BR0970W Database administration alert - level: ERROR, type: HARMFUL_STATIST
Dear all,
We have recently migrated 4.6c/oracle9i/solaris 6800 5.8 to 4.6c/oracle10g/HPUX11.23
After the migration everything was succesfull. Except the below error, when I run a dbcheck from db13.
BR0970W Database administration alert - level: ERROR, type: FILE_OFFLINE, object: /oracle/DV2/mirrlogA/log_g1m2.dbf
BR0970W Database administration alert - level: ERROR, type: FILE_OFFLINE, object: /oracle/DV2/mirrlogB/log_g2m2.dbf
BR0970W Database administration alert - level: ERROR, type: FILE_OFFLINE, object: /oracle/DV2/mirrlogA/log_g3m2.dbf
BR0970W Database administration alert - level: ERROR, type: FILE_OFFLINE, object: /oracle/DV2/mirrlogB/log_g4m2.dbf
BR0970W Database administration alert - level: ERROR, type: HARMFUL_STATISTICS, object: (table) SAPR3.APQD
BR0970W Database administration alert - level: ERROR, type: HARMFUL_STATISTICS, object: (table) SAPR3.APQI
BR0970W Database administration alert - level: ERROR, type: HARMFUL_STATISTICS, object: (table) SAPR3.ARFCRSTATE
BR0970W Database administration alert - level: ERROR, type: HARMFUL_STATISTICS, object: (table) SAPR3.ARFCSDATA
BR0970W Database administration alert - level: ERROR, type: HARMFUL_STATISTICS, object: (table) SAPR3.ARFCSSTATE
BR0970W Database administration alert - level: ERROR, type: HARMFUL_STATISTICS, object: (table) SAPR3.ATAB
BR0970W Database administration alert - level: ERROR, type: HARMFUL_STATISTICS, object: (table) SAPR3.CDCLS
BR0970W Database administration alert - level: ERROR, type: HARMFUL_STATISTICS, object: (table) SAPR3.COIX
BR0970W Database administration alert - level: ERROR, type: HARMFUL_STATISTICS, object: (table) SAPR3.COIX_DATA40
BR0970W Database administration alert - level: ERROR, type: HARMFUL_STATISTICS, object: (table) SAPR3.DBTABLOG
BR0970W Database administration alert - level: ERROR, type: HARMFUL_STATISTICS, object: (table) SAPR3.DDLOG
BR0970W Database administration alert - level: ERROR, type: HARMFUL_STATISTICS, object: (table) SAPR3.DDNTF
BR0970W Database administration alert - level: ERROR, type: HARMFUL_STATISTICS, object: (table) SAPR3.DDNTT
BR0970W Database administration alert - level: ERROR, type: HARMFUL_STATISTICS, object: (table) SAPR3.DDXTF
BR0970W Database administration alert - level: ERROR, type: HARMFUL_STATISTICS, object: (table) SAPR3.DDXTT
BR0970W Database administration alert - level: ERROR, type: HARMFUL_STATISTICS, object: (table) SAPR3.EPIDXB
BR0970W Database administration alert - level: ERROR, type: HARMFUL_STATISTICS, object: (table) SAPR3.EPIDXC
BR0970W Database administration alert - level: ERROR, type: HARMFUL_STATISTICS, object: (table) SAPR3.GLSP
Can anyone help us to overcome the above issue
Regards
Senthil
Thank you Warren. I shall do that reply to you.
Also I have received the below error messages
oracle9i/solaris 6800 5.d to 4.6c(Kernel46D)/oracle10g/hpux11.23.
Everything works fine except the below Three errors:
BR0970W Database administration alert - level: ERROR, type: FILE_OFFLINE, object: /oracle/DV2/mirrlogA/log_g3m2.dbf
BR0970W Database administration alert - level: WARNING, type: IN_WRONG_TABLESPACE, object: (table) SAPR3.APQD, value: PSAPAPQDD
BR0978W Database profile alert - level: ERROR, parameter: LOG_ARCHIVE_START, value: FALSE (<> TRUE)
Can you help
Regards
Senthil
Similar Messages
-
BR0970W Database administration alert
I get this error in DB13 in CheckDB, .
