Bridge CS4 Output Only 10 Images to Web Gallery

Hello all,
I have, in Bridge, output workspace, selected 14 imges to be output to the web gallery and only the first 10 images are processed. Any idea as to why? Maybe it is as simple as a setting in the preferences? Thank you so much in advance.

If you are referring to what happens when you click "Preview in Browser", then yes, the output does only include the first ten images.
To preview the full Web Gallery before uploading it, you must generate the Web Gallery and then preview it by double-clicking on the "index.html" file which will cause it to open in your default browser.

Similar Messages

  • ONLY 10 IMAGES IN WEB GALLERY!

    I am just starting to use this wonderfull tool (bridge) I love it so far. I have ran into the problem where i can only put 10 images into a web gallery even though i have 50 selected.
    First is there a limit to the number of pictures you have in the web gallery?
    Secondly can anyone help me out there?
    -Thanks Alot
    Mark          

    Hi Mark,
    If you are talking about what you see in the Preview, then yes, that is restricted to the first ten images in your selection.
    If you go ahead and create the web Gallery and then view it, you will see all of your selected images.

  • After CC trial, my CS6 bridge has no capability to make a web gallery.  How do I restore this?

    After CC trial, I've stayed with my regular non-clod version of CS6.  However, CS6 bridge has no capability to make a web gallery.  How do I restore this?

    Set the home page to http://www.google.co.nz/
    *https://support.mozilla.com/kb/How+to+set+the+home+page

  • CS4 Bridge - Black stroke around image in Web Gallery

    More specifically, I'm using the LightRoom Flash Gallery selection as that provides just the structure that I want/need. To match my website (still in construction) I've altered the colors in Bridge's controls. Separately, I've added a frame around each image in Photoshop with a dropshadow that bleeds into the background color (again, to match the website).
    The problem is that there is a 2 pixel stroke around the image.
    Unfortunately since the image has a frame of its own with a drop shadow bleeding to the page color as part of the image, and that there's a 2 pixel stroke around the image, I've got a dropshadow contained within a stroke frame around the image that already has a frame. To my eyes it looks rather silly.
    Is there anything I can do to get rid of this stroke? You can see two images with the problem here:
    http://thecoynes.com/hdr/hdr_photographs/
    By the way, before you suggest it, in the color palette options for this Web Export, there is an option for "Border." Unfortunately that is for the 1 pixel round-corner-rectangle border around the thumbnails and image. It doesn't do anything to *this* border. In addition, the structure of this web gallery is EXACTLY like the one in LightRoom and has the exact same results and problems.
    Thanks for any help,
    Gary

    Tomrock,
    Please read the last paragraph where I start "By the way, before you suggest it..."
    In other words, yup, I've tried that and it refers to the 1 pixel border around the thumbs and the overall image.
    Thanks for suggesting anyway, I've spent way too much time on this already.
    Gary

  • How to get rid of the large slideshow images in Web gallery (CS4)

    Here is the deal.
    I've created a flash web gallery/ But the new CS4 has the option for slideshow with this flash stuff. CS3 use to create thumbnail and large images folders. The new one creates 3 folders: 1. thumbnails, 2, medium images, 3 large images (for the slideshow). That's great, until I go to upload process. I have pretty limited space. So I'm ready to get rid of the slideshow option, but there's no such option in gallery creating process. The only solution I have in mind is to redirect slideshow images to the medium size folder. But thats pretty annoying process during the creation of each gallery.
    So does anyone has an idea how to skip the slideshow creation or another method to skip creating 3 folders, all with the same images?

    Extend DefaultListCellRenderer, not BasicComboboxRenderer. Here's an example that wraps the original renderer and uses it where possible (i.e. instanceof JLabel). No 'white square'.import java.awt.BorderLayout;
    import java.awt.Component;
    import java.text.DecimalFormat;
    import javax.swing.*;
    public class ComboRendererTest {
      public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
        UIManager.setLookAndFeel(UIManager.getSystemLookAndFeelClassName());
        SwingUtilities.invokeLater(new Runnable() {
          public void run() {
            new ComboRendererTest().makeUI();
      public void makeUI() {
        JComboBox comboBox = new JComboBox();
        comboBox.addItem(new Double(1));
        comboBox.addItem(new Double(2.25));
        comboBox.addItem(new Double(3.5));
        comboBox.setRenderer(new TwoDecimalRenderer(comboBox.getRenderer()));
        JFrame frame = new JFrame();
        frame.add(comboBox, BorderLayout.NORTH);
        frame.setDefaultCloseOperation(JFrame.EXIT_ON_CLOSE);
        frame.setSize(200, 200);
        frame.setLocationRelativeTo(null);
        frame.setVisible(true);
    class TwoDecimalRenderer extends DefaultListCellRenderer {
      private ListCellRenderer defaultRenderer;
      private static final DecimalFormat FORMAT = new DecimalFormat("#.00");
      public TwoDecimalRenderer(ListCellRenderer defaultRenderer) {
        this.defaultRenderer = defaultRenderer;
      @Override
      public Component getListCellRendererComponent(JList list, Object value,
              int index, boolean isSelected, boolean cellHasFocus) {
        Component c = defaultRenderer.getListCellRendererComponent(list, value,
                index, isSelected, cellHasFocus);
        if (c instanceof JLabel) {
          ((JLabel) c).setText(FORMAT.format(value));
        } else {
          c = super.getListCellRendererComponent(list, value,
                  index, isSelected, cellHasFocus);
          setText(FORMAT.format(value));
        return c;
    }db

