BREAK IN ADVANCED PULLDOWN CADENCE (PATTERN) FOUND NEAR T.

Yep, I'm trying to do the pulldown and it says this:
BREAK IN ADVANCED PULLDOWN CADENCE (PATTERN) FOUND NEAR T.
or this
FRAMES IN FILE SATRTING NEAR T ARE NOT ENCODED AT 24 P.
What should I do? Thanks

We had a shoot once, where the camera we had rented (also a DVX-100B) had its scene files edited by the previous user and were not defaulted to the factory settings by the rental shop. Not to blame them, WE should have checked. But we didn't and when choosing Scene File 6 (Cine-like 24PA) it was actually only shooting in 24P. Needless to say in a 24P or 24PA DV workflow, due diligence is required, but not easy to maintain.
But Zeb is right to ask which you shot it in. 24P (in the DVX-100B) is actually 29.97 in reality. You capture and edit in 29.97.
If you take a look at the captured 29.97 footage does it look ok? Or is it a little jumpy here and there and lack the smoothness it had when you shot it? (Hopefully you were able to review a bit of it in the Camera to make sure things were ok?)
And, what happens when you try to capture using the Advanced Pulldown removal option, where FCP removes the Pulldown on capture/import?

Similar Messages

  • Breaks in VFR pulldown cadence were detected in flood wall ....

    Working with 24pA material:
    During a batch capture we received the error message:
    "breaks in VFR pulldown cadence were detected in flood wall during last capture"
    has anyone encountered this error
    i'm guessing there is digital drop-out on our dubbed tapes
    but what exactly is a flood wall ?????

    Trash your preferences? FCP Rescue
    This is just a blanket statement, as I have not had that issue myself...so I don't know what to suggest. Try CAPTURE NOW and see how far you can go. What sort of drives are you capturing to? How full are they? How are they formatted? If they are firewire, do you have a firewire card so that the drive and the deck are on different buses?
    Shane

  • Problem removing advanced pulldown

    Hi There,
    I have some 24p footage I digitized at 29.97 by accident. When I go to the tools menu and select "remove advanced pulldown" i get an error that says "break in advanced pulldown cadence (pattern) found near t." Any ideas?

    Are you certain it's 24PA and not 24P?
    You might be able to break it into smaller chunks with QT Pro and try removing advanced pulldown on that, but that's just a shot in the dark...
    Patrick

  • Advanced Pulldown Issues

    I'm capturing footage from a concert recorded on a bunch of Panasonic DVX100a cameras. ALL cameras were configured identically for 24p Advanced recording.
    Most tapes are capturing fine, but with some I am constantly getting an error in the advanced pulldown cadence. So, I have several questions:
    (1) Is there a way to actually SEE what the pulldown cadence is for the footage in question?
    (2) Where can I go to get more IN DEPTH information on pulldown cadence (I have already read a bunch of stuff on it)—specifically as it applies to FCP, if possible?
    (3) From what I've read about Cinema Tools, it seems to be more suited for standard 3:2 pulldown, not advanced 2:3:3:2 pulldown. Am I mistaken, and how would I go about using CT in this case?
    (4) In the capture window, when I advance through the footage one frame at a time, I can see that every 5th frame appears interlaced (I realize this is the split frame in the middle of the 2:3:3:2 pattern). This pattern is consistent—even at the point where the errors occur there seem to be no "breaks". So what problem is there with the pulldown cadence that's causing the error?
    (5) If I capture the footage normally, at 30fps, can I then dump it back to tape at 24p Advanced to re-apply the 2:3:3:2 pulldown? Is this an acceptable way to fix the problem, or will I end up with the interlaced 5th frame (see question 4 above) littered throughout the new footage?
    Any posts, articles, books, or web sites that can be suggested to help me understand this problem are appreciated.

    Thanks for your reply...This is all good info, and just makes me realize how much more I have to learn on this topic! I was under the impression that removing the pulldown would help with the appearance of interlacing once the material is captured...but could be understanding this incorrectly. I suppose I'm simply trying to get the best image quality with as little appearance of interlacing as possible. The other problem is that I'm sure whether it was shot as 24 P or 24 PA...it's unfortunately an acquired project that was started quite a while back, and we are taking over from a big ad firm who is not so willing to help. Sooo...there wasn't much difference in interlacing/quality etc when I capture with pulldown versus without, so I'm assuming that means its 24 P. We are adding this material to some newer material just shot on DVCPro HD at 24 p, and will eventually make it's way to DVDs, the company's website, etc. Don't think it will be used for broadcast...Sooo, any advice about workflow would be great!! Should I be capturing at 29.97 or 23.98? With/Without pulldown? Is there anything I can do about the interlacing? Thanks!!!