BR0970W Database administration alert - level: ERROR, type: MISSING_INDEX, object: (table) SAPCRM.VCSMONITOR
Please suggest the fix for this.
Thanks
ShajiHi Markus,
Thanks for your reply.
I checked in SE14, the table VCSMONITOR is Transparent table and the Status is "Not Actve" (Exists in the database).
List of all indexes (constraints) of the table
Index name Unique Short description
0 X Primary index
There are no secondary indexes
Checked for this table/objec in ECC/SRM/BW systems, in SE14 it reports as "object does not exist".
Could you guide me further please.
Regards
Shaji -
Warning in DB13 Check DB "BR0970W Database administration alert"
Hi
We have an alert message in DB13 when we check the checkdb log. Log details are as below
BR0970W Database administration alert - level: WARNING, type: CRITICAL_FILE, object: /oracle/EPR/sapdata10/btabd_11/btabd.data11, value: (max_size) 30466040 KB (> 29439485 KB)
This warning is for all the datafiles; I did just give the sample log above.
Can you please suggest and help resolving this issue?
Thanks in advance.Hi,
The issue here is that there is no enough disk space for the datafiles to extend. In this case you can turn off the auto extend or Increase the disk space of sapdata10 or decrease the max_size or you can move some of the datafiles to other directory or filesystem.
You can turn off the auto extend while the database is online. After turning off the auto extend, you need to monitor the datafile/tablespace size periodically.
Regards,
Varadhu -
Hi
here i am posting the issue as below:
BR970W Database administration alert - level: WARNING, type: CRITICAL_SEGS, object: (table) SAPR3./BMC/YGR_AVAILAB, value: 640 K
as i checked with SAPDBA -f, i am getting an error
a - Tablespace: PSAPYBMCD
b - Log checks: no
c - Free space and fragmentation of all tablespaces
d - Check free space of objects in all tablespaces
e - Check free space of objects in tablespace PSAPYBMCD
f - Alter tablespace PSAPYBMCD add data/temp file
g - Drop tablespace PSAPYBMCD
h - Display all tablespaces and data/temp files
r - Display raw device drivers in /dev
q - Return
Please select ==> f
SAPDBA: Error getting file system space information of
'/oracle/sid/sapdata7'.
(Such entry does not exist.)
Press <return> to continue ...
as i checked.............
bdf | grep /oracle/sid
/oracle/SID/sapdata1
so my Q is how to change the filesystem to /oracle/SID/sapdata1 from sapdata7.
sap : 4.6c
oracle : 9.2.0.8.0
os : hp-ux
so can anyone help me in changing the filesystem path?
Thanks in advancesHi,
It seems that environment variable SAPDATA<n> are not comfiture properly?
But why dont use brspace?
e.g. +brspace f tsextend -t PSAPYBMCD -f SAPDATA1 -s <size>+
Nahum -
Dear SAP Gurus,
We are getting the following error in Check Database in DB13
BR0978W Database profile alert - level: WARNING, parameter: LOG_BUFFER, value: 14254080 (>< 4096,512 KB)
The current Parameter : 14254080
We have change the parameter as per SAP Note#830576, still the same error is comming.
Kinldy Help.
Thanks in advance.Hi Vijay,
Are you trying to change log_buffer to a smaller size and you can't? If you on Oracle 10g, you won't be able to reduce log_buffer as according to Oracle Metalink 351857.1, "The Log_buffer Default Size Cannot Be Reduced In 10g R2".
If you are concern about the warning in DB13, go to txn DB17 to change the condition will help to get rid of the warning.
Regards,
Annie -
Dear all:
Running the CheckDB in the transaction DB13 and i get the following
message of error:
"BR0978W Database profile alert - level: WARNING, parameter: DB_BLOCK_CHECKSUM, value: TRUE (<> FALSE)"
Other Details :-
OS :- Win 2003 server
DB :- Oracle 10g
So please help on this issue.