  • Low quality images in web gallery from Output Module

    So when I create a web gallery slideshow using the output module I get SUPER-low quality images, like big jagged, pixellated lines in place of any diagonal line in the pictures. However, only photos in the portrait orientation are affected by this problem. Landscape-oriented photos look perfectly normal, just smaller.
    My first thought was that maybe the images were low quality in the web gallery preview but wouldn't be in the actual saved file, but alas I saved the index.html file and when I preview it in my web browser I get the same result with the portrait-oriented photos.
    Any idea how to fix this? Other than only using landscape photos in my gallery of course!
    Thanks!

    The same problem here. I've noticed it just yesterday, but my Safari rendering is affected the same way.
    I don't think it has anything to do with the recent updates. I reinstalled my MacOS X Leopard day ago and all the images (jpg, gif) have been somehow in lower quality ever since that moment. Even before I installed all new updates today.
    The strangest think is, that it wasn't like this before the reinstallation. I used the same media, and I have, indeed, the same machine.
    I'm hopeless. Have you already found some solution? Or anybody? Would be great...
    Martin

  • Why is the Bridge CS4 Output Workspace an Exception?

    OUTPUT is the only one of eight Bridge CS4 workspaces that does not return to its default configuration upon choosing "Reset Workspace" (although it does do so for the "Reset Standard Workspaces" option). Is there a rationale for this peculiar exception?

    Maybe they thought the user would want to keep his own configuration for further output.
    That module is pretty limited though – I think it's a work-in-progress that was rushed out to meet the stupid marketing deadline.

  • Scripting Adobe Bridge CS4 Output Module

    Anyone done it? An API definition appears absent from the Bridge CS4 SDK documentation.

    Thanks. I'm not familiar with ExternalObject, can you shed some additional light on the subject? Previously I've used the Adobe Photoshop Scripting Reference to figure out what objects to instantiate and invoke. I note all sorts of things I can invoke in the Bridge CS4 docs, but not the Output Module. These files you refer to on the drive, I'm not sure what you mean. I can find all sorts of jsx samples, but none pertinent to this particular issue.
    Thanks again.

  • Bridge CS4 Won't Download Images

    I just bought a new computer with Wndows 8.1. I've installed Adobe Creative Suite 4 and encountered a problem with Bridge CS4. When I select File > Get Photos From Camera the dialogue box comes up, but it gets stuck on "Loading Device List... Please Wait"
    Bridge freezes at this point and the only way I can close the program is to use Task Manager.
    I've searched both this forum and the rest of the net and I've seen a number of people with the same issue but no fix aside from reseting the operating system. Has anyone had the same issue and found a solution, or have some ideas?
    I've already ruled out issues with the SD card and card reader - issue occurs with multiple cards and readers. I've gone through the Adobe" Bridge Help / Troubleshoot errors, freezes" and tried everything suggested there. Any thoughts?
    Thanks,
    Matt

    Yes, as soon as the card is plugged in the Bridge Downloader comes up and does the same thing -
    gets stuck on "Loading Device List... Please Wait".
    Thanks for the response.

  • Pixelated Images on Web Gallery - Help!

    We have been receiving complaints from our clients that our web gallery images are pixelated - and indeed they are to the point that you cannot recognize the person in the image! I have tried to upload different resolutions - high (3000 pixels or more) and low (900 x 1000 or so) and nothing seems to change the way the images look. We use bridge we gallery for clients to order from, so this is obviously effecting what they want to order. Anyone have any ideas on how to remedy this? Please help!

    I am not sure how to determine that. The only options available there are for Small - Extra Large images, nothing about the size in K. When it is in Bridge it looks the way all photos look in Bridge, but when I actually upload it to the web that is when things get ugly.

  • Adding Images to Web Gallery

    After my Web Gallery is uploaded and I get additional images from subsequent shoots, I'd like to import and add them to the slideshow, then to the Web Gallery without having to re-type the Web Gallery info into the boxes again. Any way to accomplish this would be greatly appreciated. Many thanks!

    Only if you use a separate FTP Client and just overwrite the originals with the Sharpened ones. Make sure you are replacing the correct ones or doing them all. Most Galleries from LR generate two or three Sizes.
    Don
    Don Ricklin, MacBook 2Ghz Duo 2 Core running 10.5.1 & Win XP, Pentax *ist D See LR Links list at http://donricklin.blogspot.com for related sites.

  • Link to high resolution image in web gallery

    Hello.
    Is there any way to include a link to a high or full resolution image using the web gallery creation tool? (similar to the option available in various jAlbum galleries)
    So sorry if this is a repeat question...
    Lightroom 1.3.1
    OSx 10.4.11
    Thanks!