  • Cinema Tools doesn't recognize pulldown cadence on 24p DVCPRO 50

    Hi everyone, I'm hoping someone can give me a couple suggestions on this...
    I've been capturing 24p material for a documentary from different sources and with different pulldown cadences: DV @ 24p and 24p Advanced, and DVCPRO 50 @ 24p.
    The extra frames from the two DV types get removed properly, but not from the DVCPRO 50. I take a clip into Cinema Tools and hit 'Rev Telecine..' (Automated so no options to choose from) and it gives me a 23.98 clip with the what should be the C frame interlaced. (A B C/D D)
    It looks like CT is removing 2:3:3:2 'advanced' pulldown and not the normal 2:3:2:3, like it's reading the metadata in the clip wrong. Does anyone know a way to manually set the type of pulldown--either in Cinema Tools or within the metadata of the clip itself?
    Thanks in advance,
    Will
    Dual 2.7 GHz G5, 4.5 GB RAM   Mac OS X (10.4.2)   FCP 5.03, Cinema Tools 3.03

    I didn't know therre was an Automated way either until working on this project, and maybe it's a new setting in Cinema Tools 3. The manual says that CT will recognize the pulldown on the clip automatically when it was shot in a 24p video camera, that this information gets embedded in the clip. The dialog box it gives you for the automatic reverse telecine has no options at all, and all my clips started on an A frame for the possibility of doing all as a batch.
    I may have found what happened, (although not how to fix it). My capture setting had Remove Advanced Pulldown checked, and the tapes were recorded with regular pulldown. In my experience with DV footage this has never mattered, it would remove it if it could and if not leave the clip alone.
    It looks like there's a bug somewhere in the DVCPRO 50 capture process--that the clip is has the 24p Advanced markers embedded even though it is regular 24p, and so Cinema Tools treats it improperly and removes the wrong frames:
    24p Advanced (2:3:3:2) A B B/C C D 29.97 Footage
    24p (2:3:2:3) A B C/B C/D D
    I I 0 I I (CT removing 2:3:3:2 Pulldown)
    24p Advanced A B C D
    24p *my result* A B C/D D 23.98 Footage
    Has anyone else encountered this bug? Any work arounds known?
    Thanks,
    Will

  • Browser says Advanced pulldown didn't take: try cinema tools?

    I'm in the midst of capturing many hours of interview footage shot in 24PA on a DVX100a. Although I always use the advanced pulldown capture setting, my results are inconsistent at best. According to FCP5's browser, some of my captured clips are 23.xx fps while others are still 29.xx fps.
    1) Can I trust the accuracy of the info I see in the FCP browser with regard to the frame rate of my captured clips?
    If so,
    2) Should I now go back and try to recapture the clips that are listed as being 29.xx fps? Or would I be better off using Cinema Tools, which I understand can remove the pulldown from an already captured clip. One factor in my reluctance to re-capture is because there are occassional TC breaks in my footage that I often have trouble removing pulldown on the fly.
    Thanks!
    Powerbook G4 15"   Mac OS X (10.4.4)  

    I had this problem once with DVCPro HD, and found the problem to be that if my capture started in bars & tone (I would go 1 second into them, to ensure I got every frame of video), FCP would take the B&T frame rate for the whole clip, which happens to be 60i. So as a result, any clip that had B&T at the head was at 60, while any other clip that started midway through the tape was fine. Perhaps you have the same situation, where you are capturing a camera generated signal, which will be at 29.97, so FCP assumes that that is the frame rate you're going for.
    Hope this helps.
    Craig