Thanks.
RegardsHi,
Oracle allows customers to use advanced block checking features to enable a higher protection against hardware and software problems.
Also with block checking/checksum turned on, it is absolutely necessary to verify your database. Enabling this feature will only find blocks which are touched (read into the SGA).
Advanced block checking can be enabled by setting either
db_block_checksum = true
or
db_block_checking = true
The reason for this warning is given in the following SAP Note 923919 - Advanced Oracle block checking features
Default recommended by SAP is TRUE.
If this information is helpful please reward points.
Regards,
Suhas -
BR0978W Database profile alert - level: WARNING, parameter: STATISTICS_LEVE
Hi,
While doing DBCheck one of my system i found this error
BR0973W Database operation alert - level: WARNING, operation: cdvkvbva.sta, time: 2007-06-07 06.05.02, condition: Last update optimizer stati
BR0976W Database message alert - level: WARNING, line: 13165, time: 2007-06-07 22.53.58, message:
BR0976W Database message alert - level: WARNING, line: 13184, time: 2007-06-07 22.55.23, message:
BR0976W Database message alert - level: WARNING, line: 13203, time: 2007-06-07 22.57.35, message:
BR0976W Database message alert - level: WARNING, line: 13590, time: 2007-06-08 00.09.04, message:
BR0978W Database profile alert - level: WARNING, parameter: STATISTICS_LEVEL, value: TYPICAL (set in parameter file)
How to resolve please help what to check in DB17
Thanks
PunitBR0973W Database operation alert - level: WARNING, operation: cdvkvbva.sta, time: 2007-06-07 06.05.02, condition:
After seeing into file we found this error
BR0301E SQL error -20000 in thread 4 at location stats_tab_collect-18, SQL statement:
'BEGIN DBMS_STATS.GATHER_TABLE_STATS (OWNNAME => '"SAPR3"', TABNAME => '"/BI0/0P00000025"', ESTIMATE_PERCENT => 10, METHOD_OPT => 'FOR ALL COL
ORA-20000: Unable to analyze TABLE "SAPR3"."/BI0/0P00000025", insufficient privileges or does not exist
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_STATS", line 13149
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_STATS", line 13179
ORA-06512: at line 1
BR0886E Checking/collecting statistics failed for table SAPR3./BI0/0P00000025
BR0976W Database message alert - level: WARNING, line: 13165, time: 2007-06-07 22.53.58, message:
"checkpoint not complete" error
SAP 79341 - Checkpoint not complete
The note which you have suggested is not suited to my environment what are the other possibilities the above error i am facing in one of the server does there i any data loss
Thanks the 3 rd problem is solved
Punit -
BR0978W Database profile alert - level: WARNING, parameter: OPTIMIZER_INDEX
Hai Experts
When I executes DBChek i am getting following error
BR0978W Database profile alert - level: WARNING, parameter: OPTIMIZER_INDEX_COST_ADJ, value: 20 (<= 20)
already checked the database parameter for OPTIMIZER_INDEX_COST_ADJ is 20,
Thanks in advance
KHSHello,
Please, read slowly the message you are getting:
K Hari Shankar wrote:
> BR0978W Database profile alert - level: WARNING, parameter: OPTIMIZER_INDEX_COST_ADJ, value: 20 (<= 20)
Lets try to understand it.
1.- It is telling you that your parameter is currently set to 20 (and that is a correct value as per relevant SAP note that you have checked)
2.- it is telling you that the current value is lower or equal to a specified valued to be checked against (<=20)
so, what could be the "problem", your parameter setting is OK, and the check is telling you the true, but you do not want the "warning"
perhaps the check is not properly configured?
of course 0.o
it should be checking if the value is different than 20, not lower or equal to 20
therefore, you have to change the check
this is done with DB17, go to that transdaction and change the check (perhaps it is DB16, right now I'm not 100% sure which one is display and which one is for change) -
Databse alert warning / Error
Dear All,
Followig datbase check warning observed in producion server.