    Check out the galleries at The Turning Gate http://www.theturninggate.net/. Matthew has at least one Gallery, AFAIK that does what you want.
    Don
    Don Ricklin, MacBook 2Ghz Duo 2 Core running 10.5.1 & Win XP, Pentax *ist D See LR Links list at http://donricklin.blogspot.com for related sites.

  • Missing images in web gallery- strange lines??

    When I make a web gallery and publish to .mac a couple of images appear to be missing or are cropped.. its really odd.. everything looks fine in the preview. Also I sometimes get these really strange thin lines through my images.. I usually dont notice them until I get my prints done.. Has either of these happened to anyone? Thanks.

    nikinoo --
    In the past I've experienced the same problem with some web galleries. The problem went away after I quit Aperture & then opened it up again. I then went and republished the problem gallery without a hitch.
    I too have experienced lines running through my images, but it's been quite some time -- The upgrades that Apple has released appear to have corrected the problems. It might be helpful for you to list what printing settings you are using, there are tons of people here who should be able to help.
    John

  • Bridge CS4 with very large image archves

    I have just catalogued 420,000 images from 3TB of my photographic collection. For those interested, the master cache files became quite large and took about 9 days of continuous processing:
    cache size: 140 gb
    file count: 991,000
    folder count: 3000
    All cache files were also exported to the disk directories.
    My primary intent was to use the exported cache files as a "quick" browsing mechanism with bridge. Of course, "quick" is a rather optimistic word, however is is very significantly faster than having bridge rebuild caches as needed.
    I am now trying to decide if it is worth keeping the master bridge cache because of the limitations of the bridge implementation which is not very flexible as to where and when the master cache adds new temporary cache entries.
    Any suggestions as to the value of keeping the master cache would be appreciated. I don't really need key word or other rating systems since I presently use a simple external data base for this type for image location.
    I am also interested in knowing if the "500,000" entry cache limitation is real - or if more than 500,000 images can be stored in the master cache since I will be exceeding this image count next year.

    I have a bridge 5 cache system with 600,000 images over 8 TB of networded disk.  I too use this to "speed up" the browsing process and rely primarily on key word processing to group images.  The metadata indexing is, for practical purposes, totally useless (it never ceases to amaze me about why Adobe things it useful for me to know how many images were taken with a lens focal length of 73mm - or some other equally useless statistic).  The only thing I can think of that is are serious missing keyword indexing feature is the ability to have a key word associated with a directory.  For example, I have shot many dozens of dance, theatre, music and sports productions - it would be much more useful to cataloge a directory that has the key words "Theatre" and "Romeo and Juliette" than attempt to key-word each individual image.   It is, of course, possible to work around the restrictions but that is very unclean and certainly less than desireable.   Key-wording a project (i.e. a directory) is a totally different kettle of fish than key-wording an image.  I also find the concept of the "collection" is very useful and well implemented.
    I do maintain a complete cache build of my system.  It is spread over two master caches, one for the first 400,000 images and a second for the next 400,000 (I want to stay within the 500,000 cache size limit - it is probabley associated with the MYSQL component of Bridge and I think may have problems if you exceed the limit by a substantial amount.  With Bridge on CS3, when the limit was exceeded , the cache system self-distructed and I had to rebuild).
    The only thing I can think of (and that seems to be part of Adobe's design) is that Bridge will rebuild the master cache for a working directory "for no apparent reason" such as when certain (unknown) changes are made to ACR,   Other automatic rebuilds have been reported by others however Adobe does not comment upon when or what casuses a rebuild.  Of course, this has serious impact upon getting work done - it is a bloody pain to have bridge suddenly process 1500 thumbs and preview extracts simply to keep the master cache completely and perfectly synchronized (in terms of image quality) with what might be displayed if you happen if you want to load a raw image into photoshop.  This strategy is IMHO completely out of step with how (at least I) use the browsing features of bridge.
    It may be of concern that Adobe may, for design reasons, change the format of the directory cache files and you will have to completely rebuild all master and directory caches yet again - which is a real problem if you have many hundreds of thousands of images.  This happened when the cache system changed from CS3 to CS4 - and Adobe did not provide conversion programme to migrate the old to new format.  This significantly adds to the rebuild time since each raw image must be completely reprocessed.  My current rebuild of the master cache has taken over two elapsed weeks of contunuous running.
    It would be nice if Adobe would allow some control over what is recorded in the master cache - for example, "do you wish meta data to be indexed".
    (( as an aside, adobe does not comment upon why, when using Bridge to import images from a CF card, results in the building a .xmp file with nothing but meta data for each raw file.  I am at a loss to speculate what really useful thing results other than maybe speeding up the processing of the (IMHO useless) aspects of meta data ))
    To answer your quiestion, I do think the master cache is worth keeping - and we can pray that Adobe puts more though process into why the master cache exists and who uses the present type of information indexed within the cache.

  • Viewing images in Bridge CS4

    I have recently reloaded CS4 on a new computer.  Image preview not working in Bridge CS4 - shows only CR2 file icon instead of image.  How do I get my image preview back?

    Update Camera Raw.
    Mylenium

Maybe you are looking for