -->
    <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="1">
         <SAP:Category>XIServer</SAP:Category>
         <SAP:Code area="RCVR_DETERMINATION">NO_RECEIVER_CASE_BE</SAP:Code>
         <SAP:P1/>
         <SAP:P2/>
         <SAP:P3/>
         <SAP:P4/>
         <SAP:AdditionalText/>
         <SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace=""/>
         <SAP:Stack>No receiver could be determined</SAP:Stack>
         <SAP:Retry>N</SAP:Retry>
    </SAP:Error>
    Any pointers will be great help!
    Thanks,
    Samir

    Hi Samir
    As you are trying Sync/Async BPM scenario and having a webservice as your sender,go through this link as it is quite similar to your scenario--
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/sdn/weblogs.sdn?blog=/pub/wlg/1403 [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken]
    If you still face error then post it in forum.
    Regards
    Arpit Seth

  • BPM Sync/Async Bridge

    Hi,
    I am trying to build a Async/Sync Bridge in BPM. However the difference is that I need the response to be sent to a different third party to the one which sent it.
    The complete scenario is as follows: A third party sends an XML file - this is picked up with the file adapter. PI then does the appropriate mapping and calls a BAPI on ECC. The response is then sent back to PI and sent to a different third parties WebService.
    I have followed the document "Demonstrating How to Use Async/Sync Bridge in BPM" by Leela Ratna Morampudi.
    Sending the response back to the original sender is straight forward engough. However Im not sure how to send it back to a different third party? Is this possible? Any help would be appreciated
    Also, Is it possible to build this scenario using a JMS Async/Sync bridge and avoid using a BPM?
    Rg,
    Krishneel

    Hi Swarup,
    Thanks for your posts.
    I have built everything, however I'm facing some problems with the RFC receiver. In the communication channel monitor I see this error:
    Message processing failed. Cause: com.sap.engine.interfaces.messaging.api.exception.MessagingException: com.sap.aii.adapter.rfc.afcommunication.RfcAFWException: error while processing message to remote system:com.sap.aii.adapter.rfc.core.client.RfcClientException: could not get functionname from XML requst: com.sap.aii.adapter.rfc.RfcAdapterException: failed to read funtionname from XML document: missing namespace declaration(2)
    Do you know what could be wrong?
    I have already tried reimporting the BAPI and refreshing the caches without any luck.
    Thanks,
    Krishneel

Maybe you are looking for

  • How can I get Preloader to work with my (Edge Animate) project?

    I have carefully followed the instructions to set up a simple preloader gif for my fairly large project. After hours of torturous examination, I still cannot find out why the preloader gif does not appear. Can anyone help?  The project is at: Coda -T

  • Field - Show only X number of characters; Show all when double-click.

    Hi, I'm not too sure if this can be done. I can to show the content of a field for only the 1st 15 characters and if user were to double-click on it, it will then show the entire field content. Is this possible at all? E.g., the full content of the f

  • MF50 not able to book Capacity  on Saturday and Sunday

    Dear Experts,   In MF50 planning table the  if we book  requirement on Saturday and Sunday .we are abel to book the requirement but "Not yet assigned" is gyred out system is creating a back ward scheduling to friday. In work Centre we maintained fact

  • Unable to print address labels in SMARTFORMS.

    Hi. I am facing a problem during the printing of address labels from table ADRC in SMARTFORMS. I would like describe my issue in detail. In my Global Defininations, I have Types----> TYPES:   BEGIN OF fs_adrc,    date_to    TYPE adrc-date_to,    addr

  • Honestly.......TimeMachine?

    TimeMachine was Apples biggest push to HD manufactures in the world to grab a piece of the cash cow. Why on earth do I need to go buy a HD specifically to back up my entire computer on specified dates or times and keep those backups JUST incase. I've