Database profile alert - level: ERROR, parameter: FILESYSTEMIO_OPTIONS, value: DIRECTIO (<> SETALL)
Database profile alert - level: WARNING, parameter: LOG_BUFFER, value: 14501888 (>< 4096,512 KB)
Database profile alert - level: WARNING, parameter: OPTIMIZER_INDEX_COST_ADJ, value: 20 (set in parameter file)
Database profile alert - level: WARNING, parameter: TIMED_STATISTICS, value: TRUE (set in parameter file)
Please reply me How to correct this Warning / Error ?
Regards,
SantoshWe are using Oracle 10.2.0.2.0 Version , on SAP ECC 6.0.
According this Note , If I change the Paramter FILESYSTEMIO_OPTIONS, value: DIRECTIO ( SETALL)
so , which are the dependable paramerer I have to change ?
Please reply me the same.
Regards,
Santosh -
EM12CR3 - Alert Log Errors page - empty
What controls the content shown in Oracle Database->Logs->Alert Log Errors ?
The page shows empty - but if we look in the actual alert log we can clearly see ORA-0600 errors showing there. In fact if we do the more generic show alert log, search and look for Errors, it shows up there just fine.
Oct 10, 2013 3:04:21 PM UTC
ERROR
8
https://oem03cnc.rim.net:7803/em/console/database/instance/adrAlertLogContent?target=edwp_edwp7&type=oracle_databasehttps://oem03cnct:7803/em/console/database/instance/adrAlertLogContent?target=edwp_edwp7&type=oracle_databasehttps://oem03cnc:7803/em/console/database/instance/adrAlertLogContent?target=edwp_edwp7&type=oracle_database
ami_comp
dbgripsto_sweep_staged_obj:15736:70631439
Sweep [inc2][672054]: completed
Oct 10, 2013 3:04:21 PM UTC
ERROR
8
https://oem03cnc.rim.net:7803/em/console/database/instance/adrAlertLogContent?target=edwp_edwp7&type=oracle_databasehttps://oem03cnct:7803/em/console/database/instance/adrAlertLogContent?target=edwp_edwp7&type=oracle_databasehttps://oem03cnc:7803/em/console/database/instance/adrAlertLogContent?target=edwp_edwp7&type=oracle_database
ami_comp
dbgripsto_sweep_staged_obj:15736:70631439
Sweep [inc][672054]: completed
Thoughts?This alert should show up ..
<msg time='2013-11-02T23:37:18.436+00:00' org_id='oracle' comp_id='rdbms'
msg_id='684699380' type='INCIDENT_ERROR' group='Generic Internal Error'
level='1' host_id='edwp07' host_addr='10.65.65.189'
prob_key='ORA 600 [kghstack_free1]' upstream_comp='' downstream_comp='KGH'
ecid='' errid='714327' detail_path='/u01/app/oracle/diag/rdbms/edwp/edwp7/trace/edwp7_bmr0_52817.trc'>
<txt>Errors in file /u01/app/oracle/diag/rdbms/edwp/edwp7/trace/edwp7_bmr0_52817.trc (incident=714327):
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kghstack_free1], [iobuf_krbabrAddBlock], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
</txt>
</msg> -
DB13 Check, Oracle BR0973W Database operation alert warning
Dear all master and Gurus,
when i run check DB process on DB13 it was completed with following errors. i've serched over googling, SDN, and others but couldnt get any exact answer.
BR0973W Database operation alert - level: WARNING, operation: aeghclvm.dsv, time: 2011-07-09 13.35.38, condition: Last successful 'dsv' operation older than 10 days
BR0973W Database operation alert - level: WARNING, operation: beghcgas.afd, time: 2011-07-09 12.30.18, condition: Last successful 'afd' operation older than 10 days
BR0973W Database operation alert - level: WARNING, operation: beenppkm.aff, time: 2010-11-10 22.35.48, condition: Last successful 'aff' operation older than 10 days
What is the meaning of dsv, afd , and aff?