  • Problems removing Advanced Pulldown frames

    I'm relatively new to 24PA, until now, I have captured quite a few projects now without any problems. The footage is always shot DVCPRO 50, I use the Panasonic AJ-SD93 Deck to capture the footage, selecting "remove advanced pulldown frames" in the FCP capture settings, and end up with great 23.98 progressive advanced footage.
    The most recent project I've been working on, we received tapes that were shot by the same production group, same settings, same camera, and I was capturing with the same deck, same FCP settings, etc...however, after capturing, the files were not 23.98, but 29.97 (as a test, I captured from tapes in a previous project, it immediately came in as 23.98).
    I tried to solve the issue after the fact by selecting the "Remove Advanced Pulldown" selection in the tool menu and received the error message *"File does not contain frames encoded using Advanced Pulldown".*
    The 29.97 footage, based on my knowledge, seemed to indicate that it was, in fact, 24PA. For two reasons, one - every fifth frame in the 29.97 footage was a "split" frame, and two, breaking the footage down into fields, it seemed to have the 2-3-3-2 cadence associated with 24PA. However, for whatever reason, Final Cut could not find the cadence.
    Why might this be?
    I'd appreciate any informed opinions, but I can say that my guess is it has something to do with timecode and timecode breaks. The footage had an awful lot of timecode breaks and the timecode was being forced. I am wondering if this has something to do with why FCP could not pick up the cadence in the footage. (The only other variable that changed from previous successful 24PA projects is that these tapes were dubbed, and perhaps the dub house - which has shown itself prone to the occasional mistake - messed something up, but in this instance, don't see any evidence of that.)
    Ultimately - I worked around the issue just fine, but it only makes matters more confusing, I brought the footage into Cinema Tools and did a Reverse Telecine (3:2 pulldown) and the footage turned it into clean-looking 23.98 progressive footage. Like I said before, analyzing the footage appeared to reveal that it was certainly 24PA with a 2-3-3-2 cadence and not 24P with a 2-3-2-3 cadence.
    Any thoughts are welcome, thanks -

    Just a thought: if the dub house made the dubs over SDI or analog, then the 24PA "flags" that were on the originals were likely not retained. That may be why FCP isn't seeing the pulldown cadence. I believe the only way to retain those advanced pulldown flags is to dub via firewire.
    You can try capturing at 29.97 and running the files through Cinema Tools. Or see if the production company can send you the camera originals.
    Jay

  • Remove Advanced Pulldown and Reverse Telecine...

    Hey guys,
    I have read all the hundreds of postings here about problems with removing advanced pulldown. Some people mention using compressor to get the clips to 23.98. I was happy to find that indeed compressor did get the clips that I couldn't remove pulldown in FCP on to 23.98, and that those clips play on the same timeline as my other 23.98 clips. HOWEVER, the clips that were reverse telecined, then brought into FCP play with a stroby effect... There's weird horizontal lines through them. Anyone know what is going on? I guess I will start re-logging and capturing the clips as shorter clips and then try to remove the advanced pulldown on them (from what I understand FCP can't remove the pulldown if there is a cut within a clip...) but if anyone knows of an easier way to deal with this, let me know. I am working with 50 hours of footage, probably 5 of which I couldn't get the advanced pull down off of, so it's a lot of work! Thanks!

    I found this answer to one of the posts about removing advanced pulldown problems:
    "Are you certain it's 24PA and not 24P?
    You might be able to break it into smaller chunks with QT Pro and try removing advanced pulldown on that, but that's just a shot in the dark..."
    Patrick
    Can someone explain how to use Quicktime Pro to break the clips into smaller chunks without going through and re-logging and capturing all over? Although, I already put all the clips that didn't get the pulldown removed in FCP through cinema tools to make them 23.98 too...I suppose this will make it impossible for me to use the QT PRo method...I am losing days of work here making smaller and smaller clips out of this material by logging and capturing over and over so I'm desperate to make sure there's not an easier way around this...
    Outside of when you are tranferring to film, does anyone have a really good reason to shoot 24pA on the dvx100? With this project it was definitely a mistake!

  • Advance pulldown removal problem

    There is a bit of info i've found about similar issues but nothing covers my scenario. I captured dvx100a 24pa footage-- but without the advance pulldown removal selected. The clips therefore all had frame rates of 29.97. I then went to tools and added the "*remove advance pulldown*".
    Two different things happened to my clips. It's corrupting some clips and not others. Some worked and changed to 23.98 fps. Others instantly went offline and when I tried to reconnect the media from the capture scratch I get this:
    "*File Error: 1 file(s) recognized, 0 access denied, 1 unknown*" and I can't reconnect the media--that still plays fine in quicktime from the capture scratch. I have to re-digitize all the random clips that this happens to.
    I'm wondering if it might be a fps and timecode issue-- or a codec issue. Any ideas would be greatly appreciated.
    thanks.