Should I ignore these warning?
How to resolve ?
Any advise is needed, Thanks
Gustria WekaHi
When a backup of database or archive log is triggered, it writes a log file and the extension is based on the type of backup executed
Names of the BRBACKUP Detail Logs
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70ehp1/helpdata/EN/0d/d30ec54a0c11d182b80000e829fbfe/content.htm
Names of the BRARCHIVE Detail Logs
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70ehp1/helpdata/EN/0d/d30ec54a0c11d182b80000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
Hope this helps you.
Regards,
SBK -
Oracle BR0973W Database operation alert warning
Hello experts,
I hope you can help me with the following:
In transaction DB13 the checkdb job reports the following errors:
BR0973W Database operation alert - level: WARNING, operation: sdvgirhz.dbp, time: 2007-05-14 15.46.27, condition: Last 'dbp' operation failed with rc = 4
BR0973W Database operation alert - level: WARNING, operation: sduxubpz.tse, time: 2007-03-30 08.58.27, condition: Last 'tse' operation failed with rc = 4
BR0973W Database operation alert - level: WARNING, operation: sduxuaou.dfa, time: 2007-03-30 08.46.40, condition: Last 'dfa' operation failed with rc = 2
I would like to get rid of these messages in dbcheck but can't figure out how to do it.
I searched the notes database, google and this forum and still couldn't find an answer.
Some data regarding oracle and sap versions:
SAP_ABA 700 0009 SAPKA70009 Cross-Application Component
SAP_BASIS 700 0009 SAPKB70009 SAP Basis Component
PI_BASIS 2005_1_700 0006 SAPKIPYJ76 PI_BASIS 2005_1_700
ST-PI 2005_1_700 0003 SAPKITLQI3 SAP Solution Tools Plug-In
SAP_BW 700 0006 SAPKW70006 SAP NetWeaver BI 7.0
SAP_AP 700 0003 SAPKNA7003 SAP Application Platform
BBPCRM 500 0003 SAPKU50003 BBPCRM
ST-A/PI 01I_CRM500 0000 - Application Servicetools for CRM 500
Database system ORACLE
Release 10.2.0.2.0
Thanks in advance for helping.
Regards
Dirk Visserthe operations mentioned were not succesfully done...check the corresponding logfiles
-> dbp = alter database parameter (brspace)
-> tse = extend tablespace (brspace)
-> dfa = alter data file (brspace)
GreetZ, AH -
BR0973W Database operation alert in DB13 - XI Production
Dear All
I am getting following error on DB13 on our XI Prd system..i serch ove the web & SDN but couldnt get any valid reason for this ..can some one assist me in resolving this warning ..
"BR0973W Database operation alert - level: WARNING, operation: sechrknv.dfa, time: 2010-01-08 11.33.19, condition: Last successful 'dfa' operat
BR0973W Database operation alert - level: WARNING, operation: secehvio.tse, time: 2009-12-21 15.56.50, condition: Last 'tse' operation failed
BR0973W Database operation alert - level: WARNING, operation: secdecqf.tse, time: 2009-12-15 14.51.01, condition: Last successful 'tse' operat"
Regards
BuddhikeHi,
BR0973W Database operation alert - level: WARNING, operation: sechrknv.dfa, time: 2010-01-08 11.33.19, condition: Last successful 'dfa' operat
BR0973W Database operation alert - level: WARNING, operation: secdecqf.tse, time: 2009-12-15 14.51.01, condition: Last successful 'tse' operat"
You are getting some warning messages for different functions which are already performed.
such as,
dfa Alter data file
tse Extend tablespace
which are done by BRSPACE program.
You can ignore these warnigns.
If you check trx DB14, click 'Function ID's you will see where each one comes from.
Run, Clean Up Logs Job from DB13.
And Please Weekly Schedule/Run DB13 T-Code and Run Job - Clean Up Logs.
Using the cleanup parameters in the Initialization Profile init<DBSID>.sap you can determine how old the objects are before they are deleted.
The check conditions are specified in the control table DBCHECKORA. You can change these with transaction DB17
Regards,
Bhavik G. Shroff -
BR0978W Database profile alert
Hi,
DB02-----> Check DB it's showing these warnings.
Please checks it and suggest me.
BR0978W Database profile alert - level: WARNING, parameter: DB_WRITER_PROCESSES, value: 4 (<> 1)
BR0978W Database profile alert - level: WARNING, parameter: LOG_CHECKPOINT_INTERVAL, value: 0 (< 300000)
BR0978W Database profile alert - level: WARNING, parameter: OPTIMIZER_FEATURES_ENABLE, value: 9.2.0 (<> 8.1.7)
Regards
S.PrasadHello Prasad,
Well the parameter recommendation is depends on the database version and SAP release version.
Using the relevant parameter notes for the affected system (Oracle 9i and lower: Note 124361 and 180605 (BW); Oracle 10g and higher: 830576), check whether the settings (<curr_val>) you are using are actually correct. If so, use transaction DB17 to change the <check_val> test values for the affected parameters to the correct <curr_val> value, to avoid future unjustified warnings. Alternatively, you can also deactivate or delete the checks in DB17 (Active = "N").
If warnings are issued correctly, you must adjust the parameter settings in init<sid>.ora (and, if necessary, the other configuration files included there using IFILE).
Best Regards,
Madhukar -
Database-level error reported by JDBC driver
Hi everyone,
I get an error in my Sender JDBC adapter. I am executing a stored procedure every minute. In total I have 34 JDBC senders for every different database. The error is like below. The problem is in Alert Inbox I cant see the rest of the message. This error occures just once every hour (average). I dont know why and I dont know what the rest of the error is saying.
Any ideas how i can see the rest of the message? And where the error might be?
Note: In communication channel monitoring everything is green.
Database-level error reported by JDBC driver while executing statement 'EXEC [TBHi,
obviously there are concurring accesses to the table your stored procedure is accessing. This is nothing serious, because SAP XI will retry the execution of the stored procedure according to the settings of the communication channels (3times all 5 minutes is the default). Additionally you can set the repeats in case of SQL errors in the extended tab of the communication channel configuration.
Tuning the transaction isolation levels might help to avoid the error but can decrease the consistency of the data as well. Default isolation level is always the highest available in a database (in case of SQL Server it should be SERIALIZABLE), so locks might easily occur. I would suggest to have a look at other applications accessing the tables and determine their isolation level.
All in all, I guess there shouldn't be real problems, because of the repeated execution of you stored procedure, but it's worth to have a look at the isolation level.
Regards Sven
Maybe you are looking for
-
Hi, Can any one clarify on this, Im using oracle GG replication, What is the process mechanism for importing the data from export dump file in to tables, Whether GG can able to handle the import operation? I need to import the table data in the sourc
-
Merging multiple ObservableList notifications
I have an MVC architecture implemented using JavaFX for querying a medical database. I have two ListViews, one for a database filter, and one for the database fields to be returned. When a user adds a value to the ListView<Filter> an item is usually
-
Hi All, I want to set EOIO service for Sender Proxy. since for proxy no need for sender aggrement, so i did not create it. When i trigger the Proxy from ABAP report, the messages are going in different orderlast first and first as last, but i want th
-
X-Fi Xtreme Gamer Micropone unmuting
I've been having an unusual problem with my "X-Fi Xtreme Gamer" sound card while playing games on my pc. This is happening everytime i play Gears of War for Windows at the moment and occaisionally in Half Life 2. My setup at the moment is to mute eve
-
Why I can not find the application of whatsapp?
I did upgrade to the iPhone. And I wanted to download the application of whatsapp again but she did not appear in appstore. Why not find the application?