    Think I figured it out. There was a duplicate folder with the media files on two hard drives and FCP may have been trying to reference both. Deleted one folder and files went offline then when i reconnected the media and applied "remove advance pulldown" it worked this time.

  • Quick question about advanced pulldown

    Hi,
    So, I am trying to make a MiniDV backup of a 23.98 sequence using FCP 4.5 and a Sony DCR-VX2000 camera. The footage in the sequence is non-time coded 23.98 footage from a DVD. To test if my backups are actually backups that I could later edit in 23.98, I have printed to tape, recaptured and removed the pulldown with either Cinema Tools or using Remove Advanced Pulldown, and placed the recaptured footage in a new 23.98 sequence. However, neither method has worked-- the wrong frames are removed or the captured footage just looked screwed up.
    I tried two methods: printed to MiniDV with a 2:3:2:3 pulldown in the Playback settings, recaptured into FCP using normal DV capture, then used Cinema Tools'"batch reverse telecine" to remove the pulldown, then placed the footage in a new 23.98 sequence When that didn't work, I tried a 2:3:3:2 pulldown print to tape and captured using Advanced Pulldown Removal. That looked even worse.
    Any suggestions? Thanks in advance.
    Powerbook G4 Mac OS X (10.3.8)

    Well, this is what I did:
    I created 4 tests clips, each printed to tape with a different playback setting (2323, 2332, 2224, full quality).
    I then recaptured them all using both "Advanced Pulldown Removal" and no pulldown removal with Cinema Tools Batch Reverse Telecine used to remove pulldown on the clips.
    Results: The proper frames seemed to be removed when 1) I printed to tape with a 2:2:2:4 pulldown and Reverse Telecined through Cinema Tools and 2) when I printed to tape with Full Quality and used Advanced Pulldown Removal. Nothing else worked.
    HOWEVER, with both "succesful" methods, I found that when I played the clips in a 23.98 sequence, they had noise in he picture -- thin black horizontal lines on areas of quick movement. However, when clicked through frame by frame, this noise does not appear.
    So, Apple users of ther world, who can explain a) why full quality works with Cinema Tools and b) what to do about the noise in the playback picture (but again not seen frame by frame), and whether it is part of the actual clip or not?
    Powerbook G4 Mac OS X (10.3.8)

  • 23.98 fps advanced pulldown removel with lower field dominance??

    When ever I have captured 24p advanced material shot on a DVX100B, I have always used Final Cut Pro 5's advanced pulldown removel easy set up (2:3:3:2). I haven't run into any issues until now. When I try to capture 24p advanced material, for some reason Final Cut sets my field dominance as lower (even). I made sure I was using the capture pre-set for advanced pulldown removel (23.98) and I was. Is there any way to fix this? I tried trashing my preferences but that didn't help. This is progressive scan material so in the past Final Cut Pro has always set it to field dominance as "none". Also, because my 24pa material is having a lower field dominance and as 29.97fps, I have to render in my 24pa sequence which I have never had to do. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
    PS: I'm using OSX 10.4.8 (the OS choice drop down menu hasn't been updated)
    Update: I tried capturing a short clip (about 30 seconds) and it worked fine, but when I try capturing my clip, which is about 10 mins, I get it capured at 29.97 with lower field dominance.

    Anyone ?

  • Removing Advanced Pulldown from AVI files

    I've recently switched from Vegas 4.0 to Final Cut Pro 5.1 and I'm trying to remove the advanced pulldown from my AVI files. I tried using Cinema Tools and it could not use the AVI. Then I tried using FCP tools/remove advanced pulldown option and the file went offline. Can sombody tell me how to do this?
    Thanks

    It wasn't out of sync before. I shot it on the Panasonic DVX100 in 24pa. Removed the pulldown and edited the film in Vegas. Now I want to transfer it to FCP change it to 16X9 and make a 16X9 24P DVD in DVD Studio Pro. When I did copy it back to tape from Vegas I used LP instead of SP so I could fit the entire movie on a mini dv tape. Maybe that has something to do with it not being able to remove the pulldown during capture? I think I'm going to try and split it up into 2 tapes and record sp mode.
    Mac Pro 2.66   Mac OS X (10.4.7)   FCS

  • Field Dominance inconsistent after Advanced Pulldown capture

    Following up on my immediately previous post (regarding the interview footage I captured from my dvx 100A using advanced pulldown setting in FCP5) I notice that, according to my FCP5 browser, some of my captured 23.xx clips show a Field Dominance of Lower (Even), while other clips show the word None under Field Dominance. Should I be concerned? And, if so, what's the solution?
    Thanks!
    Powerbook G4 15"   Mac OS X (10.4.4)  

    Answered in another topic. Thanks!

  • Remove Advanced Pulldown and Duplicate Frames

    I've been researching this but still have not figured it out:
    When I import Canon XF100 footage shot in 24fps from my CF card into FCP 7, in the "Log and Transfer" window under "Preferences", should I check or uncheck "Remove Advanced Pulldown and Duplicate Frames"?  My thought was to uncheck the box since it is a function specific to P2 cards and that it wouldn't make a difference either way for my footage.  Also (and I could be wrong), I didn't think any pulldown was necessary since I was shooting in 24fps.  However, when I examined 2 test clips taken through both paths, there was one noticeable difference: the unchecked clip is larger (644.8MB) than the checked (582.8MB).   Hmmmm....
    Does this mean the footage changes based on if that box is checked or not? 
    And in my shooting/import scenario, should I check or uncheck that box?
    Thank you.

    23.98 and 23.98
    > I have a few different cameras and some need pulldown and some don't but I've always left it checked under the > assumption that if there's nothing to pulldown it can't/won't and everything has been fine.
    good to know.  i agree.  based on my conversations with the canon xf software folks, they were not entirely sure whether or not to check the box, so it doesn't seem to be a significant impact on the work flow.
    thanks all for your input.

  • ADVANCED PULLDOWN REMOVAL - Problem with 60 Hours of Material

    After I capture about 60 hours of material and worked for the past 3 months in a 90 minutes documentary I realized that the material was shoot in 24P advanced and was not captured in advanced pulldown removal mode! What should I do now? Should I do an online of the 90 min sequence with advance pulldown removal? What should I expect to happen? Thanks a lot in advance for your help.

    I am delivering an EDL to do an online in HD for later on blow it up to 35mm. I just don't want to fix problems in the online because it'll take time therefore MONEY. I was thinking on recapturing the master sequence in my machines at advanced pulldown removal, fix any problems and then export the EDL to go to the online.
    Dual 2 GHz G5; 4.0 GB RAM,   Mac OS X (10.4.8)   Dual 2 GHz G5; 2.0 GB RAM,

Maybe you are looking for

  • Installing iTunes with Windows Vista Ultimate

    I have tried to install iTunes most recent version and others earlier with on my HP Pavillion and I keep getting a message that says I will not be able to import or burn CDs because iTunes did not install correctly. I have the *Windows Vista Ultimate

  • Error in CO88 - Very Urgent

    When we run CO88 - Actual Settlement, I have the following error occurs - "Order 1101396: Split delta (207,260.00 in currency 10) according to standard price Message no. MLCCS 015 " Can some one help me, very urgent

  • Using ROWNUM in ODI

    hey, i want to use ROWNUM in my target table (DAYS) like: Field 1(rownum) Field2 1 Monday 2 Tuesday i create a field in my target table and in the mapping i use ROWNUM but it doesnt work. Thanks for ur help Mehdi

  • Using like operator with attributes in select command

    Hi, I have a table with the attributes as DID, PNO,AGE, DEPARTMENT, DATEOFADM, CHARGES, ADDRESS, DOD I want to display the records with the months in DOD and DATEOFADM same. How can I do so? I also want to do the same with the dates in the 2 attribut

  • Weblogic Singleton Service concurrent updates

    Our environment has 1 cluster with 4 managed servers(each in a different physical servers).We have a requirement to maintain a cache which is transparent to all the 4 servers(only one copy is expected to be available at any point of time in the clust